Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
3
z
Fig 2.2 fields regions
2.4.2 Radiation pattern of antenna
We have to create an approximate model for dipole radiation pattern as it is difficult and
complex to form its exact model. This can be attained by studying the small parts or
segments of the dipole, for which every individual segment is considered having
uniform current.
The examined dipole is called as Hertzian dipoles, shown in fig 2.3 (a)
R = distance from the observation point to point z on the dipole, and is given as
R = x
2
+y
2
+(z z)
2
R > 2l
2
/ = far-field dipole region as shown in fig 2.3 (b)
For determining the radiation pattern, the approximation which we made are given as
R r, Terms of amplitude
R r z cos 0, phase terms
We have assumed the current (I) along the wire to be constant and solely flowing in z-
axis, because of the length of the wire, which is too small.
I (x
, y
, z
) = Ioz
Where
l = Length of dipole and p =Observation point
Fig 2.3(a) finite length dipole
Fig 2.3 (b) approximation of far field
The pattern of radiation for the dipole of different various lengths are shown in the
below figure 2.4
Increase in length of antenna results in the increase in the Directivity and narrowing of
the beam.
As the dipole length exceeds a wavelength, results in the appearance of extra lobes in
the radiation pattern.
Fig 2.4 radiation pattern of various lengths of dipole
Electric field intensity is given as
E =
]I
Osn0
2s
c
cd
L
x
c
-](ot-kd)
Where
e
o=
Free space permittivity.
C=speed of light.
K =
2n
x
and =2n
2.4.3 Antennas directivity
It is defined as the ratio between the radiation intensity in a specific direction, from an
antenna and radiation intensity transmitted by an ideal isotropic radiator (which
transmits same power in all directions).
Radiation intensity averaged = antennas total power radiated, which is further divided
by 4n. Directivity of a non isotropic source = radiation intensitys ratio, over an
isotropic source.
It is given as
B =
U
U
o
=
4U
P
ad
And directivity as its maximum, is expressed as
B
max= D
O
=
U
max
U
O
=
4U
max
P
ad
Where
0
= mox Jirccti:ity
D represents directivity
U = intensity of radiation (w/unit)
u
mux
= max intensity of radiation (w/unit)
P
ud
= power totally radiated (w)
u
0
= isotropic source radiation intensity (w/unit)
The directivity is unity for an isotropic source.
2.4.4 Antennas bandwidth
It can be defined as the range of frequencies, on all the sides of the centre frequency (for
dipole it is resonant frequency) where the characteristic of antenna like beam width,
polarization, input impedance, radiation pattern, gain beam direction and gain etc, are
present within an acceptable value of those at centre frequency. For an acceptable
broad band antennas operation, it is expressed as the ratio of the upper to lower
frequencies.
Pattern bandwidth associates, beam width, gain, level of the side lobe direction of the
beam and polarization. Whereas bandwidth impedance associates input impedance and
radiation efficiency
2.4.5 Polarization of an antenna
It can be define as the sum of electric field plane, orientation over time projected on to
an imaginary plane, perpendicular to the direction of the motion of radio waves.
This consideration is very important while choosing an antenna for installation in a
specific tag. The antenna converts radio frequency in to electromagnetic signals or
waves and vice versa, which are further transmitted in to space. Thus the electric fields
plane clearly shows or determines the Polarization of these radio waves.
The orientation of these electric fields of radio waves with respect to the surface of the
earth is called as polarization. So we can say that it is determined by antennas physical
structure and its orientation.
A straight wire antenna will have one polarization when it is fixed or mounted in a
vertical direction, and will have different polarization in case, if fixed or mounted in a
horizontal direction.
Polarization is generally affected by reflections. In case of radio waves, ionosphere is
the main common reflector, which causes a change in its polarization, so signals or
waves reflected from an ionosphere cannot be trusted or relied upon.
For communication which is of line of sight, we can fully rely upon polarization.
Classifications of polarizations are briefly discussed below.
Light which is a transverse electromagnetic wave is said to be linearly polarized if it is
present in the form of a plane wave in space. Let us say that if light consists of two
plane waves which are having similar amplitude, and are 9u
0
in phase, then it is said to
be circularly polarized. If the two plane waves have different amplitudes, and are 9u
0
in phase or other then9u
0
, then it is said to be elliptically polarized.
FIG 2.5 shows different types of polarization
2.5 Conjugate Impedance Matching Techniques
These are different techniques on behalf of which the impedance between the tag
antenna and microchip is balanced.
As we know that passive tags microchip get activated by getting the radio frequency
energy from the reader. We are also aware of the fact that these passive microchip or
ICs are highly capacitive so as to store more power which is required to bias the IC
which is further drawn through electromagnetic coupling. Furthermore to match the
input impedance of the tag IC, an antenna should be of a very low resistance value and a
high inductance value.
The perfect impedance matching results in a desirable result value.
It is necessary to mansion that the specific impedance value of the IC is actually the
turn-on impedance value of that IC which is provided by the IC designer or
manufacturers.
Here are several impedance matching techniques which includes
T-MATCHING
GAMMA MATCH
INDUCTIVELY COUPLED LOOP
2.5.1 T-Matching
This matching technique is explained in detail manner in a chapter 2. We have used it,
so far in our project.
T-matching is one of the most balanced and symmetric system.
In the FIG 2.6, T-matching connection as a shunt-matching technique is shown, in
which the radius a, and dipole of length l is connected to the transmission line through
another dipole of radius a and length l where l is less than
The two dipoles i:e smaller dipole and larger dipole are separated by a distance s from
each other whereas the smaller dipole is attached or tapped to the larger dipole by a
distances of l/2 from the centre, and the transmission line is connected to the smaller
dipole in the centre.
In this t-matching connection the two legs are of different sizes and diameter from each
other so we can say that it is a general form a folded dipole.
T-matching network is greatly suited for the used in parallel-conductor transmission
lines due to the fact that it is highly balanced and symmetric system.
Fig 2.6 T-match
2.5.2 GAMMA MATCH
Gamma match is one of the most convenient method to obtain the best match by
connecting the dipole or other antennas such as Yogi etc, to a coaxial cable of 50-ohams
or 75-ohams, as shown in Fig 2.7(a)
Fig 2.7 (a) gamma match
AN EQUIVALENT CIIRCUIT
The equivalent circuit of Gamma match is shown in the Fig 2.7(b).Gamma match
requires a capacitor in series with the Gamma rod and so is Gamma match equivalent to
the half of the T-match.
Fig 2.7(b) equivalent of gamma match
The input impedance is equal to
Z
n
= ]X
c
+
Z
g
|(1 +o)
2
]
2Z
g
+(1 +o)
2
Z
u
Za = centre point free space impedance of the antenna when gamma match connection
is absent.
2.5.3 Inductively coupled loop
In this type of impedance matching technique the dipole is situated in an inductive small
loop, which is further on situated near the main conductor.And the reactance is
controlled by varying the distance between them. Microchip or IC is further more
connected to the terminals of the inductive loop as shown in the Fig 2.8
Fig 2.8 inductive coupled feed and its equivalent circuit
Equivalent inductance is added in the antenna by this type of arrangement
It can be modelled by, transformer,
Impedance resulting on, loops terminals is given as
Z
n
= Z
Ioop
+
(2n]M)
2
z
c
(1)
In the above equation (1)
The total input impedance depends on the loop inductance, I
Ioop
.
Loop input impedance is equal to Z
Ioop
= ]2nI
Ioop
W
l
b
a/2
a/2
d
W
ZA
CA
RA
LA
M
LLoop
CHIP
TERMINALS
Zin
Transformer mutual inductance = M
R
n
(
0
) =
(2n]
0
M)
2
R
A
(]
0
)
(2)
X
n
(
0
) = (2n
0
I
Ioop
) (3)
In equation 3 and 4
The ingoing resistance depends on the distance of the loop and size of the loop.
Antennas resistive impedance = R
A
Mutual inductance of the transformer = M
Inductance of the loop = I
Ioop
For design purpose to match the chip reactance, the loop size is first setup. To control
the reactance after it is being setup, the loop-dipole distance can be adjusted.
Loop fed dipole matching chart. Where,
l =
x
2
, w =
x
100
,w
i
=
w
3
and a = b
CHAPTER 3
DESIGN METHODOLOGY
This chapter gives detail information about the specifically used tag antenna type
(folded dipole), the impedance matching technique (T-matching) and the specific used
tag IC (Alien higgs-2).
3.1 Folded-Dipole antenna
Our goal is achieve a good directional pattern as well as to providing a good matching
to coaxial lines with the impedances, 50-ohms or 75-ohms. Single-wire element length
is usually chosen as
x
4
l < z. Dipole with overall length ofl
x
2
, input impedance of
z
n
7S +]42.S and directivity of
o
1.64S, is widely used.
Single dipole element is used so as to provide better matching characteristics.
Folded wire geometry achieved these characteristics and a very thin (s z) rectangular
loop is formed as shown in the fig 2.1.
Folded dipole is formed when the space between the two larger sides is too small
(s < u.uSz), and it plays the role of step-up impedance transformer.
The below figure 3.1 shows folded dipole with its equivalent models of transmission
line mode and antenna mode.
Fig 3.1 (a) folded dipole = (b) transmission line mode (c) antenna mode
The operating ability of a folded dipole is balanced system, and it can be stated, as we
assumed the decomposition of its current in to two distinct modes which are the
transmission line mode as shown in fig 3.1 (b) and antenna mode as shown in the fig
3.1(c).
Coming to the derivation of an equation for the input impedance we considered the
modelling in the above fig 3.1
The input impedance at the terminals (a - b or e - f), for transmission line mode is
obtained from the below impedance transfer equation
Z
t
= Z
0
j
z
L
+]z
0
tan(kI
|
)
z
0
+]tun(kI
|
)
[ l
i
=
I
2
= ]Z
0
ton(k
I
2
)
Z
L =
u
Z
0
= impedance of two wire transmission line.
Z
0
=
q
n
cos
-1
[
s
2
,
u
=
q
n
ln|
s
2
, +_(
s
2
)
2
-u
2
2
]
Which is approximated for
S
2
o as
Z
0
=
q
n
ln _
s
2
, +
_
[
s
2
2
-u
2
2
_
q
n
ln(
s
o
) = u.7SS p log
10
(
s
u
)
v
2
Is the voltage between point a and b, which is applied to the transmission line of
length
L
2
and the current for the transmission line is given as
I
t
=
I
2
Z
t
Now to form a dipole for an antenna mode, as shown in the fig 3.1 (c) the point of
generators which are c d and g h are both having the same potential, are connected.
Closely space wire pairs (S z) are extended from the feed (g h or c - d) to the
shorter end to form a dipole.
And thus the current for an antenna mode is given as
I
a
=
v
2
Z
d
Z
d
= The input impedance of the linear dipole, of length l, and diameter d
o
c
= equivalent radius which is related to the actual wire radius a, as
a
c
= as
The Expected equivalent radius yields an accurate result, so the total current on the left
side of the folded dipole, feed leg will be
I
n
= I
t
+
I
c
2
=
v
2z
t
+
v
4z
d
=
(2z
d
+z
t
)
4z
t
z
d
And the input impedance on the feed will be
Z
n
=
v
I
in
=
2z
t
(4z
d
)
2z
t
+4z
d
=
4z
t
z
d
2z
d
+z
t
It can be shown that
Z
In
= 4Z
d
When l =
\
2
So this equation shows that the folded dipole impedance is four times greater than that
of the isolated dipole with similar length.
Referring to the below figure 3.2, we can also derived the relation for impedance as
Z
n
= 4Z
d
.
Fig 3.2 (a) folded dipole (b) regular dipole
As we know that for folded dipole the two arm are having identical current and is
shown in the figure, they are closely spaced (S z).
As shown in the fig 3.2 (a), the Regular dipole (b) acts as an ordinary dipole and it is an
equivalent of the folded dipole.
The currents of the two arms of folded dipole are equal to the one arm of ordinary
dipole.
Which is given as
2I
I
= I
d
Equation (a)
Where
I
]
= current of the folded dipole.
I
d
=current of the ordinary dipole.
The power input of the two dipoles are the same or identical and is given as
P
I
1
2
I
2
I
Z
I
= P
d
1
2
I
2
d
Z
d
Now by putting equation (a) in the above equation we get
Z
I
= 4Z
d
Where
Z
I
= folded dipole impedance and Z
d
= ordinary dipole impedance.
Line of Transmission model for folded dipole is test for validity, by making a number of
computations and comparing it with the data obtained by the moment.
Fig 3.3 (a) input resistance of the folded dipole
Fig 3.3 (b) Input reactance of folded dipole
In fig 3.3 (a) and (b) the input resistance and input reactance of the folded dipole is
drawn, as a function of
I
\
, and the diameter of the each wire is d = 2a =0.001z, whereas
the spacing between the elements is s = 0.00613z. Whereas, 300 ohms is the impedance
of such a transmission line.
3.2 T-Matching technique
T-matching is one of the most balanced and symmetric system.
In the fig 2.4 T-matching connection as a shunt-matching technique is shown, in which
the radius a, and dipole of length l is connected to the transmission line through another
dipole of radius a and length l where l is less than < l
The two dipoles i:e smaller dipole and larger dipole are separated by a distance s from
each other whereas the smaller dipole is attached or tapped to the larger dipole by a
distances of l/2 from the centre, and the transmission line is connected to the smaller
dipole in the centre.
In this t-matching connection the two legs are of different sizes and diameter from each
other so we can say that it is a general form a folded dipole.
T-matching network is greatly suited for the used in parallel-conductor transmission
lines due to the fact that it is highly balanced and symmetric system.
Design process for the t-matching is highly related to the folded dipole.
T-matching is muddled by antenna gain and transmission line in the similar manner as
shown for the folded dipole in the fig 3.4. The total input terminal current is divided
between the two conductors and spacing between them.
Antenna mode current division will not be unity due to the fact that the two conductors
are not of the same radius.
Fig 3.4 T-match
3.2.1DESIGN PROCEEDURE
The steps for the design procedure for the T-matching are,
1. Calculate the current division factor using the following relation
=
cosh
-1
(
2
+u
2
+1
2
)
cosh
-1
(
2
+u
2
-1
2u
)
In ()
In()-In (u)
u =
u
u
|
and v =
s
u
|
2. We can write the equivalent radius of two wire arrangement as
ln (o
c
)
1
(u
|
+u)
2
|o
i2
ln o
i
+o
2
lno +2o
i
o ln s]
Since s
1
= 2no
i
, s
2
= 2no so the above equation can be reduced to
ln(o
c
) = ln o
i
+
1
(1+u)
2
(u
2
lnu + 2u ln :))
3. In this step we have to calculate the impedance at input terminal for the transmission
line mode (as shown in fig 3.5 (a)
z
t
= ]z
0
ton(k
I
|
2
)
Fig 3.5(a) shorted transmission line equivalent.
Where,
z
0
= 6ucos
-1
(
s
2
-u
2
-u
|2
2uu
|
) 276log
10
(
s
uu
|
)
z
u
= Two-wire transmission line impedance
a= radius
s = separation between them.
as shown in fig 3.5(b))
FIG 3.5(b) Two wire transmission line
4. The total input impedance is equal to
Z
n
= R
n
+]X
n
=
2z
t
|(1+u)
2
z
c
]
2z
t
+(1+u)
2
z
c
The above equation is proved as
Antenna Impedance Z
n
= (
N
p
N
s
)
2
Z
u
Z
n
i
= (1 +o)
2
Z
u
(1 +o)
2
Z
u
Z
n
=
2z
t(1+o)
2
Z
c
2z
t
+(1+u)
2
z
c
And the input admittance is equal to
n
=
1
z
in
=
c
(1+u)
2
+
1
2z
t
Z
a
=
1
Y
a
Is the input impedance of antenna when T-match connection is absent
2ZT Za
NS
NP
Zin
2Zt Zin
Zin
3.3 tag chip or IC (alien higgs-2)
Higgs-2 is a 2nd generation UHF tag IC which is kept under consideration, so far in our
project. Its an integrated single chip, which performs for a broad range of RFID
applications. This tag has the capability of performing or operating on a very low power
level, and yet it can provide a back scattering signal so as to read the tag at an extended
distance, at a low power level.
Furthermore this tag IC is capable of being programmed at a low radio frequency power.
Fig 3.6 Higgs-2 IC
3.3.1Different features of Higgs-2
It has certificate of conformance for EPCgloble generation 2 specifications. It is used
throughout the world for operation, in RFID UHF bands (860 to 960 MHZ) ,
This IC is featured with 4 unique memory maps, which contained 192-Bits of non-
volatile memory
One of its features is its low power operation for programming as well as reading. Other
includes its long range of operation which is 10 meters using appropriate antenna.
Furthermore it has the ability of accepting all types of commands which may be
mandatory or may be optional, except the command to erase/write.
3.3.2 Condition of Higgs-2 IC operation.
I
A
represents the operating temperature of this IC. The minimum temperature for its
operation is -50c
o
, and which ranges to a maximum range of 80c
o
.
n
Represent its operating frequency which ranges from a minimum of 860MHZ to the
maximum range of 960MHZ.
3.3.3 Electrical characteristics of Higgs-2 IC
These characteristic includes s
P
th
Where
=
4R
c
R
c
|z
c
+z
c
|
2
u 1
The below figure 4.4 shows the radiation pattern for a T-match antenna. It is showing an
Omni directional radiation pattern, which are in the, phi = 0 to phi = 360.
The dipole which is half wave does not have a uniform current distribution over its
length, so at resonance, it is a half sine wave.(centre current is large, which reduces to
zero at its ends).
Fig 4.4 simulated antenna 3-D gain pattern and directivity for (phi=0 to phi=360
degrees)
Field intensity follows a pattern as shown in the above figure 4.4.
Fig 4.5 Impedance (Real & Imaginary values)
Fig 4.6 Voltage standing wave ratio
cos
(
n
2
cos 0)
sIn0
sin 0
The above equation is an approximation for
sin0
which is a better for the field intensity
radiation pattern. The line at the bottom shows that there is maximum radiation s at the
broad side direction of the dipole and it goes on to the direction of the poles, where it is
zero.
These results are obtained for the T-match, since the dipole is placed in a horizontal
direction; therefore the radiation intensity is maximum at the broad side direction and null
or zero at the poles, which makes the antenna linearly polarized.
It provides maximum power to the tag antenna for communication and avoid polarization
miss match.
Impedance
(Ohm)
Return Loss
(dB)
Gain
(dB)
Directivity
(dB)
Theoretical
Read Range
12.8+j143 -56.83. -9 -2 1.5m
Table 4.1 the parameters for the simulated antenna.
0 = c
ud
= antenna radiation efficiency
Where
G = gain of antenna
D = directivity of antenna and c
ud
= radiation efficiency
r
mux
=
x
4n
_
P
t
u
t
u
r
P
th
(a)
=
4R
c
R
c
|z
c
+z
c
|
2
u 1 (b)
The above two equations gives the reading range.
The chip or IC used is Alien Higgs-2 (P
th
= 11 JBm) whereas the reader which is
used is Alien ALR 9650 (p
t
= Su JB onJ 0
t
= 6JBi)
By using the above equations antenna parameters such as reading range and it gain is
calculated .
4.2 T-match antenna design (Morata magic strap (LXMS31ACNA))
The geometric parameters for chip impedance Z = 12-j107 are
L = 163
a = 14.5
b = 8.5
w = 3
w= 1
different parameters of antenna are derived from equations and graphs
4.2.1 Simulation results for T-match
These are the simulations results for Impedance and Return loss factor.
Fig 4.6 antennas return loss simulation results
The below figures shows the radiation pattern for a T-match antenna
Fig 4.7 directivity for (phi=0 degrees to phi=360 degrees)
Fig 4.8 simulated antenna 3-D gain pattern
Fig4.9 shows simulated voltage standing wave ratio
Impedance
(Ohm)
Return Loss
(dB)
Gain
(dB)
Directivity
(dB)
Theoretical
Read Range
12+j109 -30.79 -9 -2 1.5m
4.3 Observations
The T-matching techniques which we had kept under considerations in chapter 4,
consists of different parameters, which have different effects on simulated results.
Different parameters are, length of main dipole (l), length of small dipole (a) and
difference between the small dipole (center point) to large dipole (center point) denoted
by b.
By changing the length of main dipole (l), effect on gain of antenna occurs. Increasing
dipoles length results in increasing gain of antenna.
Increasing the length of small dipole a maximum return loss peaks moves towards low
frequency and vice versa.
Increasing b
4.4 Results Comparison between Higgs-2 and Murata
(LXMS31ACNA) tags IC
The simulation results for Higgs-2 and Murata (LXMS31ACNA) are shown in this
chapter. These results are compared and are mentioned below. Different results for
return loss and voltage standing wave ratio for both the chips are compared.
The impedance IC which is used for the designing of Alien Higgs-2 at 915 MHZ is
equal to 12 ]14u oms where as for Murata (LXMS31ACNA) the impedance IC
used is 12 + j107. The geometric parameters a and b are different for both the chips
where as the length and width are the same. For higgs-2 a = 19mm and b=8.5
whereas for Murata a= 14.5 and b=8.5.
The voltage standing wave value graph shows us that the value for VSWR for Alien
higgs-2 is 1.0031 whereas for Murata (LXMS31ACNA) the VSWR is 1.0598.
The return loss figures shows us that the return loss for an antenna using higgs-2 chip is
-56.8339 dB where as antenna return loss using Murata (LXMS31ACNA) IC is -
30.7437 dB. Simulated results for both the chips are given and shown graphically.
FUTURE WORK AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RFID is one of the most efficient technologies, which provides the modern world with
many beneficial features.
There is much positive vision for the future improvement of this technology, in broad
terms.
Coming towards RFID tags which is our main concern, it can be stated that Besides
using T-matching, which is one of the technique for matching the impedance between
tag IC and tag antenna, other matching techniques such as inductively coupled loop,
gamma match, and nested slot can be used for a perfect impedance matching, and to
get more efficient response.
Also length of the dipole can be minimized (meander dipole), and the size of the tag can
be reduced further in order to make it possible for installment in smaller objects and to
get desirable and efficient results.
The tag chips used in RFID tags can be reduced further in size with greater storage
capability so as to contain as much data as needed.
Current passive RFID tags are designed with limited read range i: e of about 10 feets,
so it can be increased, so as to make it possible for the use in other applications.
RFID tags can more efficiently be designed for use in many complex tracking and
identification purposes such as identifying gas pipe lines or any cable line, in airport
for baggage tracking, in schools and colleges for automatic attendance, and security
etc .
The near modern world is going to be facilitating with this developing technology in
every possible field of their life.
References
[1]. LIMITATIONS OF THE UDA MODEL FOR T-MATCH
ANTENNAS K. R. Demarest and D. D. Deavours\
[2]. Microwave Engineering by D M.Pozar
[3]. UHF RFID Transponder Chip and Antenna Impedance Measurements
Jasmin Grosinger, Christoph F. Mecklenbr auker and Arpad L. Scholtz
Vienna University of Technology
[4]. Antenna design for UHF RFID tags K.V.S. Rao, P.V. Nikitin, and S.Lam,
a review, "IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag.,vol.53,pp.3876
[5]. Design criteria for the RF section of UHF and microwave passive RFID
transponders, EEE Trans. on Microw. Theory and Tech., vol. 53(9)
[6]. T-matching Networks for the Efficient Matching of Practical RFID Tag
J.Choo#1, J. Ryoo#1, J. Hong#1, H. Jeon#1, C. Choi#1and Manos
M. Tentzeris*2# RFID Research Lab., LS Industrial Systems 533 Hogye-dong,
Dongan-gu, Anyang-si,Gyeonggi-do 431-080, Korea1 jychoo@lsis.biz
*Georgia Electronic Design Center, School of Electrical and Computer
Engineering, Georgia. Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0250, USA
[7]. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF UNIVERSAL COMPACT FLEXIBLE UHF
RFID TAG ANTENNAT. G. Abo-Elnaga1, *, E. A. F. Abdallah1 and H. El-
Hennawy
[8]. Systemization of RFID Tag Antenna Design Based on Optimization
Techniques and Impedance matching Charts By Munam Butt
[9]. Antenna Design for Passive RFID tag Author: Lee Pan Shing
[10]. Marrocco_IEEE_2008_(art_of_RFID_antenna_design)
[11]. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OFNOVEL RADIO FREQUENCY
IDENTIFICATION (RFID) TAG STRUCTURES
[12]. A Slim RFID Tag Antenna Design for Metallic Object Applications
(Sung-Lin Chen, Student Member, IEEE, and Ken-Huang Lin, Member, IEEE)