McChrystal Rejects Scaling Down Afghan Military Aims http://ebird.osd.mil/ebfiles/e20091002707075.

html

New York Times

October 2, 2009
Pg. 12

McChrystal Rejects Scaling Down Afghan Military Aims

By John F. Burns

LONDON — The top American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, used a speech here
on Thursday to reject calls for the war effort to be scaled down from defeating the Taliban insurgency to a
narrower focus on hunting down Al Qaeda, an option suggested by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. as part
of the current White House strategy review.

After his first 100 days in command in Kabul, General McChrystal chose an audience of military specialists at
London’s Institute for Strategic Studies as a platform for a public airing of the confidential assessment of the
war he delivered to the Pentagon in late August, parts of which were leaked to news organizations. General
McChrystal, 55, did not mention Mr. Biden or his advocacy of a scaled-down war effort during his London
speech, and referred only obliquely to the debate within the Obama administration on whether to escalate the
American commitment in Afghanistan by accepting his request for up to 40,000 more American troops on top
of the 68,000 already deployed there or en route.

But he used the London session for a rebuttal of the idea of a more narrowly focused war. When a questioner
asked him whether he would support scaling back the American military presence over the next 18 months by
relinquishing the battle with the Taliban and focusing on tracking down Al Qaeda, sparing ground troops by
hunting Qaeda extremists and their leaders with missiles from remotely piloted aircraft, he replied: “The short
answer is: no.”

“You have to navigate from where you are, not from where you wish to be,” he said. “A strategy that does
not leave Afghanistan in a stable position is probably a short-sighted strategy.”

In Washington on Thursday, Gen. David H. Petraeus told an audience that he had “not yet endorsed” General
McChrystal’s specific request for additional troops, even though he has said he supports General
McChrystal’s grim assessment of the war.

General Petraeus, the American commander who oversees the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and works
closely with General McChrystal, was sounding a careful note in public after participating in a three-hour
strategy meeting with Mr. Obama and the administration’s national security team at the White House on
Wednesday. For now, his aides say he does not want to get ahead of the president and the continuing
deliberations.

Speaking with Brian Williams of NBC as part of a two-day conference with newsmakers at the Newseum in
Washington, General Petraeus said that Wednesday’s meeting at the White House was “a very good and
quite long discussion going back and looking at the goals and objectives and assumptions” underlying Mr.
Obama’s Afghanistan strategy that the president announced in March.

At the Institute for Strategic Studies, General McChrystal noted that the former Taliban rulers of Afghanistan
had provided sanctuary to Al Qaeda, from which it planned the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States,
and he said political stability there was vital to regional security, as well as to the security of Britain, the
United States and elsewhere.

Advocating a “counterterrorist focus” in Afghanistan against Al Qaeda, instead of a “counterinsurgency

1 of 2 10/3/2009 2:14 PM
McChrystal Rejects Scaling Down Afghan Military Aims http://ebird.osd.mil/ebfiles/e20091002707075.html

focus” against the Taliban and Al Qaeda, he said, was a formula for what he called “Chaos-istan.” Proponents
of that approach, he said, would accept an Afghanistan in which there was “a level of chaos, and just manage
it from outside.”

The general’s troop request was at the heart of the White House strategy session on Wednesday led by Mr.
Obama, which included Mr. Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, other cabinet secretaries, top
generals, and General McChrystal, participating by videolink from London. The request has come as the
worsening conflict in Afghanistan has prompted increased unease in the United States and Europe.

In an oblique acknowledgment of the tricky political terrain, General McChrystal said there had been no
pressure on him from military superiors to scale down his troop request — a pattern that developed at points
during the Iraq war, when American generals hesitated to call for more troops after the defense secretary,
Donald H. Rumsfeld, ruled them out.

“All of the interaction I’ve had with my senior leadership, they’ve not only encouraged me” to be blunt in
stating his case, the general said, “they’ve insisted on it.”

As if in an afterthought, he added, laughing, that there was no certainty he would always be so free to speak
so plainly. “They may change their minds and crush me some day,” he said.

General McChrystal was named the new American and allied commander in Afghanistan this summer in
succession to Gen. David D. McKiernan, who was removed after barely a year in the job, and retired, when
Mr. Obama and Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates decided they needed a fresh approach.

But direct contact between Mr. Obama and the Afghanistan commander has been rare. Aides in London said
that Wednesday’s teleconference was only the second time since General McChrystal assumed his command
in June that the two men had talked by videolink, a form of contact with field commanders that President
George W. Bush, at the height of the Iraq war, used as often as once a week. Although he was out of
Afghanistan on Wednesday, the aides said, General McChrystal was not invited to attend the White House
strategy session in person.

But judging from General McChrystal’s relaxed demeanor at the session in London, any suggestion he might
be headed for a showdown with the White House over war strategy — for the kind of clash that Gen. Douglas
A. MacArthur had with President Truman during the Korean War — seemed far-fetched. He went out of his
way to say that the White House strategy review was an essential part of developing a successful approach to
the war. “I think the more deliberation and the more debate we have, the healthier that’s going to be,” he
said.

In the war assessment he delivered to the Pentagon, he struck a note of urgency, saying that if the troop
increases he had recommended were not in place within 12 months, the allied effort risked failure. But he told
the London audience that the time being taken by current policy review in Washington was worth it. “I don’t
think we have the luxury of going so fast that we make the wrong decision,” he said.

The general has used his London trip to make a renewed bid for an increase in Britain’s troop commitment in
Afghanistan. With 9,000 soldiers, Britain currently has the second largest coalition contingent after the
Americans. Officials at Britain’s Defense Ministry have said discussions with the Americans have included
the possibility of about 2,500 additional troops in the British contingent.

John F. Burns reported from London, and Alan Cowell from Paris.

2 of 2 10/3/2009 2:14 PM