Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction:
Definitions: Sieve Analysis :
The process of dividing a sample of aggregate into fractions of same particle size is known as Sieve Analysis.
Fineness Modulus :
This is Fineness modulus ,defined as the sum of the cumulative percentages of retained on the sieves of the standard series divided by 100. The standard series consists of the sieves having the opening size 150m,300 m,600 m,1.18 mm,2.36 mm,4.75mm or according to ASTM No. 100,50,30,16,8,4. Fineness Modulus (FM) = Sum of %retained of No. 100,50,30,16,8,4 Sieves 100
Gradation :
Well Graded It contains a good representation of all particle sizes ranging from coarse to fine. The size of the particles are approximately same It consists of mixture of uniform coarse sized
Page 2
Poorly Graded
and uniformly fine sized particles with a break in gradation between two sizes. Any soil not well-graded may be characterized as poorly graded
Uniformity Coefficient, Cu :
Cu = D60 D10 (D30)2 Cc = (D10 X D60 )
Coefficient of Curvature, Cc :
Page 3
Scope :
1. Soil permeability and capillarity are related to effective particle Size. 2. The method of designing inverted filters for dams, levees etc. uses the particle size distribution of the soils involved. 3. The soil identification and classification can be done with this experiment.
Purpose :
1. 2. 3. 4. Getting the particle size distribution of the soil. Getting the gradation curve. Classify the soil. Determine the uniformity coefficient of soil and coefficient of curvature of the soil.
Apparatus :
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Set of Sieves Brush Balance Large Pan Shaking Machine
Large Pan
Balance
Brush
Shaking Machine
Set of Sieves
Page 4
Test Procedures :
Step 1:
Step 2:
Take the weight of the empty sieves with the weighing machine.
#4 Step 3: #8 #12 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Pan
Make sure that all the sieves are clean and assemble them according to lowest to highest sieve opening where the smallest sieve will be set at the bottom.
Page 5
Step 4:
Step 5:
Step 6:
Shake the containers for 10 min with the mechanical shaking machine.
Step 7:
Step 8:
Then disassemble the sieves and take the weight of the individual sieve.
Page 6
Data Sheet
Department of Civil Engineering, BUET Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Sieve Analysis Wt of Container + Soil = 181.5 gm Wt of Container = 81.3 gm Wt of Soil = 100.2 gm Date : 25/11/13 Wt of soil retained (gm) 0 1.3 2.4 7.7 14.8 6.3 28.5 8.5 27 4.5 1.5 102.5
Sieve Opening (mm) 4.75 2.36 1.70 1.18 0.850 0.60 0.425 0.300 0.150 0.075
Wt. of Sieve (gm) 529.7 467.0 448.1 498.9 501.3 457.8 402.7 423.9 365.3 349.7 370.9
Wt of Sieve + soil (gm) 529.7 468.3 450.5 506.6 516.1 464.1 431.2 432.4 392.3 354.2 372.4
% of soil retained 0 1.27 2.34 7.51 14.44 6.14 27.81 8.29 26.34 4.39 1.46
%Finer
100 99 96 89 74 68 40 32 6 1 0
D10 = 0.17 D30 = 0.29 D60 = 0.52 Cu = 1.71 Cz = 0.95 F.M = 2.06
Page 7
Graph :
Page 8
Discussion :
1. The sand contains 20% fine sand , 48% medium and 31% course sand. As the %Finer is less than 50% So this is a course grained soil.(S or G ) 2. As the coarser part is less than 50%, it is a sample of sand.(S) 3. From the analysis it can be seen that the value of co-efficient of curvature Cz = 0.75 which isnt in between 1 and 3 , so the sand is not well graded. In the same way the uniformity coefficient Cu = 1.71 which isnt also greater than 6 . These Both criteria indicates that it is a poorly graded sand. It should be denoted as SP. 4. From visual analysis of the graph it can be said that it is a gap graded gradation curve. 5. The permeability of a soil (cohesion less) is dependent upon its gradation, it is expressed by k = C X (D10)2 which leads to 2.9 X 10-2 for our sample soil. It represents that the soil has a good drainage system and it also indicates that it contains clean sand and gravel. 6. The accuracy of the distribution curve for fine grained soils is more questionable than the accuracy of the curves for the coarser soils. In the case of residual soils the term individual Particle size depends on the disaggregation that imparted mechanically prior to testing.
Page 9