Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Primary Analyst: Qiang Liao, PhD, Beijing (86) 10-6569-2915; qiang.liao@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contacts: Joseph M Leung, Hong Kong 852-2533-3553; joseph.leung@standardandpoors.com Ryan Tsang, CFA, Hong Kong (852) 2533-3532; ryan.tsang@standardandpoors.com
Table Of Contents
Asset Quality Pressure Persists Liquidity Risk Presents A Challenge For Some Banks Capital Pressure May Ease A Bit Triple-Whammy For Profitability Stand-Alone Credit Profiles Underpin Stable Outlook For Sector Related Criteria And Research
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
remain the mainstay of corporate financing, while any spillover effect from rising bond yields on loan pricing has been limited. Authorities' efforts to rein in the rapid growth in shadow banking could have unintended consequences for other parts of the banking system, in our opinion. Shadow banking has played a growing role in China's credit supply, particularly for financing local government projects, property development, and other risky segments. The government has been trying to contain credit supply to these unproductive segments. A drain of credit for these segments may lead to a spike in NPLs.
However, we do not expect a severe spike in NPLs in 2014. The NPL ratio is unlikely to surpass 3% by the year-end, in our view. A stabilizing domestic economy and pragmatic policy responses to deal with emerging risks should limit the rise in NPLs. Key supporting factors are: The Chinese economy has demonstrated signs of a soft landing. We project that it will grow 7.4% in real terms in 2014, versus 7.7% in 2013, which should underpin healthy cash flows for a majority of borrowers. Particularly, the export segment's credit performance is likely to get better as China's export growth recovers along with improving global economic conditions. Overall credit and liquidity supply in China remains accommodative despite policymakers' tighter grip. We expect bank loans to increase at 12%-13% in 2014, while total credit growth could be 15%-16%. Despite the government's concerns about the credit boom in recent years, it has reiterated the necessity to maintain sufficient credit supply to productive sectors.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
China Banking Outlook 2014: A Turbulent Flight Ahead The government has been responsive to recent interbank liquidity stresses. Property sector and local government financing platforms continue to present severe risks for the banking sector. But we expect the government to stay vigilant and quench any credit or liquidity crunch in these segments. Notably, it has recently taken further measures to mitigate refinancing risks of local government platforms. The government has made it easier for banks to write off NPLs. The banking sector has accumulated sizable countercyclical loss reserves over the years (3x NPLs) to deal with a potential increase in NPLs.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
rate will stay at 6%-7% over the next couple of years, indicating "moderate" capitalization, in our view. We anticipate that Chinese banks will need to constantly replenish capital because of their strong credit growth, both on- and off-balance sheet. With profit increases slowing, Chinese banks' retained profits may barely support credit growth of 15% a year without weakening their capitalization. However, a possible slowdown in credit growth and acceleration in asset securitization may offer banks some relief this year. Major Chinese banks are exploring Basel III-compliant subordinated bonds and other hybrid capital instruments to shore up their capital base. The capital structure of these banks is heavily biased toward common equity and retained profits, leaving significant room for regulatory capital enhancement through issuances of hybrid instruments. However, we do not expect these measures to meaningfully strengthen the banks' capitalization this year, given the untested market appetite for such instruments.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
factors in strong credit growth and high financial volatility. We see limited upside to our current sector view. Downside risks may come from significant economic underperformance or unexpected government policies. Such policy risks include an excessive push for consolidation of industries afflicted by overcapacity. This could lead to substantial rises in the banks' credit losses, despite China's still comparatively strong economic growth. A significant shortfall in government support to distressed local government platforms could also trigger a credit crunch in the economy. That said, provided that our sovereign rating on China remains unchanged, the ratings on major Chinese banks may stay largely stable even if we lower our BICRA of China by one notch. This is because Chinese banks' "moderate" capital assessment may then become a neutral rating factor, according to our criteria, and offset the downward pressure owing to a lower anchor rating.
Table 1
Issuer rating
SACP
2013H1 2012A 2013H1 Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. Bank of China Ltd. A/Stable/A-1 bbb1.34 1.16 1.26
A/Stable/A-1
bbb bbb-
1.24 1.27
1.14 1.18
0.95 1
0.97 0.93
-1.31 -1.23
-1.31 -1.4
9.28 11.2
10.54 11.24
76.92 80.98
78.72 79.05
Bank of A-/Stable/A-2 Communications Co. Ltd. Bank of Nanjing Co. Ltd. China Construction Bank Corp. BBB-/Stable/A-3 A/Stable/A-1
bbbbbb-
1.28 1.66
1.28 1.47
0.96 0.99
0.9 1.02
-1.69 -1.68
-1.79 -1.72
10.64 10.66
12.13 11.32
56.41 66.63
63.09 66.23
China Merchants BBB+/Stable/A-2 bbb Bank Co. Ltd. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Co. Ltd. A/Stable/A-1 bbb
1.46 1.53
1.46 1.44
0.69 0.89
0.61 0.87
-1.51 -1.65
-1.59 -1.68
8.12 10.48
8.49 10.62
75.61 65.05
75.59 64.53
BBB+/Stable/A-2 bbb-
1.17
1.17
1.06
0.79
-1.3
-1.56
8.48
8.97
70.91
72.83
Table 2
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Table 2
Institutional framework High risk Competitive dynamics Systemwide funding High risk Very low risk
Related Research
A Key Test Case Looms For China's Shadow Banking System, Jan. 24, 2014 How Risky Is The Spike In China's Public Debt?, Jan. 23, 2014 Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment: China, Jan. 9, 2014 2014 Asia-Pacific Financial Institutions Outlook: Rising Private-Sector Leverage May Overshadow Banks' Performance Amid Softer Economic Prospects, Dec. 10, 2013
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Copyright 2014 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT