0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
66 Ansichten5 Seiten
The textures of soils are designated by conventional or colloquial names. Definite standards for these textural grades were established by :Vhitney. At rhc University of California the analytical ''ark necessary for textural naming has followed two methods.
Originalbeschreibung:
Originaltitel
FIELD TEXTURES AND PHYSICAL COMPOSITION DETERMINED BY TWO METHODS OF MECHANICAL ANALYSIS
The textures of soils are designated by conventional or colloquial names. Definite standards for these textural grades were established by :Vhitney. At rhc University of California the analytical ''ark necessary for textural naming has followed two methods.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
The textures of soils are designated by conventional or colloquial names. Definite standards for these textural grades were established by :Vhitney. At rhc University of California the analytical ''ark necessary for textural naming has followed two methods.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
DETERMINED BY TWO METHODS OF MECHANICAL ANALYSIS CHAS. F. SHAW (University of California, R"keley, California, U.S.A.) The textures of soils are u5ually designated by conventional or colloquial names, such as sandy loam, loam, clay loam, clay, adobe clay, and .the like, that have been established by general usage. Definite standards for these textural grades were established by \:Vhitney (7, 8) as a result of the correlation between the textural names and the laboratory analyses of several thousand samples sent in by Lhe ficlt.l men. \\Then the mean composition of each texture had been established, the mechanical analyses were thereafter used to check dc\iations and to hold men working in the various parts of the country to relatively close standards of textural designations. At rhc University of California the analytical '''ark necessary for g-uidance in the textural naming of soils has followed two methods. The first of these, used from 1913 to Hl30, followed the centrifuge method originally de\eloped by the Bureau 'Of Soils (2, 3). Ammonia was used as the dispersing agent, tht soils being shaken for 12 to lR hours, then bv decantation from the shaker bottles the silts and days were from the sands. The clays were separated from the silts by repeated decanting after accelerated sedimentation in a centri- fuge. The upper limit of " clay " as determined by this ammonia- centrifuge method was fhc microns, and " silt " was fifty microns, the separations being chccl.:cd by microscopic measurements of sus- pended materials. The second method, which has been used for selected analyses si11cc Hl30, is a mmlilication of the International met!1od (G). The soils arc prctrcntl'd with hydrof,'"en pcroxidc and hydrochloric acid, shaken with sodium oxalate as a dispersant, washed through a 300 mesh sieve to separate the sands, and the !iilt and clays determined by pipette sampling-. The \'icld of clavs b\ the modilicd-lntcrnational method was much higher th.an by the 3mn;onia-etntrifuge method, and the former could not be used in checking the textural name!' as established by the field men. From time to time thr rcsuhs of analvsl:!s by the two methods \vere compared, but there did not !'cem to be a difference in the ,iclds of the finer fractions . . In order to dctcrmine the differences in results, and to settle ques- tions regarding the consistence with which textural grades 1vere being usetl, sixty-four samples of surface soils from the Lodi and Napa soil survey areas (unpublished), which had been suveyed by the same two men, worldng together, were analyzed by both methods. ln order to , make the comparisons direct, the upper limit of the silt fraction was hdd at GO microns anrl of the clay at 5 microns in the modified-Inter- national ns "ell as in the methods. The results of the analyses were plotted on the triangular diagram of Davis and Bennett (1). Ten of the soils had been classed by the field men .as .sandy Joams, 14 as learns, 27 as clay learns, and 14 as clays. Tht! ammon in-centrifuge analyses showed that all of the sandy loams had a physical composition that classed them properly in that tc:..:turnl grade as established by the Bureau of Chemistry and Soils.
' " '
t f [,
ii;
. : I a lc le
CLAV LOAM.S
I / .... .... .... lb
ld .. .. II
.. u- .. - \. " \
""
liLY
.. L ,;,
' I ,\ \ 4 .- " .. "
" .. UlJ ! FIG. !.-Differences in physical composition indicated by two methods or mechanical analysis. 1'he butt of the arrow indicates the composition as determined by the ammonia-centrifuge method, while the poinl shows the composition of the same soil when analyzed by the modified-lnternationa.l method. In-Analyses of 10 soils call!!d sandy loams. lb-Analvses of 14 soils called loams. lc-AnalYses of 2i soils called clay learns. Id-Analyses of 14 soils called days. le-Average analyses of each of the lour textural grades. If-The triangular diagram shov.-ing the composition area textural grade. assigned to each Of the learns, however, only 6 were properly named learns and all of these were very heavy textured, lying close to the day loams, Two of the 11 Joams " fell within the sandy clay loam textures, 5 in the clay Joams, and 1 was a light day. Of the 27 clay learns, 14 analyzed as clay loam, 1 as n loam, 3 as sandy clay learns, 2 as silty clay loams, I as a silty clay, and li as light clays. Of the 14- clays, 13 analyzed as clays and 1 as a silty clay. From these studies it became apparent that from the standpoint of mechanical analysis the field men were inclined to name the soils of intermediate textures in one grade too coarse., light clay learns being judged as learns and light clays as clay learns. None of the so-ca1led 11 clay learns," however, fell far outside the clay loam portion of the triangular diagram, whereas several of the " learns " were well away from the loam section. The clays and sandy learns were consistently named. This " drift " in the judgment of textures appears to be due to a tendency to make the determination compara- tive. When working in a region of dominantly heavy soils, the sandier soils are often named in a textural grade that is too light or coarse, whereas in a region of dominantly sandy sqBs, many soils of finer r x ~ ture arc often designated by a grade heavier or finer than their composition would warrant. The marked difference jn yield of the fines, the silt and clay, due to different methods of analysis is shown by the arrows jn the triangular diagrams in Fig. 1, and the average change is shown in Fig. Je and in Table 1. Under the more severe treatment of the modified-Inter- TABLE I Average composiliqn of texlur;LJ grades by the ammonia-centrifuge and the modified International methods or anPlys!s, Sandv loams (10) Loams (1 4) Clay loams (27) Clays (H) Cent. 1nt. Cent. Int. Cent. 1nt. Ce:nt. Int. Sands Silts Clays n2!i4 228u Hsa fi22ii 2835 ] 959 - lO<l!l + 550 + 4'76 4H9 3389 21-53 3439 3693 288!1 - HJ:IIJ + 304 + 730 :1477 3815 27-32 :!227 3872 39-12 -12!i0 + 057 + 11-BO 208(i 3HU 4501 1 2 17 2583 61 82 - 869 - 763 + 1681 national method the sandy learns lost an average of over 10 per cent. of the sands (as shown by the ammonia-centrifuge method), this material being nearly evenly distributed between the silt and clay. The loams likewise show an average loss over I 0 per cent. of the sands, but most of this material was shifted to the clay fraction, only about one-third becoming silt. The 27 clay learns show an average decrease of 12'5 per cent. of sands, a very small amount being- added to the silt fraction and practically all going into the clay. The clay soils lost 87 per cent. of their sands, and 76 per cent. of silt, all of the material falling into the clay fraction. This shift of textures from the sandy learns to the clays is shown by the open arrows on the triangular diagrams and in Fig. Ie, and emphasizes the difficulty that will probably be encountered in any endeavor to intercept the field texture by using the International method of mechanical analysis. Field texture expresses not the actual or ultimate texture of the soil, but ratl1er a combination of texture and of the structure or degree. of aggregation. The International method in its fundamental purpose aims to break down all structural aggregates and to resolve the soil into its individual particles. Since the structure of the soil depends to a considerable extent upon its chemical composition and on its changeable base status, the field texture cannot be expected to be directly reflected by the ultimate texture. Methods of mechanical analysis that are not sufficiently drastic to break down all of the aggre- gates but which resolve only the less stable aggregates Into their ultimate particles will give a better measure of the mechanical com- position of the field grades. It is very doubtful if mechanical analysis by the International method will permit an interpretation of textural grades on the basis of a triangular diagram or even in a three-dimen- siollal figure. The drift of the analyses, as shown in the diagrams in Fig. 1 1 would also indicate the grave difficulty in endeavouring to adjust mechanical analysis by the International method with the standards established by the ammonia-centrifuge method. Prescott (4) and Tommerup (6) have each endeavored to develop such adjustments. Apparently they have assumed that the yield of clay under the methods in use by the Bureau of Soils prior to 1925 was comparable to the yield of clay by the International method and that therefore a com- parison could be made between soils analyzed by the different methods. The marked difference in dispersion due to the use of ammonia in one method and the usc of a sodium compound following severe pretreat- ment in the other makes such conversions of results thoroughly unsatis- factory. If a standardization of field texture is to be accomplished by means of the International method, it can only be done by accumulating several thousand analyses of soils whose textural grade has been mined in tl1e field by men worlting in close co-operation and who have maintained consistent standards for their grade separations. In view of the tendency to drift toward.s lighter or heavier designations, as shown by the two men working in California, both of whom had years of experience in the field, consistence in textural designations can only be maintained by frequently checking textural judgment by comparing field samplc>fi with soils that have been selected as textural standards or by means of mechanical analyses that follow the meth9d of disper- sion by usc of ammonia without pre1reatment, by which the first textural standardizations were established. LITERATURE 1 Dt\\-'IS, R. 0, E., and BENNETT, H. H., 1927. U.S. Dept, Agr,, Circ. 419. L. J., Mt\RTJS, F. 0., nnd PEARCE, j. R., 1904. U.S. Depl. Agr., Bur, Soils, Rul. 24. Ft.ErCHER, C. C., nnd BRYAN, H., 1912. U..S. Dept. Agr., But, Soih', Bul. 84. PRF.SCOTT, J, A., TA\'LOR, J. K., and MARSHALL, T. ]., 1934 rlu Sol, 1'rn11s. First Comm., Int. Soc, Soil Sci., pp. 14J-15S. OLMSTEAD, L. B., ALEJW\DER, L. T., and MIDDLETON, H. E., 1930. U.S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 170. . 1 TOMMiiRUP, E. C., 1934 Pltylique du Sol, Tr1m.r. First Comm., Int. Soc. Soil Sci., pp. t5o-158. J WHI'rNEV, MILTON, tgo6, "The Soil Survey Field Book." U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Soils. WHJTNF.Y, MILTON, tgn. U.S, Dept. Agr., Buro Soils, Bul. 78. FLOTATION APPLIED TO THE STUDY OF SOIL COLLOIDS N.K. KRUPSKY .. (a.boratory _of Soil Chemistry-Chief A. N. Sokolovsky; Khorkov) ..... --'-- --- Purpose of this investigation was to thid the metliods- .dif- ferential study of soil colloids and to the contrOl:iof the pro- cesses of interaction of soil colloids. It has been fOurld :that: l. The behaviour of different fractions of soil 'colloids on the dividing surface separating two liquids, of Which one is more polar than the other, is not the same. Under corresponding conditions organic colloids are easily wetted by less polar liquids, -wheri leaving a hydrous medium. Mineral colloids are more easily wetted by more polar liquids (in this case with water) and always in hydrous phase. 2. At or near the neutral reaction the particles of humus soil are not wetted by faintly polar liquids: During the process. of acidifica- tion, humus rapidly becomes hydrophobic, and below the limit of coagu- lation, the humus entirely passes into non-hydrous phase. During the process of acidification the double electrical layer is progressively destroyed, which facilitates the wetting of the surface of humus particle by faintly polar liquids. Wetting with non-polar ljquids and the re- moval of humus from the hydrous medium may also be brought about in neutrnl or alkaline conditions. To do this a third liquid be added to a system of hydrous and non-hydrous phases i this third liquid mixing in any proportions with either liquid composing the system (such as ethyl alcohol, acetone, etc.). By replacing water in hydrated film of micella, this liquid facilitates the wetting of the surface of a humus particle with faintly polar liquid. Highly alkaline humus also partly passes into the non-hydrous phase, even without applying an auxiliary dehydrator. Hence it is obvious that humus is a typical hydrophobic colloid. Most of the surface of the humus particle must be of carbon-like properties. 3. The passing of humus into the non-hydrous phase owing to the process of acidification can be brought about gradually. At the begin- ning, at lower concentration of H ions, particles richer in carbon and free of mineral admixture are isolated, they are followed by the fraction richer in nitrogen and, as a rule, with considerable mineral admixture. No connexion bet\\-'een the sequence of removal and the grade of dis- pcrsitY of garticles was established. 4-. The addition of neutral electrolytes does not effect complete separation of humus sol into the non-hydrous phase. As the tion by neutral electrolytes causes a considerable decrease of hydrated