Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Presenting problem: what brought the individual to therap now! Advantages 1. #lient leads: chooses direction of interview 2. $a get information not accessible other wa s %. &herapist appears more responsive '. #lient can provide more info (. $a ma)e client more comfortable *isadvantages 1. &herapist ma in+ect bias ,as) leading questions: e-: *I*. 2. $a miss important information / or info needed to ma)e correct diagnosis %. #lient0therapist ma stra off topic1 waste time 2 energ
".
#.
II.
3tructured ,*iagnostic. Interview A. ". Format: as) specific questions in a particular order1 mirrors *3$ Advantages 1. 4et the important information / needed to ma)e correct diagnosis 2. Assure that therapist has covered all criteria %. 5ecessar for research *isadvantages 1. &ime6consuming to rule out other disorders 2. $a miss detail important to client %. #lient ma feel less heard1 less engaged1 communicate less '. 5o etiolog 7 focus is onl on s mptoms1 diagnosis
#.
III.
Ps chological &esting
8 9eview: characteristics of a good test 8 9eliabilit : is it consistent! Produce the same result each time! 0 "etween administrations! 8 :alidit : does it measure what it is supposed to measure! A. Inventories / sub+ective tests1 forced choice. ,$$PI 621 / the questions form 2262;1 empiricall / derived <scales= / )ept questions that separated the groups1 face validit . For e-ample / <evil spirits possess me= / to chec) schi>ophrenia... 1. *efinition: ob+ective tests / ,Fa)e good1 fa)e bad / invalid then1 balidit scale / if we are tr ing to lie. 8 3tructured 8 Forced choice format ,&0F or 1 / (. 8 Use pen 2 paper 8 #an administer in groups or individuall
2.
& pes a. b. I? ,Intelligence.: assess general functioning Personalit 2 Ps chological Problems 1. $$PI / $innesota $ultiphasic Personalit Inventor a. b. ((@ questions
*esigned to discriminate b0w <normals= 2 ps chiatric groups Ampiricall derived scales 8 &oo) large pool test items: give to 2 groups ,patients0non6patients. 8 Bept those items that clearl differentiated b0w 2 groups ,3ome items donCt seem to ma)e sense but still differentiate. 8 *ifferent groups of patients respond differentl to the same Items 7 creates a different <profile= for different disorders 1D 2D #linical scales: 1@ diagnostic groups :alidit scales: detect suspicious response patterns 8 <Fa)e good= 8 <fa)e bad= no response
2. c. #.
Pro+ective tests 7 used b ps choanal tic ,Freudian. practitioners 1. *efinition: pro+ect ,unconscious. needs1 desires1 conflicts onto ambiguous stimuli ,can be interpreted multiple wa s. 8 3ub+ective 8 Unstructured 8 Administered individuall & pes a. 9orschach / ,different people can see different things.. 1. 3 mmetrical in)blots1 blac) 2 white0color 2. 3core on % measures: location, content, determinants &A&: &hematic Apperception &est / ,the picture1 of the woman and man.. 1. Pictures: show ambiguous scenes / as) to generate stories: 2. Avaluate: structure1 content of storiesE behavior of stor teller
2.
b.
c.