Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1o
.
This is a non linear model, but by taking logs on both sides you get
ln(1 ) = ln() +cln(1) + (1 c) ln() ,
which is linear in the log variables. Estimating this model requires transforming it into a linear model. You
must generate new variables
j = ln(1 )
/ = ln(1)
: = ln()
and estimate
j
I
= ,
0
+,
1
/
I
+,
2
:
I
+-
I
,
which is just a multiple linear regression model. In this case, ,
0
= ln(), ,
1
= c and ,
2
= 1 c.
Notice that in this way you can test whether some production function exhibits constant returns to scale by
H
0
: ,
1
+,
2
= 1.
If we want to estimate the parameters of the model without bias and in a consistent way using OLS,
then we require that 1 (-
I
j/
I
, :
I
) = 0. This means that in the original Cobb-Douglas production function
2
In the data this relationship does not hold well in levels, but if you replace W
i
with ln (W
i
), then the relationship is very
tight. In one of the following subsections you will see how to tackle such a model.
2
1 = 1
o
1o
, there is actually an additional multiplicative term c
:i
such that 1 = 1
o
1o
c
:
. It is
useful to think about what might justify this additional term. Usually it is assumed to be a technological
shock. It is also important to notice that given 1 (-
I
j/
I
, :
I
) = 0, 1 (c
:
j1, ) is not c
0
= 1. The reason is that
a zero mean error inside a convex function (the exponential) has a level eect. If - is normally distributed
around zero, i.e. -
0, o
2
:
, then 1 (c
:
j1, ) = c
1
2
c
2
"
1.
The interpretation of the coecients in the log-log model is that of elasticities. After all, the elasticity
of 1 with respect to 1 is dened as
j
,|
=
01
01
1
1
=
d ln(1 )
d ln(1)
ln(1 )
ln(1)
.
Remember: log dierences are approximately percent changes
ln(1 ) = ln(1
2
) ln(1
1
)
1
2
1
1
1
1
=
1
1
.
So in our Cobb-Douglas model increasing 1 by 1 percent will increase 1 by ,
1
percent.
3 Half-log models
These are models of the type
1
I
= c
o
0
+o
1
i+:i
.
This is a non linear model, but by taking logs on both sides you get
ln(1
I
) = ,
0
+,
1
A
I
+-
I
. (1)
As with the log-log models, you need to create the log variables from the original ones, j = ln(1 ), and
estimate
j
I
= ,
0
+,
1
A
I
+-
I
The interpretation of the coecients again depends on the point at which the marginal eects are eval-
uated. The eect of A on 1 in 1 is a "half elasticity":
,
1
=
0 ln(1 )
0A
ln(1 )
A
.
This means that a change in one unit of A will result in a change of ,
1
percent in 1 . But the level eect is
going to be
01
0A
= ,
1
c
o
0
+o
1
i
,
which depends on A. I conveniently assumed that -
I
= 0. In practice, you will need to assume something
about what is -
I
, but let us not get into this right now.
When making expectations about levels we must take into account the fact that the zero mean error has
non-zero eects on the level of the left hand side variable, in a similar way to what we saw above in the
log-log model.
3
Example: The Mincer model of human capital accumulation and wages. This model gives rise to a
wage equation that is half log:
\
I
= c
o
0
+o
1
i+o
2
2
i
+o
3
Si+:i
,
where \
I
are wages, A
I
is experience and o
I
is years of schooling (what labor economists call "invest-
ment in human capital"). Taking logs we obtain
ln\
I
= ,
0
+,
1
A
I
+,
2
A
2
I
+,
3
o
I
+-
I
.
This model combines both the half log and polynomial.
Another form of half-log models is
1
I
= ,
0
+,
1
ln(A
I
) +-
I
. (2)
You need to create the log variables from the original ones, r = ln(A), and estimate
1
I
= ,
0
+,
1
r
I
+-
I
.
The interpretation of ,
1
depends on the point at which the marginal eect are evaluated. The eect of
A on 1 is
,
1
=
01
0 ln(A)
1
ln(A)
.
This means that a change of 1 percent of A will result in a change in ,
1
units of 1 . But the level eect is
going to be
d1
dA
= ,
1
1
A
.
4 Models with dummy variables and interactions
Models with dummy variables and interactions are also non-linear models. See Lecture 12.
4