Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
M0 CO D, WC W0* 1i2 benefit monitoring and evaluation Communication and Works Department community development community organization country strategy and program Dera "$azi #$an Department of %rrigation and !o&er DO'WM Directorate of On('arm Water Management deep turbine tube &ell e+ecuting agency economic internal rate of return financial services $ectare implementing agency kilometer local government ordinance nongovernment organization .ational ,ural upport !rogram operation and maintenance !C, pro/ect completion revie& !un/ab Economic ,esearc$ %nstitute pro/ect management unit savings and credit organization special dra&ing rig$ts &atercourse &ater users association NOTES
)$e fiscal year 1'32 of t$e "overnment and its agencies ends on 45 6une7 8'39 before a calendar year denotes t$e year in &$ic$ t$e fiscal year ends: e7g7: '3;<<<=555 ends on 45 6une =5557 %n t$is report: 8>9 refers to 0 dollars7
1ii2
-i?un 6in: Operations ; 67 Miranda: Central and West *sia Department 1CW,D2 !7 -7 'edon: Country Director: !akistan ,esident Mission 1!,M2: CW,D M7 7 $afi: !ro/ect %mplementation Officer: !,M: CW,D .7 ul %slam: *ssociate !ro/ect *nalyst: !,M: CW,D
CONTENTS Page B* %C D*)* M*! %7 %%7 !,O6EC) DE C,%!)%O. E@*-0*)%O. O' DE %". *.D %M!-EME.)*)%O. *7 ,elevance of Design and 'ormulation B7 !ro/ect Outputs C7 !ro/ect Costs D7 Disbursements E7 !ro/ect c$edule '7 %mplementation *rrangements "7 Conditions and Covenants C7 Consultant ,ecruitment and !rocurement % !erformance of Consultants: Contractors: and uppliers 67 !erformance of t$e Borro&er and t$e E+ecuting *gency #7 !erformance of t$e *sian Development Bank E@*-0*)%O. O' !E,'O,M*.CE *7 ,elevance B7 Effectiveness in *c$ieving Outcome C7 Efficiency in *c$ieving Outcome and Outputs D7 !reliminary *ssessment of ustainability E7 %mpact O@E,*-- * E ME.) *.D ,ECOMME.D*)%O. *7 Overall *ssessment B7 -essons C7 ,ecommendations ii vii ; ; ; 4 A A B B B D E E < < < ;5 ;; ;; ;= ;4 ;4 ;F ;A
%%%7
%@7
*!!E.D%GE ;7 !lanned and *c$ieved Outputs of t$e !ro/ect =7 Categories of Community Development ubpro/ect 47 Completion Dates of ,ural ,oads under t$e Dera "$azi #$an ,ural Development !ro/ect F7 *c$ievement under t$e 'inancial ervices Component A7 *ppraised and Completed Costs of t$e !ro/ect B7 Contract *&ards and Disbursements D7 %mplementation c$edule E7 tatus of Compliance &it$ -oan Covenants <7 Economic and 'inancial *nalyses ;57 !ro/ect 'rame&ork
BASIC DATA
A. Loan Identi ication ;7 =7 47 F7 A7 B7 D7 B. Country -oan .umber !ro/ect )itle Borro&er E+ecuting *gency *mount of -oan !ro/ect Completion ,eport .umber !akistan ;A4; Dera "$azi #$an ,ural Development %slamic ,epublic of !akistan !un/ab !lanning and Development Department D,=B75BE million !C,H!*# <<E
Loan Data ;7 *ppraisal Date tarted Date Completed =7 -oan .egotiations Date tarted Date Completed Date of Board *pproval Date of -oan *greement Date of -oan Effectiveness %n -oan *greement *ctual .umber of E+tensions Closing Date %n -oan *greement *ctual .umber of E+tensions )erms of -oan %nterest ,ate Maturity "race !eriod <7 )erms of ,elending 1if any2 %nterest ,ate Maturity "race !eriod econd( tep Borro&er
=D May ;<<D F 6une ;<<D =E 6uly ;<<D 45 6uly ;<<D F eptember ;<<D ;B October ;<<D ;F 6anuary ;<<E ;= 6anuary ;<<E .one 4; December =55F 4; May =55D = ;75I 4A years ;5 years ;75I 4A years ;5 years .ational ,ural upport !rogram: >=7D million at ;575I: repayable ; year after pro/ect completion
47 F7 A7
B7
D7
E7
iii
E ecti#e Date ;= 6anuary ;<<E b7 Categor$ or S!bloan No. 5;* 5;B 5;C 5= 54* 54B 54C 54D 5F 5A Total ;57 ( *mount 1 D, million2 Original Allocation ;7A<4 B7FFF <7D54 =7;55 57;FA ;75EB ;7FFE 57BA= ;7=4; ;7BBB =B75BE -ocal Costs 1'inanced2 *mount 1> million2 ( !ercentage of -ocal Costs ( !ercentage of )otal Cost Net Amo!nt A#ailable ;7A<4 B7FFF <7D54 =7;55 57;FA ;75EB ;7FFE 57BA= ;7=4; ;7BBB =B75BE Amo!nt Disb!rsed 57DDD 47D<A ;;7F4B =75=D 57=E= 57DD< ;7AB; 57F=F 5745A 57555 =;74ED %ndisb!rsed Balance 57E;B =7BF< ;7D44 575D4 157;4D2 5745D 157;;42 57=4= 57<=B ;7BBB F7BE; Original Closing Date 4; December =55F Time Inter#al E4 mont$s
C.
Pro&ect Data ;7 !ro/ect Cost 1> million2 A''raisal Estimate ;=7< 4<74 A=7= Act!al ;57A 4E7; FE7B
Cost 'oreign E+c$ange Cost -ocal Currency Cost Total =7 'inancing !lan 1> million2
Cost %mplementation Costs Borro&er('inanced *DB('inanced Beneficiary('inanced Total %DC Costs Borro&er('inanced *DB('inanced Ot$er E+ternal 'inancing Total
A''raisal Estimate D7; 4F7; <7; A574 575 ;7< 575 A=7=
iv
47 Cost Breakdo&n: by !ro/ect Component 1> million2 A''raisal Estimate A75 ;D7= ;F74 47; F7E ;7D F7= ;7< A=7= !ro/ect c$edule Act!al 47D ;47D =47F =7E F7B 575 575 57F FE7B
Com'onent %rrigation Development Community Development ,ural ,oads ,ural 'inance %nstitutional upport !$ysical Contingencies !rice Contingencies %nterest during Construction Total F7
Item A''raisal Estimate Act!al Date of Contract &it$ Consultantsa Contract &it$ ."O E 'ebruary ;<<< Contract &it$ Design Consultant ; 6anuary =555 Contract &it$ Construction upervision Consultant = October =554 Contract &it$ Baseline urvey Consultants =; 'ebruary =555 Contract &it$ %mpact Evaluation Consultants =; May =55A Civil Works Contract Date of *&ard 1first contract2 A *pril =554 Completion of Work 1last contract2 45 .ovember =55B E?uipment and upplies !rocurement Dates 'irst !rocurement ;5 October ;<<E -ast !rocurement =E Marc$ =55B Ot$er Milestones 'ormation of 'irst MenKs CO ; 'ebruary ;<<< 'ormation of 'irst MenKs CO ;= 'ebruary ;<<< 'ormation of 'irst MenKs C)W"LW0* =4 'ebruary ;<<< 'ormation of 'irst WomenKs CO D 'ebruary ;<<< 'ormation of 'irst WomenKs CO D 'ebruary ;<<< CO J community organization: C)W" J community tube&ell group: ."O J non(governmental organization: CO J savings and credit organization: W0* J &ater users organization A7 !ro/ect !erformance ,eport ,atings Ratings Im'lementation Period ;= 6an ;<<E4; Dec =55A ; 6an =55B=E 'eb =55B ; Mar =55B4; Mar =55D J satisfactory: 0 J unsatisfactory De#elo'ment Ob&ecti#es Im'lementation Progress 0
D.
Data on Asian De#elo'ment Ban( )issions Date E=; Mar ;<<B D;; Oct ;<<B ;A=D .ov ;<<B =D 'eb;F Mar ;<<B =A *pr; May ;<<D =D MayF 6un ;<<D A;; 6an ;<<< ;< *pr =555 =D=< .ov =555 =;=A 6an =55= =A=< .ov =55= ;D=F 'eb =55F =A *ugE ep =55F D;B Dec =55F =B4; Dec =55A ;=;D 6un =55B ;= Dec =55B;5 'eb =55D No. o Persons = ; ; B = = 4 = = = = = = = ; ; 4 No. o Person+Da$s 4F A ;4 <B ;F ;E =; = B ;5 ;5 ;B 45 =5 B B BD S'eciali*ation o )embers a: m a a a: c: d: e: f: m a: c a: c g: e: l $: i i: / b: l b: l k: l k: l k: l k k k: l: m
Name o )ission )* fact(finding )* inception )* revie& -oan fact(finding -oan post(fact(finding -oan appraisal -oan inception pecial loan administration -oan revie& ; -oan revie& = -oan revie& 4 -oan revie& F -oan midterm revie& -oan revie& A -oan revie& B -oan revie& D !ro/ect completion revie&
a J senior pro/ect engineer: b J senior pro/ect implementation officer: c J program officer: d J pro/ect specialist: e J pro/ect economist: f J social development specialist: g J rural development specialist: $ J resident representative: i J senior program officer: / J senior control officer: k J pro/ect implementation officer: l J pro/ect analyst: m J staff consultant7: )* J tec$nical assistance
vi
vii
History
+he city &as foun e at the close of the 15th century an name after -a&a$ Ghazi Khan 0irrani, son of -a&a$ ?a#i Khan 0irrani, a Balochichieftain, &ho ha eclare in epen ence from the 1anghi Dynasty 7ultans of 0ultan. +ogether &ith t&o other Deras i.e. settlements, Dera *smail Khan an Dera @ateh Khan, it ga!e its name to Dera#at. Dera#at e!entually came into the possession of the British after the 7i%h Aar in 18'( an &as i!i e into t&o istricts9 Dera Ghazi Khan an Dera *smail Khan. )fter the partition of *n ia, many of the city.s ?in u resi ents settle in Dera&al -agar colony of Delhi, *n ia.B1C +he istrict of Ra#anpur &as later car!e out of the Dera Ghazi Khan istrict. 7ome of them also settle in !arious part of *n ia, inclu ing Bhi&ani, Delhi, 5hansi, Ranchi, )m$ala an ?ari &ar. Dera Ghazi Khan &as foun e in 15th century $y )mar a +ri$al 7ar ar of 0irani tri$e. +he ol city of Dera Ghazi Khan &as situate at the istance of 16 miles 81; %m> to&ar s east of the present city. *n 1(68, the ol city of Dera Ghazi Khan &as a$olishe ue to hea!y floo in the ri!er *n us. Resultantly the e/isting city of Dera Ghazi Khan &as came into $eing in the year 1(16. +he city is i!i e into ifferent $loc%s. +he British ruler esta$lishe colonial system in the continent an eclare D.G. Khan as istrict in the year 18'(. General Court 1an &as appointe as first Deputy Commissioner of this District. Keeping in !ie& the rapi ly increasing population of the area an eteriorating la& an or er situation istrict D.G. Khan &as i!i e in t&o istricts i.e. D.G. Khan an Ra#anpur. "resently there are t&o re!enue su$ i!ision of the District. ) tri$al $eltDpolitical area sprea along &ith &estern si e of the District.
Historical growth
Dera Ghazi Khan city of 7ohail 1eghari is situate on the &estern $an% of the *n us ri!er. *t &as foun e $y a Balouch ruler, na&a$ ?a#i Khan 0irrani, also calle 0irani Balouch, in 1'7;E he name the to&n after his son Ghazi Khan 0irrani. *n those ays, game a$oun e near Dera Ghazi Khan an the fiel s &ere green. ?a#i Khan 0irrani &as a great cattle o&ner an &as attracte to
the site $y the plentiful supply of grass. *t &as %no&n as FDera "hoolan +ha 7ehraG ue to plenty of gar ens an %astori canal, supplie $y the *n us ri!er. *n 1(6(416, this cra le of 0irrani ci!ilisation &as inun ate $y the *n us. )t that time, there &as a population of a$out =:,7:1. +he present to&n &as $uilt 16 miles 81; %m> from the ol to&n. *t &as lai out on a gri pattern comprising ;; $loc%s &ith &i e long roa s an streets. +&o open spaces &ere planne in each $loc% for social gatherings. 7ome of these ha!e $een encroache upon. +he population of the ne& e!elope to&n in 1(11 &as 18,'';. +his =.==H ecrease of population &as ue to islocation of population after the estruction of the pre!ious settlement. *n the year 1(1:, the 0unicipal Committee came in to e/istence. )t that time, the area of the to&n &as !ery small. "hysical gro&th continue an no& the area &as a$out ' s<uare miles 816 %m=>. +he ma#or gro&th of the to&n has ta%en place since 1('7. +he to&n has largely sprea to the north an southE it coul not e/pan to the &est ue to the anger of floo ing torrents such as affecte the to&n in 1(55. ?o&e!er, gro&th has also ta%en place in the eastern si e. )lmost all of the ne& e!elopments in north an east of the planne to&n are haphazar ly $uilt. +he e!elopment in the to&n from 1('7 to 1(58 remaine slo&, ue to lac% of transportation an communication facilities. Inly a $oat $ri ge on the ri!er *n us in &inter season an steamer ser!ice for summer season lin%e Dera Ghazi Khan &ith the rest of the "un#a$. +aunsa Barrage on ri!er *n us &as complete in 1(5: an the pace of e!elopment gaine momentum. During the last 5 years, 7= in ustrial units &ere esta$lishe . Ghazi +e/tile mills is another attempt to esta$lish a hea!y in ustrial comple/ in or er to raise the economic $ase of the to&n.
Languages
7arai%i is the main language spo%en in this region. Ither languages that are spo%en inclu e 3r u, Balochi, "un#a$i, "ashto, an 7in hi.
I.
PRO,ECT DESCRIPTION
;7 )$e Dera "$azi 1D"2 #$an ,ural Development !ro/ect 1t$e !ro/ect2 in !akistan is in t$e D" #$an and ,a/anpur districts of t$e central province of !un/ab: along its sout$ern fringe7 *t appraisal: rural poverty in t$e province &as $ig$est in t$e districts of D" #$an 1&it$ =FI of t$e rural poor in t$e province2 and Ba$a&alpur 14BI27 )$e !ro/ect &as designed particularly for t$e poorest rural populations in 1i2 t$e rain(fed plains: 1ii2 rain(fed $ills: and 1iii2 canal(irrigated areas of t$ese t&o districts7 * survey done during appraisal revealed a rural poverty incidence of about EAI in t$e rain(fed plains and $ills: and about D5I in t$e canal(irrigated areas7 =7 )$e !ro/ect &as intended to increase rural incomes and employment: and improve t$e ?uality of life of t$e population7 "iven t$e areaKs potentials: t$ese ob/ectives &ere to be ac$ieved by 1i2 improving irrigation and road infrastructure: 1ii2 developing communities: 1iii2 providing financial services: and 1iv2 providing institutional support t$roug$ organizational and skills training for beneficiaries in village communities7 )$e !ro/ect $ad t$e follo&ing components and scope of &orkH 1i2 %rrigation improvementH:1a2 re$abilitating temporary diversions and lining &orks in perennial $ill torrent net&orks: 1b2 developing ;55 &ater users associations 1W0*s2 and improving ;55 &atercourses 1WCs2 in $ill torrents: and 1c2 installing ;55 tube &ells and improving t$e related WCs in fres$&ater zones7 Community development 1CD2H 1a2 mobilizing and strengt$ening B55 community organizations 1COs2M and 1b2 identifying: prioritizing: and implementing CD subpro/ects 1to be done by t$e communities t$emselves27 ,ural roadsH upgrading of about ;DA km of rural roadsM 'inancial services 1' 2H 1a2 mobilizing village savings and credit organizations 1 COs2: 1b2 financing sub(loans: 1c2 mobilizing savings: and 1d2 providing training7 %mplementation supportH consultancy services and incremental administration support for t$e purpose of 1a2 mobilizing and strengt$ening beneficiary W0*s: COs: and COs in t$e villagesM and 1b2 designing and supervising t$e infrastructure construction and strengt$ening t$e pro/ect management unit 1!M027 II. A. EVAL%ATION O" DESIGN AND I)PLE)ENTATION
47 )$e ob/ective of increasing rural incomes and employment: and improving t$e ?uality of life especially for &omen: &as consistent &it$ t$e ne& operation strategy prepared by t$e *sian
Development Bank 1*DB2 for !akistan in ;<<A: &$ic$ &as centered on $uman development and: above all: on poverty reduction and on t$e improvement of t$e status of &omen7 %n agriculture and rural development: *DBKs strategy at appraisal &as focused on rural development pro/ects in more back&ard areas &it$ $ig$ poverty: &$ere better use of natural and $uman resources &ould lead to economic gro&t$7 )$e c$oice of t$e pro/ect area &as dictated by poverty incidence and t$e geograp$ic focus of *DBKs sector strategy7 )$e design &as consistent &it$ t$e strategic ob/ectives of t$e "overnment of !akistanNeconomic and social development: greater private sector participation: improved agricultural production: more efficient use of increasingly scarce irrigation &ater: rural development: reduced poverty: &ider coverage of basic infrastructure 1including rural roads2 for more accessible services: and environmental and social sustainability7
F7 *t completion: t$e !ro/ectKs design and ob/ectives &ere still relevant and consistent &it$ *DBKs country strategy;: emp$asizing sustainable pro(poor gro&t$ t$roug$ rural development and infrastructure development7 )$e C ! also stressed inclusive social development: particularly improvements in social service delivery systems7 *ccordingly: t$e !ro/ect &as designed to encourage communities to participate in subpro/ect implementation and operation7 A7 )$e "overnment is no& pursuing a &ell(designed: multi(pronged poverty reduction strategy to generate employment and build infrastructure in rural and lo&(income urban areas by increasing t$e access of t$e poor to basic services: microcredit: and social safety nets7 )$e !ro/ect design &as in line not only &it$ t$is strategy but also &it$ t$e "overnmentKs Medium()erm Development 'rame&ork =55A=5;5: &$ic$ is focused on t$e rural sector and specifically on en$ancing t$e asset o&ners$ip of t$e poor: strengt$ening t$e nonfarm sector: promoting t$e participation of t$e rural population in development: improving rural financial markets: and developing t$e $uman resources of rural development institutions7 B7 )$e components and activities of t$e !ro/ect: beneficiary selection: and stake$older participation and consultation: as designed at appraisal: &ere all sound7 * particular strengt$ of t$e design &as t$e emp$asis on building t$e capacity of COs and increasing t$e participation of beneficiaries in pro/ect planning: design: and implementation7 Decentralizing t$e management of operation and maintenance 1O&M2 and encouraging cost s$aring by communities dramatically c$anged t$e development model for t$e area7 )$e !ro/ect assisted in 1i2 surface and subsurface irrigation: 1ii2 WC lining: 1iii2 soil and &ater conservation: 1iv2 $ill torrent management: and 1v2 livestock and agriculture productivity improvement7 )$ese activities $elped develop and $arness t$e areaKs agriculture: livestock: and &ater potential7 )$e rural roads component gave farmers better access to markets and services7 )$e ' component broug$t t$em economic empo&erment t$roug$ muc$(needed cas$ at affordable interest rates at t$eir doorstep: &it$ &$ic$ t$ey could buy good(?uality inputs: sell t$eir produce at t$e rig$t time: and increase t$eir profit margins7 )$e implementation support component developed and strengt$ened COs and W0*s: and intensified net&orking: t$us creating social capital and contributing to improved services by t$e line agencies in t$e communities7 Capacity building and skills training of COs led to more /obs7 )$e provision of drinking &ater: sanitation: and village infrastructure improved t$e ?uality of life of t$e village communities7 "enerally: all t$e pro/ect activities &ere in line &it$ t$e needs of t$e area and served t$eir purpose effectively7 D7 )$e implementation arrangements at appraisal relied $eavily on t$e ability of t$e %mplementing *gencies 1%*s2 to implement t$e !ro/ect: &it$out dedicated support or decentralized aut$ority7 During implementation it &as realized t$at t$e %*sK capacity $ad been overrated and t$eir need for implementation support $ad been taken too lig$tly7 )$e devolution of most %*s to t$e district level: under t$e -ocal "overnment Ordinance 1-"O2 of =55;: magnified t$e %*sK lack of capacity7 imilarly: t$e costs and size of certain subpro/ect components $ad been miscalculated: and invalid assumptions $ad been made about t$e average size of t$e COs7 )o address t$ese issues and to meet t$e beneficiariesK targets as anticipated at appraisal: *DB made minor c$anges in t$e cost category allocations: implementation arrangements: and scope of t$e !ro/ect during implementation7 ,egistering t$e COs mobilized for t$e !ro/ect as community citizen boards under -"O =55; gave t$em access to more resources and ensured t$at t$e social capital of t$e !ro/ect &as mainstreamed7
E7 *t completion: t$e design of almost all !ro/ect components remained relevant and consistent &it$ current approac$es to rural development7 Co&ever: t$e success of t$e
;
4 implementation &as due primarily to t$e dedicated and relentless support of t$e E+ecuting *gency 1E*2 and its !M0: assisted by a nongovernment organization 1."O2: rat$er t$an t$e performance of t$e %*s 1line departments27 B. Pro&ect O!t'!ts
<7 )$e planned and ac$ieved outputs of t$e !ro/ect are summarized in a table in *ppendi+ ; and discussed belo&7 ;57 Irrigation Im'ro#ement. )$is component comprisedH 1i2 surface irrigation: and 1ii2 irrigation7 )$e ac$ievement of outputs under t$e surface irrigation subcomponent &as only partly satisfactory7 On t$e rain(fed plains: t$e !ro/ect &as to support small(scale irrigation improvements: to increase t$e efficiency of &ater use at t$e @e$ova and #a$a $ill torrents: by 1i2 re$abilitating t$e irrigated command area of about B:F;5 $ectares 1$a2: and 1ii2 developing about =:<;5 $a of unirrigated land7 )$e appraised activities &ereH 1i2 minor improvements in temporary diversion $ead&orks and structures at @e$ova: and t$e strengt$ening of eart$&orks in t$e #a$a main c$annelM 1ii2 t$e partial lining of t$e main supply c$annelM and 1iii2 t$e formation of about ;55 W0*s: and t$e improvement of about ;55 WCs t$roug$ t$e lining of one t$ird 1455 km2 of t$eir collective lengt$7 )$e improvement of t$e cross(drainage: diversions: and eart$&orks of t$e #a$a $ill torrent broug$t an additional F:EAF $a of unirrigated land under t$e #a$a command7 But only ;5 WCs 145 km in total lengt$2 &ere lined: improving &ater flo&s to about F55 $a of land7 Emerging &ater rig$ts issues in @e$ova: lo& demand for WCs: and lining &orks already carried out by t$e !un/ab government on canals in #a$a before t$e !ro/ect led to a reduction in t$e scope of activities7 )$e %* could not provide reasonable alternatives to @e$ova: despite repeated consultations and re?uests by *DB7 !ro/ect efforts at WC development &ere stopped in December =55F at t$e re?uest of t$e !un/ab government to facilitate implementation t$roug$ a national program: &$ic$ follo&ed a slig$tly different approac$7 'unds &ere allocated by t$e !un/ab government for t$is program: and &ork on all t$e remaining A5 WCs in #a$a $as been completed7 ;;7 )$e ac$ievement of outputs under t$e irrigation subcomponent &as satisfactory7 )$e support for irrigation in t&o ma/or fres$&ater zones on t$e rain(fed plains &as designed to involve 1i2 forming about ;55 W0*s: 1ii2 installing ;55 tube &ells 1D)Ws2: 1iii2 improving about ;55 WCs: and 1iv2 monitoring t$e rec$arge7 )$e ac$ievements e+ceeded t$e original targets in several respectsH ;4B W0*s &ere formed: and t$ey completed &ork on ;4B D)Ws and F5 WCs7 Work on t$e remaining WCs $as been completed &it$ government funding: as e+plained in para7 ;57 !iezometers &ere installed in t$e tube &ells to allo& t$e monitoring of t$e ground&ater level during implementation7 .o reduction in t$e &ater table &as noted: and t$e Department of %rrigation and !o&er 1D%!2: t$e %* for t$is component: continues to monitor t$e &ater table7 )$e irrigation component cost >47D million: compared &it$ >A million estimated at appraisal7 ;=7 Comm!nit$ De#elo'ment. !rogress in ac$ieving t$e outputs of t$e CD component &as $ig$ly satisfactory7 )$e !ro/ect &as designed to respond to priority CD &orks identified and prioritized during t$e implementation by t$e communities t$emselves: &it$ t$e $elp of a facilitating nongovernment organization 1."O27 )$e activities in t$is component &ere grouped under five $eadingsH 1i2 $ill torrent management: 1ii2 soil and &ater conservation: 1iii2 agricultural production: 1iv2 livestock production: and 1v2 village and community infrastructure improvement7 )$e activities: as designed: included mobilizing and developing t$e capacity of B55 COs averaging =A members eac$ 1for a total of ;A:555 members2M F5I of t$ese organizations &ere to be &omenKs or mi+ed COs7 *t completion: more t$an ;:;;5 COs &it$ an average
members$ip of ;F members eac$ 1for a total of ;A:AB5 members2 $ad been mobilized: and =AI &ere all(&omen COs7 %n total: ;:4<E CD subpro/ects &ere completed at an average cost of >B:;BD: as against >=5:555 envisaged at appraisal7 *s appraised: t$e CD subpro/ects and plans &ere prioritized and implemented by t$e communities concerned and facilitated by t$e ."O7 *ppendi+ = lists t$e activities in t$is component7 *bout one t$ird &ere categorized as productive investments and anot$er t$ird as social sector investments 1provision of drinking &ater: sanitation: community $alls: etc727 )$e cost of t$is component &as >;47D million: as against >;D7= million estimated at appraisal7 ;47 R!ral Road %'grading. !rogress in ac$ieving t$e outputs of t$e rural road component &as $ig$ly satisfactory7 )$e !ro/ect &as designed to upgrade about ;DA km of rural roads7 *t completion: 4E< km of road $ad been upgraded 1*ppendi+ 427 )$e increase in scope &as approved by *DB at t$e re?uest of t$e !un/ab government $alf&ay t$roug$ t$e !ro/ect: given t$e lo& road(to(population and road(to(area ratios in t$e target area: and t$e need to cover t$e appraised target population of ;74 million7 )$e construction specifications for t$e roads &ere upgraded under t$e !ro/ect to meet t$e $ig$er specifications re?uired for durability and minimum maintenance: as envisaged at appraisal7 )$is subcomponent cost >=47F million: compared &it$ >;F74 million estimated at appraisal7 )$e increase in cost &as due mainly to t$e increase in t$e scope of t$e component7 )$e cost per kilometer of road &as significantly lo&er 1by =EI2 t$an t$e appraisal estimate7 ;F7 "inancial Ser#ices. !rogress in ac$ieving t$e ' component outputs &as $ig$ly satisfactory7 )$e !ro/ect envisaged support for t$e .ational ,ural upport !rogram 1., !2N an ."O t$at &as concerned mainly &it$ t$e social mobilization of t$e poor: including &omenN and t$e provision of ' t$roug$ ;:555 village COs 1$alf of &$ic$ &ere &omenKs COs2 &it$ a total members$ip of =A:5557 )$e ., ! &ould be e+tended a credit line of >=7BD million: and more t$an 4B:555 recycled sub(loans &ould be financed over a A(year implementation period7 )$e sub(loans &ere e+pected to average >;A5 eac$ and to $ave a recovery rate of over <5I7 )otal outstanding savings &ould amount to >455:555 by t$e end of t$e !ro/ect7 )$is component also included management training for about =:555 CO leaders 1t&o per CO2 and skills training for about F:555 ot$er members7 *t completion: t$e ., ! $ad 1i2 mobilized more t$an ;:F<F COs 14FI of &$ic$ &ere &omenKs COs2 &it$ a total members$ip of about =A:555: and 1ii2 provided ;;5:555 sub(loans using a credit line of >=7BA million over a D(year implementation period7 )$e loans averaged >=4A eac$ and $ad a recovery rate of <<IM total outstanding savings amounted to >;75F million7 )$e ."O provided management training to more t$an =:E55 CO members and skills training to anot$er ;=:A55 members 1*ppendi+ F27 )$is subcomponent cost >=7E million: compared &it$ >47; million estimated at appraisal7 ;A7 Instit!tional S!''ort. )$e !ro/ect &as designed to provide institutional support to t$e beneficiary W0*s: COs: and COs in t$e villages to enable t$em to prepare investment programs t$roug$ participatory approac$es: implement t$e !ro/ect: establis$ a monitoring and evaluation system: and update and maintain databases relevant to t$e system7 )$e !M0 envisaged $iring ."Os for about E55 person(mont$s to set up and strengt$en t$e COs: W0*s: and COs7 Consultants to be $ired in t$ree packages for a total of about B5 person(mont$s &ould also assist t$e !M0 and t$e relevant %* in designing roads and supervising construction: establis$ing a benefit monitoring and evaluation 1BME2 system for t$e !M0: and preparing simple legal contracts bet&een t$e %*s and beneficiary organizations7 * total of ;:F;5 person(mont$s of ."O services &ent into t$e formation and strengt$ening of ;:;;5 COs: =55 W0*s: and ;F<F COsM DE person(mont$s of consulting services: into t$e design of roads and construction supervisionM and A< person(mont$s: into t$e establis$ment of baseline data and t$e conduct of BME studies7 * simple legal contract bet&een t$e %*s and beneficiaries &as
developed by t$e !M0 &it$out t$e $elp of consultants7 )$e cost of t$is component &as >F7B million: as estimated at appraisal7 !erson(mont$s $ad to be added because t$e scope of t$e services $ad been underestimated during appraisal and t$e CD and rural roads components $ad increased in scope7 Co&ever: t$e overall cost of t$e subcomponent did not increase7 ;B7 )$e above c$anges in t$e cost and t$e scope of individual components $elped ac$ieve t$e !ro/ectKs ob/ectives and cover t$e ;74 million beneficiaries envisaged at appraisal7 )$ese c$anges $ad only a minor impact on t$e implementation sc$edule since effective measures &ere takenN t$e number of !M0 staff and logistical resources &ere increasedNto avoid delays in implementation7 C. Pro&ect Costs
;D7 )$e actual pro/ect cost &as >FE7F million: compared &it$ >A=7= million estimated at appraisal7 1)$e appraised and actual pro/ect costs are in *ppendi+ A72 )$e CD and irrigation components cost less t$an planned7 )$e saving of >47A million in t$e cost of t$e CD component &as a result of overestimation of t$e size and cost of t$e CD subpro/ects at appraisal: and insufficient community capacity to afford larger subpro/ects7 )$e saving of >;7F million in t$e cost of t$e irrigation improvement component &as due mainly to a reduction in t$e scope of t$e surface irrigation subcomponent compelled by &ater rig$ts issues: a partial overlap &it$ ot$er programs: and lack of demand for WCs7 )$e rural roads component: $o&ever: cost more t$an anticipated at appraisal7 )$e increase of >E7B million in t$e cost of t$is component &as due mainly to an increase in scope 1from ;DA km to 4E< km of road upgraded2 to benefit t$e !ro/ectKs target population of ;74 million7 Co&ever: t$e cost per kilometer of road &as significantly lo&er 1by =EI2 t$an estimated during appraisal7 )$e institutional support and ' components: on t$e ot$er $and: &ere completed &it$out any significant variation in costs7 )$us: in most cases 1e+cept for t$e irrigation component2: t$ere &as an increase in scope and yet t$e !ro/ect &as completed for less t$an t$e appraised cost7 )$e c$anges in cost $ad a positive overall impact on t$e !ro/ectKs economic and financial rates of return7 D. Disb!rsements
;E7 .o disbursement sc$edule &as developed during appraisal7 Disbursement &as initially slo& but picked up in =55= and peaked in t$e last = years 1=55A=55B2 of t$e !ro/ect7 )$e initial slo& disbursement &as due to a delayed start: &it$out a full(time pro/ect director: and t&o separate investigations into allegations of mismanagement and financial malpractice7 )$e overall impact of t$is delay &as more t$an 4 years7 ubse?uently: minor delays &ere caused by t$e revision of t$e !ro/ect documents: 1!C(%2 = : fla&s in pro/ect design assumptions: and contractorsK unresponsiveness to t$e rural roads contracts in =5547 Delays &ere also caused by -"O =55;: in vie& of t$e lack of implementation capacity in t$e districts and: in some cases: t$e lack of interest on t$e part of t$e %*s in providing t$e envisaged design and implementation support for subpro/ects7 Minor c$anges made by *DB in t$e scope of t$e !ro/ect and its implementation arrangements in eptember =55=: allo&ing t$e rural roads component to be divided into smaller procurement packages: improved implementation and disbursement7 )$e actual disbursements and contract a&ards under t$e !ro/ect are listed in *ppendi+ B7
E.
Pro&ect Sc-ed!le
;<7 )$e implementation of activities according to t$e !ro/ectKs planned sc$edule &as only partly satisfactory7 1)$e appraised and actual implementation sc$edules are in *ppendi+ D72 *lt$oug$ t$e targets identified in t$e appraised sc$edule &ere realistic and practical: t$ey &ere based on t$e 1incorrect2 assumption t$at t$e %*s could meet t$ese targets on sc$edule 1para7 E27 )$e capacity of t$e %*s &as furt$er &eakened after t$e introduction of t$e devolution plan in =55;: &$ic$ transferred more responsibilities to %*s: in some cases &it$out giving t$em t$e additional staff and resources re?uired7 Moreover: t$e pro/ect sc$edule: &$ic$ $ad already been delayed by ;< mont$s by management issues 1para7 ;E2: &as delayed furt$er by $aving to reestablis$ t$e !ro/ectKs credibility in =55=7 )$e situation started improving in =55= and t$e !ro/ect s$o&ed ma/or progress in =554: after c$anges in t$e !ro/ectKs implementation arrangements7 )$e !ro/ect &as completed in .ovember =55B: &it$in t$e revised implementation sc$edule: &it$ an unavoidable delay of =4 mont$s carried for&ard from =555 =55;7 ". Im'lementation Arrangements
=57 )$e !un/ab governmentKs !lanning and Development Department &as t$e !ro/ectKs E*: providing overall supervision and coordination t$roug$ a !M0 establis$ed in D" #$an7 )$e pro/ect design included several %*s: in accordance &it$ t$e capacity re?uired for t$e various subcomponents7 )$e %*s &ere 1i2 t$e Directorate of On('arm Water Management 1DO'WM2: for t$e irrigation improvement component and t$e management of smaller $ill torrents under t$e CD componentM 1ii2 t$e D%!: for c$annel improvements under t$e irrigation improvement component and t$e management of larger $ill torrents under t$e CD componentM 1iii2 t$e Department of *griculture: for t$e soil and &ater conservation and agricultural production activities under t$e CD componentM 1iv2 t$e Department of -ivestock: for t$e livestock production activities under t$e CD componentM 1v2 t$e -ocal "overnment and ,ural Development Department: for village and community infrastructure improvement activities under t$e CD componentM 1vi2 t$e Communication and Works Department:1C&WD2 for t$e rural roads componentM 1vii2 ., !: for t$e ' componentM and 1viii2 t$e !M0: for t$e institutional support component7 )$e implementation arrangements at appraisal &ere based on prior e+perience in several *DB( financed area and rural development pro/ects &$ere $aving a relatively large number of %*s $ad proved &orkable and efficient as long as t$e components &ere designed in a straig$tfor&ard manner and could be implemented independently7 Co&ever: in t$e !ro/ect: &$ere t$e capacity of district %*s varied from district to district: t$is approac$ did not deliver &ell7 %n remote districts &it$ scarce $uman resources: %*s &ere $ard put to retain $ig$(?uality staff &it$out special incentives or administrative control over t$e staff by t$e district government7 )$e !ro/ect design did not foresee t$e need for dedicated implementation staff for t$e %*s: e+cept t$e DO'WM: and t$e consulting services &ere of insufficient volume to meet capacity gaps in t$e %*s7 )$is issue &as resolved during implementation by increasing t$e !M0Ks tec$nical staff &it$ t$e $elp of an incremental staff budget: to provide support to t$e %*s in design and tec$nical supervision &$erever gaps e+isted7 Co&ever: suc$ support also limited t$e %*sK involvement: and $ence defeated t$e ob/ective of building pro/ect o&ners$ip and capacity in t$e %*s7 G. Conditions and Co#enants
=;7 )$e conditions of loan effectiveness &ere met and t$e loan &as declared effective &it$in EE days of its signing7 *ll t$e covenants &ere relevant and t$e !ro/ectKs compliance &it$ key
D social: financial: environmental: economic: and ot$er implementation loan covenants &as deemed satisfactory 1*ppendi+ E27 Of t$e F< loan covenants: FB &ere met: ; &as partly met: ; is still to be met: and ; is not yet due 1recommended follo&(up actions are in para7 A<27 )$e loan covenant still to be met relates to t$e O&M of t$e roads completed under t$e !ro/ectM t$e %* $as allocated enoug$ funds in its annual O&M budget for t$is purpose7 )$e covenant t$at &as only partly met relates to t$e establis$ment and operations of t$e pro/ect coordination committee 1!CC2 at t$e divisional level: to revie& plans: address coordination issues: and resolve obstacles to implementation7 )$e !CC &as formed and met t&ice7 *fter -"O =55; &as passed: t$e divisional tier of government &as abolis$ed and coordination and planning devolved to t$e districts7 Wit$ t$e delay in t$e implementation of reforms under -"O =55; and in t$e transfer of ade?uate numbers of staff to t$e districts: t$e pro/ect steering committee 1! C2: &it$ all t$e line departments: stake$olders: and district management represented: took over t$e role of t$e !CC7 )$e ! C met regularly and performed t$is role efficiently7 )$e !M0: for its part: reported on t$e progress and ac$ievements of t$e !ro/ect to stake$olders every ;A days: to facilitate coordination7 )$e !M0 also submitted ?uarterly progress reports: audited financial statements: and t$e pro/ect completion report &ell &it$in t$e time covenanted in t$e -oan *greement: and t$e ?uality of t$ese reports &as generally acceptable to *DB7 .. Cons!ltant Recr!itment and Proc!rement
==7 Consultants &ere selected and goods and &orks &ere procured according to t$e -oan *greement 1sc$edules F and A2 and *DBKs guidelines for t$e $iring of consultants and for procurement7 %n t$e first = years t$e E* $ad problems applying t$e *DB procedures and guidelinesM $o&ever: after t$e first fe& contracts and &it$ regular guidance from *DB: t$e $iring of consultants and t$e procurement of goods and &orks &ere undertaken efficiently for t$e rest of t$e pro/ect period7 )$e consultants and t$e ."O &ere $ired in four packages7 )$e first package for B person(mont$s of design services &as a&arded to an individual consultant since fe& firms $ad e+pressed interest: given t$e small size of t$e assignment and t$e remote location of t$e pro/ect area7 )$e contract for A< person(mont$s to establis$ a BME system &as a&arded to t$e !un/ab Economic ,esearc$ %nstitute 1!E,%2: t$roug$ single(source selection 1 2 procedures approved by *DB at inception4Nagain because of t$e lack of interest from private sector firms in providing t$is service in a remote area7 'or t$e t$ird contract: a consulting firm &as $ired t$roug$ ?uality( and cost(based selection to provide D= person(mont$s of construction supervision services for t$e rural roads component7 )$e ."OKs services for community mobilization and strengt$ening and t$e ' component &ere engaged t$roug$ procedures approved at appraisal7 * contract for legal services &as also a&arded but later canceled as t$e standard contracts used for communities in similar pro/ects &ere deemed sufficient reference models for t$e !ro/ect and t$ere &as no longer a need to outsource legal services7 @ariations &ere made in t$e ."O and construction supervision services contracts to accommodate t$e increase in scope and t$e delay in implementation7 Co&ever: t$ese c$anges did not $ave any cost implicationsH all t$e consulting services contracts &ere completed at a cost of >57BB million: compared &it$ >57E< million envisaged at appraisal: and t$e ."OKs contract &as completed at a cost of >=7;= million: as against >;7<B million envisaged at appraisal7 =47 )$e civil &orks contracts for rural roads &ere packaged into seven large road contracts at appraisalM anot$er 4A km of road &ould be identified and tendered during implementation7
4
Co&ever: &it$ t$e delayed start of t$e !ro/ect: most of t$e roads identified at appraisal 1e+cept for t&o packages2 &ere taken up by t$e !un/ab government for implementation7 0nder t$e c$anged scope approved by *DB: t$e !M0 used t$e selection criteria approved at appraisal to identify a total lengt$ of 4B5 km of remaining and additional ne& roads7 )$e roads &ere initially packaged into large contracts 1around >; million eac$27 But in t$e surge of construction activities of national and provincial road aut$orities in t$e pro/ect area: fe& large contractors &ere available and fe&er still responded to t$e advertisements for bids7 )$e t&o larger contracts t$at &ere initially a&arded &ere delayed by negligence and lack of interest from ma/or contractors7 %n consultation &it$ *DB: t$e Borro&er divided t$e roads into smaller packages7 * total of <B small contracts &ere a&arded: and most &ere completed &it$in t$e contract period7 I. Per ormance o Cons!ltants/ Contractors/ and S!''liers
=F7 )$e performance of t$e design and construction supervision consultants &as satisfactory7 )$e consultants made staff available on(site and maintained t$eir staff presence even under difficult conditions in remote areas7 )$ey could do so because t$ey mobilized and trained local staff7 )$e overall cost estimate for t$e services &as >57;A million: but >57FE million &as re?uired to complete t$e &ork7 )$e increase in cost &as due mainly to t$e underestimation of costs at appraisal and an increase in pro/ect targets for t$e upgrading of rural roads7 =A7 !E,%Ks BME performance &as satisfactory7 )$ere &ere initial delays in collecting baseline data and producing interim reports on t$e impact assessment7 Co&ever: after !E,% made some c$anges in staff assignments: t$ese issues &ere resolved and !E,% &as able to increase t$e size of t$e baseline sample according to t$e revised scope7 !E,% delivered an impact and completion report according to t$e revised sc$edule agreed on &it$ *DB7 )$is &ork &as estimated at >57D; millionM it &as completed for >57;4 million7 =B7 *bout ;55 contracts &ere a&arded7 )$e overall performance of contractors &as generally satisfactory7 mall contractors tended to perform better t$an large contractors7 -ooking for a ?uick turnover and facing internal fund constraints: t$e small contractors &ere ?uick to mobilize and completed &orks on time7 *lmost all of t$e large contracts 1above >57A million2 &ere muc$ delayed and produced a lo&er ?uality of construction t$an t$e small contracts7 )$e a&arding of t$e larger contracts itself delayed pro/ect implementation: and t$en after t$e contracts &ere a&arded t$e large contractors &ere a ma/or cause of delay in implementing &orks7 mall local contractors also performed better because t$ey understood t$e local culture and traditions better and built rapport &it$ local communities7 *ll additional land needed for &idening roads and improving t$eir alignment &as provided voluntarily by stake$older communities7 ,oad contractors ?uoted $ig$ly competitive rates and rebuilt or improved 4E< km of roads at an average cost of >A<:555 per km against an appraisal estimate of >E=:555 per km: for a substantial saving in t$e cost of construction7 .o ma/or supply contracts &ere a&arded7 ,. Per ormance o t-e Borro0er and t-e E1ec!ting Agenc$
=D7 )$e performance of t$e !ro/ectKs E*: t$e !lanning and Development Department: &as $ig$ly satisfactory7 *fter an initial delay due to a tussle bet&een !M0 staff and t$e district administration: t$e E* &as able to manage and supervise t$e !ro/ect very effectively7 *ll policy decisions: compliance revie&s: subpro/ect processing: and approvals &ere made diligently and efficiently7 )$e E*Ks !M0 fulfilled its management and coordination targets: including t$e
< procurement and management of contracts: implementation: and monitoring and evaluation of t$e !ro/ectKs institutional support component7 )$e performance of t$e %*s: on t$e ot$er $and: &as only partly satisfactory7 ome %*sNDO'WM 1for irrigation2: D%! 1for WC development2: t$e Department of -ivestock 1for livestock production2: and t$e -ocal "overnment and ,ural Development Department 1for community development2Nlacked capacity and interest in t$e !ro/ect7 )$e !M0 $ad to mobilize its resources on most fronts for &orks t$at s$ould been implemented by t$ese %*s7 1%mplementation arrangements &ere c$anged during t$e !ro/ectKs midterm revie& to strengt$en t$e !M0Ks ability to take on t$e role of nonperforming %*s72 Co&ever: t$e ."O 1., !2 performed very &ell: effectively assisting t$e !M0 and %*s in organizing and strengt$ening COs and facilitating t$e participation of COs and W0*s in t$e implementation of t$e !ro/ect7 )$e ., ! proved fle+ible and provided stopgap support to many %*s &it$ inade?uate capacity7 Wit$ its o&n resources: t$e ., ! &as also able to continue t$e ' component during t$e period &$en !ro/ect activities &ere suspended 1=555=55;27 -ike&ise: t$e performance of t$e C&WD: t$e %* for t$e rural roads component: &as satisfactory7 )$e C&WD managed to complete 4E< km of road in t$e pro/ect area against t$e original target of ;DA km &it$in t$e e+tension period of =4 mont$s: &it$ very little e+ternal support7 2. Per ormance o t-e Asian De#elo'ment Ban(
=E7 *DBKs performance in administering t$e !ro/ect &as satisfactory7 .o delays in t$e implementation can be attributed to *DB7 Missions &ere conducted regularly: and most revisions: c$anges: and e+tensions &ere forestalled and approval &as given &ell a$ead of time7 !M0 management &as suspended by t$e "overnment after ma/or disputes bet&een !M0 staff and allegations of corruption at t$e start of t$e implementation7 *ll pro/ect activities stopped7 )$e delegation of t$e !ro/ect to t$e !akistan ,esident Mission in =555 increased close and regular consultations bet&een t$e Borro&er and *DB7 !M0 staff acceptable to *DB &ere appointed in October =55; and activities resumed7 )$e Midterm ,evie& Mission in =55F identified gaps in t$e implementation arrangements related to t$e limited implementation capacity of t$e %*s and t$e need for a c$ange in scope to cover t$e t$inly spread population to be served by t$e !ro/ect7 )$ese issues &ere resolved during t$e mission t$roug$ a c$ange in scope and in implementation arrangements7 )$e only ot$er minor delays related to disbursement during t$e t&o e+tensions of t$e pro/ect 1loan2 closing dates: &$en funds could not be transferred to t$e imprest account7 *DB acted promptly on bot$ occasions to allo& limited replenis$ments since bot$ t$e COs managing contracts and many small private contractors 1more t$an E5 &it$ contracts of less t$an >57; million eac$2 could not sustain any delays in payment by *DB7 .o disagreement &it$ t$e Borro&er on t$e terms of reference: bidding: or a&ards affected pro/ect implementation7 =<7 )$e !akistan ,esident Mission interacted regularly &it$ t$e %*7 !ro/ect staff &ere trained in pro/ect management and administration: including procurement: disbursement: and consultant $iring procedures7 )$e E* and %*s received advice and guidance daily and during *DB missionsNa practice t$at &as ackno&ledged and appreciated by t$e Borro&er7 III. A. Rele#ance EVAL%ATION O" PER"OR)ANCE
457 )$e !ro/ect remained relevant to and consistent &it$ *DBKs C ! and &it$ t$e "overnmentKs long(term plans and strategies for rural development and t$e agriculture sector:
;5
bot$ at appraisal and at completion7 %ts overall impact s$o&s t$at most of its appraised design aspects &ere relevant to and $elped increase farm productivity: created employment: increased &ater use efficiency: and increased t$e incomes of small farmers 1*ppendi+ <27 4;7 W$ile t$e design of t$e !ro/ect &as relevant: $o&ever: t$e notional targets for community sc$emes and road construction $ad been underestimated7 )$e CO targets assumed an average CO members$ip of =A per CD sc$eme7 * members$ip of only ;F &as observed at midtermNnot enoug$ to meet t$e !ro/ectKs target of benefiting ;A:555 $ouse$olds7 imilarly: t$e targets assumed at appraisal for improving rural roads &ere too lo& to serve t$e ;74 million intended beneficiaries: given t$e pro/ect areaKs scattered settlements7 *t midterm: *DB increased t$e number of CD sc$emes and t$e targets for CO formation and rural roads to respond to t$e t$in population spread: &$ile still keeping &it$in t$e overall cost of t$e !ro/ect and &it$out compromising ?uality standards7 )$ese c$anges during implementation improved t$e !ro/ectKs relevance and its capacity to reac$ t$e targeted population7 B. E ecti#eness in Ac-ie#ing O!tcome
4=7 )$e !ro/ect &as effective in ac$ieving its outcomes7 *t completion: t$e total value of production 1net of production cost2 from t$e additional $ectares broug$t under cultivation in #a$a &as estimated at >;E4:=55: for an increase of >4D7D per $a in t$e yearly gross margin 1*ppendi+ <: )able *<7B27 )$e lo& gross margin &as due mainly to seasonal variations in flo& in t$e #a$a $ill torrent and t$e related lo& cropping intensity in t$e area7 )$e total annual value of production 1net of production cost2 from t$e ;4D D)Ws of about >A7; million meant a yearly gross margin of ><4= per $a in t$e irrigated plains: compared &it$ t$e >455 per $a envisaged at appraisal7 )$is significant increase in t$e estimated gross margin &as due to t$e follo&ingH 1i2 t$e $ig$er(t$an(e+pected cropping intensities ac$ieved by farmersM 1ii2 t$e cultivation of $ig$( value crops suc$ as onionsM 1iii2 t$e availability of loans t$roug$ t$e lines of credit supported by t$e !ro/ectM and 1iv2 t$e "overnmentKs deregulation policy: &$ic$ gave farmers $ig$er compatible values for t$eir outputs: and t$us an incentive to gro& $ig$(value crops7 447 During t$e !ro/ect Completion ,evie& 1!C,2 Mission: road users indicated t$at passenger fares $ad gone do&n by almost A5I: as envisaged at appraisal7 )$e average passenger fare is e?ual to t$at c$arged to transport a F5 kilogram 1kg2 load7 )$e !C, Mission estimated t$at: on t$e average: eac$ $ouse$old no& saves >=5 in passenger fares and >F5 in cartage yearly 1*ppendi+ <: para7 ;A2: for a total of >B5Nalmost t$ree times t$e appraised estimate7 )$e increase in savings is attributed to various factorsH 1i2 t$e transfer of a larger s$are of t$e ve$icle operating cost to consumers: 1ii2 competition in t$e transport sector made possible by liberal bank leasing facilities: 1iii2 a surge in economic activity from greater(t$an(e+pected development: and 1iv2 &idespread demand for CD infrastructure7 4F7 )$e average increase in $ouse$old income for all CD sc$emes &as >=; per $ouse$old: &it$ t$e $ig$est increase reported from soil conservation structures: &$ic$ contributed an annual increase of >4=D per $ouse$old: against >=A estimated at appraisal for soil conservation measures alone7 4A7 %n addition: t$e !ro/ectKs investment in nonfarm community sc$emes and social services suc$ as drinking &ater: street paving: sanitation: and community facilities $as $elped improve living standards7 )$e provision of doorstep credit facilities $as made it economically possible for farmers to gro& $ig$(value crops: buy better(?uality inputs: and sell outputs on t$eir o&n terms7
;;
C.
4B7 )$e !ro/ect proved efficient in ac$ieving its planned outcomes and outputs7 %t &as completed at <4I of t$e estimated cost and &as able to ac$ieve more t$an t$e appraised targets for all components 1e+cept t$e surface irrigation subcomponent27 )$e delay of more t$an =4 mont$s in implementation did not reduce t$e overall economic internal rate of return 1E%,,2: &$ic$ &as estimated at 447AI: compared &it$ =47BI estimated at appraisal 1*ppendi+ <27 )$e met$odology adopted during appraisal &as also used in evaluating t$e pro/ect interventions at completion7 *t appraisal: E%,,s &ere estimated for t$e irrigation improvement and rural roads components but not for t$e community development: ' : and institutional support components7 )$e E%,, for t$e surface irrigation subcomponent &as evaluated at =475I against an appraisal estimate of F47=I: despite t$e reduction in scope and t$e decision not to re$abilitate t$e $ead reac$: &$ere t$e additional area allocated for $ig$(value crops 1t$e main contributor to t$e $ig$ E%,, at appraisal2 &as located7 )$e E%,, for t$e installation of D)Ws &as estimated at 4<75I at t$e design stage: and AD7EI at t$e end of t$e !ro/ect: &$en $ig$er yields &ere assumed7 )$e E%,, for t$e rural roads component &as evaluated at 4B7<IN4 percentage points $ig$er t$an estimated at appraisal7 )$e estimated combined E%,, for t$e above components: toget$er &it$ t$e cost of institutional strengt$ening: &as estimated at =47BI at appraisal: and a significantly $ig$er 447AI at completion7 )$is suggests t$at t$e e+penditure on institutional strengt$ening &as cost(effective7 4D7 *t t$e appraisal stage: no financial analysis: indicative or ot$er&ise: &as done for t$e interventions t$at &ere to be identified and managed by communities: suc$ as income(generating p$ysical infrastructure 1cattle and poultry s$eds: &are$ouses: small irrigation sc$emes: small &$eat(flour mills and sa&mills: and soil conservation structures27 )$ese &ere to be funded after t$eir viability &as assessed: during implementation7 F imilarly: t$e !ro/ect also supported t$e development of community(managed social infrastructure suc$ as community $alls: dispensaries: nonformal sc$ool buildings: small drinking &ater supply structures and ponds: link roads and street soling: and culverts and bridges7 Most of t$ese interventions $ave proved beneficial7 Co&ever: some interventions for &$ic$ t$ere &as inconspicuous demand mig$t take a longer time t$an anticipated to yield t$e desired returns7 Cattle s$eds: for instance: &ill re?uire support services: including a net&ork for milk collection and financial support for building $erds: before t$ey are fully used7 imilarly: &are$ouses are currently underused because of t$e lack of marketable surpluses of grain: and of $olding capacity for cas$ crops7 Moreover: community organizations need to be strengt$ened furt$er to manage collective inputs and market outputs7 D. Preliminar$ Assessment o S!stainabilit$
4E7 )$e !ro/ectKs operations are likely to be sustainable7 )$e !un/ab government $as s$o&n strong o&ners$ip of t$e !ro/ectKs interventions and $as e+tended t$e !ro/ectKs activities after completion: using its o&n funding and retaining all pro/ect staff and ."Os involved7 4<7 *bout ;:4<E CD sc$emes &ere implemented by communities in t$e pro/ect area7 )$ese sc$emes &ere based on t$e priority needs of COs: &$ic$ also contributed to&ard t$e cost of
F
.ational ,ural upport !rogram 1., !27 =55A7 Rura& "e'e&opment Pro(ect7 %slamabad: ., !
;=
construction: s$o&ing t$eir o&ners$ip7 *ccording to t$e completion report from !E,%A and t$e observations of t$e !C, Mission: more t$an <AI of t$ese sc$emes: including t$ose t$at &ere completed more t$an A years ago: are fully operational7 )$e COs &ere registered under -"O =55; to ensure continuous utilization at capacity7 F57 )$ere are minor risks to t$e sustainability of t$e road infrastructure supported by t$e !ro/ect7 )$e !un/ab government $as developed a formula under &$ic$ all roads built under t$e !ro/ect receive an annual allocation of !,s44:555 per km for O&M 1rat$er t$an t$e !,s=5:555 provided in para7 4A: sc$edule B: of t$e -oan *greement2 to sustain t$e operation and economic benefits of t$ese roads7 )$e !C, Mission observed t$at: alt$oug$ t$e roads $ad been built to $ig$er specifications and &ould re?uire less maintenance: t$e districts $ad limited capacity to use O&M funds efficiently7 )o ensure t$e sustained O&M of t$e roads: regular follo&(up by t$e district roads departments and reporting to *DB every B mont$s &as recommended7 F;7 )$e ' component is $ig$ly likely to be sustainable since t$e !un/ab government $as agreed to e+tend t$e services of t$e ."O for t$e ne+t A years: after pro/ect completion7 )$e rural finance market $as also developed in t$e area and all mainstream microfinance institutions $ave opened branc$es to capitalize on economic opportunities7 F=7 )$e agriculture and irrigation infrastructure components are likely to be sustainable as &ell7 )$e ."O $as secured funding and &ill continue to assist farmers in net&orking and market connectivity in t$e medium term7 E+tension services in t$e pro/ect area: &$ic$ started in =55B: &ill continue under *DBKs econd *griculture ector !rogram -oan 1* !-(%%2 B t$roug$ a provincial trust fund for t$e ."O and an outreac$ program for agriculture e+tension and researc$ funded by * !-(%%7 D %n addition: policy reforms under * !-(%% are promoting greater private sector participation by introducing market(based mec$anisms: and are also e+pected to encourage farmers to increase production and use farm and irrigation infrastructure effectively7 )$e D%! $as: moreover: instituted a system of allocations for O&M of irrigation systems in !un/ab: including t$e #a$a perennial $ill torrent system: t$us ensuring funding support for t$e sustained maintenance of t$e system7 E. Im'act
F47 *s envisaged: t$e !ro/ect significantly reduced poverty in t$e pro/ect area7 )$e impact evaluation studies carried out by !E,%E s$o& t$at t$e pro/ect interventions $ave successfully reduced poverty incidence by ;BI: against t$e ;5I target at appraisal7 )$e !C, Mission estimated a ><A increase in t$e annual income of t$e average $ouse$old &it$ support from t$e !ro/ect: compared &it$ >;55 estimated at appraisal 1*ppendi+ <: )able *<7;527 FF7 *ccording to t$e !C, Mission: t$e improvements in enterprises and in farm and nonfarm activities $ave increased t$e demand for bot$ permanent and seasonal labor7 *griculture and related activities alone employ about =:;;= more eac$ year: compared &it$ ;:555 anticipated at appraisal7 )$e additional employment created during construction is estimated at F:D55 person(years 1*ppendi+ <: para7 =527 *nnual employment due to t$e pro/ect activities is
A B D E
!un/ab Economic ,esearc$ %nstitute 1!E,%27 =55B7 *conomic +na&y!i! of ,ariou! Component! of the "era #ha$i %han Rura& "e'e&opment Pro(ect) Part -7 !akistan: -a$ore7 -oan .o7 ;EDDL;EDE(!*#O 'H *griculture ector !rogram -oan %% 1* !-%%2: amounting to >4A5 million e?uivalent7 * condition for t$e release of t$e second tranc$e under * !-(%%7 !E,%7 =55B7 *conomic +na&y!i! of ,ariou! Component! under the "era #ha$i %han Rura& "e'e&opment Pro(ect) Part 27 !akistan: -a$ore7
;4 e+pected to surpass t$e =:555(person mark in coming years7 )$e !C, Mission also noted t$at t$e multiplier effect of interventions &ould generate ot$er rural nonfarm activities: furt$er reducing poverty7 %n addition: by !E,% estimates: < more t$an ;A:555 formerly unemployed persons &$o received skills training under t$e !ro/ect no& contribute about !,s445 million yearly to t$e economy7 FA7 *nnual savings of about >A million &ill be realized from improved road access7 )$ese savings from reduced ve$icle operating costs &ill induce a significant fall in passenger fares and cartage c$arges7 %mproved road access &ill also encourage a s$ift to&ard t$e production of $ig$( value crops: boosting farm incomes and generating employment for t$e landless population t$at depends on dryland farming in t$e pro/ect area7 FB7 )$e !ro/ect $as $ad many un?uantifiable benefits: suc$ as t$e production of additional crop by(products and forage for animals: skills development t$roug$ training: community co$esion t$roug$ community mobilization: overall improvements in t$e ?uality of life: and t$e empo&erment of &omen and t$eir gradual mainstreaming into t$e decision(making process7 *bout 4FI of t$e C Os mobilized by t$e !ro/ect &ere &omenKs C Os: =FI of t$e credit line &as e+tended to &omen: and about one fourt$ of CD sc$emes &ere undertaken by &omenKs COs7 ince t$e pro/ect area is in a remote and &ell(entrenc$ed tribal environment: t$ese activities $ave $ad a ma/or impact on mainstreaming &omen into economic activities7 Credit provision $as largely eased financial constraints on investments in production and liveli$ood opportunities7 FD7 )$e !ro/ect &as rated a category B pro/ect: &it$ no significant environmental impact envisaged at appraisal7 ,oad construction &as undertaken mainly under small: s$ort(term contracts &it$ fe& environmental issues because of t$e s$ort construction periods and t$e strict $ousekeeping measures enforced by t$e supervision consultants7 *ny land re?uired for minor improvements in alignment &as provided voluntarily by t$e communities7 )$e only concern &as t$e possible overe+ploitation of t$e D)Ws in t$e fres$&ater zone7 )$e D%! installed piezometers in t$e fres$&ater zones &$ere tube &ells &ere installed: to monitor t$e ground&ater disc$arge7 )$e D%! $as also developed a ground&ater regulation regime to be enforced by 6uly =55D to ensure t$e optimal use and continuous regulation of t$e available ground&ater7 IV. A. OVERALL ASSESS)ENT AND RECO))ENDATIONS
O#erall Assessment
FE7 Overall: t$e !ro/ect &as a success7 %ts interventions &ere carried out efficiently and effectively and yielded an overall positive impact compatible &it$ t$e !ro/ectKs appraised design and monitoring frame&ork 1*ppendi+ ;527 )$e institutional arrangements for t$e O&M of t$e infrastructure developed under t$e !ro/ect are likely to be sustainable7 F<7 )$e !ro/ect &as implemented as conceived at appraisal7 )$e only design elements t$at &ere revised during implementation &ere 1i2 t$e number of COs to be formed: and 1ii2 t$e lengt$ of rural roads to be upgraded to cater to a t$inly spread rural population and to ac$ieve t$e target of serving ;74 million people: as defined at appraisal7 )$e scope &as reduced for t$e
<
!E,%7 =55B7 .pdating the Ba!e&ine Sur'ey of the "era #ha$i %han Rura& "e'e&opment Pro(ect7 !akistan: -a$ore7
;F
surface irrigation subcomponent because of &ater rig$ts issues in t$e $ill torrent areas and t$e completion of &orks under ot$er programs: given t$e delayed start of t$e !ro/ect7 B. Lessons
A57 * multi(sector area development pro/ect cannot be implemented effectively at t$e local level &it$out 1i2 dedicated coordination and implementation units in eac$ district: 1ii2 dedicated staff and resources for all key %*s implementing t$e pro/ect: 1iii2 district rat$er t$an provincial governments $aving administrative control of %* staff: 1iv2 %*s being $eld accountable for progress: and 1v2 a tec$nical assistance component t$at ans&ers t$e re?uirements of t$e individual districts7 A;7 )$e market(based composite rates mec$anism establis$ed by t$e !un/ab government provided a risk(s$aring mec$anism in a very volatile market for construction materials: &$ic$ allo&ed contracts to be a&arded and completed for less t$an t$e estimated costs7 Effective procurement mec$anisms of risk s$aring in unstable price conditions attract private sector participation and allo& contracts to be a&arded at compatible rates7 A=7 * key reason for t$e success of t$e !ro/ect is t$e sustained operations of W0*s: COs: and COs formed and strengt$ened by t$e !ro/ect7 )$ese organizations &ere able to sustain t$emselves mainly because of t$eir small size 1average of ;F45 $ouse$olds2 and $omogeneity of members$ip: t$e demand(driven approac$ of t$e !ro/ect allo&ing communities to set priorities: and rigorous monitoring ensuring t$at all members of t$e community &ere &illing and &ould continue to contribute funds for t$e selected priorities7 A47 ,ural support organizations 1."Os2 interested in developing t$eir o&n constituencies are muc$ more effective intermediate partners in rural development pro/ects because of t$eir interest in continuity beyond t$e pro/ects7 )$e ."O under t$e !ro/ect maintained regular interaction and follo&(up &it$ COs: W0*s: and COs and follo&ed a pragmatic approac$ to institutional strengt$ening7 %t relied on simple and maintainable rules and roles based on t$e tec$nical: management: and absorptive capacity of t$e client COs: W0*s: and COs t$at contributed immensely to t$e sustained and transparent operations of t$ese organizations7 AF7 %n demand(driven community(based pro/ects: it is useful to follo& a supply(driven approac$ at t$e start: to be able to learn and to demonstrate t$e dynamics of different types of community subpro/ects7 Communities can t$us make informed c$oices about t$eir priorities 18to see is to believe92 and at t$e same time t$e %*s can learn and improve7 AA7 %nterventions related to &omen in conservative male(dominated societies &$ere la&s and customs impede &omenKs access to opportunities &ill succeed only if t$ey are implemented after a certain level of credibility $as been establis$ed &it$ suc$ communities and if t$e delivery approac$ respects t$e local norms and culture7 Customs: beliefs: and attitudes t$at confine &omen to limited roles c$ange incrementally: and aggressive approac$es to c$ange block t$e process of c$anging t$ese roles and status of &omen altoget$er7 Men and &omen play different roles: $ave different needs: and face different constraints in responding to specific opportunities7 %dentifying t$e rig$t entry points at t$e design stage based on t$ese roles: needs: and constraints is t$e key to successful operations and t$e start of t$e c$ange process7 %n t$e remote and resource( poor area pro/ect area: t$e credit and social infrastructure proved to be effective entry points for &omenKs empo&erment7
;A
AB7 )$e !M0s t$at &ill manage rural development pro/ects in remote locations must be empo&ered &it$ fle+ible tec$nical and incremental staff support to enable t$em to respond to t$e c$anging needs and capacity gaps of t$e institutions implementing t$e pro/ects at t$e local level7 )o make %*s accountable for t$e progress of t$eir respective components: funds s$ould be allocated directly to t$e annual development budgets of t$e %*s and pro/ect targets reflected in t$eir annual development plans7 AD7 "iving preference to t$e use and strengt$ening of local capacity to implement pro/ects is a c$allenging option at t$e start of a pro/ect7 Co&ever: local staff are easier to retainNa ma/or consideration in sustained implementation in remote areas7 C. Recommendations
AE7 "!t!re )onitoring. *lt$oug$ t$e !ro/ectKs roads &ere built to $ig$er specifications t$an originally planned and s$ould re?uire less maintenance: t$e !C, Mission recommended regular follo&(up7 )$e !un/ab government $as agreed to t$e regular monitoring of t$e O&M activities in t$e districts: to ensure t$e sustained O&M of t$e !ro/ectKs road infrastructure7 Monitoring &ill be undertaken by t$e district C&WD and reported to *DB every B mont$s7 A<7 "!rt-er Action or "ollo0+%'. Most of t$e !ro/ectKs activities in t$e agriculture: livestock: and ot$er productive subsectors under t$e CD and subsurface irrigation components &ere completed in =55B7 'or t$ese investments to reac$ t$eir full productive potential: t$e e+tension services to t$e COs must continue7 0nder a recent initiative of t$e !un/ab government: livestock and agriculture e+tension services are being &idely provided in D" #$an7 )$ese activities are also being supported under * !-(%%7 )$e agriculture and livestock departments $ave committed to provide e+tension services and ot$er concessions to pro/ect COs in particular: as t$ese CO net&orks offer an ideal platform for suc$ activities7 * list and profile of pro/ect COs $as been provided to t$ese departments at t$e district level7 B57 )$e C&WD $as committed to develop a policy of incentives and penalties to ensure t$e effective use of O&M funds7 )$e !C, Mission observed t$at road s$oulders in certain areas &$ere t$e soil te+ture &as &eak needed to be encased in stable soil to c$eck erosion7 )$e C&WD $as agreed to undertake t$is &ork under t$e district O&M budget if erosion is observed7 B;7 Additional Assistance. )$e pro/ect area still $as very $ig$ poverty: and t$ere is great potential for &ater $arvesting and &ater management infrastructure: since &ater is t$e lifeline of most economic activities7 )$e !un/ab government $as already begun suc$ pro/ects &it$ its o&n funds and support from *DB 1)* FE5=(!*#M and C$as$ma ,ig$t Bank %rrigation !ro/ect: tage %%%: -oan ;;FB(!*#O 'P27 Co&ever: t$ere is still a large unmet demand for community and social infrastructure t$at t$e !ro/ect &it$ its limited scope and time frame could not accommodate7 * follo&(on pro/ect in t$e social sector may be &arranted7 B=7 Timing o Pro&ect Per ormance E#al!ation Re'ort. )$e pro/ect performance evaluation report can be prepared anytime after =55E to allo& t$e !ro/ectKs CD sc$emesN especially t$e grain &are$ouses: and t$e poultry and cattle s$edsNto become fully establis$ed7 Most of t$ese &ere completed in late =55B and still need time and effort to realize t$eir full potential7
-e& initiati!e to increase the num$er of $eneficiaries to 5,666 consumers in tri$al areas. DERA GHAZI KHAN A sum o! Rs"## million would $e spent on "%# solar power generating schemes that will $e launched in the tri$al areas o! DG Khan and Ra&anpur districts to supply power to '(### consumers in the area) +he schemes &oul $e e/ecute un er the +ri$al )rea De!elopment "ro#ect 8+)D">, 0uhamma Rashee )n&ar, the +)D" superinten ing engineer, sai on +ues ay. ?e sai that 168 solar po&er schemes ha earlier $een complete in =66( an =616 in the tri$al areas of DG Khan. +hese schemes &ere operating successfully an supplying electricity to =,666 homes, he sai . +he ne& initiati!e &oul increase the num$er of $eneficiaries to 5,666 consumers in tri$al areas, he a e . FEighty per cent fun ing for the pro#ect &oul $e pro!i e $y the go!ernment an the rest &ill $e a e in $y the community.G
*ppendi+ ;
;B
Com'onent
Acti#ities
)TR Targets
Act!all$ Ac-ie#ed
4 Irrigation Im'ro#ement 1i2 ,e$abilitation of S!r ace Irrigation t$e command area of 1i2 Minor improvements in e+isting temporary about B:F;5 $a of diversion $ead&orks land currently and structures at receiving irrigation @e$ova: and &aterM and 1ii2 strengt$ening of development of about eart$&orks in A km of =:<;5 $a of land not #a$a main c$annelM yet receiving 1ii2 !artial lining of main irrigation &ater7 supply c$annel 1E km #a$a and E km @e$ova2M
Minor improvements in e+isting temporary diversion $ead&orks and structures at #a$a main c$annel7
Minor improvements in five e+isting temporary diversion $ead&orks and structures at #a$a $ill torrent &ere completed7
)arget scrapped as &ork &as already completed before t$e !ro/ect7 cope &as reduced to A5 WCs in #a$a only: as no &orks could be undertaken in @e$ova because of &ater rig$ts issues7
.ot done7 Work already completed before t$e !ro/ect by !un/ab government7 A5 W0*s &ere formed and ;5 WCs &it$ total lengt$ of 45 km &ere partially lined 1;5 km27 )$ere &as lack of demand because of a parallel program of t$e government: not re?uiring any up(front community contribution: under &$ic$ all remaining F5 WCs &ere completed7
1iii2 'ormation of about ;55 W0*s and improvement of about ;55 WCs &it$ one t$ird of t$e lengt$ lined 1455 km27
S!bs!r ace Irrigation 1i2 'ormation of about ;55 W0*s: installation of ;55 D)Ws: improvement of about ;55 km of WCs: and lining of about 44 km of WC lengt$M .o c$ange7 %n total: ;4B W0*s completed &ork on ;4B D)Ws: and 44 km of F5 WCs &it$ a total lengt$ of A5 km &ere lined7 )$e number of WCs &as reduced because ;5 &ere completed under a parallel program of t$e government: &$ic$ did not re?uire any up(front community contribution7
*ppendi+ ;
;D
Com'onent
Acti#ities 1ii2 Monitoring of t$e rec$arge of t$e s&eet( &ater zone: &$ere t$e tube &ells are installed7
Mobilization and capacity development of B55 COs 1&it$ an average of =A members eac$: for a total of ;A:555 members2: about F5I of &$ic$ &ere &omen COs or mi+ed COs: and implementation of subpro/ects identified by t$e COs in t$e follo&ing areasH 1i2 Cill torrent irrigation improvement: 1ii2 oil and &ater conservation: Acti#ities 1iii2 *gricultural production: 1iv2 -ivestock production: and 1v2 @illage infrastructure improvement
Mobilization and capacity development of ;:;55 COs 1&it$ an average of ;F members eac$: for a total of ;A:555 members2: about F5I of &$ic$ &ere &omen COs or mi+ed COs: and implementation of subpro/ects identified by t$e COs7 .o c$ange7 .o c$ange7 )TR Targets .o c$ange7 .o c$ange7 .o c$ange7
Act!all$ Ac-ie#ed )$e ground&ater &as monitored during implementation t$roug$ piezometers installed in tube &ells7 .o reduction in t$e &ater table &as noted and t$e D%!: t$e %* for t$is component: continues to monitor t$e &ater table7 %n total ;:;;5 COs 1&it$ an average of =A members eac$: for a total of ;A:AB5 members2 &ere mobilized and capacity building &as undertakenM of t$is total: =AI &ere &omen COs and <I &ere mi+ed COs7 )$ese COs implemented ;:F<E subpro/ects t$ey t$emselves identified7 == subpro/ects =;= subpro/ects Act!all$ Ac-ie#ed 4DA subpro/ects 4B5 subpro/ects F=E subpro/ects
7.7 R!ral Roads ,e$abilitate and upgrading of selected rural roads to specifications sufficient to ensure durability and minimize maintenance7 %mprovement of about ;DA km of rural roads7 %mprovement of up to F=A km of rural roads7 *bout 4E< km of rural roads &ere upgraded to $ig$er specifications as agreed at appraisal to ensure durability and minimize maintenance7
;E
*ppendi+ ;
Com'onent
Act!all$ Ac-ie#ed * road maintenance budget of !,s44:555 per km of road &as set up by t$e !un/ab government7 More t$an ;:F<F COs 14FI of t$ese &omen COs2: &it$ a total members$ip of about =A:555: &ere establis$ed7 * credit line of >=7D million &as provided to ., !: and ;;5:555 sub(loans &ere financed over D(year implementation period7 ,ecovery rate above <EI7 ."O completed management training for more t$an =:E55 CO members and skills training for ;=:A55 ot$er members7 Outstanding savings of C Os totaled >;75F million at completion7
7.9 "inancial Ser#ices ocial mobilization Establis$ment of about for group(based ;:555 village COs lending for economic empo&erment of t$e t$at reac$ about =A:555 rural members7 rural poor7 !rovision of credit line of >=7D million to ., !M financing of more t$an 4B:555 sub( loans recycled over A( year implementation period7 ,ecovery rate of <5I or above7 Management training for about =:555 CO leaders 1t&o per CO2 and skills training for about F:555 ot$er members7 Mobilization of voluntary savings totaling about >455:555 for on(lending by COs7
.o c$ange7
.o c$ange7
.o c$ange7 .o c$ange7
.o c$ange7
CO J community organization: C O J community services organizations: D)W J deep(turbine tube &ell: km J kilometer: ."O J nongovernment organization: CO J savings and credit organization: WC J &ater course: W0* J &ater users association ourceH !ro/ect Management 0nit
*ppendi+ =
;<
=5
*ppendi+ =
*ppendi+ 4
=;
CO)PLETION DATES O" R%RAL ROADS %NDER T.E D.G. 2.AN R%RAL DEVELOP)ENT PRO,ECT
Sr. No.
Road Name
Lengt:(ms;
Contractor Name
Com'letion Date
A. District D.G. 2-an ; #ot Qaisrani to -itra = #utani to -ak$ani 4 C$urkan to )remman F )urutti ,o$ri to ,a/$ani A 1a2 !ull Qamber to Basti iani 1b2 .e& Culvert7 B ,ak$i Mon$ to D$oli7 D !ull 'ayaz to #ot Casso E "raveyard 1C$oti Rareen2 to D7" Canal < Cement 'actory()aunsa link road to san/ar&ala ;5 ;; ;= ;4 ;F 6$anda More to Basti #aloi Briot Mumdani to #o$ar road 6$oke Bodo to B$ati #azmi C$o&k to More 6$ungi !ul Qambar to "ovt7 !rimary c$ool *ziz *bad via Basti C$andia Bait a&ai road to Bait 'a?eer &ali Darbar Mian Mattay to "ammun &ala #ot C$utta Dra$ma road to amina !ir &ala #ot Qaisrani pacca road to basti Buzdar D$odak road to Basti -anger &ala via an&al &ala Bindi Daira $a$ road to Basti Ca/i %?bal Mar$a !acca !eer *dil road to Basti *lla$ Bak$s$ *rain7 #$ak$i amina ,oad to Basti *lla$ $adan -und to Bait $adan to C$ak Danda ,oad C$atri to Batla to #ot Qasirani -itra road Basti )ub to Basti Man/$ot$a Basti B$utta road to Basti -al &ali to Basti #an/oo &ali #$ak$i Dera ,oad to #$o/ay &ala via #$ak$i &ala and #$ugi Baig&ala Manka Basti $er Mu$ammad Buzdar to Basti Dur M7 #ac$ela C$ungi Dambra$ to Basti Cas$im Ca/ana amina C$o&k to !ull $oria
=<75B E7=A =574B D755 B7A5 5755 D7E5 A7AB =7B= =7== =7;F F755 A7DE 47A< A755
=D7E; E7=A =57;B D755 B7=5 5755 D7E5 A7AB =7B= =7== =7;F F755 A7DE 47A< F7DB
MLs ar&ar & Co MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs Cidayatulla$ & Co MLs ,amzan & Co MLs aleem Brot$ers MLs *lla$ Buk$s$ MLs *bdul Wa$eed MLs ,amzan & Co MLs Wa$eed & Co MLs aleem Brot$ers MLs MLs MLs MLs ,amzan ,amzan ,amzan ,amzan & Co & Co & Co & Co
45L;;L5B 45L;;L5B ;AL5FL5B ;=(;5(5B 45L5BL5A =FL54L5B 45L;;L5B 5=(;=(5F ==L;5L5F 45L5<L5F 5;(;5(5F 45L5EL5B ;FL5DL5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B
=D7E; E7=A =57;B D755 B7=5 5755 D7E5 A7AB =7B= =7== =7;F F755 A7DE 47A< F7DB
;A ;B ;D ;E ;< =5 =; == =4 =F =A =B =D
B755 F7<5 F755 =7AF =7AB =7<B 4755 =7DE 47=5 F755 A7=A 47A5 =74E
A7DD F7<5 F755 =7AF =7AB =7<B 4755 =7=4 47=5 F755 A7=A 47=< ;7E4
MLs ,amzan & Co MLs ,amzan & Co MLs ,amzan & Co MLs Cassan Ma$mood MLs Da&n Cons Co MLs Da&n Cons Co MLs Da&n Cons Co MLs Da&n Cons Co MLs Da&n Cons Co MLs %ftik$ar & Co MLs 6am Brot$ers MLs Ca/i "$ulam ar&ar and Co MLs Ca/i "$ulam ar&ar and Co MLs Ca/i "$ulam ar&ar and Co MLs Wa$eed & Co MLs Wa$eed & Co
=AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B 45L5EL5B ;4L54L5B ;EL54L5B =BL54L5B =BL5FL5B =DL54L5B =DL5FL5B =BL5BL5B 45L;;L5B =AL5<L5B
A7DD F7<5 F755 =7AF =7AB =7<B 4755 =7=4 47=5 F755 A7=A 47=< ;7E4
=E =< 45
==
*ppendi+ 4
Sr. No.
Road Name
Lengt:(ms;
Act!al Lengtor Com'letion :(ms; =755 =755 47=5 ;755 =7A5 4755 =755 47<= =7E5 47BA
Contractor Name
Com'letion Date
Act!al Com'leted Lengt=755 =755 47=5 ;755 =7A5 4755 =755 47<= =7E5 47BA
4; 4= 44 4F 4A 4B 4D 4E 4< F5
Cyder C$o&k 1D7"7 C$oti ,oad2 to basti "ud !ur Manka Canal to C$it irkani via Basti -urk$ay&ala ,as$eed *bad 1Multan ,oad2 to C$a$ amandary &ala -alay &ala .ai &ala via "$ousabad to Basti 6uma Wakilan &ala to .ala amendri &ala via $a$il &ala %ndus Cig$&ay to .oorpur 6am&ani 6$oke 0tra 6$ak$ar %mam Wasay &ala to Moc$i &ala via D$ole &ala Mamoori #ot C$utta ,oad to basti #appar %ndus $ig$&ay 1C$o&k C$uratta2 to .ational Cig$&ay 1Mustafa C$o&k2 C$oti "rid tation to Basti "ulzar C$andia $er Mu$ammad Buzdar to .ika )alpur1Cead Rero2 6ampur Da/al #m no7 ;F bo$ar Catti Bodla Minor .otak $eroo to Mana *$madani 6ampur da/al road #m .o7 ;5 to petrol pump .oor Mu$ammad Dubba Darri 3aray &ala to Calla &it$ link to Basti C$akar #$an "$ousabad road to Bangla $edani #ala Bait .urak$y road to Camza "adai link to Basti %?bal #$an !ull $a$ on$ar to *$med &ala via basti B$adi Ma$ar Basti Ela$i Bak$s$ to B$atti Metela Basti #$ak$i to Dra$ama #ot C$utta via Basti C$anar Mit$ay Wali to B$uc$ #ala to Basti ,amin Manka Canal to Dark$&ast Minor via Basti *bdul ,as$id C$andia
=755 47D5 474E =7A5 =7A5 4755 =7DE F7;5 =7E5 47BA
MLs Wa$eed & Co MLs Wa$eed & Co MLs Wa$eed & Co MLs *rs$ad 6amil MLs *rs$ad 6amil MLs #$an Const7 Co MLs #$an Const7 Co MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs Manzoor Brot$ers
=BL54L5B =AL5<L5B ;EL5FL5B ;DL5<L5B =EL54L5B ;AL5AL5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B
F; F= F4 FF FA FB FD FE F< A5 A; A= A4 AF AA
47DE F7A5 4755 F7=D =7DF =7DF 47=A 4755 =7A5 =7DF =7DB F7=A ;7E= 47B5 47FE 899.47 A7EE =7AB 47;F B7E5 A7DB F7;D
47DE F7A5 4755 F7;A =7DF =7BE =7<A =7<5 =7A5 =7DF =7DB F7=A ;7E= 47B5 47FE 876.96 A7D< =7AB 47;F B7=5 A7DB F7;D
MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs Cafeez and Co MLs Cafeez and Co MLs Cafeez and Co MLs $af?at Mansoor MLs $af?at Mansoor MLs 6an Mu$ammad MLs %ndus ervices MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs Da&n Cons Co MLs %ndus ervices MLs Manzoor Brot$ers
=AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =AL5<L5B =BL54L5B =AL5<L5B ;AL5AL5B =BL54L5B 45L;;L5B =4L5BL5B 45L;;L5B 45L;;L5B
47DE F7A5 4755 F7;A =7DF =7BE =7<A =7<5 =7A5 =7DF =7DB F7=A ;7E= 47B5 47FE 876.96
!ull ,angay Wali to 6indani road s!btotal :a; B. District Ra&an'!r ; = 4 F A B Murg$ai to #otla aid #$an Burceabad to Bait auntra Basti 6affar $a$ to Cazrat Wala Cead )allai to Basti "7 ,asool Basti .oor !ur to Basti adi? Da$a Wang(Burceabad to C$a$ Da$a
MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs Wa$eed & Co MLs Wa$eed & Co MLs aleem Brot$ers MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs *llied Const7 Co
*ppendi+ 4
=4
Sr. No.
Road Name
Lengt:(ms;
Act!al Lengtor Com'letion :(ms; F755 F7;; =7D5 A755 4755 ;=755 F7;5
Contractor Name
Com'letion Date
D E < ;5 ;; ;= ;4
"$azi C$o&k to .alla$ aiban7 Mirran ak$i to Wang Mu$ammad&ala to Basti Mu$ammad Cussain Wadoo Mu$ammad !ur Basti Cameed to Basti Maula Bu+ Wa/ar Da/al to Carrand 1"roup(%2 Ca/ipur to ,a/anpur "$azi C$o&k to #ot )a$ir ,oad from Basti *lla$ Ditta -ak$a to $eroo road Mug$al &ala to Basti !aoli $ero road 1#$oka B$ibrian2 to !eer 6$ungi !uk$ta link road $a$ 6amal Colony via !at&ari Wal Bag$ to #arla "$amo !uk$ta "addan bund to basti #$utra "ovt7 !rimary c$ool Basti !rir$ar to ikandar !itafi Wala Basti Mustafa "ola to "ola More via Mulazim Cussain Balac$ani *?il pur road to C$o&k Qures$i to $ikar !ur via /am ,asul Bak$s$ Ca/ipur to #$alil Mak&al via 6am *fzal Burra -u?ra Mastoi *gency Basti Dr7 adi? to c$o&k Darbar bac$al 'a?ir a$ib Basti ind "abool to Basti yed *$san $amsi Dangar Quarter yed *bdul ,e$man to pull Qadra canal .oorpur Cospital to Basti Bo$ar *&iray &ala Basti Wazeer Cussain arai to Ca/ipur Basti *lla$ Buk$s$ Mac$i to /am #abir 6$abail 6uma Wa$ to Basti *lla$ Buk$s$ Mac$$i7 C$o&k -ia?at abad to Bac$ao& Bund via Basti Wa$i Malik Basti !u/abi and Dera ardar 'aiz #$an Basti Mayo to .os$era "$arbi Cyp$on )$ingana to Basti Camid "indani C$akar Buzdar to Basti Bud$ Basti Dina to Basti Cot$i %ndus $ig$&ay C$akki to Basti Ca/i "ul Mu$ammad B$ani #otla ,ubait c$o&k to .alla$ Qutab via c$ak !atiat
MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs Manzoor Brot$ers MLs aleem Brot$ers MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs Manzoor Brot$ers
;F ;A ;B
MLs C7 *bdul ,aza? MLs C$7 ,iaz *$mad MLs C$7 ,iaz *$mad
;D ;E ;< =5 =; == =4 =F =A =B =D =E =<
=7A5 4755 =7A5 =7A5 B7A5 =7A5 =7A5 4755 47A5 =7DA A755 F7F5 47;5
=7A5 4755 =7A5 =7A5 B7A5 =7A5 =7A5 4755 47A5 =7DA A755 F7F5 47;5
MLs Malik M7 a//ad MLs Malik M7 a//ad MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs 6avaid %?bal & Co MLs 6avaid %?bal & Co MLs 6avaid %?bal & Co MLs *sif ana MLs $af?at Mansoor MLs Mu$ammad a//ad MLs Mu$ammad a//ad MLs 6an Mu$ammad
45L5DL5B 45L5BL5B =FL5BL5B =5L5BL5B 45L5<L5B 45L5BL5B ;=(54(5B ;=(54(5B 45L5<L5B 45L5FL5B =;L5AL5B =;L5FL5B ;FL54L5B
=7A5 4755 =7A5 =7A5 B7A5 =7A5 =7A5 4755 47A5 =7DA A755 F7F5 47;5
45 4; 4= 44 4F 4A
MLs 6avaid %?bal & Co MLs Mu$ammad a//ad MLs Mu$ammad a//ad MLs C7 *bdul ,aza? MLs 6avaid %?bal & Co MLs yed Const7 Co
=F
*ppendi+ 4
Sr. No.
Road Name
Lengt:(ms;
Act!al Lengtor Com'letion :(ms; =7A5 =7A5 =7A5 F755 47;5 F755 467.=< 7=>.74
Contractor Name
Com'letion Date
Act!al Com'leted Lengt=7A5 =7A5 =7A5 F755 47;5 F755 467.=< 7=>.74
4B 4D 4E 4< F5 F;
Basti *rain to Basti "$ulam Caider "opang Basti .oor Muammad Balo$ra to Basti !iran Ditta Basti !$ali to Bambka road to Basti 'au/a Miranpur !$atak to Badli ,ail&ay tation !rimary c$ool D$ora Casil to Badli ,ail&ay tation Basti Murad 6$ullan via Basti #arim Bak$s$ s!btotal :B; Total
MLs C$7 ,iaz *$mad MLs C$7 ,iaz *$mad MLs Rubair Const7 Co MLs *llied Const7 Co MLs 6avaid %?bal MLs Mu$ammad a//ad
*ppendi+ F
=A
AC.IEVE)ENT %NDER T.E R%RAL "INANCIAL SERVICES CO)PONENT "ebr!ar$ 4>>> to No#ember 855< Gender Com'onent?Acti#it$ Detail Acti#ities )en <EA7555 ;<:A4D7555 A=7F<5 @omen A5<7555 A:4F=7555 <7<E5 Total ;:F<F7555 =F:ED<7555 B=7FD5
'ormation of aving and Credit Organizations 1 COs2 COs Members$ip aving "enerated by COs 1Million ,s72 ub(loans *gri(%nputs -ivestock Enterprise %%E Total Credit Disbursement 1Million ,s72 *gri(%nputs -ivestock Enterprise %%E a Total
a
=B
*ppendi+ A
APPRAISED AND CO)PLETED COSTS O" T.E PRO,ECT )able *A7;H Detailed !ro/ect Costs :B million; At A''raisal "oreign At Com'letion "oreign
Item A. In#estment Costs 4. Ci#il @or(s a7 Construction Material Work F75; =47DA 8. Contract Management taff 7. Credit a7 Credit -ine b7 ."OH Credit and avings S!btotal :A7; 9. Domestic Cons!lting Ser#ices a7 Baseline and %mpact tudies b7 Benefit Monitoring and Evaluation Consutants c7 Contract *greement Consultants d7 Engineering Design Consultants S!btotal :A9; 6. ."O upport ervices <. Office E?uipment A. @e$icles Total In#estment Costs B. Incremental Administration Costs 4. %ncremental O&M 8. Office Over$ead 7. Watercourse urvey and Design Total Administration Costs Total Baseline Costs C. Contingencies 4. !$ysical Contingencies 8. !rice Continencies Total Baseline Costs and Contingencies ervice C$arge During Construction Total
Local
Total
Local
Total
;E7;E ;7AB F7=A ;74A =7BD 57=F =7<; 57A< 57;= 5754 57;A 57E< ;7DB 575; 57;D 457E4 F7;A 57=< 57AB A755 4A7E5 ;745 4745 F57F5 ( F57F5
F7=A
==7F= ;7AB F75; =D7<< ;74A =7BD 57F4 47;5 57A< 57;= 5754 57;A 57E< ;7<B 5754 574F 4A7BA F7== 57=< 57B5 A7;; F57D5 ;7B5 47E5 FB7;5 ;7D5 FD7E5
S S S 447EF ;7;5 S S 575F 57;4 5755 575F 57FD 57BF =7;D 575= 57;F 4D7<A S 57;5 575F 57;F 4E75<
SS SS SS B7<=
b7 Eart$ c7 -abor S!btotal :A4; F57DB ;7;5 S S =7E= 57;4 5755 575F 57FD 57BF =7;D 57;4 57F4 FE75F S 57;5 575F 57;F FE7;E
( 57;< 57;<
S =7DE
57=5 575= 57;D F7E= 575D 575F 57;; F7<5 5745 57A5 A7D5 ;7D5 D7F5
;575<
4E75< ( 4E75<
."O J nongovernment organization: O&M J operation and maintenance7 ourceH *DBTs -oan 'inancial %nformation ystem: !ro/ect Management 0nit7
*ppendi+ A
=D
=E
*ppendi+ A
*ppendi+ B
=<
Cear
Contract A0ards Pro&ected Act!al C!m!lati#e ;7555 47555 47F45 F7A55 B7555 B7555 ;;7555 E7E55 A7ADB 574=4 57;FB 574A; =7A4E 47EAF ;475;B B7AEB 57=4B A7ADB A7E<< B75FA B74<B E7<4F ;=7DEE =A7E5F 4=74<5 4=7B=B
Disb!rsements Pro&ected 57E55 47=55 47==5 47555 A7555 A7A55 D7555 ;<7555 ;7A55 Act!al 57BAB 57;DB 574;B =7=55 ;7ADD 47DDF B744= ;47=AD =75AB C!m!lati#e 57BAB 57E4= ;7;FE 474FE F7<=A E7B<< ;A754; =E7=EE 4574FF
45
*ppendi+ D
*ppendi+ E
4;
CO)PLIANCE @IT. LOAN COVENANTS Re erence *rticle %@: -* ection F75; Co#enant )$e Borro&er s$all cause !un/ab to carry out t$e Complied7 !ro/ect &it$ due diligence and efficiency and in conformity &it$ sound administrative: financial: engineering: environmental: rural road construction: agricultural and irrigation development: building and small(scale infrastructure construction: and institutional support practices7 %n t$e carrying out of t$e !un/ab and operation of t$e !ro/ect facilities: t$e Borro&er s$all perform: or cause to be performed: all obligations set fort$ in c$edule B to t$is -oan *greement7 )$e Borro&er s$all make available to !un/ab: or Complied7 cause !un/ab to make available: promptly as needed: and on terms and conditions acceptable to t$e Bank: t$e funds: facilities: services: land and ot$er resources &$ic$ are re?uired: in addition to t$e proceeds of t$e -oan: for t$e carrying out of t$e !ro/ect7 )$e Borro&er s$all keep t$e Bank advised of t$e progress in budgetary allocations and releases of t$e funds of t$e !ro/ect7 !rior to t$e start of eac$ fiscal year during !ro/ect implementation: t$e Borro&er s$all furnis$ to t$e Bank a draft financing plan for t$e !ro/ect in respect of !un/abKs *nnual Development !rogram7 )$e Borro&er s$all ensure t$at t$e activities of its Complied7 departments and agencies &it$ respect to t$e carrying out of t$e !ro/ect and operation of t$e !ro/ect facilities are conducted and coordinated in accordance &it$ sound administrative policies and procedures7 )$e Borro&er s$all furnis$: of cause to be furnis$ed: to t$e Bank all suc$ reports and information as t$e Bank s$all responsibly re?uest concerning 1i2 t$e -oan: and t$e e+penditure of t$e proceeds and maintenance of t$e service t$ereofM 1ii2 t$e goods and services and ot$er items of e+penditure financed out of t$e proceeds of t$e -oanM 1iii2 t$e !ro/ectM 1iv2 t$e administration: operations and financial conditions of !ro/ect E+ecuting *gency: t$e implementation *gencies: and any ot$er agencies of t$e Borro&er responsible for t$e carrying out t$e !ro/ect and operation of t$e !ro/ect facilities: or any part t$ereofM 1v2 financial and economic conditions in t$e territory of t$e Borro&er and t$e international balance(of( payments position of t$e Borro&erM and 1vi2 any ot$er matters relating to t$e purposes of t$e -oan7 Complied7 *ll t$e progress reports: audit reports: and ot$er pro/ect related reports &ere provided promptly7 Stat!s
4=
*ppendi+ E
Co#enant Stat!s )$e Borro&er s$all enable t$e BankKs representatives Complied7 to inspect t$e !ro/ect: t$e foods financed out of t$e proceeds of t$e -oan: and any relevant records and documents7 )$e Borro&er s$all take all actions &$ic$ s$all be Complied7 necessary on its part to enable !un/ab to perform its obligations under t$e !ro/ect *greement: and s$all not take or permit any action &$ic$ &ould interfere &it$ t$e performance of suc$ obligations7 %t is t$e mutual interaction of t$e Borro&er and t$e Bank Complied7 t$at no ot$er e+ternal debt o&ed a creditor ot$er t$an t$e Bank s$all $ave any priority over t$e -oan by &ay of a lien on t$e assets of t$e Borro&er7 !DD s$all be t$e pro/ect E+ecuting *gency and s$all provide overall !ro/ect guidance and coordination7 )$e !M0 s$all be responsible for management and coordination of t$e !ro/ect: including all procurement and t$e approval of subpro/ects7 )$e !M0 s$all implement parts 1ii2: 1iii2 and 1iv2 of part five of t$e pro/ect7 Complied7 Complied7
)$e !M0 $eaded by a pro/ect Director: s$all $ave an Complied7 %mplementation: !lanning: and Monitoring section and a Management and Contracts section: eac$ $eaded by a Deputy !ro/ect Director: and ade?uate support staff and e?uipment7 )$e !ro/ect Director and t&o Deputy Directors s$all $ave ?ualifications employees for t$e duration of t$e !ro/ect7 )$e %mplementing *gencies %ncludeH 1i2 DOWM: for part one 1a2 1iii2 : part one 1b2: and a portion of part t&o 1a2 of t$e !ro/ectM 1ii2 D%! for t$e c$annel improvements under !art one 1a2 1i2 and 1ii2 of t$e !ro/ect: and a !ortion of part )&o 1a2 of t$e !ro/ectM 1iii2 DO*: for part )&o 1b2 and 1c2 of t$e !ro/ectH 1iv2DO-: for part )&o 1d2 of t$e !ro/ect M 1v2 -",DO: for part )&o 1e2 of t$e !ro/ectM 1vi2 CWD: for part )$ree of t$e !ro/ectM 1vii2 ., !: for part 'our and part 1i2 of part 'ive of t$e !ro/ectM and 1viii2 )$e !M0: for parts 1ii2 : 1iii2 and 1iv2 of part 'ive of t$e !ro/ect7 Complied7 Minor e+ception &it$ regard to -",DD for &$ic$ a minor c$ange of implementation arrangement &as approved7
*ppendi+ E
44
Co#enant Stat!s Wit$in t$ree mont$s of t$e effective Date: !un/ab s$all Complied7 ! C $ad ;; establis$ t$e pro/ect steering Committee: &$ic$ s$all be meetings7 t$e overall: senior oversig$t body for pro/ect implementation7 )$e pro/ect steering Committee s$all comprise secretaries of t$e concerned departments: t$e Ceads of t$e relevant line departments and ."Os: and may include members of ot$er organizations as appropriate7 )$e pro/ect steering Committee s$all be $eaded by t$e c$airperson of t$e planning and Development Board: )$e !ro/ect steering Committee s$all meet at least t&ice a year: and s$all approve yearly and $alf( yearly implementation of t$e pro/ect7 Wit$in t$ree mont$s of t$e Effective Date: !un/ab s$all establis$ t$e !CC in D7"7#$an Division to deal &it$ operational and implementation matters and progress7 )$e !CC s$all be c$aired by t$e Commissioner: D7"7#$an Division: and s$all consist of Divisional government officers from t$e %mplementing *gencies7 ,epresentatives of ot$er private and public entities &it$ a role in t$e !ro/ect s$all also be represented on t$e !CC7 )$e ecretary of !CC s$all be t$e !ro/ect Director7 )$e !CC s$all meet at least ?uarterly: and s$all revie& plans: address coordination issues: and identity and resolve obstacles in !ro/ect %mplementation7 !artly Complied7 Only one meeting $eld during t$e initial p$ase of t$e !ro/ect7 Co&ever: as a result of devolution: t$e administrative divisions &ere abolis$ed: and t$e DCC could no longer function7
)o ?ualify for assistance under t$e !ro/ect: eac$ Complied7 component s$all satisfy selection criteria acceptable to t$e Bank7
S!r ace Irrigation -* c$edule @%: DOWM and D%! s$all &ork &it$ W0*s: &$ic$ &ill be Complied *ll W0*s !aragrap$ E organized and strengt$ened by ., ! and registered formed: strengt$ened by by DOWM at t$e District level7 ., !: &ere registered &it$ Directorate of O'WM and %rrigation Department7 -* c$edule @%: )ec$nical guidance s$all be provided t$roug$ a Complied7 !aragrap$ < DOWM field team and t$e e+isting staff of D%!7 -* c$edule @%: !aragrap$ ;5 )$e !M0 s$all approve t$e selection of c$annels and &atercourses to be improved under t$e !ro/ect based on t$e recommendations of D%! and DOWM7 Contract agreements &ill be e+ecuted bet&een t$e W0*s and t$e %mplementing *gencies: &$ereby t$e W0*s agree to procure all construction materials: complete t$e improvement &orks: properly use t$e !ro/ect funds provided: and implement all O&M activities7 DO* s$all provide e+tension services for t$is component7 Complied7 C$annels &ere recommended by D%!: &$ile DOWM seconded a team of si+ staff to t$e !M0 for &atercourse component7 )$e contracts &ere e+ecuted &it$ t$e W0*s7
4F
*ppendi+ E
Co#enant 'or t$e Watercourse %mprovements: t$e W0*s s$all contribute =5 percent of all materials paid advance: soil for eart$&orks: and all O&M7 'or t$e main c$annel improvements: t$e W0*s s$all supply soil for eart$&orks and all O&M7 %n addition: farmers s$all supply all skilled and unskilled labour for t$e &atercourse and main c$annel improvement &orks7
Stat!s Complied on all ot$er accounts e+cept labor cost for main c$annels improvement: for &$ic$ *DB provided special &eaver due to lack of affordability of COs: to s$are cost of t$e main c$annel7 Complied7
T!be0ell Irrigation -* c$edule @%: )$e implementation arrangements for t$is component !aragrap$ ;= of t$e !ro/ect s$all be similar to t$ose under !art One 1a2 of t$e !ro/ect7 -* c$edule @%: !aragrap$ ;4 )$e W0*s s$all be organized and strengt$ened by ., ! and registered by DOWM at t$e District level7 )$e W0*s s$all procure t$e tube(&ells: materials and carry out t$e re?uired &orks: including contracting for t$e drilling &orks re?uired7 )$e W0*s s$all contribute =5 percent of t$e cost of materials and installation in advance for tube(&ells and &atercourse improvement re?uired labour 1bot$ skill and unskilled2: soil for eart$&orks: and subse?uent O&M7 One DOWM field team s$all be provided to assist t$e W0*s7 DOWM s$all monitor t$e ground&ater rec$arge and ?uality in coordination &it$ W*!D*7 DO* s$all provide e+tension component7 services for t$is
Complied( W0*s $ave been organized and strengt$ened by &ater management team of !M0L., !7 W0*s s$are =5 percent cost: provide labor and soil: procure materials and carry out re?uired &orks including contracting all types of &ork7
Complied7
Comm!nit$ De#elo'ment S!b'ro&ects -* c$edule @%: )$e %mplementing *gencies: DOWM: D%!: DO*: DO-: Complied7 !aragrap$ ;A and -",DD: s$all &ork &it$ t$e COs to implement t$is component of t$e !ro/ect7 -* c$edule @%: !aragrap$ ;B )$e COs s$all be organized and strengt$ened by ., !: an e+perienced: domestic ."O: and t$e COs s$all be registered by t$e ocial Welfare Department at t$e divisional level: based on a feasibility report prepared by t$e ub(District(-evel ocial Welfare Officer7 )$e O&M arrangements s$all be conducted entirely by t$e COs7 Complied ( COs strengt$ened by ., !7 )$ese COs $ave been clustered and registered as CCBs under -"O =55;7 %ndividual registration of !ro/ect CO is not re?uired7 *bout FB million $as been saved by CO for O&M7
)$e COs s$all contribute ;5 percent of t$e cost of Complied7 materials in advance: re?uired labour 1bot$ skilled and unskilled2: soil for eart$&orks: and subse?uent O&M for t$e activities to be carried out under t$is component of t$e !ro/ect7 %n consultation &it$ t$e !CC: t$e !M0 s$all approve Complied7 t$e selection of all Community Development ub( !ro/ects to be implemented under t$e !ro/ect7
*ppendi+ E
4A
Co#enant Stat!s )$e follo&ing guidelines s$all apply to t$e Complied7 infrastructure &orks under t$is component of t$e !ro/ect7 1i2 )$e ma+imum cost for any individual ub( !ro/ect under t$is !ro/ect component: ot$er t$an $ill torrent ub(!ro/ects: s$all be t$e e?uivalent of >=5:555 at ;<<D prices: unless proposals for more costly ub(!ro/ects $ave been revie&ed by t$e !M0 and submitted to t$e Bank for approval prior to implementationM 1ii2 * representative of t$e Bank &ill participate in t$e revie& by t$e ! C of all Cill )orrent ub(!ro/ects prior to t$e approval of suc$ ub( !ro/ectsM 1iii2 *ny ub(!ro/ect s$all $ave a minimum cost of >;:555 e?uivalent and benefit no fe&er t$an ;5 $ouse$oldsM and 1iv2 )$e estimated implementation period s$all be si+ to nine mont$s: &it$ a ma+imum period of ;= mont$s7 !riority in t$e implementation of ub(!ro/ects s$all be Complied7 given to communities t$at mobilize more t$an ;5 percent of t$e cost of materials7 0sing selection criteria acceptable to t$e Bank: t$e Complied7 ."O referred to in paragrap$ ;5 above s$all identify villages and communities for assistance under t$e !ro/ect: assist Communities in determining t$e re?uired interventions using participatory tec$ni?ues: and organize beneficiaries into multiple(function COs: eac$ $eaded by a trained community mobilizer 1bot$ men and &omen volunteers from &it$in t$e village community27 Women: in particular: s$all be targeted for assistance Complied7 under t$is component t$roug$ t$e formation and strengt$ening of groups of &omen participants 1about F5 percent of t$e total number of COs2 into &omen only and mi+ed COs7 *t least one t$ird of t$e ."O village organizers s$all be &omen7 CWD s$all implement t$e upgrading and improvement of rural roads under t$is !ro/ect Component7 Complied7
)$e !M0 s$all approve t$e selection of all rural roads Complied7 to be upgraded or improved under t$e !ro/ect7 )$e !M0 s$all recruit t$e domestic consultants: referred to in c$edule A to t$is -oan *greement: in consultation &it$ CWD to monitor design standards and to provide construction supervision of rural roads improved under t$e !ro/ect7 )$e construction specification for t$is !ro/ect Complied7 Designs revie&ed component s$all be sufficient to ensure durability and and approved by minimize maintenance re?uirements7 Consultants: CWD: and !M07
4B
*ppendi+ E
Re erence Co#enant "inancial Ser#ices -* c$edule @%: ., ! s$all establis$ t&o field units in eac$ !ro/ect !aragrap$ =B District to implement t$is component of t$e !ro/ect7 -* c$edule @%: !aragrap$ =D
)$e taff of eac$ field unit s$all carry out ocial Complied7 Mobilization and group formation: provide basic training to group members: mobilize savings: and disburse and recover credit form COs7 )$e taff s$all also monitor t$e activities of COs closely to ensure t$at 1a2 t$eir operations are in conformity &it$ t$e procedures agreed upon bet&een COs and ., !: 1b2 credit is utilized productively: and 1c2 records of transactions are properly kept7 ., ! s$all establis$ a revolving fund and allocate Complied7 recovered sub(loan principal amounts into t$e fund7 )$e resources of t$e fund s$all be utilized to finance on(lending for similar purposes to members of COs in t$e !ro/ect area7 )$e COs s$all carry out t$e initial appraisal of Complied7 applications for credit: and t$e ocial Organizers of ., ! s$all furt$er appraise t$e ub(loan proposals7 )$e members of eac$ CO s$all elect a group leader &$o s$all organize meetings and facilities lending and savings transactions7 ub(loans s$all be granted by t$e COs to members in Complied7 accordance &it$ t$e follo&ing guidelinesH 1i2 .o collateral s$all be re?uired for sub(loans: e+cept t$at eac$ sub(loan s$all be guaranteed by four members of t$e COs7 1ii2 ub(loans s$all only be granted to individualsM 1iii2 Eac$ CO member s$all $ave completed a minimum period of savings to become eligible for credit and s$ould continue saving to maintain t$eir eligibility for furt$er sub(loans7 ., ! s$all pay: as appropriate: a t&o percent margin Complied7 ,ecovery rate << of t$e recovered amount to t$e group leaders of t$e percent7 COs as an incentive to recover outstanding sub( loans7
Women: in particular: s$all be targeted for assistance Complied7 Co&ever: =AI of under t$is component of t$e !ro/ect 1about A5 percent t$e credits &ere provided to of t$e credit provided27 &omen: based on demand and eligibility criteria7 Re+lending and On+Lending Terms -* c$edule @%: !un/ab s$all on(lend t$e proceeds of t$e -oan Complied7 )$e !un/ab on( !aragrap$ 44 allocated for !art 'our of t$e !ro/ect in local currency lent t$e loan proceeds to t$e pursuant to a subsidiary loan agreement acceptable to ."O at ;5I: &$ic$ &ere on( t$e Bank7 E+cept as ot$er&ise agreed to by t$e Bank: lent to t$e beneficiaries at t$e on(lending rate s$all not $e less t$an ;E percent per =5I out of &$ic$ =I &as annum7 paid as incentive for recovery to group leaders7
*ppendi+ E
4D
Co#enant Stat!s )$e Borro&er s$all re?uire !un/ab to cause ., ! to .ot yet due7 Co&ever: t$e repay t$e subsidiary loan one year from t$e end of t$e provisions e+ist in t$e -*7 !ro/ect7 Ongoing7 )$e District "overnment $as committed to seek re?uired funding from t$e provincial government7
O'eration and )aintenance -* c$edule @%: CWD s$all be responsible for t$e maintenance of rural !aragrap$ 4A roads improved under !art )$ree of t$e !ro/ect7 CWD s$all carry out t$e O&M of t$e rural roads on its o&n or it s$all use private sector local contractors7 CWD s$all allocate sufficient funds for O&M annually7 %n any event: CWD s$all allocate a minimum of =5:555 ,upees per #ilometer for O&M7 -* c$edule @%: !aragrap$ 4B )$e W0*s s$all be responsible for t$e O&M of t$e Watercourses and ot$er %rrigation %nfrastructure improved under !art One of t$e !ro/ect: &$ile DOWM and D%! s$all be responsible for providing )ec$nical upervision to t$e W0*s7 )$e maintenance of t$e infrastructure improved or constructed under !art )&o of t$e !ro/ect s$all be t$e responsibility of COs t$at contributed to t$eir construction7
Complied7 !rovisions e+ist in t$e memorandum of understandings signed &it$ t$e communities7 Complied7 !rovisions e+ist in t$e memorandum of understandings signed &it$ t$e communities7 Complied7 )$e %BME systems developed and implemented by t$e !M0 itself: &$ic$ &as accepted by t$e *DB7
)onitoring and E#al!ation -* c$edule @%: )$e !M0: &it$ t$e assistance of t$e implementation !aragrap$ 4E and BME consultants: s$all establis$ a BME system to monitor implementation progress of t$e !ro/ect &$ic$ s$all employ a set of indicators acceptable to t$e Bank: and assess t$e impact of t$e !ro/ect on t$e beneficiaries7 )$e BME s$all include t$e estimates of ve$icle cost savings and incremental value(added %nternal ,ate of ,eturn 1E%,,2 estimates for irrigation improvements: Community Developments and ,ural ,oads7
)id+Term Re#ie0 -* c$edule @%: * compre$ensive Midterm ,evie& s$all be conducted Complied7 at t$e end of t$e second year of t$e !ro/ect by t$e Bank !aragrap$ 4< and !DD7 En#ironmental Consideration -* c$edule @%: *dverse environmental impacts s$all be mitigated and !aragrap$ F5 appropriate environmental safeguards adopted in relation to noise: dust: air pollution: safety standards: and sanitation measures as specified by !un/abKs Environment Department7 Complied ( *s specified by t$e !un/abKs Environment Department and t$e ,,!: and included in t$e contract documents: implementation &as monitored by !M0 during construction
4E
*ppendi+ E
Co#enant Stat!s !un/ab s$all furnis$ to t$e Bank all suc$ reports and Complied7 information as t$e Bank s$all reasonably re?uest concerning 1i2 t$e -oan and t$e e+penditure of t$e proceeds t$ereofM 1ii2 t$e goods and services and ot$er items of e+penditure financed out of suc$ proceedsM 1iii2 t$e !ro/ectM 1iv2 t$e administration: operations and financial condition of t$e !un/abM and 1v2 any ot$er matters relating to t$e purposes of t$e -oan7 !un/ab s$all ensure t$at !DD and t$e implementation Complied7 agencies 1i2 maintain separate accounts for t$e !ro/ect and for its overall operationsM 1ii2 $ave suc$ accounts and related financial statements 1balance s$eet: statement of income and e+penses: and related statements2 audited annually: in accordance &it$ appropriate auditing standards consistently applied: by independent auditors &$ose ?ualifications: e+perience and terms of reference are acceptable to t$e BankM and 1iii2 furnis$ to t$e Bank: promptly after t$eir preparation but in any event not later t$an t&elve mont$s after t$e close of t$e fiscal year to &$ic$ t$ey relate: certified copies of suc$ audited accounts and financial statements and t$e report of t$e auditors relating t$ereto 1including t$e auditorsT opinion on t$e use of t$e -oan *greement as &ell as on t$e use of t$e procedures for imprest account and statement of e+penditures2: all in t$e Englis$ language7 !un/ab s$all furnis$ to t$e Bank suc$ furt$er information concerning suc$ accounts and financial statements and t$e audit t$ereof as t$e Bank s$all from time to time reasonably re?uest7
*ppendi+ <
4<
;7 )$e Dera "$azi #$an 1D" #$an2 ,ural Development !ro/ect in t$e sout$&estern !un/ab 1t$e !ro/ect2 began in ;<<D and &as completed in =55D Wit$in t$e pro/ect boundary are t$e districts of D" #$an and ,a/anpur7 )$e main ob/ectives of t$e !ro/ect &ereH 1i2 to reduce poverty by increasing farm productivity and rural incomesM and 1ii2 to improve t$e ?uality of life by increasing access to productive: p$ysical: and social rural infrastructure and rural financial services: and by developing $uman resources and en$ancing skills7 =7 )$e follo&ing post(pro/ect economic evaluation &as made to reestimate t$e anticipated economic returns &it$ t$e use of t$e actual incremental investment costs and net benefit stream incurred and realized during implementation and foreseen after t$e !ro/ect: and to compare t$ese &it$ t$e returns estimated at t$e appraisal stage7 )$e impact of t$e !ro/ect on poverty incidence is also analyzed against t$e assumptions at t$e appraisal stage7 47 )$is economic analysis generally follo&s t$e same approac$ and met$odology t$at &as adopted at t$e appraisal stage in *ugust ;<<D7 )$e present analysis: $o&ever: benefits from t$e data provided in t$e various reports compiled by t$e !un/ab Economic ,esearc$ %nstitute 1!E,%2:;5 and discussions &it$ t$e pro/ect staff: staff of t$e .ational ,ural upport !rogram 1a nongovernment organization contracted to mobilize communities and to provide financial services2: field staff of t$e line agencies: and field observations and interaction during t$e !ro/ect Completion ,evie& 1!C,2 Mission &it$ a large array of direct and indirect beneficiaries at randomly selected community organizations7 E. )et-odolog$ and A''roac-
F7 )$e !ro/ect $ad five main components: namelyH 1i2 irrigation improvement &it$ tube(&ell irrigation and surface irrigation development subcomponentsM 1ii2 community development t$roug$ $ill torrent management: soil and &ater conservation: agriculture production: livestock production: and village community infrastructure improvementM 1iii2 rural road upgradingM 1iv2 financial servicesM and 1v2 institutional support7 A7 )$e !ro/ect &as appraised on t$e basis of its estimated economic viability vis(U(vis t$e economic internal rates of return 1E%,,s2 for t$e irrigation improvement and rural road components7 )$e cost of t$e community development and institutional support components &as e+cluded7 But t$e cost of t$e institutional support component &as considered in estimating t$e overall E%,, for t$e !ro/ect7 )$e selection criterion for t$e community development interventions &as t$e financial viability of t$e community(identified interventions7 B7 'ollo&ing t$e above approac$: t$is analysis reestimated t$e E%,,s for t$e irrigation development and rural road components: as &ell as for t$e overall !ro/ect 1by adding t$e cost of t$e institutional support component27 )$e reestimated E%,,s under different scenarios for t$e !ro/ect are provided at )able *<7;7
;5
Economic *nalysis of @arious Components of Dera "$azi #$an ,ural Development !ro/ect 1parts ; and =2: Marc$ =55BM 0pdating of Baseline urvey of Dera "$azi #$an ,ural Development !ro/ect: 'ebruary =55BM and %mpact Evaluation of Dera "$azi #$an ,ural Development !ro/ect: .ovember =55B7
F5
*ppendi+ <
".
Ass!m'tions
D7 )$e main assumptions used in t$is end(of(pro/ect financial and economic analysis &ere as follo&sH 1i2 Current prices 1=55D2 in !akistan rupees 1!,s2 &ere used for all items in t$e cost and benefit stream by converting prices &it$ t$e use of t$e gross domestic product deflator for t$e respective years7 )$e net cas$ flo& &as converted into current 0 dollars &it$ t$e use of t$e conversion rates for t$e relevant years7 %mport parity and e+port parity prices &ere estimated for t$e traded goods: after ad/usting for ta+es: duties: and any price distortions7 )$e financial and economic prices for various inputs and outputs are presented in )able *<7= &$ile t$e derivations for import and e+port parity prices are summarized in )ables *<74 and *<7F: respectively7 %n estimating import and e+port parity price: a foreign e+c$ange conversion rate of !,sB57A J >; &as assumed: reflecting t$e true opportunity cost of foreign e+c$ange7 * standard conversion factor of 57< &as used for non(traded goods7 )$is &as estimated by t$e standard computation and is in line &it$ current use in appraised pro/ects7 -abor cost &as ad/usted by a factor of 57E to reflect t$e opportunity cost of labor7 Considering t$e current demand for labor: especially in t$e construction industry: and out(migration from t$e rural areas: t$e opportunity cost of labor &as assumed at 57E rat$er t$an 57DA: as traditionally assumed7 'inancial crop budgets &ere prepared for individual crop enterprises and a model farm budget &as constructed for a ; $ectare 1$a2 farm7 )$e gross margins: based on economic prices of inputs and outputs: &ere applied to t$e area t$at &ould be cultivated &it$ t$e $elp of investments in irrigation7 *s tube(&ell irrigation is a recent development in t$e area: &$ic$ &as largely rain( fed or a cultivable &asteland: and given t$e ine+perience of t$e farmers in t$e area in irrigated agriculture: t$e full development stage &as assumed to be attained in B years7 )$e period of analysis &as assumed to be =5 years: t$e same as t$at adopted at appraisal7
1ii2
1iii2
1iv2
1v2
1iv2
1vii2
1viii2
G.
E7 *t appraisal it &as envisaged t$at t$e investment in surface irrigation structures &ouldH 1i2 re$abilitate about B:F;5 $a of land currently receiving irrigation &ater: and 1ii2 provide
*ppendi+ < F; irrigation to an additional =:<;5 $a in t$e command areas of #a$a ultan and @e$o&a7 Co&ever: after a c$ange in scope during implementation t$at e+cluded t$e re$abilitation of main diversion structures: and litigation problems at @e$o&a: t$e surface irrigation improvement &as limited to t$e #a$a ultan command area7 *t completion: an increase of F:EAF $a in cropped area &as noted in #a$a ultan alone: against a total increase in cropped area of =:<;5 $a envisaged at appraisal for t$e #a$a ultan and @e$o&a command areas combined7
<7 One $undred &atercourses 1WCs2: A5 eac$ in t$e @e$ova and #a$a ultan command areas: &ere also to be re$abilitated7 But only ;5 WCs &ere improved in t$e #a$a ultan area largely because of lo& demand: and no WC &as improved in @e$ova because of &ater rig$ts issues7 )$e remaining WCs in #ala ultan are e+pected to be improved under t$e ongoing national WC re$abilitation program: funded by t$e "overnment of !akistan7 ;57 *t completion: t$e total value of production 1net of production cost2 from t$e additional area broug$t under cultivation &as about >;E4:=557 Wit$ t$e improvement in surface irrigation structures: t$e production of sorg$um in t$e area $as increased by about D=5 metric tons 1M)2 yearly: and millet by about EF5 M) yearly7 )$e !ro/ect did not finance any improvement in surface irrigation in areas already receiving &ater: as t$ese activities &ere already under &ay &it$ government funding &$en t$e !ro/ect started7 Cence: t$e AI increase in production in t$e area already receiving irrigation &ater &as not realized under t$e !ro/ect7 ;;7 "ross margins per $ectare of cultivated crops gro&n in t$e #a$a ultan area &$ere surface irrigation supply &as re$abilitated are presented in )able *<7A7 )$e annual increase in gross margin is estimated at >4D7D5: as can be seen from )able *<7B7 *lt$oug$ a target for t$is subcomponent is not specified in t$e pro/ect frame&ork: it $as been subsumed into t$e overall target of a >455 per $ectare increase for t$e irrigation development component7 )$e increase of >4D7D5 in t$e gross margin is reasonable: given t$e lo& cropping intensity due to t$e seasonal variation in t$e &ater source: and t$e lack of demand for &atercourse improvement7 %t &as also e+pected at appraisal t$at $ig$er(production packages &ould be introduced over time in t$e area by t$e agriculture e+tension and researc$ services7 * s$ift to&ard $ig$er(value crops $as only /ust started and a substantial s$ift is e+pected in t$e ne+t =4 years: as marketing systems developed for $ig$(value crops are &ell establis$ed in t$e area and t$e demonstration effect of t$e activities being undertaken in deep turbine tube(&ells 1D)Ws2 is catc$ing on in t$is area 1para7 ;F27 Co&ever: given t$e seasonal variation in &ater availability: t$e investment in t$e s$ift to $ig$(value crops is e+pected to be limited and seasonal 1one crop only27 8. T!be+@ell Irrigation
;=7 *t appraisal it &as assumed t$at by t$e end of t$e !ro/ect about ;55 D)Ws: &it$ a command area of about F5 $ectares eac$: &ould be developed7 Eac$ D)W &as to be /ointly o&ned and managed by a &ater users association 1W0*2: consisting of about ;5;= farmers7 Eac$ developed tube(&ell &as also to be complemented by an improved WC distribution system7 By t$e end of t$e !ro/ect: about ;4D D)Ws $ad been developed and about A:FE5 $a of ne& area $ad been broug$t under cultivation7 Co&ever: only F5 WCs &ere laid according to t$e specified standardsM t$ere are plans to improve t$e rest under t$e ongoing national program 1para7 <27 ;47 'rom t$e crop budgets s$o&n in )able *<7D: and t$e estimated model farm budgets 1)able *<7E2: a total annual value of production 1net of production cost2 of >A7; million from t$e ;4D D)Ws &as estimated7 Eac$ D)W on average contributes about >4D:;<5 &ort$ of
F=
*ppendi+ <
production: given t$e average production of ;45 M) of &$eat valued at >=A:555: AF M) of seed cotton valued at >=4:444: A5 M) of onions valued at >=:5A5: and ;;A M) of fodder valued at >;:<;D7 ;F7 )$ese estimates indicate a yearly gross margin per $ectare of about ><4= on t$e irrigated plains 1tube(&ells2: compared &it$ >455 per $ectare envisaged at appraisal7 )$e significant increase in t$e gross margin estimate is due to 1i2 $ig$er(t$an(e+pected cropping intensities ac$ievedM 1ii2 cultivation of $ig$(value crops suc$ as onionsM 1iii2 availability of loans t$roug$ t$e line of credit supported by t$e !ro/ectM and 1iv2 t$e deregulation policy of t$e government: &$ic$ $as allo&ed farmers to get $ig$er value for t$eir outputs and given t$em an incentive to gro& $ig$(value crops7 7. R!ral Road %'grading
;A7 By t$e end of t$e !ro/ect about 4E< km of rural roads $ad been improved7 During t$e !C, Mission road users reported t$at passenger fares $ad decreased by almost A5I: as envisaged at appraisal7 )$e average passenger fare is t$e same as cartage for a F5 kilogram load7 )$e road users also indicated t$at on average eac$ $ouse$old saves about >=5 in passenger fare and >F5 in cartage yearly7 )$e >B5 saved is almost t$rice t$e estimate at t$e appraisal stage for various reasons: including t$e transfer of a larger s$are of t$e ve$icle operating cost to consumers because of competition in t$e transport sector resulting from t$e liberal leasing facility of t$e banks: a surge in economic activity due to greater(t$an(e+pected tube(&ell development: and &idespread demand for community development infrastructure7 9. Comm!nit$ De#elo'ment
;B7 *t appraisal it &as envisaged t$at t$e communities &ould identify community(based /ointly managed initiatives t$at accorded &it$ t$eir prioritized felt needs: organize t$eir factors of production: undertake income(generating activities: and improve t$eir ?uality of life7 * total of ;:4<E suc$ subpro/ects &ere completed out of more t$an ;D:555 identified to be financially viable7 )$ese completed subpro/ects &ereH 1i2 =5D small irrigation sc$emes suc$ as dug &ells and s$allo& tube(&ellsM 1ii2 4= soil conservation structuresM 1iii2 ;B= small &$eat(flour and multipurpose millsM 1iv2 =;E cattle s$edsM 1v2 ;F= poultry s$edsM 1vi2 ;FB farm(produce &are$ousesM 1vii2 =A sa&mills and multipurpose millsM 1viii2 ;DA drinking &ater sc$emesM 1i+2 ==A community centers: dispensaries: and sc$ool buildingsM 1+2 ;< link roads and street soling pro/ectsM 1+i2 4; culverts and bridgesM and ;B ot$er small sc$emes7 1'or details see )able *<7<27 ;D7 )$e findings of t$e impact assessment report of !E,% support t$e conclusion t$at 1i2 all t$e interventions $ave reasonably $ig$ 'inancial %nternal ,ate of ,eturns 1'%,,s2 ( ranging from =DI to BBIM and 1ii2 t$e community(based sc$emes &ill generate annual income of >;7= million: benefiting about B5:555 $ouse$olds &it$ about F;E:555 people7 1)$e actual number of beneficiary $ouse$olds and population may be less: $o&ever: as about ;5I are benefiting from more t$an one intervention and some double counting may be involved72 Moreover: t$e beneficiaries include bot$ members and nonmembers of t$e community organizations7 ;E7 )$e community development sc$emes $ave increased yearly $ouse$old income by an average of >=; per $ouse$old: &it$ t$e $ig$est increase reported from soil conservation structures: at >4=D per $ouse$old: against >=A estimated for soil conservation measures only: at appraisal7
*ppendi+ <
F4
..
;<7 )$e overall goal of t$e !ro/ect &as to reduce poverty incidence in t$e rain(fed area of t$e D" #$an district: &$ic$ is e+tremely poor compared &it$ ot$er districts of t$e province7 )$e impact evaluation studies carried out by !E,% s$o& t$at pro/ect interventions $ave successfully reduced t$e poverty incidence to about AFI: against B5I anticipated at appraisal7 )$e !C, Mission estimates t$at t$e pro/ect support &ill increase t$e overall per capita annual income by >;47A5: or by about ><A per average $ouse$old7 'or details see )able *<7;57 =57 Discussions &it$ communities suggest t$at t$e en$anced enterprises and t$e farm and nonfarm activities $ave increased t$e demand for bot$ permanent and casual or seasonal labor7 During construction: t$e !ro/ect generated employment of about F:DF5 person(years: compared &it$ ;:555 person(years anticipated at appraisal: producing income of !,s4BB million 1>B million27 =;7 *fter t$e !ro/ect: t$e annual demand for additional labor is e+pected to be about =:;;= person(years7 Of t$is total: <55 person(years &ould be seasonal labor for farm productionM 4<5 person(years: unskilled labor for road maintenanceM and about =<5 person(years for t$e management of t$e community(based infrastructure: especially small &$eat(flour mills: sa&mills: community irrigation sc$emes: etc7 )$e additional employment &ould $ave a total annual value of about >4 million7 ==7 )$e !C, Mission also noted t$at most of t$e interventions: by virtue of t$eir multiplier effect: &ould generate additional rural nonfarm activities and furt$er reduce poverty7 %n addition: according to t$e impact evaluation study of !E,%: more t$an ;A:555 formerly unemployed persons $ave received skills training and are contributing about >A7A million yearly7 I. Economic Anal$sis
=47 'or t$e reevaluation of t$e !ro/ect interventions: t$e met$odology adopted at appraisal &as largely follo&ed7 *t appraisal: t$e E%,, &as estimated for t$e irrigation improvement and rural roads components: but not for t$e community development: financial services: and institutional support components7 )$e E%,,s estimated at appraisal and at completion &ere as follo&s7 4. S!r ace Irrigation
=F7 )$e present end(of(pro/ect analysis suggests an estimated E%,, of ==7EI for t$e surface irrigation component: against t$e appraisal estimate of F475I7 )$e difference is mainly due to t$e c$ange in scope and t$e e+clusion of t$e re$abilitation of irrigation structures in t$e $ead reac$: and t$e lack of interest of t$e community in WC development 1)able *<7;;27 8. Dee' T!be+@ell Irrigation
=A7 )$e E%,, for t$e deep turbine tube(&ells &as estimated at 4<75I at t$e design stage7 )$e end(of(pro/ect estimate is AD7EI: largely because $ig$er cropping intensity and yields &ere ac$ieved t$an &ere assumed at t$e design stage7 )$e investment is still viable: at ;=I: even if t$e costs &ere to go up by ;55I or t$e benefits to decrease by $alf 1)able *<7;=27 )$e combined E%,,s for t$e t&o irrigation subcomponents &ere estimated at F;I at t$e appraisal stage: and at ABI at completion7
FF
*ppendi+ <
7.
Roads
=B7 )$e reestimated E%,, for t$e roads component is 4B7<I: about 4 percentage points $ig$er t$an t$e appraisal estimate 1)able *<7;427 9. Total Pro&ect Viabilit$
=D7 )$e estimated E%,, for t$e !ro/ect: considering t$e costs and benefits of t$e irrigation and roads components and t$e cost of t$e institutional strengt$ening component: is 447AI: against =F75I estimated at appraisal 1)able *<7;F27
Table A>.43 S!mmar$ Base EIRRs and S0itc-ing Val!es :D; PCR A''raisal
Percentage Decrease in Bene its or EIRR o 48D AB75 AA75 AD75 B475
)otal !ro/ect Cost 447A =47B D575 F;75 E%,, J economic internal rate of return7 a %ncludes irrigation: roads: and institutional strengt$ening components7
ourceH pro/ect completion revie& mission7
*ppendi+ <
FA
Table A.>.83 "inancial and Economic Costs o In'!ts and O!t'!ts "inancial Cost Economic Cost Item %nit :PRs; :PRs; Cro's W$eat kgs ;5755 <7AE W$eat byproduct kgs ;7A5 ;74A W$eat seed kgs ;=755 ;;7A5 Oil seeds kgs ;B7EE ;A7;< Oil seeds seed kgs =57=A ;E7=4 ,abi fodder kgs ;755 57<5 ,abi fodder seed kgs DA755 BD7A5 Cotton kgs =A755 =E7F; Cotton seed kgs A5755 AB7E= !addy kgs D7BA E7AD !addy seed kgs <7;E ;57=< !addy byproduct kgs 57D5 57B4 ugarcane kgs ;7A5 ;755 ugarcane seed kgs ;7E5 ;7B= ugarcane fodder kgs ;755 57<5 org$um kgs ;F7D4 ;47=A org$um buproduct kgs ;755 57<5 orgum seed kgs ;E7F; ;B7AD Millets kgs ;A755 ;47A5 Millet byproduct kgs ;755 57<5 Millet seed kgs ;E7DA ;B7EE #$arif fodders kgs ;755 57<5 #$arif fodder seed kgs =F755 =;7B5 @egetables kgs ;755 57<5 @egetable seed kgs A55755 FA5755 Melons kgs ;755 57<5 Melon seed kgs E5755 D=755 Onion kgs =7A5 =7=A Onion seed kgs =F755 =;7B5 "uar kgs ;755 57<5 "uar seed kgs ;755 57<5 )ractor plo&ing !er irrigation cost 0rea D*! !esticide $rs ; bag bag !,s7 455755 F<F755 DA5755 ;:=55755 ;:555755 ;A5755 ;=5755 =A5755 =<B7F5 ;:=5=74< ;:A=E7;F ;:;55755 ;=5755 <B755
-abor 1male2 day labor 1'emale2 day D*!H Di(*monium !$osp$ate kgsH #ilograms ourcesH !C, mission estimates
FB
*ppendi+ <
Table A>.7 Im'ort Parit$ Prices :S!garcane/ %rea/ DAP/ Potas-; %rea S!garcane Et$ Amo!nt Et$ Amo!nt
a b
"ertili*ers c DAP
Potas-
Descri'tion %nit Amo!nt Amo!nt Commodit$ Price !rice in international market > t =45 ; 4;E F=; ;DD 'reig$t and insurance 1W2 > t FA ; F5 F5 F5 C%' at #arac$i port > t =DA ; 4AE FB; =;D C%'at #arac$i port !,s7 t ;B:B4E ; =;:BA< =D:EB5 ;4:;== Economic Prices !ort c$arges 1W2 !,s7 t F45 ; F45 F45 F45 -osses at port 1W2 percent ; ;BB = F44 AAD =B= W$olesalers margin 1W2 percent A EB= 4 BDB EBA F;F )ransport c$arges from port to !ro/ect area 1W2 !,s7 t DA5 ; DA5 DA5 DA5 W$olesale market value !,s7 t ;E:EFB ; =4:<FE 45:FB4 ;F:<D< !rocessing cost 1(2 !,s7 t F:=55 ; @alue of ra& material at millgate !,s7 t D:E<= ; )onnage of sugarcane re?uired 1at DI recovery rate2 kg ; AA= ; @alue of sugarcane at millgate !,s7 t ;:;5A ; )ransport c$arges to millgateLfrom &$olesale market 1(2 !,s7 ; ;55 ; ;55 ;55 ;55 %mport parity price at farmgate !,s7 ; ;:55A ; =F:5FE 45:AB4 ;A:5D< *ctual farmgate price !,s7 ; ;:A55 ; ;A:555 =F:555 ;E:555 aH ugar 1World2: %nternational ugar *greement daily price: ra&: fob: and sto&ed at greater Caribbean ports7)$e World Bank Commodity !rice Data !ink $eet ( Marc$ =55D bH 0rea: Black ea: bagged: spot: ibid cH D*! 1diamonium p$osp$ate2: standard size: bulk: spot: fob: 0 "ulf: ibid dH !otasium c$loride 1muirate of potas$: standard grade: spot: fob @ancouver: ibid C%'HCost %nsurance on 'reig$t: >H 0nited tates Dollars: tH metric tons: kgH kilograms: !,sH !akistani ,upees ourcesH !C, mission estimates and as provided above
Table A>.9 E1'ort Parit$ Prices Descri'tion Commodity price !rice in international market Quality ad/ustment factor 'reig$t and insurance 'OB at #arac$i port %nit > percent > > Padd$a @-eatb Et$ Amo!nt Et$ Amo!nt t E= t 4=4 =BF 5 t <A t Cottonc Et$ Amo!nt ;:=E< ;:;5F 5
;<< t ;E< EB 5 t
t =BF t ;E< t ;:;5F 'OB at #arac$i port !,s7 t ;A:<<< t ;;:FF4 t BB:D<F Economic prices !ort c$arges 1(2 !,s7 t F45 t F45 ; F45 -osses at port 1(2 percent = 4=5 = < ; F W$olesalers margin 1(2 percent A E55 A AD= A 4:4F5 )ransport c$arges from pro/ect area to port 1(2 !,s7 t DA5 t DA5 t DA5 E+millL&$olesale market value !,s7 t ;4:B<< t <:BE4 t B=:=D5 @alue of paddyLseed cotton percent BB <:5F= 44 =5:AF< @alue of byproduct 1W2 !,s7 t FA= t E:<;5 Milling cost 1(2 !,s7 t E=5 t <A5 @alue at &$olesale marketLmillgate !,s7 t E:BDF t <:BE4 t =E:A5< )ransport c$arges farm to &$olesale market mill gate 1(2 !,s7 t ;55 t ;55 t ;55 E+port parity price at farmgate !,s7 t E:ADF t <:AE4 t =E:F5< *ctual farmgate price !,s7 t D:BA5 t ;5:555 t =A:555 aH )$ai: AI broken: W,: milled indicative price based on &eekly surveys of e+port transactions 1indicative survey price2: government %ncludes value of broken rice 1;;I2: tips 1AI2: and $usk 1=FI2: )$e World Bank Commodity !rice Data !ink $eet ( Marc$ =55D bH W$eat 0 : C,W: ibid c Cotton * %nde+ .e& Definition: ibid 'OBH'ree on board: >H 0nited tates Dollars: tH metric tons: kgH kilograms: !,sH !akistani ,upees ourcesH !C, mission estimates and as provided above
*ppendi+ <
FD
Table A>.6 Enter'rise B!dgets :"inancial Prices; or 2a-a S!ltan Item P-$sical E!antities Main Crop 1kg2 By !roduct 1kg2 In'!ts )ractor !lo&ing 1$rs2 eed 1kg2 0rea 1bag2 D*! 1kg2 ulfate of !otas$ 1kg2 !esticides Cost 1factor2 -abor 1days2 .umber of irrigations "inancial Val!es Re#en!e :PRs; Main !roduct Byproduct Gross Income :PRs; Costs :PRs; )ractor eed 0rea D*! ulfate of !otas$ !esticides Cost )$res$er or s$elling cost -abor %rrigation Ot$er Costs 1;5I of above2 Total Cas- Cost :PRs; Gross )argins :PRs;
$rsH $ours: kgH kilograms: !,sH !akistani ,upees and D*!H diamonium p$osp$ate ourcesH !C, mission estimates Sorg-!m )illet
;=
;=
FE
*ppendi+ <
Table A>.< One .a )odel "arm B!dgets :"inancial Prices; or 2a-a S!ltan Descri'tion !ercentage in Cropped *rea *rea )ain O!t'!t Main crop 1kg2 Byproduct 1kg2 In'!ts )ractor plo&ing 1$rs2 eed 1kg2 0rea 1bag2 D*! 1kg2 ulfate of potas$ 1kg2 !esticides cost 1factor2 -abor 1days2 .umber of %rrigations Descri'tion Re#en!e :PRs; Main !roduct Byproduct Gross Income :PRs; Costs :PRs; )ractor eed 0rea D*! ulfate of !otas$ !esticides Cost )$res$erL $elling Cost -abor %rrigation Ot$er Costs 1;5I of above2 Total Cas- Cost :PRs; Gross )argins :PRs;
$rsH $ours: kgH kilograms: !,sH !akistani ,upees and D*!H diamonium p$osp$ate ourcesH !C, mission estimates
*ppendi+ <
F<
Table A>.A O!t'!ts and In'!ts o Dee' T!rbine T!be+0ells Per .a E!antit$ o O!t'!ts And In'!ts Descri'tion )ain O!t'!t Main Crop 1kg2 By !roduct 1kg2 In'!ts )ractor !lo&ing 1$rs2 eed 1kg2 0rea 1bag2 D*! 1kg2 ulfate of !otas$ 1kg2 !esticides Cost 1factor2 -abor 1days2 .umber of %rrigations Re#en!e :PRs; Main !roduct Byproduct Gross Income :PRs; Costs :PRs; )ractor eed 0rea D*! ulfate of !otas$ !esticides Cost )$res$erL $elling cost -abor %rrigation Ot$er Costs 1;5I of above2 Total Cas- Cost :PRs; Gross )argins :PRs; ;:555 =:4EB =:D=D =:<BF ;:EED 85/A<5 4=/97> =:A;D F:FFB ;:4B4 49/>>< 45/4A> B:DBE A:F4F =:=EA 86/474 98/69A =:B5F ;:FE= EDD >/<68 4>/7>< ;:<=D F<F BFE A/486 49/789 ;:4D< ;:<DB <;E 45/5>A 7/<=> B:;AA F:FFB A:;AF 6</<>6 9/=6A =:555 ;:555 4:D5A ;:F=4 =:A<F =:5DA =:<BF ;:EA4 ;:EA4 F:FFB <5= <=B =:4D; ;:<=D <5< ;:EA4 ;:<=D =DE ;:EA4 =:<BF ;:55E ;:EA4 B:BB< =E:FAF ;:EA4 =:<BF 4F:5EB A:;;4 7>/4>> 86/4A9 <A/<A= =A:;DF BD:BDE =B:5F; 4:55B 8>/59= ;<:=BB =:;E4 84/99> 47/A=< <4/668 ;4:DEB B;:AA= B < ;; 4 ; F < Val!e o O!t'!ts and In'!ts ; = ; ;= ;;< 4 = ;5 =A = ;A ;E ; = B F< = B ;A = ;5 F= = == ;:;EB = = 4:F5< 4:F5< =A:;DF ( =:D5D ( ;:DB< 4:55B ;:=EF =:;E4 ;4:DEB ( =F:B=; (
@-eat Rabi "odder Cotton Sorg-!m )illet 2-ari "odder Onion
D*!H diamonium p$osp$ate: >H 0nited tates Dollars: tH metric tons: kgH kilograms: !,sH !akistani ,upees ourcesH !C, mission estimates
A5
*ppendi+ <
Table A>.= B!dgets :"inancial Prices; or 95 .a Bloc( "arm Irrigated B$ DT T!be0ell Descri'tion !ercentage in cropped area *rea )ain O!t'!t Main Crop 1kg2 By !roduct 1kg2 In'!ts )ractor !lo&ing 1$rs2 eed 1kg2 0rea 1bag2 D*! 1kg2 ulfate of !otas$ 1kg2 !esticides Cost 1factor2 -abor 1days2 .umber of %rrigations Descri'tion Re#en!e :PRs; Main !roduct Byproduct Gross Income :PRs; Costs :PRs; )ractor eed 0rea D*! ulfate of !otas$ !esticides Cost )$res$erL $elling Cost -abor %rrigation Ot$er Costs 1;5I of above2 Total Cas- Cost :PRs; Gross )argins :PRs; >A5/946 8/869/4=9 ;;=:B4= FE:FEE 677/7<> >6</4=> ;D:DEF F:FFB 9=/>5< 64/A>4 ;5E:BE5 =E:;AE 75>/A7= 4/597/=88 =:<BF ;:=4F 47/6A6 99/684 ;:<DB ;:E=5 85/589 <6/AA9 ;:<DB DE5 =/6=5 6/856 E:E<= 4:=<4 7</887 =</==8 ;F5:D<5 AF:5B4 <E:AA4 DE:EF= ;;:EAB D:F;5 D:F;5 EE:<=5 ;E:54; ;E:A=A FD:F=F 4:EA4 ;:E;< 4:D5A D:D5B ;:;;= D:F;5 =:<BF ;:55E ;:EA4 ;4:44E ;:5BD 4:D5A A:<=E 7/889/6>> ;:=<A:=BE ;<F:=<5 4/9=>/66= ;55:B<D ( 455/<>A 4/767/6<5 ;:4A4:AB5 A=:5E4 B:5;4 6=/5>< DD:5BF E:D4F =6/A>= 47/A=< 487/456 ;4:DEB ;=4:;5A ==E 4B ==5 B F F ;E Val!e o O!t'!ts and In'!ts ( 4E F5 = FB< F:A5A ;4; BB F5 << ;5 =<B 4B; =A F5 ;4 << A =B A< ;5 ;5 F= = FF =:4D; A A ;=<:A=D ;=<:A=D ;55:B<D AF:;F= 4:A4D B:5;4 A:;4E E:D4F ;4:DEB F<:=F= E!antit$ o O!t'!ts and In'!ts @it- Pro&ect Per -a
Total @-eat Oilseeds Rabi "odder Cotton Sorg-!m )illet 2-ari "odder Onion
;7DE D;755
57<A 4E755
5755 5755
57;5 F755
57A5 =5755
575A =755
57;5 F755
5754 ;755
575A =755
D*!H diamonium p$osp$ate: >H 0nited tates Dollars: tH metric tons: kgH kilograms: !,sH !akistani ,upees ourcesH !C, mission estimates
*ppendi+ <
A;
Table A>.> Table A>.>3 "inancial Im'act o Comm!nit$+based Sc-eme Per Ann!al Total Ann!al Income Ca'ita N!mber Income rom All A#erage Total o Per N!mber N!mber o N!mber o Sc-emes Income Per Ann!al No o )ype of c$eme mall scale %rrigation oil conservation structures W$eat flour mills Cattle s$eds !oultry s$eds Ware$ouses a& mills Drinking &ater sc$emes Community $alls -ink roads Culverts and bridges Ot$ers Total Weig$ted average o .. Per Bene iciaries .o!se-olds Per Sc-eme 4A5 D5 FDB ;44 F=5 ;F5 F=5 FF; ;F5 FDB EDA ;F5 9/5=4 =<< Persons Sc-eme :!,s2 DA:B55 ;<D:<4; DD:;;= =<:4<4 B4:555 4B:5F5 ;5:A55 <A:=AB ;5:555 <:A=5 =B:=A5 ;5:555 A4:<AF 1!,s7 million2 ;A7BA B744 ;=7F< B7F; E7<A A7=B 57=B ;B7BD =7=A 57;E 57E; 57;B A6.9 .o!se-old 1!,s2 ;:A;= ;<:D<4 ;:;4F ;:AFD ;:5A5 ;:E5= ;DA ;:A;= A55 ;F5 =;5 A55 ;:=B= Income 1!,s2 =;B =:E=E ;B= ==; ;A5 =AD =A =;B D; =5 45 D; ;E5 "IRR at "IRR at Sc-emes Sc-eme =5D A5 4= ;5 ;B= BE =;E ;< ;F= B5 ;FB =5 =A B5 ;DA B4 ==A =5 ;< BE 4; ;=A ;B =5 4/7>= 6=7 F4 Bene ited Bene ited ;5:4A5 D=:FA5 4=5 =:=F5 ;;:5;B DD:;;= F:;F= =E:<<F E:A=5 A<:BF5 =:<=5 =5:FF5 ;:A55 ;5:A55 ;;:5=A DD:;DA F:A55 4;:A55 ;:=<= <:5FF 4:EDA =D:;=A 4=5 =:=F5 6>/A=5 94=/9<5 PCR A''raisal ADI FFI FBI B;I FEI A5I D;I =DI F=I BBI ABI D=I D5I
!C,H !ro/ect Completion ,evie&: '%,,H 'inancial %nternal ,ate of ,eturn: and !,sH !akistani ,upees ourcesH !C, mission estimates
Table A>.45 Com'onent?S!bcom'onent @ise 'er .. and 'er Ca'ita Income Total Po'!lation Per o .o!se-old N!mber o Per ca'ita Income Bene iting Income Bene iting Income 1!,s .o!se-old :!,s2 million2 ComponentL ubcomponent :CC2 :!,s72 #a$a ultan urface %rrigation 575 FEB 4:F5; 5 5 Deep )ube(&ell Development 45E7E ;:4D5 <:A<5 ==A:F;E 4=:=54 ,oads BBE7B ;EA:D;F ;:455:555 4:B55 A;F Community Development c$emes DA7F A<:DE5 F4D:FA4 ;:=B= ;D= kill training 44575 ;A:555 ;A:555 ==:555 ==:555 A#erage All Combined 4/567 4=6/A49 4/755/555 6/<<> =45 CCH Cose$old and !,sH !akistani ,upees ourcesH !C, mission estimates
A=
*ppendi+ <
Table A>.44 Economic Internal Rate o Ret!rn o S!r ace Irrigation o 2a-a S!ltan Ad&!sted Economic In#estment Costs 1Million ,upees ( Constant !rices2 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 =47FD F754 ;7=5 ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= =7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;= ;7;=
Gross )argin or Additional C!lti#ated Incremental General Additional Area 1!,s7 Bene it 1!,s7 Price Million2 in Inde1 C!lti#ated million2 in Cear 855A Prices 855A Prices De lator Ending Area 1$a2 ;:<<< =:555 =:55; =:55= =:554 =:55F =:55A =:55B =:55D =:55E =:55< =:5;5 =:5;; =:5;= =:5;4 =:5;F =:5;A =:5;B =:5;D =:5;E =:5;< =:5=5 =:5=; =:5== =:5=4 =:5=F =:5=A =:5;E EIRR 5 5 5 5 5 5 ;:FAD =:<;A F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE F:EAE ;B7; ;B7; ;B7; ;B7; ;B7; ;B7; ;E7< =;7B =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 =A74 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 =7DF A7FE <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F <7;F 57BF 57BA 57B< 57D5 57DF 57E5 57EB 57<4 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755 ;755
B?P2R Parit$ A;7B5 A47F5 BF755 A<7A5 AE7A5 AD7B5 A<7<5 B5755 B5755 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5 B57A5
Ad&!sted Cost/ Bene its/ and Incremental Cas- "lo0 in 855A Prices 1> million2 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 575A 575< 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 57;A 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 57F; 575D 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 5754 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 575= 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 (57F; (575= 575D 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;= 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 57;4 88.=D
E%,,H Economic %nternal ,ate of ,eturn: CCH Cose$old and !,sH !akistani ,upees ourcesH !C, mission estimates
*ppendi+ <
A4
AF
*ppendi+ <
*ppendi+ <
AA
Table A>.49 Combined Economic Internal Rate o Ret!rn o t-e Irrigation/ R!ral Roads/ and Instit!tional Strengt-ening Com'onents :B million; Ad&!sted Instit!tional Strengt-ening Total Pro&ect Total Pro&ect Cost 1in =55D Cear !rices2 Cost Toal Bene its Cas- "lo0 ;<<< =555 =55; =55= =554 =55F =55A =55B =55D =55E =55< =5;5 =5;; =5;= =5;4 =5;F =5;A =5;B =5;D =5;E 574; 57FA 57;< 574E 57A5 57A= 57E5 57DE 574< 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 5755 574; 57EB 57FD 57DA ;75E =7BB A7;; ;=7;5 47B; 57=5 57=5 57=5 57=5 57=5 57=5 57== 57=5 57=5 57=5 57=5 5755 575F 57;5 57=A 57F< ;7;D =7F5 A7=D D7A; E7F< <7F; ;5744 ;;7;A ;;7DE ;=75< ;=7F= ;=7DB ;47;= ;47A5 ;47<5 (574; (57E4 (574B (57A; (57A< (;7F< (=7D; (B7E4 47<5 E7=< <7=; ;57;4 ;57<A ;;7AD ;;7EE ;=7=5 ;=7AB ;=7<= ;4745 ;47D5
EIRR 77.6D E%,,H Economic %nternal ,ate of ,eturn: CCH Cose$old and !,sH !akistani ,upees ourcesH !C, mission estimates