Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

General socio-political attitude of 20.

century has gathered around the notion of social engineering with thoughts/actions whatever mental infrastructure and arguments rely on. During the social design and diktat that have underlied thought of all visi le/hidden power owners! pu lic space has attracted attentions as fre"uently used meta. #ocial engineering practices that have focused on especially socio/spatial segregations have een seen in different scaled reflections thatre $ondons green places in which only paid entrences are permitted! for idden-to-negro enches in #outh %frica! totally isolated living conditions from the citylife in &ruitt-'goe/(hicago. )hat eras main stream city planning criteria was the ur an *oning such as housing region or industrial region that have also included minimi*ed interaction and relation with each other. 'ts not re"uired to e oracle for forecasting the appearing regions thatre distinctive tensioned and living in decomposed time period from each other in cities and as a result of this! facilitating the designed interventions into spaces have titled as pro lematic. +hen the pro a le right ac"uisition has egun to appear thanks to social resistance! power has always used the pretending trump. )his course of action has appeared in pu lic spaces with the most legi le way limiting , y presenting directed-discovering potentials to the user- the users perceptions related with space and memories a out space which are encouraging the disconnection etween entry fee and free activity areas and classificator designing of the cultural activity types. 'f .oucaults /etwork #ociety notions are chased to understand the current situation! as a result of followed policies in modern metropolis stage! post-industrial megalopolicies thatre changea le in itself ,slums-later remissioned slums/apartments-gated communities that raised under the title of ur an transformation ,seperated as a su sampleregion- in 0eytin urnu/1erter

ut totally-closed to interaction and penetration with distinctive usage components have remained. &u lic space is one of the most important commons that can remove e2isting interactivelessness with its own structure instead of eing one of the deep segregations tools in post-civil society! moreover3 has gained this "ualification y eing a heterotopologically defined third place that can reali*e physical/perceptual hy ridi*ation of getting-unspaced regions

y losing their perception/memory censors in time! without passivi*ation itself. .oucaults these sentences can e2istence4 e interpreted clearly as the reason of third places

,there- were the places ,where- things found themselves places eacuse ,they- had een violently displaced and then! on the contrary! places ,where- things found their emplacement and natural rest. .oucault56 / 7n 7ther #paces 8eterotopological pu lic space! after analy*ing sociological/spatial inputs of touched and related-peripheral districts with also defining self e2istence! reaks homogeni*ation of district! furthermore3 affirms circulational/perceptional integration ,can e clearly seperated from others as unit-physically- with other third spaces of local network. #harp difference etween common and private spaces in classical pu lic space description! totally removes ,private spaces also get the pu lic passage/corridor "ualification to reach the common spaces- at third space. %s a result of evaluation data! third space is a heterotopia that is opposea le/changea le in itself and intersects the daily life with its own organi*ational system that rises from self-natural dynamics in operational systematic and allows hy ridi*ied e2istence/occurance scenarios.

20. y9*y:l:n sosyo-politik genel tutumu! d9;9nsel altyap:s: ve arg9manlar: hangi temele dayan:rsa dayans:n d9;9nsel/eylemsel olarak toplum m9hendisli<i kavram:nda topland:. )9m g=r9n9r/gi*li iktidar sahiplerinin hayallerinin temelini olu;turan toplum di*ayn: ve diktas: esnas:nda! kamusal alan kavram: s:kl:kla kullan:lan meta olarak dikkat >ekti. ?ngilterede paras:n: veremeyenlerin soluklanamayaca<: ye;il alanlar! G9ney %frikada siyahilerin oturamayaca<: anklar! &ruitt-'goede /(hicago ;ehirden tamam:yla i*ole ya;am s9rme ;eklinde farkl: =l>eklerde yans:malar:n: i*ledi<imi* toplum m9hendisli<i uygulamalar:n: sosyal/mekansal ayr:;t:rma =*elinde yo<unla;t:rd:. @entleri ir irleriyle ili;kisi ve etkile;imi a*al d9*eye indirilecek i>imde konut-sanayi gi i =lgelemelere , a*en sosyal konutlar:n kentin genel ar:nma alan:ndan u*akta in;as: gi i =lgeleme i>i =lgelemeler- =lmek de d=nemin kent planlamas:n:n ana ak:m:n: olu;turdu. Aunun sonucu olarak kentlerde farkl: gerilimlerde ve ir irinden ayr:;an *aman dilimlerinde ya;ayan =lgelerin olu;mas: ve sorunlu g=r9len alanlara tasarlanm:; m9dahalenin kolayla;mas:n: tahmin ede ilmek i>in kahin olmaya gerek yok. Genellikle toplumsal diren> sonucunda ufukta muhtemel hak edinimi g=r9ld9<9nde ise iktidarlar:n ko*u Bm:; gi i yapmak oldu. Au davran:; i>iminin de en

okuna ilir i>imde te*ah9r etti<i yerler! ,9cretsi*/9cretli aktivite alanlar:n: ir irinden ay:racak! k9lt9rel aktiviteleri kendi i>inde s:n:fland:racak ;ekilde tasarlama anlay:;:n: enimseterek kullan:c:lar:n mekanla ilgili alg:lar:n:n! mekana dair elleklerinin! y=nlendirilerek ke;fede ildi<i kadar:yla s:n:rl: kalmas:- yine kamusal mekanlard:. .oucaultun /etwork #ociety kavramlar: 9*erinden gidersek modern metropolis a;amas:nda i*lenen u politikalar neticesinde elimi*de ancak kendi i>inde de<i;ken ,0eytin urnu =rne<inde gecekondu-sonradan imarla;t:r:lan gecekondu/apartman-kentsel d=n9;9m kisvesi alt:nda yay:lan kapal: siteler ,kendinden ayr:;an alt =lge-- farkl: kullan:m ile;enlerinin n9fu*una ve etkile;imine katiyen kapal: post-end9stri megalopolisleri kald:. &ost-sivil toplumda kamusal mekan u derin ayr:;t:rman:n arac: olmak yerine var olan etkile;imsi*li<i kendi yap:s:yla gidere ilecek en =nemli m9;tereklerden iridir. Au niteli<ini alg:/ ellek duyarga>lar:n: *amanla yitirerek mekans:*la;an =lgeleri! kendi varl:<:n: pasifi*e etmeden fi*iksel/alg:sal olarak hi ritle;tirecek! heterotopoloCik tan:mlanm:; ir 9>9nc9l mekan =*elli<iyle sa<lar. D>9nc9l mekan:n varolu; se e ini yine .oucaultun ;u s=*leri a>:k>a anlat:r4 ,there- were the places ,where- things found themselves placed ecause ,they- had een violently displaced and then! on the contrary! places ,where- things found their emplacement and natural rest. .oucault 56 / 7n 7ther #paces 8eterotopoloCik kamusal mekan! dokundu<u =lgelerin ve >evre =lgelerin sosyoloCik/mekansal girdilerini anali* edip kendi varl:<:n: tan:mlama neticesinde ulundu<u =lgenin homoCenli<ini o*makla irlikte! =lgesel a<a dahil di<er 9>9nc9l mekanlarla dola;:msal/alg:sal entegrasyonunu , irim-fi*iksel olarak di<erlerinden net i>imde ayr:la ilirda olumlar. @lasik kamusal alan tan:mlamalar:ndaki m9;terek ve =*el alanlar aras:ndaki keskin ayr:m da ,=*el alanlar:n m9;terek alanlara ula;may: sa<layacak kamusal pasaC/koridor niteli<ini de ka*anmas:yla- 9>9nc9l mekanda tamam:yla ortadan kalkar. D>9nc9l mekan! de<erlendirme verileri neticesinde kendi i>inde kar;:tla;a ilen/farkl:la;an! i;leyi; sistemati<inde g9nl9k hayat: yine kendi do<al dinamiklerinden do<an organi*asyonel yap:s:yla kesen! hi ritle;mi; var olma/ ulunma senaryolar:na imkan tan:yan ir heterotopyad:r.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen