SYNTAX TO RUN CANONICAL CORRELATION:

DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1. FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=locusofcontrol selfconcept motivation read write math science female /FORMAT=NOTABLE /STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE RANGE MINIMUM MAXIMUM SEMEAN MEAN MEDIAN MODE SUM SKEWNESS SESKEW KURTOSIS SEKURT /HISTOGRAM /ORDER=ANALYSIS. CORRELATIONS /VARIABLES=locusofcontrol selfconcept motivation read write math science female /PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG /MISSING=PAIRWISE. MANOVA locusofcontrol selfconcept motivation WITH read write math science female /DISCRIM ALL ALPHA(1) /PRINT=SIG(EIGEN DIM) CANCORR SET1=locusofcontrol selfconcept motivation /SET2=read write math science female

MONIQUE
Statistics locus of control N Valid Missing Mean Std. Error of Mean Median Mode Std. Deviation Variance Skewness Std. Error of Skewness Kurtosis Std. Error of Kurtosis Range Minimum Maximum Sum 600 0 .0965 .02736 .2100 .06
a

self-concept 600 0 .0049 .02880 .0300 .03 .70551 .498 -.895 .100 1.560 .199 3.81 -2.62 1.19 2.95

motivation 600 0 .6608 .01399 .6700 1.00 .34273 .117 -.591 .100 -.885 .199 1.00 .00 1.00 396.50

reading score 600 0 51.9018 .41245 52.1000 52.10 10.10298 102.070 .127 .100 -.758 .199 47.70 28.30 76.00 31141.10

writing score 600 0 52.3848 .39708 54.1000 59.30 9.72645 94.604 -.472 .100 -.702 .199 41.60 25.50 67.10 31430.90

math score 600 0 51.8490 .38435 51.3000 55.50 9.41474 88.637 .264 .100 -.641 .199 43.70 31.80 75.50 31109.40

science score 600 0 51.7633 .39625 52.6000 60.70 9.70618 94.210 -.160 .100 -.690 .199 48.20 26.00 74.20 31058.00

female 600 0 .5450 .02035 1.0000 1.00 .49839 .248 -.181 .100 -1.974 .199 1.00 .00 1.00 327.00

.67028 .449 -.611 .100 .329 .199 3.59 -2.23 1.36 57.92

a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown

Correlations locus of control self-concept motivation reading score writing score math score science score female locus of control Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N self-concept Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N motivation Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N reading score Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N writing score Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N math score Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N science score Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N female Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N 600 .171
**

.171

**

.245

**

.374

**

.359

**

.337

**

.325

**

.113

**

.000 600 1

.000 600 .289

**

.000 600 .061 .138 600 .211

**

.000 600 .019 .634 600 .254

**

.000 600 .054 .190 600 .195

**

.000 600

.005 600
**

.070 -.126 .087 600 .116

**

.000 600 .245

**

.000 600 .289

**

.002 600 .098

*

600 1

.000 600 .374

**

.000 600 .061 .138 600 .019 .634 600 .054 .190 600 .070 .087 600 -.126
**

.000 600 .211

**

.000 600 .629

**

.000 600 .679

**

.005 600 .691

**

.016 600 -.042 .307 600 .244

**

600 1

.000 600 .359

**

.000 600 .254

**

.000 600 .629

**

.000 600 .633

**

.000 600 .569

**

600 1

.000 600 .337

**

.000 600 .195

**

.000 600 .679

**

.000 600 .633

**

.000 600 .650

**

.000 600 -.048 .238 600

**

600 1

.000 600 .325

**

.000 600 .116

**

.000 600 .691

**

.000 600 .569

**

.000 600 .650

**

600

1 -.138

.000 600 .113

**

.005 600 .098

*

.000 600 -.042 .307 600

.000 600 .244

**

.000 600 -.048 .238 600 600 -.138

**

.001 600 1

.005 600

.002 600

.016 600

.000 600

.001 600 600

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

ALEX
MATRIX Run MATRIX procedure: Correlations for Set-1 locusofc selfconc motivati locusofc 1.0000 .1712 .2451 selfconc .1712 1.0000 .2886 motivati .2451 .2886 1.0000

Correlations for Set-2 read write read 1.0000 .6286 write .6286 1.0000 math .6793 .6327 science .6907 .5691 female -.0417 .2443

math science .6793 .6907 .6327 .5691 1.0000 .6495 .6495 1.0000 -.0482 -.1382 and Set-2 math science .3373 .3246 .0536 .0698 .1950 .1157

female -.0417 .2443 -.0482 -.1382 1.0000

Correlations Between Set-1 read write locusofc .3736 .3589 selfconc .0607 .0194 motivati .2106 .2542 Canonical Correlations 1 .464 2 .168 3 .104

female .1134 -.1260 .0981

Test that remaining correlations are zero: Wilk's Chi-SQ DF Sig. 1 .754 167.580 15.000 .000 2 .961 23.384 8.000 .003 3 .989 6.464 3.000 .091 Standardized Canonical Coefficients for Set-1 1 2 3 locusofc -.840 -.417 -.444 selfconc .248 -.838 .583 motivati -.433 .695 .686 Raw Canonical Coefficients for Set-1 1 2 3 locusofc -1.254 -.621 -.662 selfconc .351 -1.188 .827 motivati -1.262 2.027 2.000 Standardized Canonical Coefficients for Set-2 1 2 3 read -.451 -.050 .216 write -.349 .409 .888 math -.220 .040 .088 science -.049 -.827 -1.066 female -.315 .541 -.894 Raw Canonical Coefficients for Set-2 1 2 3 read -.045 -.005 .021 write -.036 .042 .091

math science female

-.023 -.005 -.632

.004 -.085 1.085

.009 -.110 -1.795

Canonical Loadings for Set-1 1 2 locusofc -.904 -.390 selfconc -.021 -.709 motivati -.567 .351 Cross Loadings for Set-1 1 2 locusofc -.420 -.065 selfconc -.010 -.119 motivati -.263 .059

3 -.176 .705 .745

3 -.018 .073 .077

Canonical Loadings for Set-2 1 2 3 read -.840 -.359 .135 write -.877 .065 .255 math -.764 -.298 .148 science -.658 -.677 -.230 female -.364 .755 -.543 Cross Loadings for Set-2 1 2 read -.390 -.060 write -.407 .011 math -.355 -.050 science -.306 -.113 female -.169 .126

3 .014 .026 .015 -.024 -.057

Redundancy Analysis: Proportion of Variance of Set-1 Explained by Its Own Can. Var. Prop Var CV1-1 .380 CV1-2 .259 CV1-3 .361 Proportion of Variance of Set-1 Explained by Opposite Can.Var. Prop Var CV2-1 .082 CV2-2 .007 CV2-3 .004 Proportion of Variance of Set-2 Explained by Its Own Can. Var. Prop Var CV2-1 .525

CV2-2 CV2-3

.250 .091

Proportion of Variance of Set-2 Explained by Opposite Can. Var. Prop Var CV1-1 .113 CV1-2 .007 CV1-3 .001 ------ END MATRIX -----

JELO
MANOVA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial designs.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s 600 0 0 1

o f

V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

cases accepted. cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. cases rejected because of missing data. non-empty cell.

1 design will be processed. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s * * * *

o f

V a r i a n c e -- Design

1 * * * * * * * * * * * * *

EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 3, M = 1/2, N = 295 ) Test Name Pillais Hotellings Wilks Roys Value .25425 .31430 .75436 .21538 Approx. F 11.00057 12.37633 11.71573 Hypoth. DF 15.00 15.00 15.00 Error DF 1782.00 1772.00 1634.65 Sig. of F .000 .000 .000

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations

Root No. 1 2 3

Eigenvalue .27450 .02887 .01093

Pct. 87.33628 9.18537 3.47836

Cum. Pct. 87.33628 96.52164 100.00000

Canon Cor. .46409 .16751 .10399

Sq. Cor .21538 .02806 .01081

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dimension Reduction Analysis Roots 1 TO 3 2 TO 3 3 TO 3 Wilks L. .75436 .96143 .98919 F 11.71573 2.94446 2.16461 Hypoth. DF 15.00 8.00 3.00 Error DF 1634.65 1186.00 594.00 Sig. of F .000 .003 .091

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (5,594) D. F. Variable locusofc selfconc motivati Sq. Mul. R .18062 .01957 .07874 Adj. R-sq. .17372 .01131 .07098 Hypoth. MS 9.72160 1.16669 1.10799 Error MS .37123 .49212 .10913 F 26.18789 2.37076 10.15338 Sig. of F .000 .038 .000

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable locusofc selfconc motivati 1 1.25383 -.35135 1.26242 2 -.62148 -1.18769 2.02726 3 .66169 -.82672 -2.00023

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable locusofc selfconc motivati 1 .84042 -.24788 .43267 2 -.41656 -.83793 .69480 3 .44352 -.58326 -.68554

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Function No. Variable 1 2 3

locusofc selfconc motivati

.90405 .02084 .56715

-.38969 -.70874 .35089

.17562 -.70516 -.74513

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. 1 2 3 Pct Var DEP 37.97982 25.90966 36.11052 Cum Pct DEP 37.97982 63.88948 100.00000 Pct Var COV 8.17994 .72701 .39050 Cum Pct COV 8.17994 8.90694 9.29745

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES Function No. COVARIATE read write math science female 1 .04462 .03588 .02342 .00503 .63212 2 -.00491 .04207 .00423 -.08516 1.08464 3 -.02138 -.09131 -.00940 .10984 1.79465

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES CAN. VAR. COVARIATE read write math science female 1 .45080 .34896 .22047 .04878 .31504 2 -.04961 .40921 .03982 -.82660 .54057 3 -.21601 -.88810 -.08848 1.06608 .89443

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables CAN. VAR. Covariate read write math science female 1 .84045 .87654 .76395 .65841 .36411 2 -.35883 .06484 -.29795 -.67680 .75493 3 -.13536 -.25456 -.14776 .23036 .54340

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables

CAN. VAR. 1 2 3

Pct Var DEP 11.30458 .70132 .09804

Cum Pct DEP 11.30458 12.00590 12.10394

Pct Var COV 52.48769 24.99409 9.06617

Cum Pct COV 52.48769 77.48177 86.54795

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ERIKA
Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term --- Individual Univariate .9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable .. locusofcontrol locus of control COVARIATE Upper B Beta Std. Err. .00390 .00391 .00405 .00390 .05554 self-concept Std. Err. .00449 .00450 .00466 .00449 .06395 motivation Std. Err. .00212 .00212 .00219 t-Value 2.12442 3.07173 1.11506 Sig. of t .034 .002 .265 Lower -95% .00034 .00235 -.00186 CLt-Value .40556 .32110 .06260 .33050 -2.80510 Sig. of t .685 .748 .950 .741 .005 Lower -95% -.00700 -.00739 -.00886 -.00734 -.30497 CLt-Value 3.20406 1.82460 1.55273 1.66151 2.74169 Sig. of t .001 .069 .121 .097 .006 Lower -95% .00484 -.00054 -.00166 -.00118 .04320 CL-

read .0125012816 .1884291038 .02016 write .0071308372 .1034758317 .01481 math .0062852668 .0882827182 .01424 science .0064838493 .0938912293 .01415 female .1522765148 .1132251523 .26136 Dependent variable .. selfconcept COVARIATE Upper B Beta

read .0018219073 .0260898261 .01064 write .0014448480 .0199192052 .01028 math .0002917787 .0038936508 .00945 science .0014849613 .0204295463 .01031 female -.1793816434 -.1267183304 .05379 Dependent variable .. motivation COVARIATE Upper read .00865 write .01067 math .00676 B .0044940607 .0065087910 .0024472239 Beta .1324760145 .1847156128 .0672249607

science .00002 female .09035

-.0041791340 .0312119119

-.1183540953 .0453873926

.00212 .03011

-1.97520 1.03648

.049 .300

-.00833 -.02793

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s * * * *

o f

V a r i a n c e -- Design

1 * * * * * * * * * * * * *

EFFECT .. CONSTANT Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 1/2, N = 295 ) Test Name Value Exact F 40.13751 40.13751 40.13751 Hypoth. DF 3.00 3.00 3.00 Error DF 592.00 592.00 592.00 Sig. of F .000 .000 .000

Pillais .16902 Hotellings .20340 Wilks .83098 Roys .16902 Note.. F statistics are exact.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. 1 Eigenvalue .20340 Pct. 100.00000 Cum. Pct. 100.00000 Canon Cor. .41112

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (1,594) D. F. Variable locusofc selfconc motivati Hypoth. SS 40.17499 .36661 .36426 Error SS 220.50777 292.31754 64.82061 Hypoth. MS 40.17499 .36661 .36426 Error MS .37123 .49212 .10913 F 108.22269 .74497 3.33797 Sig. of F .000 .388 .068

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable locusofc selfconc motivati 1 1.64028 -.00277 -.98872

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Standardized discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable locusofc selfconc motivati 1 .99940 -.00194 -.32662

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Estimates of effects for canonical variables Canonical Variable Parameter 1 1 -2.89667

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Canonical Variable Variable locusofc selfconc motivati 1 .94644 .07852 -.16622

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Abbreviated Name locusofc motivati selfconc Extended Name locusofcontrol motivation selfconcept

YUNG IBANG EXPLANTION GUYS SA BABA

SEE REFERENCE PRA SA MANOVA
Created Series Case Number of Non-Missing Values SET_NUM 1.00 1 Series Name VARSEQ First 1 Last 3 N of Valid Cases 3 Creating Function CSUM(VARSE Q) CSUM(VARSE Q)

2.00

VARSEQ

a. Pillais - This is Pillai's trace, one of the four multivariate statistics calculated by SPSS to test the null hypothesis that the canonical correlations are zero (which, in turn, means that there is no linear relationship between the two specified groups of variables). Pillai's trace is the sum of the squared canonical correlations, which can be found in the next section of output (see superscript n): 0.4642 + 0.1682 + 0.1042 = 0.25425. b. Hotellings - This is the Hotelling-Lawley trace. It is very similar to Pillai's trace and can be calculated as the sum of the values of (canonical correlation2/(1-canonical correlation2)). We can calculate 0.4642 /(1- 0.4642) + 1682/(1-0.1682) + 0.1042/(1-0.1042) = 0.31430. c. Wilks - This is Wilks' lambda, another multivariate statistic calculated by SPSS. It is the product of the values of (1-canonical correlation2). In this example, our canonical correlations are 0.4641, 0.1675, and 0.1040 so the Wilks' Lambda is (1- 0.4642)*(1-0.1682)*(10.1042) = 0.75436. d. Roys - This is Roy's greatest root. It can be calculated from the largest eigenvalue: largest eigenvalue/(1 + largest eigenvalue). Because it is based on a maximum, it can behave differently from the other three test statistics. In instances where the other three are not statistically significant and Roy's is statistically significant, the effect should be considered to be not statistically significant. e. Value - This is the value of the multivariate test listed in the prior column. f. (Approx.) F - These are the F values associated with the various tests that are included in SPSS's output. For the multivariate tests, the F values are approximate. g. Hypoth. DF, Error DF - These are the degrees of freedom used in determining the F values. Note that there are instances in which the degrees of freedom may be a non-integer because these degrees of freedom are calculated using the mean squared errors, which are often non-integers. h. Sig. of F - This is the p-value associated with the F value of a given test statistic. The null hypothesis that our two sets of variables are not linearly related is evaluated with regard to this p-value. For a given alpha level, such as 0.05, if the p-value is less than alpha, the null hypothesis is rejected. If not, then we fail to reject the null hypothesis. i. Root No. - This is the rank of the given eigenvalue (largest to smallest). There are as many roots as there were variables in the smaller of the two variable sets. In this example, our set of psychological variables contains three variables and our set of academic variables contains five variables. Thus the smaller variable set contains three variables and the analysis generates three roots. j. Eigenvalue - These are the eigenvalues of the product of the model matrix and the inverse of the error matrix. These eigenvalues can also be calculated using the squared canonical correlations. The largest eigenvalue is equal to largest squared correlation /(1- largest squared correlation); 0.215/(1-0.215) = 0.274. These calculations can be completed for each correlation to find the corresponding eigenvalue. The relative size of the eigenvalues reflect how much of the variance in the canonical variates can be explained by the corresponding canonical correlation. Thus, the eigenvalue corresponding to the first correlation is greatest, and all subsequent eigenvalues are smaller. k. Pct. - This is the percent of the sum of the eigenvalues represented by a given eigenvalue. The sum of the three eigenvalues is (0.2745+0.0289+0.0109) = 0.3143. Then, the proportions can be calculated: 0.2745/0.3143 = 0.8734, 0.0289/0.3143 = 0.0919, and 0.0109/0.3143 = 0.0348. This is the proportion of explained variance in the canonical variates attributed to a given canonical correlation. l. Cum. Pct. - This is the cumulative sum of the percents. m. Canon Cor. - These are the Pearson correlations of the pairs of canonical variates. The first pair of variates, a linear combination of the psychological measurements and a linear combination of the academic measurements, has a correlation coefficient of 0.464. The second pair has a correlation coefficient of 0.168, and the third pair 0.104. Each subsequent pair of canonical variates is less correlated. These can

be interpreted as any other Pearson correlations. That is, the square of the correlation represents the proportion of the variance in one group's variate explained by the other group's variate. n. Sq. Cor - These are the squares of the canonical correlations. For example, (0.464*0.464) = 0.215. o. Roots - This is the set of roots included in the null hypothesis being tested. The null hypothesis is that all of the correlations associated with the roots in the given set are equal to zero in the population. By testing these different sets of roots, we are determining how many dimensions are required to describe the relationship between the two groups of variables. Because each root is less informative than the one before it, unnecessary dimensions will be associated with the smallest eigenvalues. Thus, we start our test with the full set of roots and then test subsets generated by omitting the greatest root in the previous set. Here, we first tested all three roots, then roots two and three, and then root three alone. p. Wilks L. - Here, the Wilks lambda test statistic is used for testing the null hypothesis that the given canonical correlation and all smaller ones are equal to zero in the population. Each value can be calculated as the product of the values of (1-canonical correlation2) for the set of canonical correlations being tested. In this example, our canonical correlations are 0.464, 0.168 and 0.104, so the value for testing that all three of the correlations are zero is (1- 0.4642)*(1-0.1682)*(1-0.1042) = 0.75436. To test that the two smaller canonical correlations, 0.168 and 0.104, are zero in the population, the value is (1-0.1682)*(1-0.1042) = 0.96143. The value for testing that the smallest canonical correlation is zero is (1-0.1042) = 0.98919. q. Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT/COVARIATE variables - These are the raw canonical coefficients. They define the linear relationship between the variables in a given group and the canonical variates. They can be interpreted in the same manner as regression coefficients, assuming the canonical variate as the outcome variable. For example, a one unit increase in locus_of_control leads to a 1.254 unit increase in the first variate of the psychological measurements, and a one unit increase in read score leads to a 0.045 unit increase in the first variate of the academic measurements. Recall that our variables varied in scale. This is reflected in the varied scale of these raw coefficients. r. Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT/COVARIATE variables - These are the standardized canonical coefficients. This means that, if all of the variables in the analysis are rescaled to have a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1, the coefficients generating the canonical variates would indicate how a one standard deviation increase in the variable would change the variate. For example, an increase of one standard deviation inlocus_of_control would lead to a 0.840 standard deviation increase in the first variate of the psychological measurements, and an increase of one standard deviation in read would lead to a 0.451 standard deviation increase in the first variate of the academic measurements. s. Correlations between DEPENDENT/COVARIATE variables and canonical variables - These are the correlations between each variable in a group and the group's canonical variates. For example, we can see in the "dependent" variables that locus_of_control has a Pearson correlation of 0.904 with the first psychological variate, -0.390 with the second psychological variate, and 0.176 with the third psychological variate. In the "covariates" section, we can see that read has a Pearson correlation of 0.840 with the first academic variate, 0.359 with the second academic variate, and -0.135 with the third academic variate. t. Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables - This is the degree to which the canonical variates of both the dependent variables (DE) and covariates (CO) can explain the standardized variability in the dependent variables. For both sets of canonical variates, the percent and cumulative percent of variability explained by each variate is displayed. u. Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables - This is the degree to which the canonical variates of both the dependent variables (DE) and covariates (CO) can explain the standardized variability in the covariates. For both sets of canonical variates, the percent and cumulative percent of variability explained by each variate is displayed