AJCHE,HECTOR

A205-495-095
C/O ICE
.b. 68tB6H009t06
Executive Offce fr Immigation Review
8oardof ImmlgratlonappeaL
ujceoftheC|erk
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000
Fall Church, Vrginia 20530
OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel - NEW
P.O. Box 1898
Newark, NJ 07101
ESSEX COUNTY JAIL 354 DOREMUS
AVENUE
NEWARK, NJ 07105
Name:AJCHE,HECTOR A 205-495-095
Date of this notice: 2/10/2014
Enclosed is a copy of te Board's decision and order lu the above-referenced case.
Enclosure
|DBl MBDDSI5.
UBDCB|SDB|gB|, JCDR
Sincerely,
DCc t
Donna Ca
Chief Clerk
USC@BS
U5BlSH. |CCK
W . .M . .. P -. . +
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Hector Ajche, A205 495 095 (BIA Feb. 10, 2014)
= .b. 6gBtl6Hl 0Ju8fC6
xecutive Offce r Immigation Review
Falls Lhur0h, Virginia 2J
File: A205 495 095 - Newark, New Jersey
In re: HECTOR AJCHE
REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
APPEAL AND MOTION
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Pro se
CHARGE:
Decision of the BOad oflmmigration Appeals
Date:
FEB 1
0 2014
Notice: Sec. 212(a)(6)(A)(i), l&N Act [8 U.S.C. 182(a)(6)(A)(i)] -
Present without being admitted or paroled
APPLICATION:
The respondent has appealed fom the Immigration Judge's October 17, 2013, decision,
ordering him removed to Guatemala, and to Mexico, in the alternative. The summary order
issued that date notes that the respondent waived appeal. Nevertheless, on October 30, 2013, the
Board received a Notice of Appeal fom the respondent urging various errors in his proceedings
befre the Immigration Judge and submitting what is styled as a motion to reopen and reconsider
te Immigration Judge's decision. The Immigration Judge's summay order will be vacated, and
the case remanded to the Immigration Cour fr furher proceedings consistent with this opinion.
We have reviewed the transcript of the proceedings and fnd that it does not clearly refect that
the respondent, who was detained ad acting pro se, knowingly and intelligently waived his right
to appeal. See Matter of Rodriguez-Diaz, 22 I&N Dec. 1320, 1322 (BIA 2000) (an unrepresented
alien who accepts a decision as "fnal" does not efectively waive appeal where it was not made
clear that such acceptance constittes a irevocable waiver of appeal rights). Specifcally, at te
conclusion of the October 17, 2013, hearing, the Immigration Judge told the respondent that he
was ordering his deportation to Mexico, and asked the respondent if he wanted "to appeal this to a
higher court or . .. waive appeal and accept the order as fnal?" See Tr. at 17. The respondent
equivocated in his response stating that "it's a fnal decision, because I have no one here to help
me, and only God knows" (Tr. at 17). We ae not persuaded by this exchange that the respondent
clearly wished to waive his right to appeal the decision, nor is there any indication that the
respondent understood their fnal exchange to constitute a waiver of these rights. Thus, we fnd
that the record does not suppor a conclusion that the respondent knowingly and intelligently
waived his right to appeal, ad the appeal is properly befre us.
The record will be remanded, however, fr a fll decision on the merits. It appeas that the
Immigration Judge may have declined to issue a fll oral decision in view of his determination that
appeal had been waived. As we fnd the respondent did not waive his right to appeal, the
Immigration Judge's sum ay decision is inadequate fr appellate review and a remand is
warranted fr prepaation of a fll decision setting frth the Immigration Judge1s fndings of fct
and legal analysis on all relevant issues in this case. See generally Matter of S-H-,
23 I&N Dec. 462 (BIA 2002); Matter of -1-, 22 I&N Dec. 468 (BIA 1999). Upon preparation
~
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Hector Ajche, A205 495 095 (BIA Feb. 10, 2014)
A205 495 095
-
of the fll decision, the Immigration Judge shall issue an order administratively retuing the
record to the Board. The Immigration Judge shall serve the administrative retu order on the
respondent and the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"). The Board will thereafer give
the paries an opportuity to submit briefs in accordance with the regulations.
Accordingly, the fllowing orders will entered,
ORER: The Immigration Judge's summary order of October 17, 2013, is vacated.
FURTHER ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Court fr frther
proceedings consistent with this opinion, and fr the entry of a new decision.

2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Hector Ajche, A205 495 095 (BIA Feb. 10, 2014)
JN THE EHOVA CASE OF
ACHE, HECTOR
RESPONDENT

U1TED STATES JHHJGRAT1ON COURT

3JD BROAD STREET ROOH 12D
NEwARK, NJ J2
CASE NO.: A2D~43~3
ORDERS
TD1B 1B 0e0OIDOU0 O LDe COUIL'B DeC1B1OD DO OIOeIB eDLeIeO OD
. TD1B 0e0OIDOU0 1B BO1e1y OI *e
CODVeD1eDCe O LDe gIL1eB. TDe OI1 OI wI1LLeD F1DO1DgB D' 1B1OD
DU OIUeIB 1B LDe O1C11 Og1D1OD 1D LD1B CBe ' ( BOXu IL1eB
w1VeO 1BBUDCe O OI01 OI1 eC1B1OD 1D LDe CBe. 1 '

/
TD

Ie

IOeIe

RENO IO0 LDe

UD1LeO SLLBB LO QR '

r

I D DBeDL1.
ReBgODOeDL'B gg11CL1OD OI VOLUTAY DEPARTURE wB DEN1ED DO
IeBgODUeDL wB OIOeIeO Ie0OVeO LO 1D LDe
1LeIDL1Ve LO

ReBgODUeDL'B gg11CL1OD OI VOLUTAY DEPARTURE wB GRATED UCL11

' UgOD gOBL1Dg VO1UDLIy OegILUIe DODO 1D LDe 0OUDL

O $ LO DHS w1LD1D 1Ve DUB1DeBB OyB IO0 LDe OLe O LD1B
OIOeI w1LD D 1LeIDLe OIOeI O Ie0OV1 LO
OI ReBgODOeDL BD11 gIeBeDL LO DHS w1LD1D
} LD1ILy OyB } B1XLy OyB IO0 LDe OLe O LD1B OIOeI, 1J
DeCeBBIy LIVe1 OOCU0eDLB OI VO1UDLIy OegILUIe
ReBgODUeDL'B gg11CL1OD OI ASYLU wB ' } gIDLeO } OeD1eO
' } w1LDOIwD w1LD gIe_UO1Ce.
' } BUD_eCL LO LDe ANUAL CAP UDOeI LDe 1NA BeCL1OD 2DJ'} (5}.
' } ReBgODOeDL KDOw1Dg1y 11eU FR1VOLOUS By1U0 gg11CL1OD.
ReBgODOeDL`B gg11CL1OD OI w1THHOLD1NG O Ie0OV1 UDOeI JNA
BeCL1OD 241'D} (3) wB ' } gIDLeO ' } OeD1eU ' } w1LDOIwD w1LD
gIe_UO1Ce.
ReBgODOeDL'B gg11CL1OD OI w1THHOLD1NG O Ie0OV1 UDOeI LDe TOILUIe
CODVeDL1OD wB ' } gIDLeO ' } UeD1eO ' } w1LDOIw w1LD gIe_UO1Ce.
ReBgODOeDL'B gg11CL1OD OI DEFERRAL O IemOV1 UDOeI LDe TOILUIe
CODVeDL1OD wB ' } gIDLeU ' } OeD1eO ' } w11DOIwD w1LD gIe_UO1Ce.
ReBgODOeDL'B gg11CL1OD OI CACELLATJON O Ie0OV1 UDOeI BeCL1OD
[ } 23 'D} O NACAA, ' } 24DA') } 24A'D} '1} ' } 24DA'D} '2}
O LDe JNA wB ' } gIDLeO ' } OeD1eO } w1LDOIwD w1LD gIe_UO1Ce.
1 gIDLeO 1L wB OIOeIeO LDL LDe DHS 1BBUe 11 ggIOgI1Le OOCU0eDLB
DeCeBBIy LO g1Ve eeCL LO LD1B OIUeI ReBgODUeDL ' } 1B ' ) 1B DOL
BUDgeCL LO LDe UAL CAP UDOeI JNA BeCL1OD 24DA'e)
ReBgODOeDL`B gg11CL1OD OI wA1VER UDOeI LDe 1NA BeCL1OD
wB ' } gIDLeU ' } OeD1eO ( } w1LDOIwD OI
) OLDeI
:
! ( } TDe CODO1L1ODB 1mgOBeU Dy
IA BeCL1OD 216 OD LDe IegODOCDLB geI0DeDL IeB1OeDL BLLUB weIe Ie0OveO.
ReBgODUeDL`B gg11CL1OD OI AJUSTNENT O BLLUB UDOeI BeCL1OD
O LDe ' } JNA ' } NACARA ' ) wB
' } gIDLeO ' ) OeD1O ( } w1LDOIwD w1LD g_UOCe J gIDLeO
1L wB OIOeIeO LDL DH@B 11 ggIOgI1LeOOB DeCeBBIy LO
g1Ve eeCL LO LD1B OIOeI.
CASE NUHBER: 25~495~D35 RESPONDENT: AJCHE HECTOR
ReBgODOeDL'B BLLuB wBB REBCTNDED guIBuDL LO LDe INA BeCL1OD 246.
ReBgODOeDL`B 0OL1OD LO w1THDRw D1B gg11CL1OD OI O01BB1OD wB
. ,' . - ;_ - . .
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t

* *
} gIDLeO ) OeD1eO. J LDe IeBgODOeDL 11B LO D1Oe Dy Dy O
LDe CODO1L1ODB O1IeCLeO Dy LDe O1BLI1CL O1IeCLOI O DHS, LDeD LDe
1LeIDLe OIOeI O Ie0OV1 BD11 DeCO0e 100eO1Le1y eeCL1Ve w1LDOUL
UILDeI DOL1Ce OI gIOCeeO1DgB: LDe IeBgODOeDL BD11 De Ie0OVeO IO0
LDe UD1LeO SLLeB LO
ReBgODOeDL wB HJTTED
OIOeIeO LO gOBL $
B UDL11
AB CODO1L1OD O O01BB1OD, LDe IeBgODOeDL wB
DODO.
CBe wB j ) TERNJNATED ) w1LD ) w1LDOUL gIejUO1Ce
NJNJSTRATJVELY CLOSED.
ReBgODOeDL wB OI11y OV1BeO O LDe LJHJTATJON OD O1BCIeL1ODIy
Ie11e DO CODBegUeDCeB OI 11UIe LO OegIL B OIOeIeO.
) J yOU 11 LO VO1UDLI11y OegIL wDeD DO B IegU1IeO yOU BD11
De BUDjeCL LO C1V11 0ODey geD1Ly O L 1eBL $JDDD, DUL DOL 0OIe LDD
$5DDD, DO De 1De11g1D1e OI geI1OO O JD yeIB OI Dy UILDeI
Ie11e UDOeI JNA BeCL1ODB 24DA 24DB 245 DO 24B \JNA SeCL1OD 24DB\O)).
) J yOU Ie UDOeI 1D1 OIOeI O Ie0OV1, DO 1 yOU w111U11y 11
DLe:
OI IeUBe LO J) OegIL wDeD DO B IegU1IeO, 2) 0Ke L10e1y gg11CL1OD
1D gOOO 1LD OI Dy OOCU0eDLB DeCeBBIy OI OegILUIe, OI 3) gIeBeDL
yOUIBe1 OI IemOV1 L LDe L1me DO g1Ce IegU1IeO, OI, 1 yOU CODBg1Ie
LO OI LKe Dy CL1OD OeB1gDeO LO gIeVeDL OI D0geI yOUI OegILUIe yOU
BD1 De BUDjeCL LO C1V11 0ODey geD1Ly O Ug LO $5DD OI eCD Oy UDOeI
BUCD V1O1L1OD. (JNA BeCL1OD 2J4Dj)) J yOU Ie Ie0OVD1e gUIBUDL
LO JNA 23Jj), LDeD yOU BD11 UILDeI De 1DeO DO/OI 10gI1BODeO OI Ug
LO JD yeIB. (JNA BeCL1OD 243j) (J)}.
OLDeI:
10/r/J
APPEAL: <X w1VeO
DUE BY:
} IeBeIVeO Dy ) ReBgODOeDL ) DHS BOLD
CERTJFJCATE OF SERVJCE
THJS UHENT wAS SERVED BY: ) HAJL [ ERSONAL SERVJCE
TO: DHS

EN j ) A11eD`B ATT/R j AJEN CUBLO1CeI

DATE:

BY: ) COURT STAFF ) J GE

* *****
Y2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t