Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166
ISSN 0975 5942 Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 Visit: http://www.isaps-india.org/APJSS/index.htm International Society for Asia-Pacific Studies (ISAPS), www.isaps-india.org Regional Planning and the Waste Land Development in India: An Overview Mohammad Afsar Alam Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Adi-Keih, Eritrea, N.E. Africa, Email: drmaalam92@gmail.com Abstract Wasteland means degraded and unutilized lands except current fallows due to different constraints (CSIR, 1990). It includes areas of degraded forests, hilly slopes, eroded valleys; water logged marshy lands, ravine, sheet and gully erosion, shifting cultivation, salinity and alkalinity, shifting and sand dunes, wind erosion, extreme moisture deficiency, riverine lands, coastal sand dunes etc. where crop production is not economical. In fact, these are degraded lands and are ecologically unstable with almost complete loss of top soil and are unsuitable for cultivation due to decline in their quality and productivity. Poor land practices have led to malnutrition and decline in production capacity of the soil. It is estimated that in wastelands the biomass production is less than 20 per cent of its overall potential. Wasteland development is one of the major policy considerations in India since it represents under utilization of available land resources. It is precisely to restore this ecological imbalance by developing the degraded non-forest wastelands, the Government of India had created the Department of wasteland Development during July 1992 under the Ministry of Rural Development, which has been subsequently recognized and renamed Department of Land Resources, with a broader mandate. In the present paper an attempt has been made to discuss the need for an appropriate regional planning for the wasteland development on the basis of shortcomings in the existing system of macro-level sectoral planning mechanism. Keywords: Wasteland, Degraded land, Development, Planning Mohammad Afsar Alam 1S3 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 Introduction India shares 17 per cent of the world population, while its land is 2 per cent of the total geographical area of the world. Naturally, the pressure on the land is beyond its carrying capacity. Therefore, the productive lands, especially the farmlands in India are in the constant process of various degrees of degradation and are fast turning into wastelands. At present, approximately 68.35 million hectare area of land is lying as wastelands in India. Out of these lands, approximately 50 per cent lands are such non-forest lands, which can be made fertile again if treated properly. It was unprotected non-forest lands, which suffered the maximum degradation mainly due to the tremendous biotic pressure on it. In the last 50 years it is Indias lush green village forests and woodlots have been deforestated to the maximum, (Fig. 1). To restore this ecological imbalance, the Government of India had created the Department of Wasteland Development to develop the degraded non- forest wastelands. The wastelands represent under utilization of resources. In fact, the prevalence of poverty, malnutrition, hunger and regional inequality is to some extent due to under utilization of resources particularly in India, it exists in the form of wastelands. It could be noted that a country like Japan has inadequate land area with high density of population, but it has achieved a high rate of economic development, indicating their intensive effort towards better utilization of resources. In India, despite having a large land area, the problem of under utilization of resources persists in different parts of the country. Hence, there is a growing concern on wasteland development in India. Wasteland development could be achieved only through formulation and implementation of specific regional planning. National Wasteland Board was established in 1985 under the Ministry of Forest and Environment mainly to tackle the problem of degradation of lands, restoration of ecology and to meet the growing demands of fuel wood and fodder at the national level. During the Seventh Five Year Plan the strategy adopted by the National Wasteland Board emphasized more on tree planting activities rather than community participation for wasteland development. In the year 1992, the new department under the Ministry of Rural Development (now Ministry of Rural Areas and Employment) was created and the National Wasteland Board was placed under it. The board was reconstituted in August 1992 and was made responsible mainly for Mohammad Afsar Alam 1S4 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 development of wastelands in non-forest areas in totality by involving local people at every stage of development. It aims at creating a scenario where the Government acts as a facilitator and the people at the grass root level become the real executioner of the programme. Major programme implemented for improving the productivity of wastelands and degraded lands keeping in view the poverty, backwardness, gender and equality is Integrated Wastelands Development Programme. Fig. 1 Environmentally Degraded Wastelands Categories of Waste Land in India In India there are two types of wastelands in general i.e. ecological wastelands and developmental wastelands. The ecological wastelands consist of degraded forests, gullied and ravenous lands, marked hill slopes, saline-alkali soils, deserts, sand dunes and shifting cultivation areas. The developmental wastelands include mine spoils areas, water logged areas formed by seepage of canal irrigation, foreshores of irrigation reservoirs, industrial wastelands, Mohammad Afsar Alam 1SS Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 land strip cleared for laying of electric transmission and so on. Area wise detailed account of categories of wastelands (Table 1), and their maps 2, 3 and 4 are given below respectively. Table 1 Categories of Wastelands in India S.No. Category Area (in sq.Kms.) 1 Snow covered/Glacial 55788.49 2 Barren rocky/Sheet Rock 64584.77 3 Sands-inland/Coastal 50021.65 4 Land affected by Salinity/ alkalinity 20477.38 5 Gullied/or ravenous land 20553.35 6 Upland with or without scrub 194014.29 7 Water logged & marshy 16568.45 8 Steep sloping area 7656.29 9 Shifting cultivation land 35142.2 10 Mining/industrial wastelands 1252.13 11 Degraded/pastures/grazing land 25978.91 12 Underutilized/degraded notified forest land 140652.31 13 Degraded land under plantation crop 5828.09 Grand Total: 638518. 31 Sq.Kms. Fig. 2 Incidence of A Category Environmentally Degraded Wasteland Mohammad Afsar Alam 1S6 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 The degradation of environment in the fragile Indian sub- tropical ecosystem is basically attributed to: Increasing biotic pressure. Absence of adequate investments and appropriate management practices. Over exploitation of natural resources. The break-down of traditional institutions for managing common property resources and failure of new institutions to fill the vacuum, and Faulty land use practices. Consequences Soil erosion and land degradation. Depletion of natural resources. Lower productivity. Ground water depletion. Shortage of drinking water. Reduction in species diversity, and Increase in the extent of wasteland. Table 2 Estimate of Wastelands from Different Sources S.No. Sources Area (m.ha) Estimated (E)/Scientific (S) 1 National Commission on Agriculture(NCA-1976) 175.00 E 2 Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation 38.40 E 3 Ministry of Agriculture (1982) 175.00 E 4 Department of Environment and Forest 95.00 E 5 National Wasteland Development Board 123.00 E 6 NBBS and LUP, ICAR, 1994 187.00 E 7 Society for Promotion of Wastelands 129.00 E 8 # National Remote Sensing Agency, 1995 75.50 S 9 Dr.N.C. Saxena (Secretary RD-WD) 125.00 E # The figure of 75.50 m.ha is derived from the results of land use/land cover mapping done on1:250,000 scale during 1989-90, using satellite data at the request of Planning Commission for increasing food production in various Agro-climatic zones. Mohammad Afsar Alam 1S7 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 In this context, it is important to highlight the extent of variation in the spatial distribution of wastelands throughout the country. In fact, in India the wasteland ranges from 38 to 187 million hectares, according to the estimates given by different agencies with diverse classification strategies, table 2. Fig. 3 Incidence of B Category Environmentally Degraded Wastelands Fig. 4 Incidence of C Category Environmentally Degraded Wastelands Mohammad Afsar Alam 1S8 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 Problems of Planning Wasteland Development India is one of the biggest countries of the world, so wasteland in India is not the same everywhere. It vary significantly in terms of its nature, type, formation and location as per the given data and maps. As the nature and causes of wasteland formation are not the same in different parts of the country. Hence, the wasteland development plan suitable for one region may not be suitable for another region. No doubt, in different five years plans, the Government of India has launched various programmes first under the Ministry of Rural Development and then under the Ministry of Land Resources to develop the degraded wastelands in different parts of the country, but it could not achieved its targeted objectives. In fact, the present system of planning of wasteland development is based on routine process of implementation. Although the district, and blocks are accepted as a proper unit of administration of our planning programme, the planning machineries and administrative agencies are inadequate both in number and quality in formulation and implementation of wasteland development programmes. There has not been proper much decentralization of plan formulation at the district and block levels in identification and planning of activities for wasteland development. As per the instructions given by the respective heads of the departments, wasteland development programmes are usually implemented at the state of regional level i.e. agriculture and forest departments. The concept of regional consideration may not receive substantial attraction among our planners in selection of appropriate activities for wasteland development. It could be seen clearly that the present systems of planning for wasteland development do not have any systematic effort on locational implications. The lack of systematic approach probably not attempted due to the magnitude of task involved is mainly responsible for our failure to bring sustainable development of wastelands. This failure is attributed to lack of scientific analysis of the region. There is a reason to believe that the implementation of the plans, however, has been left to the judgment of local officials and sometime politicians. The Strategy and Regional Planning Approach Development of wastelands mainly in non-forest areas aimed at checking land degradation putting such wastelands of the country to sustainable use and increasing bio-mass availability especially that Mohammad Afsar Alam 1S9 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 of fuel wood, fodder, fruits, fiber and small timber, the Government of India is taking up this colossal task through its Integrated Wasteland Development Project Scheme (IWDP) by revitalizing and reviving village level institutions and enlisting peoples participation. It is peoples own programme which aims at giving them actual decision making powers in terms of project implementation and fund disbursal. It is one of the programmes which are making sincere efforts towards the empowerment of the people so that a sense of collective responsibility can be evolved among them. The new guidelines for watershed development* provides a paradigm shift in the traditional approach where the role of Government is changed from that of governance to facilitation. The institutional arrangements envisaged in the guidelines can be seen as a reflection where the sustainability comes through the involvement of the people and the local bodies. The approach of watershed development in a holistic manner automatically strikes a prudent balance between environmental concerns and developmental aspirations. The efforts being made under the guidelines can be termed as sincere and honest as here the survival of life itself is at a stake with the watershed development rather than the quality of life itself as compared to similar situations in the developed countries. Man and environment are interdependent. The changes in the environment directly affect the lives of the people depending on it. A degraded environment means a degraded quality of life of the people. Environmental degradation can be tackled effectively through the holistic development of the watershed. A watershed provides natural geo-hydrological unit for planning any developmental initiative. In fact, the effective community control has been an integral part of the Indian social fabric which was fragmented by the colonial rule. This programme is an effort towards its restoration and a small step in the achievement of this goal which might turn into a big leap with the support from the people. In order to develop wastelands through the devices of regional planning, it is crucial to have a scientific study and systematic planning procedure. The development of wastelands depends on the effective implementation of regional planning which can be made in order to realize the desired objectives only when the Mohammad Afsar Alam 160 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 nature, type, forms of wastelands and their resource potentials are identified in different parts of the country. In this paper an attempt has been made to prepare a model regional planning programme for wasteland development. Objectives and Management of Waste Land Development Programme The wasteland development programme has manifold objectives. Goals in this regard are given below: Identification of area specific wastelands in different parts of the country. To check further degradation of land. Sustainable use of degraded lands. Increasing biomass availability along with nourishing soil. Restoration of ecological balance. * Watershed development refers to conservation, regeneration and the judicious use of all the resources. Developing wasteland extension programme. Selection and utilization of appropriate technology. Ecological regeneration of degraded lands. Consultancy services in the field of activities selected for the wasteland development. Coordinating integrated wasteland development regional planning programme. Implementing mechanisms for the improvement and sustainable use of technology for wasteland development. This can be done by participatory approach with the help of local people in the planning and management of lands. Ecosystem approaches in management considering watershed, would ensure integration of various ecological components (both biotic and abiotic). This would also help in enhancing the socio-economic status of a region. Similar approaches practiced in drier districts like Ananthpur (Andhra Pradesh), Tumkur, Banglore rural (Karnataka) have yielded positive results with increase in land productivity and ground water levels in the respective watersheds. Mohammad Afsar Alam 161 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 People friendly action programme helps local people and organizations in rehabilitating and improving the degraded lands. In this regard, management aspects are: Fixing target areas (degraded forest areas and pastures, public and private wastelands, farmlands with lower productivity). Assessing the infrastructure available to meet the requirement. Finding the possibilities of involving the Government, NGOs, and local people. The key element of a participatory approach being local peoples priorities; provision of secure rights and gains to the poor; flexible approaches; working with local groups and institutions, capacity building of motivated local people. Government has to give priorities in terms of funding, encouragement, and policy making. Measures to strengthen local organizations, by delegating more power and responsibility to local communities, decentralized resources management etc. Research and information access to understand the causes for land degradation and effective means to address them. Wasteland monitoring and preparedness. NGOs have pivotal task in the implementation of the action plan. Mechanisms by which local people, NGOs and other groups can contribute to implementation and monitoring of wasteland development programme on regular basis. Promoting conservation of natural resources through traditional knowledge. Promoting ideas to consider the village as an ecosystem and to maintain its integrity. Providing examples of the practices done at different places. Integrated village ecosystem planning with watershed approach needs to be espoused for sustainable development. This would enhance the total natural resources base by restoration and management of degraded wastelands, production of basic biomass needs of the village community and equity in distribution of biomass resources. Mohammad Afsar Alam 162 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 Action Plan The following action plan is proposed for the sustainable development of wastelands in India. Employment of people through institutional arrangements. Planning from below bottom up approach. Sustainability through peoples participation. In situ soil and moisture conservation measures like terracing, bunding, trenching, vegetative barriers and drainage line treatment should be adopted. Planting and sowing of multi-purpose trees, shrubs, grasses, legumes and pasture land should be developed. Natural regeneration should be encouraged. Promotion of agro-forestry and horticulture. Wood substitution and fuel wood conservation measures. Awareness raising, training and extension among local people should be encouraged. Encouraging peoples participation through community organization and capacity building. Drainage line treatment by vegetative and engineering structures. Development of small water Harvesting Structures. Afforestation of degraded forest and non-forest wasteland. Development and conservation of common property resources. Selection of suitable and fast growing species of plants to revetage the degraded forest wasteland. The growth of phytoplankton and other aquatic plant species in water logged areas should be harvested for manufacturing bio-fertilizers. Land affected by shifting cultivation should be rehabilitated through revegetating the wastelands with indigenous species. Efforts should be made to practice agriculture in marshy lands with the application of appropriate technology. Encouragement of common wastelands should be checked. Developing non-farm activities in salt affected lands. In order to develop wastelands, suitable animal husbandry programmes such as dairy development with good market facilities should be formulated and implemented. Mohammad Afsar Alam 163 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 There is too much scope to utilize wastelands for industrial purposes. Entrepreneurship development programme should be organized periodically and frequently, focusing on the possibility of starting industries in the wastelands. Data Collection and Findings Data findings are considered as the pre-requisite for the successful implementation of wasteland regional planning. Data collection should be made keeping the following key points in mind: It should be done on regular and periodic basis. Quality of land should be assessed in terms of biological and chemical properties of soils in the wastelands. Field trips should be organized in order to update frequent changes and development in wastelands. Required information on local resource potential should be gathered from different sources, such as local industrial department, local entrepreneurs, NGOs, Geologists and Geographers. Work should be started on the basis of available information from surveys at the appropriate level according to the status of different types of wastelands. Undertake the updating analysis and interpretation of data derived from identification, sampling and evaluation activities. Inter-disciplinary approach should be adopted while data collection. Undertake inventories with the involvement of local people and identify the local peoples behavior on utilization of wasteland resources. Means of Implementation So far as the implementation of regional wasteland development planning is concerned, no doubt, it would be a difficult task for any single department. Therefore, it is an utmost requirement to integrate and coordinate various activities for successful implementation of regional wasteland development planning. Hence there is a need to focus on the following efforts: Special regional planning units should be established at micro- level, i.e. at the district and block level for the formulation and implementation of wasteland development programme. Mohammad Afsar Alam 164 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 By human resource development and institution building, the regional level capacity should be developed and strengthen. Allocation of activities should be made appropriately among various departments, such as forest department, agricultural department, social forest department and departments of allied activities for effective implementation of it s objectives, targets, and priorities of wasteland development programme. Areas of operation of various agencies should be properly demarcated in implementing wasteland development programmes. Motivating local people to take part in the selection and cultivation of indigenous species of crops in degraded wastelands, shifting cultivation lands and so on. Efficient use of trained personnel in scientific and technological fields relevant to the identification of appropriate activities for sustainable development of wastelands. The capacity of government and private institutions, NGOs, and local communities should be enhanced with a view to undertake inter-sectoral coordination and planning for wasteland development. Conclusion The present system of planning is based on centralized system, though decentralized attempts have been made during various plan periods. In this situation, the planning for wasteland development at the overall level may not be suitable for different regions in the country. The reason is that the planning done at the national level has not given due consideration to regional aspect of development. Due to neglect of spatial aspect of development, planning has consistently been at the macro-level. It can be traced that the nature and causes of wastelands formations are not the same in all parts of the country. Wasteland formation differs significantly in different regions and in different forms. Hence, we need specific regional planning for sustainable wasteland development. But at present there is no specific regional planning for wasteland development in India. It is taken as a part of agricultural sectoral planning. Hence, the formulation and implementation of integrated Wasteland Development Planning depends on the important points discussed above. Mohammad Afsar Alam 16S Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 References Abdul Aziz and Sudhir Krishna (ed) (1996), Regional Development, Problems and policy measures, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi. Agarwal, A. and Narain S. 1990. Village Ecosystem Planning, Centre for Science and Environment, International Institute for Environment and Development, Dryland Network Programme. Chattopadhayay (1985), Rural Development Planning in India, S. Chand and Company Ltd., New Delhi. Forest Research Institute, 1988. Wasteland Development for Fuelwood and Fodder Production. FRI Press, New Delhi. Khan, I. 1987. Wasteland Afforestation (Techniques and Systems), Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. Mazzucato, M. and Niemeijer, D, 2001. Over Estimating Land Degradation, Underestimating in the Sahel,International Institute for Environment and Development, Dryland Network Programme. Munirathna, K (1984), Area Planning for Regional Development, Inter- India Publications, New Delhi. Nanjundappa D.M. and R.K. Shina (1982), Backward Area Development, Problems and Prospects, Sterling Publishing Company, New Delhi. Patel, M.L. (1983), Regional Development in India, Applied Publishers, New Delhi. Roy, A. K. and Verma S. K. 2001. Wasteland Management and Environment, Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India. Shashtri, S (1988), Regional Dissimilarities in Economic Development of Rajasthan (1961-84). Sundar.I (2011), Wasteland Development Through Regional Planning, Indian Journal of Millennium Development Studies: An International Journal, Vol. 6, Numbers 1-2, January-December, 2011: pp. 19-25. Mohammad Afsar Alam 166 Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.V(1), Jan-June 2013, pp.152-166 Tiwari, R.T. (1984), Inter-Regional Disparities in Levels of Development- Indian Experience, Man and Development, Vol. 6, N0. 7, pp.17-33. Toulmin, C. 1993. Combating Desertification: Setting Agenda for a Global Convention, International Institute for Environment and Development, Dryland Network Programme. Toulrnin, C. 1995. The Convention to Combat Desertification: Guideline for NGOs activity, International Institute for Environment and Development, Dryland Network Programme. V. Nath (1965), Resource Development Regions and Divisions of India, Planning Commission, New Delhi.