diferent stages in the research process (like the study described in
Box 2.1 below, when the researcher, Janice Morse, began with an open and inductive approach and, upon discovering a specifc phe- nomenon, developed diferent hypotheses abductively that were tested in a comparative design with deductive elements). Who should be interviewed? Tis is the question of selection and sampling. According to Roulston (who follows LeCompte and Preissle), one needs to draw a distinction between selection and sampling (Roulston, 2010, p. 81). Selection refers to the general decisions concerning who should be in focus in the study (e.g. adults sufering from depression) and sampling refers to the process of fnding a subset of the population that has been selected as relevant (e.g. 20 depressed adults, an equal number of women and men, recruited from Clinic X in Y-ville, representing adults sufering from depression). In most quantitative studies, the goal is to obtain a representative sample, which may enable researchers to generalize from the sample to the general population. Tis can also be a goal in qualitative research, but because most qualitative projects aim for thorough analyses in depthrather than larger and broader analysesthey ofen employ other sampling strategies. Sampling becomes a particularly pertinent issue in case-study research, because researchers study just one single case, and Flyvbjerg (2006) discusses a number of diferent ways of selection, based on diferent interests. Random selection can be employed to avoid systematic biases in the sample (here the size of the sample is decisive for gener- alization, but this is ofen not relevant for qualitative studies). In general, random selection as a conscious choice is employed only in quantitative projects. Information-oriented selection is normally more relevant in qualitative inquiry. Te goal is here to maximize the utility of information from small samples and single cases. Cases are selected on the basis of expectations about their information content (Flyvbjerg, 2006, p. 230). Tis means that the researchers knowl- edge about the feld becomes relevant. With information-oriented selection, the researcher can choose to look for (1) extreme cases in order to be able to say something about the phenomenon in its purest form (e.g. adults sufering from severe depression),