1.

0 INTRODUCTION

Peat mining can define as operation which is done by dredging it from a floating pontoon
with a dragline. The pontoon floated on a pool of water (the dredge pool) created by the hole left
by the removal of peat. Conservation are aims to conserve, improve and make more efficient use
of natural resources through integrated management of available soil, water and biological
resources combined with external inputs (Garcia et al., 2003).

There are many country of peat mining in the world even they can give bad impact to
Earth. There are Finland, Alaska, Minnesota, Florida, New Brunswick (Canada), Ireland,
Turkey, Belarus, South African, Malawi and US. Most of this country makes peat mining as one
of their industry.

Energy is vital for all modern societies and crucial for the economies of developed and
developing countries. The recent dispute between Ukraine and Russia about natural gas, where
Russia cut off gas exports to Ukraine during the winter 2006, is a vivid example of the
importance of energy supply diversification (Bellais, 2007).

Peat is mined mainly for fuel. In several countries peat is mined and burned for its energy
value, providing an important local and national source of heat and power. In total, some 21
million tones of peat generate about five to six million tones of oil equivalent per year (IPS and
IMCG, 2002). Mined peat also offers an ideal substrate for horticultural and silvicultural plant
production.There are many other uses of peatlands and peat, including fertilizer, building and
insulation systems, animal stable litter, alcoholic drinks, environmental improvement and
purification systems, balneology, therapy, medicine and textiles.

Peat mining will give bad impact to biodiversity of the word. Wetlands provide a
diversity of habitats for macro and microorganisms to complete their life cycle and habitat
degradation has serious repercussions on the persistence of animal populations (Gibbs 1993).
Peat mining may effects on the quality of waters receiving the drainage. Suspended solid
transport from peat mining areas is often higher than from unexploited, natural peat lands
(Kantola et al., 1994).
 Policies or act is important to control such a peat mining. That is because it will give a
negative effect beside can give a huge profit to certain country. However the act is different
depends to country. Recently, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2006.
Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories explain that peat does not qualify as a
biofuel because of the length of time required for peat to re-accumulate after harvest.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2006 Peat mining (large-scale mechanical
harvesting) significantly impacts peat land ecosystems. The reduction of peat affects many
species by removing food for mammals and birds and reducing cover for nesting.

The most effective way of ensuring this is to conserve the remaining peat land forests,
while at the same time rehabilitating degraded peat land. The natural water table regime should
be restored as much possible by improving water management - by reducing drainage or
stopping it altogether, for example by closing drainage canals or erosion gullies by dams
(Wetlands International, 2007).

This can serve to reduce carbon release and preserve their function as carbon sinks and
reservoirs which may contribute to global warming. Peat is conserved also for wise use purpose
to meet human needs and to have sufficient area of peat lands remain to carry out their vital
natural resource functions while satisfying essential requirements of present and future human
generations (IPS and IMCG,2002).

Peat land function as a transition zone between upland and aquatic ecosystems, storing
and attenuating waters between these two zones, and affecting waters passing though them
(Halsey et al. 1997). Peat swaps also plays an important part in stabilizing the ecosystem,
particularly in the control of drainage, microclimate, water purification and soil formation
(Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Malaysia, 2006). Studies examining the
downstream impacts of peat harvesting on water quality have found decreases in pH, alkalinity,
specific conductance, hardness, calcium, and magnesium, and increases in nitrate, turbidity,
suspended solids, total organic carbon, and barium (Clausen and Brooks 1983, Washburn and
Gillis Associates 1983). Because almost all ecosystems have been disturbed to various degrees
by human activity in peat land, it is important to know to what extent these ecosystem regenerate
after the end of disturbance.
 If natural regeneration process fails to reestablish vegetation communities similar to those
present before the disturbance, this indicate that threshold in the regeneration potential have been
crossed and restoration activities are needed. But in most of the cases the ecosystem are totally
destroyed and natural regeneration not take place (Mitsch, 2000).

1.1 OBJECTIVE

• To study about peat mining and conservation in foreign country and it’s relevant to
Malaysia.

2.0 METHOD

In other to achieve our objective, we will find information about peat mining and conservation
from UPMKB library. The books that we want to choose for this case study are regarding peat
soil management, peat soil conservation and peat mining. We also want to search information
from journals that approve by UPM regarding peat swamp and ecosystem, impact of peat
mining, benefits of peat harvesting, current issues regarding peat mining and policies for peat
mining. We also want to interview some lecturers that expert in this field for further information.

3.0 EXPECTED OUTCOME

Learn about the effects of peat mining to ecosystem, the techniques involve in peat conservation
and the important of peat conservation.
4.0 REFERENCES

1. Tranter,D. and H.Tranter. 1997. 'Summing up of evidence presented to the Mining

Warden's Inquiry into renewal of leases to mine peat in Wingecarribee Swamp.' Robertson:
Robertson Environmental Protection Society.
2. W. David Ferguson, Deputy Minister, 2005. Peat mining policy. Department of Natural
Resources, New Brunswick, Canada.
3. Davis, N. and Rose, K. 2008. A Biophysical Inventory and Evaluation of the Lulu Island
Bog, Richmond, British Columbia. Richmond: Richmond Nature Park Society.

4. Bellais, M. 2007. Modelling of the Pyrolysis of Large Wood Particles. Ph. D. Thesis,
97p. Stockholm: KTH-Royal Institute of Technology.

5. IPS (International Peat Society) and IMCG (International Mire Conservation Group).
2002. Statement on the Wise Use of Peatlands.

6. Paavilainen, E. and Paivanen, J. 1995. Peatland Forestry Ecology and Principles. Berlin:
Springer.

7. Schilstra, A. J. 2001. Analysis: How Sustainable is the Use of Peat for Commercial
Energy Production? Journal of Ecological Economics 39: 285-293.

8. Wetlands International. 2007. Peatland Loss Fuels Climate Change: Global Value of
Stopping Peatland Degradation.