Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
With an established framework in place TPS, Toyota was known for its VFM offerings that distinguished themselves from the market due to quality and durability. But in recent times there was a strain on strategic goals of the company to achieve a best fit between quality, customer value and quick growth and profitability. Its marketing mission of offering the best customer experience was lost in race of world auto market dominance. Some of the strategic failures that occurred to the incident are 1. Operations failure: Outsourcing parts assembly: Toyota has always maintained a high level of quality due to its quality testing units but in the process to achieve inorganic growth numbers parts manufacturing was outsourced and then integrated into the final assembly and since the volume of outside engineering grew so high that the quality testing was rendered lower than expected to deliver high volumes across a multitude of different models. Also Toyota was facing the issues of complication of product design, complication of global product mix, complication of production base network, rapid expansion of production volume and other factors, all at the same time. Therefore, Toyotas supply of human resources for quality control might not have been able to tackle all these issues, particularly at overseas bases. Reduction of development time: The development time for new models were reduced heavily to bring out new models in succession and multiple models were manufactured on the same platforms to derive maximum growth. This rapid development cycle led to oversight on placement of failsafes due to which a number of issues like the one under study occurred. 2. Marketing Failure: Toyota never marketed itself as the most quality car manufacturer in the world but due to its processes and external reports its popularity as a quality manufacturer grew. There have been incidents due to assembly/testing failures by other manufacturers also
but the impact on Toyota was maximum due to firstly, the delayed response to the event as Toyota believes in following a structured process to be followed in any event and secondly the inability of the top management to agree that there were shortcomings in the failsafe
mechanisms and that the products will be looked into, one theory is that Toyota had been using ETCS successfully in Japan since at least 2003, without any malfunctions serious enough to become a public issue, so the instant reaction to any problems was that of disbelief. In any case a proper marketing strategy would have upheld the Toyota quality System instead of the current Toyota Quality Myth.
1. http://www.advancebusinessconsulting.com/advance!/strategic-alignment/strategicalignment-business-cases/the-rise-of-toyota.aspx 2. http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/2010-03/08/content_19556981.htm 3. http://www.wiglafjournal.com/communication/2010/06/toyota-%E2%80%94-crisismanagement-at-its-worst/ 4. Impact of Toyota Recall on Corporate Reputation, paper by Michiharu Sakurai (Visiting Professor of Accounting Josai International University Tokyo, Japan) Available at http://www.jiu.ac.jp/books/bulletin/2010/info/sakurai.pdf