Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Background
There has been much debate over the past decade about the future of
newspapers and their potential to not just survive, but thrive in the new
Internet economy. And, while there are still those who believe that “print will
prevail,” the pervasive lack of confidence by investors, and fleeing
advertising dollars to the likes of Craig’s List1 and Yahoo HotJobs2 have
woken up most publishers to the fact that the Internet can either be their
hope for resurrection, or the instrument of their demise, depending on how
they choose (or not) to embrace it.
For some, this revelation is just starting to sink in; for others, it’s been their
mantra for many years. Take, for example, Robert D. Ingle, executive editor
of the San Jose Mercury News. In 1990, years before browsers and Google
ever existed, Ingle proposed an online service called Mercury Center, aimed
at “extending the life and preserving the franchise of the newspaper.”3 Ingle
believed that newspapers needed to “give information to readers however
they wanted it, integrate the print and online operations, and dream up new
forms of advertising.” In the early 90s, Ingle was the darling of the
newspaper and in 1993, the Mercury News launched one of the first
integrated newspaper and online products. Within months other publishers
followed suit, including Gannett, Hearst, Times Mirror and the Tribune Co.
The good news is that, today, for those who have survived, there are proven
strategies, business models and technologies that do work for online
newspapers and can turn what appears to be a bleak future into a promising
new beginning for the newspaper industry.
1
Jupiter Research, March 2007
2
Dow Jones Newswires, April 16, 2007
3
http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/07_45/b4057059.htm?chan=gl
1
Digital Editions – The Best of Both Worlds
In transitioning newspapers from print to online, the most successful
publishers have discovered that the key to their longevity is to give readers
what they want. Sounds simple, but too many publishers offer digital
properties that do little to retain the interest of readers.
Because they were late to the Internet party, many publishers panicked
when creating their web presence and made the mistake of assuming their
print format was inappropriate online. Instead of harmonizing the two worlds,
they abandoned their widely accepted and proven print format for what they
thought online readers would prefer. This was a mistake and resulted in a
proliferation of poorly designed websites that were missing premium content
and were difficult to navigate. And, although newspaper websites attracted
readers, they couldn’t hold their interest for very long. As a result, the
hodgepodge of banner and link ads didn’t generate the revenue newspaper
publishers expected.
Case in point: The New York Times. A typical visitor to nytimes.com spent an
average of just under 35 minutes browsing the site in October 2007 – which
equates to about 68 seconds per day. And as low as that number seems,
it’s actually about 3 times longer than the average of the next nine largest
newspaper sites.4
For years, publishers of successful newspapers just couldn’t figure out the
right formula online. Today, however, more and more publishers recognize
that combining the best of both worlds (print and digital) is the optimal way
to attract and retain readers. They now offer digital replicas of their printed
editions, augmented with Web 2.0 features, and are reaping the rewards of
increased circulation. The reasons are simple:
Some readers save their favorite section for last, savoring it like the last
chocolate chip in a cookie.
Whatever way a person browses the paper, they tend to follow a daily
pattern and enjoy the predictability of the format. The same is true online;
4
American Journalism Review, December/January 2008 online edition
(http://ajr.org/article_printable.asp?id=4427)
2
there is nothing easier to browse than a digital replica of a publication. You
can literally “flip” through the paper at your leisure and uncover stories and
related pictures you weren’t expecting to find. Reading a digital edition online
is fun and entertaining — just as it is with a newsprint edition.
As you browse a digital edition, you also discover which articles the editor
considered “hot” that day – their visual presentation in the paper being
evident by their: location, font size, size and number of pictures, length of
article, use of color, proximity to other stories, and so on. Not only do they
offer added insights to casual readers, digital edition articles can serve as
formal references for business users and researchers.
Digital replicas that are designed with engagement in mind allow readers to
bookmark and post stories on blogs, comment on stories and share articles
through email. They can translate articles on the fly, listen to articles, print
articles or crossword puzzles, search and monitor the printed media, access
back issues, watch embedded videos and interact with advertisers — all
without ever leaving the newspaper.
The digital replica format is a standard for navigation and interaction across
hundreds of publications, regardless of country or language. Whether you’re
reading The Washington Post (US), The Globe and Mail (Canada), Le
Figaro (France), The Times (UK) or Kommersant (Russia), the format is the
same. There is a reason that it has survived over 400 years – it works.
And although the evolution of the digital edition will change over time as
readers’ behaviors and needs evolve, today the interactive digital replica has
proven itself to be most engaging and successful format for newspapers and
magazines on the Internet.
We have seen with nytimes.com that the average time a visitor spends on its
website is about 1 minute a day. Compare that with The Washington Post
digital edition with an average visit time of over 7.5 minutes and the National
Post Digital with a whopping 11 minutes!
3
5) Digital replicas offer multiple revenue opportunities to publishers
Digital editions also offer the best of both worlds in terms of revenue
generation for publishers. Most publishers charge a daily or monthly fee for
their digital editions which supplements their declining print revenues. And
because digital editions count as audited paid circulation, they can attract
new advertising revenues online as well.
Well, like any good product manager, a publisher needs to benchmark the
industry and learn from others’ successes and mistakes. They need to
research what works and what doesn’t. They need to adopt “Best Practices
for Digital Editions” — including: how to buy them, build them, market them
and monetize them.
There are a number of different business models for digital editions and a few
well-established vendors in the market from which publishers can choose.
The key is choosing the right vendor and business model for your needs and
budget.
Some vendors charge a setup fee before you even get started - sometimes it
is for a software license and sometimes it’s just an upfront charge (to get
you comfortable with paying and paying and paying). Some vendors also
charge a “per page” fee (e.g. $3 per page is not unusual), while others
charge a monthly fee of at least $1,000.
All of these models are lucrative for the vendor, but for the publisher it
requires a significant capital investment and represents a high-risk
proposition.
4
So many publishers, such as CanWest (The National Post, Vancouver Sun),
Itronics Limited (The Irish Times) and Associated Newspapers Ltd (Daily Mail
and Evening Standard), to name just a few, are rejecting these vendor-
focused business models and choosing instead to “partner” with their digital
edition service provider.
So you’ve got your digital edition up and running, you’ve built in SEO and
you’ve posted a link on your website, but no one’s coming. Surprised? Well,
you shouldn’t be. Just like with any new product launch, digital editions need
to be properly marketed.
The fundamentals are still the same – you need a plan that covers the 5 “Ps”
of marketing:
• People (Customer) Strategy
• Product Strategy
• Place (Distribution) Strategy
• Promotion Strategy
• Pricing Strategy
Publishers that have invested in “cradle to grave” marketing for their digital
editions have been rewarded with increased ABC circulation and new revenue
opportunities from advertisers who have witnessed the success of these
unique digital properties.
5
Did you know that the number one reason people tend switch from print to a
digital edition is because it is more environmentally friendly? Did you know
the highest valued features are their “ease of use/navigation” and “look and
feel”? Did you know that the page that retains the interest of readers the
longest in most newspapers is the puzzle page?
Knowing what your readers like and how they read the paper is critical,
especially when you are looking to maximize retention and advertising
revenues.
Look for a vendor who offers the tools, technology and reporting capabilities
that can measure reader behavior and provide insights that can help you
continually improve both your print and digital edition versions of your
publication.
6
The Need for XML Processing
A much more efficient way is through a fully automated PDF -> XML
processing and workflow system – i.e. a learning system that uses
Artificial Intelligence to process every page of the publication multiple
times to understand the publication-specific structure and semantics.
Digital edition technology platforms and features must also be tried and
tested with audiences that reflect the needs of a publisher’s subscriber base
before rolling them out to the publisher’s readers. This not only includes new
features and functionality, but user interface enhancements as well,
especially with the wealth of new devices and form factors being continually
offered by computer and mobile device manufacturers.
Look for a vendor who offers an aggregated platform where new digital
features can be prototyped and the results of reader acceptance measured,
before adding them to a publishers’ digital edition.
7
One key capability of digital editions that is often under-appreciated or
blatantly avoided by publishers is the ability to aggregate content from other
sources, whether that content is from other publishers or from the readers
themselves. This is a feature that many publishers are still reluctant to
adopt, perhaps due to their long-standing competitive fears or the perceived
risks of un-moderated content diluting their brand.
With the introduction of digital printing back in the 90s, publishers were able
to reach audiences in new markets all over the world (e.g. hotels, libraries,
cruise ships, retail shops, embassies, etc). Readers could find their favorite
paper in a foreign country if they knew where to look.
Today, the paradigm has changed. Users don’t want to go looking for their
favorite publications — they want the publications to come to them, no
matter where they are and no matter what device they use (e.g. iMac, PC,
laptop, Tablet PC, BlackBerry, iPhone, Windows Mobile devices, etc)
With the plethora of devices out there, publishers need a digital edition that
can run on just about any device. They also need a digital edition that can be
accessed by readers when they’re not online.
Mobility and portability are key distribution factors that must be part of a
publishers “Place” strategy and part of the vendor’s arsenal.
8
Publishers need to let their print subscribers know that they don’t have to
sacrifice anything (other than inky fingers) to go digital. In fact, the message
should not only highlight the benefits of going digital (such as back issue
access, digital features, video,
mobility, audio, etc.), it should
invite readers to join them in
making a commitment to environmental sustainability by saying, “No to
newsprint.”
Successful publishers promote their digital editions in their print edition every
day, providing information on free trials, cool new features and accessibility.
9
and to help them get the most enjoyment out of their online publication.
Almost every digital edition offers free trials to new users – usually 3-7 days.
The key is to follow up with trial users to get their feedback on what they
liked and didn’t like about the experience, and build what you learn into the
next release of the product.
With the advent of new cost per action advertising models in digital editions,
it is anticipated that monthly subscription fees will eventually be phased out
by publishers and the digital editions will be free to registered users. Whether
this is next year or a few years down the road remains to be seen, but being
aware that free online news is inevitable is the first step to planning a
profitable monetization strategy.
5
Inland Cost and Review Study, Inland Press Association
6
Newspaper Association of America, March 15, 2007 press release
10
But there is hope. Local advertisers were expected to spend $7.5 billion on
online media in 20077, a 31% increase over 2006. Newspapers
own 41% of that market8 because ‘local’ is their unique value
proposition and something they do very well. Newspapers
have a strong connection with the local marketplace and play
a critical role in the metropolitan economy, where consumers
spend 80% of their income.9 Google and others are trying to
enter this market, but are struggling – this is where
newspaper publishers have a clear advantage.
Publishers and their partners need to enable online “points of sale” within the
newspaper itself so that readers can transact with advertisers without ever
leaving the newspaper. This will maximize retention of readers and offer
publishers an advertising model that is easy to sell to local advertisers.
Conclusion
Enlightened publishers who have seen the light and are adopting “Best
Practices in Digital Editions” are already reaping the rewards of better reader
engagement, aggregation and new, more lucrative advertising models. Those
still living in dark ages are doing so at their peril.
It’s not too late to “resuscitate the cadavers,” but in today’s fast-paced and
competitive Internet world, publishers need to move quickly and deliver
compelling content and an interactive Web 2.0 environment that readers
demand, while providing high ROI advertising models to local advertisers.
A “wait and see” attitude will lead to the extinction of dinosaurs who still
believe “If I print it, they will come.”
7
Borrell Associates Jun 07
8
Borrell Associates Report on 2006 local online ad revenues
9
Growing local ad spend: Top seven predictions, ZDNet, March 20, 2007
10
What looks like disaster could be opportunity for newspapers, Newspapers and Technology, October 2007, page 34
11