CrystalL.Cox,ProSe 4066249510 POBox2027 PortTownsend,WA98368 SavvyBroker@yahoo.com ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT DISTRICTOFNEVADA 2:12cv02040JADPAL CRYSTALL.COX, Defendant,CounterPlaintiff v. MARCJ.

RANDAZZA,IndividuallyandProfessionally Plaintiffs,CounterDefendant RandazzaLegalGroup,CounterDefendant

CounterComplaint DemandforJuryTrial CauseofAction 1.)Defamation 2.)Harassment 3.)AbuseofProcess 4.)Malpractice 5.)TortiousInterference/InterferencewithBusinessAdvantage 6.)CivilConspiracy 7.)ViolationofFirstAmendmentRights

CounterPlaintiffappearsinthisaction"InPropriaPersona"andasksthatherpointsand authoritiesrelieduponherein,andissuesraisedherein,mustbeaddressed"onthemerits", SandersvUnitedStates,373US1,at16,17(1963)andaddressedwith"clarityand particularity",McCleskeyvZant,111S.Ct.1454,at147071(1991)andafforded"afullandfair" evidentiaryhearing,TownsendvSain,372U.S.293,atp.1(1962).SeealsoPickeringv PennsylvaniaRailroadCo.,151F.2d240(3dCir.1945). PleadingsoftheCounterPlaintiffshallnotbedismissedforlackofformorfailureofprocess.All thepleadingsareasanyreasonableman/womanwouldunderstand,andarewrittentothebest ofCounterPlaintiffsabilityandknowledge. ForcomplaintagainstCounterDefendantMARCJ.RANDAZZA(Randazza),andCounter DefendantRandazzaLegalGroup,CounterPlaintiffCrystalL.CoxAllegesasFollows,Under KnowledgeandBelief

I.INTRODUCTION
1.)OnNov.29th,2011CoxhadaonedaytrialinPortlandORforObsidianV.Cox(CV 110057HA).CoxwasruledtohavenoFirstAmendmentRights,ruledthattheShieldLaw, RetractionLawsandAntiSlapplawsdidnotapplytoCox,thecourtruledthatthiswasdueto herbeingabloggerandnotajournalistassociatedwithanestablishedmedianetwork.Cox lostatTrial,andPlaintiffwasawardeda$2.5millionjudgementagainstCox. 2.)OnDec.6th2011,UCLALawProfessorEugeneVolokhcalledCoxandaskedifCoxwas opentohimrepresentingherProBono(nofeesatall),Coxsaidshewas.ProfessorVolokhhad togetapprovalfromMayerBrowninordertofinalizeacontractwithCox.Thereforeitwasnota 100%yet.Coxremainedopentocounselandwas,atthattimeresearchingProSe representationonherNinthCircuitappeal. 3.)OnDec.10th,2011oneofCoxsanticorruptionbloggersonherblognetwork,Michael Spreadbury,contactedCoxandsaidthathehadbeenincontactwithanattorneynamedMarc Randazza.SpreadburyaskedCoxifshewasopentoaconferencecallwithRandazza,to discusshispossibleProBonorepresentationofCoxinherNinthCircuitAppeal.Thiswasthe firsttimeCoxhadeverheardofMarcRandazzainanyway. OutofrespectforSpreadbury,Coxtookthephonemeeting.OnthiscallRandazzadiscussed Coxscase,herstrategy,theemailsallegingCoxbeinganextortionist,herMTrealestate license,anddiscussedwhetherCoxappealingwasagoodidea.RandazzatoldCoxthatPro Bonowouldcostheramin.of$5000forhisvariousfees. RandazzatoldCoxthatitmaynotbebestforothersifsheappealedObsidianv.Cox.Coxtold Randazzathatshewantedtodowhatwasbestforallbutthatshereallywantedtoappealthe verdictasshefeltthiswasinthebestinterestofallanticorruptionbloggers,citizenjournalists 2

andwhistleblowers.OnthisFirstCallRandazzaaskedCoxtoemailhimallofthefilesonthe case,andallrelateddocumentsofwhichCoxdid.Randazzadidnotcommittorepresentation andknewthattimewasoftheessence.Randazzaclaimedhemayhaveaconflictofinterest withtheMediaBloggersAssociation,andhadtoreviewtherecordtomakesurethatCoxhad preservedtherightlegalargumentsforappeal. AlsoonthisfirstCall,RandazzatoldCoxthatthosehigherupinthePornIndustryhadcontacted himandaskedhimwhathewasgoingtodoabouttheCrystalCoxCase?AsCoxsFirst AmendmentverdictaffectedthePornIndustry.

4.)OnDecember15th2011,VolokhcontactedCoxviaeMailstatingthathehadheardthrough channels,thatRandazzawasCoxsattorney,andhewantedtoconfirmthiswithCoxherself. CoxtoldVolokhthatRandazzahadnotconfirmedtobeCoxsattorney,andCoxhadnotsigned anagreementwithRandazza.CoxandVolokhthenhadaphoneconversationregardingthe representationissue.VolokhtoldCoxthatattorneysoftheFirstAmendmentbarhadtoldhimthat RandazzarepresentedCox.Andthathe,Volokh,hadcalledRandazzatodiscuss/confirmthis representation,ashethoughthewasstillintherunningtorepresentCox,andheoffered Randazzaanysupporthecouldonthismassivelyimportantconstitutionalrightsissue. RandazzatoldVolokhthathewas,indeed,representingCox.Andthathehadputineffort,time andmaterialintothisrepresentation.AndwasinfactworkingonnegotiationswiththeOpposition (DavidAman,TonkonTorpLawFirmandObsidianFinanceGroup). AfterVolokhgotoffthephonewithRandazzahecontactedCoxtoconfirmwhathadhappened andthatRandazzarepresentedCoxandofferedanysupporthecouldbeinthecase. Coxwasupset,andrightlyso,asnotonlyhadCounterDefendantRandazzahadbeen negotiatingwithPlaintiff(Obsidian)onadealofwhichCounterPlaintiffCoxhadneverbeentold thedetailsof,buthehadnocontractwithCox,hadnotcommittedtorepresentation,andwas recklessly,negligentlyinterferingwiththecaseagainstthewishesofwhatheknewCox,the client,wanted.RandazzawasnegotiatingawayinwhichCoxwouldnotgettoappeal,lettingthe clockrunoutonCoxsdeadlinetoappeal,andchasingawayotherFirstAmendmentBar attorneys,allnotinthebestinterestoftheclientnorwhattheclient(Cox)wanted,asRandazza fullyknewperthepriorphoneconference. RandazzaharmedCox,actedunethicallyandviolatedtherightsofCox,actingasherattorney. RandazzascalllyingtoVolokhalmostlostCoxtheattorneyshewanted,andtheappealthat wasinthebestinterestofCoxandbloggerslikeher,aswellasinthebestinterestofsocietyas awhole. AfterRandazzaandVolokhgotoffthephone.RandazzaemailedCoxandsaidthathethoughtit overandwouldrepresentCox.RandazzahadalreadybeenactingasCoxsattorneyand 3

negotiatingagainstthebestinterestofCoxandwhatCoxwantedinherowncase. Cox,thenknowingwhatRandazzahaddonetoharmher,toldMarcRandazzathathewasfired andthatshedidnotwanthisrepresentationandtomakesurethatheknewhedidnotrepresent Coxonanyfurthermatters,andhadnoauthoritytoactonherbehalf.CoxincludedVolokhin theseemails. RandazzaemailedCoxandclaimedhehadnoissue,andsaidtolethimknowifhecouldhelp. HespokeinhighregardofCoxandwhatshedoesonlineandallseemedwell. AsseeninthemediasurroundingCoxsNinthRulingthereisnocasesuchasObsidianv.Cox. ThiscaseisthefirstofitskindinnewmediaandRandazzareallywantedtorepresentCoxand themediaattentionthatwentwithit.Therewasnoprecedentthatgaveequalrightstoall bloggersastothoseoftraditionaljournalistofinstitutionalpresssuchastheNewYorkTimes andForbes.ThisisagroundbreakingcaseandRandazzawasangrythathedidnotgetto representCox,howeverheactedasifhewasfineandspokehighlyofCoxsonlineskills. 5.)January16th,2012,CoxemailedRandazzatoaskifheknowsanyonethatwouldhireher formarketingassheneededtomakemoney.AllCoxwasdoingwasaskingRandazzaifhe knewanyonethatneededmarketing,ashehadpreviouslypraisedherskills. CoxtoldRandazzathatshehadpurchasedMarcRandazza.comwhenshethoughthemight representherasshedoesPRforherowncaseandplannedtopromotethecaseonit,butthat nowthathewouldnotbeherattorneyitcouldbeusedtomarkethimifhewasopentothis.Cox hadnotwrittenawordonablog,norusedthatdomainname. Cox,asastandardofpractice,has,forover10yearspurchaseddomainnamesthathavethe keywordsinthemofthestoriessheiswritingonorpromoting,havinglearnedthisinmassive studyandapplicationofinternetmarketingandsearchengineoptimization.Thedomainname wasnotpurchasedtoextortRandazza,noranyoneelse.Thedomainnamewasnotboughtto intimateRandazzaoranyoneelse.Coxnevermadeanymoneyfromthenamenorusedthe domainnamecommerciallyinanyway. CoxwouldhavegaveRandazzathename,afterhewasnotgoingtobeapartofhercase,had henotbeensothreatening,sooverthetopaggressive.Thisaggression,ontopofwhathedone toattempttosabotageCoxsappeal,Coxdecidedtothenusethedomainnametoreview, parody,speakcriticalofandexposetheunethical,aggressiveactionsofMarcRandazzaand RandazzaLegalGroupinefforttowarnthepublicatlarge. RandazzademandedCoxturnoverthedomain,hethreatenedCoxinmakinganenemyofhim, andhewentintoarage.Coxthendecidedtobuymoredomainnames,andstartmoreblogs speakingcriticalofandreportingonRandazza. AfterthisCoxbegantogettipsfromPornIndustryinsiders,ofwhichCoxalsoposted. 4

6.)Approx.March1,2012,CoxwascontactedbyPornInsider,InvestigativeBloggerMonica FosteraKaAlexandriaMayer(hereafterFoster).FosterwassupportiveofCoxsreportingonthe PornindustryandtoldCoxofherblogs.FromthispointonCoxrepostedinformationfrom Fostersblogsaswell,inefforttosupportvictimsoforganizedcrimeinthepornindustry,human traffickingandthoseseriouslyabusedinthepornindustry.AlsoaroundthistimeCoxwas introducedtoDesiFoxxaKaDianaGrandmason,acertifiedhumantrafficvictimoftheporn industry.Bothhadstalkers,threatsandharassmentfromthoseatandconnectedtoRLG.Foxx isalsoaPornIndustryinsider,investigativebloggerreportingonRandazzaandpornindustry connectionstoorganizedcrime.

7.)OnMarch7th,2012,RandazzabecamesoenragedatnotrepresentingCoxandCox speakingcriticalofhimthathecontactedObsidian(theOpposition)andagreedtoconspirewith themtoconvinceJudgeHernandezandtheworldthatCoxwasguiltyofExtortion.Thoughno criminalcomplaint,notrial,nocauseofaction,noinvestigationandcertainlynoconvictionhad everbeengiventoCoxfortheFelonycrimeofextortion,oranycrime. RandazzahadcontactedTonkonTorpLawFirm,OppositioninCoxscaseandofferedtogive testimonythatwouldsetCoxupforExtortion.Coxrepresentingherselfgotacopyofa SubpoenagiventoRandazzaforadeposition.Randazzaneverattendedthisdepositionand laterclaimedthatCoxhadpurchaseddomainnamesandintimidatedhimasawitness. Randazzaviolatedattorneyclientprivilegeandsoughtextremerevenge,retaliationagainstCox whomhehadprev.actedasherattorneywiththesesameparties. AfterthisJudgeHernandez,convincedCoxwasguiltyofextortion,withoutaninvestigationinto anyevidence,nordueprocessinthecriminaljusticesystem,onlythewordof2attorneysDavid Aman(ObsidiansAttorney)andRandazza(Coxsformerattorney),JudgeHernandezdenied CoxanewtrialandevenreferredtoCoxsextortionactivitiesasiftheywereprovenfactina courtoflawwhichtheywerenot.ExtortionwassimplyanallegationfromDavidAman,Attorney andMarcRandazzaattorneyandhadnofactualevidence,nocourtprocess,noinvestigation andnodueprocessoflawofanykindwithinthecriminaljusticesystem. Afterthis,theNewYorkTimesarticlewentintodetailofhowCoxwasguiltyofextortion.Bigand smallmediaworldwidepickedupthestoryaswell.AndRandazzacontinuedtopostandspread falseanddefamatorystatementsagainstCounterPlaintiffCox,withactualmaliceashehad personalandprofessionalknowledgeofthefacts. 8.)OnoraroundMarch12th,2012,CoxpurchasedJenniferRandazza.com,asCoxhadseen ablogpostonRandazzasblogwithaliquordrinkandthewordswherebabiescomefrom underit,theposttalkedofknockingupJenniferonaDrunkenTryst.Randazza,aselfprofessed expertindomainnamesdidnotownthenameandatthattimeRandazzawasonFoxNewsand 5

CNNstickingupforRushLimbaughcallingSandraFlukeaSlut.Coxusedthedomainname alongwithotherstoexposeRandazzaforbeinghypocritical,andtomakefunofRandazzaand hiswife. CoxboughtthedomainnameoftheirdaughtertopokefunatRandazza,andprovethathewas notwhatheclaimedtobeasadomainnameexpertattorney.Coxneverhadablognorposted anythingonthedomainname,thoughitislegaltodosoandCoxsfreespeechright.Coxsimply boughtthedomainnametostandupto,andpokefunatRandazza. CoxpurchaseMarcRandazza.metofurtherpokefunatthe,overthetopanger,Randazzawas displayingeventhoughhedefendstherightsofotherstospeackcritical,callnames,parod,poke funandevendefendedtheownerofGlenBeckRapedandMurderedAyoungGirlin1990.com. CurrentlyRandazzaisdefendingKateGosselinsrighttoprivacyinemailsandpersonalrecords whileatthesametimepubliclyhumiliated,defaming,andruiningthelifeofCounterPlaintiffCox withherprivateemailsandusingfalsesubpoenastogetCoxsprivateinformation. CoxneverofferedtosellMarcRandazzaadomainname,norremoveanycontentforafeeof anykind.Randazzaclaimingthistomedia,perjuringcourtdocumentsstatingCoxextortinghim andstatinginworldwidepublicationsthatCoxisanExtortionisthasruinedCoxslife,putCox undermassiveconstantduress,lostCoxclients,incomeandtheabilitytoevenrentahome. Coxcurrentlylivesinchurchhousing. CounterPlaintiffCoxsimplystooduptoRandazzaandhehasusedhispowerandinfluence overthemedia,lawbloggersandthecourtstopaintCoxoutasevil,acriminal,aliar,someone whoattacksa3yearoldandcontinuestolieandtormentCoxtothisday. 9.)Approx.March30th,2012,CounterPlaintiffMarcRandazzabeganpublishingfalseand defamatorystatementsconcerningPlaintiffCrystalCox,attackinga3yearoldonlineandbeing guiltyofextortion.KashmirHillofForbestheninterviewed,spokewithCounterDefendant Randazzaandpublishedthesesamefalseanddefamatorystatementstoathirdparty concerningCounterPlaintiffCrystalCox.

10.)OnApril2nd2012,KashmirHill,Forbesbeganpublishingfalseanddefamatory statementstoathirdpartyconcerningPlaintiffCrystalCox,attackinga3yearold,viathefalse anddefamatorystatementsofCounterDefendantRandazza.CounterPlaintiffCoxhadnoblog abouta3yearold,madenostatementsonlineaboutthisthreeyearold,yetKashmirHill knowinglypostedfalseanddefamatoryinformationregardingCox. JordanRushie,MulvihillandRushieLLCpublishedfalseanddefamatorystatementstoathird partyconcerningCox,inanarticleonPhillyLawBlow,byJordanRushie,Titled"TheEvolution ofCrystalCox:AnatomyofaScammer",dated,April3rd2012.JordanRushiepostedfalseand 6

defamatorystatementsregardingCoxbeingguiltyofextortionandattackingathreeyearold. OnApril6th2012,BobGarfield,NPRinterviewedCounterDefendantMarcRandazzaonNew YorkPublicRadio.TheshowwascalledCOMBATING"BAD"SPEECHWITHMORE SPEECH,Dated,April06,2012.BobGarfieldandCounterDefendantRandazzastatedfalse anddefamatory,slanderousstatementstoathirdpartyconcerningCounterPlaintiffCox. BobGarfieldandDefendantMarcRandazza,withactualmaliceandknowledgeofthefacts, accusedCounterPlaintiffCoxofattackingachildonline,ofbeingguiltyofextortion,andall mannerofunethicalandcriminalactivity.Thesefalseanddefamatorystatementstoathird partyconcerningCounterPlaintiffCoxinthisworldwidemediumofcommunicationhascaused Coximmeasurable,irreparabledamage,andessentialsetCoxslifetoruin. PopeHatArticleApril6th,2012.Randazzagetsallhislawyerfriends,toganguponCoxand paintherinfalselight.Whichcontinuestotheday. 11.)4142012RandazzafilesProtectiveOrderAgainstCoxinLasVegasCourts. 12.)MidApril2012,CoxgaveMarcRandazza.com,JenniferRandazza.comand NataliaRandazza.comtopornindustryinsiderinvestigativebloggerMonicaFostertofurtherher effortsinprotectingchildren,helpinghumantraffickingvictims,givingvoicetothoseconnected toRandazzathatwerebeingthreatenedstalkedandharassed,andtoreportonorganizedcrime inthepornindustry. AfterthisRandazza,triedtosetFosterupforExtortion.Randazzapressuredher,bulliedher. Randazza,throughconnectionsinsideofGodaddy,stoleJenniferRandazza.comoutofFosters account.RandazzapostedextremehateonlineagainstFoster,herChristianbelief,andwished herdeath.Healsodoveintopersonalinformation,gotthenameandmakeofhercarandposted thisinthreats.Thereafter,FosterwasinfearofherlifeandtoldCoxsheneededtogetridofthe domainnamesleft.Coxtookthenamesback,CoximmediatelydeletedNataliaRandazza.com andbeganpostingonMarcRandazza.com. 13.)4272012RandazzaworkswithTonkonTorptohelpthemattempttoseizedomain names,RandazzarecommendsreceiverLaraPearson,ashehadpreviouslyusedherinthe Righthavencase.RandazzaadvisedattorneyDavidAmantouseLaraPearsonasareceiverto comeforCoxsassetsasRandazzahadworkedwithherbeforeintheRighthavencase 14.)OnJun18th2012,DefendantMarcRandazzafiledaCzechcourtcomplaintagainstCox andEliotBernstein,toinitiateadomainnamedispute.Inthiscase,CounterDefendant RandazzastatedfalseanddefamatorystatementstoathirdpartyconcerningCoxandEliot Bernstein.RandazzausedKashmirHillofForbes,LawyerJordanRushieandNewYorkTiems DavidCarrsfalseanddefamatorystatementsashisevidencetostealtheintellectualpropertyof PlaintiffCox. 7

15.)OnJuly27th2012,DefendantMarcRandazzafiledaWIPOcomplaintagainstPlaintiffCox andEliotBernstein,toinitiateadomainnamedispute,andwithnofilingfee.Inthiscase,Counter DefendantRandazzastatedfalseanddefamatorystatementstoathirdpartyconcerningCox andBernsteinandaccusedthembothofthefelonycrimeofextortion,withoutfilingcriminal charges,simplyuseshispowerandinfluenceasanattorneytostatetheallegationsasfact. CounterDefendantMarcRandazzausedKashmirHill,JordanRushieandDavidCarrsfalse anddefamatorystatementsashisevidencetostealtheintellectualpropertyofCoxand Bernstein,andwithnoFirstAmendmentAdjudication. 16.)OnNovember,28,2012CounterDefendantMarcRandazzafiledalegalaction,a vengeful,defamatorySLAPPsuit,againstCounterPlaintiffCoxintheDistrictofNevada.Inthis legalactionRandazza,Coxsformerattorney,statedthatPlaintiffCoxhadextortedhimandgave thefalseanddefamatorystatementsofDefendantsashisevidence. Randazzadidnotfilecriminalchargeswiththeauthorities.NordidCounterDefendant Randazzafilechargeswiththeattorneygeneraloranyotherbodyofauthority,regardinghis allegationsthatCoxandBernsteinhadextortedhim,wasguiltyofextortionorhadbeeninaprior casewhereCoxwasfoundguiltyofextortion,orevenunderinvestigationforextortion. RandazzaliedtotheDistrictofNevadastatingthathehadaTrademarkatthattime,whichhe didnot.RandazzausedaTROtotakemassiveamountsofintellectualpropertyandshutdown speechwithnofirstamendmentadjudicationordueprocess. ThedomainnamesinthesuitwereseizedandgiventoRandazza,whichisnotstandardof practice,usuallydomainsinacasesuchasthisarefrozenintheaccounttheyarein,untilthe disputeisover.RandazzausedCoxsproprietarysearchengineskillsagainstherown reputationandbusinessbyredirectingCoxsintellectualpropertytoablogpostonhislawblog thatpostedfalseanddefamatorystatementsagainstCox. ThishascausedCoxirreparableharm,suffering,andlossofbusiness,family,friends,and qualityoflifefor16monthsandcounting.

17.)OnNov.30th2011,Attorney,INTAcolleagueofCounterDefendantRandazzaPeterL. Michaelson,SoleWIPOPanelist,publishedfalseanddefamatorystatementstoathirdparty concerningCounterPlaintiffCoxandEliotBernsteininaWIPOpublication,whichhasa widespread,internationalreaderbase. PeterL.MichaelsonquotedNewYorkTimesDavidCarrsdefamatoryandfalsestatements madetoathirdpartyconcerningCounterPlaintiffCoxandusedCarrandHillsfalseand defamatorystatementasevidenceagainstCoxinseizingdomainnamesbelongingtoCoxand 8

toEliotBernstein,iViewitInventor. PeterL.MichaelsontookthestatedwordofCounterDefendantMarcRandazzawithno adjudicationforthecrimeofextortionordueprocessandpublishedthesefalseanddefamatory statementstoathirdparty. AfterPeterL.MichaelsonsfalseanddefamatorystatementstoathirdpartyconcerningCounter PlaintiffCoxandEliotBernsteinwerepublishedinanInternationalWIPOpublication,Counter DefendantMarcRandazzaviahisattorneyRonaldD.GreenofRandazzaLegalGroupused thesefalseanddefamatorystatementstoathirdpartyconcerningCoxandBernsteintofurther harm,harass,defameandretaliateagainstCounterPlaintiffCoxandBernstein. RandazzausedtheWIPOdecisionasevidenceinhisDistrictofNevadacaseagainstCoxand Bernsteinthattheywereguiltyofextortion,wheninfactRandazzahasstatedthosewordsto WIPOandtheyweretakenfalselyasfacts,orevidenceoflaw. ThisWIPOpublicationthenbecameofficialevidenceandallegedproofinCounterDefendant RandazzascaseagainstPlaintiffCoxandEliotBernstein(DistrictofNevadaCase 2:12cv02040GMNPAL). JudgeGloriaNavarrousedtheevidence,legalcommentaryandsloughoffalseand defamatorystatementsfromRandazza,asjustificationtogivemassivedomainnamesand intellectualpropertytoRandazzainapreliminaryinjunction.Thiswipedoutthousandsoflinks, wipedoutthesearchenginerankingofPlaintiffCox,deletedmassiveamountsofcontentthat Coxhadcreatedonline,anddamagedCoxsintellectualproperty,business,reputationand onlinemedia.AswellasusedCoxshardworkforRandazzatocommercialgain,getnew clients,keepclientsandstealCoxstrafficanddirecttohiscommercialbusiness,hislawfirm. Thisactionalsoremovedblogsthatreportedonorganizedcrimeinthepornindustry,blogs speakingcriticalofRandazzaandthepornindustryandblogsexposingthepornindustrys unlicenseduseofEliotBernsteinsvideocodingtechnology,iViewit. ThepreliminaryinjunctionandredirectingCoxsblogstoRandazzacausedabacklashof defamation,harassment,retaliationandlossofreputation,clients,friendsandfamily,and causedserious,irreparableharmtoCounterPlaintiffCox. 18.)November302012Randazzav.CoxWIPOArbitrationDecisionPostonRandazzaBlog, AttackingCoxandaccusingCoxofExtortion,yetagain. 19.)December2012,Uponknowledgeandbelief,RandazzaadvisedTonkonTorpLawyer DavidAman,counselforObsidianFinanceGrouponhowtoSTOPCoxfromappealingtothe NinthCircuit.Coxhadnocounselintheareaofherassets,andtheexecutionofher2.5Million dollarjudgement.CounterDefendantRandazzaandattorneyDavidAmanconspiredtofile 9

documentswiththeMultnomahCountySheriffsOffice(Portland,OR)toseizeandauctionoff CoxsrighttoappealObsidianv.Cox.ThedocumentsstatedthatCoxsrighttoappealherNinth CircuitcasewouldbeSOLDtothehighestbiddertopayoffher$2.5MillionDollarJudgement owedtoObsidian.Coxsappealwasalreadywellunderway.Coxcontactedherappealattorney EugeneVolokhandhegotapprovaltorepresentCoxonthematter.(Asseenindocument numbers144and145ofObsidianv.Cox,Dist.ofOregon) 20.)Allof2013,RandazzafiledmotionsincourtsharassingCox,participatedinhateand defamationcampaigns,interviewedinbigandsmallmediaandstatedfalseanddefamatory information,threatenedandintimidatedCox,harassedCoxssourcesinsidethepornindustry, emailedmanyindividualsandbusinessattemptingtogetotherstoaccuseCoxofextortionand joinhishateanddefamationcampaignagainstCox. Coxreceivedthreateningtexts,onlinehate,taunting,andconstantduressforthoseconnectedto Randazza. 21.)OnJanuary27th2014,RandazzaLegalGroup(RLG)issuedasubpoenatoGodaddy,the NoticeofSubpoenawasDistrictofNevada,andsignedbyLawClerkatRLG,signaturecannot bemadeout,andnoprintedname.TheactualsubpoenatoGodaddysaidDistrictofArizonaon thedocuments,andstatedthataC.DeRoseat5131N.40thSt,A310,PhoenixAZwould examineallfinancialdata,electronicallystoredinformation,billingdata,IPdata,serverdata,all phonenumbers,andcontactofanyoneassociatedwithaccountsortothespecifiedpeoplethat Randazzawantedpersonal,financialandintellectualpropertyinformationontobeexaminedon Feb.7th,2014.TheExhibittothissubpoenawasaDistrictofNevadadocumentstatingfurther persona,private,andfinancialdatathatRLGwascommandingthatGodaddyturnovertothem inregardtoCrystalCox. ThisSubpoenagaveRLGaccesstotheprivateandfinancialinformationofpornindustry insiders,whistleblowerssuchasMonicaFosterandDianaGrandmason,bothexposingRLG andtheirconnectionstoOrganizedCrimeinthePornIndustry,prostitutionforcedonporn actors,pedophilesconnectedtoRLGandtheactivitiesoftheFreeSpeechCoalitionandRLGto movethepornindustrytoLasVegas. ThisSubpoenaalsogaveRLGaccesstotheprivatedataandfinancialinformationofiViewit inventorEliotBernstein,ofwhichisaninventorCoxhasbeenreportingonforover4years. OveraDecadeagoiViewitTechnologyinventedavideocodingtechnologythatchanged pixelatedvideotoclearcrispvideo.CounterdefendantRandazzasclientsmakebillionsayear offofthistechnology,inwhichtheyinfringeon.

10

22.)OnJanuary27th2014,RandazzaLegalGroup(RLG)issuedaDistrictofNevada subpoenatoVerizonWireless,theactualSubpoenaisDistrictofNorthernTexas,thissubpoena commandsVerizon,thoughKlemchukKubastaLLP8150N.CentralExpressway,10thFloor Dallas,TXtobeallowedtoinspectdocumentsrequestedonFebruary10th,2014. TheExhibittothesubpoena,aDistrictofNevadadocumentCOMMANDINGthatVerizongive CounterDefendantRandazza,Coxspersonalprivateinformation,phonenumbers,personal calls,businesscalls,billingandpaymentinformation,datathatbreachestheprivacyof countlessindividualsandcompanies,lawyers,media,clients,customer,andfriendsofCox. ThissubpoenaalsogaveRandazzaaccesstophonenumbersanddataofsourceswhomhad toldCoxofissuesoforganizedcrime,prostitutionandmoreinwhichCoxwasreportingon connectedtoRLG,theFreeSpeechCoalitionandtheOrganizedCrimeinPorn.Including delicateandprivateinformation,texts,phonenumbers,contactsofthosewhohavebeen threatenedbyRLGandconnections.TheSubpoenaalsorequestedallothernumbersonthe accounttherebyunjustlydataminingCoxsfamily,friend,businesspartners,andpersonal relationships. TheSubpoenaalsoallowedRLGtoaccesswhomayhelpCoxpayherbills,orhelphertohave aphone.AsCoxhasnomoney,nohomeandispennilessduetotherelentlessactionsofCox. ThiscompromisestheprivateinformationofthosehelpingCoxtohavealifeline,aphone.This couldalsogiveRLGaccesstowhereCoxislocatedatalltimesandasCounterPlaintiffCox hasstatedmanytimesinthiscase,Coxslifeisindanger,underconstantduressandthreatsby thoseinthepornindustryconnectedtoRandazzaandthisispotentiallylifeordeathtoCoxand hersources. CoxclaimsRandazzaissuedafalseinstrument,impersonatedaSubpoenaandhascaused Coxandthoseconnectedtoherirreparableharm.

23.)OnFeb.2,2014CounterDefendantRandazzafiledanAmicusBriefintheNinthCircuit CourtofappealstoattempttoconvincetheNinthCircuitpanelinaciviltrialdefamationcase, (Obsidianv.Cox)thatCounterPlaintiffCoxisacriminal. RandazzaflatoutliedstatingCoxisanExtortionistinsworndocumentstotheNinthCircuit. RandazzastatesthatCoxextortedhim,yetRandazzaneverfiledacriminalcomplaintina properjurisdictionandvenue,instead,abusinghispowerandprivilegeasanattorneyRandazza usescivilcourts,WIPO,andmassmediatoframeCox,paintCoxinfalselight,andmakeCox lookguiltyofthecrimeofextortionwithoutallowingCoxdueprocessoflawwithintheCriminal JusticeSystem,orCoxhavingaCriminalattorneyappointedtoher. Inthis9thCircuitAmicusRandazzausedhisruling,viahisownwords,inthiscourt(Districtof 11

Nevada,Randazzav.CoxandBernstein)regardinganunconstitutionalTRO,andhiswordsina WIPOcomplaintbothagainstCoxandEliotBernstein,statingthiswasevidencethatCoxhad beenadjudicatedandfoundguiltyofthecrimeofextortion. Coxhasneverbeenontrialforextortion,underinvestigationforextortion,adjudicatedfor extortionorconvictedofextortion. RandazzaalsousedashisallegedevidenceinhisNinthCircuitamicusstatingCoxisan Extortionist,aMTrealestateboardhearingproposalregardingacomplaintagainstCox regardingMTagencylaw(realestaterepresentationlaws)andhavingnothingtodowith extortion.TheproposalwasdatedJuly5th2013,andwasapreliminaryhearingdocument. TheHearinginthisMatter,astherecordshowswasNov.21st,2013,Randazzadidnotinclude updateddocumentationasthatdidnotsupporthisfalseallegations.Randazzadeliberatelyused apreliminaryTRO,aWIPODecisionandanunadjudicatedrulingtocauseCoxfurther irreparabledamage,andwithactualmaliceandknowledgeofthefacts. January15th,2014wastheAdjudicationHearinginthismatter,Coxcouldnotattendanyhearing onthematteroutoflackofmoney,transportationandfearforherlife. CoxwasnotalicensedRealEstateBrokerintheStateofMontanaasofOctober2013dueto lossofherhome,andextremeduress.CoxnowhasarealestatefirmintheStateof WashingtonasofApril2013. OnFeb.4th,DonHarris,SpecialAssistantAttorneyGeneral,DepartmentofLaborandIndustry fortheStateofMontana,emailedCoxandaffirmedthatCoxwasnotunderreviewordisciplined inanywayforcommittingthecriminaloffenseofextortion. OnFeb.8th,2014theFinalOrderwasissuedinthisMontanaRealEstateagency,noncriminal matterandCoxwasfined$1000,given6monthssuspensionand8hoursofethicsclassesas herdisciplinaryaction.ThiscasewasnotcriminalandNOTHINGtodowithextortion.

24.)OnFebruary13thRLGAdmittedtoCoxthefollowing:
Feb13at6:23PM UponfurtherreviewofthesubpoenasissuedtoGoDaddy,werealizethattheywerenotproperly issued.PursuanttoDecember2013changestotheFederalRulesofCivilProcedure,the subpoenasshouldhavebeenissuedfromtheUnitedStatesDistrictCourtfortheDistrictofNevada andnottheDistrictofArizona.(SeeFed.R.Civ.P.45(a)(2).)Accordingly,wewithdrawthe subpoenas. __________________________________ Ronald D. Green, Jr. Randazza Legal Group

12

TherebyadmittingthatRandazzaLegalGroup,licensedinArizonaaswellasNevada,and havingSuperiorKnowledgeoftheLaw,hadusedafalseinstrument,aforgeddocumentpersay thatwasnotproperlyissuedinordertogainprivateinformationofCox,MonicaFoster,Diana Grandmason,EliotBernsteinandothercontacts,friends,clientsandbusinessassociatesof CounterPlaintiffCox. 25.)OnFeb.13th,2014RandazzaisincommunicationwithStephenLamont,amanwhois involvedintheiViewitTechnologypatentthefts,StephenLamonthaspreviouslythreatenedCox thatshehadbettergetheraffairsinorderwhileshestillcan.AndisinvolvedinongoingFBI, DOJ,USPTOandSECinvestigationsregardingthestoleniViewitTechnology.Aswellasnamed infederalRICOandRacketeeringcasesregardingtheiViewitTechnologyandinventorEliot Bernstein. ItappearsthatRandazzahasbeenincommunicationwithLamontsinceFeb.23rdof2013. RandazzaclearlyattemptedtogetLamonttoclaimthatCoxextortedhim,askedformoneyfrom him.RandazzaofferstorepresentLamontforFREEifhewillgoafterCoxinacybersquatting lawsuit. LamontadmitstohelpingRandazzatobankruptcyEliotBernstein. LamonthasnoactingauthorityiniViewit,yetcontinuestoactagainstiViewitshareholders. RandazzaisconspiringwithLamonttoretaliateandharassCounterPlaintiffCoxandEliot Bernstein. InRandazzascommunicationswithLamonthedigsintoprivatefamilymatters,trusts,iViewit technologyfinancialinformation,andtheprivatelifeandbusinessesofEliotBernstein. AllofwhichareunderinvestigationwiththePalmBeachCountySheriff'sOffice,underthe FinancialCrimesUnit,SpecialInvestigationsDivision,DetectiveRyanMiller,forfraud,forgery andpossiblemurderintheSimonBernsteinandShirleyBernsteinEstatecasewhichinvolves sharesofiViewit.

THEPARTIES
26.)CounterclaiminvolvesCoConspirators,butislimitedtoMarcJ.RandazzaandRandazza LegalGroupasperOrderGrantingCoxpermissiontocounterclaimagainstMarcRandazza Only.CoxhasNOClaimsregardinganyotherRandazzafamilymemberotherthanMarcJ. Randazza.

13

ALLEGATIONSCOMMONTOALLCOUNTS
27.)CounterPlaintiffCoxisanInvestigativeBloggerhavingover1200blogsandhasbeen reportingoncorruptionforapprox.9years.Coxhasdedicatedherlifetogivingvoicetovictimsof corruptionwhohavenootherwaytobeheard.Coxisanationallynotedanticorruptionblogger andwhistleblower. 28.)Coxhasownedherownrealestatefirmsince2000inmultiplestates.Andhasbeena successfulinternetmarketingfornutritionalsupplementsforover8years. 29.)MarcRandazzahasharassed,defamed,tauntedthreatenedandviolatedtherightsofCox sinceDec.10th2011,justafterCoxstrialObsidianv.Cox. 30.)CounterPlaintiffCoxhasneverpostedanyblogpostreportingoncorruptiontoseeka paymenttoremovesuchpost.Coxhasneverbuiltablognorpostedonablogatanytimeto lateraskRandazzaoranyoneelseshereportsonformoney,atanytime. Coxhasneversoughttogaincommerciallynormakeaprofitofanykindforanydomainname, facebookpage,newsrelease,blogorwebpostregardingRandazzaoranyoneelse. Coxhasneverpostedanythingonlineorboughtadomainname,evertointimidateanyonefrom nottestifyingorforanyotherreason. RandazzahasliedaboutCox,paintedCoxinfalselight,gangedupwithotherstopaintCoxout asanextortionistandhasneverfiledacriminalcomplaintandgaveCoxdueprocess,though RandazzahassuperiorknowledgeofthelawandknowsthatifhefeltCoxwasguiltyofthe felonycrimeofextortionthatRandazzashouldcontactthepolice,theFBIorotherauthorities. InsteadRandazzausedhispowerandinfluenceoverthemedia,theINTA,WIPO,lawbloggers, Forbes,NPRandthiscourttopaintCoxouttobeacriminalguiltyofthefelonycrimeofextortion. 31.)CounterDefendantRandazzahasahistoryofshakedownstogetlitigantstodowhathe wishes.Randazzasueslitigantstoshutdownblogs,hasbeencalledacopyrighttroll,suesand thenforceshislegalfeestobepaidandhasahistoryofusingmediaandlegalbloggersto createthepicturethathistarget(litiganthesues)isguiltyandthereforeforcethemintosettling andforceshisoutrageousattorneyfeestobepaidviacourtorder.Which,notablyhashappened inseveralcaseswherebyJudgeGloriaNavarrowasthepresidingJudge.(Note:Respectfully, CoxhasnamedNavorroinlegalactionandhasbeendenied.Coxintendstofilealienagainst NavarrosbondinthiscourtfortheharmshehasknowinglycausedCoxinfavorofRandazza LegalGroup) 32.)CounterPlaintiffCoxhasdozensofblogs,facebookpages,onlinereportsandoutletsto reportonCounterDefendantRandazzaandRLGinordertowarnthepublicatlargeoftheir scams,connectionstoknownpedophilessuchasKurtBrackob/Treptow,workwiththeFree 14

SpeechCoalitiontosilencewhistleblowersandporninsidersregardingmovingthepornindustry toLasVegasandencouragingviolationsofCalOSHA. 33.)CounterDefendantRandazzahastargetedEliotBernstein,iViewitinventor,avictimofcourt andattorneycorruptionofwhomCoxhasreportedonforover4years. 34.)CounterDefendantRandazzahastargetedMonicaFosteraKaAlexandrianMayer,whoisa pornindustryinsider,awhistleblower,aninvestigativebloggerandhasbeenstalked, threatened,andunderextremeduressbyRandazzaandthoseconnectedtoRandazzafor years. 35.)CounterDefendantRandazzahastargetedDesiFoxxaKaDianaGrandmasonwhoisa pornindustryinsider,awhistleblower,aninvestigativeblogger,acertifiedhumantrafficking victimsandhasbeenstalked,threatened,andunderextremeduressbyRandazzaandthose connectedtoRandazzaforyears. 36.)CounterDefendantRandazzahasbeenouttosabotageCoxsninthcircuitappealsince Dec.2011 37.)CounterDefendantRandazzahassoughtrevengeconstantlyforCoxchoosingUCLALaw ProfessorEugeneVolokhoverRandazzainherNinthCircuitappeal, 38.)Coxhasbeenunabletoobtaincounselinthismatter,unabletoreceiveprotectiveorders, unabletoenjointheattorneygeneralandhaslostallrightstoelectronicfilingwhichhascauseda greathardshipindefendinginthismatter.

CauseofAction
AlliswrittenuponknowledgeandbeliefofCounterPlaintiffCrystalCox

FirstCauseofAction
U.S.CodeTitle284101/28:1332DiversityLibel,Assault, Slander320Assault,Libel,andSlander 39.)CounterPlaintiffCoxreallegesalloftheproceedingparagraphs,andfullyincorporatesthe allegationsaboveandincorporatesallexhibits,motions,andpleadingsshehaspreviously enteredintothiscase. 40.)CounterDefendantRandazzahasknowingly,withactualmalice,publishedfalseand defamatorystatementstothirdpartiesregardingCox.

15

41.)CounterPlaintiffCoxhassufferedirreparabledamageregardingthesemaliciouslyfalseand defamatorystatementstomultiplethirdpartiesover2years. 42.)CounterDefendantRandazzashouldbepermanentlyenjoinedfrompublishingfurtherfalse anddefamatorystatementsregardingCounterPlaintiffCox. 43.)CounterDefendantRandazzausedprivilegedinformationagainstCoxtoDefameand SlanderCox,aswellasattempttoSabotageCoxsninthcircuitappealandpaintCoxoutasa Criminalinregardingtoproceedingsofaciviltrial. 44.)RandazzahasusedForbes,NPR,LegalBloggers,hisLawFirmsBlogs,WIPO Publications,AmicusBriefs,CourtFilings,andmoretoDefame,Slander,harassandintimidate Cox. 45.)Randazzahasrelentlesslyconspiredtogetotherstojoinhiminpaintinghisformerclient, Cox,outtobeacriminalguiltyofextortionwithoutfilingacriminalcomplaint. 46.)Randazzasthreats,actionsandandganginguponCoxwithvariousothershaskeptCoxin constantduress,infearofherlife,unabletohirecounsel,unabletorentahomeandunder constantattackforover2years.Coxhassufferedirreparabledamage.

SecondCauseofAction
Harassment/18U.S.Code1514/18U.S.C.2261A/ 18U.S.C.section2425

47.)CounterPlaintiffCoxreallegesalloftheproceedingparagraphs,andfullyincorporatesthe allegationsaboveandincorporatesallexhibits,motions,andpleadingsshehaspreviously 48.)Randazzahasconspiredtocommitinterstatestalkingandconspiracytousea telecommunicationsdevicetoabuse,threaten,stalkandharassCounterPlaintiffCox.918 U.S.C.2261A(stalking)and47U.S.C.223(a)(1)(c)(telecommunications abuse/threat/harass) 49.)RandazzahasengagedinCyberbullying,Threats,connectedtotextthreatstoCox,blogs promotinghateagainstCox,andconstantlybullying,threateningandharassingCox. (18U.S.C.section2425) 50.)RandazzasharassmentofCounterPlaintiffCoxhascausedCoxirreparableharmofwhich Coxisentitledtocompensation.

ThirdCauseofAction
16

AllrelatedAbuseofProcessLaws/28U.S.Code2680/ 51.)CounterPlaintiffCoxreallegesalloftheproceedingparagraphs 52.)Randazzaabusedhispowerandprivilegeasanattorney,asanofficerofthecourttostalk, harass,subpoena,intimidate,conspirewithothers,gangstalk,threaten,bully,andcoerce CounterPlaintiffCox. 53.)Randazzamaliciouslyanddeliberatelymisusedhispowerandperversionofregularly issuedcourtprocess,tocauseirreparableharmtoCox 54.)Randazzafiledcourtdocuments,usedsubpoenas,contactedprivateparties,used confidentialinformation,usedfalseinstrumentsandsubpoenasforulteriorpurposeforwhichit wasnotdesignedfor,inordertocausedeliberateandmaliciousharmtoCox. 55.)Randazzacommittedapurposeful,maliciousandwillfulactintheuseofprocesswhich wasnotproperintheregularconductoftheproceeding. 56.)RandazzausedthejudicialprocesstoextortorcoercecounterPlaintiffCoxandforceherto shutdownheronlinespeechwhichspokecriticalofhim,exposedorganizedcrimeintheporn industry,madefunofhimandreviewedhislawfirm. 57.)Randazzacontemplated,plotted,andorchestratedtheseactionsforulteriormotivesand misusedhispowerofthecourtandjudicialprocess. 58.)RandazzahasusedthejudicialprocessforillegitimatepurposesofshuttingdownCoxs speech,parodyblogs,reviewblogs,anticorruptionblogs,allbeforeFirstAmendment adjudicationandhavingSUPERIORknowledgeofFreeSpeechlawsandFirstAmendment Rights. 59.)CounterDefendantRandazzasusedthecourtprocessforhisownpersonalgainof shuttingdownspeech,takingintellectualpropertythatcompetedwithhiminthesearchengines andintimidatingCox,aswellaspaintingCoxouttobeaCriminal,hascausedCoxirreparable damage.CoxisallowedallReliefallowedbylaw.

FourthCauseofAction
Attorney/LegalMalpractice,Negligence/38U.S.Code7316/10U.S.Code1054 Note:ProSeCoxisunsurewhichU.S.CodeisinvolvedinAttorney/LegalMalpractice, andherebyenactsanyandalllawsrelatedtoattorneyclientprivilege,attorneyabuse,neglect andmalpractice. 60.)CounterPlaintiffCoxreallegesalloftheproceedingparagraphs,andfullyincorporatesthe 17

allegationsabove 61.)CounterDefendantRandazzausedprivilegedinformationhegainedfromCoxactingasher attorney,toconspirewiththeoppositionandharmCox,topaintCoxinfalselightandtocause Coxirreparabledamage. 62.)RandazzadeceivedCoxintothinkinghewastrustworthy,wheninfactRandazzawastrying tosabotageCoxsninthcircuitappeal,helpoppositiontostealCoxsappeal,defameand discreditCoxandandusehisattorney/clientprivilegedirectlyagainstCoxinmultipleways, therebycausingCoxirreparabledamageofwhichCoxisisentitledrelief. 63.)Randazzahasrefused,andthiscourthasruledthatCoxisnotentitledtoknowthenameof RandazzasliabilitycarrierforhimpersonallyasanattorneyandhislawfirmRandazzaLegal Group. 64.)RandazzausedhisattorneyconnectionswithCoxtoattempttochaseoffotherlawyers, stalltimeforCoxtofileherninthcircuitappeal,lietootherattorneysofhisrepresentationofCox andtoviolatetherightsofCox. 65.)RandazzasuedCoxintheDistrictofNevadatoshutdownCoxsblogsthatspokecriticalof him,thoughRandazzaisahugesupporterofthosewhohaveblogsspeakingcriticalofothers. RandazzagavefalseinformationtothiscourtinwhichresultinginanunconstitutionalTROin whichshutdownCoxsintellectualpropertyandonlinespeechwithnoFirstAmendment adjudication,thishascausedcausedCoxirreparableharm. 66.)CoxhasnowaytodefendherselfagainstherformerattorneyCounterDefendantMarc Randazza,andhasthusbeenundermassiveandconstantduressfor2yearsandcounting.

FifthCauseofAction
TortiousInterference/InterferencewithBusinessAdvantage 67.)CounterPlaintiffCoxreallegesalloftheproceedingparagraphs,andfullyincorporatesthe allegationsaboveandincorporatesallexhibits,motions,andpleadingsshehaspreviously 68.)CounterDefendantRandazzahasdeliberately,directlyandmaliciouslyinterferedwithCox gettingclients,keepingclients,doingbusinessasRandazzahascalled,emailed,andcontacted individualsinvariouswaysaswellashaspaintedCoxouttobeafelonyextortionistinbigand smallmediainternationallyandinsworncourtdocuments.ThishasmadeitsoCoxhaslosther business,lostallrevenue,isunabletorentahome,isunabletosecureajobandisunder constanthate,attackandduress. 69.)CounterDefendantRandazzahasmaliciouslyliedaboutCox,paintedCoxinfalseIight, defamedCox,mobbedCox,threatenedCox,hadothersthreatenanddefameCoxonhisbehalf 18

andhasattackedCoxinmassiveamountsoffalsepublicaccusations,withactualmalice,with knowledgethattheseallegationswerefalse.. 70.)CounterPlaintiffCrystalL,Coxhassufferedirreparabledamagepersonallyand professionally.Therefore,CounterPlaintiffCoxisentitledtoallallowablereliefbylaw.

SixthCauseofAction
CivilConspiracy 71.)CounterPlaintiffCoxreallegesalloftheproceedingparagraphs,andfullyincorporatesthe allegationsabove 72.)DefendantMarcRandazzaconspired,confederated,andcolludedtoviolatetherightsof CounterPlaintiffCoxtothedirectbenefitofCounterDefendantRandazzaandtoCounter PlaintiffCoxsdetriment. 73.)Randazzaconspiredwithmanylawyers,lawfirms,WIPO,Forbes,NPR,andotherlarge andsmallmedia.CoxhasnotnamedcoconspiratorsinthiscountercomplaintasCoxwas GrantedcourtapprovaltofileacounterclaimagainstMarcJ.Randazzaonly,asthisishowCox understandsMotionGrantingthisfiling.(Documentnumber162)

SeventhCauseofAction
ViolationofFirstAmendmentRights 74.)CounterPlaintiffCoxreallegesalloftheproceedingparagraphs,andfullyincorporatesthe allegationsaboveandincorporatesallexhibits,motions,andpleadingsshehaspreviously 75.)CounterDefendantRandazza,havingsuperiorknowledgethatwhathewasdoingwas unconstitutional,ashehimselfhaspreviouslystatedinCaseNo.3D123189,Irina ChevaldinaAppellantvs.R.K./FIManagementInc.et.al "IfacourtissuesaninjunctionpriortoadjudicatingtheFirstAmendmentProtectionofthe speechatissue,theinjunctioncannotpassconstitutionalmuster." "AJudicialOrderthatpreventsfreespeechfromoccurringisunlawful.(ErwinChemerinsky, ConstitutionalLawPrinciplesandPolicies918(2002)(TheClearestdefinitionofpriorrestraint is..ajudicialorderthatpreventsspeechfromoccurring:" "PriorRestraintsarethemostseriousandleasttolerableinfringementonFirstAmendment Rights.Neb.PressAssnv.Stewart,427U.S.539,559(1976).Thereisadeepseated 19

AmericanhostilitytopriorrestraintIdat589(Brennan,J.concurring). Injunctiverelieftopreventactualorthreateneddamageisheavilydisfavoredbecauseitinterferes withtheFirstAmendmentandamountstocensorshippriortoajudicialdeterminationofthe lawlessnessofspeech.SeeMoorev.CityDryCleaners&Laundry,41So.2d865,872(Fla. 1949).Thespecialviceofpriorrestraint,theSupremeCourtheld,isthatcommunicationwill besuppressed...beforeanadequatedeterminationthatitisunprotectedbytheFirst Amendment.PittsburghPressCov.PittsburgCommnonHumanRelations,413U.S.376,390 (1973).AlsoseFortWaynBooksInc.vIndiana,489U.S.46,66(1989)M.I.C.,LtdvBedford Township,463U.S.1341,11343(1983.)" "RKAsoughtextraordinaryreliefintheformofpriorrestrainttoenjoin...Thisreliefisnot

recognizedinthisState,noranywhereelseintheCountry.InadditiontoignoringtheFirst AmendmentRightsandalmostacenturysworthofcommonlaw,the..courtignored virtuallyallproceduralrequirementsfortheissueofapreliminaryinjunction.Page5 ParagraphiiofOpeningBriefAppellateCaseNo.3D123189,IrinaChevaldinaAppellant vs.R.K./FIManagementInc.et.al.,Appellees.AttorneyforAppellantMarcJ.Randazza FloridaBarNo.325566,RandazzaLegalGroupMiamiFlorida. Thiscaseisnowherebyreferencedherein,initsentirety.

RandazzaknowinglyusedanunconstitutionalTROtoshutdownblogsofCox,suppress speech,removeonlinespeechthatspokecriticalofhim,andithasbeen16months. NotonlydidRandazzahavethiscourtshutdownsites,hewasgivenblogsanddomainnames andCoxsonlinespeechandintellectualpropertywasredirectedinthesearchenginestoablog postonCounterDefendantRandazzaslegalblogwhichincitedhateagainstCounterPlaintiff Cox,maliciouslyandknowinglydefamedandslanderedCoxandlinkedtoothersinconspiracy againstCox. 76.)RandazzausedhissuperiorFirstAmendmentknowledgetoviolatedtheFirstAmendment rightsofCounterPlaintiffCoxwithtotaldisregardofherconstitutionalright,dueprocessandthe lawsoftheUnitedstatesofAmerica. 77.)CounterPlaintiffCoxasksthiscourttoapplyanyandallCausesofActiondeemed appropriateandlawfulonCoxsbehalf,inwhichCoxmayhaveleftoutofthiscountercomplaint, asherlimitedknowledgeofthelawasaproselitigant.

20

RequestforRelief
78)CounterPlaintiffprayforjudgmentagainstcounterDefendantMarcJ.Randazza, individually,professionallyandpersonallyintheamountof$10MillionDollars 79.)CounterPlaintiffprayforjudgmentagainstcounterDefendantRandazzaLegalGroup(Law Firm)intheamountof$10MillionDollars 80.)CoxasksthiscourttoenjoinRandazzafromincitinghateagainstCox,paintingCoxoutto beguiltyofthefelonycrimeofExtortion,knowingthatitisfalseanddeliberatelycausingCox harminretaliationforCoxsonlinespeechregardingRandazzaandRGL,andseekingretaliation /revengeforCoxchoosingtoappealObsidianv.CoxtotheNinthCircuit.Anappealthataffects thePornIndustry,andretaliationforCoxchoosingEugeneVolokh,UCLALawProfessorto representheroverCounterDefendantMarcRandazzaandCounterDefendantRandazzaLegal Group. 81.)CoxasksthiscourttoapplyanyandallreliefallowabletoCoxinthismatters,aswellasany actualdamages,punitivedamageoranyreliefwhatsoeverallowablebylaw.

NotetoCourt: CounterPlaintiffCrystalCoxcannotgetlegalcounselinthesemattersassuing,ordefending herselfwhenanattorneyisthePlaintiff/CounterDefendanthasbecomeimpossibleasalllaw firmsandattorneysCoxhasapproachedrefuseorstateitisofficepolicytonotrepresentaclient againstanattorney.AlsoCoxisinfearofherlifeandisinfearofdirectcommunicationsand phonecallswithRandazzasattorney,hisownlawfirmRLG.Coxrequeststhatthiscourtrule thatRandazzaandRLGseekoutsidecounselinthismatter,andgrantCoxacourtappointed, nonconflictedattorney. CoxhasaskedthiscourttoappointheranattorneyinMotionRequestingCourtAppointed Counselandhasbeendenied.ThereforeCoxonceagainasksthiscourttoappointher nonconflictedcounselasCoxhasdonethebestshecantofightbackagainstthesepowerful attorneysandlawfirmswhoareputtingherlife,herbusiness,herclients,herfamily,andher friendsunderconstantduressforover16monthsnow. CounterPlaintiffCoxalsoasksthatthiscourtunderstandthatCoxhasnolegaltraining,is penniless,livinginchurchhousingandisdoingthebestshecantodefendherselfagainstMarc Randazza,andtopleaseadviseCoxwhereshefallsshortintheseproceedings,asmuchas possiblewithinthelimitofthelaw.

21

Coxhashadherelectronicservicerevokedandhastoborrowmoneytoprintandmailany documentsasRandazzaandCoConspiratorshaveruinedCoxsbusiness,reputationandput herinconstantfearofherlifeandthelifeofhersources.

By___________________________ CrystalL.Cox,ProSe 4066249510 SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com POBox2027 PortTownsend,WA98368

CertificationofService
Note:ThisCourtremovedCounterPlaintiffCoxsaccesstoElectronicFilingandCoxcanonly receiveandmailcourtdocumentsviaU.S.mailatthistime. OnFebruary19th,2014,CounterPlaintiffCrystalCoxcertifiesmailingacopyofthiscounter complaintto:

Attention:JudgeJenniferA.Dorsey LasVegasCourts 333LasVegasBlvd.S. Room3071 LasVegas,NV89101

andemailingacopytoCounterDefendantat RDG@randazza.comandmjr@randazza.com TheCurrentAddressforCoxis CrystalCox POBOX2027 PortTownsend,WA98368 SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com 22