Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
D E C E M B E R 2 0 0 6
At the recent Ohio Attorney samples of writings and finding fessor, singing at Woodstock
General Conference, a group similar patterns of speech and as the lead singer in the 1960’s
of FOP people were having such. Anyway, during lunch, group Sha Na Na.
lunch when Roy Hazelwood Dr. Leonard was a pleasant
came and joined us. Mr. enough guy and we had a He began to speak about his
Hazelwood is a former FBI good conversation about his friendship with Jimi Hendrix
Profiler and a well known chosen field of study. and Janis Joplin and such. He
speaker. In fact, he was the began to speak about the
featured speaker to open the Well, during his speech the excesses of the 1960’s rock
conference. With him was a next day, Dr. Leonard ex- and roll lifestyle. It was all
guy who looked like a univer- plained he got into linguistics very interesting.
sity professor and he actually through rock and roll. He
was, Dr. Robert Leonard was said he had a record contract And to think...it was not even
a professor at Hofstra Univer- that said he was supposed to 24 hours earlier that Paul Cox
sity. Dr. Leonard would give make a lot of money but he was sitting next to his adoles-
the opening speech the next wasn’t, so he started studying cent hero and he did not even
day. the language in his contract to know it. You see, Paul has
find out how he was being had a secret fantasy of being a
cheated. doo wop singer and he was
Dr. Leonard is a forensic
The founder of Sha sitting right next to one of the
linguist and studies language.
Na Na is now a He then pressed a remote best. When Paul found out, he
He does work in criminal
control button and up on the began to practice his best
forensic linguist cases like proving someone
screen were movies about Dr. falsetto and his dance moves
wrote this threatening letter
Leonard, the perfect picture in hopes that Dr. Leonard will
by comparing it to known
of an east coast college pro- want to re-form Sha Na Na.
The Justice Department is under pressure to increase federal money for local police programs. In September, the FBI reported
that violent crime rose 2.3 percent in 2005, the largest increase since 1991 and a trend that some police officials have blamed
on cuts in federal crime-fighting grants.
"We need to find out why this is happening, what we can do to reverse that trend," Gonzales said in Boston during the annual
meeting of the International Association of Chiefs of Police.
While Gonzales said the review is important to determine the causes of what he described as a "small uptick" in violent crime,
he said the overall crime rate is the lowest in more than 30 years.
Some police organizations expressed disappointment that the initiative doesn't include immediate financial help for police de-
partments struggling to make up for years of reductions in federal funding. The Bush administration has cut grants for state and
local crime-fighting programs on the grounds that they've outlived their usefulness or have underperformed. COPS, a program
aimed at hiring 100,000 police officers nationwide, has been among those hit the hardest. Legislation pending before Congress
would largely restore the administration cuts proposed this year.
Thomas Frazier, executive director of the Major Cities Chiefs Association, which represents the police departments in the 56
largest cities, said the departments already know the reason for rising violent-crime rates: gangs, drug use and poverty.
The Justice Department can help police departments with rising crime by pushing for an increase in federal funding, Frazier
said.
An hour and a half before his shift started, the grievant called his supervisor and asked to be given sick leave for a migraine head-
ache. Six hours later the grievant was awakened by a phone call from a fellow officer who was concerned about a mutual friend who
was behaving strangely and asked the grievant if he could join him and their friend for dinner at a local bar and restaurant. At the
restaurant were a group of other officers and their spouses seated in another area. They all joined together for dinner. The next morn-
ing, the grievant and the officer who had called him played softball together. The friend who was behaving strangely showed up at
the department and rambled incoherently to a sergeant, who discovered in the interview that the strange friend had been to dinner the
night before with the grievant. The sergeant, who knew the grievant had called in sick, notified the chief about the grievant and his
sick leave request. When interviewed, the grievant explained all the events as they happened. The employer suspended the grievant
for 13 days for abuse of sick leave and for being dishonest.
At the arbitration hearing, the FOP/OLC attorney argued that the employer could not prove the grievant was not sick when he called
in sick, that there was nothing that prevented an employee who was not capable of performing his duties from having dinner, that the
grievant’s employment record showed no other discipline nor any history of sick leave use, and that the employer charged him with
dishonesty simply because they didn’t believe he was sick. A thirteen day suspension for a first time allegation of sick leave abuse
was excessive, calling for a one day suspension at most.
The arbitrator agreed with the FOP/OLC. The employer failed to prove its case and had disciplined the grievant based on conjecture,
theorizing that the grievant had arranged to meet the group for dinner and used the guise of being sick to be available for the dinner
occasion. The arbitrator also noted that the contract and department policy failed to limit the activities of employees who called in
sick, though he did note that certain activities might call the legitimate use of sick leave into question.
The arbitrator ordered that the grievant be paid for the 13 days the employer had suspended him.
(Issued September 22, 2006. Employer-City of Cuyahoga Falls)
THERE IS NO WAY YOU SHOULD MISS THIS!!!
PAGE 6
Our next state conference in Independence, Marco and the Michigan President, John
Ohio will feature all the business and fra- Kirkpatrick, where the winner would host the
ternalism to which you are accustomed. loser at their state conference and outfit the
There will also be something happening loser in the winning team’s colors.
that you have never seen...
As everyone in the world should have known
Lets start from the beginning, your FOP ahead of time, the great Ohio State Buckeyes
You think he will leaders were in Boston at an Eastern States came out ahead of their fierce rivals.
enjoy wearing his meeting when the topic of the Ohio State
Troy Smith jersey versus Michigan game came up. Na- Because of the outcome, President Kirkpatrick
in the state up tional Trustee, Chet DeLong suggested a will be asked to come to our conference. Per-
north???? bet between your President, Nick Di- haps we will be able to get him to sing Carmen
Ohio.
The case stems from a 1998 incident in Georgia where a fleeing suspect was traveling at 100 mph and a PIT maneuver was used to try to stop
him. He was sent over an embankment. The suspect lived but was rendered a quadriplegic.
Most state laws say that the police are not liable for injuries caused fleeing the police but this case is being argued as a
improper seizure under the 4th amendment. A lower court agreed with this argument and it was appealed directly to
the Supreme Court.
Please keep an eye on this as it may affect police pursuit policies across the country.