Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Ylaster Narratives and metanarratives oF history, culture and naLior'tal identity as accepted before WWII (American-European myths of progress). Myths of cultural and ethnic- origin accepted as received.
Po s tmode
rn/
Po s tmode
rn i ty
Surspiclon and rejection of Master Narratives for hisLory and culture; local narraLives, ironic deconstruction of master narratives: countermyths of orig in.
Faith in "Grand Theory" (totalizlng explanations in h-istory, science and culture) to represent all knowledge and explain
eve ryth ing
.
Faith in, and myths of, social and cultural unity/ hierarchies of social-class and
Social and cultural pluralism, disunity, unclear bases for social/national/ ethnic Llnity,
bases
ldea of "the family" as central r-rnit of social order: model of the middle-class, nuclear famlly. Heterosexual norms.
Alternatlve family units, alternatives to middle-class marriage model, multiple identities for couplings and childraising. Polysexuality, exposure of repressed homosexual and homosocial realities in
cultu res.
(N
Trust and investment in micropolitics, identity politics, local politics, institutional power
strugg les,
Rhizom e/su rface tropes. Attention to play of surfaces, images, signifiers without concern for "Depth", Relational and horizontal difrerences,
d
Root/Depth tropes. Faith in "Depth" (meaning, value, content, the signified) over "Surface" (appearances, the superficial, the sign)fier),
Crisis in representation and status of the image after photography and mass media,
Culture adapting to simulation, visual media becom i ng u nd iffe re ntiated eq u iva ent fo rrns, simuiation and real-time media substituting for the real.
I
Faith in the "real" beyond media, language, syrnbols, and representations, aLithenticity of
"orig ina ls. "
Hyper-realrty, image saturation, srrnulacra seem more powerful ihan the "real"; images and texts with no prior "original". "As seen on TV" and "as sen on ,,lTV" are rnore powerful than uninediaied eric,erience. Disruptir:n of the dorninance of hrur cultr_rre by popirlar cultr-rre. ivl i,.<ing oI popular and highr c,-t jiui,-. ne\n/ valuation o1'pop cultLr re. h.,iir-tr , L:.r al foi-ms cancel hlgh i low calegcrr:s Dei,assil'iea
Dichotomy of high and iovrr culiure (official vs, popular cultr-tre). Imposed consensus thai ir r!. -r olflcial culture is normativ an.l ai. l ' ii-atir,:, the
:5.::_ao,i.r-
:-:'1__ __
*utf"!i'_rg:
cr-t
ltilre,
Tnass
._
nislrei w.-,rl; Art as uniqute ,:b ':ci a. eutthenticatecl by er ri:r.: arrd vAli:::e,-1 ay agreed r-r pon siandari,-
.u,,.,r"ffi--;
i..
::i
-"ra
-,,r,r-, ,iei_l
_:,
__1,,,r
Art as proces-s, p.-;;;=**Art as recycling ttf cu iLL i-e -- - audienci: ai-rd v'alidair.:l ,r-, -,
ri.jn1.it)' lrii)-i- i' ,- : ri,
:, .ri-c
lltlUl
ltlsLlVll
lllcllldgqlllcl
lu/
ll oVlllErrLEu/
Pol
Lrol
Digita
l,
nte
ractive,
cl
broadcast
knowledge.
Determ inacy , dependence, hierarchy.
Androgyny/ queer sexual identities, polymorphous sexuality, mass marketing of pornography, porn style mixing with mainstream images.
Hypermedia as transcendence of the physical limits of print media. The Web as infinitely expandable, centerless, inter-connected i nformation system.
The book as sufficient bearer of the lniord. The library as complete and total system for printed knowledge.