Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE 01
This raised issues not only effect the people in the community itself, but also the community of
people surrounding the place. As Sunda Kelapa is the earliest settlement residing in Jakarta
since 500 years ago, it is especially worst when the harbour which have large opportunities in
developing its tourism factor, are being blurred by the fact that this old harbour are the victim of
heavy pollution of its environment. Although this problem is not only focusing on Sunda Kelapa
alone but to all around Jakarta, Sunda Kelapa is supposed to be one of the world’s heritage that’s
meant to be kept in preservance, to save the specility of its culture, artistic Phinisi schooners
and especially the harbour itself as the main port that transfers goods all around Indonesia.
The slums which have been parasiting the site near to Pasar Ikan ( Fish Market ) almost
200 years ago have establish their own community which survive their own life without other’s
help. This can be seen from the way they live , which only occupies for the basic, the needs and
not merely their desire. The surviving talent of the slums community are being put in good use.
As time goes by and many problems arised due to their inhabition to
the place not legal to them, land issues have become meaningless,
yet the need to survive is what the community are looking for.
However,human are meant for the basic healthy lifestyle they longed for, and with these
deteriorated slums being a parasite to the tourism factor which can be developed further in future,
the slums are seen as an oppurtunity in developing new habitation; a unique and one of a kind
that reflects its community specialities and in some term, promoting Sunda Kelapa unofficially.
With a new scheme being proposed on the site the slum dwellers built themselves, this scheme
is a manifestation of the rights of people to love and make living their most worthy activities.
The overall masterplan constitute a variety of interelation between the source
of economy, social activities and the housing scheme. These relationship is being
developed in a natural flow that the phase can’t be seen with bare eyes. The agriculture
activities is proposed to generate source of income to the people in the community while
maintaining its food production to survive everyday life. The intervention of arts and craft
centre is in line with the intention to promote tourism activities within the particular site.
Roa Tambora
Melaka
Jambatan
Lima
Pinangsia
SUNDA KELAPA Glodok
Keagungan
Source : URDI 2007
Old CIty
Cultural /Ethnical
Cultural /Ethnical
New Expansion
Slums
SUNDA
K ELAPA
harbour
ware
HOUSE
museum
BAHARI
luar batang
$ RP
SLUM
density
Millions 16000
Popula on density (%)
14000
2.97 12000
8.6 1961
11.3 4.58
1971 10000
18.2 1961
1971 1980 8000 Popula on density
1980 6.5 1990 6000 Total area (sqkm)
9.3
1990 8.39 2000 4000
2000 2003 2000
12.1 9.4 8.26
0
196119711980199020002003
Source: Dharmapati and Firman, 1995, p.309; Firman, 1997, p.1040; Firman, 1998, p.238 Source: Dharmapati and Firman, 1995, p.309; Firman, 1997, p.1040; Firman, 1998, p.238
Migrants
DKI Jakarta population = 8.60 million in 2003,
= rising from 0.56 million in 1942
= 1.78 million in 1952 (see Table 2).
The population density (person/sq km) at Jakarta = 13,233 in 2003
climbing from 4,566 in 1961, and has doubled over 40 years.
Poverty
UNEMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY RATE
2005-2009 ( MILLIONS OF PEOPLE)
45
39.3
40 37.17
36.15 35.1
34.96
35
31
30
Poverty + poor infrastructure ---> 32% Indonesia’s poor in urban areas (1999)
1/3 of urban households had access to piped water
Modern sewer networks serve only 1% of the urban population
50 right to housing:
40
All landowner
Habitability
30 households
Security of tenure Location
20 Unregistered
landowner Access to services
10 households + infrastructure
0
Unreg. legal Unreg. quasi Unreg. other Cultural adequacy
legal Physical Accessibility
Source: Hoffman, 1992: 332
Emergence
Emerge :
Come up or out into
view become Slums
known;recover from Community
a difficult situation
Economic Generator
Social Movement
Ecological systems
Resilience
Neo Resilient :
Village Readily recover-
ing from shock
or distress
Based on the definition of Holling (2001), Alberti et al (2003) have defined urban resilience as
the degree to which cities are able to tolerate alteration before reorganising around a new set of
structures and processes. They assert that urban resilience can be measured by how well a city
can simultaneously balance ecosystem and human functions.
A society that is flexible and able to adjust in the face of uncertainty and surprise is also able to
capitalise on positive opportunities the future may bring (Berkes and Folke 1998; Barnett 2001).
unmanage
Proposed
unhealthy waste
landscape Programme
environment lack green
open space
polluted water
economic
generator
narrow streets
streets compact Proposed
activity in Programme
one space
no proper jetty
from sea
social
movement
deterioted Wrecked
buildings house walls + roof Proposed
Programme
abandoned High density
in Small space
warehouse
No supply of
clean water
+ electricity
ecological
systems
living
machine
RESILIENCE
Section
Incorporated to roof for max
tilt angle
section
Solar panel as building envelope
used
assembled zinc
used
assembled zinc
/ wood
Section
Solar panel as building envelope
Existing Deteriorated dwelling
Water
catchment
sytems
dwelling
dwelling
Diagrammatic cistern
Using water catchment system
Solar panel tilted
on roof
Water catchment
system
Solar panel
integrated
building envelope
Water
Rainwater
cistern
collector cistern
collector Section
dwelling
Shop at Small Garden as Direct entrance Indirect entrance Upper Level Veranda as
door step buffer space entry buffer space
narrow street wider street widening : busy varied street straight streets curved routes
no activities more activities narrowing : quiet widths/ less activity trapping activities
varied intensity :more dynamic
The shape of streets will match the existing natural paths of movement, giving the street network an organic
structure that is preserved through successful transformations in the urban fabric.
2nd settlement
3rd settlement
main road
movement
RP $ pasar ikan
historical
commercials
museum bahari
the ‘centre’ of a settlement is amix of land uses and (maritime museum)
activities in a prominent location.
luar batang $
PASAR
$ RP existing programme
graph : existing mixed use
SUNDA
harbour
museum
BAHARI
movement
empty space
manipulated to
generate income
3. To use the basic needs of the community to have a healthier life as the main
advantage into realizing their self-built home.
HOUSING
bridge
ART & CRAFT
CENTRE
“kampung
square
parking area
AGRICULTURE- parking
hydrophonic area
masjid
+ civic +
medical
centre
loading
area
The overall masterplan dictates a certain application of linearity in terms of its disposition on site. The
urban streams are being trailed along to duplicate its natural flow of movement. Along each streets,
waterfront and building frontage, the scheme are arranged to manipulate its context to the maximum.
To achieve a natural flow of people’s movement, hosuing modules are integrated with the street
patterns to form an organic flow that is being translated from its original street patterns and movement.
The proposal of this scheme is enforced from the design of housing blocks which is formed from the
offset shift of a rectangular module developed into more units. The housing blocks are assembled
by stacking up and staggered into a long, narrow lots.These lots provide ample room for a home,
vegetable garden and rainwater harvesting system for every house- everything for a family to sustain
itself. The module are designed to let the homes close enough to shade each other and protect each
other from high winds. However, it is far enough apart to allow air to move around each structure.
The buildings themselves are raised on platforms that act like a raft during flood disaster.Floating
materials of plastic bottles which can’t be diminished over time are used for advantage.For air flow
underneath, the module are tall to allow heat to rise, and narrow, which eased cross ventilation.
Besides having these criteria, the scheme also represent a unique use of recycled tins creatively,plastic
bottles which cannot be banish and also sandbags,besides applying the use of reclaimed wood as
structural frame of the house. From this concept we see a perfect basis for sustainable urban design.
“kampung square”
public building
floating platform
green area
boardwalk
pedestrian pavement
existing buildings
main road
water elements
“STRUCTURE”
“ Energy Shading “
daylight filtered
photovoltaic compenents
use the recycle material which can keep the air..and will
not banished in the ground in long term.
“PLASTIC BOTTLE”
Unit
percentage
Target
Audience
Landscape
Interaction
Arrangement
Existing Existing
programme programme
Existing programme
Merge programme
Fragmentation
Fragmentation Split deformation
Fragmentation
25% 25%
Fragmentation
25% 25%
allocation
shared facilities
Permutation Permutation
Recycled
tin cans
Sand-
bags Recycled
Reclaimed plastic
timber bottles
Section b-b
Bedroom 1
Living/ Living/
Bedroom 1 b
Flex Flex a
Bedroom 2
Terrace
entrance side for ample view from both units
ent. Living/
Living/ Flex
Flex Study/
Dining Flex
/ Flex Dining
/ Flex Bath
Bath
Bedroom 2
c d
Kitchen Kitchen
Bedroom 1 Veranda
Ground First
Ground First
Commercial Module Commercial housing module are located
opposite Museum Bahari for connection
Commercial Unit a Commercial Unit b
ent. Veranda with the museum.Possible self
Living Bedroom 2
Living
ent. commercial/ streets shop are
Bedroom
Kitchen
2 considered in between housing
store
Dining
Store B
Bath
units around whole site.
Working bath
space
Working
space
Bedroom 1 Bedroom 1 a b
Shop front
Shop front Veranda
ath
Back Elevation
Front Elevation
Right Elevation
Left Elevation