0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
683 Ansichten15 Seiten
Leah Robb (I) wrote this Triangle Theory years after completing art college, where I did not understand the rules of art-making. Why was it not considered a 'theme' to look into "light and shadow"? And why was is seen as wrong to have any particular message in your art and yet you were encouraged to have some kind of concept? They wanted a motive without conviction, it seemed. I was so confused. In 2006 I heard a talk on Beauty and Objective Truth in art by professor Jim Parker. This talk was a catalyst for me to make my own art theory, that I have called, The Triangle Theory due to the interplay of three elements that are found in art.
Foreword by Aaron Stimpson, written as a TED Talk submission:
"Leah Robb’s latest book on neo-art-theory has the possibility of completely changing the conversation of the art world as a whole. It is the art-theory “code-breaker”; a first of its kind within art!
With no exaggeration, you will find yourself questioning the very practice of art criticism and its use in the art community as well as agreeing with how this new art dialogue will influence how we approach art from within our education system as well as many other channels in the art world.
Leah Robb's theory is by far the most fascinating thing to come across the art sphere in a long time and it certainly belongs in the archives of TED Talks among top scholars. It is an earthquake epicentre waiting to be exposed!
Many readers of her publication, Theory on Objective Criticism of Art, have enthusiastically recommended that she put forward a Ted Talk proposal. All of them have said that it would change the way the art world looks at art from this point forward!
One reader of her publication reviewed it as follows:
"Bravely setting out to find an island of unassailable firmness in the swamp of subjective and meaningless art criticism, Leah Robb manages to build a convincing case to help the rest of us to understand why something in our local art gallery might be classed as art. If only the art critics, themselves, would read this book!
Her theory doesn't disallow the bizarre or the shocking, but neither does it overlook the skill involved in crafting an unforgettable image. Above all she tries to bring meaning back to the centre of a piece's worth; to ask the question - Is it connecting with the audience?
Trying to keep herself to the point, and peppered with intriguing pictures and quotes, she has succeeded in helping us to map the cosmos of the visual arts. Not only that, but her theory is equally applicable to our appreciation of drama and poetry. I like this book."
Phil Busby, Poet.
Another reader has described it as:
"A bomb sent right into the heart of the art critic's fortress".
It has already challenged many artists as well as critiques to revisit their art evaluation criteria. It, in and of itself, is a masterpiece!"
Leah Robb (I) wrote this Triangle Theory years after completing art college, where I did not understand the rules of art-making. Why was it not considered a 'theme' to look into "light and shadow"? And why was is seen as wrong to have any particular message in your art and yet you were encouraged to have some kind of concept? They wanted a motive without conviction, it seemed. I was so confused. In 2006 I heard a talk on Beauty and Objective Truth in art by professor Jim Parker. This talk was a catalyst for me to make my own art theory, that I have called, The Triangle Theory due to the interplay of three elements that are found in art.
Foreword by Aaron Stimpson, written as a TED Talk submission:
"Leah Robb’s latest book on neo-art-theory has the possibility of completely changing the conversation of the art world as a whole. It is the art-theory “code-breaker”; a first of its kind within art!
With no exaggeration, you will find yourself questioning the very practice of art criticism and its use in the art community as well as agreeing with how this new art dialogue will influence how we approach art from within our education system as well as many other channels in the art world.
Leah Robb's theory is by far the most fascinating thing to come across the art sphere in a long time and it certainly belongs in the archives of TED Talks among top scholars. It is an earthquake epicentre waiting to be exposed!
Many readers of her publication, Theory on Objective Criticism of Art, have enthusiastically recommended that she put forward a Ted Talk proposal. All of them have said that it would change the way the art world looks at art from this point forward!
One reader of her publication reviewed it as follows:
"Bravely setting out to find an island of unassailable firmness in the swamp of subjective and meaningless art criticism, Leah Robb manages to build a convincing case to help the rest of us to understand why something in our local art gallery might be classed as art. If only the art critics, themselves, would read this book!
Her theory doesn't disallow the bizarre or the shocking, but neither does it overlook the skill involved in crafting an unforgettable image. Above all she tries to bring meaning back to the centre of a piece's worth; to ask the question - Is it connecting with the audience?
Trying to keep herself to the point, and peppered with intriguing pictures and quotes, she has succeeded in helping us to map the cosmos of the visual arts. Not only that, but her theory is equally applicable to our appreciation of drama and poetry. I like this book."
Phil Busby, Poet.
Another reader has described it as:
"A bomb sent right into the heart of the art critic's fortress".
It has already challenged many artists as well as critiques to revisit their art evaluation criteria. It, in and of itself, is a masterpiece!"
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Leah Robb (I) wrote this Triangle Theory years after completing art college, where I did not understand the rules of art-making. Why was it not considered a 'theme' to look into "light and shadow"? And why was is seen as wrong to have any particular message in your art and yet you were encouraged to have some kind of concept? They wanted a motive without conviction, it seemed. I was so confused. In 2006 I heard a talk on Beauty and Objective Truth in art by professor Jim Parker. This talk was a catalyst for me to make my own art theory, that I have called, The Triangle Theory due to the interplay of three elements that are found in art.
Foreword by Aaron Stimpson, written as a TED Talk submission:
"Leah Robb’s latest book on neo-art-theory has the possibility of completely changing the conversation of the art world as a whole. It is the art-theory “code-breaker”; a first of its kind within art!
With no exaggeration, you will find yourself questioning the very practice of art criticism and its use in the art community as well as agreeing with how this new art dialogue will influence how we approach art from within our education system as well as many other channels in the art world.
Leah Robb's theory is by far the most fascinating thing to come across the art sphere in a long time and it certainly belongs in the archives of TED Talks among top scholars. It is an earthquake epicentre waiting to be exposed!
Many readers of her publication, Theory on Objective Criticism of Art, have enthusiastically recommended that she put forward a Ted Talk proposal. All of them have said that it would change the way the art world looks at art from this point forward!
One reader of her publication reviewed it as follows:
"Bravely setting out to find an island of unassailable firmness in the swamp of subjective and meaningless art criticism, Leah Robb manages to build a convincing case to help the rest of us to understand why something in our local art gallery might be classed as art. If only the art critics, themselves, would read this book!
Her theory doesn't disallow the bizarre or the shocking, but neither does it overlook the skill involved in crafting an unforgettable image. Above all she tries to bring meaning back to the centre of a piece's worth; to ask the question - Is it connecting with the audience?
Trying to keep herself to the point, and peppered with intriguing pictures and quotes, she has succeeded in helping us to map the cosmos of the visual arts. Not only that, but her theory is equally applicable to our appreciation of drama and poetry. I like this book."
Phil Busby, Poet.
Another reader has described it as:
"A bomb sent right into the heart of the art critic's fortress".
It has already challenged many artists as well as critiques to revisit their art evaluation criteria. It, in and of itself, is a masterpiece!"
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Foreword by Aaron Stimpson, written as a TED Talk submission:
"Leah Robbs latest talk on neo-art-theory has the possibility of completely changing the conversation of the art world as a whole. It is the art-theory code-breaker; a first of its kind within art! With no exaggeration, you will find yourself questioning the very practice of art criticism and its use in the art community as well as agreeing with how this new art dialogue will influence how we approach art from within our education system as well as many other channels in the art world. Leah Robb and her latest talk on neo-art-theory is by far the most fascinating thing to come across the art sphere in a long time and it certainly belongs in the archives of TED Talks among top scholars. It is an earthquake epicentre waiting to be exposed! I would like to nominate her for the line up in TED Talks everywhere! Many readers of her publication, Theory on Objective Criticism of Art, have enthusiastically recommended that she put forward a Ted Talk proposal. All of them have said that it would change the way the art world looks at art from this point forward! One reader of her publication reviewed it as follows: "Bravely setting out to find an island of unassailable firmness in the swamp of subjective and meaningless art criticism, Leah Robb manages to build a convincing case to help the rest of us to understand why something in our local art gallery might be classed as art. If only the art critics, themselves, would read this book! Her theory doesn't disallow the bizarre or the shocking, but neither does it overlook the skill involved in crafting an unforgettable image. Above all she tries to bring meaning back to the centre of a piece's worth; to ask the question - Is it connecting with the audience? Trying to keep herself to the point, and peppered with intriguing pictures and quotes, she has succeeded in helping us to map the cosmos of the visual arts. Not only that, but her theory is equally applicable to our appreciation of drama and poetry. I like this book." Phil Busby, Poet. Another reader has described it as: "A bomb sent right into the heart of the art critic's fortress". It has already challenged many artists as well as critiques to revisit their art evaluation criteria. It, in and of itself, is a masterpiece!"
Otto Frello, Break Out, 1994. Oil on Canvas. 105x70cm. Varde Museum, Denmark
Two Women by Otto Frello 1985. Oil on Canvas. 52 x 72cm
POST-MODERNISM = 'WHATEVER'
ELLIS POTTER
The Triangle Theory Graph - A Triangular Tug of War. LR, 2006