Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Make Claims on Us
An action plan for incorporating social justice within the
employment practices of Santa Clara University.
“Jesus struggled against any type of social force, which, in one way or
another, dehumanized human beings. To Jesus, God’s archetypal plan is
for human beings to have life. Life, in all its fullness, including its
materiality, is God’s first mediation.” – Jon Sobrino, S.J. in The Epiphany
of the God of Life in Jesus of Nazareth.
“To ignore injustice in the name of avoiding conflict is merely to drive the
injustice deeper into the social structures and make more difficult the
ultimate reconciliation.” – Robert McAffee Brown in Religion and Violence
Worker C – a single mother – has two college degrees and is raising one
child on her salary.
“My parents help buy my child’s shoes. Those are the really
expensive things these days.
“I live close to campus and that cuts down on transportation costs.
“I’m a good cook. We rarely eat out. But I buy lots of fresh food.
“We never go on vacations.
“Half my monthly salary pays the house payment. We try to live on
the other half. At income tax time when I get a refund, I do needed repairs
on the house.
“Because my divorce took place in the 1980s (when prices were
lowers), I was able to buy a modest tow-bedroom house. That means I’m
much better off than some single moms.
“The most difficult part of this situation is that we have no sense of a
cushion. We live right at the limit of my income. It’s scary to know we have
no savings. There is no confidence that we can do anything extra. If
someone die3s, we have no money for a plane trip to the funeral.”
“Service, not power, is the coin of that realm which was God’s on earth.
The greater were to serve the lesser. The strong to serve the weak.” – Leo
Rock, S.J. in Making Friends With Yourself.
Free lunches
Since the university guarantees Marriott’s a certain number of meals,
perhaps those which are “unbought” could go in a bank that hungry workers
could use. One or two lunches a week would save a significant amount in
the overburdened budgets of many of these employees. Other ideas for
establishing a “bank” of meals might include voluntarily contributing to a
“SCUpons” bank (as employees can now voluntarily contribute vacation
time to those who need it).
Or, perhaps, at the end of the fiscal year if there is money left in
departmental budgets, a portion of it could be contributed to the SCUpons
bank.
Bill Cooper, Marriott manager, suggested the Kenna Club sponsor a
social justice SCUpons for Santa Clara’s working poor. He also suggested
exchanging a lunch for mealtime work. “If the university could let one or
two leave their work to cater tables or serve meals, we could supply that
worker with lunch or dinner,” he said. “There are ways to work out such an
arrangement. It’s to no one’s benefit here to have people working while
they’re hungry.”
Weekend vacation
Jesuit retreat centers could be made available for weekend get-a-ways
for low-income families. These quiet places could give the working poor a
feeling of vacation once or twice a year. They would also provide a spiritual
environment that could strengthen family ties.
The Marianist Center in Cupertino charges $55 per person to stay on
their grounds. The fee covers one night’s lodging and three meals. Perhaps
board members, alumni or the Jesuit community would sponsor one or two
families a year for a weekend.
Villa Maria del Mar in Santa Cruz and San Joan Batista Retreat
Center charge about the same. However, they do not accept children. Some
of the older single workers might find a peaceful weekend get-a-way just
what they need for spiritual and emotional renewal.
Perhaps, as an employer, the university could sponsor a free family
retreat weekend once a year especially for the lowest paid workers.
Free parking
The university could provide free parking permits for the lowest paid
employees. Those at the high-end of the pay scale enjoy numerous perks.
Why not a perk or two for the working poor? Although $40 a year is a
minute amount for the university to forego, it represents a significant savings
on the small incomes earned by those in pay ranks 13-16.
“The message of the human Jesus was that things are broken, but they will
be fixed and we are to be involved in making that happen; the reign of God
is to be realized now, and it is love that will bring it to fulfillment.”
-- Donald Ciffone in On the Brokenness of Creation.
As I have shared my concern for the working poor of Santa Clara University
with others on campus and have discussed the problems and possible ways
of making the lowest paid employees’ lives a little easier, additional
suggestions have been made. Here they are:
Coaching Camp
We could make Coaching Camp (for 9-13 year olds) available to the
children of SCU’s working poor. Perhaps a one-week campership for two or
three kids each summer. These kids have virtually no special or enriching
experiences to help make their summers enjoyable.
Tuition for a week is about $150. Perhaps board members, alumni or
the Jesuit community could sponsor one or two children each summer.
Andy Locatelli, who directs coaching camp, told me that occasionally
in the past the athletic department has accepted a few disadvantaged children
into the coaching camp at no charge. Surely we could do the same for one or
two children of low wage employees.
Project 50
We could reserve two or three places in Project 50 for the children of
SCU’s lowest paid workers. This excellent program helps disadvantaged
children learn about college as a possibility for their future. It would be an
excellent summer experience for the children of the university’s working
poor.
Airfare for funerals
For working poor who may need to attend a family funeral but have
no money for a plane ticket home, we could use “frequent flier” miles from
administrators who travel often.
Other corporations do this by writing into their travel policy that
frequent flyer certificates are co-property of the company and the traveler,
and can in certain extreme (or appropriate) circumstances be designated to
others because of family emergencies. Administrators and other frequent
fliers would have to agree to this, of course, but it is a possibility.
This can be done informally by simply asking administrators and
other frequent fliers to donate miles for those on campus who need them.
Career development
As a university, Santa Clara is a center of learning. We can offer our
expertise – education and training – to the working poor as part of their job,
to encourage professional growth and development, and to develop an ever-
improving workforce for the university.
At the start of each quarter, a list of classes could be sent to managers
and supervisors. The lists could be posted on work-area bulletin boards so
that employees could see what is available. The managers and supervisors
could also be encouraged to urge their workers to take classes which will
improve their work skills and/or develop new skills that could qualify them
for higher-paying jobs within the university.
At the beginning of each academic year, a memo could be sent to the
community saying that managers are encouraged to discuss available courses
with staff and to provide time for career development courses and classes.
A longer-term project to fine tune career development on campus
could start with a survey of campus job openings over the last five years. See
what jobs have been vacated, find out what skills those jobs require, and
then offer classes in those particular job skills to our staff employees.
Tutoring
Santa Clara can use existing programs to benefit the working poor.
While the Eastside Project serves the poor outside the campus, Santa Clara
can provide similar services to the poor within our campus community. For
example, we could provide tutoring through SCCAP for the children of the
working poor. Such tutoring could be extended to the employees,
themselves, if they suffer from poor English speaking or writing skills.
The university has a good track record of developing services for the
poor. That track record and those services can serve an equally important
purpose for the working poor within our own corporate community.
Wage redirection
All of the suggestions so far have to do with establishing new ways of
doing things at Santa Clara University. Although there will certainly be costs
associated with these suggestions, none of the proposed solutions call for a
radical reallocation of funds to lighten the financial burden of SCU’s
working poor.
Liberation theology would suggest such a reallocation. Liberation
theology would ask for a radical – Christianized – financial structure where
those on the bottom do not suffer while those on the top enjoy luxury (in
liberation theology terms, “luxury” means more than is needed).
In these times of financial retrenchment, could the university ask top
wage earners to forego a 3 percent wage increase next year and redirect
those dollars to establishing some of the programs described in this action
plan?
There are 28 employees in pay scale ranks 24, 25 and 26. If we
assume an average salary of $100,000 for them, 3 percent would contribute
$84,000 for improving the lot of SCU’s working poor. Obviously, if the
average income of these high-paid individuals is less than $100,000, the
available funds would also be less. Whatever the actual figures, the
university asked top administrators once before to take a one-year wage
freeze. Ten staff members benefited from that freeze. This plan proposes to
benefit far more than ten workers.
Positive Publicity
If Santa Clara University actually puts into practice these suggestions
and begins to shape a reality the principles of social justice lauded by so
many theorists, SCU could become the focal point for media reports on
social justice. Articles in such publications as Change and The Chronicle of
Higher Education, coverage by such TV shows as “60 Minutes” (CBS) or
“20/20” (NBC), to say nothing of newspaper and magazine coverage, would
make the name of Santa Clara University synonymous with leadership in
social justice.
The university could become a model for all kinds of institutions in
the equitable treatment of employees.
In the moral, ethical, social justice arenas as well as within the
employment realm, SCU could find itself out in front, the acknowledged
national leader.
[1] Gustavo Gutierrez, We Drink from Our Own Wells, (Orbis: New York,
1992) p. 12.
[2] Jon Sobrino, S.J., Christology at the Crossroads, (Orbis: New York,
1992) p. 393.
[3] “Paranoid in Los Altos,” an editorial published in the July 21, 1993, San
Jose Mercury News.
[4] “No place like home for the holidays,’ an article published in the
December 9, 1992, Santa Clara Spectrum.