R E P U BLIC

OFTHE PHILIPPINES
Departmentof Labor and Employment
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONSCOMMISSION
RegionalArbitration BranchNo. III
City of SanFernando,Pampanga

TONY BRIAN HORN,

Complainant,

- versus- NLRCCaseNo. RAB-III-03-L464O-09

OPSEC INTERNATIONAL GROUP

INC., NORMANHAYNES,MATILDE
HAYNESand HUNTERHAYNES,

x___________ lesnoT-'-:-t;
REJOINDER
RESPONDENTS'
(OnComplainant's
Reply)

throughthe undersignedcounsel,unto this HonorableOffice,

Respondents,

respectfully state that "Complainant's Reply" had been substantially

in their "Replyto Complainant's

to by Respondents
commented/replied Position

Paper"datedfune28, 2009.

In view of the foregoing,

respondents
deemit appropriateto adoptsignificant

discussedin the aforesaidReplyand to elaboratemore clearlythe

considerations

mattersdiscussed
therein,to wit:

1.. There is no truth or factual and legal basis to complainant's allegation that

respondents'illegally dismissedcomplainant Tony Brian Horn (HORN,for

brevity). In the present case,there is hardly any evidence on record so as to

meet the quantum of evidence required to believe that Complainant was

indeed illegally dismissed. Complainant's claim of illegal dismissal is

supported by no other than his own bare, uncorroborated and, thus, self-
2.. Complainanthimself narrated that on October 27, 2008, Norman Haynes

told him that "nothing good could come out of it" if he were in the Monday

meetingr. By Complainant'sown thinking, Nornran Flaynes'words wcre

translated as illegal dismissal. However, with these statement alone as

complainant'sbasis for his allegationof illegal dismissal,his complaint must

fail for it is based on a misconceptiononly created in the mind of the

complainant.

3. More importantly,if it wcre really the intention of respondentOPSEC

to

dismiss the complainant, it would have carried its action by advising the

complainanteither orally or in writing that he was being dismissedby its

authorizedofficersor administrators.
It is elementarythat a corporation,

being a juridical entity, may act only through its directors, officers and

employees.
In the sameway,any act of dismissing
an omployeemustbe done

by authorizedofficersor representative
of a corporation.The recordis bereft

of evidenceto show that respondentOPSECnotified or informed the

complainant
that he had beendismissed.
Moreover,NormanHaynes,as the

personwho dismissed
so-called him,is neitheran incorporator,
a stockholder

nor an employeeof respondcntOPSEC.

4. Notice also the inconsistenciesin complainant'sdeclaration.As admitted by

himself he was allegedlydismissedby Norman Haynesand refusedto enter

companypremiseson October 27. 20082,as appearingin his PositionPaper

dated May 1B, 2009. However,in his AmendedComplaintdated April 1,2009

 (copy of which is hereto marked and attachedqs A4nex 7), complainant

indicatedthat he was dismissedon October13, 2008, which incidentallyis

alsothe very datewhich he claimedin his PositionPaper3asthe datewhenhe

departedfor ferusalemon an allegedcompanyauthorizedvacationto which

In his PositionPaper,he was

he claimedhe was entitledto getthe $L0,000.00.

in effect convincingthis HonorableOfficethat he was still an employeeof

OPSECon October 13, 2008 but in his Initial Complaintand Amended

Complaintfiledon April 1,2009,heis statingotherwise'

had sensationally
5. Likewise,Complainant his allegationclfbeing
underscored

deprived entry from the company premises. ON THE CONTMRY,

admitted that after October27,2A08,he was ableto return to

Complainant

the compoundto give some files and help respondent'snew office staffa,

3, 2008, he again
pa:'ticuiariyon Decerrrber
Again,on severaloccasions,

returnedto receivea generousamountas financialaid for his family and

other charitablepursuits. For this reason,the fact alone that he wqs able to

return to the premises in numerous occasion raises doubt as to his

theatricalillustrationof
purported ban from the same Surely,complainant's

premiseswith armedguardsin
him beingdeniedaccessfrom respondents'
-- all in
continuoussurveillanceis an embellishmentand a mere exaggeration

the hopesof solicitingsympathyfrom this HonorableOffice.

6. As held in the caseof LemerySavingsand Loans:

"x x x It is true that the Constitution has placed a high regard for

the welfare of the labor sector.However, socialand compassionate

3
LastParagraphof Page2 of Complainant'sPositionPaperdated May 18, 2009'
 q situqtionwherebythe management
justicedoesnot contemplate

ndsto sufferfor certain misconceptions crea.tedin the mind

oI,an emploJrqe.where there is no dismissal,Iegal or illegal,no

to the employeeinvolvedis duefrom

retribution nor compensation

theemployer."

Actual Receiptof Salary from the alleged employer must

be proved; MEREOPENINGof a PayrollAccountfrom
the bank in the absence of actual payment thru deposit
in said account is NOT A PROOFOF WAGE PAYMENT.

PositionPaperdatedluly 1'4,2009,complainant
7. In his Replyto Respondents'

presenteda SignatureCard6from BancoDe Oro clairningto be a Payroll

Onthe faceof the saidsignature

Accounthe openedas an employeeof OPSEC.

card,it appearsthat saidaccountwith No. 1310081032in the nameof Tony

Brian Horn was openedon August22,2007 with an initial depositof One

HundreclPesos[P100.00). Undeniably,this documentwas presentedto

misguidethis HonorableOffice.

B. A scrutinyof the very evidences(Copiesof the SavingsAccountEnquiryBasic

AccountData, Current Stotementand SignatureCardshereto marked and

that Complainanthimself
attachedas Annexes2, 3 ,4 and 4-A respectively)

presentedwill revealthe followingpertinentinformation:

BDOSignatureCard
ACCOUNTNUMBER i 13100B1032
CUSTOMERDATA : TONYB, HORN
INITIALDEPOSIT : P100.00
DATEACCOUNT OPENED: 0B-22-07

BasicAccount Data
ACCOUNTNUMBER : 1310081032
CUSTOMERDATA : TONYB. HORN
DATEINQUIRED : March30,2009 L6:08:26
 CURRENTBALANCE .00
AVAILBALANCE .00
AVAILTOMORROW .00
ACCOUNTS'IATUS OPEN
DATEOPENED 08-22-07
LASTACTIVEDEPOSIT 08-22-07
AMOUNTLASTDEPOSIT 100.00

Current Statement
DATEINQUIRED : March30,2009
BALAsof 8-22-07 : .00
CREDIT : 100.00
CURRENT BALANCE : L00.00

g. From the abovementionedinformation,it is quiet obvious that while the

accountwas openedon August22,2007 with an initial depositof P100.00,

whether through deposit or withdrawal

said accounthas NO MOVEMENT,

from August 22, 2007 up to March 30, 2009. Simply stated,the allegecl

has NO
PayrollAccountof Complainantfor his so-calledemployerOPSEC

ORWITHDMWAL or any other activity.

ACTUALDEPOSIT

from the attachedinformationin the BasicAccountDato,the last active

L0.Based

in the nameof TonyB. Hornwas

NUMBER1310081032
depositfor ACCOUNT

made only August 22, 2007 with an initial depositof P100.00when the

payrollaccountwas actuallyopened,while its CurrentStatementtells us that

its CurrentBalanceas of March30, 2009 is P100.00,the amountwhich was

initiallydeposited19 monthsearlier.

Ll.Translatingthe aboveinformation,it meansthat the signaturecardpresented

hasNO PROBATIVE
by complainant OFACTUAL
VALUEand is NOTA PROOF

rhat may be due to a

OR REMUNERATION
PAYMENTOF COMPENSATION

real employeeduly recognizedby his true employer.Outstandingly,this

account was opened without the knowledge of OPSECnor any of the

 or paymenthas ever been appliedin the said account,from the time of its

openingup to the present,the same not being known or recognizedby

.
OPSEC.
respondent

Gomplainant'sdocumentaryevidenceswere
superflous, irrelevant and deceitful

the seemingly'overwhelming
for the complainant,
L2.Regrettably he
evidences'

adducedwere all irrelevant,insubstantialand unreliableto support a

are evenremotelyguilty of illegallydismissing

that respondents
conclusion

him. While there were loadsof professedevidencespresented,thesefigures

and documentsare not credibleand doubtful.

cardTallegedlyprovided
a. In his Reply,Complainantpresenteda business

bearinghis nameand position.In so far as

to him by respondentOPSEC

the sarne::ouldeasilybe manufactured

Cardis concerned,
the Br.lsiness

ancl fabricated. Using the latest technology in computers and

sophisticatedprinting,businesscardscan effortlesslybe duplicatedor

falsifiedin just a few minutes.

evidenceattachedin his Replyas

b. The sameappliesto Complainant's
')psec Fund Trocking'. Aside from being
Annex'?" denominatedas

irrelevant in the caseat bar, the figures and items presentedwere

blown up only to overstatea point (Copyof the Affidavit of MichelleDel

Pradoheretomarkedand attachedasAnnex5).
 c. As to the demandletter datedMarch1,6,2009sentto the Complainant,

informationthereofat that time were basedon the data relayedto the

.
undersignedcounselby respondent'snew officestaff who committed

the instructiongivento her

an honestmistakeafter shemisunderstood

with regard to the nature of engagementof the Complainant,This is

especiallyso becauseat the time said demandletter was sent - and as

the tenor of the demandletter reads,databaseand other pertinent

informationof respondent'semployeesand other consultantswere

sabotageand sometaken.So,it would be utterly unfair for respondent

to pronouncethat complainantHORNwas its employeeon that

OPSEC

officestaff 0live Biter hereto

basis(Copyof the Affidavit of respondent's

markedqnd attachedasAnnex"6".
)

The negative testimony of Rodolfo Madlangbayan

is i,aintedwith rnaiice and bad faith

1.. The negativetestimonyof RodolfoMadlangbayan in his

IMADLANGBAYAN)

datedApril 7, 2009 againstthe respondentsis tainted with

letter-Affidavite

maliceand bad faith,hence,shouldnot be given credence.It is significantto

has a pendingcasebeforethis HonorableOffice

note that MADLANGBAYAN

hereinon December
for illegaldismissalwhich he filed againstrespondents

22, 2008 docketed as NLRC Case No. RAB-lll-L2-1.4248-08(Copy

"f
Madlangbayan'sComplaintdated December22, 2008 hereto mqrked and

attachedasAnnex"7" Qnd'7-A"),

2. It is apparent that this Affidavit of Madlangbayanis a ploy intended to

damagethe respondentsas orchestratedby ComplainantHORNhimself.This

 Honorable Office cannot therefore brush aside the fact that

letter-Affidavit lacks honesty and suffers from bias.

MADLANGBAYAN's
.
very witnessshowsthat his personalinterestsleads
Evidently,Complainant's

executedhis
him to declareagainstthe respondentsas MADLANGBAYAN

letter-Affidavitafter his own casefor illegaldismissalhasbeenfiled.

thereis a dearthof evidenceto establishthefact,of Complainant's

ON THESESCORES,

Much hasbeensaid and much hqsbeenpresentedmostlyabout irrelevant

dismissal.

matters - but the fact still remainsthat the illegalityof dismissalhas never been

by the complainant.For as statedearlier,there Is NO employer-employee

established

relationshipin the engagementof a consultantbut only that of client-professional

relationship.Thus, there can be no illegal dismissalin consultancyagreements.

Logically,if there is no dismissal,then there cqn be no questionas to the legaliA or

illegaiitythereof.

ServicesCenter,Inc.,
As ruledin the caseof Machicav. Roosevelt

however,thqt the burdenof proof is

"lt is a basicrule in evidence,

on the part of the party who makesthe allegations- ei incumbit

probatio,qui dicit, non qui negat. If he claims a right, grantgd

by lqw. he must prove his claim by cqmpetent evidence.

relying on the strength of his own evidence and not upon the

weaknessof that of his opponent",

PRAYER

premises considered,respondentsrespectfullypray that

WHEREFORE,

captionedcasebe dismissedfor utter lack of merit and lack of jurisdiction.

 other reliefsand remediesjust and equitablein the premisesare prayedfor'

AngelesCity for the CitYof Sa panga,August6,2009.

E A. YTURRALDE-CHAN
Counselfor the ResPondents
Unit 4 M.A.YBuilding
No.2444Sto.EntierroStreet
Sto.Cristo,2009AngelesCitY
Rollof AttorneysNo.51097
IBPLifetimeNo.05365;05.16.2005; Pampariga
AngelesCity
No.ACF0206054;01.05.09;
P.T.R.
No.II-0005890
ComPliance
IUCLE

CopyFurnished:

TonyBrianHorn
SapangBiabas
MabalacatPamPanga
 v. -}-ttl
of LaborandEmployrnenl
- . - _ -Deparlmenl
r,tAT?otttAL
LABOR FtrLAilOl.tscrjh,$llssgt{
, Regional
Arbitritition
Branch.Ns.
ttt
pampanp
Cityof SanFsrnando,
t&*,
-Triu",l,
F.t,i,.,-r. llorn and &

. ver$us
;
ComplainanVs

NLRC
CASE
Ann4x
i-
NO,RABrII o.l- t4vw?q _p.
U AW"dr.

t.\at,n(":4?.,(J
COI4BL,{IIYT
ComplainUs
bycwnsd,respeotfully
state/s, that:
"'TA{l
the0on-rplainanl . '('r ii,,,., ),)ar...t
1 .Narneof Sq M .,e,ge
^-l\*_StatusjaeajLD-
Number
d'Comotainan/ts
ffil / tn
2, Address
3. Name ofRispondenl'
Cornpany

4,
5; N6meof0wnp"rSt Manago ( ) President
() -=,,..lir-;n isi. " ti
'7
ofBusiness
6 . Nalure P Er"i Q, . . hiumber bfy,V,o*r'_'LcC t n

8,
9.
tu. SalaryRate ofPaymenl
1 1 .,fueyouaUnion
M,eniberr
{)
Nameof Union
, ls{herelan ,{ ) Yes K No
extslingi0BA?
12,Hareyarfiledanysimilar
casedsewhere? { ) Yes $C*o
lf ye*,Where?-
fihisporlion
isio be filledupbytheCornplaint
Officer,
unless
complainantis
is wiihlogalcounset)

CAUSE OF ACTION
A. lllegalDismissal (,{ F.lllegalDeduction ( )
Aclual ( ) Speciff:
Conslructive ( )
B. tltegal$uspension
C. lllegal,LEpOff ( ) G. UnfairLaborPractice ( )
D. RegulBriaation ( ) 6pecfi:
E. Underpaymenl ft Non-Payment ( )
1. $alarleslWages aa g. Damages:
2. Ovedirne PaY h
':' 3.Hu-lidaY.Psy (& Moral&Exernplary (()
4. Premium,for , ' Actual ( )
, a. HolidaYPqY L Attomey'sFee
(tt) 4A
::i
.,'lbi.rRgril
. r.:1- i
Day
tLiJgag-.1.--a
0,a Olhers:$peciFy
J.
/l,tt
 hnnux'2'
c3-30-):,099
s
Savings TY Next Display: o2 20-0700-
| 6 - nR..t.R. sa6ic w5rJrt).t5

, : i . ' - : c o u t :N
t umber: 131_0081032 *---- - - - c u s T o M E RD A T A - - - -
' - - L : : Y 3 l l c . , .C o d e :000 PHP . TONY B HORN :
ii,c:-L )larne: HORN TONY BRIAN SAPANG BTNEAS MAtsAI,ACAT PA]VIPANGA
+ - - * - ' - - - - - . = B A t A N C ED A T A - - - - - - - - - - - _ *
.-.;:'re::L Balance :
,i-'.,.ar
1 BalanCe :
,oo
.00
I ,'a i i Tcnorrc',v : .00
':::ila ba.ieinCe:
. 0 0 Phorr-eNbr: 92',7-936-517t
*
/^":;:-;,;llllT
rhru' 8-22-07
Open
3-29-09
Business P h o
Social Secur:ity Nbr;
Tax ID Number:
n e ;

V'?7,;:xni:?=:::
- . l . i a : t c ] i r , r O fi i c e . : :
t\-€
-'--. * - . . - . - - -ACTTVITY/INTEREST DATA. - - . - - - - i
3L / 131_
br 1- a\4,1 :- 1' | : ,.1\ 41 t
0J8 "Last AcEive/DdiposiL: 0L-27-09 q8-22-0'
':
, ..L':-.-r1]its:.riF Code: , *.:- Amount Last Deposit: 100;0(
i.rl-: i- t-n',:r / 'fCrn/ar:a i / Interest Due: ' Ltt

l./lc iear:ed L,i.mit. : .00 OD InLerest Due: ' Ct

- .-.".r.1r" -ccr€: AtCn flags:

-i',,Lxi c. F? =CIoseouL data F13=Enquiry window F24=More keys

 =:-A
F
ftnn* 3
Ci-30:!009 Savi-ngs Accoqnt, Eoqlriry Next Displal': o5 ;.lo-o?oi).'
i,,i:count ltlbr: : 131008,10:J2
'Cuireirrt ,rS€atement . ers13l.5,l:
i'urrency Oode i 000 PHP BaI As Of : ,08-22-0-7 .0{
'l'1:'l'i\:3 lioiilJ +Cred: " I
'i nn
* U v
1'.r
' ! \

::.,':.i:=AliCFi:i:l\BiiS I.ABALACAT PAI,IPANGA -Debt: . ' \-' i-

-S.C. & Taxesr :i.00.0c

+Inlerest Paid: - cli
-Int Charged/Xferr .0(
Current Balance, .0i
Sr 1 Pc6t Eff TC Description Arnount Balance
I 'i'r
2 - ? . 8 9 4 S E R V T C EC H G S Y S * G E N 100.00- 1 0 0 .(

Boht(
F - l= E x i t F12 =Cancel F8=First/[,sst F 9= L a s t / F i r s L F2 0 =Fold/Unfola
F'?lsPrin $tmt
 't

f,r ll o1
rllttt e,Kj
I

il Al'{'Irv'/o

,-1

a
./ / .'-

I
I
':. ;${;
'i:: '
. ,11:,

'. _,q;t{* .. i
TI v t

1----r.

An^q1-A

ACCOUNT
JCIT'JT AGREEMENT
iFcr"Al.iDCIB"
Account)
;i_,1
.j:..r ,.,:: :;i.- .:r-, ,'(,,,ji.., rni..l:t i.rU.e.l io:ha,o r n r , : r cl r : r q ' S

,,. ij,. | !.ii :r:n a,;1rtr.!\ \] reioq:.te ihr,ri!it:\rSs nt $:i,qro ot llrn ilcFdrlcfs,tdtctlgrj . tan l.:1?
: l' : l1,:lJrrfa ctic t lf.n caynia: l': iunds r:,r rt: lil* trariga(i:en d iihar blsioqgs or |rw nia'f;r'\:
:1 r(i5ri1, .:r--{$i{f{ b! i!:a d4lrrC}itf ?. aiths 3i tlsi lo tre otdlr ti tlrit a€lutl eftall De trle ix'4re'lr
r t llf t:n 4Fft)s:rri's a,j r^j,t .:,y*ng.g. il\d iF3ll t'A p(y0bb ra nrd fit!€alioie 0y €rtte' flrs 0 ii: 9J t,ti'

"r -ri; { :t:tii

ii!i,:i{ irtlJ urcn tr,f (ltBth Dt ai!6nE fll lhg|n tltali llg D?r,e!'i€ tf th4 so*i{'r.'s JnrfS$ ::r
.r
{1,J,.r all*:6rti
,. r: r':r1 dnq\4$!;ir! 416{ iroorii !1J.tEcl.rs8 h[ dtFotil ii tlra ;*dun!, cllFcki dr'?hs, htlis::r:
.",. ,ir rlri? t,,rjrt)r 6:har :Ntr.inrstit !3, tit r.;rtflerg til fl'trtf oa]3ltlg 0.9utiflln: ro ld:trii li iqr orr
:,-: i.5{,)'r.
'
r i...i. : i..ii:'iirirl.c :t :'q'\:r 7rc ta', 1! 1i,t uDbrt Al ll:it gFcrjol, tfgiks Dt olier wlilt4nl 0160B t cr)!
. . '1;i 1it1;;1 ::! jir,il,.; .i r:."F;i ji! i.(iri:,: i)? hf, lid'f. 9i l0 lh€ U5.J,)t OiSPr)S)l\:i'M)lclr l',a! ro rila{il
' r-t.:n .
i-
- ,r i.! r.\rii {r'i liu t.:,i:i., ..iit; i.r,.i)idirt Iili,rlc lir llici Lrsyixen! t{ a.Y obligetifns 1; il: :i|i\ iir
'Ii
f, ,,,, : .r .,.r: : !i Cf.!:,.! irr ::: :l:! tr.i,Ji;':l ir 3lr i! iret at oDv lrmB fl iiJ or/i C6,:l9in1 rvltt ol
' '! r.'i ' i ieii: ;q 1., 711r; r1i lid cemsi1..*s ifliq :l, if a?|./ iEl rtirrr"l i0 tia onliroal n \+.'ri4 , lr1 L'ilri.
' rir , "ri:1):,fitr'l',Us: il,!l Ii--
ni dirf it llls BlrM trgril bnrnreril!: .rf lhfior :{rC in1ig,.i3 :f:i{t;i}r:!1{i!1{)
.,',.,, , | \n::r ,i,{ifliri(lieFi rail.rsi $A:rJt,A:ir,:f
: , I :r;.r:ili urlu ilu.Irr.J.iJ .li 3c$4 ls aslt'{f,I/cu 19 Nlmf lnn| ,r" 3ll tjltr, Itin .J4il!r5r!]r! :'t'r liiir
i,:r.. rj:Ii,i'1,.:i1lrtr,*fdi..fil;1i|a4Eltl::!oii{'4,,i51 rrrliiictrir'lirn,si$noOItleii '!uiorl:il'i:;i154:i'{

.,".'''it-%'
.ir
€.* "n
.iffi 'r.'
".''f {r.!]'|:ni1-:
REPUBLICOF THE PHILIPPINES)
In theCITY OF ANGELES )S.S.
s
InrrcX
AFFIDAVIT

I, MICHELLE DEL PRADO , of legal age, Filipino, with addressat San Nicolas,
Bamban,Tarlar, after having been sworn to in accordancewith law, hereby deposeand say:

L That I am an Accounting Personnel of OPSEC INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC.

(OPSEC),a domesticcorporationorganizedand existing under the Philippine laws with
principal addressat Unit 1116 City Land Shaw Tower Saint Francis Streetcorner Shaw
Blvd., MandaluyongCity;

2. That I read the Opsec Fund Tracking Report for the period February l, 2008 to August
o'I" in the
22, 2008 allegedly emailed by me to Pastor Tony Horn attachedas Annex
latter's Reply datedJuly 14, 2009 submittedbeforethe NLRC;

3. That after a careful evaluation of the said report, I confirm that there are differences in
the said report from my actual report that reporting of the sameis on a daily basis;

4. That I only started working in the company on April 2008 and only started doing
accountingreports after I was hired, hence, I deny having emailed Pastor Horn and
preparedreports which dates back to February 2008 considering that I was not yet
connectedwith OPSECthen.

5. That I am executingthis Affidavit in supportof whateverlegal purposeit may serveas

well asto attestto thetruthof the foregoingaverments.

AFFIANT FURTHERSAYSNONE.
AUGI 0 2009
IN WITNESSWIIEREOF,I haveherountosetmy handthis day of August,2009
in theCity of Angeles,Philippines.
H6!*J^,
MICHELLE'DEL PRADO
Affiant
AUG1 0 2009
SUBSCRIBEDAND SWORN to befoTeme this _ day of August, 2009 affiant
-[t P gqlffi
exhibitingto me her: $io ] E1 ro

R . e gN. o . i 7 q ; CorsndssionNo. 20il?-l 53

PageNo. 61 ; Notary Public until 31 Decembert
'?- FTR Nu. 02150 10/AngelesCi9"/8 lan
Bock |lc. ; I{cLl cf Atlcrrr:y i'l.c.4'5i i4
Seriesof 2009. I B P l . i f r t j : a ; " 1 1 1 ; i 1 r ; r l ltrlilp N u . 0 3 5 7 8
Unit I ;II.CS l)Idg', l'231';11vatSt.
Diam+ncl $r;bd., 13aiib*gi-',Ai:lg*!*s City
 - \-.,

REPUBLICOF THE PHILIPPINES)

In theCITY OF ANGELES )S.S.

AFFIDAVIT
IwW o
I, OLMA D. BITER, of legalage,Filipino,singlewith addressat PeacockStreet,Don
with law, herebydepose
MarianoSubd.,CaintaRizal, after havingbeenswornto in accordance
andsay:

!. ThatI am oneof the consultantof OPSECINTERNATIONALGROUPINC. (OPSEC),

a domesticcorporationorganizedand existingunderthe Philippinelaws with principal
addressat Unit 1116City Land ShawTower SaintFrancisStreetcornerShawBlvd.,
MandaluyongCity;

2. That sometimein March of the currentyear,I was directedto requestAtty. Chanto

preparea letter addressedto PastorTony Hom calling him to explain the unaccounted
funds and the production of missing databaseand pertinent information relative to
OPSEC'semployees;

3. That dueto an honestmistake,therewas an error in the informationrelayedto our legal

of Tony Horn;
counselparlicularlythe natureof engagement

4. That this was broughtaboutby the misunderstanding in the instructionsgiven to me as

well as the current situation at that time were numerouscompanyfiles were fouud
missingwhich brought about the hiring of new employeesand assignmentof new
consultants

5. ThatI am executingthis Affidavit in supportof whateverlegalpurposelt may serveas

well asto attestto the truth of the foregoingaverments.

AFFIANT FURTHERSAYSNONE.
r o ?009
IN WITNESSWHEREOF.I havehereu unatr,h$G day of August,2009
in theCity of Angeles,Philippines.

. s t$$g
SUBSCRIBEDAND SWORN to before me thiso_l jley- ust, 2009
to meher: f$S to ,.rd). ()3- t bt3 )rS_O
exhibiting

ATTY. RAENAN B.

NotaryPublicuntii s I
?TR No. 0215010/Angeles
Roil of Attor"ntYNo. 46I 14
IBF Lifetimei.{embershipID No. 03578
Unit I JRCSBldg., l-23 ArayatSt.
IDlamondSubd.,Balibago,AngclcsCity
Reg.No. 333 ;
PageNo. 6q' ;
Book No. ?- ;
Seriesof2009.
 ald

ffomplalnarUg
. _ vff$U$. NLRSCASE[!O.RABIII la,
STIffKER II{$EGRAIED
IJ;flEG} *-a$C
" $DSIl'flfi,S GSI{ ".FELTX
[N0. ' & GSI$
..GROUP
Tr.t. . GROUFINC' '^MR',
r-rMR"
rNC..r'C0. IiU.l{f,gR
riul{fl,gRHAYSSS
tsPSSCTNT'.!.
l{ANIiA S{JLORATICI\ddhcl
Em-mili,: Effi*'"
:'I1,. ,
: L,A,"Ahd&
Rwpcndenfn
X--- -...--X
. .,(,.,

COhf,ETAIFilT

'I Tl, I t

4.
5. Name
ofO;.ner,) l!te,:,,,1_*'
l I fr*idg-t{-L-"---E:':H'gsvn'e995:-i1.
D. Nalure ii --tlglgg$"" PflfS-f,
ci'Husli* "--- Nl,,rr" -f w"k;il
{. iffi*f
p4;E';pr=d ;lffiFff'ffi-
,; **:*dl*-d
8. Nature 49tl:--9!9-{q,---...--' --_. I'Tork
oflVorM::'(riiior S#,ed,,ite
-jl-a---'--'::'-A -
$. Plaoeof Vtctk*;; r '

ic. ililR-il-: G+,;by*#ffi

1 1 fueycu
. p[Jnio,ltils'ni]e#
{} F}
. NameoflUnion ';-. -.-- * -----
fslhweanuxieirng CB/f { J'Ys* (1 No ' r

12.Haveyarfiled.'rv,rsimilar:cesie
i t r
dsewhere?,
{ J Yti [4 I\10
lf yr*'Jil/here?
portion
{This ,)fftcer,
islo bslillsdupbytheOotnplr':,; unl'-s+csmplqinalUs
igVith.legsf6ounsel)
- r:i
"" ' . ' i:':':r'r' r;
,
'sAus*
$F ACTISN
: i:

A. lllegalDlsmisssJ. . frc) hr.lllegnl,f)sdtlgtlon, ( ,

; $p.eciff:
- Actual [ )
Construcilr'e ^: { }
B.ltiigaisuspen,iion ( )

!..!!lduar,,Lg\CII_ , ( )
D. Regulari.'^ation "{)
E. Unlarp"vmenl { },hlon-peyrner'rt
' 1. $algrl*s,flffaEss
fr)
{ }
ff)
3: HolidayPaY (ry
.r4.,Pre,mlulltfor,
. . ::: ,,4,t*Ugl.
a. HolidnYPaY , {* Fee
i AttorneYls
b, RestDsy { ) J #Pecift
Others:
 ' -:. .. - . ' -. , -:.-
Conpiui*ri,rtispiey
fcr tile fciiowing: : , r - . ]
Reinsl}]ler:lenl
F+/ilrontatffips#i.g
_.*{ i and
ftnnq f-n
. ' , . _ : . ' . : , . 1: , 1, . ; _,, l r . ; , . ; i . ; . ;.ii . . ,

; P0O2

end^*siethrst:
herobyCepose
I

lam th+irr.,6,.ir1htirri
iil l;i.j ab*ve-entilied
cax ;.
ra\ b
lffdg hgile rc,t srtrsh
andbeliefr:a

/./' .
.{.:ERTt ;lv
Fhnnp ldoF' $nr..',po l
Curusnodpru r
NG
TftiSis tOceitj
sgency.
Eo\rcmnrcrit