Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Meanwhile, it is daily reported how our leaders lie, cheat, steal, bully and
abuse, yet there is a reticence - for fear of retribution - to using the
appropriate description - institutionalised corruption - that has repeatedly,
relentlessly, ruthlessly, systematically and cynically destroyed the lives of
anyone arbitrarily deemed to be a potential threat.
The money from the EU was supposed to be used for regeneration, yet
swathes of deprived communities have been despoiled as the money was
diverted to pay for a nulabor social re-engineering project in keeping with EU
diktat.
Why a charity? Because charities do not attract the same level of cynicism
and scrutiny as public authorities, they are not subject to freedom of
information laws, they are easy and naive prey for the nulabor elite, and
charities are easy organisations for strategic positioning to exert influence,
interest and control far beyond their legal remit.
In addition, where the chosen leaders are placed in a charity positioned for
strategic control, they form the perfect base for money-laundering. Where
existing charities can't be taken over, they are destroyed, and new charities
created. Where charities prove themselves to be providing a needed service,
they are targeted for privatisation, and the tax-liable jobs falsely claimed to be
employment creation. There is no job creation, just transfer.
Like the EU, this nulabor government is corrupt. The nulabor corruption is
absolute, lead from the top down, imposed through all tiers of social and
government control, down to street level. Being rotten to the core and from
the core, everything it touches it taints. Having neither the ability nor
inclination to correct itself, outside intervention is indicated.
This statement can be extended to democracy itself. Perhaps it is not only the
government that must be replaced, but the style of government, as the
current flavour leaves such a bad taste. Our leading politicians, to whom we
are entitled to look for behavioural guidance, have failed to make the
distinction between what is legal and what it right. Finding a loophole to do
something does not make what is wrong, right. The very act of looking for a
loophole is evidence of intent to act amorally. It is no use saying that no rules
have been broken, and therefore the behaviour is OK. Those not acting in the
spirit of the law, or not capable of making the distinction between right and
wrong, have no place in our society, and certainly not as our leaders or
representatives in any government.
So now we have described what we have today, and how we arrived at this
sorry state.
The next question must be, WHY ? and Where is all this leading us?