"Idols" in The Temple. Icons and The Cult of Confucius. Julia K. Murray PDF

The Journal of Asian Studies
http://journals.cambridge.org/JAS Additional services for The
Journal of Asian Studies:
Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here
Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Julia K. Murray
The Journal of Asian Studies / Volume 68 / Issue 02 / May 2009, pp 371 - 411 DOI: 10.1017/S0021911809000643, Published online: 12 May 2009
Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0021911809000643 How to cite this article: Julia K. Murray (2009). Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius. The Journal of Asian Studies, 68, pp 371-411 doi:10.1017/S0021911809000643 Request Permissions : Click here
Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/JAS, IP address: 88.10.178.99 on 28 Feb 2014
The Journal of Asian Studies Vol. 68, No. 2 (May) 2009: 371411. 2009 The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. doi:10.1017/S0021911809000643

JULIA K. MURRAY
Until 1530, sculptural images of Confucius and varying numbers of disciples and later followers received semiannual sacrifices in state-supported temples all over China. The icons visual features were greatly influenced by the posthumous titles and ranks that emperors conferred on Confucius and his followers, the same as for deities in the Daoist and Buddhist pantheons. This convergence led to visual conflation and aroused objections from Neo-Confucian ritualists, culminating in the ritual reform of 1530, which replaced images with inscribed tablets and Confuciuss kingly title with the designation Ultimate Sage and First Teacher. However, the ban on icons did not apply to the primordial temple of Confucius in Qufu, Shandong. Post-1530 gazetteers publicized the distinction by reproducing a line drawing of this temples sculptural icon, and persistent replications of this image helped to popularize his cult. The same period saw a proliferation of non-godlike representations of Confucius, including his portrayal as a teacher, whose iconographic origins can be traced to a painted portrait handed down through generations of his descendants. In recent years, variations of this teacher image have become the basis for new sculptural representations, first in Taiwan, then in Hong Kong and the Chinese diaspora, and finally on the mainland. Now installed at sites around the world, statues of Confucius have become a contested symbol of Chinese civilization.
elements in the ideas, institutions, and practices associated with Confucius (Kongzi ) and his later interpreters has done much to correct long-standing representations of Confucianism as a form of secular humanism (Chen 1999; Clart 2003; Csikszentmihalyi 2001; Goossaert 2006; Jensen 1997; Wilson 2002a).1 Revisionist inquiry has also brought attention to the recurrent debates over the propriety of using icons in
ECENT SCHOLARSHIP ON RELIGIOUS
Julia K. Murray (jmurray@wisc.edu) is Professor of Art History, East Asian Studies, and Religious Studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
The convenient though problematic terms Confucian and Confucianism are used here to refer to Confuciuss teachings and their later interpretations, as well as to certain aspects of ideology, institutions, and rituals of governance in dynastic times. It seems particularly appropriate to use the terms in referring to teachings for which Confucius was considered the progenitor and whose differences from Buddhism and Daoism are articulated in Han Yus (768824) famous diatribe Source of the Way (Yuan dao ). For a fuller discussion of terms, see Mark Csikszentmihalyi (2001, 24344, 29297).
1
372
Julia K. Murray
rituals for venerating Confucius (Sommer 1994, 2002). However, the significance of the physical and visual qualities of these icons has not been addressed. No matter whether Confucianism is viewed as primarily a moral-ethical system or as a sacrificial cult mandated and supported by the state, it clearly differs from Buddhism, Daoism, and other forms of religious expression in China. Accordingly, a discussion of the materiality, visuality, and efficacy of its icons might seem unnecessary, irrelevant, or perhaps even offensive. Nonetheless, iconic images played a role in sacrifices to Confucius at least as early as the sixth century, and from 630 to 1530, sculptural icons were a standard feature of statesupported temples throughout China (Murray 2001; Wilson 1995). When influential opponents of icons finally prevailed and temples in the state cult removed the sculptural figures (Sommer 1994, 2002), alternative representations of Confucius rose in significance and took on new functions (Murray 2001, 2002). Recently, one of these has become the standard image of Confucius, in effect the icon for our age.
CONFUCIAN RELIGIOSITY
Various efforts in recent centuries to foreground the moral dimension of Confuciuss legacy have obscured practices and beliefs involving icons, along with other religious aspects of Confucianism. During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Jesuit missionaries tried to convince papal authorities in Rome that Confucianism was an ethical philosophy (Jensen 1997, 6370, 129), so that efforts to spread Christianity in China would not be stymied by requiring converts to give up rituals for worshiping Confucius Similarly, in the nineteenth century, the Protestant missionary-translator James Legge argued that the ancient Confucian classics merely needed to be supplemented with Christianity, just as the Bibles Old Testament was completed by the New Testament (Mungello 2003, 590). Moreover, from the sixteenth century onward, Confucian temples were austere buildings where inscribed tablets were displayed, unlike Buddhist temples and popular-cult shrines with sculptural icons in sensuous profusion.2 Although Kang Youwei (18581927) sought to establish Confucianism as Chinas official religion (zongjiao ) at the end of the nineteenth century, on the model of Christianity in Western nations, he made little headway before falling from power in the coup that reversed his 1898 reforms (Chen 1999; Goossaert 2005, 2006). Because regular worship of Confucius was on the official Register of Sacrifices (Sidian ), and thus was closely identified
2 Henri Dor, a nineteenth-century French Jesuit missionary, suggested that Buddhism and Daoism introduced superstitious beliefs and practices into Chinese religion (Yu 1973, 384). Dors encyclopedic compendium also included a lengthy presentation on annotated illustrations of the life of Confucius, which he considered a major means of disseminating Confucian morality among the broad populace (Dor 191138, vol. 13).
373
with the imperial system, the collapse of the Qing dynasty (16441911) undercut subsequent efforts to create a religion based on Confucianism. In the early decades of the twentieth century, some nationalist modernizers wanted to discard Confucius altogether, while others found it expedient to present him as Chinas counterpart to the Wests great rational philosophers. Suppressing what they considered to be idolatry and superstition, they emphasized a Confucius who did not concern himself with ghosts and spirits. And in recent years, global advocates of New Confucianism have focused on his ideas about self-cultivation and morality.3 To some, Confucian concepts of reciprocal responsibility in a hierarchical society suggest an Asian alternative to Western-style democracy. These different efforts have created a widespread conception of Confucianism that is defined by a set of ancient texts, the civil service examination system based on their mastery, and the promotion of social virtues such as benevolence (ren ), filial piety (xiao ), propriety (li ), and righteousness ( yi ). In addition to revisiting the arguments in favor of establishing Confucianism as the official religion for modern China (Chen 1999; Goossaert 2005, 2006), recent scholarship has begun to examine some of the important religious elements within traditional Confucianism. These include ideas about Confucius himself, as well as the rituals for venerating the man and his legacy. Lionel M. Jensen (1997, 2002), Mark Csikszentmihalyi (2001, 2002), and Thomas A. Wilson (2002a, 2002b) have explored ancient and persistent beliefs in Confucius as a heaven-sent being with superhuman powers. Huang Chin-hsing (1994) and Wilson (1995, 1996, 2002b, 2002c) have traced the evolution of an official cult for venerating Confucius and Confucian learning within the ritual institutions of the state, which constituted Chinas official religion (Taylor 1997). Ron Guey Chu (1998) and Huang Chin-hsing (2002) have evaluated recurrent debates over the details of these ritual provisions and the appropriate status to attribute to Confucius, interpreting the disputes as symptoms of an ongoing struggle between emperors and scholar-officials to define and control Confucius and his legacy. Philip Clart (2003) has analyzed popular religious cults that identify themselves as Confucian (Ru ) and use simplified forms of Confucian sacrificial liturgy. Deborah A. Sommer (1994, 2002) has examined different ways of representing Confucius in ancestral and state sacrifices, focusing particularly on the arguments raised against depicting him in sculptural icons, which were adopted into official policy in the ritual reform of 1530. In the present article, I describe the process by which sculptural icons became part of the cult of Confucius and examine reasons for their godlike visual features. Exploring the beliefs concerning agency, efficacy, and appropriateness that gradually accrued to these icons, I suggest that the representations shared conceptual premises and interpretative connotations with the potent
I use the term New Confucianism in its loosest sense; John Makeham (2003, 2554) deconstructs the movements diverse strands.
3
374
Julia K. Murray
images associated with Buddhism, Daoism, and popular-deity cults. Finally, I argue that the removal of icons from most state temples in 1530 had unintended effects that demonstrate the limits of official control over image-based practices involving Confucius. One result was that the icon of Confucius uniquely retained by the temple in his hometown of Qufu , Shandong, gained renown through woodblock-printed illustrations that circulated widely, even reaching Europe. The iconography of his seated figure dressed in imperial regalia was eventually appropriated into popular religion, representing Confucius as a deity who could be worshiped by the common people. Another consequence of removing icons from Confucian temples was to bring increased veneration to a radically different depiction, showing Confucius as a dignified standing figure who was merely human. Ultimately based on a small painting owned by his descendants, this conception circulated in hanging scroll paintings, woodblock prints, and rubbings from incised stone tablets. Local gazetteers often recorded versions of the portrayal in government schools and private academies. When the 1970s brought new demands for freestanding representations of Confucius outside mainland China, the image was translated into three-dimensional sculptural form for display at selected sites around the world. In the late twentieth century, such statues also began appearing at mainland temples and schools, prompting the China Confucius Foundation (Zhongguo Kongzi jijinhui ) to identify a need for a standard portrait (biaozhun xiang ). In 2006, the foundation unveiled a large new statue of Confucius in Qufu itself, sparking a new controversy over the validity of visual representations of Confucius and their uses.
BACKGROUND
TO THE
EMERGENCE
OF
ICONS
Early Han texts sometimes characterize Confucius as a godlike sage, the heaven-sent uncrowned king (Su wang ) (Csikszentmihalyi 2001, 2002; Elman 1990, xxvii, 20513, 24041; Jensen 1997; Wilson 1995, 2932).4 They describe supernatural elements in his nativity and his extraordinary physical appearance as signs of his destiny to order the world. He was conceived when his mother received a visit from a qilin , a fabulous beast believed to herald the arrival of a sage-king. The creature carried a jade tablet inscribed with a proclamation: The child of the essence of water will succeed the declining Zhou and become an uncrowned king (shui jing zi ji shuai Zhou er wei su wang
This conception of Confucius was particularly associated with the so-called modern texts ( jin wen whose most prominent advocate was Dong Zhongshu (ca. 179ca. 104 BCE). Advocates paid great attention to portents and read heavenly correlations even into seemingly mundane events mentioned in the classics, while believing that only a sage could have a true understanding of the workings of the cosmos.
),

).
5
375
On the night before Confucius was born, two dragons appeared above the roof; deities hovered in the sky and celestial musicians celebrated on the day of his birth. In addition to forty-nine distinguishing marks (biao ) on the newborns body, his chest bore five characters that announced, Talisman of the one created to stabilize the world (zhi zuo ding shi fu ).6 As an adult, Confucius displayed an uncanny expertise in identifying obscure ancient relics and interpreting mysterious portents. His ability to communicate with heaven enabled him to transmit the Way of the Ruler, in coded language, when he composed the Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu ), a chronicle of events in his home state of Lu . Other conceptions of Confucius emphasized his roles as a teacher and as an expert on ancient ritual, instead of as a preternaturally insightful and prescient leader who communed with heaven. In some parts of the Analects (Lun yu ), Confucius is portrayed as a human being who endured much travail and disappointment, especially while traveling the ancient states in search of a ruler who would take his advice (Csikszentmihalyi 2002).7 By the late Eastern Han period, this more mundane Confucius had largely overshadowed the superhuman figure. Nonetheless, the messianic sage was featured in the so-called apocryphal texts (weishu ) of the late Han and post-Han periods (e.g., Wang Jia 1966, 3:45). In addition, the modern text traditions retained their vitality in South China well into the Period of Disunion (Wilson 1995, 32). Furthermore, the Kong lineage perpetuated and embellished the legends in oral traditions and written genealogies, even down to the present day.8 Claiming descent from Confucius, lineage members had a vital interest in preserving a heroic conception of their ancestor and in maintaining their own cohesion (Wilson 1996). Emperors from the Han through the Qing dynasties awarded noble titles, tax exemptions, official positions, and lands to the descendants who maintained sacrifices to Confucius in Qufu. Although the earliest forms of veneration and sacrifice to Confucius occurred in funerary and memorial contexts, the observances themselves increasingly
According to Five Phases (wu xing ) theory, the Shang dynasty was associated with water and the Zhou with wood, which overcomes water. However, Confuciuss forebears were related to the Shang royal house, and water cannot overcome wood, so Confucius was destined not to rule. 6 Texts written by members of the Kong lineage (e.g., Kong Chuan ([1134] 1967, xia: 3b; Kong Yuancuo [1242] 1967, 8:4a) record six characters, adding yun to the end of the inscription, without changing its meaning. 7 Confucius seems to have multiple personalities in the Analects, which records diverse traditions transmitted by his disciples and their lineages of students; Makeham (1996) provides a convincing reconstruction of its emergence as a book in the second century BCE. 8 All Kong-clan genealogies of the last thousand years include the hagiographical legends. For early examples, see Kong Chuan ([1134] 1967, xia: 3b) and Kong Yuancuo ([1242] 1967, 8:3b4a). Contemporary Kongs maintain the stories (Kong Demao 1982, 1034; Jing 1996, 30). Literati officials did not necessarily believe in the supernatural manifestations, but they respected the long history of the accounts too much to discard them. Chen Gao (or Hao; jinshi 1487) , education intendant in the Shandong Provincial Surveillance office, made explicit comments to this effect in the first edition of the Qufu temple gazetteer (Queli zhi 1505, fanli, 1b).
5
376
Julia K. Murray
displayed the features of a deity cult. Confucius continued to receive sacrifices at his grave long past the normal period for commemorative worship (Jensen 2002, 18086; Sima 1982, 47:1945). Moreover, persons with no blood relation to him made these offerings, contrary to the customs of familial worship, which prescribed that a son should lead funerary ritesbut Confuciuss son had predeceased him. After Confucius died in 479 BCE, his disciples carried out the rites of mourning, and the especially devoted Zi Gong kept a six-year vigil in a hut beside the burial mound (Sima 1982, 47:1945). Local authorities maintained offerings at this site for generations afterward. The place where Confucius had gathered with his disciples became a memorial hall, and his personal effects were displayed there. The Grand Historian Sima Qian (14586 BCE) reported seeing the masters clothes, cap, zither (qin ), books, sacrificial vessels, and carriage in the memorial hall when he visited Qufu. In 195 BCE, the Han founding emperor Gaozu (r. 206195 BCE) performed a grand sacrifice (tailao ) to Confucius in Qufu, offering an ox, sheep, and pig, along with wine and other foodstuffs (Sima 1982, 47:194546). In 136 BCE, Han Wudi (r. 14187 BCE) canonized the textual tradition of Confucius and his followers by abolishing the posts of Erudite (boshi ) held by court scholars who were experts in texts belonging to other traditions (Wilson 1995, 29). Other Han emperors awarded posthumous titles of nobility to Confucius and gave material support to his descendants and cult, providing for semiannual sacrifices in Qufu after 169 CE (Wilson 2002c, 261). By the third century, sacrifices to Confucius were also being performed elsewhere, typically in academic settings. The first sacrifice documented outside Qufu took place in 241 CE at the imperial university (Biyong ) in Luoyang, the capital of the kingdom of Wei (22065), and several more were performed there under the Western Jin dynasty (265316) (Wilson 2002b, 74).9 During the centuries of disunion, various northern and southern regimes established state-sponsored temples in their capitals for conducting sacrifices to Confucius and his legacy.10 The Sui (581618) and Tang (618907) dynasties continued this practice in a reunified empire. The Tang founding emperor Gaozu (r. 61826) established a temple at the National University (Guozi xue ) in Changan (modern Xian, Shaanxi) and personally sacrificed there in 624 (Ouyang 1975, 1:9, 17). The Tang eastern capital at Luoyang also had an
A reference to images of Confucius and his disciples painted on the walls of the Hongdu Gate school in the Eastern Han capital in 178 may indicate that sacrifices were already being offered in Luoyang by the late second century, but the fifth-century source does not specify this (Fan 1965, 60 xia: 1998). 10 Thomas A. Wilson (2002b, 51) notes that in 454, the Liu-Song ruler Xiaowudi (r. 45264) built the first temple to Confucius south of the Yangzi River, modeled on that in Qufu (see also Li 1975, 2:47, 58). Wilson speculates that the temple stood in Kuaiji , home of several prominent Kongs, but I think it was more likely to have been in Jiankang (Nanjing.). In 489, the Northern Wei ruler Xiaowendi (r. 47199) founded a temple to Confucius in the capital at Pingcheng [modern Datong , Shanxi] (Li 1974, 3:104).
377
imperially sponsored temple. Initially, it was the Duke of Zhou , the wise regent to the young heir of the Zhou dynasty founder, who was honored as First Sage (Xian sheng ), and Confucius received sacrifice as Correlate (Pei ) and First Teacher (Xian shi ). In 628, a memorial submitted by Fang Xuanling (579648) convinced the Tang emperor Taizong (r. 62649) that sacrifices offered in a school should be directed to a teacher. Accordingly, Taizong ended sacrifices to the Duke of Zhou and designated Confucius as First Sage, with the disciple Yan Hui as Correlate and First Teacher (Ouyang 1975, 15:373, 375).11 Taizong extended the cult to lower levels of administration in 630 by requiring every prefectural and county school to build a temple to Confucius, thus creating a systematic network of state-sponsored temples (Ouyang 1975, 15:373). Located inside or adjacent to the government schools, these temples carried out regular sacrifices to Confucius twice a year, in spring and autumn. Tang ritual codes ranked the sacrifice to Confucius as one of several mid-level rites (zhong si ), prescribing specific implements, offerings, music, and participants.12 The liturgy imitated that of another mid-level state cult, the worship of the Gods of Soils and Grains (She ji ), which had existed in classical antiquity and whose rituals were prescribed in the Record of Rites (Li ji ). Because the ceremony for sacrifice to Confucius had no fixed classical form of its own, it was susceptible to innovations, and procedural details often changed. Most significantly, portrait icons were introduced into the ceremony, probably inspired by the images of the Buddha and bodhisattvas in Buddhist temples. Starting in the Tang period, the Chan Buddhist practice of using portrait effigies in memorial rituals for deceased abbots and monks (Foulk and Sharf 199394) provided an additional model that encouraged the use of icons in Confucian temples.
THE EARLIEST ICONS
OF
CONFUCIUS AND THEIR VISUAL FEATURES
Sculptural images had appeared in the Qufu temple by the sixth century, if not earlier, when Li Daoyuan (d. 527) reported that it displayed statues of Confucius flanked by two unnamed disciples holding scrolls (Li Daoyuan [527] 1984, 25:807).13 Such a triad shares the conceptual logic of a figure of the Buddha accompanied by bodhisattvas, a familiar composition in sixth-century Buddhist
Fangs memorial also pointed out that Confucius had previously been recognized as First Sage and Yan Hui as First Teacher, until the Daye era (60516) of the Sui dynasty. 12 There were three levels of state rituals; for details of the liturgy for Confucius, see Wilson (2002b, 7277). Howard J. Wechsler (1985) discusses Tang debates on ritual and the various codifications. 13 The triad is mentioned in a note in the River Si (Si shui ) section of Shuijing zhu; in citing it, the compilers of Qufu Kongmiao jianzhu (1987, 54) speculate that the flanking figures were the disciples Yan Hui and Zi Gong. Another mid-sixth-century source explicitly mentions that these two disciples accompanied Confucius in images displayed in Luoyangs National University before 534 (Yang Xuanzhi 1978, 1:1) .
11
378
Julia K. Murray
icons, as well as in Daoist imitations.14 By 541, the figures of ten disciples attended Confucius in the Qufu temple (Kong Yuancuo [1242] 1967, 10:8a11b).15 Again, the tableau suggests a conceptual counterpart in Buddhist iconography, the ten major disciples of Sakyamuni, which may have inspired the increase. The temple to Confucius in the Tang capital also housed sculptural images, probably from its inception in 619, and certainly by the eighth century. Officials who memorialized the throne on matters of ritual procedure and nomenclature rarely mentioned icons explicitly, but one episode is suggestive. In 720, Li Yuanguan pointed out to Emperor Xuanzong (or Ming Huang, r. 71256) that the ten disciples (called Ten Savants, Shi zhe ) who received sacrifices along with Confucius should be represented as seated images (zuo xiang ), not as standing attendants (li shi ). Furthermore, Li requested that seventy other disciples and followers of Confucius be portrayed in paintings on the walls of the temple, so that they, too, could receive sacrifices. Accepting Lis arguments, Xuanzong immediately issued a decree adopting these changes (Ouyang 1975, 15:375). Although no early temple icons of Confucius survive today and documentary sources rarely mention them, some of their attributes can be inferred from his posthumous status. In 1 CE, the Han emperor Pingdi (r. 1 BCE5 CE) honored Confucius by awarding him the rank of duke (gong ). From that time onward, various emperors conferred noble ranks and honorific titles on Confucius, his disciples, and the canonized later scholars who were periodically added to the temple (Wilson 1995, 2371, 25459).16 In 739, Tang Xuanzong elevated Confucius to King of Propagating Culture (Wenxuan wang ) and gave the disciples and later followers various titles, such as duke, marquess (hou ), or earl (bo ) (Ouyang 1975, 15:37576). These posthumous ranks had considerable bearing on the visual features of the temple images. Sumptuary regulations specified the kinds of clothing, headgear, and ornamentation appropriate for each rank, as well as the number and kinds of vessels, music, and dancers to be used in sacrifices. As king, Confucius was to be portrayed wearing a robe embroidered with nine emblems and a crown with nine strings of jade beads hanging at the front and back (Kong Zhaoxi [1897] 1990, 8a [623]). Some later rulers sought to exalt Confucius beyond the rank of king, but ministerial opposition prevented them from doing so. For example, in 1008, the Song
An important cache of early Buddhist images was recently found in Shandong not far from Qufu (Nikel 2002). Stanley K. Abe (2002, chap. 5) reproduces early Daoist votive images that also were inspired by Buddhist models. 15 Kong Yuancuo excerpted this information from a stele inscription, dated 541 (Eastern Wei), by Li Ting (zi Zhongxuan or ), who restored the temple while serving as regional inspector of Yanzhou . Kong Yuqi ([1689] 1983, 7:1a8b [652-76652-79]) transcribes more of the stele and describes the evolution of iconic representations in detail, in response to the questions posed by the Kangxi emperor (r. 16621722) during his 1684 visit to Qufu. 16 Valerie Hansen (1990, chap. 4) discusses the principles involved in imperial awards of titles and honors to various gods during the Song period, when the practice was greatly expanded.
14
379
emperor Zhenzong (r. 9971022) wanted to confer the title of emperor (di ) on Confucius. Senior officials were able to dissuade him by arguing that no such designation had existed during Confuciuss lifetime (Zhang Tingyu et al. [1739] 1974, 50:1299). Left unstated but surely significant is the fact that scholar-officials would no longer be allowed to worship Confucius if he were promoted to emperor, because he would have to receive the highest level of state sacrifice, which only the ruler could offer (Wilson 2002c, 268). Although Zhenzong was unable to raise Confuciuss posthumous rank, he added the words Dark Sage (Xuan sheng ) to the kingly title. The epithet alludes to apocryphal legends about Confuciuss supernatural nature and powers, and in 1013, Zhenzong changed it to Ultimate Sage (Zhi sheng ).17 A black-faced, ferociouslooking sculptural icon preserved in the Confucian temple in Pingyao , Shanxi, may reflect iconography specific to the Dark Sage.18 Even without elevating Confuciuss rank, some emperors conferred higher honors on him by enhancing his visual representation or aggrandizing his sacrificial ceremony. In 1009, Zhenzong ordered a jade scepter to replace the wooden tablet held by the sculptural effigy in the Qufu temple (Kong Chuan [1134] 1967, shang: 20a). A century later, the Song emperor Huizong (r. 11001125) had the nine strings of jade on the crown increased to twelve, and the Jin emperor Shizong (r. 116189) augmented the emblems on the robe from nine to twelve (Kong Zhaoxi [1897] 1990, 8b [624]).19 These changes in the icons attributes visually upgraded the uncrowned king to an emperor. In the late fifteenth century, two Ming rulers also expanded the number of vessels and dancers in the semiannual sacrificial ceremonies to an imperial level, again without altering Confuciuss kingly title.20
17 Wilson (2002b, 4748, 5152) discusses legends about Confucius related to the term Xuan sheng and the possibility that it was changed because the character Xuan became taboo (as part of the personal name of an ancestor of the Song royal house). 18 Partially reproduced and briefly discussed in Da zai Kongzi (1991, 33334). Attributed to the Yuan period, the sculpture stands in a hall built during the Jin dynasty in 1163, but the condition of the icon suggests a much more recent date. Another black-faced statue of Confucius was reported by John Henry Gray, a late nineteenth-century Western visitor to the famous White Deer Grotto Academy (Bailudong shuyuan ) in Nanchang , Jiangxi (Meskill 1982, 49, 176 n. 25). 19 A contemporary account by a forty-seventh-generation descendant active at the time places Huizongs edict requiring images to have twelve strings and nine emblems in 1107 (Kong Chuan [1134] 1967, shang: 27b28a). According to the gazetteer Queli zhi (1505, 6:2b), which dates the change to 1105, images incorporating proper regalia were subsequently depicted, carved, and distributed to all the prefectural (zhou ) and county (xian ) schools. Writing in the mid-eighteenth century, sixty-ninth-generation descendant Kong Jifen ([1762] 1966, 12:2ab [211212]) affirmed that the sculptural icon of Confucius had a crown with twelve strings of jade, a garment with the twelve emblems, a zhen gui jade tablet, and faced south (like an emperor), while the subsidiary figures had lesser emblems and faced east or west. 20 In 1476, the Chenghua emperor (r. 146587) increased the vessels from ten to twelve, and the rows of dancers from six to eight; in 1496, the Hongzhi emperor (r. 14871505) raised the total number of dancers to seventy-two, making them consistent with the procedures for a Son
380
Julia K. Murray
AND
CONVERGENCE WITH OTHER CULT IMAGES
OPPOSITION
TO
ICONS
Confucius was by no means the only recipient of imperial recognition. Emperors also bestowed noble ranks and titles on deities in the Daoist and popular-cult pantheons.21 Some of these figures gained imperial designations, and many others were kings. Accordingly, the highest-ranking Daoist and cult images were also portrayed with imperial regalia, such as the Jade Emperor depicted in figure 1. Although the icon of Confucius resembled these other emperors and kings, the visual similarities masked great differences in significance and function. Ordinary men and women could worship Daoist, Buddhist, and popular-cult deities, seeking benefits for themselves and their families. By contrast, Confucius and his canonized followers were not efficacious gods who did things for individual supplicants, but conferred benefit to society at large; moreover, only a restricted male elite could perform the sacrifices.22 These ceremonies were intended to provide sustenance to the spirits of the men enshrined in the temple, as well as to enable participants to express their reverence for the entire canon of learning and ritual represented by Confucius, his disciples, later scholars, and statesmen. During the sacrifice, icons might help the celebrant visualize the spirits coming and accepting the offerings. A successful performance brought blessings to the entire realm. However, it was hard to prevent Confucian temple icons from triggering beliefs and expectations associated with representational images belonging to other religious contexts. The convergences in visual culture gave rise to beliefs that were not grounded in ancient sources, as well as to embellishments of Confuciuss life. One idea undoubtedly inspired by Buddhism is that Confucius was born with forty-nine unusual bodily features, echoing and outdoing the thirty-two a marks that distinguished the Buddha S kyamunis body from those of ordinary 23 mortals. Another is that Confuciuss spirit was constrained by the physical
of Heaven (ru tianzi zhi zhi ) (Zhang Tingyu et al. [1739] 1974, 50:129798; see also Standaert 2006, 8485, 163 n. 38). 21 Romeyn Taylor (1990) provides a useful overview of the late imperial form of the relationships among state sacrifices, institutional religions, and popular cults; Hansen (1990, chap. 4) discusses imperial awards of titles and honors to the various gods; and Liu Yang (2001) details the conflation of imperial imagery into Daoist iconography. 22 Wilson (2002b, 44 n. 3) cites edicts of 1438 and 1836, outlawing statues of Confucius in Daoist and Buddhist temples, as evidence that he was occasionally worshiped by other social groups. By the late Qing, popular votive woodblock prints indicate that a godlike Confucius had developed some popular following; cf. figures 7 and 8. In the twentieth century, students in Japan as well as in China sought aid from Confucius for success on examinations. This practice has burgeoned on the mainland in recent years. 23 See, e.g., Kong Chuan ([1134] 1967, xia: 3b) and Kong Yuancuo ([1242] 1967, 1:1); Kong Yuqi ([1689] 1983, 7:5b [652-78]) claims that a portrait made by Confuciuss disciple Zi Gong recorded the forty-nine bodily marks. They are listed and explained by Dor (191138, 13:26) with reference to a nineteenth-century manual on physiognomy. The idea that Confuciuss body was
381
Figure 1. The Jade Emperor, detail of painting on the east wall of the Hall of Three Purities (Sanqing dian ), in the Palace of Eternal Joy (Yongle gong ) Daoist temple, Yuan dynasty, dated 1325. Source: Shanxi siguan bihua [Murals in Shanxi temples], comp. Chai Zejun (Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 1997), 198:121.
382
Julia K. Murray
features of his sculptural icon. Once enlivened by a consecration ritual, a Buddhist image literally became the deity and could wield his powers (Kieschnick 2003, 5663; Sharf 1996, 26167). The gods of popular cults were also believed to inhabit their images (Hansen 1990, 5354). The infiltration of such concepts and the danger that they would debase the cult of Confucius prompted Song and Ming Neo-Confucian ritualists to formulate objections to the presence of anthropomorphic images in the temple. The first signs of opposition to icons of Confucius in the state cult emerged as part of a larger argument against using images in sacrifices that had originated in antiquity (Ebrey 1991; Sommer 1993, 1994, 2002). Authoritative classical texts on ritual, most notably the Etiquette and Rites (Yi li ) and Record of Rites, did not mention portraits in the procedures for making offerings to ancestral spirits, heavenly forces, or worthy men of ancient times. Major Song thinkers such as Cheng Yi (10331107) and Zhu Xi (11301200), as well as ordinary officials, were eager to separate these kinds of rituals from the practices they associated with Buddhism, Daoism, and popular cults (Ebrey 1989, 3012; Neskar 1996, 293300). Zhu also argued explicitly against sacrificing to images of Confucius (Chan 1989, 400401; Sommer 2002, 108). An additional concern was whether sculptures or paintings could ever provide a sufficiently faithful likeness of any deceased person for celebrants to experience the presence of his spirit and enter into communion with him (Sommer 2002). Classical texts indicated that in antiquity, a lineal descendant of the deceased played the role of personator of the dead (shi ) during the ceremony, using his blood connection and physical resemblance to evoke the departed ancestor. In order for a portrait to serve as an effective substitute, it had to be accurate, or else the offering would go astray. As Cheng Yi famously proclaimed, perhaps hyperbolically, a mistake in depicting even a single hair would cause the wrong spirit to come down to receive the sacrifice.24 Because images of Confucius were made so long after his lifetime, they could hardly be faithful representations, and no two looked exactly alike. The portrayals were invented by later artisans and not based on direct observation. The visual features of the sculptural icons of Confucius also contradicted the details of his life and displayed elements anachronistic to the material culture of his day. Not only were there no chairs in the late Eastern Zhou period, even the most reliably documented portraits showed him wearing the clothing of the Han and later
physically distinctive predated Buddhism, but the specification of forty-nine marks reflects Buddhist influence. The attribution of a larger number to Confucius implied that he was superior to the Buddha. 24 Cheng Yi, Yi shu [Surviving Writings], 22A:7a; quoted by Deborah A. Sommer (2002, 113), who considers Chengs statement a literal prescription for accurate ancestral portraits. I believe instead that he was making an extreme statement in order to emphasize his point that it was impossible for a fabricated image ever to be adequate for ritual use.
383
periods (Queli zhi seventeenth-century ed., 1:6a; Kong Yuqi [1689] 1983, 7:11ab [652-81]). And, of course, Confucius had never been a king, much less an emperor. Icons that represented him in the regalia appropriate to the honors that had been posthumously bestowed on him conflicted egregiously with well-known biographical details. Another line of argument reveals that even very sophisticated men subconsciously equated the sculptural icons in the Confucian temple with the spirits that descended to receive sacrifice during the ceremony. In accord with classical ritual procedures, offerings of food and wine were placed on a mat on the ground. Because the icon of Confucius depicted a figure seated on a chair, both Zhu Xi and Song Na (131090) worried that his spirit would have to crawl to reach the nourishment (Sommer 2002, 1067).25 Underlying this fear was their presumption that his spirit took on the properties of its anthropomorphic representation. The notion that Confuciuss spirit entered and became the seated figure reflects the influence of Buddhism. Although the sculptural images of Confucius were not supposed to be considered embodiments of the sage, but merely representations to help evoke his spirit, this distinction was blurred by their visual and material similarities to Buddhist icons. At the most fundamental level, however, Neo-Confucian ritualists were opposed to icons in the Confucian temple simply on principle: Classical texts did not prescribe a role for images in the performance of sacrificial rites. Even the authors of a treatise on the Qufu temple and its rituals acknowledged that icons had been incorporated only in recent centuries: Setting up images to serve the spirits was not [done in] antiquity. It must postdate the end of the personator ritual (Queli zhi 1505, 9:50a). Neo-Confucian ritual experts did not necessarily object to representations of Confucius in other contexts; Zhu Xi himself reportedly bowed daily to a sculptural portrait of Confucius, presumably an image kept in his home.26 Rather, they believed that the presence of anthropomorphic images altered the character of the formal sacrifice, obstructing its evocation of the grandeur of the Way that Confucius had transmitted from the ancient sages. Indeed, Qiu Jun (142195) argued that the object of the sacrifice was the Way itself, not the flesh-and-blood Confucius (Sommer 1993; Wilson 1996, 566). Figural icons threatened to reduce a profound spiritual encounter to a mundane, sensual experience that would have no transformative power. As Song Na observed, anthropomorphic images profaned the ineffable realm of invisible spirits and could not convey their virtues (Sommer 2002,
25 This argument drew upon Su Shis (10361101) observation concerning sacrifices in general, that it was incongruous to place offerings on the floor for images over an altar. 26 Sommer (2002, 109), quoting Zhu Xis son-in-law Huang Gan (11511221). Zhu Xis ambivalence about icons of Confucius comes out in a text for his White Deer Grotto Academy, quoted by Kong Yuqi ([1689] 1983, 7:5b [652-78]).
384
Julia K. Murray
11011). Because literati officials repeatedly revived the charge that the use of icons had come to China with Buddhism, the issue continued to rankle. Perhaps finding this view threatening to their special status, Kong writers carefully maintained accounts of the lineages various images of Confucius. In addition, Kong Yuqi ([1689] 1983, 7:5a7b [652-78652-79]) and Kong Jifen ([1762] 1966, 12:10b11a [228229]) presented forceful arguments in defense of icons, citing cases from the late Zhou to early Han in which representational images were created or used in sacrificial rituals, before the purported introduction of Buddhism in the reign of Han Mingdi (5775).
STAGES
IN THE
REMOVAL
OF
ICONS
In 1382, the Ming founding emperor, Taizu (r. 136898), built a new Confucian temple for the imperial university in his capital at Nanjing. At the urging of his advisor, Song Lian (131081), he ordered that the temple be furnished not with portrait icons but only with wooden tablets inscribed with the names and titles of Confucius, his disciples, and later followers and scholars (Sommer 2002, 106).27 However, Taizu did not require other Confucian temples to get rid of their images, nor did he remove the posthumously conferred noble ranks and honorific designations. By contrast, when he reformed another mid-level state cult, the worship of city gods (Cheng huang ), Taizu abolished noble titles and anthropomorphic representations from all city-god temples (Taylor 1990, 10910). As personifications of natural forces, the city gods did not have well-established individual identities.28 But Confucius and his followers had been men who walked the earth in historical times, and the desire for images of them remained strong. When the Yongle emperor (r. 140124) refurbished the Nanjing temple in 1410, he abandoned his fathers principled aniconism and allowed representational images to be added. After he shifted the Ming capital to Beijing in the 1420s, he permitted the refurbishing of the icons in the imperial universitys Confucian temple, which had been built under Mongol rule (Sommer 2002, 11718). Starting in the middle Ming period, opponents of icons in the Confucian temple began to characterize them explicitly as a Buddhist influence. During the Tianshun era (145764), the Suzhou prefect Lin E (142376) refused to repair the dilapidated clay statues in the prefectural schools temple of Confucius, stating,
Song Lian had presented his recommendation in a 1371 memorial, On the Confucian Temple (Kongzi miaotang yi ), which is discussed by Huang Chin-hsing (2002, 276). Kong Yuqi ([1689] 1983, 7:6ab [652-78]) strongly rebuts Songs arguments. 28 Taylor (1990, 14849) suggests that certain official-cult nature gods had developed personifications with a popular following, such as the God of Taishan , whose local temples were run by Daoist priests.
27
385
Clay images are not an ancient practice They are nothing but earth. How are they the sages and worthies? Confucius was born before Buddhism entered China. Who knew of these so-called images then? (Gu [1658] 1963, 535; Taylor 1990, 141). Following the precedent set by Ming Taizu in the Nanjing Confucian temple, Lin installed inscribed wooden tablets instead. A few years later, Qiu Jun appealed to anti-Mongol sentiment in his polemic against icons in the Confucian temple at the Beijing imperial university (Sommer 1993; 2002, 11825). He claimed not only that Buddhist influence had interpolated images into classical rituals but also that Mongol patronage during the Yuan dynasty had caused alien religious practices to become entrenched. To Qiu, the presence of icons in the Confucian temple signified a foreign debasement of the native practice, which was to use a tablet to represent the recipient of a sacrifice. However, Qiu did not press to remove images from temples associated with schools at the lower levels of government. His main concern was with the temple in the capital, where the emperor himself sometimes performed the sacrifice (Sommer 2002, 123). As Sommer has pointed out (2002, 12324), Qiu Jun evidently attributed a form of embodiment and agency to anthropomorphic representations that he did not associate with inscribed tablets. He believed that it violated protocol for the emperor to bow before sculptural images of Confucius and his followers because these men had all been of lower ranks. However, Qiu did not object to the emperors veneration of tablets inscribed with the names of those same commoners. Although Qiu disparaged sculptural icons as inanimate and worthless objects of clay, arbitrarily fashioned by artisans, he must have sensed that such images made their referents present more effectively than inscribed tablets did. If only at an unconscious level, Qiu equated the icons with the men they represented, which suggests that even an arch foe of Buddhism could not avoid being influenced by the Buddhist idea that the image embodied the deity. Accordingly, Qiu was less concerned about removing icons from prefectural and county temples because only ordinary officials and scholars sacrificed there; the emperor did not. Although Qiu Juns arguments went nowhere during his lifetime, they were revived and finally adopted in 1530, when the Jiajing emperor (r. 152266) issued a decree requiring that images be removed from all Confucian temples, which henceforth were to display only the inscribed tablets. At the same time, the emperor abolished the noble titles held by Confucius, his disciples, and later followers, replacing them with designations that shifted emphasis to the teaching and transmission of the Way. Confucius was now titled Ultimate Sage and First Teacher (Zhisheng xianshi ), and the others were variously Correlates, Savants (Zhe), Former Worthies (Xian xian ), and Former Scholars (Xian ru ). Even if a few state temples dodged the order to destroy their images
386
Julia K. Murray
by constructing a false wall in front of them, the shift to reliance solely on inscribed wooden tablets was remarkably thorough.29 At the same time, the number of vessels was reduced from twelve to ten, and the rows of dancers from eight to six (Zhang Tingyu et al. [1739] 1974, 50:1298). Huang Chin-hsing (2002) has argued that the Jiajing emperor used the issue of appropriate rites for Confucius as an opportunity to consolidate his dominance over capital officials, who had opposed his desire to incorporate his natural parents into the rituals venerating his imperial ancestors.
THE SURVIVAL
AND
RENEWAL
OF THE
QUFU TEMPLE ICON
Significantly, the imperial order to remove icons made an exception for the temple of Confucius in his hometown of Qufu (Kong Yuqi [1689] 1983, 7:7b [652-79]). This temple not only participated in the state cult but also was associated with Confuciuss flesh-and-blood descendants (Wilson 1996, 2002b), and ritualists had come to accept the use of portraits in familial worship (Stuart and Rawski 2001, 3549). Nonetheless, government officials performed semiannual sacrifices at the Qufu temple, which also enshrined more than 150 men unrelated to the Kongs. The main sacrificial hall (Dacheng dian ) displayed sculptural images of Confucius, the Four Correlates, and the Ten Savants, while the Former Worthies and Former Scholars were depicted in paintings in the two long corridors along the east and west sides of the forecourt. The icon of Confucius continued to display imperial attributes, despite the apparent contradiction with his changed title, perhaps to ensure that visually, at least, he outranked his ennobled descendants. Since 739, the most senior Kong in each generation had been a duke, initially titled Duke of Propagating Culture (Wenxuan gong ), and after 1055, Duke of Perpetuating the Sage (Yansheng gong ) (Wilson 2002b, 63, 67). Whatever the reason, the Qufu image preserved the visual similarity between Confucius and the high gods of the Daoist and popular pantheons. The continued presence of icons after 1530 made the Qufu temple unique, even though the temple at the imperial university in Beijing was ritually more important because the emperor regularly sacrificed there.30 Post-1530 editions of the Qufu temple gazetteer, Queli zhi , called attention to this new
29 Sommer (2002, 12627) quotes a widely repeated assertion by Gu Yanwu (161382) that some temples hid their images after 1530 rather than demolishing them. John Meskill (1982, 49) suggests that private academies might have kept images. The Japanese Confucian scholar Hayashi Razan (15831657) installed icons of Confucius and the Four Correlates in his academys temple in 1632; and sculptural icons of Confucius and Ten Savants were displayed in the Yushima Seido , the Tokugawa shoguns temple in Edo, founded in 1690 and depicted in a contemporary painting (Yushima Seido to Edo jidai 1990, cat. B7). 30 On very rare occasions, an emperor journeyed to Qufu to offer sacrifice, usually in conjunction with a visit to Taishan to perform the even more important feng and shan sacrifices; but
387
Figure 2. Line drawing of the Qufu temple icon of Confucius, titled Portrait of the Great-Completion Ultimate Sage and Culture-Propagating First Teacher, Master Kong (Dacheng zhisheng wenxuan xianshi Kongzi zhi xiang ), early Qing, c. 1647, woodblock print. Queli zhi , expanded edition of Kong Yinzhi , juan shou. Source: Regenstein Library, University of Chicago.
distinction by reproducing a line drawing of the sculptural icon of Confucius at the beginning of the book (figure 2).31 Portrayed as a frontal and symmetrical figure with a heavy beard, Confucius sits regally on a curved-back throne with an ornate footrest. Solemn in expression, he holds a pointed tablet in front of
none of the Ming emperors made the effort. By contrast, most of them managed to make the short excursion to the Confucian temple at the imperial university at least once during their reigns. 31 The line drawing of the icon, which does not record the size, medium, or color, appears in Kong Zhencongs twelve-juan edition of Queli zhi, completed in 1599 and printed in 1609, and in Kong Yinzhis (15921647) mid-seventeenth-century edition in twenty-four juan. Although these later editions preserved core material from the original 1505 compilation by the high official Chen Gao, the Kong lineages vested interest in the Qufu temple is evident from the fact that the compilers of later editions were eminent Kong clansmen; Kong Yinzhi was the sixty-fifth-generations Duke of Perpetuating the Sage.
388
Julia K. Murray
his chest. His robe displays imperial emblems, such as the sun, moon, and Big Dipper on the shoulders, and dragons and mountains on the voluminous sleeves. Twelve strings of beads hang from both ends of his mortarboard-shaped crown, which is foreshortened so that the back is not visible. Except for the inscribed title that identifies the figure as Confucius, the image could easily be taken for one of the high gods of religious Daoism (cf. figure 1). In 1724, a fire in the Qufu temple devastated the main hall and destroyed the sculptural icons. To assist with the repairs, the Yongzheng emperor (r. 172335) sent a team of palace artisans to create replacements for the images of Confucius and the Four Correlates, which were completed in 1730 (Kong Jifen [1762] 1966, 12:10ab [222228]; Xichao xinyu [1824] 1984, 9:1b [366]). The similarity between figures 2 and 3, as well as a late Ming description (Bi Ziyan 1983, 3:26a [1293-447]), suggest that the 1730 replacements faithfully preserved iconographic details. The illustration in Queli zhi (i.e., figure 2) probably served as the specific model for the replacement (figure 3). Rather than simply modeling clay figures over a wooden armature, the sculptors used the unsupported method (tuo tai fa , literally discarded-embryo technique), which created a hollow space inside the sculptures.32 Silver organs, bronze mirrors, and old editions of the Confucian classic books were placed there, suggesting yet another way in which Confucian icons were affected by Buddhist practices. Such deposits were often placed inside an interior cavity of a Buddhist sculptural image to help empower the image or make offerings to the deity (Kieschnick 2003, 6263; Shen 2000). Qufu temple documents do not mention the concealed objects, and it is unclear whether the previous set of icons had also contained them. The hidden deposits briefly came to light only in November 1966, during the Cultural Revolution, when Red Guards smashed the Qing sculptures and discovered the objects inside. Unfortunately, the deposited objects were almost immediately destroyed (Wang Liang 2002, 391; Yazi 1991, 13839, 168).
WOODBLOCK PRINTS
AND THE
POPULARIZATION
OF
CONFUCIUS
Although the Jiajing emperor intended his 1530 reform to put an end to inappropriately godlike representations of Confucius, the continued existence of the sculptural icon in the Qufu temple prevented this iconography from disappearing. Coinciding with the sixteenth-century boom in woodblock printing and book publishing, the ban on representational images in all other Confucian
The translation of tuo tai fa (literally, embryo-removal technique) as unsupported method was suggested by an anonymous reviewer for the JAS. The technique was used most often to make hollow dry-lacquer images, in which raw lacquer is applied to a cloth over an unfired clay model of the desired figure; after the lacquer has dried and hardened, the clay is chipped out. The term could also be used to describe a technique for modeling an image in clay and removing some of the interior material when the form has dried.
32
389
Figure 3. Sculptural icon of Confucius (now destroyed) in the main sacrificial hall (Dacheng dian ), Temple of Confucius, Qufu, Shandong. Qing, 1730. Photo by Stphane Passat, 1913. Source: Chine, 19091934, comp. Muse Albert Kahn (Boulogne-Billancourt: Le Muse, 2001), 1:622.
temples made the Qufu image unique, and thus interesting. Versions of the linedrawn illustration in Queli zhi reproducing the icons visual features circulated widely during the late Ming and Qing periods, even reaching Europe, where the image was copied and given more naturalistic rendering, shading, and contour to make it look more like a seated human being (figure 4). Pictures in woodblock printed books and on single sheets also spread awareness of the godlike icon to broader segments of Chinese society, facilitating Confuciuss
390
Julia K. Murray
Figure 4. Engraving of Confucius inscribed with praise by Voltaire (16941778), by Isidore Stanislas Helman (17431806), from Abrg historique des principaux traits de la vie de Confucius, clbre philosophe chinois; orn de 24 estampes in 4, graves par Helman, daprs des dessins originaux de la Chine, envoys Paris par M. Amiot, missionaire Pkin et tirs du cabinet de Mr. Bertin (Paris, 1788). Source: Regenstein Library, University of Chicago.
incorporation into popular religious practices that differed from the rarified sacrificial rituals enacted in Confucian temples. Besides appearing prominently in various reprints and expansions of the Qufu temple gazetteer Queli zhi, the illustration of the sculptural icon also was
391
Figure 5. Line drawing of the Qufu temple icon of Confucius, entitled Ultimate Sage and First Teacher, Master Kong (Zhisheng xianshi Kongzi ), Qing period, woodblock print. L Weiqi , Shengxian xiangzan , 1837 edition. Source: National Diet Library, Tokyo.
copied into later editions of another book, L Weiqis (15871641) Shengxian xiangzan (Portraits and Encomia for the Sage and Worthies). First published in 1632, the work was a compendium of line-drawn images and eulogies for Confucius, the disciples, and canonized later Confucian scholars. The picture of the temple icon (figure 5) was inserted at the beginning of the 1832 edition and annotated as copied from the True Visage in Qufu
392
Julia K. Murray
(lin Qufu zhenrong ), indicating that the book was published elsewhere.33 This notation was removed in the 1878 edition, which was published in Qufu by Kong Xianlan ( juren 1862), a seventy-second-generation member of the Kong lineage.34 Perhaps he considered it unnecessary to provide such detailed information about the familiar icon, but he may also have thought it did not represent the true visage of his ancestor. As I discuss in the next section, Kong family publications since the twelfth century had recorded a small painting of Confucius and his disciple Yan Hui as the most faithful (zui zhen ) depiction of the master (Kong Chuan [1134] 1967, xia: 3b4a; Kong Jifen [1762] 1966, 12:3a [213]; Murray, forthcoming). The illustration of the Qufu temple icon differed significantly from the other pictures in Shengxian xiangzan. L Weiqis original compendium reproduced a famous set of stone tablets made in 1156 for the Southern Song imperial university, which later became the Hangzhou prefectural school.35 Unlike the Qufu sculpture, the incised tablets portrayed Confucius seated in three-quarter profile on a low dais and dressed in unadorned robes (figure 6). Gesturing with one hand and holding a long, curved scepter with the other, he appears to be addressing the seventy-two disciples, who are arrayed before him in a long line of lively figures.36 The Hangzhou tablets were not used in temple sacrifices but were displayed in the school building to inspire the students to cultivate virtue
The name Hall of the Three Rarities (Sanxi tang ) appears in the lower margin (banxin throughout this edition, perhaps indicating that it was published by the Qing palace in Beijing. A hall of that name was the private studio of the Qianlong emperor (r. 173596). Zhen in zhenrong may sometimes mean ideal or perfect rather than realistic in a literal sense (Zeitlin 2005, 406 n. 30). 34 The title page of the 1878 edition of Shengxian xiangzan has a notation stating that the blocks were stored in the Gathered Culture Hall (Huiwen tang ) in Qufu. 35 Huang Yongquan (1963) and Beijing tushuguan cang huaxiang taben huibian (1993, 1:876) reproduce rubbings of the extant tablets; I have analyzed their creation and transmission (Murray 1992). Originally commissioned by the Song emperor Gaozong in 1156, the incised tablets reproduced eulogies (zan ) personally composed by that emperor and idealized portraits by an unnamed court artist (or artists) for all seventy-three figures. By the mid-fifteenth century, the images had gained an attribution to a famous literati painter, Li Gonglin (c. 10491106). L Weiqi used other sources for images of the many later men who had been added to the temple cult after 1156 and composed eulogies for them himself. The most recent figure in the compendium is Wang Yangming (14721529; jinshi 1499), who entered the temple in 1584. 36 Although the depiction of Confucius in the Hangzhou tablets superficially resembles images of r the learned Buddhist layman Vimalak rti in his debate with the bodhisattva Majus , the two figures differ significantly in posture. Confucius sits on the soles of his feet, with both legs folded beneath him, while Vimalak rti was frequently portrayed sitting cross-legged, sometimes with one knee up, and displaying his feet (e.g., Barnhart et al. 1997, 73 fig. 67). According to Zhu Xi, the cross-legged posture was a Buddhist innovation that went against ancient decorum, which was represented by Confuciuss way of sitting (Kong Yuqi [1689] 1983, 7:5ab [652-78]). In fact, a more likely inspiration for the Hangzhou portrayal was the long-lost stone image of Confucius to which Zhu Xi referred, which many believed had been installed by Wen Weng (fl. second century BCE) in his academy at Chengdu . J. Michael Farmer (2000) deconstructs this and other widespread myths about Wen.
)
33
393
Figure 6. Portrait of Confucius, from Portraits and Eulogies of Confucius and Seventy-Two Disciples, Southern Song, 1156, detail of rubbing from an incised stone tablet in the Temple of Confucius, Hangzhou. Source: Huang Yongchuan (1963, 2).
and loyalty, as the preface by the Song emperor Gaozong (r. 112762) makes clear. Similarly, L Weiqi prefaced his Shengxian xiangzan by stating that scholars of his own day needed images to remind them of fundamental values and prevent them from straying into Buddhism, Daoism, and even Christianity (L 1632, xu: 3b 4b). The animated and engaging figures contrast sharply with the static pose and hieratic frontality of the Qufu temple icon, which suggests a conception of Confucius as remote and eternal, consistent with its ritual function.37
37
The portrayal of Confucius with his seventy-two disciples focuses attention on his teaching and its transmission, and these images may be compared with the incised tablets illustrating his life and
394
Julia K. Murray
Before photographs of the Qufu temples sculptural icon of Confucius made it widely known in the twentieth century (e.g., figure 3), woodblock-printed images were the primary means of spreading knowledge of it (e.g., figures 2 and 5). The hieratic frontality and clearly depicted emblems of rank and potency marked Confucius as a god comparable to the Jade Emperor (figure 1), which undoubtedly helped stimulate interest in worshiping him. Moreover, late nineteenth-century efforts to popularize his cult encouraged ordinary people to incorporate Confucius into the heterogeneous pantheon of efficacious deities (Chen 1999; Clart 2003). Although Confucius never became as important in this respect as Buddhist, Daoist, and popular-cult gods, votive prints from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries suggest that people did worship him in homes and village schools (Kongzi baitu 1997, 12). Some of these prints, called New Year pictures (nian hua ), were pasted above altars and on walls at the beginning of each year, providing a focus for veneration and offerings of incense throughout the year. Others, sometimes called paper horses (zhi ma ), were intended for use in a single worship ritual and were burned immediately afterward, to send them to the spirit world.38 Surviving examples show that Confucius was sometimes the primary object of worship, while others include him as just one of many deities in a pantheon print. The first of two popular prints reproduced here, made for one-time use, depicts Confucius with imperial attributes (figure 7) and is clearly based on the Qufu temple icon. However, the image has been vernacularized with conventions of the popular-print genre and closely resembles votive images of Daoist and popular gods (see, e.g., Po 1992; Rudova 1988; Wang Shucun 1992). The powerful features of Confuciuss outsize face convey crude vigor, not decorous serenity, rendering him remarkably similar to Lord Guan (Guan di ) (Po 1992, nos. 2122; Rudova 1988, nos. 6, 22) or even to the deified Ox King (Niu wang ) (Po 1992, no. 28; Wang Shucun 1992, 21 pl. 6). Smaller standing figures of the Four Correlates flank the seated Confucius in the same way that other popular prints portray a gods assistants, visually attesting his importance and power. Although iconic sculptures representing the Four Correlates accompany the statue of Confucius in the Qufu temple, and all are reproduced as line drawings in Shengxian xiangzan, this book presents each figure in isolation. The popular print not only casts the Four Correlates as Confuciuss assistants, it also gives each of the five men a halo, a motif originally introduced from Buddhist visual iconography and more
deeds that were carved in 1592 for display in the Hall of the Sages Traces (Shengji dian ), behind the Qufu temples sacrificial hall (Murray 1996). In 1991, incised copies of the Hangzhou tablets were added, installed in the wall of a courtyard east of the main axis. 38 Po Sung-nien (1992) provides an accessible introduction to the iconography and use of popular prints; James A. Flath (2003) offers a more comprehensive and contextually rigorous discussion.
395
Figure 7. Confucius and Four Correlates, entitled Great Completion Ultimate Sage and First Teacher, Master Kong (Dacheng Zhisheng xianshi Kongzi ), early twentieth century, woodblock print from Yangliuqing , Hebei. 42 34.5 cm. Source: Kongzi baitu (1997, 18:4).
recently reinforced by Christian imagery. The swirl pattern that fills the space above is modeled after the auspicious clouds that often surround Buddhist and Daoist deities. Another popular print depicting Confucius with the Four Correlates frames the group under a temple roof and includes an altar with an incense burner, a setting that visually connotes sacrifice and indicates the ritual function of this
396
Julia K. Murray
Figure 8. Confucius and Four Correlates, entitled Ultimate Sage and Ancestral Teacher (Zhisheng zongshi ), early twentieth century, color woodblock print from Beijing; 3120 cm. Source: Kongzi baitu (1997, 15:1).
image (figure 8).39 These elements, and the carefully printed coloring, suggest that this print was intended for veneration and offerings throughout the year. Confucius
Similarly, interior settings and the paraphernalia of sacrifice sometimes appear in portrait paintings of recently deceased persons that were intended for use in memorial rituals (e.g., Stuart and Rawski 2001, pls. 1.8, 2.6, 2.9, 4.10).
39
397
wears a simplified version of the imperial regalia and has a red face, as other gods sometimes do. The books on the altar refer not to temple rituals but to Confuciuss identification with learning. At the center of the roof ridge is a vase sprouting lances and an inverted V-shaped chime, a common rebus for a lifetime of blessings ( ping sheng ji qing ) (Po 1992, 160). New Year prints typically incorporate such auspicious designs and symbolic decorations as a means of attracting good fortune and worldly success. Taken together, these features suggest that the print was marketed to people who aspired to ascend socially through educational accomplishment and were accustomed to seeking aid from the gods to fulfill their needs. The print visually represents Confucius as an appropriate god to petition for assistance with schooling and examinations. Such expectations are confirmed by the four-character title above his head, Ultimate Sage and Ancestral Teacher (Zhisheng zongshi ). This designation suggests the reverential conception of Confucius as the progenitor of a lineage of scholars,40 and may also allude to his role as the purported founder of a national religion of Confucianism, which Kang Youwei and others were attempting to establish from 1898 through the 1910s (Chen 1999; Goossaert 2006).
AN ALTERNATIVE ICON: THE TRAVELING PEDAGOGUE
Another effect of the Jiajing emperors 1530 removal of icons from state temples and change of Confuciuss honorific title was to give a more prominent role to depictions that represented Confucius as a man rather than as a god. In addition to more numerous and varied versions of his pictorial biography, often called Shengji tu (Murray 2002, 25557), the period after 1530 saw a proliferation of portraits of Confucius as a teacher.41 These images show him wearing a simple cloth cap and undecorated robes, with a sword tucked under his left arm (figure 9). Slightly stooped, he stands in a dignified posture with hands clasped in front of his chest. Some renditions give his face a distinctly homely appearance, even buck teeth, while others replace the simple cloth headgear with a cap shaped like a lotus bud, or even an official cap. In the late Ming and Qing periods, this image was incised on stone tablets for display in school buildings, and it was also reproduced in woodblock-printed books and hanging scroll paintings.42 Differing only slightly from one another, these renditions often include a notation attributing the original
For example, the group of late Ming officials and literati who sponsored the construction of the Hall of the Sages Traces in the Qufu temple referred to themselves as the sixtieth generation of the Sages disciples (Shengmen liushi chuan ) (Murray 1996, 278). 41 I reproduce and discuss several depictions of Confucius as a traveling teacher (Murray 2001) and analyze the origins and evolution of this iconography (Murray, forthcoming); Luo Chenglie (2003) illustrates many examples and provides dimensions for those in Qufu. Some of the images bear large-character titles, such as Xingjiao tu / Xingjiao xiang (Picture/Portrait [of Confucius] Practicing the Teaching), or Xiansheng yixiang / Zhisheng yixiang / Xuansheng yixiang (Legacy Portrait of the First Sage/Ultimate Sage/Propagating Sage). 42 Rubbings from several Ming and Qing incised portrait stelae are reproduced in Beijing tushuguan cang huaxiang taben huibian (1993, vols. 1, 6), Kongzi baitu (1997), and Luo (2003); local
40
398
Julia K. Murray
Figure 9. Portrait of Confucius, rubbing of incised stone tablet, Ming sixteenth-century replacement of Southern Song twelfthcentury tablet erected by Kong Duanyou and Kong Chuan in Quzhou , Zhejiang. Source: Qufu Kongmiao jianzhu (1988), fig. 1-1-2.
399
Figure 10. Confucius and Yan Hui, rubbing of incised stone tablet erected by Kong Yu in the Temple of Confucius, Qufu, Shandong, Northern Song period, dated 1118. Source: E. Chavannes, Mission Archologique dans la Chine Septentrionale (Paris: Leroux, 1909), CCCXCVIII:871.
depiction to Wu Daozi (c. 689after 755), the most renowned figure painter of the eighth century. However, Wus early biographies and lists of paintings do not mention any portrait of Confucius. Although the earliest references date only from the late eleventh century (Murray, forthcoming), Wu could conceivably have been inspired to paint an image of Confucius while serving in office in Xiaqiu, Yanzhou , a short distance from Qufu (Zhang Yanyuan [847] 1963, vol. 1, 9:1089). Confuciuss three-quarter stance and costume in this portrayal closely resemble those of another picture, in which he is accompanied by his favorite disciple, Yan Hui (figure 10).43 First documented in the late eleventh century, the two-man composition reproduced a small painting in the Kong family ancestral temple ( jia miao
gazetteers and epigraphical compendia preserve inscriptions for numerous stones that no longer survive. I discuss some of these and other examples (Murray, forthcoming).
400
Julia K. Murray
was adjacent to but separate from the official temple of Confucius in Qufu. Recorded in successive Kong genealogies (e.g., Kong Chuan [1134] 1967, xia: 3b4a; Kong Yuancuo [1242] 1967, 8:4b), the heirloom painting allegedly transmitted Confuciuss true likeness more faithfully than other portraits, and it was repeatedly copied in stone stelae and woodblock-printed books from the late eleventh century onward (Murray, forthcoming). The solo portrait was probably created by enlarging the figure of Confucius from this two-man composition. In the early Southern Song period (11271279), prominent Kongs from Qufu erected a stele depicting just Confucius in Quzhou , Zhejiang, where they settled after fleeing the Jin invasions of the north in 112627.44 In the following centuries, the solo portrait was repeatedly recarved onto new stones, particularly at government schools and private academies in the South. Several early examples have inscriptions referring to a stone incised with the Wu Daozi image of Confucius that was miraculously found in 1322 inside a bridge near Jiangling , Hubei, and subsequently put on display there (Kongzi baitu 1997, 107; Zhongguo meishu quanji, huihua bian 1988, 19 no. 70). The apparent preference for the solo portrait in the South and its association with the Southern Kongs contrast with the northern affiliations of the two-man composition, which was reproduced on stelae in the Qufu temple and elsewhere under the Jin dynasty (Murray, forthcoming). Competing with the Southern Song for the allegiance of the Kongs and of learned men in general, the Jin patronized the temple and awarded the ducal title to Kong Duanyous younger brother, who had remained behind in Qufu (Wilson 1996, 57172). Although incised tablets depicting Confucius as a simply dressed standing figure were widespread before 1530, this image gained importance after the Jiajing emperor abolished icons from Confucian temples. The representation accorded well with Confuciuss new official designation as Ultimate Sage and First Teacher, and the composition readily circulated in rubbings, from which additional tablets could be carved. Normally displayed in school buildings rather than in sacrificial halls, it played no role in the formal rituals performed twice a year. Instead, the portrayal was commemorative and inspirational, offering latter-day students and teachers visual rapport with their role model and
The painting of Confucius and Yan Hui is first mentioned in a now-lost genealogy published in 1085 by Kong Zonghan (eleventh century), quoted by Kong Chuan ([1134] 1967, xia: 3b-4a); Kong Yuancuo ([1242] 1967, shou) reproduces the composition in a line drawing. Records by writers outside the Kong lineage associate Wu Daozi with the two-man depiction, as well as with the solo portrait (Murray, forthcoming). 44 The Ming recarving of the stele (figure 9) bears an inscription stating that the original was erected by Kong Duanyou (d. 1132) and Kong Chuan (ca. 1059ca. 1134) (Qufu Kongmiao jianzhu 1988, 3 fig. 1-1-2 caption; Luo 2003, 24). Kong Duanyou was the forty-eighth-generations Duke of Perpetuating the Sage; Kong Chuan was a forty-seventh- generation descendant and genealogist who brought precious documents to the South. The Southern Song emperor Gaozong sought the allegiance of refugee Kongs and gave them official positions, courtesy titles, and a base in Quzhou, where they could resume caring for their ancestors spirit.
43
), which
401
allowing them to imagine themselves as the latest generation of Confuciuss disciples. In the Qing period, three stelae carved with versions of the solo portrait of Confucius were added to the Qufu temples Hall of the Sages Traces (Shengji dian ), joining a 112-scene pictorial hagiography displayed on stone tablets there since 159293 (Murray 1996). Modified versions of Confuciuss portrayal as a teacher also appeared in European publications of the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (Dematt 2007, 3738; Jensen 1997, 10, 82). After the Qing dynasty was overthrown and replaced by the Republican government, the basis for the official cult of Confucius became much more tenuous (Wilson 2002b, 8587).45 Although some prominent intellectuals advocated making Confucianism a national religion modeled on Christianity, others worked strenuously to redefine it as a nonreligious cultural tradition (Goossaert 2006, 15). As First Teacher, Confucius became a symbol of respect for learning and an emblem of classical civilization. This conception also found resonance with the Japanese, who increasingly saw themselves as heirs to the ancient cultural legacy (Fogel 1995, chap. 6).46 In 1935, a small Ming bronze image of the standing Confucius was installed in the Yushima Seido , the Confucian temple in Tokyo, which had been rebuilt with sturdy modern materials after the 1923 earthquake (Yushima Seido to Edo jidai 1990, nempo , B1). When Confucius was repudiated by Communist authorities in the Peoples Republic after 1949, the Nationalist government in Taiwan promoted him as an emblem of its commitment to preserve Chinas ancient heritage. In 1974, at the height of the Criticize Lin Biao, Criticize Confucius ( pi Lin pi Kong ) movement on the mainland, the Taiwan government officially sponsored and disseminated a carefully chosen portrayal of Confucius (Cai 1976, 115; Murray 2001, 17, 26). Deeming his identity as a teacher most significant for Chinese and world culture, the Ministry of Education designated a purported Wu Daozi image to serve as the official portrait of Confucius (figure 11). Based on a rubbing from a Qing stele in Qufu, the depiction gave Confucius an appropriately dignified yet humane appearance. Moreover, the choice was validated by Kong Decheng (19202008), the senior Kong in the seventyseventh generation, who had lived in Qufu before fleeing to Taiwan in 1949. Over-life-size bronze statues using this iconography were cast in Taiwan and presented in 197475 to sites of culture and learning around the world, including the Yushima Seido (figure 12).
Official sacrifices briefly stopped with the fall of the Qing but were revived by President Yuan Shikai (18591916) in 1914, although their observance declined after his failed attempt to found a new dynasty. In 1935, the Nationalist government withdrew the ducal title from Confuciuss descendants (Jing 1996, 39). 46 This attitude also encouraged the Japanese to mount extensive photographic, archaeological, and epigraphical surveys of Chinas ancient monuments and sites, including detailed investigations of Qufu in the first several decades of the twentieth century, as well as stimulating Sinological studies and compilations of Chinese texts.
45
402
Julia K. Murray
Figure 11. Portrait of Confucius, traditionally attributed to Tang master Wu Daozi (ca. 689after 755), rubbing of a Qing-period incised stone tablet in the Temple of Confucius, Qufu, Shandong. Source: Baba (1940, 40).
More recently, mainland China has turned away from iconoclasm, and representations of Confucius are proliferating once more. The smashed icons in the Qufu temple were reconstructed in 1984, and Hong Kong and overseas Chinese donors have erected large statues of the ancient teacher at many schools and at former Confucian temples that have been restored as tourist attractions (see cover photo in this issue). In 1999, the government-supported China Confucius Foundation issued a limited edition of 1,000 gold statuettes of Confucius to honor the 2,500th anniversary of his birth (figure 13). Promotional literature claimed that the statue was based on the most faithful traditional portrait, the Wu Daozi image, but was even more authentic. Instead of imitating the anachronistic clothing inadvertently depicted by Wu, the robes of the new image reflected archaeological evidence from the Warring States period. This concern for period-appropriate costume perfectly captures the
403
Figure 12. Statue of Confucius on the grounds of the Yushima Seido (Temple of Confucius), Tokyo, 1975, bronze, cast in Taibei, height 4.58 m.
modern demand for a scientific recovery of the past; nonetheless, the removal of Confuciuss sword suggests that modern beliefs also influenced the depiction teacher-philosophers no longer carry weapons. Since 2004, China has used Confucius to promote the study of Chinese language and culture worldwide under the rubric of Confucius Institutes and has even contributed funds to establish a Confucius Literacy Prize awarded by UNESCO (China View 2006). In order to make Confucius a more recognizable and effective symbol of Chinese civilization, the China Confucius Foundation pushed to standardize his visual representation and put an end to the diverse portrayals, some of which purportedly even deified and defamed (shenhua he chouhua ) him (Zhongguo xinwen wang 2006). Thus, in January 2006, plans were announced to create a standard portrait, starting with yet another review of existing images in consultation with scholars of Confucianism, historians, sculptors and painters, and descendants of Confucius.
404
Julia K. Murray
Figure 13. Statuette of Confucius, 1999, designed for the China Confucius Foundation by Qian Shaowu (b. 1928), 24-carat gold, height 27 cm. Source: China Confucius Foundation publicity pamphlet, 2001.
Design specifications issued in February called for the new portrait to be based on the purported Wu Daozi image and to depict Confucius as between sixty and seventy years of age, with a facial expression that was at once genial yet strict, imposing and yet not intimidating, courteous and yet at ease (wen er li, wei er bu meng, gong er an ) (Dahe xinxiang wang 2006, quoting Analects 7.38, trans. Dawson 1993, 27). A prototype was presented at the Shandong International Cultural Industry Exposition in June 2006, and the final version was unveiled in Qufu on September 23, in time for birthday celebrations (China View 2006) (figure 14). Inevitably, this effort to standardize the portrayal of Confucius prompted criticisms (CRIEnglish.com 2006), some of which recall the kinds of objections raised against his icons in earlier periods. Obviously, it is impossible to know what Confucius really looked like so long after his lifetime, and even the so-called Wu Daozi portrait came from the artists
405
Figure 14. Standard Portrait of Confucius, 2006, designed for the China Confucius Foundation by Hu Xijia (b. 1956), bronze, height 255.7 cm. Qufu. Photo by Julia K. Murray.
imagination. Moreover, an emphasis on Confuciuss outward appearance seems wrong and completely unnecessary to people who focus on his teachings and the values associated with him. The variety of visual representations reflects the ways in which Confucius has been understood and appropriated throughout history. As scholars debated in 2006 whether it was possible or desirable to decree any portrayal as correct, one new argument captured a contemporary concern: that creating a standard is the first step toward patenting the image for commercial profit (China Daily 2006). In response, Secretary-General Zhang Shuhua of the China Confucius Foundation reiterated that a unified standard was intended only to end the confusion caused by multiple images and to facilitate worldwide recognition of Confucius; in fact, it did not really matter whether the portrait resembled Confucius (CRIEnglish.com 2006). However, Zhang also mentioned that Taiwan had previously issued its own standard
406
Julia K. Murray
image of Confucius, implying that the real confusion has to do with which regime controls his legacy. Thus, the 2006 branding of Confucius was not primarily for commercial motives but for political ones. Establishing an official portrait of Confucius is an assertion of authority over the heritage of Chinese civilization.
Acknowledgments Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the College Art Association; at the University of Wisconsins Center for East Asian Studies seminar series; and in the 2007 Confucius Seminar Mellon Workshop in the Center for Humanities. I thank the participants in these sessions for their insightful questions and comments. I am also grateful to Thomas Wilson, Mark Csikszentmihalyi, and the two anonymous JAS reviewers for their detailed suggestions on the submitted manuscript.
List of References ABE, STANLEY K. 2002. Ordinary Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BABA HARUKICHI . 1940. Ko Mo Seiseki zukan [Reflection in pictures of the traces of the sages Confucius and Mencius]. Tokyo: Santo bunka kenkyu kai. BARNHART, RICHARD M., et al. 1997. Three Thousand Years of Chinese Painting. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press; Beijing: Foreign Languages Press. Beijing tushuguan cang huaxiang taben huibian [Pictorial rubbings in the Beijing Library]. 1993. Vols. 1, 6. Beijing: Shumu wenxian chubanshe. BI ZIYAN . 1983. Shiyin yuan cang gao [Drafts stored in the Stone Hidden Garden]. Repr. Yingyin Wenyuan ge Siku quanshu, di 1293 ce , 1293 . Taipei: Taiwan shang wu yin shu guan. CAI WENYI . 1976. Kongzi shengxiang tantao [Deliberations on the portrait of the sage Confucius]. Guoli lishi bowuguan guankan 8:11418. CHAN, WING-TSIT. 1989. Chu Hsi and the Academies. In Neo-Confucian Education: The Formative Stage, ed. William T. de Bary and John W. Chaffee, 389413. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. CHEN, HSI-YUAN. 1999. Confucianism Encounters Religion: The Formation of Religious Discourse and the Confucian Movement in Modern China. PhD diss., Harvard University. China Daily. 2006. Statue of Confucius Sparks Trademark Dispute in China. September 25. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2006-09/25/content_696234.htm [accessed January 27, 2009]. China View. 2006. China Unveils Standard Portrait of Confucius. September 23. http:// news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-09/23/content_5128745.htm [accessed January 14, 2009].
407
CHU, RON GUEY. 1998. Rites and Rights in Ming China. In Confucianism and Human Rights, ed. William T. de Bary and Tu Weiming, 16978. New York: Columbia University Press. CLART, PHILIP. 2003. Confucius and the Mediums: Is There a Popular Confucianism? Toung Pao, ser. 2, 89 (13): 138. CRIENGLISH.COM. 2006. Official Image of Confucius Sparks Debate among Scholars. September 26. http://english.cri.cn/3126/2006/09/26/264@143753.htm [accessed January 27, 2009]. CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, MARK. 2001. Confucius. In The Rivers of Paradise: Moses, Buddha, Confucius, Jesus, and Muhammad as Religious Founders, ed. David Noel Freedman and Michael J. McClymond, 233308. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdsman. . 2002. Confucius and the Analects in the Han. In Confucius and the Analects, ed. Brian van Norden, 13462. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Da zai Kongzi [Great is Confucius]. 1991. Ed. Zhang Zuoyao . Hong Kong: Heping tushu youxian gongsi. Dahe xinxiang wang . 2006. Banben guo duo, Kongzi daodi zhang shayang, Kongzi biaozhun xiang liuyue quanqiu fabu , , 6 [With too many versions, how in fact did the aged Confucius appear: A standard portrait of Confucius to be announced worldwide in June]. February 17. http://ww.373w.com/category/60300/2006/02/17/2006-02-17_12210_60300.shtml [accessed January 31, 2009]. DAWSON, RAYMOND, trans. 1993. Confucius: The Analects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DEMATT, PAOLA. 2007. Christ and Confucius: Accommodating Christian and Chinese Beliefs. In China on Paper: European and Chinese Works from the Late Sixteenth to the Early Nineteenth Century, ed. Marcia Reed and Paola Dematt, 2951. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute. DOR, HENRI, S. J. 191138. Recherches sur les Superstitions en Chine. 18 vols. Shanghai: Imprimerie de la Mission catholique. Trans. M. Kennelly et al., Researches into Chinese Superstitions, 13 vols., 191438. Shanghai: Tusewei Press; repr., Taipei: Cheng-wen Pub. Co., 196667. EBREY, PATRICIA B. 1989. Education through Ritual: Efforts to Formulate Family Rituals During the Sung Period. In Neo-Confucian Education: The Formative Stage, ed. William T. de Bary and John W. Chaffee, 277306. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. . 1991. Confucianism and Family Rituals in Imperial China: A Social History of Writing about Rites. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ELMAN, BENJAMIN A. 1990. Classicism, Politics, and Kinship: The Chang-chou School of New Text Confucianism in Late Imperial China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. FAN YE . 1965. Hou Han shu [History of the Latter Han]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. FARMER, J. MICHAEL. 2000. Art, Education, and Power: Illustrations in the Stone Chamber of Wen Weng. Toung Pao 86:100135. FLATH, JAMES A. 2003. The Cult of Happiness: Nianhua, Art, and History in Rural North China. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. FOGEL, JOSHUA A. 1995. The Cultural Dimension of Sino-Japanese Relations: Essays on the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe. FOULK, T. GRIFFITH, and ROBERT H. SHARF 199394. On the Ritual Use of Chan Portraiture in Medieval China. Cahiers dExtrme-Asie 7:149219.
408
Julia K. Murray
GOOSSAERT, VINCENT. 2005. The Concept of Religion in China and the West. Trans. Jean Burrell. Diogenes 52 (1): 1320. . 2006. 1898: The Beginning of the End for Chinese Religion? Journal of Asian Studies 65 (2): 30736. GU YINGTAI . [1658] 1963. Mingshi jishi benmo [Record of the events of Ming history from beginning to end]. Taipei: Sanmin shuju. HANSEN, VALERIE. 1990. Changing Gods in Medieval China, 11271276. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. HUANG CHIN-HSING . 1994. Youru shengyu [Entering the Sages realm]. Taipei: Yunchen wenhua shiye gufen youxian gongsi. . 2002. The Cultural Politics of Autocracy: The Confucius Temple and Ming Despotism, 13681530. In On Sacred Grounds: Culture, Society, Politics, and the Formation of the Temple of Confucius, ed. Thomas A. Wilson, 26796. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center. HUANG YONGQUAN . 1963. Li Gonglin Sheng xian tu shike [Stone carvings of Li Gonglins Pictures of the Sage and Worthies]. Beijing: Renmin meishu chubanshe. JENSEN, LIONEL M. 1997. Manufacturing Confucianism: Chinese Traditions and Universal Civilization. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. . 2002. The Genesis of Confucius in Ancient Narrative. In On Sacred Grounds: Culture, Society, Politics, and the Formation of the Temple of Confucius, ed. Thomas A. Wilson, 175221. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center. JING, JUN. 1996. The Temple of Memories: History, Power, and Morality in a Chinese Village. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. KIESCHNICK, JOHN. 2003. The Impact of Buddhism on Chinese Material Culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. KONG CHUAN . [1134] 1967. Dongjia zaji [Miscellaneous records of the Eastern House]. In Linlang bishi congshu ; repr. Baibu congshu jicheng , ser. 65. Taibei: Yiwen yinshu guan. KONG DEMAO . 1982. Kongfu neizhai yishi: Kongzi houyi di huiyi : [Anecdotes from the inner household of the Kong establishment: Reminiscences of a descendant of Confucius]. Tianjin: Renmin chubanshe. KONG JIFEN . [1762] 1966. Queli wenxian kao [Research on documents in Queli]. Taibei: Zhongguo wenxian chubanshe. KONG YUANCUO . [1242] 1967. Kongshi zuting guangji [An expanded record of the Kong lineage]. In Linlang bishi congshu ; repr. Baibu congshu jicheng , ser. 65. Taibei: Yiwen yinshu guan. KONG YUQI . [1689] 1983. Xing Lu shengdian [Documents from the Kangxi emperors visit to Qufu]. Repr. Yingyin Wenyuan ge Siku quanshu, di 652 ce , 652 . Taipei: Taiwan shangwu yinshu guan. KONG ZHAOXI . [1897] 1990. Zengbu Kongting zhaiyao [Essentials concerning the Kong family, expanded]. Repr., Kongzi wenhua daquan, shizhi lei , . Jinan: Shandong youyi shushe. Kongzi baitu [One hundred pictures of Confucius]. 1997. Comp. Wang Shucun . Guangzhou: Lingnan meishu chubanshe. LI DAOYUAN . 1984. Shuijing zhu jiao [Collated annotations to the Rivers Classic]. Coll. Wang Guowei . Shanghai: Renimin chubanshe. LI YANSHOU . 1974. Bei shi [History of the northern dynasties]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. . 1975. Nan shi [History of the southern dynasties]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
409
L WEIQI . 1632. Shengxian xiangzan [Portraits and encomia for the sage and worthies]. n.p. 1832; n.p., Sanxi tang . Qufu: Huiwen tang , 1878. LUO CHENGLIE . 2003. Huaxiang zhong de Kongzi [The figures of Confucius (sic)]. Shanghai: Guji chubanshe. MAKEHAM, JOHN. 1996. The Formation of the Lunyu as a Book. Monumenta Serica 44:124. . 2003. The Retrospective Creation of New Confucianism. In New Confucianism: A Critical Examination, ed. John Makeham, 2554. New York: Palgrave Macmillan MESKILL, JOHN. 1982. Academies in Ming China: A Historical Essay. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. MUNGELLO, DAVID E. 2003. A Confucian Voice Crying in the Victorian Wilderness. Journal of Religion 83 (4): 58592. MURRAY, JULIA K. 1992. The Hangzhou Portraits of Confucius and 72 Disciples (Shengxian tu): Art in the Service of Politics. Art Bulletin 74:718. . 1996. The Temple of Confucius and Pictorial Biographies of the Sage. Journal of Asian Studies 55 (2): 269300. . 2001. Portraits of Confucius: Icons and Iconoclasm. Oriental Art 47 (3):1728. . 2002. Varied Views of the Sage: Illustrated Narratives of the Life of Confucius. In On Sacred Grounds: Culture, Society, Politics, and the Formation of the Temple of Confucius, ed. Thomas A. Wilson, 22264. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center. . Forthcoming. Pedagogue on the Go: Portraits of Confucius as an Itinerant Teacher. In Bridges to Heaven: Essays in Honor of Professor Wen C. Fong, ed. Judith Smith and Dora C. Y. Ching. Princeton, N.J.: Tang Center for East Asian Art. NESKAR, ELLEN. 1996. Shrines to Local Former Worthies. In Religions of China in Practice, ed. Donald S. Lopez Jr., 293305. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press NIKEL, LUKAS, ed. 2002. Return of the Buddha: The Qingzhou Discoveries. London: Royal Academy of Arts. OUYANG XIU . 1975. Xin Tang shu [New history of the Tang]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. PO SUNG-NIEN 1992. Domesticated Deities and Auspicious Emblems. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Queli zhi [Gazetteer of Queli]. 1505. Chen Gao [Hao] , comp., Qufu. 1599/ 1609 ed.; Kong Zhencong , comp., Qufu. Mid-seventeenth-century ed.; Kong Yinzhi , comp., Qufu. Qufu Kongmiao jianzhu [The architecture of the Confucius Temple in Qufu]. 1987. Comp. Nanjing Gongxueyuan jianzhuxi and Qufu wenwu guanli weiyuanhui . Beijing: Zhongguo jianzhu gongye chubanshe. Qufu xianzhi [Gazetteer of Qufu county]. [1774] 1968. Comp. Pan Xiang et al. Repr., Xinxiu fangzhi congkan . 85. Taibei: Xuesheng shuju. RUDOVA, MARIA. 1988. Chinese Popular Prints. Trans. Viacheslav Sobolev. Leningrad: Aurora Art Publishers. SHARF, ROBERT H. 1996. The Scripture on the Production of Buddha Images. In Religions of China in Practice, ed. Donald S. Lopez Jr., 26167. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. SHEN, HSUEH-MAN. 2000. Buddhist Relic Deposits from Tang (618907) to Northern Song (9601127) and Liao (9071125). PhD diss., St Hughs College, University of Oxford.
410
Julia K. Murray
SIMA QIAN . 1982. Shi ji [Records of the historian]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. SOMMER, DEBORAH A. 1993. Chiu Chns On the Conduct of Sacrificial Offerings. PhD diss., Columbia University. . 1994. Images into Words: Ming Confucian Iconoclasm. National Palace Museum Bulletin 29:124. . 2002. Destroying Confucius: Iconoclasm in the Confucian Temple. In On Sacred Grounds: Culture, Society, Politics, and the Formation of the Temple of Confucius, ed. Thomas A Wilson, 95133. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center STANDAERT, NICOLAS. 2006. Ritual Dances and Their Visual Representations in the Ming and the Qing. East Asian Library Journal 12 (1): 68181. STUART, JAN, and EVELYN S. RAWSKI. 2001. Worshiping the Ancestors: Chinese Commemorative Portraits. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution; Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. TAYLOR, ROMEYN. 1990. Official and Popular Religion and the Political Organization of Chinese Society in the Ming. In Orthodoxy in Late Imperial China. ed. Kwang-Ching Liu, 12657. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. . 1997. Official Altars, Temples and Shrines Mandated for All Counties in Ming and Qing. Toung Pao 83:93125. WANG JIA . 1966. Shiyi ji [Recorded gleanings]. Repr., Baibu congshu jicheng , ser. 9. Taibei: Xinxing shuju. WANG LIANG. 2002. The Confucian Temple Tragedy of the Cultural Revolution. Trans. Curtis Dean Smith. In On Sacred Grounds: Culture, Society, Politics, and the Formation of the Temple of Confucius, ed. Thomas A Wilson, 37698. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center. WANG SHUCUN. 1992. Paper Joss: Deity Worship through Folk Prints. Beijing: New World Press. WECHSLER, HOWARD J. 1985. Offerings of Silk and Jade. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. WILSON, THOMAS A. 1995. Genealogy of the Way: The Construction and Uses of the Confucian Tradition in Late Imperial China. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. . 1996. The Ritual Formation of Confucian Orthodoxy and the Descendants of the Sage. Journal of Asian Studies 55 (3): 55984. . 2002a. Culture, Society, Politics, and the Cult of Confucius. In On Sacred Grounds: Culture, Society, Politics, and the Formation of the Temple of Confucius, ed. Thomas A. Wilson, 140. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center. . 2002b. Ritualizing Confucius [Kongzi]: The Family and State Cults of the Sage of Culture in Imperial China. In On Sacred Grounds: Culture, Society, Politics, and the Formation of the Temple of Confucius, ed. Thomas A. Wilson, 4395. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center. . 2002c. Sacrifice and the Imperial Cult of Confucius. History of Religions 41: 25187. Xichao xinyu [New sayings from the brilliant (Qing) court]. [1824] 1984. Comp. Xu Xilin and Qian Yong . Repr., Jindai Zhongguo shiliao congkan, sanbian, di si ji , , . Taibei: Wenhai chubanshe. YANG, LIU. 2001. Images for the Temple: Imperial Patronage in the Development of Tang Daoist Art. Artibus Asiae 61 (2): 189261. YANG XUANZHI . 1978. Luoyang qielan ji jiaozhu . Ed. Fan Xiangyong . Shanghai: Guji chubanshe.
411
YAZI [Wang Liang]. 1991. Kongfu da jienan [The great plundering of the Kong establishment]. Hong Kong: Tiandi tushu youxian gongsi. YU, DAVID C. 1973. Chinese Folk Religion. History of Religions 12 (4): 37887. Yushima Seido to Edo jidai [The Yushima Confucius Temple and the Edo period]. 1990. Ed. Nishiyama Matsunosuke . Tokyo: Shibundo . ZEITLIN, JUDITH T. 2005. The Life and Death of the Image: Ghosts and Female Portraits in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Literature. In Body and Face in Chinese Visual Culture, ed. Wu Hung and Katherine R. Tsiang, 22956. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center. ZHANG TINGYU et al. [1739] 1974. Ming shi [History of the Ming]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. ZHANG YANYUAN . [847] 1963. Lidai minghua ji [Record of famous paintings through the ages]. Repr. Huashi congshu . Ed. Yu Anlan . Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin meishu chubanshe. Zhongguo meishu quanji, huihua bian , [Complete collection of Chinese art, painting section], vol. 19. 1988. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin meishu chubanshe. Zhongguo xinwen wang . 2006. Zhongxuanbu pizhun Kongzi jijinhui zhengji Kongzi biaozhun xiang [The Central Propaganda Bureau authorizes the Confucius Foundation to collect portraits for a standard portrait of Confucius]. January 26. http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2006-01-26/ 14408977148.shtml [accessed January 31, 2009].

"Idols" in The Temple. Icons and The Cult of Confucius. Julia K. Murray PDF

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

"Idols" in The Temple. Icons and The Cult of Confucius. Julia K. Murray PDF

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

The Journal of Asian Studies

http://journals.cambridge.org/JAS Additional services for The

Journal of Asian Studies:

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/JAS, IP address: 88.10.178.99 on 28 Feb 2014

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

THE EARLIEST ICONS

CONFUCIUS AND THEIR VISUAL FEATURES

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

CONVERGENCE WITH OTHER CULT IMAGES

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

QUFU TEMPLE ICON

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Idols in the Temple: Icons and the Cult of Confucius

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen