Sie sind auf Seite 1von 48

Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary

Program Type Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP)

Setting Small City

Assessment Name Copy of Hale Road Elementary School - Final

Assessment Date 2008-03-18

Cost Set: 2007

Building Name Hale Road Elementary

Building IRN 14845

Building Address 56 Hale Rd

Building City Painesville

Building Zipcode 44077

Building Phone (440) 352-2300

Acreage 32

Current Grades K-5

Teaching Stations 28

Number of Floors 3

Student Capacity 419

Current Enrollment 1

Enrollment Date 2007-08-23

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms 26

Historical Register NO

Building’s Principal Mr. Jack Miley

Building Type Elementary

Next Page

Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary Page 1 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - Hale Road Elementary(14845)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

52,375 Total Existing Square Footage


1925,1949,1965 Building Dates
K-5 Grades
1 Current Enrollment
28 Teaching Stations
32 Site Acreage

Hale Road Elementary School is a three (3) story structure totaling 52,375 s.f. The complex is constructed on a sloping site providing a multi-height split level floor arrangement.
The original facility of 22,156 s.f. was constructed in 1925. The first classroom wing addition of 19,180 s.f. was constructed in 1949. The second classroom wing addition of 10,409
s.f. was constructed in 1965. The facility contains one (1) gymnasium of 3,902 s.f., which also serves as student dining, one (1) kitchen of 662 s.f. and one (1) media center of
1014 s.f. Hale Road Elementary currently provides space for grades K-5. The majority of the complex is not accessible and does not conform to the provisions of the Americans
with Disabilities Act Guidelines. Typical classrooms throughout the complex are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio. The
school facility is located on a 32 acre site in a residential area. School buses load/unload along a separated drive at the main entry to the school. The existing structure is
constructed with load bearing masonry walls with supported deck and slab on grade construction. The structure is outfitted with a motion sensor security system and a fire alarm
system with manual pull stations. The complex does not contain a suppression system and the majority of the complex is not air conditioned.

Previous Page

Next Page

Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - Hale Road Elementary(14845) Page 2 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Name Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet


Original Building 1925 no 3 22,156
Classroom Wing Addition 1949 no 3 19,810
Classroom Wing Addition 1965 no 2 10,409

Previous Page

Next Page

Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) Page 3 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Auditorium Agricultural
Primary Media Vocational Student Indoor Adult Board Outside Auxiliary
Addition Fixed Corridors Education Kitchen Natatorium
Gymnasium Center Space Dining Tracks Education Offices Agencies Gymnasium
Seating Lab
Original Building
2724 3902 1014 662
(1925)
Classroom Wing
2926
Addition (1949)
Classroom Wing
1817
Addition (1965)
Master Planning Considerations

Previous Page

Next Page

Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) Page 4 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Existing CT Programs for Assessment
Next Page

Previous Page

Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet


No Records Found

Legend:

Not in current design manual

In current design manual but missing from assessment

<Untitled> Page 5 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Building Summary - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

District: Riverside Local Local SD County: Lake Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Name: Hale Road Elementary Contact: Mr. Jack Miley
Address: 56 Hale Rd Phone: (440) 352-2300
Painesville,OH 44077 Date Prepared: 2008-03-18 By: Tony Schorr
Bldg. IRN: 14845 Date Revised: 2008-08-26 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 32 CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 28
Current Enrollment 1 Classrooms: 26 Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Projected Enrollment N/A Cover Sheet ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
Addition Date HA Number of Current Square 1.0 The School Site 200 176 88% Satisfactory
Floors Feet 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 400 248 62% Borderline
Original Building 1925 no 3 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability 200 140 70% Satisfactory
Classroom Wing 1949 no 3 19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security 400 294 74% Satisfactory
Addition 5.0 Educational Adequacy 400 246 62% Borderline
Classroom Wing 1965 no 2 10,409 6.0 Environment for Education 400 236 59% Borderline
Addition
Commentary ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
Total 52,375
Total 2000 1340 67% Borderline
*HA = Handicapped Access
C=Under Contract
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
Renovation Cost Factor 104.16%
=3 Needs Replacement
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $8,088,060.81
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
FACILITY ASSESSMENT Dollar requested from a Master Plan.
Cost Set: 2007 Rating Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $1,518,875.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $146,937.00 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 2 $80,000.00 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $486,625.00 -
F. Windows 3 $214,500.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 2 $46,100.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $209,872.50 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $871,779.50 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $261,875.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $130,937.50 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $52,375.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $78,562.50 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $631,837.50 -
P. Site Condition 3 $319,943.00 -
Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $5,000.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $16,000.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $75,000.00 -
U. Life Safety 3 $330,218.75 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $209,500.00 -
W. Technology 3 $559,365.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency / - $1,519,732.09 -
Non-Construction Cost
Total $7,765,035.34

Previous Page

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) Page 6 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Original Building (1925) Summary

District: Riverside Local Local SD County: Lake Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Name: Hale Road Elementary Contact: Mr. Jack Miley
Address: 56 Hale Rd Phone: (440) 352-2300
Painesville,OH 44077 Date Prepared: 2008-03-18 By: Tony Schorr
Bldg. IRN: 14845 Date Revised: 2008-08-26 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 32 CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 28
Current Enrollment 1 Classrooms: 26 Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Projected Enrollment N/A Cover Sheet ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
Addition Date HA Number of Current Square 1.0 The School Site 200 176 88% Satisfactory
Floors Feet 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 400 248 62% Borderline
Original Building 1925 no 3 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability 200 140 70% Satisfactory
Classroom Wing 1949 no 3 19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security 400 294 74% Satisfactory
Addition 5.0 Educational Adequacy 400 246 62% Borderline
Classroom Wing 1965 no 2 10,409 6.0 Environment for Education 400 236 59% Borderline
Addition
Commentary ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
Total 52,375
Total 2000 1340 67% Borderline
*HA = Handicapped Access
C=Under Contract
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
Renovation Cost Factor 104.16%
=3 Needs Replacement
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $3,703,868.60
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
FACILITY ASSESSMENT Dollar requested from a Master Plan.
Cost Set: 2007 Rating Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $642,524.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $67,592.00 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 2 $80,000.00 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $191,692.00 -
F. Windows 3 $82,500.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 2 $22,100.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $99,522.50 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $419,604.00 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $110,780.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $55,390.00 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $22,156.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $33,234.00 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $288,815.60 -
P. Site Condition 3 $168,824.00 -
Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $5,000.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $8,000.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $75,000.00 -
U. Life Safety 3 $162,007.00 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $88,624.00 -
W. Technology 3 $236,626.08 -
- X. Construction Contingency / - $695,950.25 -
Non-Construction Cost
Total $3,555,941.43

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) Page 7 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) Summary

District: Riverside Local Local SD County: Lake Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Name: Hale Road Elementary Contact: Mr. Jack Miley
Address: 56 Hale Rd Phone: (440) 352-2300
Painesville,OH 44077 Date Prepared: 2008-03-18 By: Tony Schorr
Bldg. IRN: 14845 Date Revised: 2008-08-26 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 32 CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 28
Current Enrollment 1 Classrooms: 26 Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Projected Enrollment N/A Cover Sheet ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
Addition Date HA Number of Current Square 1.0 The School Site 200 176 88% Satisfactory
Floors Feet 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 400 248 62% Borderline
Original Building 1925 no 3 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability 200 140 70% Satisfactory
Classroom Wing 1949 no 3 19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security 400 294 74% Satisfactory
Addition 5.0 Educational Adequacy 400 246 62% Borderline
Classroom Wing Addition 1965 no 2 10,409 6.0 Environment for Education 400 236 59% Borderline
Total 52,375 Commentary ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
*HA = Handicapped Access Total 2000 1340 67% Borderline
*Rating =1 Satisfactory C=Under Contract
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement Renovation Cost Factor 104.16%
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $2,719,993.89
FACILITY ASSESSMENT Dollar The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
Cost Set: 2007 Rating Assessment C requested from a Master Plan.
A. Heating System 3 $574,490.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $42,910.00 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 2 $0.00 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $185,470.00 -
F. Windows 3 $73,480.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 2 $24,000.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $75,390.00 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $295,245.00 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $99,050.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $49,525.00 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $19,810.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $29,715.00 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $126,981.00 -
P. Site Condition 3 $99,020.00 -
Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $0.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $0.00 -
U. Life Safety 3 $114,382.50 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $79,240.00 -
W. Technology 3 $211,570.80 -
- X. Construction Contingency / - $511,081.96 -
Non-Construction Cost
Total $2,611,361.26

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) Page 8 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) Summary

District: Riverside Local Local SD County: Lake Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Name: Hale Road Elementary Contact: Mr. Jack Miley
Address: 56 Hale Rd Phone: (440) 352-2300
Painesville,OH 44077 Date Prepared: 2008-03-18 By: Tony Schorr
Bldg. IRN: 14845 Date Revised: 2008-08-26 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 32 CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 28
Current Enrollment 1 Classrooms: 26 Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Projected Enrollment N/A Cover Sheet ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
Addition Date HA Number of Current Square 1.0 The School Site 200 176 88% Satisfactory
Floors Feet 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 400 248 62% Borderline
Original Building 1925 no 3 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability 200 140 70% Satisfactory
Classroom Wing Addition 1949 no 3 19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security 400 294 74% Satisfactory
Classroom Wing 1965 no 2 10,409 5.0 Educational Adequacy 400 246 62% Borderline
Addition 6.0 Environment for Education 400 236 59% Borderline
Total 52,375 Commentary ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
*HA = Handicapped Access Total 2000 1340 67% Borderline
*Rating =1 Satisfactory C=Under Contract
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement Renovation Cost Factor 104.16%
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $1,664,198.32
FACILITY ASSESSMENT Dollar The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
Cost Set: 2007 Rating Assessment C requested from a Master Plan.
A. Heating System 3 $301,861.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $36,435.00 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 2 $0.00 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $109,463.00 -
F. Windows 3 $58,520.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 2 $0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $34,960.00 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $156,930.50 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $52,045.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $26,022.50 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $10,409.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $15,613.50 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $216,040.90 -
P. Site Condition 3 $52,099.00 -
Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $8,000.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $0.00 -
U. Life Safety 3 $53,829.25 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $41,636.00 -
W. Technology 3 $111,168.12 -
- X. Construction Contingency / - $312,699.87 -
Non-Construction Cost
Total $1,597,732.64

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) Page 9 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Facility Assessment

A. Heating System
Description: The existing system for the entire complex is a gas-fired steam boiler system. The boilers were updated in 1998. Typical classrooms are
equipped with unit ventilators. Radiators remain in service in a few areas. The majority of the complex is not equipped with air conditioning.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of the entire heating, ventilation and cooling system throughout the entire complex due to condition, use of
dated equipment, and lack of proper ventilation and air conditioning. Convert to fully ducted system to conform to OSDM standards and current
ventilation requirements.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Classroom Wing Classroom Wing Sum Comments
Building Building (1925) Addition (1949) Addition (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
HVAC System $22.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $1,152,250.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of
Replacement: piping layout and new controls, air conditioning)
Convert To Ducted $7.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $366,625.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffits,
System Replacement etc. Must be used in addition to HVAC System Replacement
if the existing HVAC system is non-ducted)
Sum: $1,518,875.00 $642,524.00 $574,490.00 $301,861.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 10 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

B. Roofing
Description: The existing roof system for the entire complex is a modified bituminous roof system installed in sections in 1977 and 1993 and now exceeds 15
years of age.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of the existing roof systems due to condition and dated system installations. Provide an OSDM compliant
membrane system at all areas.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments
Building (1925) (1949) (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Membrane (all $7.00sq.ft. 9,656 Required 6,130 Required 5,205 Required $146,937.00(unless under 10,000
types): (Qty) sq.ft.)
Sum: $146,937.00 $67,592.00 $42,910.00 $36,435.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 11 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning


Description: The majority of the complex is not equipped with an air conditioning system. Air conditioning is provided in isolated areas only. Window units are
provided in a few areas.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system throughout the entire complex to conform to OSDM standards. Provisions identified in Plate A.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)SumComments
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 12 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems
Description: The electrical system for the entire complex is a 208/120 volt, 3-phase, 800 amp service. The main electrical service and the distribution system
were replaced in 2001. District officials noted the system was satisfactory.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide for expansion of the existing electrical system to provide a minimum 3-phase 208v Amperage service capacity of 2,400 amps to conform
to OSDM requirements.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Classroom Wing Classroom Wing Sum Comments
Building Building (1925) Addition (1949) Addition (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Other: Electrical $80,000.00allowance Required $80,000.00Provide for expansion of the existing electrical system to
Service increase provide a minimum 3-phase 208v Amperage service
capacity of 2,400 amps.
Sum: $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 13 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures


Description: The school facility contains 8 group restrooms (4 girls, 4 boys) and 2 single occupancy toilet rooms. Fixtures are a combination of newer and
older equipment. Water closets/toilets are typically floor mounted. The majority of the toilet facilities are not accessible and do not conform to the
provisions of the ADA. A portion of urinals are equipped with a continual flush system. Domestic supply piping is copper. District officials noted
that system leaks for both supply and drainage systems have been an ongoing issue of concern.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for replacement of all wall and floor mounted fixtures due to age, condition and/or OSDM requirements. Replace domestic supply and
drainage systems throughout the complex.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)Sum Comments
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Back Flow Preventer: $5,000.00unit 1 Required $5,000.00
Domestic Supply Piping: $3.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $183,312.50(remove / replace)
Sanitary Waste Piping: $3.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $183,312.50(remove / replace)
Toilet: $3,800.00unit 5 Required 8 Required 6 Required $72,200.00(new)
Urinal: $3,800.00unit 2 Required 3 Required 1 Required $22,800.00(new)
Sink: $2,500.00unit 2 Required 2 Required 4 Required $20,000.00(new)
Sum: $486,625.00 $191,692.00 $185,470.00 $109,463.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 14 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

F. Windows
Description: The window assemblies throughout the complex were updated with thermally efficient window assemblies with double paine glazing. District
officials noted the existing installations were installed in approximately 1993 +/- and now exceed 15 years of age. Insert panels reduced daylight
quantities. The assemblies are operable and can not be equipped with integral blinds. A portion of structure is equipped with dated glass block
assemblies.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of all window and glass block assemblies to conform to OSDM standards and include integral blinds.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)Sum Comments
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Insulated Glass/Panels:$55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 1,500 Required 1,336 Required 1,064 Required $214,500.00(includes blinds)
Sum: $214,500.00 $82,500.00 $73,480.00 $58,520.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 15 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation
Description: The existing complex contains a masonry/concrete foundation. There were a few areas of deterioration. An exterior stair assembly, retaining wall
and adjoining foundation structure display evidence of deterioration at the 1925 buildling. A portion of the 1949 building has several prominate
cracks in the walls of the structure with an area of displaced masonry. The apparent damage extends through several floor levels. The damage
may be the result of settlement or additional building movement. District officials noted the conditioning has been progressing over several years
and is increasing in severity. The exterior grade adjacent to the wall structure was covered with stock piled snow from plowed pavement areas
thus hendering assessment of the grade condition at the areas of damage. The grade appeared to slope slightly toward the wall structure. The
ground floor (basement) wall structures displayed evidence of water infiltration in several areas.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide a waterproof membrane system at the exterior wall structures of the habital and classroom areas of the ground floor to prevent below
grade water infiltration at the perimeter of the structure. Replace the deteriorated stair and retaining wall assembly and repair adjoining foundation
structures. Refer to Plate ’’H’’ for additional provisions.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Classroom Wing Sum Comments
Building (1925) Addition (1949) Addition (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Waterproofing Spray Applied: $4.00sq.ft. 1,936 Required 3,840 Required $23,104.00(include excavation and
(Qty) backfill)
Drainage Tile Systems / $18.00ln.ft. 242 Required 480 Required $12,996.00(include excavation and
Foundation Drainage: backfill)
Other: Replace stair/retaining wall $10,000.00allowance Required $10,000.00Replace stair/retaining wall
assembly assembly
Sum: $46,100.00 $22,100.00 $24,000.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 16 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys


Description: The existing structure is constructed with masonry bearing wall assemblies with brick exteriors. District officials noted the structure underwent
extensive masonry restoration in 1999 but there are several areas of new deterioration, especially at the north and east fascade of the structure.
A portion of the 1949 building contains several prominate cracks in the walls and adjoining floor structure. The noted area of deterioration extends
through multiple floor levels and a portion of the masonry structures are displaced from building movement. District officials reported the severity
of deterioration has been progressing over several years despite attempts to repair. The cracks in the floor structures were covered with trim
plates due to the progression of cracking at these areas. Several of the masonry lintels display evidence of corrosion.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide masonry cleaning, replace deteriorated lintels, copmlete masonry repairs, and provide masonry sealing. Provide for structure analysis
and field invesigation at area of deterioration at the 1949 building and complete all recommended repairs.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Classroom Wing Sum Comments
Building (1925) Addition (1949) Addition (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Tuckpointing: $7.50sq.ft. 1,951 Required 800 Required 408 Required $23,692.50(wall surface)
(Qty)
Exterior Masonry $1.50sq.ft. 9,756 Required 7,948 Required 8,152 Required $38,784.00(wall surface)
Cleaning: (Qty)
Exterior Masonry $1.00sq.ft. 9,756 Required 7,948 Required 8,152 Required $25,856.00(wall surface)
Sealing: (Qty)
Replace Brick Veneer $30.00sq.ft. 30 Required $900.00(total removal and replacement including
System: (Qty) pinning and shoring)
Masonry Lintel $250.00ln.ft. 200 Required 12 Required $53,000.00(total removal and replacement including
Replacement: pinning and shoring)
Install Control Joints $60.00ln.ft. 160 Required 192 Required 192 Required $32,640.00
Other: Structural $30,000.00allowance Required $30,000.00Structural repairs allowance.
Repairs
Other: Structural $5,000.00allowance Required $5,000.00Structural analysis allowance.
analysis
Sum: $209,872.50 $99,522.50 $75,390.00 $34,960.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 17 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs


Description: The floor construction for the entire complex is slab on grade construction and a steel joist system. The roof system for the structure is a steel
joist system. There was no significant evidence of deterioration except for area noted in Plate ’’G’’.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: No work required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)SumComments
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 18 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes
Description: The current finishes throughout the complex are dated. Casework is wood and worn. The majority of the complex is lacking cubbies/lockers.
Classrooms and corridors are equipped with coat hooks. District official did not provide the exact date of kitchen equipment but noted the majority
of kitchen equipment is dated.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for replacement of all finishes, casework, lockers/cubbies and kitchen equipment due to age/condition and extent of renovation work.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Classroom Wing Classroom Wing Sum Comments
Building Building (1925) Addition (1949) Addition (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Complete Replacement $14.30sq.ft. Required Required Required $748,962.50(elementary, per building area, with removal of existing)
of Finishes and
Casework:
Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00per 5 Required 8 Required 6 Required $19,000.00(removing and replacing)
stall
Toilet Accessory $0.20sq.ft. Required Required Required $10,475.00(per building area)
Replacement
Total Kitchen Equipment $141.00sq.ft. 662 Required $93,342.00(square footage based upon only existing area of food
Replacement: (Qty) preparation, serving, kitchen storage areas and walk-ins.
Includes demolition and removal of existing kitchen
equipment)
Sum: $871,779.50 $419,604.00 $295,245.00 $156,930.50

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 19 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting
Description: The entire complex contains fluorescent and incandescent lighting. Lighting levels are: Computer lab 39.4 FC, Art 61.0 FC, Science classroom
44.5 FC, Media Center 41.1 FC, and Typical classrooms 29.3 FC - 36.7 FC.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting due to addition of a suppression system, HVAC system, and under illuminated spaces.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments
Building (1925) (1949) (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Complete Building Lighting $5.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $261,875.00Includes demo of existing
Replacement fixtures
Sum: $261,875.00 $110,780.00 $99,050.00 $52,045.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 20 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems
Description: The current security system is a motion sensor security system with magnetic lock controlled entry. Site lighting is provided by a combination of
building mounted and a few pole mounted fixtures. The provisions provide limited illumination at the exterior site.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide upgrade of the current security system and exterior lighting to conform to OSDM standards.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)Sum Comments
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Security System: $1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $78,562.50(complete, area of building)
Exterior Site Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $52,375.00building
Sum: $130,937.50 $55,390.00 $49,525.00 $26,022.50

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 21 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
Description: The complex is equipped with exit signs and emergency egress lighting. The system was updated in the recent past. A portion of the existing
fixture installations are ceiling mounted and will be disturbed by recommended renovation work.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of the emergency/egress lighting system due to the addition of sprinkler and HVAC systems.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments
Building (1925) (1949) (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Emergency/Egress $1.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $52,375.00(complete, area of
Lighting: building)
Sum: $52,375.00 $22,156.00 $19,810.00 $10,409.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 22 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm
Description: The complex is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pull stations with zoned detection horn/strobe signals. The existing system is
lacking horn/strobe signals in a portion of the occupiable rooms/spaces.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of the fire alarm. Provide an addressable system with horn/strobe signals in all occupiable rooms/spaces
throughout the entire complex.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments
Building (1925) (1949) (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Fire Alarm $1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $78,562.50(complete new system, including removal of
System: existing)
Sum: $78,562.50 $33,234.00 $29,715.00 $15,613.50

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 23 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access
Description: The existing complex is not accessible and does not conform to the provisions of the ADA. Toiletroom/Restroom throughout the structure are not
accessible. A portion of the existing door assemblies do not provide the required manuvering clearances. The majority of the existing door
installations are equipped with lever hardware but many of door units are dated. Interior and exterior level change are not accessible. The
complex was constructed on a sloping site providing a split level floor arrangement. Multiple elevators and/or lifts are required to provide access
to all floor levels. A portion of the drinking fountains provide accessible accomodations but do not provide multi-height provisions.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for full accessibility throughout the entire complex in conformance with the provisions of the ADA and OSFC requirements.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Classroom Wing Sum Comments
Building (1925) Addition (1949) Addition (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required Required Required $5,237.50(per building area)
Ramps: $40.00sq.ft. 180 Required $7,200.00(per ramp/interior-exterior complete)
(Qty)
Lifts: $15,000.00unit 3 Required 2 Required $75,000.00(complete)
Elevators: $50,000.00each 3 Required 2 Required $250,000.00(per stop, $100,000 minimum)
Electric Water $3,000.00unit 3 Required 3 Required 2 Required $24,000.00(new double ADA)
Coolers:
Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $3,800.00unit 6 Required 7 Required 9 Required $83,600.00(new ADA)
Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 1 Required 2 Required 4 Required $7,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)
ADA Assist Door & $7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)
Frame:
Replace Doors: $1,100.00leaf 31 Required 34 Required 28 Required $102,300.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroom
door/light, includes hardware)
Replace Doors: $5,000.00leaf 2 Required 4 Required 8 Required $70,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door,
HM frame, door/light, includes hardware)
Sum: $631,837.50 $288,815.60 $126,981.00 $216,040.90

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 24 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition
Description: Buses load/unload along a separated drive at the main entry to the school complex. The parking areas were updated in 2000. Portions of the
asphalt pavements display signs of deterioration, especially at areas adjacent to the existing playground. Sidewalks are deteriorated in limited
areas. An existing walkway ramp was constructed with a plywood assembly. Playground equipment was recently updated. A limited quantity of
the equipment displays evidence of deterioration, a portion of the equipment are wood structures. Soft surface play areas do not contain a
containment barrier. Portions of the site were covered with snow at time of site visit, hindering full assessment of site conditions.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Replace deteriorated walks, curbing and pavement. Provide for replacement of deteriorated playground and/or wood play structures. Provide a
soft surface containment barrier at all play structures. Replace the plywood walk assembly with a permanent walkway ramp, provision identified in
Plate ’’O’’.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Classroom Wing Classroom Wing Sum Comments
Building Building (1925) Addition (1949) Addition (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Playground Equipment: $1.50sq.ft. 4,432 Required 3,962 Required 2,081 Required $15,712.50(up to $100,000, per sq.ft. of school)
(Qty)
Removal of existing Playground $2,000.00lump sum Required $2,000.00
Equipment:
Replace Existing Asphalt Paving: $30.00sq. yard 1,441 Required 1,303 Required 686 Required $102,900.00(including drainage / tear out for light or
heavy duty asphalt)
Asphalt Paving (light duty) / New $16.00sq. yard 1,385 Required 1,253 Required 660 Required $52,768.00(includes minor crack repair in less than
Wearing Course: 5% of paved area)
Concrete Curb: $15.00ln.ft. 570 Required 152 Required 80 Required $12,030.00(new)
Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft. 538 Required 486 Required 256 Required $5,120.00(5 in exterior slab)
(Qty)
Exterior Hand / Guard Rails: $42.50ln.ft. 20 Required $850.00
Base Sitework Allowance for $50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two.
Unforeseen Circumstances (Applies for whole building, so only one
addition should have this item)
Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen $1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $78,562.50Include this one or the next. (Each
Circumstances for buildings between 0 addition should have this item)
SF and 100,000 SF
Sum: $319,943.00 $168,824.00 $99,020.00 $52,099.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 25 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System
Description: The complex sanitary piping system is served by the local municipal system. School officials noted the system functioned satisfactorily.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: No work required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)SumComments
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 26 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply
Description: The complex water supply is copper. The system is served by the local municipal system. No pressure problems were reported by District
officals. An abandoned well remains on site.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Fill cap or remove abandoned well.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments
Building (1925) (1949) (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Other: Fill cap or remove $5,000.00allowance Required $5,000.00Fill cap or remove
abandoned well abandoned well.
Sum: $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 27 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors
Description: The existing door assemblies are a combination of newer and dated installations. A portion of the assemblies are deteriorated and/or contain
single pane glazing.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for replacement of dated/deteriorated door assemblies. Replace door assemblies equipped with single pane glazing with thermally
efficient installations.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments
Building (1925) (1949) (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Door Leaf/Frame and $2,000.00per 4 Required 4 Required $16,000.00(includes removal of
Hardware: leaf existing)
Sum: $16,000.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 $8,000.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 28 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material
Description: District officials have provided information identifying hazardous materials in this facility.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Remove all hazardous material as identified by the hazardous material consultant. A full EEHA will be required to verify the accuracy of the
provided information.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments
Building (1925) (1949) (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form ‹
Resilient Flooring Removal, Including $3.00sq.ft. 25,000 Required $75,000.00See J
Mastic (Qty)
Sum: $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 29 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety
Description: The entire complex is not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. A portion of the interior stairways are not enclosed and the
handrail/guardrail systems do not conform to current code provisions or ADA accessibility requirements.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide an automated fire suppression system throughout the entire complex. Enclose open stair assemblies and provide a compliant handrail
system.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Classroom Wing Sum Comments
Building (1925) Addition (1949) Addition (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
Sprinkler / Fire $3.25sq.ft. 22,156 Required 19,810 Required 10,409 Required $170,218.75(includes increase of service piping, if
Suppression System: (Qty) required)
Interior Stairwell Closure: $5,000.00per 4 Required 4 Required 2 Required $50,000.00(includes associated doors, door
level frames and hardware)
Generator: $40,000.00unit 1 Required $40,000.00(75 KW w/fence and pad/day tank
only, life safety only)
Handrails: $5,000.00level 6 Required 6 Required 2 Required $70,000.00
Sum: $330,218.75 $162,007.00 $114,382.50 $53,829.25

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 30 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings
Description: Typical classrooms are furnished with a combination of newer and older equipment. The majority of the media center addition is equipped with
newer age furnishings.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for furnishing replacement based upon the rating of 4 given for Item 6.17 of the attached CEFPI rating.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)Sum Comments
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
CEFPI Rating 4 to 5$4.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $209,500.00
Sum: $209,500.00 $88,624.00 $79,240.00 $41,636.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 31 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

W. Technology
Description: Typical classrooms are equipped with 4-5 data ports for teacher and student use, televisions, ceiling mounted projectors, and smart boards.
Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Replace all wiring due to extensive renovations to be undertaken and to fully conform to OSDM standards.

Item Cost Unit Whole Original Building Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments
Building (1925) (1949) (1965)
22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft²
ES portion of building with total SF < $10.68sq.ft. 22,156 Required 19,810 Required 10,409 Required $559,365.00
50,000 (Qty)
Sum: $559,365.00 $236,626.08 $211,570.80 $111,168.12

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 32 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost


Renovation Costs (A-W) $6,245,303.25

7.00% Construction Contingency $437,171.23

Subtotal $6,682,474.48

16.20% Non-Construction Costs $1,082,560.87

Total Project $7,765,035.34

Construction Contingency $437,171.23

Non-Construction Costs $1,082,560.87

Total for X. $1,519,732.09

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Land Survey 0.03% $2,004.74

Soil Borings 0.10% $6,682.47

Agency Approval Fees 0.15% $10,023.71

Construction Testing 0.25% $16,706.19

Printing 0.27% $18,042.68

Advertising 0.03% $2,004.74

Builder’s Risk 0.11% $7,350.72

Design Professional Compensation 7.50% $501,185.59

CM Compensation 6.00% $400,948.47

Commissioning 0.33% $22,052.17

Maintenance Plan Advisor 0.11% $7,350.72

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.32% $88,208.66

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.20% $1,082,560.87

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment Page 33 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Jeff Tuckerman Date of Appraisal 2008-03-18

Building Name Hale Road Elementary

Street Address 56 Hale Rd

City/Town, State, Zip Code Painesville, OH 44077

Telephone Number(s) (440) 352-2300

School District Riverside Local Local SD

Setting: Small City

Site-Acreage 32 Building Square Footage 52,375

Grades Housed K-5 Student Capacity 419

Number of Teaching Stations 28 Number of Floors 3

Student Enrollment 1

Dates of Construction 1925,1949,1965

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction Exterior Surfacing Floor Construction

Load bearing masonry Brick Wood Joists

Steel frame Stucco Steel Joists

Concrete frame Metal Slab on grade

Wood Wood Structural slab

Steel Joists Stone

Back to Assessment Summary

School Facility Appraisal Page 34 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


School Facility Appraisal

Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 25

The building sits on a 32 acre site.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 18

The site is geographically located to serve the school community.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 8

The site is located in a residential area with moderate traffic.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 8

The site contains mature trees, open lawn, and low shrubbery.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 8

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

Playground equipment was updated in the recent past. A limited portion of the equipment displays signs of deterioration.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 4

The complex is constructed on a sloping site, providing split level floor elevations.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 4

There were no significant areas of ponding or erosion. Soils are wet from snow and rain accumulation.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 4

There was no designated area for this activity. The site is equipped with a large playground area surrounded by woods.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 4

A limited portion of pavements were deteriorated.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 5

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

District officials noted there was adequate parking at this facility to serve the needs of the school.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 88

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 35 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


School Facility Appraisal

Points
Structural Allocated
Points

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 5

The majority of the complex does not provide accessible accommodations or conform to the provisions of the ADA guidelines.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 10

The roofs are modified bituminous roof systems. Installations are a combination of newer and older assemblies. The majority of the roofs are dated.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 6

A portion of the exterior walls are cracked with areas of masonry displacement which may be the result of settlement.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 4

The majority of the complex is not equipped with control joints. There were several areas of deterioration.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 7

The location of exits is adequate for student circulation. A portion of the ground floor (basement) is equipped with a dead end corridor.

2.6 Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 7

The majority of the existing window assemblies were updated with thermally efficient units with double pane glazing.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 5

District officials provided a hazardous materials report indicating areas of known asbestos.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 6

The majority of the complex was not designed for flexibility of use.

Points
Mechanical/Electrical Allocated
Points

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 7

Lighting levels do not conform to OSDM standards in many areas.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 11

Domestic supply piping is copper. District officials reported system leaks have been an ongoing issue of concern.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications 15 13

Typical classrooms are equipped with 4-5 data ports and a portion of the classrooms are equipped with projectors and smart boards. Classrooms are not equipped
with telephones.

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 36 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 10

Electrical service panels are located in the mechanical areas. The electrical system is recently updated.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for the 10 8
disabled

The majority of drinking fountains were accessible but do not provide multi-height accomodations.

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 5

The majority of the toilet facilities were not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 6

The site is served by the local municipal system. District officials noted system leaks have been an ongoing issue of concern.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 6

The facility is not equipped with a suppression system. The fire alarm system is lacking horn/strobe signals in some occupiable areas.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between the office 10 5
and instructional areas

Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 3

A limited quantity of hose bibb connections are provided at the exterior of the structure.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features 200 124

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 37 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


School Facility Appraisal

Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 10

The majority of window installations were updated. A portion of the exterior doors were deteriorated.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 8

Floor surfaces were terrazzo, carpet, vinyl tile, and wood. Wood flooring was loose and deteriorated at the 1929 building.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 7

Suspended acoustic ceilings are provided in some areas. A portion of ceilings were plaster.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 5

Casework installations are limited. The majority of casework is dated. A portion of casework was wood.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 9

The majority of the door assemblies were equipped with lever/ADA compliant hardware.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 6

The fixtures were a combination of wall and floor mounted units. Original/dated installations remain in many areas.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 8

The complex is equipped with a large storage area at the ground floor/basement of the structure.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 9

School officials noted electrical provisions were adequate to serve the facilities current needs. The electrical system was recently updated.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 8

Exterior lighting was provided primarily by building mounted fixtures.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 70

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 38 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


School Facility Appraisal

Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 15

Buses load/unload along a separated drive at the main entry to the school.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 8

Walkways are deteriorated in limited areas.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 3

The main ingress/egress drive is not equipped with a signal system.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 4

Vehicular entrances were not equipped with turning lanes.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 4

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The playground equipment was updated in the recent past. A limited portion of the equipment displayed evidence of deterioration.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 15

The boilers were located in the mechanical areas. Classrooms were equipped with unit ventilators.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 10

The facility contains multiple stair assemblies. A portion of the installations were not enclosed in rated assemblies. A portion of the ground floor was equipped with a
dead end corridor.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 8

Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic devices. A portion of installations are deteriorated.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 8

The facility was equipped with an emergency/egress lighting system.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 5

The majority of classroom doors are not recessed and open outward.

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 6

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 39 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


The facility contains a motion sensor system with controlled magnetic lock entry.

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 2

Classrooms/educational areas were equipped with vinyl tile. Corridors were terrazzo and vinyl tile. Tile is suspected to contain asbestos. Flooring is damaged in
many areas.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 4

Stair risers do not exceed 7’’.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 4

Safety glazing was identified at some locations.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Drinking fountains project into corridors.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 3

Main corridors lead to exits. A portion of the school structure is equipped with a dead end corridor.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 13

Fire extinguishers were provided throughout the facility.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 10

Remote means of egress were provided from most areas. A portion of the structure is equipped with a dead end corridor.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 10

Rated assemblies could not be identified. Masonry construction may provide equivalence ratings.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 11

The facility is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pullstations. A portion of the occupiable spaces are lacking horn/strobe signals.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 147

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 40 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


School Facility Appraisal

Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 18

Typical classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 10

There is not designated space for this activity. Classrooms are undersized.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 8

The media center is located in a classroom wing but is remotely located as is the gym from the majority of classrooms.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 5

There is no designated space for this activity, classrooms are undersized.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 5

The majority of the complex was not equipped with lockers or cubbies. Classrooms and corridors were equipped with coat hooks.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 5

Storage space is limited. There is little casework in classrooms.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 9

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 7

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 7

The Media Center is located in a converted classroom area.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 3

The gymnasium is utilized as student dining.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 7

MS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 41 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 3

Music education takes place in a dedicated classroom. There are limited sound treatments.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 3

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 4

Technology education takes place in a dedicated classroom.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 1

There is no designated space for this activity.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 3

Classroom storage provisions are limited.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 6

Accomodations are limited.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 4

The gymnasium serves as student dining. The kitchen is undersized.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served 5 3

Administrative offices are located adjacent to the main entry, space is limited.

5.20 Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 3

Office provisions are limited and the area is dated.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 3

The clinic is undersized and does not conform to the current standards established for the State of Ohio.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 3

Adminstrative areas are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 3

Administrative work space is limited.

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 123

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 42 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


School Facility Appraisal

Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 10

Exterior masonry construction is appropriate for educational design.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 7

The site contains mature trees and open lawn, with few additional amenities.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 7

The site is located in a residential area with moderate traffic.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 8

A portion of entrances were equipped with overhangs.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 2

The facility materials are consistent throughout the complex.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 12

Interior finishes and casework are worn and dated. There was no unified color scheme.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 5

The majority of the facility is not equipped with air conditioning.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 7

The ventilation system does not conform to current OSDM standards.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 10

Lighting levels are below OSDM standards in many areas.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 7

The majority of toilet rooms do not provide accessible accomodations.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 7

The gymnasium and the media center provide the only common areas for socialization.

6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 6

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 43 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


A portion of the complex is equipped with a dead end corridor.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 6

The gymnasium and the media center provide areas for interaction.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 6

The gymnasium also serves as student dining.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 6

Acoustic ceilings are provided in some areas. A portion of ceilings are plaster.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 8

The majority of the window assemblies are equipped with insulated glazing. Installations are updated in most areas.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 4

Furnishings and equipment is a combination of newer and dated installations.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 118

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 44 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24


Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Hale Road Elementary

K-5

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. The building is not suppressed.

2. The majority of the complex is not equipped with air conditioning.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Back to Assessment Summary

Justification for Allocation of Points Page 45 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Building Summary - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

District: Riverside Local Local SD County: Lake Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Name: Hale Road Elementary Contact: Mr. Jack Miley
Address: 56 Hale Rd Phone: (440) 352-2300
Painesville,OH 44077 Date Prepared: 2008-03-18 By: Tony Schorr
Bldg. IRN: 14845 Date Revised: 2008-08-26 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 32 CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 28
Current Enrollment 1 Classrooms: 26 Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Projected Enrollment N/A Cover Sheet ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
Addition Date HA Number of Current Square 1.0 The School Site 200 176 88% Satisfactory
Floors Feet 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 400 248 62% Borderline
Original Building 1925 no 3 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability 200 140 70% Satisfactory
Classroom Wing 1949 no 3 19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security 400 294 74% Satisfactory
Addition 5.0 Educational Adequacy 400 246 62% Borderline
Classroom Wing 1965 no 2 10,409 6.0 Environment for Education 400 236 59% Borderline
Addition
Commentary ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
Total 52,375
Total 2000 1340 67% Borderline
*HA = Handicapped Access
C=Under Contract
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
Renovation Cost Factor 104.16%
=3 Needs Replacement
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $8,088,060.81
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
FACILITY ASSESSMENT Dollar requested from a Master Plan.
Cost Set: 2007 Rating Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $1,518,875.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $146,937.00 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 2 $80,000.00 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $486,625.00 -
F. Windows 3 $214,500.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 2 $46,100.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $209,872.50 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $871,779.50 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $261,875.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $130,937.50 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $52,375.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $78,562.50 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $631,837.50 -
P. Site Condition 3 $319,943.00 -
Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $5,000.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $16,000.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $75,000.00 -
U. Life Safety 3 $330,218.75 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $209,500.00 -
W. Technology 3 $559,365.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency / - $1,519,732.09 -
Non-Construction Cost
Total $7,765,035.34

Previous Page

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) Page 46 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24
Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) - Original Building

Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) - Original Building

Owner: Riverside Local Local SD Bldg. IRN: 14845

Facility: Hale Road Elementary BuildingAdd: Original Building

Date: Consultant Name:

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Material


ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00
2. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00
3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00
4. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00
5. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00
6. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.00
7. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00
8. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00
9. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00
10. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 25000 $3.00 $75,000.00
11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00
12. (Sum of Lines 1-11) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $75,000.00
13. (Sum of Lines 1-9) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost


1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 1980


1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.00
2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $0.00
3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not Applicable


Area Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost
1. 22156 0 $0.05 $0.00

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None Reported


Description Cost Estimate
1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.00
2. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries


1. A12, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $75,000.00
2. A13, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $0.00

* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):

a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.

b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,
acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.

c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.

THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.

<Untitled> Page 47 Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen