Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
China University of Political Science and Law An Overview of Chinese Legal System
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to make an analysis about how the concepts of Fa and Li interacted between each other along the Chinese legal history, starting with a brief summary of the dynastic eras, and focusing in what we could call modern legal history, what I consider starts on the late Qing Dynasty. The analysis ends with the admission of China to the WTO, because I think that is a topic that deserves a whole new article for itself, and due to time limitations cannot be developed properly. The reason why I have chosen this theme is because I firmly believe that to be able to understand nowadays legal debates and legislation is necessary to have an idea about the broad historical and ideological Chinese framework. Along the more than 5.000 years of history, China has reinvented itself several times, learning from the hits and misses, unsurprisingly legal principles and legislation has followed the same stream. This papers starts with the genesis of the Li and Fa concepts, relating it with the Confucianism and legalism philosophies. Then, the each section illustrates an important period in Chinese history, emphasizing the situation of the law. Those sections comprehends, the late Qing dynasty, the republican era, the changes during the communist era, the application of the cultural revolution and the effects of Deng Xiaoping open policy.
China University of Political Science and Law An Overview of Chinese Legal System
way to arbitrariness masqueraded as legal forms. Even if finally the Qin dynasty collapsed as a result of the public outcry, the legalism school was not disposed, subsequent dynasties used written codes (such as the Tang Code). As response to this philosophical doctrine and to the social disorder prevailing at that time, the Confucianism philosophy came on the scene. Kong Fuzi philosophical activity focused on finding the response to the chaos to restore the road to social harmony quickly became the most important Oriental scholar. His philosophy rescued the values needed to achieve social harmony (virtue, loyalty, trust, respect others, dynamism, etc.). Confucius is undoubtedly the strongest figure of traditional Chinese culture. During the Han Dynasty, Confucianism was established as the official philosophy of the empire, in an attempt to achieve the government of men, or in other words, the government of the virtue. The foundation to regulate the social behavior was the example set by the leaders; social harmony is attained by the individual acceptance of moral rules rather than external law coercion. The differences between people were solved according to the principles of the Li, which is why the contemporary Chinese doctrine advocates the direct reconciliation as the primary path of resolving disputes between the parties involved in any kind of disagreement.
China University of Political Science and Law An Overview of Chinese Legal System
forms and Western legal terminology prevailed. Since 1950, a new process of transplantation of laws started, this time with a remarkable influence of the Soviet Union legislation, in detriment of the West law schools. Even if the Maoist hierarchy called this period as the "legal construction age", in practice, the principles of laws, laws, terms and even the Soviet study manuals were copied and taught in the Chinese forum. Legal institutions such as courts, prosecutors and the legal profession were renewed following the Soviet Union model. It began, according to these standards, the work for the enactment of a new Civil Code and a Criminal. Economic laws, that were few and ambiguous, were designed to assist the five-year planning of the communist model. China tried to consolidate the transition from the democratic revolution to a socialist society. To do this, in the economic sphere, the laws had to facilitate public ownership of the means of production and the development of the planned economy. In the political field, was essential to underpin the democratic dictatorship and strengthen the Party supremacy. Finally, on the ideological level, they went further into the Marxist theory by eliminating the bourgeois and reactionary remnants of the imperial era and Kuomintang. The few laws enacted at this time safeguard China's path to socialism. The Constitution for example, indicated that with the planned industrialization and the Marxist revolution the capitalist exploitation as a preliminary step to achieve a communist society. Thus, private property was set aside and the few capitalists left were forced to establish joint ventures with the state. At the end of this campaign, private companies disappeared and consequently the laws that regulated them putting away any vestiges of market rules. The economy was centralized following the image of the Russian model. In such an orthodox system, the law was not relevant. In this context, State enterprises just executed the directives of the political hierarchy. Economic laws were based more in administrative regulations than in legal acts and the civil law was practically nonexistent.
China University of Political Science and Law An Overview of Chinese Legal System
closed. Lawyers, judges, court personnel and law professors were also sent to the countryside to be reeducated. The courts were closed and a dictatorship, where the punishments were administered by the Red Guards, was established. This group did not hesitate to arrest without warrant and execute without trial, no law constrained the actions of the Red Guard. The law was seen by Maoist supporters, as an instrument of capitalism that restricted the revolutionary zeal. The most similar thing to a supreme law was the Red Book, a series of selected thoughts of Mao Zedong. After the Maos Death (1976) a change of course was only a matter of time. One of the key concerns of Party officials when Deng Xiaoping took office was to restore the law within the State. To achieve this, the leaders were determined to create an effective legal system that would preserve the social stability and protect the individual rights. Deng ends with the legal nihilism and started a gradual reform of laws enacting the foundation stone of the new Chinese legal system: the Constitution. The Legal modernization was a step to access foreign investment. The mandarins used the law as a means to stay in power and prevent sudden social changes, thus legitimating the leadership of the new party.
China University of Political Science and Law An Overview of Chinese Legal System
The Neolegalism
The reformers realized the impossibility of developing a country without a minimum amount of legal institutions that guarantee the necessary political stability for the proper development of economic activities. Being attractive for foreign investors was the central motif of the first stage of reforms. Following this line of thought, the designers of the new Chinese legal system rescued the old school of "legalism" without falling into the excesses of the Qin ("a bad law is better than no law"). They were careful not to overstate the importance of the Fa by considering that the positive law is the unique and necessary means of political domination. Unlike the early imperial conception, law is regarded just as a convenient means to achieve economic and social development. The proclamation of the third plenary session of the XI Congress of the Communist Party charted the way: establish a legal system based on the codification of written laws, create an independent judicial system and ensure equality of persons before the law. Since 1979, a process of prolific legislative output begins, even recovered the force of some laws repealed during the Cultural Revolution. The inflection point of this process was the enactment of the Constitution of 1982, in which the modernizing project of Deng Xiaoping is given legal status, as can be inferred from the preamble: "This Constitution affirms the achievements of the struggles of the Chinese people of all nationalities and defines the basic system and basic tasks of the state in legal form; it is the fundamental law of the state and has supreme legal authority." In that paper, the path for the progressive construction of Chinese legal system was set. Considering the unique context, this task was a difficult road, as Deng himself warned: our country has no tradition to abide and enforce the law, it is essential that we continue working to establish a truth legal system.
China University of Political Science and Law An Overview of Chinese Legal System
retaining wall against the negative aspects of authoritarianism, in practice, the Party (or the moral correctness of their leaders) guided all the different state organs. The Confucian tradition emphasizes the settlement of disputes through informal mediation methods between the parties. Legal rules are perceived as foreign to the moral (li) whose compliance must be based on the will of each subject. Consequently, contract law gave great importance to the extrajudicial settlement of disputes. Even today, Chinese contract law prescribed that the initiation of legal proceedings is the last resort to resolve disputes between persons. Moreover, the Constitution provides the existence of mediation agencies as the People's Mediation Commission, whose sole function mediate disputes of the people. It should also be pinpointed that the institutional predilection towards alternative means of dispute has also other reasons besides the Confucian heritage, also relies on the historical institutional inability to provide legal services to such a vast population.
China University of Political Science and Law An Overview of Chinese Legal System
Conclusions
This paper has attempted to provide a brief look at the complex background of the Chinese legislation that has evolved, and also involved, according to the course of history. The legislation as we know it nowadays is the result of all the steps forwards and backwards along each period. Its like a living organism, that we need to know where it comes from to understand where is aiming to go. If we think about the changes during recent years within historical standards, it has been too fleeting. In just a quarter century the legal system has been reinvented from the ground, inserting also a brand new economic model while designing the regulatory framework to support it. Al this combined with a number of disparate variants such as culture, tradition and the new political turn. All western critics must consider the fact that Chinese modern legislation is really recent, and it is still maturing, they cannot expect China to achieve a legislation system as the one some (not all) western countries has developed during more than two centuries (we can consider that the codification wave started with the Napoleonic code en 1804). To be admitted to the WTO, China had to reach some regulation standards, what had already done, but it did not finished there. Since 2001 the legislation has improve significantly in areas such as criminal law, company law, securities law, civil law, just to mention some. And It is not giving signs of turning in another direction. The Chinese legislation has developed in a pendulum motion between the Li and the Fa, trying and struggling constantly on finding a balanced position that meets the social requirements and the state objectives. However, I could say that maybe nowadays we have achieve a situation where both concept are respectful from each other. It is a risky statement that can only be judged by the History. I also have tried to draw attention to the potential that gives to western countries the study of the legal culture of China. Not only because of the increasing size as an actor in the global economy, but also because it opens a window to a complete new cultural experience. The law in China has developed in conditions completely different from the rest of the world, however, allows parallels amazing. For instance discussions on the age-old dichotomy in doctrines such as Legalism and Confucianism can be assimilated to the Western own antagonism between legal positivism and natural law.
China University of Political Science and Law An Overview of Chinese Legal System
Bibliography
BENITEZ, Florencia. La incorporacin de elementos Jurdicos europeos en China Instituto de Investigaciones Jurdicas UNAM, Ciudad de Mxico, 2007. FOLCH, Dolors: La Construccion del China, Peninsula/Atalaya, 2002. HE, Baogang. Confucianism versus Liberalism over Minority Rights: A Critical Response to Will Kymlicka. JCP 31.1, 2004. HUANG, Philipp C. C.; Code, Custom and Legal Practice in China The Qing and the Republic compared; Stanford University Press; California 2001. JONES, William C. Trying to Understand the Current Chinese Legal System, in Understanding Chinas Legal System, C. Stephen Hsu (ed.), 2003. WANG, Yan: Chinese Legal Reform, Routledge 2001.