DO NOT THINK GEOLOGY OF THE EARTH LOCALLY BUT THINK GEOLOGY OF THE EARTH UNIVERSALLY BY ANIL KUMAR THANVI

If we consider lithological, paleontological and geological evidences data on the surface base i.e. local stage then all are correct, everything is right and there may be a super continent. But if we consider long celestial churning process of twisting in both hemispheres in opposite directions clockwise and counter-clockwise and at the same time squeezing on poles in oscillatory manner then there appear a complete different scenery of evolution of continents and oceans. I say about my idea about geological development of the Earth after study of a oscillatory theme that exist in universe in very general form and this is applicable for each of celestial object. So on large universal scale there was no super continent on the Earth but if we merely consider only local or surface base geology in the Earth geological boundary there exist a super continent that would every body agree. So before take decision we fit data on local geological base or consider these complete geological processes on large universal base that is much more appropriate. The Earth is part of universe and not free from basic properties of universe. Nature of universe is oscillatory then there should be oscillatory nature in all celestial objects and finally in the Earth also. Geological processes are results of long universe process then there are very violent role of universal process that finally appear in the Earth not merely geologically but also biologically. We can not consider whole geology of the Earth separately from nature of all very common properties of celestial objects and universe. We have to include universal common in the Earth also. If we fit and use all lithological and paleontological data for a super continent everything
1

is right that I say locally it is correct. But if we consider on very large scale process and in very general case then we have to universally say there was no super continent. I mean that the idea of super continent came in the mind of geologists because of collecting merely local evidences but after collecting universal common data about variable oblateness, differential rotation, retrograde orbiting and model of dark matter and dark energy then a new and complete different geology begin to appear that we cannot ignore. We cannot understand the evolution of continents and oceans, plate tectonics, continental drifts and all other about geology of earth without differential rotation, variable oblateness, retrograde orbiting... that are common properties of all celestial bodies. So merely study of rocks, minerals, fossils, magnetism and all other geological things... cannot explore the real nature of our earth but we have to study most common things among celestial bodies that also play important role and affect whole geology of the earth. So only study geology of earth's surface and earth's interior is insufficient and cannot give correct nature of geological events. WE CANNOT SAY THERE WAS A SUPER CONTINENT WITHOUT STUDY OF GEOLOGICAL NATURE OF COMPLETE GLOBE OF THE EARTH. IF WE SAY AFTER STUDY OF MINERALS, ROCKS, MAGNETISM, FOSSILS, ANIMALS, PLANTS, CLIMATE, FAULTS, FOLDS AND MANY OTHER GEOLOGICAL FEATURES OF DIFFERENT PLACES AND THEN BY CORRELATING THOSE PLACES WE CONCLUDE THAT IN THIS GEOLOGICAL TIME PERIOD THERE WAS A SUPER CONTINENT NAMED PANGAEA, RODINIA, COLUMBIA OR SOME OTHER THIS IS COMPLETELY WRONG AND A VERY SHORT SCALE CONCLUSION. Now the system of earth is not so much ideal and it does not uniformly obey the complete universal laws. The earth system is now remnant universal system and there are so much deformations in its that it is now very slowly going far from its real ideal universal laws. So the super continent philosophy is result of such deformations.
2