Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

1John Henry Doe

22000 SavingGrace court.


3Wonderland,
4Republic of California
5Private Attorney
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
10
11 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case no. MC-LV-IN-TR-XXXXXXXXX
12 )
13 Plaintiff )
14 )
15 vs. )
16 )
17 )
18 JOHN HENRY DOE )
19 )
20 Defendant )
21
22 John Henry Doe )
23 )
24 Counter-Plaintiff )
25 )
26 vs. )
27 ) CONTEMPT OF COURT,
28 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) FRAUD UPON THE COURT
29 Et al ) DISMISSAL OF CHARGES
30
31 The court comes now to review the facts, record and processes that produced the issuance of the order:
32 “RE-SETTING TRAFFIC COURT TRIAL”, by Judge ROY BEAN.
33
34 Judge BEAN vacated the original trial date as was the wish of this court put forth in the WRIT OF
35 ERROR, dated July 4th, 2009, wherein the defects evident in the arraignment were presented.
36
37 Notice to the Principal is notice to the Agent, and Notice to the Agent is notice to the Principal
38
39 This court stated in the [WRIT OF ERROR] dated July 4th, 2009, “This court orders the clerk of the
40 court IMMA SLAVE to record no more orders in this case without this courts approval.” The Deputy
1 Clerk, IMMA SUBSLAVE was therefore in contempt of court for recording the “RE-SETTING
2 TRAFFIC COURT TRIAL” order.
3
4 This court recognizes the undue influence the Judge has on [his] Clerk and therefore excuses the
5 Deputy Clerk for his actions.
6 This court holds Judge Brennan in contempt of court for entering the order against the wishes of this
7 court put forth in the WRIT OF ERROR. This court orders ROY BEAN to pay $1 to the Clerk.
8
9 In addition this court finds Judge BEAN has committed a fraud upon the court by entering false
10 information into a government document as evidenced in line 15 of the “RE-SETTING TRAFFIC
11 COURT TRIAL” wherein it is written the “Defendant has plead NOT GUILTY to a violation of
12 Section(s) XXXX(A)VC”
13
14 The verified affidavit’s from the defendant/counter-plaintiff [John Doe] and another witness [Joan of
15 Ark] show, that it was Judge BEAN who entered a plea of “not guilty”.
16
17 Judge BEAN was denied power of attorney by John to enter a plea on the defendant/counter-plaintiffs
18 behalf, as shown in the transcript of the arraignment in the affidavit.
19
20 I, John Doe accept Judge Clayton Brennan’s oath of office as a binding bi-lateral agreement.
21
22 In addition judge BEAN continues to falsely identify the defendant/counter-plaintiff as [JOHN
23 HENRY DOE], when court documents have been mailed correctly identifying [John Doe] as the
24 recipient. John has in fact noticed the court of this misnomer in the May 17th 2009 letter to the court,
25 and again, in the arraignment as shown in the affidavit(s) of the transcript.
26
27 Judge BEAN also fails to show the counter-claim action started against ROY BEAN by the
28 defendant/counter-plaintiff on June 16th, 2009.
29
30 Because there has been no lawful cause of action shown to exist in this matter, this court has ruled that
31 this case, and the counter-claim shall be dismissed with prejudice.
1
2 Further, the magistrate, plaintiff, and defendants are invited to each file and serve on all
3 other interested parties a brief no later than August 21st 2009 to show cause to this court
4 why this order should not take effect or should be modified. The court, mindful of the
5 rights of the parties and the importance of fair play, will liberally construe the arguments
6 presented.
7 THE COURT
8 WITNESS: the SEAL of the COURT this 4th day of August 2009
9
10
11 ______________________
12
13 John Doe
14 Private Attorney

15
16
17 Not to be included in any paperwork to court:
18 This is not to be construed as legal advice. See my other examples for notes on how to prepare filings
19 using Microsoft Word. A very important rule in Law is that an unrebutted affidavit stands as truth. An
20 affidavit is a signed declaration wherein the ‘affiant’ (one making the declaration of facts or events)
21 has that declaration Notarized. The Notary is an agent of the court and can attest to you ‘swearing’ it’s
22 true. Once your Notice (in this case “Contempt of Court”) is sent to the court although not notarized,
23 you have a pre-existing agreement with them, and you give them a reasonable amount of time to
24 respond say 21 days or ? as your time constraints allow, and they don’t respond it goes to default and
25 it becomes the truth. So a time limit has to be set. Once the fail to respond and they always do. Then
26 send in the default.
27 All Praise to Bill Thornon see his site http://1215.org/lawnotes/index.html and purchase his DVD’s at
28 http://1215.org/seminar/denniswhipple.htm
29
30