Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
J. P. Gore Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University W. Lafayette, IN 47907 - 1003
Acknowledgment: Work Supported by Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland, with Dr. Howard Baum serving as NIST Scientific Officer. The work summarized here is a result of MS and PhD dissertations by Dr. X. C. Zhou
P U R D U E
Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications University of Minnesota October 11-13, 1999
OUTLINE
P 1. MOTIVATION 2. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES 3. THEORETICAL METHOD 4. LDV MEASUREMENTS AND DISCUSSION 5. PIV MEASUREMENTS AND DISCUSSION 6. THERMAL EXPANSION SOURCE TERM AND VORTICITY DISTRIBUTION 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories School of Mechanical Engineering
U R D U E
MOTIVATION
P
1. Air entrainment of accidental fires influences gas temperatures, radiation properties, fire growth rate and toxicity of smoke. 2. Existing correlations of air entrainment show a large scatter due to different measurement techniques and boundary conditions. 3. In many numerical simulations an entrainment constant is assumed. 4. Recent optical techniques provide an opportunity to measure the instantaneous and mean entrainment velocity field.
U R D U E
DEFINITION OF ENTRAINMENT
P Local Air Entrainment Rate:
ment 2 d Ri r ux dr dx 0 2 R i ur
U R D U
ux dr mf
x u dx 0 r
2 Ri
ment ,0
P U R D U E
Yih
Thomas et al. McCaffrey
1952
1963
1979
& ent = 0.055xQ 01 / 2 m &f m & ent = 0.008 x1 / 2 Q 0 4 / 5 m &f m & ent = 0.043Q( x / Q 0 0.4 0.037 ) m & ent = 0.053x 1.3Q 0 0.48 m &f m & ent = 0.070 D1 / 2 Q 0 ( x / Q 0 0.4 0.0337) m & ent = 0.073( x + 0.06)1.25 m
2 & ent = 0.21( g m Q0
No
Yes
1980
No
Yes
1982
No
Yes
1982
No
Yes
1982
Yes
Yes
1983
Yes
No
1984
/ C p T )
1/ 3
(x x v )
5/ 3
No
Yes
1984
& ent = 0.034 g1 / 2 x 5 / 2 m & ent m x Fr = 0.086 &f f (S + 1) m D & ent m x Fr = 0.093 &f f (S + 1) m D & ent m x Fr = 0.018 &f f (S + 1) m D
1/ 2
No
No
Delichatsios
1987
Yes
3/ 2
5/2
1988
Yes
Zukoski
1994
Yes
Very weakly
P U R D U E
0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14 f 0.12 / (S+1) mm ent f Fr 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 x/D 0.8 1.0 1.2
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
P
1. Consider air entrainment as a fire induced flow field using Baum s kinematic model, which involves flow components induced by vorticity and thermal expansion. 2. Develop and utilize techniques to measure the fire induced flow field for model validation. 3. Develop and utilize techniques to measure the vorticity and thermal expansion that induce the fire induced flow, to avoid uncertainties of combustion models. 4. Compare the measured and predicted fire induced flow field to validate the overall model.
U R D U E
r ~ V V V
where
and
V 0 ~ V 0
P U R
x x e r r e
): ,
r V
r V
~ (V V)
irrotational component:
V Q
Written is terms of a potential function (
D U
x2
1 (r ) r r r
(a)
r V
p and
r V
~ (V V)
imcompressible component is:
~ V
E
1 r e r r
):
~ V
Written is terms of a stream function
p
(
~ V
1 x e r x
(b)
2 2
r2
1 r r
r p
P U R
( x* )
B( x* ) 2n 1
D U E
Assuming Gaussian profiles, the axial velocity and excess temperature distributions are
r ux (r ) U( x ) exp{ [r / R ( x )]2 }
r (r )
( x ) exp{ [r / R ( x )]2 }
U R D U E
Vorticity Distribution:
p(r)
U R D U E
Free Boundaries:
1 XR 2
r(i) The Pool Burner The Floor
5/3
r2
x2
F( )
r2 ( )
x2
cos
d 2F d
2
10F 9(1
2
F(0) = F(1) = 0
U R D U
at r = 0 for all x
On outer boundaries:
r(i)
1 XR 4 r2
5/3
x2
Pool Burner
F( )
r2 ( )
x2
E
cos
d 2F d
2
10F 9(1
2
F(-1) = F(1) = 0
P U R D U E
2 2 re rw ( n 2 x
s)
(r
w ) xp
2 r r 2 rw ) xp Q( r )( e 2
aP P
n x(p) W w P e E x (p) s x (p) n
aE E a W W
aN N
aS S
dP
aE aW aN aS aP dP
r x( e ) re r x( w ) rw
2 2 re r w 1
xn(p) xp(p)
xs(p)
xn xs aN aS
r (p) e
2 2 re r w 1
2 aE a W
2 r r 2 rw ) x Q( r )( e 2
Multigrid Scheme
P
~ ci, j i, j ~ ~ ~ c ip, j ip, j c im, j im, j c i , jp i , jp ~ c i , jm i , jm Di, j
U R D U E
U R D U E
ur ( i, j)
~ ( i, j) u r
Comparison of the predictions and the correlations of the axial velocities at x = 42.5 cm
P U
300 250 200 150 100 50 Axial Velocity, cm/s 0 0 5 10 Radial Position, cm 15 20 Numerical Modeling Correlations of McCaffrey (1983)
R D U E
U R D U E
40
U R D U E
250 200 150 100 50 0 0 5 10 15 Radial Position, cm The predicted axial velocity at x=42.5 cm 1 m by 4 m computational domain Prediction Grid size r= 1 cm, x= 1 cm r= 0.5 cm, x= 1 cm
20
The Enclosure
P U R D U E
P U R D U E
100
Weckman Beyler Thomas Cetegen 1989 1983 1965 1984 Acetone Propane Ethanol Nat. Gas
10
Toner
1987
Nat. Gas
7.1 cm LDV, Ri=11.5 cm LDV, Ri=6.5 cm LDV, Ri=4.5 cm LDV, Ri=flame 30 cm LDV(Axial Velocity) 19 cm Hood 91 cm Particle Tracking 19 cm Hood 19 cm Hood 50 cm Hood 19 cm Hood
f fm Fr ent / (S+1)m
1 x/D
10
Vorticity Distributions
P
30 25 20 15 10 POOL EDGE 5 0 20 15 10 5 0 20 15 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Radial Position, cm Average Visible Flame Boundary Farthest Visible Flame Boundary x = 1 cm x = 5 cm x = 9 cm D=7.1cm, Toluene . mf = 83 mg/s Hinterface = 64 cm Lip Height=0.2cm Dfloor= 51 cm
U R D U E
Vorticity, 1/sec
P U R D U E
-5
10
15
20
25
30
P U R D U E
-10
10
20
30
40
50
P U R D U
. D = 7.1 cm, Toluene, mf = 83 mg/s Hinterface = 64 cm, Lip Height = 0.2 cm Dfloor = 51 cm, r = 4.5 cm
x = 5 cm
1 Frequency, Hz
10
100
P U R D U
x = 5 cm
1 Frequency, Hz
10
100
Measurements and Predictions of Axial Velocities around a 7.1 cm Toluene Pool Fire
80 60 40 20 0 -20 60 40 20 0 Vertical Velocity, cm/s Vertical Velocity, cm/s -20 60 40 20 0 -20 3.5 5.5 7.5 9.5 11.5 13.5 Radial Position, cm
x = 1 cm x = 6 cm D = 7.1 cm, Toluene, mf = 83 mg/s Hinterface = 64 cm, Lip Height = 0.2 cm Dfloor = 51 cm x = 12 cm
P U R D
80 60 40 20 0 -20 60 40 20 0 -20 60 40 20 0 -20 3.5 5.5 7.5 9.5 11.5 13.5 Radial Position, cm
x = 1 cm x = 6 cm D = 7.1 cm, Toluene, mf = 83 mg/s Hinterface = 64 cm, Lip Height = 0.2 cm Dfloor = 51 cm x = 12 cm
U E
Measurements and Predictions of Radial Velocities around a 7.1 cm Toluene Pool Fire
40 30 20 10 0 30
x = 6 cm D = 7.1 cm, Toluene, mf = 83 mg/s Hinterface = 64 cm, Lip Height = 0.2 cm Dfloor = 51 cm x = 12 cm
P U R D
40 30 20 10 0 30
x = 6 cm D = 7.1 cm, Toluene, mf = 83 mg/s Hinterface = 64 cm, Lip Height = 0.2 cm Dfloor = 51 cm x = 12 cm
20 10
20 10 0 30
x = 1 cm
U E
0 30
x = 1 cm
P U R D U E
Instantaneous Velocity Vectors around a 7.1 cm Toluene Pool fire with a Floor
10 25 cm/s 9
P U R D U E
A
7
4
Axial Position, cm
Instantaneous Velocity Vectors around a 7.1 cm Toluene Pool fire without a Floor
10
P U R D U E
50 cm/s
4 Axial Position, cm
Pool Edge
10
11
Radial Position, cm
P U
12
A
10
R D U E
Axial Position, cm
Radial Position, cm
P U
12
10
R D U E
Axial Position, cm
Radial Position, cm
P U
12
R
10 8
D
A
U
C
Axial Position, cm
Mean Velocity Vectors around a 7.1 cm Toluene Pool fire with a Floor
Mean entrainment flow field, Toluene, D = 7.1 cm, With a Floor mf = 83 mg/s, Dfloor = 51 cm, Hinterface = 64 cm, Hflame = 32 cm 10 PIV Measurements 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Pool Edge 0 2.5 4.5 6.5 8.5 10.5 2.5 4.5 Pool Edge 6.5 8.5 10.5 12.5 Axial Position, cm 10 cm/s LDV Measurements
P U R D U E
Radial Position, cm
Radial Position, cm
Mean Velocity Vectors around a 7.1 cm Toluene Pool fire without a Floor
10
P U R D U E
50 cm/s
4 Axial Position, cm
Pool Edge
10
11
Radial Position, cm
P U
12
10
R D U E
Axial Position, cm
Radial Position, cm
P U
12
10
R D U E
Axial Position, cm
Radial Position, cm
P U
12
10
R D U E
Axial Position, cm
0 25 cm/s 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Radial Position, cm
Normalized Air Entrainment Rate for 7.1 cm Pool Fires with and without a Floor
0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.18 f 0.16 0.14 / (S+1) m m ent f Fr 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.0 Fuel Pool(cm) Floor(cm) mf(mg/s) Data Toluene 7.1 51 83 Methanol 7.1 51 50 Heptane 7.1 51 70 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 X/D 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 f 0.16 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.167(Z/D)0.78
P U R D U E
0.14(X/D)
0.8
0.14 / (S+1) m m ent f Fr 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.0 Fuel Pool(cm) Floor(cm) mf(mg/s) Data none none none 1.2 83 50 70 1.4 1.6 1.8
Normalized Air Entrainment Rate for 15 and 30 cm Pool Fires without a Floor
0.22 Fuel 0.20 Methanol Heptane Toluene Methanol Toluene Heptane 15 15 15 30 30 30 none none none none none none
0.78 0.135(X/D) 0.78 0.135(Z/D)
P U R D U E
Pool(cm) Floor(cm) mf(mg/s) Data 245 385 370 980 2850 2660
0.18
0.16
0.14 f 0.12 / (S+1) mm ent f Fr 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.0 0.2
0.4
0.6 X/D
0.8
1.0
1.2
P U R
14
Bo
un
da
20 16 12 8 4 20 0 15 X = 9 cm X = 13 cm
12 10 8 6 4 2
Vi
sib
le
Fla
me
Data
10 5
0 14 12 Axial Position, cm 10 8 6 4 Prediction 2 0 6 25 cm/s 1/e width profile according to McCaffrey (1983) 10 12 14 16 18 20 Radial Position, cm 22 24 26 28 1/e width profile used in this prediction
D U
30 0
25 20 15 10 5 30 0 25 20 15 10 5 0 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 X = 1 cm D = 30 cm, Toluene mf = 2850 mg/s, Hlip= 0.5 cm Hflame= 115 cm, Hinterface= 120 cm X = 5 cm
Radial Location, cm
P U
P 1 R 2
(1)
R D
(2)
U
(3)
Substitute eq. (1) into eq. (2) and add to TCp eq. (3):
r V 1 & (Q TC p T)
(4)
P U R D U
(Z),
d dZ
2 d
1/
Z t
2 d
dZ
Z
Z t
(5)
(6)
dZ
3. Conservation of Mixture Fraction:
Z t
4. Substitute eqs. (5)
r V
D Z
and (6) into eq. (3) :
(7)
E
0
(8)
2d
Z dZ t d dZ
r V
2d
dZ
r V
r V
Gas Chromatography
P Column 1: H2, O2, N2, CH4, CO U R D Column 2: CO2, C2H2, C2H4 U E
P U
R D U E
Radial Distribution of Mixture Fraction in the Near Field of 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame P
Natural Gas, D = 7.1 cm, no floor Frf = 0.109, Hflame = 36.4 cm, Gaussian Data 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 1 2 r, cm 3 4 = 0.5 cm = 1.0 cm X = 1.5 cm Logistic
U R D U E
Mixture Fraction
Radial Distribution of Mixture Fraction in the Higher Region of 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame P
Natural Gas, D = 7.1 cm, no floor Frf = 0.109, Hflame = 36.4 cm, Data Gaussian 0.3 Logistic
U R D
0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.8 = 2.0 cm 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 1 2 r, cm 3 4 Mixture Fraction = 5.0 cm
U E
U
CH4
R D U E
0.2
0.8
1.0
U R D U E
Mixture Fraction
U R D U E
Mixture Fraction
P U R D U E
P U R D U
2 Natural Gas Flame D = 7.1 cm, without floor Frf = 0.109, Hflame = 36.4 cm
0 0.0
0.2
0.8
1.0
P U
5e-4 D Data X, cm 4e-4 0.5 chemkin prediction 1.0 1.5 2.0 OPPDIF prediction 2e-4
R D U E
3e-4
1e-4 Natural Gas Flame D = 7.1 cm, without floor Frf = 0.109, Hflame = 36.4 cm 0.2 0.4 0.6 Mixture Fraction Z 0.8 1.0
0e+0
0.0
Thermal Expansion Source Term as a Function of Radial Distance in the Near Field
Natural Gas Flame D = 7.1 cm, without floor Frf = 0.109, Hflame = 36.4 cm 20 15 10 5 0 -5 20 15 10 5 0 -5 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 0 1 2 r, cm 3 4 D dZ/dr)/r, 1/s /d/Z d /d/dr(r = 1.5 cm X = 2.0 cm Measured Correlations Visible Flame
P U R D U E
= 0.5 cm
Thermal Expansion Source Term as a Function of Radial Distance in the Near Field
20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 0 X = 2.0 cm Natural Gas Flame D = 7.1 cm, without floor Frf = 0.109, Hflame = 36.4 cm
P U R D U E
X = 1.5 cm
X = 0.5 cm
2 r, cm
Thermal Expansion Source Term as a Function of Radial Distance in the Higher Region
Natural Gas, D = 7.1 cm no floor, Frf = 0.109 Hflame = 36.4 cm 20 X, cm 2 7 12 Data
P U R D U E
10
-10
-20
20
10
0 0 1 2 r, cm 3 4
Thermal Expansion Source Term as a Function of Radial Distance in the Higher Region
Natural Gas, D = 7.1 cm no floor, Frf = 0.109 Hflame = 36.4 cm 20 X, cm 2 7 12 Data
P U R D U E
10
-10
-20
20
10
0 0 1 2 r, cm 3 4
U R D U E
2.5
2.5
U R D
5 B 4 A
U E
3 Axial Position, cm
0 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Radial Position, cm
Instantaneous Velocity Vectors in the Near Field of a 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame P
8 Buoyant Diffusion Flame No Floor 7 2.0 m/s 6 Natural Gas, Frf = 0.109 D = 7.1 cm, Hflame = 36.4
U R D U E
3 Axial Position, cm
0 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Radial Position, cm
Instantaneous Velocity Vectors in the intermittent Region of a 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame P
31 Buoyant Diffusion Flame Diffuser Burner 4.0 m/s 30 Natural Gas, Frf = 0.109 D = 7.1 cm, without floor
U R D U E
29
28
27 Axial Position, cm
26
25
24 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Radial Position, cm
Instantaneous Velocity Vectors, minus the spatial average velocity vector, 1m/s. P
31 Buoyant Diffusion Flame Diffuser Burner 4.0 m/s 30 Natural Gas, Frf = 0.109 D = 7.1 cm, without floor
U R
29 C 28
D U E
27 Axial Position, cm
26
25
24 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Radial Position, cm
Mean Velocity Vectors in the Near Field of a 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame
8 Buoyant Diffusion Flame No Floor 7 2.0 m/s 6 Natural Gas, Frf = 0.109 D = 7.1 cm, Hflame = 36.4
P U R D U E
3
Axial Position, cm
0 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Radial Position, cm
Mean Velocity Vectors in the Intermittent Region of a 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame
Buoyant Diffusion Flame Diffuser Burner Natural Gas, Frf = 0.109 D = 7.1 cm, without floor
P U R D U E
31
30
29
28
27 Axial Position, cm
26
25
24 -4 -3 -2
4.0 m/s -1 0 1 2 3 4
Radial Position, cm
Radial Profiles of Mean Axial Velocities in the Near Field of a 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame P
Buoyant Diffusion Flame Natural Gas, Frf = 0.109 D = 7.1 cm, without floor 200 160 120 80 40 0 120 80 40 0 x = 4 cm x = 6 cm First measurement Second measurement
U R D U E
60 40 20 0 30 20 10
x = 2 cm
x = 1 cm 0 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Radial Position, cm
Radial Profiles of Vorticities in the Near Field of a 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame P
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 80 60 40 20 0 from velocity field on 0.5 cm grid from velocity field on 0.25 cm grid from smoothed velocity field on 0.25 cm grid x = 6 cm
ur x
ux r
U R
ur ( i, j 1) x( i, j 1) u x ( i 1, j) r ( i 1, j)
x = 4 cm
-20 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 40 20 0 -20 -40 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 x = 1 cm Buoyant Diffusion Flame Natural Gas, Frf = 0.109 D = 7.1 cm, without floor x = 2 cm
ur ( i, j 1) ( i, j) x( i, j 1) u x ( i 1, j) r ( i 1, j)
D U E
Vorticity, 1/sec
Radial Position, cm
U R
0 100 0 80 20 40 60 0 60 40 80 20
6
20 0 80 60 40 100 20 80 60 40
D U
4
20 0 0 80 60 40
80 20 60 40 0 0 0 20 4060 60 40 80 20
3 Axial Position, cm
E
20
2
20 40 60 40 20 0 -20 -20 0 -20
0 20 40 -20 0 -20
1
-20 20 0
0 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Radial Position, cm
Radial Profiles of the Mean Vorticity in The Near Field of a 7.1 cm Natural Gas Flame P
Natural Gas, D = 7.1 cm, no floor Frf = 0.109, Hflame = 36.4 cm 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 80 60 40 20 0 -20 40 20 0 -20 40 20 0 -20 -40 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 = 1 cm dur/dx - dux/dr correlation dur/dx x = 6 cm -dux/dr flame radii
ur x
ux r
U R
ur ( i, j 1) x ( i, j 1) u x ( i 1, j) r ( i 1, j)
( i, j)
= 4 cm
ur ( i, j 1) x ( i, j 1) u x ( i 1, j) r ( i 1, j)
D U E
Vorticity, 1/sec
= 2 cm
Radial Position, cm
r V
U
ux x 1 (rur ) r r
R D U E
U R D U E
3 Axial Position, cm
U R D U E
60 40 20 0 30 20 10 0 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
x = 2 cm
x = 1 cm
Radial Position, cm
CONCLUSIONS ( I )
P
1. LDV measurements show a high level of fluctuations of velocities. The entrainment velocity field does not respond to the periodic pulsation of the pool fire. Different Choices of entrainment interface lead to qualitative as well as quantitative differences in entrainment rates. 2. PIV can be used to observe the instantaneous flow structure of the entrainment velocity field; The flow pattern becomes more irregular with increasing fire size. 3. The mean entrainment velocity fields show that a floor changes the entrainment flow pattern and makes the entrainment velocities more horizontal.
U R D U E
CONCLUSIONS ( II )
P
4. Satisfactory nondimensional air entrainment correlations can be obtained for different groups of fires. However, a universal entrainment correlation is not available. 5. Experimental estimate of thermal expansion source term in fires is feasible based on measurement of mixture fraction distributions. 6. With measured potential velocity source term and vorticity distribution, predictions of entrainment rate using Baum s fire induced flow field formulation agree reasonably well with measurements. 7. Application of this methodology for boundary condition specification in time dependent calculations such as LES and evaluation of the results would be interesting
Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories School of Mechanical Engineering
U R D U E