Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Subtitle TRADITIONALISTS
vs. PROGRESSIVISTS
A general overall plan of the content that the school should offer the student by way of qualifying him for graduation or certification or for entrance into a professional or vocational field Good$%&'()%*&
C!##i$!l!% definition"
n.
n.
+u!!i"ulu, is a dyna,i"$ eve!"han.in. se!ies o /lanned lea!nin. e0/e!ien"es. +u!!i"ulu, is eve!ythin. lea!ne!s e0/e!ien"e in s"hool
Definition" of CURRICULUM
u +u!!i"ulu,
is a "ultu!al !e/!odu"tion in a st!u"tu!ed 1ay. It is even ,o!e) It should also value inde/endent thinkin. in the "onte0t o the 1idest sense o so"ial !es/onsibility . - S,ith$ Stanley 2 Sho!es
Tanne! 2 Tanne! 3455')%4%6 o e!s the ollo1in. de inition$ de!ived !o, De1ey7s de inition o edu"ation8
That reconstruction of knowledge and experience that enables the learner to grow in exercising intelligent control of subsequent knowledge and experience
De1ey vie1ed edu"ation as a generative /!o"ess 9 that is$ a /!o"ess th!ou.h 1hi"h the lea!ne! e0tends and dee/ens the "a/ability o e0e!"isin. intelli.ent "ont!ol ove! "han.in. "onditions in li e
TEACHIN+ STA,,
uA"ade,i"
Mana*e%ent Co%%ittee
uE0e"utive
I-EC
uThe
ADMINISTRATION
u <uality
ad,inist!ation) +u!!i"ulu, in o!,ation Re.ist!ation Rules Tests and E0a, !esults Evaluation o!,s
is .ene!ally !e.a!ded as an ob?e"tive$ i,/e!sonal$ ,any ti,es value- !ee "o,,odity to be .!as/ed. u Out"o,es a!e ve!y s/e"i i". u Le"tu!e!s a!e the te"hni"ians 1hose task is solely to ollo1 the ste/-by-ste/ inst!u"tions in thei! ,anuals
on relevant "u!!i"ulu,
"ontent. u The /!o.!essivists see kno1led.e as ,o!e than a /!odu"t that has to be ,aste!ed. u Students$ they believe ,ust inte!a"t 1ith the 1o!ld a!ound the, and inte!/!et it.
should be the ove!all ai,s o edu"ation# u @o1 "an edu"ation hel/ hu,anity a"hieve a ?ust and "o,/assionate so"iety# u What is the !i.ht 3,o!al6 thin. to do#
one has all the t!uth u @u,an natu!e and hu,an lea!nin. a!e "o,/le0 u +u!!i"ulu, do"u,ents a!e only .uides. Tea"he!s use thei! /!o essional and "onside!ed ?ud.e,ent in dete!,inin. 1hat is best o! a /a!ti"ula! situation
o//oses Abankin. edu"ationB and Ana!!ation si"knessB by 1hi"h tea"he!s de/osit in o!,ation into the /assive ,inds o thei! /u/ils. u Lea!ne!s should not only be a"tive /a!ti"i/ants$ but in doin. so should develo/ a "!iti"al "ons"iousness.
RE,LECTION
What kind o "u!!i"ulu, o!ientation Subtitle !e/!esents you! Theolo.i"al Institution# What kind o "u!!i"ulu, o!ientation do you think you! Theolo.i"al Institution should ollo1# @o1#
A "tan$e in fa.o!# of a
uI
a "u!!i"ulu, tea, sha!es "o,,on belie s and values$ a /!o.!essive o!ientation 1ith its e,/hasi>e on unde!standin. and ,eanin. and "!iti"al thinkin. linked to li e situations$ it 1ill yield a ,o!e thou.ht ul a//!oa"h to "u!!i"ulu, /lannin. than all the othe! o!ientations.
P#o*#e""i.e a((#oa$/