Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
321LabReqS01.doc
N. Randy Rainwater
Page 1
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Laboratory Schedule General Instructions for Lab Work and Report Writing Laboratory Testing Measuring Stress and Strain Tensile, Impact, Torsion Testing of Metal Hardness Testing of Metal Aggregate Grain Size Distribution and Unit Weight Aggregate Specific Gravity and Absorption Mix and Test Fresh Concrete Capping Concrete Cylinders Nondestructive Testing of Concrete Concrete Strength Asphalt Binder Testing Asphalt Mix Testing 1 and 2 Compression and Bending Tests of Wood Appendix A - Data Sheets Stress Strain Tensile Impact Hardness Grain Size Analysis Bulk Density of Coarse Aggregate Aggregate Specific Gravity and Absorption Mixing and Testing Fresh Concrete Resonant Frequency and Pulse Velocity Rebound Number and Penetration Resistance Compressive Strength Flexural Strength Traditional Asphalt Binder Testing Superpave Binder Testing Asphalt Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity Asphalt Bulk Specific Gravity (Marshall), Flow and Stability Asphalt Bulk Specific Gravity (Gyratory), Ignition Oven, % Voids Gyratory Compaction Wood Compression Wood Bending Appendix B - Concrete Mixing and Testing Notes 3 4
8 9 10 11 13 14 14 15 16 17 18, 19 20
22 23, 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37, 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 47
N. Randy Rainwater
Page 2
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
1-7
1-14
1-21 1-28 2-4 2-11 2-18 2-25 3-4 3-11 3-18 3-25
NO LABS Send an email message to nrainwat@utk.edu indicating your lab session (this is an assignment!) Introduction to laboratory, Measuring Stresses and Strains (Rm 10 Perkins Hall) Compression and Bending of Wood Metals Testing: tensile, impact (room 10, Perkins Hall) Field Trip to Fabricator Aggregate Grain Size Distribution, Unit Weight, Wash 200 Aggregate Specific Gravity and Absorption Field Trip to Aggregate Quarry Concrete Mix and Field Testing (dress for the occasion) Concrete Plant Field Trip Spring Break Cap cylinders, Demonstration of Windsor Probe and Schmidt Impact Hammer (NDT) Concrete Strength Test (28 day) Asphalt Mix Testing: Theoretical max. s.g., Marshall compaction, Gyratory compaction Marshall Flow and stability, Bulk s.g., Ignition oven No Lab Work on Comprehensive Report (10% of Final Class Exam-not averaged with laboratory report grades) No Lab
1 (2/4)
29 2-4
6 7, 8
9 - 13
4-1
6 (4/8) -
5 (4/8) 6
15, 16 24, 25
4-8 4-15
26, 27
4-22
Send an email message to nrainwat@utk.edu indicating your lab session (this is an assignment!)
N. Randy Rainwater
Page 3
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
N. Randy Rainwater
Page 4
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Details of each of these items are given the following descriptions. 1. Cover or Transmittal Letter (limit one to one and one half pages) The first page of the report should be a Cover or Transmittal letter. The Letter should indicate the following: a) b) c) Date Submitted (date actually submitted, not the due date) The name, address, and logo of your "engineering firm" or team name The name and address of the organization for whom the work was performed. Example: N. Randy Rainwater 223 Perkins Hall The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996-2010 Subject The subject section should be indicated with a heading and include the project scenario as shown in the example below: SUBJECT: Index Properties and Classification of Soil proposed for the soil subgrade of the UT entrance bridge approaches e) f) Purpose An introductory statement in the Transmittal Letter should state the purpose clearly, concisely, and accurately. Abstract or Summary of Data and Conclusions: Practices vary among engineering firms on what to include in the cover letter of a report. Some use only a short and sweet letter referring the client to the attached report for results and conclusions. Others include a brief summary of results and a concise statement of conclusions in the cover letter. For the laboratory reports, use cover letters that include a summary of results and conclusions. The Transmittal Letter should include an abstract or short summary of your findings. It should be self-contained, and "should state the summary objectives and scope of the (report) . . describe techniques or approaches only to the degree necessary for comprehension, and describe findings and conclusions as concisely and informatively as possible" (TRB 1983). Tables should be used whenever practical for presenting end results. Table of Contents The Table of Contents is used to facilitate the grading of the reports, and will be used to record the points awarded for each category. The table of contents should include page numbers and the report pages should include computer generated page numbers. Results The Results section will contain those facts or answers, that you obtained in your experiment , either from direct measurements or calculations based on measurements. To distinguish between results and conclusions, remember that the latter are reasoned judgments and the former are facts. Your end results should be summarized in a table, and supported by appropriate figures. The data should be reported in a concise and efficient manner that effectively communicates to the client. Calculation data like bowl numbers and bowl weights should not be included in the body of the report. Such data may be included with raw data forms in the appendix. Each table and figure should have a title. Columns (and rows, if necessary) of tables will have headings clearly indicating what you are tabulating. Figures should be centered on pages and oriented so that they can easily be viewed when the report is bound. Both axes should have headings. Divisions on the axes should be chosen so as to facilitate accurate plotting of the results. Data points should be clearly shown by using a dot, circle, square, etc., and should not be obscured by the line connecting the data points. If more than one curve is plotted per figure, make sure the reader
d)
2.
3.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page 5
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
can differentiate and identify the curves. Use a solid line to connect data points and a broken line for parts of the curve beyond your range of data. Avoid dark backgrounds and light colored lines. A professional report is often copied; keep that in consideration when designing the graphics. 4. Discussions of Results In this section the writer provides the foundation upon which his/her conclusions will rest. The acceptance or rejection of the conclusions by the reader will depend largely on the discussion of results. Under this heading the writer will comment upon the validity of the results and make comparisons with typical values for the measured parameters. Remember "the acceptance or rejection of the conclusions drawn in the report is directly related to the skill of the reporter in providing an accurate and convincing discussion of the reasoning upon which the conclusions are based" (Leonards 1955). Conclusions and Recommendations Apply the conclusions and recommendations to the fictitious project scenario unless instructed to do otherwise. "A conclusion is reasoned judgment based on facts. For example, a laboratory investigation may be carried out to determine the feasibility of using a certain sand deposit (from the standpoint of proper grain-size distribution) as fine aggregate for a concrete mix. The grain-size distributions of a number of samples are determined and the percentages of the various size groups reported either in tabular form or as continuous curves. These curves are the "Results" of the experiment, but before conclusion can be drawn the results must be compared with other known facts regarding the acceptable limits of the grain-size distributions; only then can a reasoned judgment be made regarding the feasibility of using the sand deposit for the stated purpose. These facts are stated and comparisons were made under the heading "Discussion of Results." It may then be concluded that the sand deposit in question is not suitable because of a deficiency in a certain size group. Perhaps the reporter wishes to recommend mixing this sand with another in order to make up the deficiency, in which case a separate heading for "Recommendations" could be used, or the statement could be included with the conclusions under the title "Conclusions and Recommendations." (Leonards 1955). 6. Appendix The Procedure section tells the reader how your experiment was performed in sufficient detail for another person to run the experiment. You will be using a lab manual which has a procedure for you to follow for each experiment. It will be sufficient to reference this procedure and to denote any departures you took from the referenced procedures. The complete procedure need not be reported, provided the laboratory manual is properly referenced. You must, however, state the deviations and departures from the manual. Include the designation and title of any ASTM or other standards the experiment was based on. Include a list of all references used, including any software (excluding word processing or spreadsheets). Include consultation with the Laboratory Consultant, Instructor, or Professor. Make sure each reference is complete. The reference section of this document should be used as a guide. If the reference is to certain page numbers, include this information. If you referred to a lab report prepared in a previous term by another student, this should be referenced as well. Reference to a previous lab report is acceptable, however plagiarism and other inappropriate uses of these old reports will be considered a violation of the Honor Statement as printed on the class syllabus. Include the raw data recorded on the forms during the lab test. Do not erase errors. Line them out. It is neither necessary nor desirable to copy data on to clean data sheets for the sake of neatness, since the important results have been provided in the Results section.
5.
Procedure
References
Data Forms
N. Randy Rainwater
Page 6
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Final Comprehensive Report This final comprehensive report represents $50,000 in materials testing services you were contracted to perform for your client. The report is not purely a cut and past report. Previous reports are to be considered as though they were preliminary reports and the end results and final conclusions are now being incorporated into a final report for your client. The report should demonstrate that you know what you are talking about; communicate clearly and efficiently; and make conclusions and recommendations applied to your project scenario. It should look like a professional engineering report, not a homework assignment! Remember that you are not just giving answers to questions. You may give all the right numbers and say the right things but if the numbers are scattered through the report and your discussion does not follow a good format, you will not receive a good grade. You may follow the format for Formal Laboratory Reports. Original raw data sheets may be omitted from this report. AVAILABLE RESOURCES A student computer and printer is located in laboratory Instructor's office. The CE 321 lab data web page and links at http://web.utk.edu/~rainwter/ce321labdata.htm ASTM standards are located in the lab and in the library. REFERENCES 1. Leonards, G.A., Notes on Report Writing, Third Edition, Purdue University, 1955. 2. Mamlouk, M.S. and Zaniewski, J.P. (1999) Material for Civil and Construction Engineers, Addison-Wesley, Reading Massachusetts, 388 pp. 3. Turabian, K.L. (1996) A Manual for writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations , University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 308 pp.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
METALS TESTING TENSILE TESTING OF DUCTILE AND BRITTLE MATERIALS, IMPACT TESTING, TORSION TESTING
ASTM A370, Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products. Vol. 01.04 ASTM E8, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. Vol. 03.01 ASTM E23, Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials. Vol. 03.01 ASTM E143, Standard Test Method for Shear Modulus at Room Temperature. Vol. 03.01
PROJECT APPLICATION The construction drawings and specifications call for A36 structural steel to be used in the cover over the walkway around the arch. The contractor wishes to substitute 1018CF beams of the same size for the walkway cover support. The contractor (and fabricator trying to sell the stuff), claim that the stress strain characteristics of 1018CF are very similar to A36 and would be an acceptable substitute in this application. Your firm has been contracted to compare the stress strain and strength characteristics of the two steels. LAB (meet in room 10, Perkins Hall) Tensile Testing (Exp. No. 2): Each laboratory class will test a 1018, A36, and cast iron specimen. Determine the dimensions and shape of each specimen and record in the space provided on the data sheet. An extensometer will be used to measure elongation. Impact Testing (Exp. No. 4): The Charpy Impact Test will be conducted on specimens of varying carbon content and formation processes. Each lab session will perform the test at a different temperature and share the data with the other labs. Torsion Testing (Exp. No. 3): If conducted, only one specimen will be tested. REPORT Tensile Testing - as instructed in the laboratory manual -dimensions, identification, etc. Impact Testing -as instructed in the laboratory manual (omit ductile to brittle transition temperature and lateral expansion) Torsion Testing (if performed) -as instructed in the laboratory manual
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
LAB Hardness Testing (ASTM E10, E18): Using the Brinell and Rockwell hardness machines, determine the hardness of various ferrous and non-ferrous metals as assigned by the instructor. Be sure to note all information concerning carbon content, working method, heat treatment, etc. which may have an effect on the results of your tests. For the harder metals (iron and steel) use a 3000 KG Brinell Loading, and for the softer metals use a 500 Kg Brinell loading. If the Brinell hardness is above 220, use the Rockwell C test; use the Rockwell B test for all other samples. Be sure to note the Rockwell letter B or C with each hardness measured by the Rockwell method. REPORT -Determine the Brinell Hardness Number (BHN) for each measured value
BHN =
D D D2 d 2 2
where; P = the applied load (3000 Kg or 500 kg) D = diameter of the indentor (10mm) d = diameter of the indentation, mm -Determine the average BHN and/or RHN for each sample tested.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
10
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
PROJECT APPLICATION The aggregates are being tested to determine if they are acceptable concrete aggregates and to determine the concrete mix design. LAB As with any engineering material, certain aggregate properties must be determined prior to the utilization of the aggregate. While our time will not allow the determination of all these properties, we will be making certain measurements that will allow you to compute some of the most important aggregate properties. In this lab we will be measuring the grain size distribution of both coarse and fine aggregate samples and the unit weight of the coarse aggregate. Before you leave the lab, you will be responsible for obtaining measurements pertaining to both the coarse and the fine aggregate. You will also be responsible for preparing samples of fine and coarse aggregate for next week's absorption lab Sieve Analysis (Exp. No. 6): Each sieve is to be weighed before and after the sieving process. The difference in the before and after weights will be recorded as the weight retained on each sieve. After completing the weighing process, be sure to clean each sieve as instructed. Make sure the lab is clean and all equipment has been put away before leaving the lab. Dispose of the sieved aggregate outside or as instructed during the lab. Unit Weight (ASTM C29) 1. Calibrate the measure (should be done yearly or when there is reason to question the accuracy of the previous calibration) weigh the measure and cover apply Vaseline around the top edge of the measure fill the measure with water at room temperature and cover with plate glass to eliminate bubbles and excess water. weigh the measure filled with water (include cover) measure the temperature of the water and determine the density calculate the volume (Mass of Water/Density) 2. Obtain a representative sample and reduce to sample size by quartering (C702). 3. Fill the measure 1/3 full and level with the fingers. 4. Rod the layer with 25 strokes of the tamping rod evenly distributed over the surface. 5. Fill the measure to 2/3 full and rod 25 times without penetrating the previous layer. 6. Fill the measure to overflowing and rod 25 times. Level the surface with fingers or the rod such that any slight projections of larger pieces of aggregate approximately balance the larger voids in the surface below the top of the measure. 7. Determine the mass to the nearest 0.1 lb (0.05 kg). 8. Calculate the bulk density. 9. Return the aggregate to the coarse aggregate bin. Wash 200 of Fine Aggregate (ASTM C117, AASHTO T11) 1. The test procedure requires that the material be oven dried to constant mass before testing. However, air dried material that has been stored inside will be used for practical reasons. This may introduce a very small error that is negligible for purposes of this lab exercise.
N. Randy Rainwater Page
11
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
2. 3.
4. 5. 6. 7.
Obtain a minimum sample size of 300g using the splitting procedure (C702). Place the sample in a deep container and add sufficient water to cover the sample. Agitate the sample to separate all particles finer than 75 [m from the coarser particles and to bring the fine material into suspension. Stirring with a metal spoon is an acceptable method of agitation. Immediately pour the wash water containing the suspended solids over two stacked sieves (No. 16 and No. 200). Add a second charge of water to the container, agitate, and pour into the stacked sieves. Make sure all material is removed from the container. Carefully pour or spray water through the sieves until the wash water is clear. Rinse all the material retained on the sieves into a drying bowl. Oven dry the material to constant mass (18 to 24 hrs.) and determine the mass retained to the nearest 0.1% of the original mass of the sample. Each lab group must assign someone to return to the lab and weigh the oven dried material and communicate that data to the rest of the group. Record the information on the oven log sheet.
Absorption of Coarse and Fine Aggregate (Exp. No. 7, 8): Prepare samples for this test which will be performed during the next lab. Obtain a representative sample of fine aggregate and reduce by splitting into a sample of approximately 1 kg. Place the sample into a container for submerging in water. Recording the mass is not important at this point. Obtain a representative sample of coarse aggregate and reduce by quartering into a sample of approximately 4 kg. Wash the sample on a #4 sieve screen. Place the sample into a container for submerging in water. Recording the mass is not important at this point. REPORT: As instructed in the laboratory manual . For the distribution plots, make the following charts. Chart 1: Semi-log plot of grain size distribution of fine aggregate and the ASTM C33 limits for fine aggregate (Table 5.4 in Mamlouk) Chart 2: Semi-log plot of grain size distribution of coarse aggregate and the ASTM C33 limits for #57 aggregate (Table 5.5 in Mamlouk) Chart 3: 0.45 power plot of grain size distribution of the coarse aggregate. The percent of fine aggregate smaller than 75 [m (compare to standard of ASTM C33, Table 1). The unit weight of the coarse aggregate.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
12
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
LAB (Exp. No. 7, 8) This laboratory exercise is an extension of the sieve analysis lab from last week. The properties you will be measuring must be known before any mix design calculations can be made. The properties of interest are specific gravity and absorption of both the coarse and fine aggregate fractions. The instructor will split the section into groups. Each group will be responsible for measurements pertaining to the properties of both coarse aggregate and fine aggregate. Make all measurements as instructed and record the data on the data sheet provided. It is the lab groups responsibility to designate someone to return in 12 to 24 hours to weigh the oven dried material and communicate this value to the other students. Be sure you record the correct bowl number and measure the bowl weight and weigh the correct bowl after drying. Record the appropriate information on the oven log sheet on the front of the oven. REPORT As instructed in the laboratory manual. Include the following two charts of a combined aggregate gradation (34% fine aggregate and 66% coarse aggregate). Chart 1: Semi-log gradation plot of the combined aggregate. Show the combined gradation limits (ASTM C33) of fine and coarse aggregate on the same chart. Chart 2: 0.45 power plot of the combined gradation (limits are not required on this plot).
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
13
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
PROJECT APPLICATION Each lab will test a different mix design to determine it's suitability for the construction project foundation which requires a 2 to 4 in. slump, 4% air content, and 4000 psi compressive strength (28 day). LAB (Exp. No. 9 13) In this laboratory concrete will be mixed according to the mix proportions determined from the aggregate tests. The concrete will be mixed, sampled and tested according to the methods listed below. You should become familiar with these field test methods and the specifications for the required equipment. Notes on the testing method procedures are located in the appendix. Collect all data and make all calculations necessary to complete the data sheets. You must return 24 hr. (+/- 8 hr.) after molding the specimens to remove the molds, identify your sample, and place it in the humid room or curing tank. REPORT The temperature of the concrete mix As instructed in the laboratory manual for Experiments No. 9 11, 13. You may include all the information in a single table you do not need four separate tables for the four different tests.
LAB (Exp. No. 14) Students will apply capping compound to the test cylinders. Nondestructive testing of concrete will be demonstrated.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
14
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
LAB The evaluation of the condition of structures without destroying their usefulness must be accomplished by test(s) that are nondestructive. This applies to materials other than Portland cement concrete (PCC); but PCC is the material that will be used to illustrate some of the types of nondestructive tests available. This laboratory exercise investigates certain PCC properties using the following nondestructive tests: Schmidt Impact Hammer or Rebound Number (Exp. No. 17): This device may be used to determine the approximate compressive strength of PCC. Test the concrete as you are directed by the lab instructor and determine the average compressive strength converted from the values you measure with the device. Resonant Frequency Tests (ASTM C215): Determine the resonant frequency in all three modes of vibration as indicated by the instructor. Convert these frequency readings to Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity or Dynamic Modulus of Rigidity using the relationships provided on the lab data sheet. Pulse Velocity Testing (ASTM C597): Determine velocity of sound through the concrete sample as directed by the lab instructor. Convert the calculated pulse velocity to Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity using the relationship provided on the lab data sheet. Penetration Resistance (Exp. No. 18): Using the Windsor Probe, determine the resistance to penetration of hardened concrete and estimate the compressive strength using available correlations. REPORT As instructed by the laboratory instructor.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
15
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
LAB Compression Testing (Exp. No. 15) : Cylinders will be tested according to the procedure in the laboratory manual. An extensometer will be attached to measure deformation. Record load and deformation at a maximum of 10,000 lb. intervals. Continue loading at the prescribed rate until failure. Make sketches of the failed cylinders and note the types of failure. The compressive strength will be determined from the average of two tests. Flexural Strength Testing (Exp. No. 16): Fill in the required information on the data sheet. Conduct the test as outlined in the laboratory manual. Make sketches of the beams after failure to indicate the location of the fracture. REPORT Compression Test As instructed in the laboratory manual. Be sure to note the age of any specimen tested when giving the strength. Compare the measured strength with the design strength. Plot the stress-strain diagram for one of the samples tested. For the same sample, calculate the chord modulus to the nearest 50000 psi using the following equation (ASTM C469) E = (S2 - S1)/(, 2 - 0.000050) S2 = stress at 40% of ultimate load S1 = stress at 50 * 10-6 strain , 2 = strain at S2 Calculate the modulus of elasticity using the method recommended by ACI Building Code (Eq 7.3b, p191):
Ec = 57000 fc '
Report the mix design, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture for the other two labs. Report values in a summary table. Flexural Test As instructed by the laboratory manual. Plot load vs. deflection.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
16
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
LAB This laboratory will involve the measurement of certain properties of asphalt binder materials using traditional and superpave methods. Be sure you identify the asphalt provided by the instructor and obtain all information necessary to complete the data sheet. Assist the laboratory instructor in clean up of equipment. Traditional Binder Testing Methods Penetration (Exp. No. 22) Absolute Viscosity using vacuum capillary viscometer (Exp. No. 23) Superpave Binder Testing Methods Dynamic Shear Rheometer Test (DSR) (Exp. No. 21) Viscosity by rotational viscometer (Exp. No. 20) One or more of the following Superpave Binder Tests may also be performed Bending Beam Rheometer Test (BBR) (AASHTO TP1, ASTM P245) Rolling Thin Film Oven Test (RTFO) (AASHTO T240, ASTM D2872) Pressure Aging Vessel (PAV) (AASHTO PP1) REPORT As instructed in the laboratory manual. G*/sin * As instructed during the laboratory for the additional tests that may be performed. Be sure to compare your results with recommended standards for the asphalt binder tested.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
17
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
MIX TESTING 1 THEORITICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY, COMPACTING MARSHALL FLOW TEST SPECIMENS, SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTER
ASTM D979, Standard Practice for Sampling Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM D2041, Standard Test Method for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM D1559, Standard Test Method for Resistance to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus (only in 1997 and earlier volumes) All the above standards are in Volume04.03. AASHTO TP4, Method for Preparing and Determining the Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Specimens by Means of the SHRP Gyratory Compactor
PROJECT APPLICATION The asphalt mix being tested is being considered for the pavement in the parking lot at the archway visitors center. The asphalt must meet TN DOT 307B requirements. This standard is approximately equal to the "Heavy" design criteria in Table 9.11 of the Mamlouk textbook with a minimum VMA of 11.5%. You must also determine, from the gyratory test, if the mix meets the Superpave requirements of Nini, Ndes , and Nmax. LAB Mix asphaltic concrete as instructed and record the mass of asphalt and aggregate on the data sheet. In lieu of mixing asphaltic concrete, tests may be run on samples provided by TN DOT. Theoretical maximum specific gravity (Rice specific gravity, ASTM D2041) and separating samples for the Marshall and Gyratory Compaction 1. Asphalt will be heated just enough to pour on a table and spread out. 2. Pour a bucket onto a covered table, spread the material some, and quarter the sample. 3. Obtain samples of approximately 1200g to 1250 g. Place them in a bowl and place back in the oven to be used for Marshall pills. Recording the exact mass is not important at this point. After taking opposite quarters the sample should be mixed and quartered again. Leave approximately 1000g to 1500 g. on the table. 4. Spread the remaining material out to cool. When it has cooled just enough to touch, separate the mix by hand into portions < or = 1/4". 5. Obtain the mass in air. 6. Cover the mix with water and place under vacuum for 15 minutes. 7. Submerge the sample in the specific gravity tank for 10 minutes and weigh. The water should be 25 C +/- 1. Be sure to account for the weight of the container in air and in water. 8. A second bucket will be used for the gyratory specimens. Use the same quartering process to obtain samples of 4700g to 4800g. Do not do a theoretical maximum specific gravity with the second bucket. Resistance to plastic flow Marshall test (Exp. No. 25): specimens will be prepared using 75 blows each side during this lab. The specimens will be tested during the next lab. Gyratory Compactor Demonstration (Exp. No. 24) REPORT The theoretical maximum specific gravity to the third decimal, type of mix, and mass of sample. As instructed in the laboratory manual for the Experiments 24 and 25
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
18
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
MIX TESTING 2 BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY, MARSHALL STABILITY AND FLOW OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, IGNITION OVEN TEST
ASTM D1559, Standard Test Method for Resistance to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus (only in 1997 and earlier volumes) ASTM D979, Standard Practice for Sampling Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM D2726, Standard Test Method for Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Non-absorptive Compacted Bituminous Mixtures ASTM D3203, Standard Test Method for Percent Air Voids in Compacted Dense and Open Bituminous Paving Mixtures All the above standards are in Volume 04.03. AASHTO TP53, Ignition Oven Test
LAB Bulk specific gravity and density (Exp. No. 26) Plastic flow using Marshall apparatus (Exp. No. 27) Ignition oven asphalt content test (AASHTO TP53), will be conducted the asphalt binder content of the mix. The Marshall specimens will be used for the test. The remaining aggregate can be used for sieve analysis REPORT As instructed in the laboratory manual Report the percentage of asphalt binder content as determined by the ignition oven test. Report the percent air voids in the total mix (VTM), voids in the aggregate (VMA), and voids filled with asphalt (VFA).
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
19
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
PROJECT APPLICATION Archway Incorporated constructed a temporary shelter under the archway construction site to protect construction workers. The shelter collapsed under about two inches of snow. Fortunately, no one was injured but it has caused a delay in the project and created doubt in the minds of the University administration concerning the contractors competence. Archway investigated the wood used in the structure and found that it was a hybrid Douglas Fir from California. The contractor alleges that the hybrid wood has a much lower Modulus of Elasticity than typical construction wood and is considering placing a claim against the lumber company and wishes to restore the University's confidence in their expertise. Your firm has been contracted to perform standard wood testing on samples of the Douglas Fir to determine if it has strength characteristics typical of wood construction materials. LAB (Exp. No. 29) Compression parallel to the grain: Using a 2x2x8-in. block and a strain measuring apparatus record the load and deflection every 2000 lbs. At the first signs of failure (cracking, etc.), remove the strain device and continue loading until the ultimate load is reached. Record this ultimate load along with your best estimate of the total deformation. Note the type of failure. Compression perpendicular to the grain: Using a 2x2x6-in. block record the load and deflection every 200 lbs. This test may be performed using the MTS equipment and computer data acquisition. Bending test (flexure): With the side nearest the heart of the tree on the bottom, place the sample in position to be tested in center point beam loading with a span of 28-in. Record the load and deflection every 100 lbs. Note the type of failure. REPORT As instructed in the laboratory manual for each of the three tests.
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
20
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
21
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
P/2
Calculations: Stress = Modulus of Elasticity * Strain (Experimental Data) Stress = My/I (Theoretical Stress) Date __________
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
22
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Material
Diameter
Gauge Lth
Diameter
Gauge Lth
Deformation ( )
Deformation ( )
ASTM A370, E8
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
23
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Material
Diameter
Gauge Lth
Diameter
Gauge Lth
Deformation ( )
Deformation ( )
ASTM A370, E8
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
24
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
TORSION TEST
Material Length, in. Gage Lth., in. Diameter, in. Troptometer length, in.
TROPTO.in # of Rev.
TROPTO.in- # of Rev
Date _______________
Name ______________________________
ASTM E 143
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
25
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Material Tested
Temperature of Specimen
ASTM E23
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
26
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Date______________________
Name_________________________
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
27
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
COARSE AGGREGATE
Sieve Size Sieve Weight Sieve and aggr. Weight Weight Retained Percent Retained Cumulative % Retained Percent Passing Diameter (mm.)
2.0" 1.5" 1.0" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" No. 4 No. 8 No. 16 PAN TOTAL FINE AGGREGATE
Sieve Size Sieve Weight Sieve and aggr. Weight Weight Retained Percent Retained Cumulative % Retained Percent Passing
Diameter (mm.)
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
28
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
29
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Pan/bowl #___________ , Mass Mass of pan and SSD sample Saturated Surface Dry mass of Sample, gm (B) Mass of container in water Mass of container and sample in water Mass of sample in Water, gm (C) Loss of mass in Water, grams (B-C)
Oven Drying
Bowl Number Bowl mass empty Mass of bowl and aggregate Oven Dry mass of sample, gm (A)
BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY = A/(B-C) BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY (SSD) = B/(B-C) APPARENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY = A/(A-C) ABSORPTION, % = ((B-A)/A) x100 FINE AGGREGATE
Flask No. ________ Oven Dry Bowl No.________ , Mass (A) Oven dry mass of sample, grams (B) Weight of flask + water, grams (provided by lab instructor) Water temperature, Degrees F. (C) Mass of flask + water + sample, grams (S) Mass of Saturated Surface Dry specimen (500 +/-10g)
BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY = A/(B + S C) BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY, SSD = S/(B + S C) APPARENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY = A/(B + A C) ABSORPTION, % = ((S A)/A) x100
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
30
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Weight of measure filled with concrete: Weight of measure: Net weight of concrete: Volume of measure:
UNIT WEIGHT OF CONCRETE , Lbs/ft3 (W): YEILD, Y (ft3)=W 1/W: Y(yd3)=W1/27W: RELATIVE YIELD, Ry=Y/Yd: Use consistent units!!!!!
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
31
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
RESONANT FREQUENCY AND PULSE VELOCITY TESTING OF HARDENED CONCRETE (NDT TESTING)
1.) Resonant Frequency Data: Height(t)_______ ________ Hz. ________ Hz. ________ Hz. __________ sec. __________ sec. __________ sec.
Sample size: Mass _______ Length(L)_______ Width(b)_______ (n) Transverse Frequency (n) Longitudinal Freq. (n) Torsional Frequency 2.) Pulse Velocity Data: Total Travel Time Initial Time (D) Travel Time through Sample
CALCULATION EQUATIONS: From ASTM C215 & C597 (values in SI units are the standard) (A) Dynamic Youngs Modulus of Elasticity (E) in (N/m2) Dynamic E = CMn2 M = mass of specimen, kg C = 1.6067 (L3T/bt3), N-s2(kg-m2) for a prism L = length of specimen, m b, t = dimensions of cross section of specimen, m t is the direction the resonant frequency is driven T = a correction factor that depends on the dimensions of the specimen, C215 gives method of determining, use 1.2. Dynamic E = DM(n)2 D = 4(L/bt), N-s2/(kg-m2) for a prism (B) Dynamic Modulus of Rigidity (G) in (N/m2) Dynamic G = BM(n)2 B = 4(LR/A), N-s2/(kg-m2) R = a shape factor, (a/b + b/a)/[4a/b - 2.52(a/b)2 + 0.2(a/b) 6], a and b are cross sectional dimensions in inches with a < b A = cross sectional area of test specimen, m2 (C) V = Length of Sample/Travel Time through Sample, m/s Dynamic E = V2(0.849) = conc. density, kg/m3 (Note: 0.849 factor assumes Poissons Ratio = 0.24). ASTM: C 215, C 597, C 803, C 805, C 918
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
32
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Trial 3
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
33
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Load 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K 60K 70K 80K 90K 100K
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
34
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Width, inches ___________ Depth, inches ___________ Design Strength, psi ___________
Date ______________
Name _______________________
ASTM: C78
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
35
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Viscometer No. Bulb Used Time, sec. (t) Calib. Factor (C) Viscosity (poises) = Ct
IV. Specific Gravity:
Wt. Of pycnometer + stopper, gm Wt. Of pycn., stopper + water, gm Wt. of pycn., stopper, + asph, gm Wt. pycn., stopper, asph, water, gm SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
(C A) / ((B A) (D C))
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
36
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
% torque
1 2 3
Average
--------------------------
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
37
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
SUPERPAVE BINDER TESTS 2 FLEXURAL CREEP STIFFNESS USING BENDING BEAM RHOMETER
Binder Grade: _________________ Beam width: __________________ Time, s Date: _________________ Thickness: _____________ Load, mN Time: _______________ Span Length: 102 mm
Deflection, mm
Temperature, C
8 15 30 60 120 240
Measured Stiffness S(t) = PL3/4bh3 (t) S(t) = time-dependent flexural creep stiffness, MPa P = constant load, N L = Span length, mm b = width of beam, mm h = thickness of beam, mm (t) = deflection of beam, mm AASHTO TP1
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
38
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Mass of sample in water at 25EC (C) C=B-D Gmm=Theor. Max. Sp. Gravity = A/(A-C)
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
39
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Sample Identification: _______________________________________________________ Asphalt Cement S. G. ____________ Specimen 1: Specimen 2: Specimen 3: Diameter ________________ Diameter ________________ Diameter ________________ Aggregate S. G. ______________ Height _____________________ Height _____________________ Height _____________________ Spec. 1 BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY (Marshall specimens) Dry mass in air (A) Mass in water (C) SSD mass in air (B) Gmb = Bulk Sp. Gr. = A/(B-C) Temperature of water Correction factor, K (1 at 25BC) Bulk Sp. Gr. = Gmb * K MARSHALL STABILITY Dial Reading Prov. Ring Factor Sample Size Factor Marshall Stability, lbs Marshall Flow Value: 1/100 inches ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ Spec. 2 ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ Spec. 3 ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
40
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
______
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
41
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
GYRATORY COMPACTION Specimen Diameter_________________ Pressure ____________________ Gyrations Height, mm Gyrations Height, mm
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
42
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Perpend. to Grain:
________ ________
PARALLEL TO GRAIN
LOAD (lbs) Dial Reading ( ) Deformation (in)
PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN
LOAD (lbs) Dial Reading ( ) Deformation (in)
ASTM D 198
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
43
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
Sample Dimensions: Length _______ Width _______ Height _______ Span _______ Weight of Beam: _________ Density of Beam _________ lb / ft3
LOAD (lbs)
DIAL READING ( )
DEFLECTION (in.)
ASTM D 198
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
44
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
45
12/20/00
321LabReqS01.doc
C143 Slump Mold: 4" to 8" diameter, x 12" high rod: 5/8" x 24" with 5/8" radius rounded end 2.5 minutes
N. Randy Rainwater
Page
46
12/20/00
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Dampen mold and equipment Perform on flat, clean, nonabsorbent, rigid surface Place in mold in 1/3 layers at 2 5/8" and 6 1/8" heights Rod 25 times just into layer beneath Keep excess at top during rodding last layer Strike off at top with tamping rod Remove cone in 3 - 7 sec Measure slump to displaced original center of top (if falling or shearing do over) Report to nearest 1/4" Complete entire test from filling to removal in 2.5 minutes
C138 Unit wt, Yield, Air content Unit Wt Use measure used for coarse aggregate unit wt ( cf), or the measure used with the Air Pressure meter (1/4 cf) if nominal maximum size aggregate is 1" or less Normally compact by rodding but require different method for slump <1" compact in 3 layers, 25 strokes each layer, penetrate lower layer about 1" (for cf measure) Tap smartly 10 to 15 times each layer about 1/8" excess over top of measure, then strike off with rigid plate Yield Yield: Y = W1/W W1 = total wt of all materials batched W = unit wt of concrete Relative Yield: Ry = Y/Yd Yd = Volume of concrete which batch was designed to produce Air Content -Pressure Method (C231) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Place in container in 3 equal layers with the 25 rodding and 12 - 15 smart tapping routine. Strike of with straight edge Place top and seal Open both petcocks (make sure air valve is closed) Inject water through one petcock until it exits other petcock Jar container until air is expelled Close air bleeder valve Pump air into chamber until gage at initial pressure line Wait a few seconds Stabilize gage-pump or bleed off as necessary Close both petcocks Open air valve between air chamber and bowl Tap sides with mallet-stabilize gage Read meter
C31 Forming Test specimens in the field Cylindrical molds dampen mold 3 layer 25 rodding smart tapping routine, penetrate lower layer ~1" for 6" dia. molds Beam molds coat mold in mineral oil.. For our size mold, place in 2 layers, rod one time for each 2 in2 of top surface area Place specimens on vibration free surface and cover with damp cloth or water proof cover
For your Laboratory, return in approximately 24 hrs (+/- 8hrs), remove cylindrical mold and trash the mold (save the lid), identify cylinder with date and name and place in humid room. Remove beam mold and reassemble and place on the storage shelf and place beam in humid room.