Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mission: Strategic deterrence Description: Develop submarine to replace existing OHIO Class SSBNs as they reach the end of their service lives. A portion of effort develops a Common Missile Compartment (CMC) that will be used by both the U.S. and UK for their replacement SSBNs. Employment: Strategic deterrent patrols
Propulsor
Modular Construction Updateable Electronics Systems Electric Drive Integrated Tube / Hull Construction Extended Service Life
Coordinated Stern
SSBN Design
Improved Availability
All areas must remain aligned and properly resourced for the program to succeed
Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014
Right Funding
My top priority is the SSBN(X) and the strategic nuclear deterrentI will fund that above all else
ADM Jonathan Greenert, Chief of Naval Operations 18 Sep 2013
Right UK Support
today we are on schedule in terms of both the OHIO Replacement Program schedule and supporting the [UKs] SUCCESSOR.
The Honorable Sean Stackley, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition 26 Mar 2014
ADM John Richardson, Director Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program 27 Mar 2014
As long as these [nuclear] weapons exist, the United States will maintain a safe, secure, and effective arsenal to deter any adversary, and guarantee that defense to our allies
there's a 15-year period where it [the OHIO Replacement] will be the largest part of our shipbuilding program[this] puts extraordinary pressure on our shipbuilding program.
ADM Jonathan Greenert, Chief of Naval Operations 27 Mar 2014 The Honorable Sean Stackley, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition 26 Mar 2014
We are exactly on track now in terms of the early engineering, the research and development that need to happen...
The Honorable Ray Mabus, Secretary of the U.S. Navy 27 Mar 2014
The one thing that we can control today is obviously trying to keep the cost down by making sure that the defense -- the design and -- and engineering budget request for Ohio replacement is protected.
U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, (D-CT) HASC 12 Sep 2013
the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Navy should make every effort to ensure that the common missile compartment associated with the OHIO-Class ballistic missile submarine replacement program stays on schedule and is aligned with the Vanguard-successor program in order for the United States to fulfill its longstanding commitment to our ally and partner in seabased strategic deterrence.
We are able to protect research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) funding to the Ohio Replacement Programour top priority program-on track.
ADM Jonathan Greenert, Chief of Naval Operations 12 Sep 2013
Our national security rests on our ability to deliver this boat on time and within budget.
U.S. Rep. J. Randy Forbes, (R-VA) HASC 12 Sep 2013
Even in a time of declining resources, it's crucial that our nation continue to retain our strategic advantage in undersea warfare.
U.S. Rep. J. Randy Forbes, (R-VA) HASC 12 Sep 2013
The U.S. and the U.K. have maintained a shared commitment to nuclear deterrence. Our programs are tightly coupled both programmatically and technically to ensure we are providing the most cost effective, technically capable nuclear deterrent for both nations.
We are leading the charge in affordability. We are at the forefront of implementing Secretary Kendall's [Better Buying Power] efforts.
RADM David Johnson, Program Executive Officer for Submarines 12 Sep 2013
12 OHIO Replacement SSBNs to replace 14 OHIOs Life of ship reactor core Reduced mid-life maintenance period Maximize reuse of OHIO and VIRGINIA components to minimize cost
In an Affordable Package
Lead ship construction must commence in 2021 First Strategic Patrol in 2031 Maintains fleet of 10 operational SSBNs through transition to OHIO Replacement Procurement timeline meets USSTRATCOM requirements with moderate operational risk during transition period no additional room for delay Low margin for unforeseen SSBN maintenance issues or late OHIO Replacement delivery 12 OHIO Replacement SSBNs needed to meet long term requirements during OHIO Replacement mid-life overhaul period
Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014 Number of Operation SSBNs
Transition Period
At Responsible Cost.
5
Concept Studies
Component Evaluation / Tech. Road Maps Point Studies
Construction
Lead Ship Authorization
Baseline Integrated Master Schedule Ship Mfg Assbly Plans Ship Specifications System Definition Documents
Ship Specifications System Descriptions and Rev A Diagrams System Descriptions CMC MT CMC MT First Article MTs ITH Prototypes Ship Detailed Arrangements Ship Construction Design Disclosure and NC Data First Article Quad Pk
Shipboard Prototypes SWSA V&V Testing UK CMC and Ship Construction Non-Shipboard Prototype Design / Construction OR AP / LLTM OHIO Replacement Lead Ship Construction Lead Ship T&E
Updated 3/11/14
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
ITH Forging & MT HY80 Plate Contract Award 1st Forging Complete 6/13 ITH Weldment Assembly and Hatch Cylinder, Eject Pipe, Miscellaneous Attachments Contract Award 11/13 Hatch, Locking Ring, Miscellaneous Liners, and Monel Liners Contract Award 2/14 Access Doors & Associated Liners Contract Award 5/14
CMC Program Milestone #11 Missile Tube Supplier Down Select 11/13
Assembly
CMC Program Milestone #21 Start U.S./UK Missile Tube Build 11/14
Outfitting Fixture
F Fixture
State of the Art Construction Processes Minimize Cost and Save Time
OHIO Replacement Quad Pack Construction Process
F-Fixture
10
11
OHIO Replacement Program Alignment with OSD Better Buying Power 2.0
Achieve Affordable Programs
Milestone A Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) established affordability targets Established a Design For Affordability (DFA) management team and plan with shipbuilder Utilizing incentives to ensure overall program affordability Planning to take advantage of block buy / multi-year procurement savings
EOQ and multi-year procurement Facilities Design for producability Requirements and regulations Integrated Product Development Environment (IPDE) Manufacturing technologies, service, and support Average Follow-on Ship CY10 $= $4.9B
(CY10 $s) Costs developed by NAVSEA05C for OHIO Replacement Service Cost Position; Inflation based on NAVSEA 05C Jan 2010 SCN Shipbuilding Composite Inflation Table
13
Focused on a successful Technology Development and Engineering Integration to support an affordable FY21 lead ship construction for the 12 ship class
Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014
14
ILLINOIS
Scott Forge
MASSACHUSETTS
General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems (GDAIS) L-3 Henschel
SWITZERLAND
APCO Technologies
CALIFORNIA
SPAWAR San Diego Northrop Grumman Marine Systems Lockheed Martin Space Systems IEC-L3
PENNSYLVANIA
ARL / Penn State Naval Foundry & Propeller Center WHEMCO, Inc.
MARYLAND
VIRGINIA
SPAWAR Norfolk HII-Newport News Shipbuilding Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Sensors NSWC Dahlgren Northrop GrummanSperry Marine
GEORGIA
Kings Bay Naval Base
FLORIDA
Naval Ordnance Test Unit Cape Canaveral Goodrich
SPAWAR Charleston
16