Disruptions: How the F.A.A., Finally, Caught Up to an Always-On Society - NYTimes.

com

Technology Personal Tech Business Day

Log In Register Now

OCTOBER 6, 2013, 11:00 AM

46 Comments
PREVIOUS POST NEXT POST

Disruptions: How the F.A.A., Finally, Caught Up to an Always-On Society

By NICK BILTON

An App That Saved 10,000 Lives

Twitter C.E.O. Defends Representation of Women at the Company Sort Of

TweetDeck to Profit from Twitter I.P.O. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL | Investors in London-based TweetDeck, acquired by Twitter in 2011, expect large payouts from the pending I.P.O. - Mark Scott How Instagram Took Over the World in Just Three Years THE TELEGRAPH | Instagram turned three years old on Sunday. A snapshot of its life so far. - Vindu Goel What's Not in Twitter's I.P.O. Filing QUARTZ | Under the Jobs Act, Twitter was allowed to leave out two years of financial data. And it did. - Suzanne
Spector

Twitter Quitters
TECHCRUNCH UK |

Why people leave Twitter, and why it's a problem for the company's plans to go public. - Suzanne

Spector
SEE MORE

Marty Katz for The New York Times

AROUND THE WEB

THE VERGE REUTERS

Passengers on a Southwest Airlines flight from Baltimore to Denver in August.

FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+ SAVE E-MAIL SHARE PRINT

You know the scene in a movie when a character trails off into the past and is reminded of the moment it all began? I had one of those last week. It was 2011, and I was engrossed in an e-book on my Kindle and kept reading as I boarded a plane heading back to San Francisco. My head down, I bumped into the plane door, then into a passenger. I finally buckled in, continuing to read. Then, just a few pages from the end of the book, I heard it. Please power down your electronic devices for takeoff. Millions of people have heard this command, but I couldnt help wondering how a $70 Kindle, which has the electronic innards of a glorified calculator, could make a $100 million plane fall from the sky? After the trip (and finally finishing my book), I asked Les Dorr, a spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration, why the rule existed. He said, The agency would rather err on the side of caution when it comes to digital devices on planes. Not long after that flight, I wrote a column with the headline, Fliers Must Turn Off Devices, but Its Not Clear Why. Within minutes, the e-mails questioning the ban on electronics during takeoffs and landings started pouring into my in-box. The column received 257 comments and was shared thousands of times on social media. Other Americans, it seemed, were as perplexed as me. Over the next two years, I wrote more than a dozen pieces questioning the

Google is building Chrome OS straight into Windows 8

Cisco, Google, SAP discussing BlackBerry bids sources

MOST VIEWED 1. Disruptions: How the F.A.A., Finally, Caught Up to

an Always-On Society

2. Google Is Exploring an Alternative to Cookies for

Ad Tracking

3. An App That Saved 10,000 Lives 4. Twitter C.E.O. Defends Representation of Women at
the Company -- Sort Of

5. Mark Hurd, Oracle's Master Salesman, Wants Your

Business

THE MARKETS

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/disruptions-as-society-changes-a-brighter-future-for-devices-on-planes/?_r=0#![10/7/2013 10:12:42 PM]

Disruptions: How the F.A.A., Finally, Caught Up to an Always-On Society - NYTimes.com

rule. The New York Times employed EMT Labs, an independent testing facility in Mountain View, Calif., to see if a Kindle actually gave off enough electromagnetic emissions to affect a plane. The findings: An Amazon Kindle emitted less than 30 microvolts per meter when in use. That is only 0.00003 of a volt. A Boeing 747 must withstand 200 volts per square meter. That is millions of Kindles packed into each square meter of the plane. Still, the F.A.A. said No. But then something started to change: society. For many years, we have heard that paper will one day be replaced by display screens. Printers, fax machines and even print books and magazines would be things of the past. And over the last few years it started to happen. While we may not have noticed it as much in the workplace or at home, it was on planes, places with strict rules about using the devices, that we saw how much people had come to depend on electronic devices. And we also saw how slowly government comically, at times adapts to technology. Last week, a 28-member panel set up last year to revise policies for electronics on airplanes recommended that the F.A.A. change the rule, allowing passengers to use their devices from gate to gate, including takeoff, taxiing and landing. Cellphone calls will still banned. People will probably be asked to turn their gadgets to airplane mode when they fly. I asked one of the panels members last week how the panel knew that changing the rule would not make planes, and the Kindles and iPads and passengers inside those planes, drop from the sky. Paul Misener, vice president for global public policy at Amazon and chairman of the technical subcommittee of the F.A.A. working group, said we could actually thank old television sets for this history of gadget regulation on planes. There were a couple of cases decades ago where there were interferences noticed to some avionics, typically very old avionics, from devices like FM radios, or TV receivers with vacuum tubes, Mr. Misener said. There were instances where a plane would fly through a radar beam or a TV signal and see interference, and as a result, both the F.A.A. and the international community adopted rules that planes had to be resilient to those interferences. As a result, he said, they also unwittingly protected planes from future electronics. Todays devices, Mr. Misener said, produce barely external electricity. The opportunities for interference are tiny, he said. Aircraft dont have avionics that operate on the same bands as portable devices, therefore the equipment is resilient to interference. Mr. Misener said that going into the committee he knew it wasnt a matter of science. Several years ago, we filled up a commercial airplanes (Republic Airlines) with Kindles and turned them all on, he said. Something like 150 Kindles; the plane didnt experience any problems. Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri, who has pressed the F.A.A. to relax the ban, said telling the flying public that a device could interfere with a plane was one of those silly rules that make people roll their eyes at other, more rational rules, like obeying the fasten seat belt sign. If people are being told to do things because it keeps the public safe, there
LATEST FROM BITS
Daily Report: Twitter Rivals Seek Share of Social Media Pie Daily Report: Europe Weighs Regulations for Cloud Computing Twitter C.E.O. Defends Representation of Women at the Company Sort Of Disruptions: How the F.A.A., Finally, Caught Up to an Always-On Society An App That Saved 10,000 Lives

FOLLOW BITS ANYWHERE

MOBILE SITE When your need to know is right now. BLACKBERRY SHORTCUT Download for quick access to up-to-the minute technology news.

TWITTER

RSS

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/disruptions-as-society-changes-a-brighter-future-for-devices-on-planes/?_r=0#![10/7/2013 10:12:42 PM]

Disruptions: How the F.A.A., Finally, Caught Up to an Always-On Society - NYTimes.com

needs to be solid scientific data that supports that, and clearly that was not the case with this prohibition, Ms. McCaskill said. There is, however, one caveat to all this: people on the committee have warned that the F.A.A. might still take another year or more to carry out the rule. Ms. McCaskill said she was not prepared to wait. If the F.A.A. doesnt come out with a reasonably prompt timeline in the next 60 to 90 days, then I will go full bore to get this done legislatively, she said. With a report in hand that says devices cannot harm a plane, she said, it will be easy to push through legislation requiring the change.

SAVE

E-MAIL

SHARE

PRINT

Related Articles Also Tagged:

AIRLINES AND AIRPLANES, ELECTRONICS, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

F.A.A. to Consider Relaxed Rules for Devices on Planes Its Called Airplane Mode for a Reason Daily Report: F.A.A. Supports Easing Rules for Electronic Devices Answers to Readers Questions About Electronics on Planes Many Air Passengers Never Turn Off Electronics, Survey Finds

PREVIOUS POST

NEXT POST

An App That Saved 10,000 Lives

Twitter C.E.O. Defends Representation of Women at the Company Sort Of

47 Comments
Share your thoughts.
ALL READER PICKS

Newest

Write a Comment

Bruce Backa

Nashua, NH

The challenge for me is when the government refuses to recognize the obvious. I know dozens of people who have been refusing to turn off their devices in silent protest for year. And hundreds more who simply forget. If there were any valid issue here, planes would have been falling from the skies daily. I believe this took so long simply because the Airline Industry could find no result worth lobbying for.
Oct. 7, 2013 at 10:09 p.m.

Paquito

New York

It reminded me of the stupid questions that still get made in some airports around the world "has anybody given you any package to carry during this trip?", "who packed your luggage and when?" "has it been with you at all times?"... it took years to remove that ridiculous and evidently ineffective policy.
Oct. 7, 2013 at 8:53 p.m.
RECOMMENDED

Carillon Orban

GA

If it was that easy to bring down a plane with electronics, the terrorists wouldn't need to try and set their shoes and underwear on fire.

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/disruptions-as-society-changes-a-brighter-future-for-devices-on-planes/?_r=0#![10/7/2013 10:12:42 PM]

Disruptions: How the F.A.A., Finally, Caught Up to an Always-On Society - NYTimes.com

READ MORE COMMENTS

Copyright 2013 The New York Times Company

Privacy

Terms of Service

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/disruptions-as-society-changes-a-brighter-future-for-devices-on-planes/?_r=0#![10/7/2013 10:12:42 PM]