Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Section Number: 22 Meeting Days/Times: MWF 11:45-12:40 Winter 2014 Classroom: State Hall 135 Instructor: Ruth Haller WSU email address: ruth.haller@wayne.edu Office Hours (days/times): Monday and Friday 10:30-11:30
2. to have students integrate reading, research, and writing in the academic genres of analysis and argument; and 3. to teach students to develop analyses and arguments using research-based content, effective organization, and appropriate expression and mechanics, all while using a flexible writing process that incorporates drafting, revising, editing, and documenting sources.
Learning Outcomes
Students who pass ENG 1020 will produce writing that demonstrates core abilities in four key areas: Writing Write effectively for various rhetorical situations (considering elements such as genre, context, discourse community, claims, evidence, organization, style, rhetorical strategies, and persuasive effect), using a flexible writing process and varied technologies. Reading Use analytical and critical strategies to read complex texts in a variety of media, and to identify and evaluate elements of the rhetorical situation (including those listed above). Researching Conduct research by finding and evaluating print, electronic, and other sources; generate information and ideas from research; and appropriately integrate material from sources. Reflecting Use reflection to make choices and changes in both the composing process and products in this course and to explain how you will use skills you have learned to approach unfamiliar writing tasks.
Required Text
Devitt, et al. The Wayne Writer. Custom ed. New York: Pearson, 2013. Print, eText available. ISBN: 1269416456.
Recommended Texts
Ruszkiewicz, John, Daniel Seward, Christy Friend, and Maxine Hairston. The Scott, Foresman Writer. 5th ed. Boston: Longman, 2011. Print. ISBN-10: 0321873432 (bundled w/ MyCompLab card) ISBN-13: 9780321873439 Graff, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton, 2010. Print. ISBN 978039393361-1.
writing, and revising during these in-class workshop sessions. You only get a couple per unit, which does not add up to a lot of time. Be prepared to put in lots of work at home or in the library! For each major project, you will be submitting a rough draft for peer review, but also a copy for me. This gives me the opportunity to see your project before it is submitted in its final form and to offer feedback and commentary. Additionally, you may choose to revise ONE major project after it has received its final grade. This will require that you first compose a two-page memo to me which details what you specifically are planning on changing and why. After your memo receives approval from me, you may submit the revised draft of your project. The revised draft needs to be re-submitted within 2 weeks from the time you received your graded project back. This revision offer is only valid on projects 1, 2, and 3.
Rhetorical Analysis: For this project, you will be watching a documentary of your choice (based on a list provided by me) and analyzing how tactics of persuasion work within that
documentary. You must be able to identify the basic argument being made by the documentarymakers, but then focus heavily on what they are doing to get you to believe their argument. Pay attention to aesthetic choices, as well as to the quality of the sources the documentary uses. This paper should be a minimum of 6 full pages and should not exceed 8 pages. The rough draft must be ready and in class for peer review on Febuary 19. The final draft is due via Blackboard on February 24. Concepts Emphasized: Argument, claim, rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), aesthetics Learning Outcomes Emphasized: Reading, Writing, Reflection Analysis 15 pts
Research Project: You will pick a topic that interests you personally, and one that affects a discourse community in which you participate, then produce a research question based off of that topic. You will then begin the process of research on the question; through this process of research you will formulate a claim and then compose a formal research paper to prove and defend that claim. You will find a proper balance of rhetorical appeals to use to persuade your audience that your claim is correct. A large part of this will come through demonstrating the research you have done, and citing it properly. This project includes a library visit day, a separate research day (to locate print sources, too must report back to me at the end), detailed lessons on plagiarism, citation, and source incorporation. Your research paper must be a minimum of 10 full pages, and must not exceed 12 pages. This project also includes a reflective portion, which details the process of researching and writing the paper at different points throughout the project: what worked, what didnt, what would you do differently, etc? Basically you will be narrating, or telling the story of your process of researching. You will use this process of metacognition as you work on the project because it gives you the opportunity to draft and revise and then draft again, thinking critically about your writing and research process as you go along, instead of after youve received your grade. Concepts Emphasized: Research, Metacognition, Academic Sources, Citation, Process Learning Outcomes Emphasized: Reading, Writing, Researching, Reflecting Research Paper - 25 pts Reflective Pieces 6 pts (2 per reflection)
Reflective Argument: To pass this course, students must complete a final portfolio and reflective argument assignment required by the WSU Composition Program. This assignment is designed to prepare students to transfer knowledge and skills from ENG 1020 to subsequent courses and other writing contexts. It is based in research in psychology and
writing studies. This research shows that metacognition, or analysis of ones own thinking processes, is key to helping people transfer knowledge and skills from the context where they were initially learned to future contexts. You will be re-reading and analyzing your written pieces from this course, and using them to prove that you deserve to pass the course, based on how you utilized the learning outcomes in the pieces you choose. This paper should be a minimum of 6 full pages, and should not exceed 10. You will also submit a portfolio which includes all of the pieces that you reference in your reflective argument.
Concepts Emphasized: Metacognition Learning Outcomes Emphasized: Reading, Writing, Reflection Reflective Argument: 20 pts
Grading
Genre Analysis Rhetorical Analysis 10% 15%
Argument Essay Reflective Argument and Portfolio Reflection Assignments Peer Review Attendance and Class Participation Comprehension Responses Required Conferences Plagiarism Quizzes Total
WSU Grading Scale: A AB+ B BC+ C CD+ D DF 94-100% 90-93% 87-89% 84-86% 80-83% 77-79% 74-76% 70-73% 67-69% 64-66% 60-63% 59% or less
A grade of C or better fulfills the General Education IC requirement and the prerequisite for General Education WI courses.
Attendance Policy
Class attendance is required, and attendance will be taken at each class session. Arriving more than 20 minutes late will count as an absence. Attendance, preparedness, and active participation count as 5% percent of the final grade. Preparedness and active participation are defined by reading assigned texts for class (and being able to respond to questions and discussion about them), being involved in class conversations, contributing extensively during peer review and other group activities, and in general, proving that you have done the assigned work and learned the skills required to pass this course. Final grades drop by half a percent for each absence after three, and students will fail the course after five absences. Please do not feel the need to provide me with excuses or reasons for absence. You have three unpenalized absences, and if you need to miss after that, points will be taken off of your grade regardless of the situation. So dont skip class in the beginning of the semester because you dont feel like coming, and then expect to have me excuse your absence later on when you have a funeral to attend. In addition, please be aware that if you leave class early, that will ALSO count as an absence, unless you have given me prior notice before class begins that you have somewhere to be.
Please do not ask me what you missed in class if you are absent or late. You may check the course weebly site, or ask a fellow student. When you need to contact me outside of class, please use my WSU email address. Do not attempt to contact me via the weebly site. Class Size/English Department Attendance Policy/Adding ENG 1020: Enrollment in ENG 1020 is capped at 26 students. Students must attend one of the first two class days to stay enrolled in the course. Students who do not attend of the first two class meetings may be asked to drop to avoid a failing grade.
When page-length requirements are given, this means that you must submit that number of FULL pages. For example, if a paper is a minimum of 8 pages, it must be 8 COMPLETE pages, not 7.5 pages, etc . Please use MLA format for citations (we will discuss this in class) Revised material (including material from a previous assignment used in a subsequent assignment): highlight all new and changed material using MS-Words Track Changes feature to receive credit.)
Late work: My time is important to me, just as yours is to you, and I dont have a lot of it. In light of this, the following policies are in place. Students must contact me 48 hours in advance if major projects cannot be submitted by the due date. No instructor comments will be provided, but no points will be taken off provided you have contacted me 48 hours before the due date/time. This allowance will only be made ONCE per student. Otherwise, I will determine specific grade reductions based on timely prior notification, whether revised deadlines are met, and similar factors. In general, for every day the final draft of a major project is late, it loses an entire letter grade (10%). Rough drafts, comprehension responses, plagiarism quizzes, and other minor written work will not be accepted late. You have all the due-dates for major projects in this syllabus, so dont let these dates creep up on you. Be on top of your work this semester, and there wont be any issues. First Week: If a student misses the first two class sessions, s/he will be asked to drop the course to avoid a failing grade. Students may add the course during the first week of classes but not after that. Office Hours: I have two scheduled office hours a week: 10:30-11:30 on Mondays and Fridays (right before class). I encourage you to come meet with me during office hours if you have questions, need some guidance specific to your project, or want to discuss your grade. If you have other classes or obligations during this time, please inform me and we can try to meet at a different time. You are always free to contact me via email (listed at the top of this syllabus). However, please be aware that I will not discuss grades or any major aspects of your project via email. These sorts of issues need to be addressed in office hours. Grade Center: Grades will be posted on the Blackboard Grade Center shortly after they are handed back in class. Please check the Grade Center frequently to get an idea of where you stand in the class. Pass Requirements: With a grade of C or better, this course satisfies the general education requirement for intermediate composition (IC). To meet university criteria for fulfilling this requirement, the course includes writing assignments totaling at least 32 pages (8000 or more words). There is no final exam.
Disability Information: Students who may need an accommodation based on the impact of a disability should contact the instructor privately to discuss specific needs. Additionally, the Student Disabilities Services Office coordinates reasonable accommodations for students with documented disabilities. The office is located in 1600 David Adamany Undergraduate Library, phone: 313-577-1851/577-3335 (TTD). http://studentdisability.wayne.edu Additional resources: The Academic Success Centerhttp://www.success.wayne.edu and Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS) http://www.caps.wayne.edu.
Plagiarism Policy
Plagiarism is the act of copying work from books, articles, and websites without citing and documenting the source. Plagiarism includes copying language, texts, and visuals without citation (e.g., cutting and pasting from websites). Plagiarism also includes submitting papers (or sections of papers) that were written by another person, including another student, or downloaded from the Internet. Plagiarism is a serious academic offense. One instance of plagiarism, no matter how small, will result in an F for that piece of written work. A second instance of plagiarism will result in failure of the course. Instructors are required to report all cases of plagiarism to the English Department. Information on plagiarism procedures is available in the Department.