Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Short term and long term memory STM 7 +/- 2 20-30 seconds acoustic LTM unlimited unlimited Semantic (meaning) SM all sensory experience to second sense specific
Encoding: the way in which information is stored/put into/processed into memory, eg acoustic, visual,
semantic.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Like most memory research this lacks ecological validity. Youre using your memory for an artificial task. Previous sequences could add confusion
Strengths
Weaknesses
Lacks EV, was an artificial task and lack of control due to independent group design Doesnt consider other methods of encoding, Posner found that visual encoding can take precedence over acoustic as AA was processed over Aa despite no different sound+
Models of memory
Mutli-store model Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968)
3 stores in memory Information from environment goes into sensory memory; its then encoded and goes to STM. After being further processed and rehearsed, its transferred to LTM
Strengths
Primacy effect: participants can recall first items from a list the best as earlier items are rehearsed better and therefore are in LTM Recency effect: last few items are better remembered as they are still in STM People with Korsakoffs syndrome can recall last few items as they have an unaffected STM but their LTM is poor: shows there are separate stores like the model suggests
Weaknesses
In real life, people dont always rehearse to transfer information to LTM. Some items, like smells, cant be rehearsed Model is over-simplified. Evidence from brain damaged patients suggest several short term and long term stores In the case of long-term memory, it is unlikely that different kinds of knowledge, such as remembering how to play a computer game, the rules of subtraction and remembering what we did yesterday are all stored within a single, long-term memory store. Indeed different types of long-term memory have been identified, namely episodic (memories of events), procedural (knowledge of how to do things) and semantic (general knowledge).
Strengths
Case study of KF suggested impaired articulatory loop as problems with recalling words presented verbally but not visually It explains a lot more than the multistore model. It makes sense of a range of tasks - verbal reasoning, comprehension, reading, problem solving and visual and spatial processing. The working memory applies to real life tasks such as reading (phonological loop), problem solving (central executive) and navigation (visual and spatial processing)
Weaknesses
It fails to account for musical memory because we are able to listen to instrumental music without impairing performance on other acoustic tasks. Doesnt explain central executive, we dont know its capacity
VSS implies that all spatial information was first visual (they are linked). However, Lieberman points out that blind people have excellent spatial awareness although they have never had any visual information
Case Study of K.F. - Shallice & Warrington (1970) This study proves that the different parts of the multi-store model can be damaged separately because K.F's LTM was unaffected by the motorbike accident while his STM was severely damaged. Case Study of H.M. - Milner et al (1978) This study supports the theory that the multi-store model can be affected at individual parts because while H.M's STM and LTM both worked almost normally, he lost the ability to transfer the information from the STM to the LTM, however he could recall information from the LTM to the STM.
Eyewitness testimony
EWT is evidence produced by people who witnessed a particular event. It relies on recall from memory.
Loftus and Palmer proved that leading questions can affect accuracy
Participants were shown a film of a car crash and were asked how fast do you think the cars were going when they hit/smashed/collided/bumped/contacted? (different word for each group) Smashed gave the highest estimated speed average of 41 mph whereas contacted gave lowest average of 32 mph 3 groups were asked the same question with either smashed, hit or no indication of the speed. They were then asked a week later: did you see any broken glass? There wasnt actually any broken glass, but the majority of those who said yes h ad been asked the smashed question
Experiment 1
Experiment 2
Conclusion: leading questions can affect peoples accuracy of the event Strengths Weaknesses
Video wouldnt be as emotionally arousing; a later study shows that people who actually witnessed a robbery were more accurate in describing the robber. Experimental design leads to demand characteristics. Results could have been skewed due to people realising the aim: effects reliability and validity
Loftus and Zany: showed a film of a car accident and asked participants whether they saw a or the broken light. 7% of a said yes but 17% of the said yes- shows the use of the or a affected accuracy.
Factors affecting EWT Valentine and Coxon found that AGE effects EWT
There were 3 groups: children, young adults and elderly. They were shown a video of a kidnapping and were asked leading and non-leading questions. Results: the elderly and children group gave more incorrect answers to the non-leading questions. Conclusion: age does affect EWT Strengths Useful for police investigations to know when questioning Weaknesses Video wouldnt be as emotionally arousing; a later study shows that people who actually witnessed a robbery were more accurate in describing the robber.
Flin et al (1992) staged an incident and questioned children and adults about it a day later and again five months later. Both groups (young and old) performed equally well the following day but after five months the childrens group had forgotten significantly more suggesting the EWT of children becomes less reliable over time.
Yuille and Cutshall wanted to investigate the accuracy in recall of eyewitnesses to a real crime
In Vancouver, a thief tied up a gun-shop owner and stole money and guns from the shop. The thief ran off and the owner freed himself and armed himself with a gun. The owner went outside to take note of the thief's registration number. However, the thief wasn't in the car yet and shot the owner twice from six feet away. After a momentary pause, the owner shot the thief with all six bullets from his revolver and killed him.
20 eyewitnesses were contacted by researchers 4 - 5 months after the event . 13 people agreed to participate in the study and they were all aged 15-32 ( three were female and ten were male). They used the same interviewing procedure as the police had used allowing them to give their account first and were then asked questions. As one of the aims was to look into the effects of leading questions, half the group were asked if they saw a broken headlight, and the other half if they saw the broken headlight, when in fact there was no broken headlight in the thiefs car. Similarly, half of the participants were asked about a yellow panel on the car, and the others about the yellow panel, whereas the quarter panel was really blue. Result: The study showed that eyewitnesses were actually very reliable. There were several factors which made this true, including correctly recalling large numbers of accurate details; almost always arguing the misleading questions and a healthy comparison between the police and researcher interviews.
Strengths Great care was taken when counting the details from the real incident to make sure that the witnesses testimonies did not alter that which really happened, and this scoring procedure allowed for reliable findings This is a field study that looks at a real incident with real eyewitnesses. It therefore has strong validity, which laboratory experiments which had been previously used to look at testimony lacked
Weaknesses Lacks generalizability as this was a one-off incident and a field study
weak points in the scoring, eg a question based on age: the thief was actually 35 years of age, and when asked to estimate the age, most eyewitnesses said he looked as though he was in his early 20s which was marked as an inaccurate memory, even though he really did look that age
Cognitive interview
Is used to increase accuracy of witnesses recall during police questioning, reduces effect of leading questions and enhances memory recall
Evidence suggests that we are more likely to recall information if it is in a similar context to when it was first experienced or learned, so putting ourselves in a similar state of mind should aid recall.
Points three and four are based on the idea that once a memory has been stored there is more
Recall from a different perspective: It encourages witnesses to view the scene as others present may have seen it, for example as other witnesses, the victim or the perpetrator may have seen the incident.
Visual Mnemonics Mind Mapping: Creating a map of branches of information coming from other information. It can be memorable by using different colours, shorter words, images, clarity and personalising it. Keyword Method: Using an image to link two different pieces of information e.g. by imagining a horse with a large eye, it can be remembered that the word caballo (spanish for horse) is pronounced cab eye-oh Method of loci: You would think of a route you take regularly and you would then associate the words to locations on the route.
Strengths
Weaknesses Memorising doesnt mean understanding You still need to remember the mnemonic
Results: The group who used the story method recalled 93% of the nouns compared to only 13% in the other
group. In another experiment, Bower gave participants 100 cards each with two unrelated words. One group simply memorised the words and the others were asked to produce a visual image linking the two words (e.g. door and cat). Results: When cued (given the first word e.g. door) the visual imagers were far more likely to recall the second word (80%) than the non-imagers (45%). Strengths Control condition means that independent variable can be effectively measured Weaknesses Lacks EV- they wouldnt have asked these tasks in real life
Attachment
Attachment: a strong emotional bond
Attached infants show desire to be close to the primary caregiver and show distress when separated and pleasure when reunited.
These finding were useful in real-life as it led to babies in incubators to be given blankets
Schaffer and Emerson did a longitudinal study of 60 babies at monthly intervals for the first 18
months of life. The children were all studied in their own home and a regular pattern was identified in the development of attachment. The babies were visited monthly for approximately one year, their interactions with their carers were observed, and carers were interviewed. Evidence for the development of an attachment was that the baby showed separation anxiety after a carer left. They discovered that baby's attachments develop in the following sequence: Up to 3 months of age - Indiscriminate attachments. The new-born is predisposed to attach to any human. Most babies respond equally to any caregiver. After 4 months - Preference for certain people. Infants they learn to distinguish primary and secondary caregivers but accept care from anyone; After 7 months - Special preference for a single attachment figure. The baby looks to particular people for security, comfort and protection. It shows fear of strangers (stranger fear) and separation anxiety After 9 months - Multiple attachments. The baby becomes increasingly independent and forms several attachments.
Conclusion: of the study indicated that attachments were most likely to form with those who responded
accurately to the baby's signals, not the person they spent most time with. The most important fact in forming attachments is not who feeds and changes the child but who plays and communicates with him or her.
Strengths Since babies were observed in their own homes (a natural environment) we can assume that the study is high in ecological validity; the findings can be generalised to the real world.
Weaknesses However, accuracy of data collection by parents who were keeping daily diaries whilst clearly being very busy could be questioned.
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenbergs meta-analysis found secure attachment was the most common in all cultures studied. The lowest % of secure attachment was shown in China, and the highest in Great Britain. Avoidant attachment was more common in West Germany but rare in Israel and Japan. BUT, some studies had limited samples eg UK had 72 pairs whereas China had 25. Sample may not even represent whole population- lacks EV. Comparative data is more reliable however as it only looked at studies with an identical methodology (SS) in gathering their data
^^found intra-cultural variations as everyone in a culture has different practices eg middle class and working class in UK have different child-rearing techniques. A country therefore doesnt represent a culture. Evidence for Bowlby: he argued it is innate, and therefore effects infants of every culture. Cross cultural similarity shows s this.
found they were more insecure than secure could be due to different childbearing practices eg German culture involves keeping distance between child and parent so less proximity-seeking behaviours in strange situation and thus appear to be insecurely attached
Foxs Israeli kibbutzim study infants were mostly cared for in a communal childrens home by nurses attachment was tested using strange situation with nurse and mother, infants appeared equally attached but not in reunion behaviour- showed greater attachment to mother suggesting mothers were still the primary attachment figure demonstrates monotropy being universal, despite differences in childcare practices
Takahashi looked at Japanese infants using SS similar rates of secure attachment to USA, but higher rates of insecure-resistant and no insecure-avoidant very distressed when left alone- for 90% of infants the study was stopped due to childcare, as infants rarely experience separation from mother which would make them appear insecurely attached
Strengths
Weaknesses Depends on researcher- there is observer bias: interpreting childs behaviour on their own cultural expectations and this may differ between researchers. Lacks validity Imposed etic: Ainsworth used her own cultural views of attachment as an American to define it, which may not be the same for all. Eg separation anxiety: on kibbutzim, children are used to not living with parents and therefore wouldnt be distressed on separation, they would be classified as insecurely attached doesnt take differences of cultures into account.
Secure attachment is the norm for all cultures which shows attachment as innate and universal. But there are cross cultural differences, so secure attachment should be defined specific to the culture.
Ethological approach
Ethology- the study of animals in their natural environment Konrad Lorenz found that geese automatically attach to the first moving thing they see after hatching and follow it everywhere IMPRINTING, which occurs during a CRITICAL PERIOD.
Strengths There is evidence- Harlows study shows we have an evolved need to attach and suggests social and emotional damage if there is no attachment Attachment does effect later romance in life, Hazan and Shavers love quiz found that people who had an avoidant and unhappy childhood due to parents were more likely to divorce and felt extremely jealous and obsessive
Weaknesses Disagrees with Schaffer and Emerson, who found that children form multiple attachments and may not even attach to their mother A poor early start can be overcome by positive experiences at school and good adult relationships (Rutter & Quinton 1988).
KEY VOCAB
Sensitive/critical period- period when human attachment occurs, approx first 2 years Imprinting- process of attaching to first moving being that the animal sees, takes place during sensitive/critical period and is irreversible Social releasers- eg crying, high forehead, big eyes, smiling. These all trigger an attachment response from the adult, which is needed for survival Secure base- attachment provides attachment allowing baby to explore their environment and develop socially and cognitively Monotropy- infants become most attached to those who respond most sensitively/correctly to them and one special relationship in formed.
Internal working model- This internal working model is a cognitive framework comprising mental representations for understanding the world, self and others. The primary caregiver acts as a prototype for future relationships via the internal working model.
Types of Attachment
SECURE
Theres a strong bond between the child and its caregiver. If theyre separated, the infant becomes distressed and when reunited, the child is easily comforted. These promote healthy cognitive and emotional development.
INSECURE
The bonds between child and caregiver are weaker. Ainsworth et al came up with two types: INSECURE-AVOIDANT
Child doesnt become distressed if separated from their caregiver and can be comforted by a stranger Child is uneasy around their caregiver but becomes upset if theyre separated. Comfort cant be given from strangers and is often resisted from the caregiver.
INSECURE-RESISTANT
Ainsworth et al found that infants reaction in a strange situation shows whether the infant is securely
attached In a controlled observation, 12-18 month old infants were left in a room with their mother. A stranger would enter the room, talk to the mother and then approach the baby. The mother would them leave them alone together. The mother would then return and comfort the baby. The baby would then be left alone, and the stranger would come in after a few minutes and attempt to comfort it. The mother would return after the stranger has tried. Results: 15% of infants were insecure avoidant and 15% were insecure-resistant, 70% were securely attached as they avoided strangers without the mother and became distressed if she left. Conclusion: infants showing different types of reactions to their carers have different types of attachment
Strengths Had strict control of variables and so the results were reliable. Marrone (1998), although the Strange Situation has been criticized for being stressful, it is simulating everyday experiences, as mothers do leave their babies for brief periods of time in different settings and often with unfamiliar people such as baby sitters.
Weaknesses Lab experiment means the study was artificial, and it lacks EV The parents may have changed their behaviour as they knew they were being observed, which could have affected the childs behaviour.
The new situation for the child might have affected their behaviour and so might not be accurate in real life.
The causes of different attachment types are debatable: could be sensitivity of caregivers or their inborn temperament
Cultural differences are found: Grossman et al claimed that more avoidant infants may be found in Germany due to the value of German dependence. Avoidance is seen as good.
The strange situation doesnt show characteristics of the child: it only shows the childs relationship with a specific person, might react differently with different carers
Resistant: insecure and attention seeking and have strong feelings on dependency on partners
Disruption of attachment
Separation: a child is away from a caregiver its attached to for a relatively short time, just hours or days Deprivation: loss of something that is wanted or needed. Maternal deprivation is the loss of the primary caregiver; the loss is more long-term or even permanent Effects of separation PDD model
PROTEST: child will protest at being separated from mother or other attachment figure by crying, panicking, calling for its mother DESPAIR: after a day of two, they lose interest in surroundings and become withdrawn with occasional crying. Will eat and sleep less DETACHMENT: after a few days, the child becomes alert again. It cries less and seems to have recovered. But its previous attachment may be permanently damaged- loss of security and trust.
Strengths Is useful as has implications for childcare. Findings suggest separating a child from its carers should be avoided.
Weaknesses Studies show that children who receive foster care do better than those in an institutionalised setting. children can still cope with separation as long as they still receive one-on-one emotional support Separations do not necessarily produce PDD effects. Many factors influence how a child reacts, eg age or quality of care during separation.
Goldfarb found that orphanage children who were socially and maternally deprived were later less intellectual and socially developed. This supports Bowlbys claims.
Anaclitic depression: appetite loss, sleeplessness and impaired social and intellectual development Deprivation dwarfism: infants are psychically underdeveloped due to emotional deprivation
Quinton et al compared 50 women who had experienced institutional care as children and 50 who didnt. The women raised in institutions were more likely to have parenting difficulties- suggesting a CYCLE of privation.
The effects of day-care on child development Clarke et al (1994) found positive effects of day care
It was a series of separate observations to examine the effects of the day care. One experiment looked at the peer relationships of 150 children aged 2-3 years, who came from different social backgrounds. In another, the strength of attachment in a group of 18-month olds who had at least 30 hours a week was measured- used the strange situation. Results were compared to children who had less than 10 hours a week of day care Day-care: temporary care provided Results: 2-3 year olds were good at coping with social by someone other than the parents situations and negotiating with each other. In the strange or guardians they live with. Eg day situation experiment, the 18 months who had high intensity day-care were distressed when separated from their mothers in nurseries, child-minders and comparison to low intensity nannies Conclusion: day-care can have positive effects on the development peer relationships 2-3 year olds. Attachment in 18month olds is not affected by temporary separation Strengths Weaknesses Observations were controlled, so could be easily Artificial study- lacks EV and results cant be replicated generalised to other children
Shea (1981) also found positive effects of day care Infants between 3 and 4 were videotaped in the playground during their first 10 weeks at nursery school. Their behaviour was assessed in terms of rough-and-tumble play, aggression, frequency of peer interaction, distance from teacher and distance from nearest child Result: Over the 10 weeks the childrens peer interaction increased and their distance from the teacher decreased. Decrease in aggression and increase in rough-and-tumble play. The increase in sociability was more evident in those who attend day-care 5 times a week than those who went 2 days a week Conclusion: day care causes children to become more sociable and les aggressive
Strengths Has EV as was in a natural setting Weaknesses Behaviour was open to interpretation- findings could be biased. Eg could be hard to differentiate between aggression and rough-and-tumble play
Belsky and Rovine (1988) found negative effects of day-care Infants were placed in the strange situation. One group had experienced no day care and one had had at least 20 hours per week before their first birthday Results: infants who received day-care were more likely to have insecure attachment Conclusion: day-care has a negative effect on an infants social development Strengths DiLalla (1998) also found negative effects on peer relationships. The more day-care, the less prosaically they behaved, eg the less they helped/shared Controlled observation, so good control of variables Weaknesses Lacks eve
Research has affected day care practices Scar 1998 identified several factors that make good day care: good staff training, adequate space, appropriate toys and activities, good ratio of staff to children, minimising turnover so children can form stable attachments TATRA Vandell et al found that children with good quality of day care were more likely to have friendly interactions with others compared to those receiving lower quality day care