A Fast MPPT Algorithm For Single Stage

Grid-connected PV Inverter
GU Jun-yin
School of Electromechanical Engineering and Automation
Shanghai University
Shanghai, China
junyin_gu@yahoo.com.cn
CHEN Guo-cheng
School of Electromechanical Engineering and Automation
Shanghai University
Shanghai, China
gchchen@mail.shu.edu.cn
Abstract In this paper, the power coupling relationship between
the PV array, the filtering capacitor, and the grid-connected PV
inverter was analyzed. The P/V characteristic was categorized
into three sections, the unstable area, the stable area, and the
sliding-mode stable area, a judging criterion was given. Through
theoretical and mathematical analysis, the periodic power
coupling can be reflected by the capacitor voltage and its change
in monotony. Based on the power decoupling of the capacitor in a
power cycle, by precisely calculating the required power
reference for the inverter in the following cycle, the MPPT
process can be optimized. The proposed method is especially
efficient during the MPPT dynamic process, i.e. during start-up
or when solar radiation changes sharply. An experimental 180W
prototype is designed for verification of the theoretical analysis.
Keywords grid-connected PV inverter; MPPT; power
coupling; filtering capacitor
I. INTRODUCTION
PV grid-connected inverters can be placed into single and
double stage inverterbased on their high-frequency power
conversion stages. Since the single stage inverter has only one
high-frequency power conversion stage, it has many
significant advantages, i.e. high conversion efficiency, high
utilization of photovoltaic components and high reliability [1-
5]. As shown in Figure 1, a single stage grid-connected PV
system includes the PV module, a grid-connected inverter and
the filtering capacitors. The PV modules output has
approximately a constant power flow, however the inverters
output has periodic fluctuations due to its grid-connecting
requirement. Therefore, filtering capacitors with large enough
capacity are necessary to balance the transient power
difference between the inverter and PV module. The filtering
capacitors in turn cause power coupling between the PV
module and the inverter.
The nonlinear relationship of the PV modules output
power and its output voltage is shown in Figure 2. In order to
achieve maximum output power, the PV module needs to be
controlled by using a maximum power point tracking
(MPPT) method [5-13]. The MPPT method is generally
PV
p
inv
p
c
p
pv
C
po
PV module
AC Power
Single-stage
grid-connected
inverter
Figure1. Single stage grid-connected PV power system
implemented with a small perturbation in the output power of
the PV module. This allows for the determination of the PV
modules output power changing trend, which will define the
next step of the algorithm. The small perturbation method
assumes that the characteristic of the PV module output is
stable. However, light and temperature conditions or other
external factors can significantly change the output
characteristics of the PV module. Due to the filtering
capacitors power coupling effect, the change of PV module
output power cannot be reflected by the inverters output
power in real time. For that reason, the MPPT based on the
steady-state analysis cannot guarantee that the inverters
output power can follow the changes in the PV modules
output power in real time. In the worst case, the MPPT
algorithm may fail, which will lead to a system crash.
References [5-6] state that by using a single stage
photovoltaic inverter, the capacitors voltage fluctuation
reflects the power relation between the PV module and the
inverter. Current-sensor-less MPPT algorithms are analyzed,
but no steady-state or dynamic performance analysis is given.
Reference [7] analyzes the steady-state performance of the
MPPT affected by the capacitors energy storage in single
stage inverter. However, it does not analyze the mutual
relationship between the dynamic MPPT performance and the
energy storage in the capacitor. Reference [9] analyzes the
stability of the MPPT algorithmof a single stage inverter with
the introducing of a variable step algorithm to improve the
dynamic performance, but it does not analyze the effect of the
storage capacitor on the MPPT performance.
In this paper, the power coupling of the filtering capacitor
in a single stage grid-connected inverter is studied. The output
characteristic of the PV module is divided into a non-stable
960 978-1-4577-2119-9/12/$26.00 c 2011 IEEE

area, a stable area, and a sliding mode area, with an
identification criteria being given. If the output power of the
1
A
0
A
2
A
2
B
0
B
1
B
p
u
p
m
u
m
A Zone M Zone B Zone
Figure2. The P/V characteristic of the PV array
PV module changes abruptly, the filtering capacitors voltage
changes and the power coupling relationship between the PV
module, filtering capacitor, and grid-connected inverter can be
used to accurately calculate the required power reference for
the inverter in the following cycle, by analytical calculations.
Within one power cycle, the power of the PV module, filtering
capacitor, and inverter is decoupled so to optimize the tracking
process of the MPPT and to improve its dynamic performance.
II. CAPACITOR VOLTAGE AND INSTANTANEOUS POWER
WAVEFORM
Architecture of single stage grid-connected PV system is
shown in Figure 1. In this figure, p
PV
is the output power of
PV module, p
c
is the filtering capacitor's power, and p
inv
and p
o
are the inverter's input and output power, respectively. If the
inverter losses are ignored, both are approximately equal.
According to instantaneous power balance:

c pv inv pv o
p p p p p = =
1
The inverters output power p
o
is calculated by:

2
sin , 100
o o
p p t e e t = =
2

o
p is the peak output power of the inverter.
From equation (2) it can be seen that the inverters output
power p
o
has a large ripple in the DC component, while the
PV modules output power is approximately a constant DC
flow. Between the PV module and the inverter, a capacitor
with large enough capacity is necessary to achieve power
decoupling between both sides. In the single stage grid-
connected inverter system, the capacitor voltage u
c
is equal to
the output voltage of the PV module. The slope of the
capacitor voltage is decided by the power flow direction in the
capacitor. From figure 2, equations (1) and (2), the time
domain relationship of the voltage and power of the PV
module can be obtained, as shown in Figure 3. By analyzing
these elements, the graph area formed by p
inv
and p
PV
waveforms reflects the power coupling in the system, while
the slope of the capacitors voltage u
c,
reflects the systems
operating zone, such as will be demonstrated in the next
section.
A. Power coupling relationship analysis
( ) t t e
p
0
0
c
u
pv
p
inv
p
1 1
( ) t o
2 2
( ) t o ( ) t
3 3
( ) t o
4 4
( ) t o
( ) t t e
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
N
1
L
2
L
1
C
2
C
I
S
II
S
Figure3. The waveform of the capacitor voltage and instantaneous power
In figure 3, N
1
, N
2
and N
3
are the intersection points
between the PV modules output power p
PV
and the inverters
output power p
o
. L1 and L2 are the subsection of the p
PV
waveform between N1 to N2 and N2 to N3, respectively. C1
and C2 are the subsections between N1 to N2 and N2 to N3 of
the p
inv
waveform, respectively. S
I
is the area surrounded by
the C
1
and L
1
lines and S
II
is the area enclosed by the C
2
and L
2
lines.
The S
I
area shows that the inverters output power is
greater than the PV modules output power, so the capacitor
discharges, and its voltage u
c
is decreasing. S
II
shows that the
inverters output power is less than the PV modules output
power, so the capacitor is charging, and its voltage u
c
is
increasing. If the area S
I
is equal to S
II
, the stable operating
point is reached, the net power flow of the capacitor is zero
over one cycle of the grids power waveform. In that case, the
inverters output power and the PV module output power, over
one cycle, are decoupled.
B. Monotonic relationship analysis
When the system is working in zone A, p
PV
is rising with
the increase in u
c
, while in zone B, p
PV
and u
c
are inversely
proportional. If the system is working in zone M,
corresponding to the N
1
to N
2
and N
2
to N
3
segments of Figure
3, the waveform is no longer monotonic, each section is
convex, and the limit points on these sections correspond to
the MPP. As the PV powers waveform is approximately
symmetric in the M region, the N
1
to N
2
and N
2
to N
3
segments
of the waveform are also symmetric in the time domain.
Therefore, according to the relationship between the p-t and u-
t curves, we can determine which region the system is
operating in.
From the above analysis, the peak/bottom points of the
capacitor voltage waveform correspond to the intersection
points of the PV module and inverter output power waveforms.
The angles of the intersection at these points reflect not only
the systems operating region but also, whether the capacitors
2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) 961

power is decoupled or not, meaning that the system is either
operating in the stable or unstable point.
In Figure 3,
1
o
is the corresponding angle at t1 and
2
o
is
the corresponding angle at t2. When the systemis in the linear
region (zone A or B), fromt
1
to t
2
, the power variation is given
by:

2 2
2 1
(sin sin )
o
p p o o A =
3
The capacitors voltage u
c
decreases monotonically if the
inverters output power is more than the PV modules output
power, corresponding to the section between N
1
and N
2
in
Figure 3.
If the PV module is operating in zone A the output power
is decreasing monotonically, corresponding to the section N1
to N2 and 0 p A < ; whereas in Zone B, 0 p A > . Therefore, by
detecting the capacitors voltage behavior, the angles
1
o and
2
o of the slope change can be obtained. Furthermore,
we can determine if p A is negative or positive, which can
determine if the systems operating point is in region A or B.
In the M region, the PV modules power waveform is
approximately symmetrical, so
1 2
o o t + ~ , and p A is
approximately zero. In figure 4(c) the L
1
section is not
monotonic, because the system rolled over the MPP. So the L
1
section presents a convex shape.
Irrespective of which area the system is operating in, the p
c
changes direction at every intersection of the inverter and PV
modules output power waveform.
III. STABILITY AND DECOUPLING CONDITION ANALYSIS
By the analysis decribed below, near the MPP the system
shows a stable "variable structure sliding mode movement"
with a small swing. Therefore, the power decoupling in the M
zone constitutes a sufficient condition for stability of MPP.
A. Stability Analysis
In Figure 2, the system is assumed to be operating in the
stable point either at A
0
or B
0
. If there is a positive disturbance
on the inverters output power p
o
at A
0
point, this will lead to
reduction in voltage of the filtering capacitor. The PV modules
output power Ppv is correspondingly decreasing. The system
moves from the A
0
to A
1
; the decreasing of p
PV
means that the
capacitor is outputting power, thus u
c
further declines. The
process of u
c
and p
PV
decrease constitutes a positive feedback,
which will eventually lead to a system failure. If there is a
negative p
o
disturbance, u
c
will increase, the system will move
from the A
0
to A
2
and p
PV
will increase, this means that the
capacitor is absorbing energy. This movement will further
increase u
c
, which also constitutes a positive feedback. This
process will cause the system to go over the PV characteristic
maximum point. Zone A is the unstable region, therefore
operation in this area should be avoided.
At the B
0
point, if the inverters output power p
o
has a
positive disturbance, this will lead to a lower u
c
, which means
that p
PV
increases and the system moves from B
0
to B
2
. The
increasing of p
PV
means that the capacitor is absorbing energy,
therefore u
c
rises and the systems movement from the B
0
to
B
2
is suppressed automatically. Similarly, when there is a
negative disturbance in p
o
, the movement from B
0
to B
1
is also
suppressed and the system will move back to point B
0
. These
two processes are both are negative feedback processes,
therefore zone B is a stable region.
In the M zone, the system is in a specially stable state, i.e.
the system is oscillating between stable and unstable regions
due to the "variable structure sliding mode movement". The
systems variable structure is the first necessary condition for
sliding movement occurrence. Whether the system is moving
from the stable zone to unstable zone or the opposite situation
is occurring, the monotonic change of PV modules output
characteristics corresponds to the change of the systems
structure. Therefore, the MPP represents the variable structure
changing point. The second necessary condition is the polarity
change of the control law. When the intersection between the
inverter power waveform and the PV output power waveform
occurs, the polarity of the power flow changes, which
corresponds to the polarity change of the control law.
In that control mode, if the capacitors power is decoupled,
there will be no change in the voltage in a power cycle, the
system rolls over the relative maximum points of the PV
power waveform and then reversely slips back to the initial
point. Therefore, the MPPT issue will be transferred into
decoupling issues in the capacitors power after the system
enters into the M zone.
B. Analysis of power decoupling conditions
In Figure 3, if the system is operating either in zone A or B,
L
1
and L
2
are approximately straight lines. So C
1
and C
2
L
1
and L
2
can be, respectively, given by the following formulas:
( )
( )
( )
( )
2
1 1 2
2
2 2 1
1 2 1
1 1 2
1 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
: sin , ,
: sin , ,
: , ,
: , ,
( )
o
o
C p t t
C p t t
p p p p
L
p p p p
L
e e o o
e e o t o
o o o
o o o o
o o t o
o o o t o
e
e +

= e


= e +
+
(4)
From the integration below, S
I
and S
II
can be obtained:
2
1
2 2 2 2 1
2 1
2 1 2 1
2 2 2 1
2 1
sin ( ) (sin sin )
2
sin 2 sin 2

2 4
(sin sin )
2
I o o
o o
o
S p td t p
p p
p
o
o
o o
e e o o
o o o o
o o
o o

= +

=

+
)

(5)
962 2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA)

2 2 2 1
2 1
2 1 2 1
( )
(sin sin )
2
( ) sin 2 sin 2
( )
2 4
II o
o
S p
p
t o o
o o
t o o o o

= +

+
(6)
Through the analysis above, if power decoupling is required,
it is necessary to ensure that S
I
is equal to S
II
. If the S
I
is equal
to S
II
, the following can be obtained:
2 2
1 2
sin sin 1 o o + =
7
From equation (7) following conclusions can be derived: If
the system is operating in a stable mode, then
2 1
- / 2 o o t = . If
the system is operating in zone A, then
1 2
3
4 4
t t
o o > > ;
likewise, in zone B, then
1 2
3
4 4
t t
o o < < .
In the M zone L
1
, L
2
are not linear, the equations (4) to (7)
are an approximation, then we may let
1 2
3
= = -
4 4
t t
o o o o + ,
where o is a very small value.
( ) t t e
p
c
u
1 1
( ) t o
( ) t t e
2 2
( ) t o ( ) t
3 3
( ) t o
4 4
( ) t o
PV
p
inv
p
0
0
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
N
(a) A ZONE
( ) t t e
p
c
u
1 1
( ) t o
( ) t t e
2 2
( ) t o ( ) t
3 3
( ) t o
4 4
( ) t o
PV
p
inv
p
0
0
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
N
(b) B ZONE
( ) t t e
p
c
u
1 1
( ) t o
( ) t t e
2 2
( ) t o ( ) t
3 3
( ) t o
4 4
( ) t o
inv
p
pv
p
0
0
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
N
(c) M ZONE
Figure4. The waveform of the capacitors voltage and instantaneous
power in different area
IV. ACTIVE DECOUPLING FOR FAST MPPT
The purpose MPPT is to achieve maximum power
generation. Therefore, the MPPT algorithm needs to assess two
indicators: the time duration that the system takes to reach the
MPP and the amplitude variation of power or voltage when
having reached the MPP.
Based on the foregoing analysis, if there is power
decoupling of the capacitor at MPP, the "variable structure
sliding mode movement" is automatically implemented within
the system. However, if the system does not enter the M zone,
power decoupling is not necessary, since whether in zone A or
B, power decoupling means that the system is relatively stable
at that point. Particularly when the system has started from the
open circuit voltage, if the power decoupling occurs in zone B,
the progress to the M zone will be slow. The fast MPPT should
be able to track the PV modules output power to p
m
in the
quickest way, that also means the capacitor voltage, which is
equal to PV modules voltage, lowers to u
cm
in the same
manner. That is inturn equivalent to that the inverter outputs
maximum power. After rising to p
m
, if decoupling is introduced,
the systemis stablized which means that the systementers into
the "variable structure sliding mode movement" state.
In figure 4 either in zone A or B, the midpoint of the L
1
section is given by:

2 2
1 2 1 2
sin sin

2 2
m inv
p p
p p
o o + +
= =
8
If the system is decoupled, by using equation (7) and
equation (8), / 2
m inv
p p = is obtained. Therefore, if
2
inv m
p p
'
= is given as power reference in the next power
cycle, the decoupling can be approximatly achieved.
The decoupling method above is especially suitable for
system start-up and sharp radiation changes.
2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) 963

V. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
An experimental prototype was designed with the
following parameters:
Tab. 1 Parameters of the experimental prototype
Parameter Value
Rated Power/VA 200
Input Voltage/V 30
Filtering Capacitor/uF 8800
Switching Frequency/kHz 151.2~448.9
Transformers Winding ratio 16
Primary Inductance/uH 6
Output Inductance/uH 600
An in-house PV simulator was used to simulate the PV
panels output characteristic. As the key issue in this paper is to
further investigate the systems dynamic performance,
differnent MPPT algorithms can be tested. The perturb and
observe (P&O) method is evaluated here.
Uc:10V/div
iinv:0.5A/div
t:400ms/div
(a) MPPT without decoupling control
Uc:10V/div
iinv:0.5A/div
t:400ms/div
(b) MPPT with decoupling control
Uc:10V/div
iinv:0.5A/div
t:20ms/div
(c) Expanded waveform of graph b
Figure5. Start-up waveforms
Uc:10V/div
iinv:0.5A/div
t:40ms/div
(a) MPPT without decoupling control
Uc:10V/div
iinv:0.5A/div
t:40ms/div
(b) MPPT with decoupling control
Figure6. Waveforms when PV module output power changed
In figure (5) and (6), u
c
is the filtering capacitors voltage,
and i
inv
is the inverters output current waveform. From the
comparison of figure 5 (a) and (b), by adding the decoupling
algorithm, it can be seen that, the systems start-up time is
shorter than that without decoupling control. The start-up time
can be reduced approximately by half. From Figure 5 (c) it can
be seen that, by adding the decoupling algorithm, the system
starts at maximum power. When the capacitor voltage reaches
the maximum power point, the capacitors power coupling can
be removed within a power cycle, to ensure the system to stay
in M zone. Therefore, fast MPPT is achieved.
Figure 6 shows the experimental comparison of the
waveforms before and after adding decoupling control when
the power at MPP of the simulator drops from 160W to 90W.
Figure 6 (a) is the experiment waveform without decoupling
control. It can be seen that at the moment in which the power
drops abruptly, the system can not respond immediately in
order to track the power change, resulting in an abrupt input
voltage drop also. After this the voltage slowly rises again.
Figure 6 (b) is the experiment waveform with the decoupling
control. At sharp change in PV module characteristics, the
system can stabilize the capacitors voltage within a single
cycle. Therefore the system is safe from a voltage collapse.
Fast tracking can be achieved and the stability of the
systems performance can be ensured from the above analysis.
The experimental waveforms show the validity of the proposed
decoupling control method.
VI. CONCLUSION
By analyzing the power coupling relationship between the
single stage grid-connected inverter, the PV module and
filtering capacitor, the adverse effects of the filtering
capacitors energy storage, in the process of maximum power
tracking, are highlighted. Through theoretical analysis, a
method for removing the power coupling of the filtering
capacitor and eliminating the adverse effects on the maxi mum
964 2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA)

power tracking, based on the regulation of the change in the
filtering capacitor voltage, was presented. The proposed
method can eliminate the coupling relationship of the filtering
capacitor in a single power cycle. The method can improve the
dynamic performance of the MPPT. The principle of active
decoupling presented in this paper, can be combined with
different MPPT methods in order to optimize the maximum
power tracking process.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank the strong support from
INVOLAR Co. (Shanghai), and to express heartfelt gratitude to
Prof. Yan Xing, Dr. Li Zhang and Dr. Hongfei Wu from the
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, for
providing valuable discussions and materials.
REFERENCES
[1] Satoshi Yatsuki, Keji Wada and Toshihisa Shimizu, A novel AC
photovoltaic module system based on the impedance-admittance
conversion theory, Proc. of IEEE Power Electronics Specialists
Conference, 2001, pp.2191-2196.
[2] Rodriguez C, and Amaratunga G A J, Long-lifetime power inverter for
photovoltaic AC modules, IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics,
vol.7, 2008, pp. 2593-2601.
[3] Kyritsis A C, Tatakis E C and Papanikolaou N P, Optimum design of
the current-source flyback inverter for decentralized grid-connected
photovoltaic systems, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol.1,
2008, pp281-193
[4] Toshihisa Shimizu, Keiji Wada and Naoki Nakamura, Flyback-type
single-phase utility interactive inverter with power pulsation decoupling
on the DC input for an AC photovoltaic module system, IEEE
Transactions On Power Electronics, vol.5, 2006, pp.1264-1272.
[5] N. Kasa, T. Iida and L. Chen, Flyback inverter controlled by sensorless
current MPPT for photovoltaic power system, IEEE Transactions
onindustry electronics, vol.4, 2005, pp.1145-1152.
[6] Martina Calais and Hartmut Hinz, A ripple-based maximum power
point tracking algorithm for a single-phase, grid-connected photovoltaic
system, Solar Egergy, vol.5, 1998, pp.277-232.
[7] Libo Wu, Zhengming Zhao and Jianzhen Liu, Maximum power point
tracking algorithm stability study for single stage type photovoltaic grid-
connected generation system, Chinese Journal of Mechanical
Engineering, vol.6, 2006, pp.73-77.
[8] Bangyi n Liu, Shanxu Duan and Yong Kang, Double power
perturbation analysis and suppression for a single-phase single stage
photovoltaic grid-connected generation system, Journal of solar energy,
vol.4, 2008, pp.407-411.
[9] Yan Cui, Bing huang and Dayong Li, comparison study of MPPT
control algorithm for solar photovoltaic systems, Journal of solar
energy, vol.6, 2006, pp.535-539.
[10] Haizhu Yang and Xinmin Jin, Maximum power tracking problem in
grid-connected photovoltaic inverters based on the DSP control ,
Journal of solar energy, vol.6, 2005, pp.761-766.
[11] Yongjun Liu, Pin Wan and Donghai Wang, Application of self-
adaptive MPPT fuzzy algorithm for photovoltaic systems, Journal of
solar energy, vol.6, 2008, pp.658-662.
[12] Genshen Zhao, Qingzhang Wang and Shengzhi xu, The principle of
maximum power point tracking and study of the realization method,
Journal of solar energy, vol.10, 2006, pp.997-1001.
[13] T. Esram and P. L. Chapman, Comparison of photovoltaic array
maximum power point tracking techniques, IEEE Transactions on
energy conversion, vol.2, 2007, pp. 439-449.
2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) 965