27/12/2013

Appendicitis

Today News Reference Education Log Out My Account W Farik Discussion

Appendicitis
Author: Sandy Craig, MD; Chief Editor: Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP more... Updated: Dec 16, 2013

Practice Essentials
Appendicitis is defined as an inflammation of the inner lining of the vermiform appendix that spreads to its other parts. Despite diagnostic and therapeutic advancement in medicine, appendicitis remains a clinical emergency and is one of the more common causes of acute abdominal pain.

Essential update: Ultrasound comparable to CT scan for detecting appendicitis in children

A recent retrospective study of 804 pediatric patients with surgically proven appendicitis indicates that using ultrasound as the first diagnostic imaging technique results in comparable outcomes to those seen with computed tomography (CT) scanning, while exposing children to less radiation and not increasing the length of hospital stay.
[1, 2]

During the 2005-2011 study period, a moderate downward trend in the percentage of patients undergoing CT each year was observed (, 0.32; P < .01), while there was a moderate upward trend in the percentage of patients who first had ultrasound (, 0.44; P < .01). The percentage of patients who had only ultrasound imaging before surgery increased moderately during the study period (, 0.33; P < .01). Use of ultrasound as the first imaging test increased from 33% at the beginning of the study to nearly 90% at the end, while use of CT scan as the first and only diagnostic test fell from 43% to less than 10%. No significant increase in the proportion of patients with complicated appendicitis or in the median hospital length of stay was seen during the study.[1, 2]

Signs and symptoms

The clinical presentation of appendicitis is notoriously inconsistent. The classic history of anorexia and periumbilical pain followed by nausea, right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain, and vomiting occurs in only 50% of cases. Features include the following: Abdominal pain: Most common symptom Nausea: 61-92% of patients Anorexia: 74-78% of patients Vomiting: Nearly always follows the onset of pain; vomiting that precedes pain suggests intestinal obstruction Diarrhea or constipation: As many as 18% of patients Features of the abdominal pain are as follows: Typically begins as periumbilical or epigastric pain, then migrates to the RLQ[3] Patients usually lie down, flex their hips, and draw their knees up to reduce movements and to avoid worsening their pain
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall 1/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

The duration of symptoms is less than 48 hours in approximately 80% of adults but tends to be longer in elderly persons and in those with perforation. Physical examination findings include the following: Rebound tenderness, pain on percussion, rigidity, and guarding: Most specific finding RLQ tenderness: Present in 96% of patients, but nonspecific Left lower quadrant (LLQ) tenderness: May be the major manifestation in patients with situs inversus or in patients with a lengthy appendix that extends into the LLQ Male infants and children occasionally present with an inflamed hemiscrotum In pregnant women, RLQ pain and tenderness dominate in the first trimester, but in the latter half of pregnancy, right upper quadrant (RUQ) or right flank pain may occur The following accessory signs may be present in a minority of patients: Rovsing sign (RLQ pain with palpation of the LLQ): Suggests peritoneal irritation Obturator sign (RLQ pain with internal and external rotation of the flexed right hip): Suggests the inflamed appendix is located deep in the right hemipelvis Psoas sign (RLQ pain with extension of the right hip or with flexion of the right hip against resistance): Suggests that an inflamed appendix is located along the course of the right psoas muscle Dunphy sign (sharp pain in the RLQ elicited by a voluntary cough): Suggests localized peritonitis RLQ pain in response to percussion of a remote quadrant of the abdomen or to firm percussion of the patient's heel: Suggests peritoneal inflammation Markle sign (pain elicited in a certain area of the abdomen when the standing patient drops from standing on toes to the heels with a jarring landing): Has a sensitivity of 74% [4] See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis
The following laboratory tests do not have findings specific for appendicitis, but they may be helpful to confirm diagnosis in patients with an atypical presentation: CBC C-reactive protein (CRP) Liver and pancreatic function tests Urinalysis (for differentiating appendicitis from urinary tract conditions) Urinary beta-hCG (for differentiating appendicitis from early ectopic pregnancy in women of childbearing age) Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) CBC WBC >10,500 cells/L: 80-85% of adults with appendicitis Neutrophilia >75-78% of patients Less than 4% of patients with appendicitis have a WBC count less than 10,500 cells/L and neutrophilia less than 75% In infants and elderly patients, a WBC count is especially unreliable because these patients may not mount a normal response to infection. In pregnant women, the physiologic leukocytosis renders the CBC count useless for the diagnosis of appendicitis. C-reactive protein CRP levels >1 mg/dL are common in patients with appendicitis Very high levels of CRP in patients with appendicitis indicate gangrenous evolution of the disease, especially if it is associated with leukocytosis and neutrophilia In adults who have had symptoms for longer than 24 hours, a normal CRP level has a negative predictive value of 97-100% for appendicitis [5, 6, 7]
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall 2/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

Urinary 5-HIAA HIAA levels increase significantly in acute appendicitis and decrease when the inflammation shifts to necrosis of the appendix.[8] Therefore, such decrease could be an early warning sign of perforation of the appendix. CT scanning CT scanning with oral contrast medium or rectal Gastrografin enema has become the most important imaging study in the evaluation of patients with atypical presentations of appendicitis Low-dose abdominal CT may be preferable for diagnosing children and young adults in whom exposure to CT radiation is of particular concern[9] Ultrasonography Ultrasonography may offer a safer alternative as a primary diagnostic tool for appendicitis, with CT scanning used in those cases in which ultrasonograms are negative or inconclusive In pediatric patients, American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) clinical policy recommends ultrasonography for confirmation, but not exclusion, of acute appendicitis; to definitively exclude acute appendicitis, the ACEP recommends CT[10, 11] A healthy appendix usually cannot be viewed with ultrasonography; when appendicitis occurs, the ultrasonogram typically demonstrates a noncompressible tubular structure of 7-9 mm in diameter Vaginal ultrasonography alone or in combination with transabdominal scan may be useful to determine the diagnosis in women of childbearing age[12] Other imaging studies Kidneys-ureters-bladder radiographs: Insensitive, nonspecific, and not cost-effective Barium enema study: Has essentially no role in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis Radionuclide scanning: Localized uptake of tracer in the RLQ suggests appendiceal inflammation MRI: Useful in pregnant patients if graded compression ultrasonography is nondiagnostic See Workup for more detail.

Management
Emergency department care is as follows: Establish IV access and administer aggressive crystalloid therapy to patients with clinical signs of dehydration or septicemia Keep patients with suspected appendicitis NPO Administer parenteral analgesic and antiemetic as needed for patient comfort; no study has shown that analgesics adversely affect the accuracy of physical examination[13] Appendectomy remains the only curative treatment of appendicitis, but management of patients with an appendiceal mass can usually be divided into the following 3 treatment categories: Phlegmon or a small abscess: After IV antibiotic therapy, an interval appendectomy can be performed 4-6 weeks later Larger well-defined abscess: After percutaneous drainage with IV antibiotics is performed, the patient can be discharged with the catheter in place; interval appendectomy can be performed after the fistula is closed Multicompartmental abscess: These patients require early surgical drainage Antibiotics Antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered before every appendectomy Preoperative antibiotics should be administered in conjunction with the surgical consultant Broad-spectrum gram-negative and anaerobic coverage is indicated Cefotetan and cefoxitin seem to be the best choices of antibiotics In penicillin-allergic patients, carbapenems are a good option
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall 3/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

Pregnant patients should receive pregnancy category A or B antibiotics Antibiotic treatment may be stopped when the patient becomes afebrile and the WBC count normalizes See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image library

Sagittal graded compression transabdominal sonogram show s an acutely inflamed appendix. The tubular structure is noncompressible, lacks peristalsis, and measures greater than 6 mm in diameter. A thin rim of periappendiceal fluid is present.

Background
Appendicitis is defined as an inflammation of the inner lining of the vermiform appendix that spreads to its other parts. This condition is a common and urgent surgical illness with protean manifestations, generous overlap with other clinical syndromes, and significant morbidity, which increases with diagnostic delay (see Clinical Presentation). In fact, despite diagnostic and therapeutic advancement in medicine, appendicitis remains a clinical emergency and is one of the more common causes of acute abdominal pain. No single sign, symptom, or diagnostic test accurately confirms the diagnosis of appendiceal inflammation in all cases, and the classic history of anorexia and periumbilical pain followed by nausea, right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain, and vomiting occurs in only 50% of cases (see Clinical Presentation). Appendicitis may occur for several reasons, such as an infection of the appendix, but the most important factor is the obstruction of the appendiceal lumen (see Pathogenesis and Etiology). Left untreated, appendicitis has the potential for severe complications, including perforation or sepsis, and may even cause death (see Prognosis and Complications). However, the differential diagnosis of appendicitis is often a clinical challenge because appendicitis can mimic several abdominal conditions (see Diagnostic Considerations and Differentials).[14] Appendectomy remains the only curative treatment of appendicitis (see Treatment and Management). The surgeon's goals are to evaluate a relatively small population of patients referred for suspected appendicitis and to minimize the negative appendectomy rate without increasing the incidence of perforation. The emergency department (ED) clinician must evaluate the larger group of patients who present to the ED with abdominal pain of all etiologies with the goal of approaching 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis in a time-, cost-, and consultationefficient manner. Go to Pediatric Appendicitis for more information on this topic.

Anatomy
The appendix is a wormlike extension of the cecum and, for this reason, has been called the vermiform appendix. The average length of the appendix is 8-10 cm (ranging from 2-20 cm). The appendix appears during the fifth month of gestation, and several lymphoid follicles are scattered in its mucosa. Such follicles increase in number when individuals are aged 8-20 years. A normal appendix is seen below.

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall

4/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

Normal appendix; barium enema radiographic examination. A complete contrast-filled appendix is observed (arrow s), w hich effectively excludes the diagnosis of appendicitis.

The appendix is contained within the visceral peritoneum that forms the serosa, and its exterior layer is longitudinal and derived from the taenia coli; the deeper, interior muscle layer is circular. Beneath these layers lies the submucosal layer, which contains lymphoepithelial tissue. The mucosa consists of columnar epithelium with few glandular elements and neuroendocrine argentaffin cells. Taenia coli converge on the posteromedial area of the cecum, which is the site of the appendiceal base. The appendix runs into a serosal sheet of the peritoneum called the mesoappendix, within which courses the appendicular artery, which is derived from the ileocolic artery. Sometimes, an accessory appendicular artery (deriving from the posterior cecal artery) may be found.

Appendiceal vasculature
The vasculature of the appendix must be addressed to avoid intraoperative hemorrhages. The appendicular artery is contained within the mesenteric fold that arises from a peritoneal extension from the terminal ileum to the medial aspect of the cecum and appendix; it is a terminal branch of the ileocolic artery and runs adjacent to the appendicular wall. Venous drainage is via the ileocolic veins and the right colic vein into the portal vein; lymphatic drainage occurs via the ileocolic nodes along the course of the superior mesenteric artery to the celiac nodes and cisterna chyli.

Appendiceal location
The appendix has no fixed position. It originates 1.7-2.5 cm below the terminal ileum, either in a dorsomedial location (most common) from the cecal fundus, directly beside the ileal orifice, or as a funnel-shaped opening (23% of patients). The appendix has a retroperitoneal location in 65% of patients and may descend into the iliac fossa in 31%. In fact, many individuals may have an appendix located in the retroperitoneal space; in the pelvis; or behind the terminal ileum, cecum, ascending colon, or liver. Thus, the course of the appendix, the position of its tip, and the difference in appendiceal position considerably changes clinical findings, accounting for the nonspecific signs and symptoms of appendicitis.

Congenital appendiceal disorders

Appendiceal congenital disorders are extremely rare but occasionally reported (eg, agenesis, duplication, triplication).

Pathophysiology
Reportedly, appendicitis is caused by obstruction of the appendiceal lumen from a variety of causes (see Etiology). Independent of the etiology, obstruction is believed to cause an increase in pressure within the lumen. Such an increase is related to continuous secretion of fluids and mucus from the mucosa and the stagnation of this material. At the same time, intestinal bacteria within the appendix multiply, leading to the recruitment of white blood cells (see the image below) and the formation of pus and subsequent higher intraluminal pressure.

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall

5/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

Technetium-99m radionuclide scan of the abdomen show s focal uptake of labeled WBCs in the right low er quadrant consistent w ith acute appendicitis.

If appendiceal obstruction persists, intraluminal pressure rises ultimately above that of the appendiceal veins, leading to venous outflow obstruction. As a consequence, appendiceal wall ischemia begins, resulting in a loss of epithelial integrity and allowing bacterial invasion of the appendiceal wall. Within a few hours, this localized condition may worsen because of thrombosis of the appendicular artery and veins, leading to perforation and gangrene of the appendix. As this process continues, a periappendicular abscess or peritonitis may occur.

Etiology
Appendicitis is caused by obstruction of the appendiceal lumen. The most common causes of luminal obstruction include lymphoid hyperplasia secondary to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or infections (more common during childhood and in young adults), fecal stasis and fecaliths (more common in elderly patients), parasites (especially in Eastern countries), or, more rarely, foreign bodies and neoplasms. Fecaliths form when calcium salts and fecal debris become layered around a nidus of inspissated fecal material located within the appendix. Lymphoid hyperplasia is associated with various inflammatory and infectious disorders including Crohn disease, gastroenteritis, amebiasis, respiratory infections, measles, and mononucleosis. Obstruction of the appendiceal lumen has less commonly been associated with bacteria (Yersinia species, adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, actinomycosis, Mycobacteria species, Histoplasma species), parasites (eg, Schistosomes species, pinworms, Strongyloides stercoralis ), foreign material (eg, shotgun pellet, intrauterine device, tongue stud, activated charcoal), tuberculosis, and tumors.

Epidemiology
Appendicitis is one of the more common surgical emergencies, and it is one of the most common causes of abdominal pain. In the United States, 250,000 cases of appendicitis are reported annually, representing 1 million patient-days of admission. The incidence of acute appendicitis has been declining steadily since the late 1940s, and the current annual incidence is 10 cases per 100,000 population. Appendicitis occurs in 7% of the US population, with an incidence of 1.1 cases per 1000 people per year. Some familial predisposition exists. In Asian and African countries, the incidence of acute appendicitis is probably lower because of the dietary habits of the inhabitants of these geographic areas. The incidence of appendicitis is lower in cultures with a higher intake of dietary fiber. Dietary fiber is thought to decrease the viscosity of feces, decrease bowel transit time, and discourage formation of fecaliths, which predispose individuals to obstructions of the appendiceal lumen. In the last few years, a decrease in frequency of appendicitis in Western countries has been reported, which may be related to changes in dietary fiber intake. In fact, the higher incidence of appendicitis is believed to be related to poor fiber intake in such countries.

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall

6/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

There is a slight male preponderance of 3:2 in teenagers and young adults; in adults, the incidence of appendicitis is approximately 1.4 times greater in men than in women. The incidence of primary appendectomy is approximately equal in both sexes. The incidence of appendicitis gradually rises from birth, peaks in the late teen years, and gradually declines in the geriatric years. The mean age when appendicitis occurs in the pediatric population is 6-10 years. Lymphoid hyperplasia is observed more often among infants and adults and is responsible for the increased incidence of appendicitis in these age groups. Younger children have a higher rate of perforation, with reported rates of 50-85%. The median age at appendectomy is 22 years. Although rare, neonatal and even prenatal appendicitis have been reported. Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion in all age groups. Go to Pediatric Appendicitis for more information on this topic.

Prognosis
Acute appendicitis is the most common reason for emergency abdominal surgery. Appendectomy carries a complication rate of 4-15%, as well as associated costs and the discomfort of hospitalization and surgery. Therefore, the goal of the surgeon is to make an accurate diagnosis as early as possible. Delayed diagnosis and treatment account for much of the mortality and morbidity associated with appendicitis. The overall mortality rate of 0.2-0.8% is attributable to complications of the disease rather than to surgical intervention. The mortality rate in children ranges from 0.1% to 1%; in patients older than 70 years, the rate rises above 20%, primarily because of diagnostic and therapeutic delay. Appendiceal perforation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with nonperforating appendicitis. The mortality risk of acute but not gangrenous appendicitis is less than 0.1%, but the risk rises to 0.6% in gangrenous appendicitis. The rate of perforation varies from 16% to 40%, with a higher frequency occurring in younger age groups (40-57%) and in patients older than 50 years (55-70%), in whom misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are common. Complications occur in 1-5% of patients with appendicitis, and postoperative wound infections account for almost one third of the associated morbidity.

Patient Education
For patient education information, see eMedicineHealth's Esophagus, Stomach, and Intestine Center, as well as Appendicitis and Abdominal Pain in Adults.

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author Sandy Craig, MD Residency Program Director, Carolinas Medical Center; Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine Sandy Craig, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Coauthor(s) Lutfi Incesu, MD Professor, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine; Chief, Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis University Hospital, Turkey Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Caroline R Taylor, MD Associate Professor, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Chief, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System Caroline R Taylor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall 7/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Specialty Editor Board William Lober, MD, MS Associate Professor, Health Informatics and Global Health, Schools of Medicine, Nursing, and Public Health, University of Washington Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment Eugene Hardin, MD, FAAEM, FACEP Former Chair and Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science; Former Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Martin Luther King Jr/Drew Medical Center Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Eugene C Lin, MD Attending Radiologist, Teaching Coordinator for Cardiac Imaging, Radiology Residency Program, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Chief Editor Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP Professor of Emergency Medicine, Professor of Internal Medicine, Program Director for Emergency Medicine, Case Medical Center, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Thoracic Society, Arkansas Medical Society, New York Academy of Medicine, New York Academy of Sciences, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
1. Barclay L. Ultrasound, CT Comparable to Detect Appendicitis in Children. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/817370. Accessed December 9, 2013. 2. Le J, Kurian J, Cohen HW, Weinberg G, Scheinfeld MH. Do clinical outcomes suffer during transition to an ultrasound-first paradigm for the evaluation of acute appendicitis in children?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Dec 2013;201(6):1348-52. [Medline]. 3. Yeh B. Evidence-based emergency medicine/rational clinical examination abstract. Does this adult patient have appendicitis?. Ann Emerg Med. Sep 2008;52(3):301-3. [Medline]. 4. Markle GB 4th. Heel-drop jarring test for appendicitis. Arch Surg. Feb 1985;120(2):243. [Medline]. 5. Thimsen DA, Tong GK, Gruenberg JC. Prospective evaluation of C-reactive protein in patients suspected to have acute appendicitis. Am Surg. Jul 1989;55(7):466-8. [Medline]. 6. de Carvalho BR, Diogo-Filho A, Fernandes C, Barra CB. [Leukocyte count, C reactive protein, alpha-1
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall 8/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

acid glycoprotein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in acute appendicitis]. Arq Gastroenterol. Jan-Mar 2003;40(1):25-30. [Medline]. 7. Albu E, Miller BM, Choi Y, et al. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum. Jan 1994;37(1):49-51. [Medline]. 8. Bolandparvaz S, Vasei M, Owji AA, Ata-Ee N, Amin A, Daneshbod Y, et al. Urinary 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid as a test for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clin Biochem. Nov 2004;37(11):985-9. [Medline]. 9. Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, Kim S, Lee YJ, Kim KP, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. Apr 26 2012;366(17):1596-605. [Medline]. 10. Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, Thiessen ME, Weingart SD, Decker WW. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. Jan 2010;55(1):71-116. [Medline]. 11. National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC). Guideline summary: Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Rockville (MD). Available at http://guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=15598. Accessed November 18, 2013. 12. Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, Warnock N, Berbaum KS. Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging. Mar-Apr 1995;20(2):149-51. [Medline]. 13. Manterola C, Vial M, Moraga J, Astudillo P. Analgesia in patients with acute abdominal pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jan 19 2011;1:CD005660. [Medline]. 14. Karamanakos SN, Sdralis E, Panagiotopoulos S, Kehagias I. Laparoscopy in the emergency setting: a retrospective review of 540 patients with acute abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. Apr 2010;20(2):119-24. [Medline]. 15. Niwa H, Hiramatsu T. A rare presentation of appendiceal diverticulitis associated with pelvic pseudocyst. World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28 2008;14(8):1293-5. [Medline]. [Full Text]. 16. Place RC. Acute urinary retention in a 9-year-old child: an atypical presentation of acute appendicitis. J Emerg Med. Aug 2006;31(2):173-5. [Medline]. 17. Oto A, Ernst RD, Mileski WJ, Nishino TK, Le O, Wolfe GC, et al. Localization of appendix with MDCT and influence of findings on choice of appendectomy incision. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 2006;187(4):987-90. [Medline]. 18. Sedlak M, Wagner OJ, Wild B, Papagrigoriades S, Exadaktylos AK. Is there still a role for rectal examination in suspected appendicitis in adults?. Am J Emerg Med. Mar 2008;26(3):359-60. [Medline]. 19. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. May 1986;15(5):557-64. [Medline]. 20. [Best Evidence] Schneider C, Kharbanda A, Bachur R. Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort. Ann Emerg Med. Jun 2007;49(6):778-84, 784.e1. [Medline]. 21. Schneider C, Kharbanda A, Bachur R. Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort. Ann Emerg Med. Jun 2007;49(6):778-84, 784.e1. [Medline]. 22. Migraine S, Atri M, Bret PM, Lough JO, Hinchey JE. Spontaneously resolving acute appendicitis: clinical and sonographic documentation. Radiology. Oct 1997;205(1):55-8. [Medline]. 23. Cobben LP, de Van Otterloo AM, Puylaert JB. Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology. May 2000;215(2):349-52. [Medline]. 24. Dueholm S, Bagi P, Bud M. Laboratory aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A blinded, prospective
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall 9/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

trial concerning diagnostic value of leukocyte count, neutrophil differential count, and C-reactive protein. Dis Colon Rectum. Oct 1989;32(10):855-9. [Medline]. 25. Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Unalmiser S. Accuracy of serum C-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon's clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum. Dec 1995;38(12):1270-4. [Medline]. 26. Shakhatreh HS. The accuracy of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with that of clinical diagnosis. Med Arh. 2000;54(2):109-10. [Medline]. 27. Asfar S, Safar H, Khoursheed M, Dashti H, al-Bader A. Would measurement of C-reactive protein reduce the rate of negative exploration for acute appendicitis?. J R Coll Surg Edinb . Feb 2000;45(1):21-4. [Medline]. 28. Erkasap S, Ates E, Ustuner Z, Sahin A, Yilmaz S, Yasar B, et al. Diagnostic value of interleukin-6 and Creactive protein in acute appendicitis. Swiss Surg. 2000;6(4):169-72. [Medline]. 29. Gronroos JM, Gronroos P. Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. Apr 1999;86(4):501-4. [Medline]. 30. Ortega-Deballon P, Ruiz de Adana-Belbel JC, Hernandez-Matias A, Garcia-Septiem J, Moreno-Azcoita M. Usefulness of laboratory data in the management of right iliac fossa pain in adults. Dis Colon Rectum. Jul 2008;51(7):1093-9. [Medline]. 31. Gronroos JM. Is there a role for leukocyte and CRP measurements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly?. Maturitas . Mar 15 1999;31(3):255-8. [Medline]. 32. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, et al. Role of leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Am Surg. Apr 2005;71(4):344-7. [Medline]. 33. Gronroos JM. Do normal leucocyte count and C-reactive protein value exclude acute appendicitis in children?. Acta Paediatr. Jun 2001;90(6):649-51. [Medline]. 34. Stefanutti G, Ghirardo V, Gamba P. Inflammatory markers for acute appendicitis in children: are they helpful?. J Pediatr Surg. May 2007;42(5):773-6. [Medline]. 35. Mohammed AA, Daghman NA, Aboud SM, Oshibi HO. The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage in childhood appendicitis. Saudi Med J . Sep 2004;25(9):12125. [Medline]. 36. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. Jan-Feb 2006;76(1-2):71-4. [Medline]. 37. Tundidor Bermudez AM, Amado Dieguez JA, Montes de Oca Mastrapa JL. [Urological manifestations of acute appendicitis]. Arch Esp Urol. Apr 2005;58(3):207-12. [Medline]. 38. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg. Mar 1999;229(3):344-9. [Medline]. 39. McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surg. Oct 2005;71(10):803-8. [Medline]. 40. Harswick C, Uyenishi AA, Kordick MF, Chan SB. Clinical guidelines, computed tomography scan, and negative appendectomies: a case series. Am J Emerg Med. Jan 2006;24(1):68-72. [Medline]. 41. Frei SP, Bond WF, Bazuro RK, Richardson DM, Sierzega GM, Reed JF. Appendicitis outcomes with increasing computed tomographic scanning. Am J Emerg Med. Jan 2008;26(1):39-44. [Medline]. 42. Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med. Jun 21 2011;154(12):789-96. [Medline]. 43. Kepner AM, Bacasnot JV, Stahlman BA. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall 10/11

27/12/2013

Appendicitis

computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. May 23 2012;[Medline]. 44. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. Nov 29 2007;357(22):2277-84. [Medline]. 45. Zilbert NR, Stamell EF, Ezon I, Schlager A, Ginsburg HB, Nadler EP. Management and outcomes for children with acute appendicitis differ by hospital type: areas for improvement at public hospitals. Clin Pediatr (Phila). Jun 2009;48(5):499-504. [Medline]. 46. [Best Evidence] Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Beyene J, Schuh S, et al. US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis. Radiology. Oct 2006;241(1):8394. [Medline]. 47. Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J. MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 2004;183(3):671-5. [Medline]. 48. Thieme ME, Leeuwenburgh MM, Valdehueza ZD, Bouman DE, de Bruin IG, Schreurs WH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance of MRI in children with suspected appendicitis. Eur Radiol. Oct 19 2013;[Medline]. 49. Eriksson S, Granstrm L. Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. Feb 1995;82(2):166-9. [Medline]. 50. Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M, Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. Mar 2006;202(3):401-6. [Medline]. 51. Abou-Nukta F, Bakhos C, Arroyo K, Koo Y, Martin J, Reinhold R, et al. Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours. Arch Surg. May 2006;141(5):504-6; discussion 506-7. [Medline]. 52. [Guideline] Korndorffer JR Jr, Fellinger E, Reed W. SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc . Apr 2010;24(4):757-61. [Medline]. [Full Text]. 53. Wilasrusmee C, Sukrat B, McEvoy M, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy. Br J Surg. Nov 2012;99(11):1470-8. [Medline]. 54. Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL. Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg. Feb 2006;72(2):162-6. [Medline]. Medscape Reference 2011 WebMD, LLC

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/773895-overview#showall

11/11