Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Vol. 69 No. 12
April 20, 2014 Jumble of Indian politics Kuldip Nayar Role of academics in paradigm shift K. S. Chalam Be wary of tall claims Rajni Bakshi
Gandhiji and Indian Socialists -III
Landmark judgement
S. Viswam
The Supreme Court pronouncement classifying transgenders as the "third gender" was long overdue. Its arrival marks an important milestone in free Indias attempt to ensure equality for all its citizens in all spheres of social, economic, political and cultural activity. The judgement will be widely welcomed by human rights activists the world over as evidence of Indias commitment to the introduction of progressive laws, rules and regulations in furtherance of its liberal and forward-looking constitution. The transgenders of India have been victims of social discrimination and the community known by the generic term "hijras" endured social stigma for generations in a society which remained immune to their being treated as national outcasts. Thanks to their un-determined sexual status, they had to endure a variety of indignities. They were hitherto neither socially acceptable as legitimate members of the Indian society nor were their rights, privileges and entitlements legally defined. The judgement now legally accords them legal status as the third sex apart from the two recognized sexes of males and females. The Apex Court was disposing of a public interest litigation filed by the National Legal Services Authority pointing out that a large section of the population was deprived of the fundamental rights that were available to males and females whose legal and social status was well defined. Apart from the disability which a cruel nature imposes on the transgenders, the isolation and alienation by the society imposes an emotional and psychological hardship on them. The acceptance by the society, which will hopefully follow the implementation of the court verdict, will offer the community some solace. However, this process may be time-consuming since ingrained prejudices take a long time to get rid of. The significance and importance of the latest verdict becomes clear when the crucial issue facing the transgenders is posed in proper perspective. The rights of transgenders to the same set of privileges and rights enjoyed by other members of the society will be available to them from now onwards. The verdict will enable the society to assimilate into its fold members of the third sex who are now outcasts for all practical purposes and they have
Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay Kranta Darsi Lohia C. Upendranadh Education for Swaraj Manorama Savur (1927-2014)
Editor : G. G. Parikh Managing Editor : Guddi D-15, Ganesh Prasad, Naushir Bharucha Marg, Mumbai - 400 007.
Email : janataweekly@gmail.com
to live on the tender mercies of the society. Lakshmi Narayan Tripathi, a well-known face of the transgender community, is quoted in the media as stating: " Why can a transgender not become a political leader, doctor, police officer or even a safai karmachari? Why does he/ she have to beg on the streets and face discrimination? " Why, indeed? The courts observations are noteworthy. The verdict says that it is societys moral failure in its unwillingness to contain or embrace different gender identities. The courts directions on the enforcement of its verdict are to be welcomed since the problem of rehabilitating the transgenders is complicated and calls for a sympathetic and enlightened approach. The courts decision to recognize the transgenders as socially and economically backward sections paves the way for the community to secure economic and society security. They can compete with the two sexes to obtain jobs in accordance with their capabilities and talents. It is the governments responsibility now to open the doors of opportunity to the community by first offering them the means of education, and a jab at professional training for various types of employment. Once the social stigma fades, the transgenders will be as good (or bad) as the other two sexes in contributing to the economy instead of living on it as they do now. On its par, the society has to exert itself to bring pressure on the government to de-criminalise homosexuality and do away with section 377 of the IPC. This is a step also long overdue in order to ensure freedom of choice to all males and females (and now transgenders) to determine their own sexual
(Continued on Page 10)
would leave the field open to them. Religion has, no doubt, taken a back seat. Modis most virulent speeches skirt around Hindutva but do not mention it specifically because secularism has a general appeal. The fact is that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) is openly participating in canvassing although it claims to be a cultural organization. RSS chief Mohan Bahgwat sat in election committees selecting the BJP candidates. This is ominous for the future. My fear is that the religion will be increasingly mentioned with politics. True, no party is running down secularism, not even the BJP. The partys manifesto does not use secularism even once. Yet the BJP talks about the freedom struggle and does not write off the sacrifices of leaders like Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Abdul Ghaffar Khan. But the cat is out of the bag when it does not mention Nehru, the torch-bearer of independence struggle. What is disconcerting in the manifesto is that India will admit the persecuted Hindus from every clime and country. This is in line with the policy of Israel which says that it is a homeland of every Jew, who can walk in whenever he or she feels doing so. Against this stance of the BJP, it is not surprising to find the party supporting to Modis Man Friday, Amit Shah, who said in UP to take "revenge" in the Lok Sabha elections. He did not mention the word, Muslim, but everyone could infer what he meant was that they should be punished at the polls. The Samajwadi Partys Azam Khan, trying to be Muslims Modi, has had no shame in his attempt to communalize the armed forces. He has neither withdrawn his words nor is he apologizing. His remark that only Indian Muslim soldiers captured
the Kargil heights, not the Hindus, indicates his polluted thinking. He even does not know that it is the regiments which fight and they have soldiers of all communities. A regiment wins or loses, not soldiers of a particular community. Such persons, including Amit Shah, should have been disqualified from contesting the elections. Yet the Election Commission has preferred to impose a ban on them from making speeches in UP, the state to which the two belong. The punishment should have been more severe. The caste factor which has affected the electorate, in fact, is the sub-caste. Dalits have many castes and the creamy layer dictates the government. The upper castes have Marathas, Rajputs, Jats and so on. Today, the baradari (community) members of the same caste are negating the fair election in a democratic society. How effectively
we fight against the sub-caste menace will indicate whether we are really a democratic and pluralistic society. The manner in which the political parties compromise and conquer such malpractices will prove if democracy is really ingrained in us. The current Lok Sabha election gives little hope because the candidates are stopping at nothing to increase votes. The use of money, however difficult, can be tracked. Even religious appeals can be curbed. But the caste cannot be. I do not know how long it would take us to raise above all these considerations. Until we do so, we should remain democratic on paper, not in the way the Western democracies are. And what do we do about personal attacks and abuses which leaders of political parties are exchanging? This is another story to tell.
April 16th, 2014
Shri V. S. Sampath Chief Election Commissioner Election Commission of India, New Delhi Dear Shri Sampath, We wish to draw your attention to the report that agreement has been arrived at between the governments of India and France on the cost of power to be supplied by the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project (JNPP). It is now reliably learnt that the AREVA-NPCIL memorandum of understanding papers have been sent to the PMOs office for approval. We submit that the signing of any agreement between the governments in respect of the cost of power from the JNPP is a matter with major financial implications and repercussions which will impose a binding commitment on the nation to expenditure running into lakhs of crores of rupees. It is therefore necessary that the Government of India be directed not to enter into any such agreement without the prior clearance/approval of the Election Commission, till the new Government is formed. In view of the urgency of the matter, we request you to issue such direction immediately. With regards, Yours sincerely, Vivek Monteiro, Adwait Pednekar, Prakash Reddy, Arun Velaskar, Madhu Mohite for Konkan Bachao Samiti - Mumbai
that incorporate the aspirations of the majority of humanity would be subjected to disruption and disrepute. Nevertheless, the history of modern discourse is only a few hundred years and it would overcome the temporary miscarriage and ultimately triumph. The above overview of the process of paradigm shift is universal. There could be country specific frameworks. In this context, we might reflect on the recent debates conducted by known scholars on the development models in India. The PR establishments of some political parties have been popularising particular brands like that of a soap or toothpaste product, few months before the current election season. We should appreciate the professional role of PR firms that are interested in income and not in your ideology. They do their job for consideration. The problem is only with academics that claim scholarship but join the group that works for remuneration. Academics are free individuals or experts that do not bother about the consequences and only talk about the truth that they discovered. If this simple criterion is applied to some of our academics who publish and discourse on development model with blatant lies and statistics (that is termed lies, damn lies and statistics), how do we account for that? It is noticed in the media as part of general reportage that a particular state is advanced due to its innovative model and the leader should be emulated. This is fine. We can understand the journo who wants to be rich overnight through paid news. There are cases where the media companies have become superrich with the so-called unethical practices. Perhaps, this is the only institution in
a democratic system that is not amenable to any accountability but demands the same from every other party? But how can we reason out academics doing it? The data supported by experiences narrated and posted by scholars clearly show that Bihar, Tamilnadu, Odissa have performed better than most of the states during a period of one decade. But, academics particularly those who are branded as development economists and
aspiring to collect a Nobel, doing this devious exercise with manipulated and premeditated effort do not augur well for the profession. Academics irrespective of the ideological persuasions should condemn such unprofessional style that is disastrous for the credibility of scholars. They are unashamed of their findings and studies and boast of bringing a paradigm shift. Is it possible to bring a theoretical shift with political manoeuvring?
Manorama Savur
(1927-2014)
Dr. Manorama Savur was an exemplary teacher who mentored hundreds of students who opted for Masters and doctoral programmes for Sociology from Mumbai University. She taught for three decades in the sociology department and was influenced by Prof. A. R. Desai, a stalwart committed to Marxism. She had courage of conviction and freely and fearlessly expressed her views. In 1975 when the Emergency Rule was imposed, she vehemently and openly opposed it. She always had gracious smile that added charm to her beautiful persona. She was very helpful to her students and all those who came in contact with her. 1977 when University of Mumbai was throbbing with ideological debates, her room was an adda. She had an open door policy and students, scholars and academicians of different ideological moorings could have access to her. During 1980s, she introduced a paper on Sociology of Women in Mumbai University. Dr. Savur was not an ivory tower academician; she was down to earth and responded to unfolding sociopolitical reality with utmost zeal. She loved plants and when new campus of Mumbai University was established in Santacruz (E) in 1974, she took active part in planting saplings which have grown into giant trees over 40 years. Till her last days she fought to protect the trees. She was also an animal lover and till she retired, she always brought two chapatis for a dog in the university campus. Prof. Manorama Savurs areas of specialisation were environmental sociology, sociology of health and rural sociology. She retired as Professor and Head of the Department of Sociology, University of Mumbai in 1987. After her retirement, she became a volunteer of Womens Centre that provides institutional support to women survivors of violence. Her presence had a humanisng impact among fire-brand feminists. Even in her late sixties she would go to Womens Centre from her home by bus. Dr. Savurs research work was always on socially relevant issues. She edited archival material on trade union movement in India. Through her research she also exposed built-in weaknesses of the Employees State
Insurance Scheme in India, and compared its operation with that of similar schemes abroad. Prof. Manorama Savur never shied of arduous field work. Her painstaking effort for over one decade resulted in two extremely valuable volumes published in 2003 on the political economy of bamboo. This book "And the Bamboo Flowers in the Indian Forests: What did the Pulp and the Paper Industry Do? Vol. I & II, Manohar Publications, Delhi" was the outcome of a multi-sourced (archival, library and field based research) and interdisciplinary work to highlight the environmental and socio-economic implications on the forest dwellers and workers as a result of the paper and synthetic fibre industry and the policy concerning bamboo farming, from the colonial times to the present. She supported environmentally regenerative bamboo-use practices and was for a rational and scientific approach towards felling of bamboo. She opposed arbitrary and intensive use of bamboo by commercial vested interests that destroy forest lives and damage forest dwellers livelihoods. She declared, "To clearfell the bamboo forests in the Northeast would be an ecological disaster. Bamboo does have many uses for the local people - but let us not forget it is also the green gold of the forests." Prof. Manorama Savur and Prof. Indra Munshi coedited "Contradctions in Indian Society: Essays in Honour of Professor A.R. Desai" that was published by Rawat Publications. For last two decades, she managed to be active despite cancer and deteriorating health. She never discussed her pain but gave helpful advice to cope up with cancer to many cancer victims. She passed away on the same day as her ideologue Karl Marx i.e. 14th March, 2014. During her last days, she was helped by many friends in the Indian Army and she had rented a flat in Athashree, a society for senior citizens founded by Armymen in Pune. As per her last wish, her body was donated to Army Medical Hospital. This act of hers inspired all those who had gathered to pay their last respect to her after her death to take a pledge to donate their bodies.
-Vibhuti Patel
"Aap Ki Mumbai"
The following objectives, legislative and practical measures, and activities shall be part of the AAP Mumbai program at the national, state and city level aimed to establish equitable and stable governance for the growth and conservation of national and regional assets, that would allow for the full realization of the potential of each Mumbaikar: Institutions for Citizen Empowerment and Security