6!*I 37-%I8A 9:1 199 : ) +9: !D7 -!; DI")$7-"! A*A56"I" <I*A5 <$-/A%I=! I. THEORETICAL QUESTION 1. What is Discourse?

Answer: Discourse is the use of written or spoken text in social context. Discourse and text has interlocking definition. In a discourse, there must be . !laborate the difference between Actor and "ub#ect. Write down at least two examples. Actor is the logical sub#ect. It means it is as the doer of the action. $n the other hand, "ub#ect is the grammatical sub#ect. It is of which something is predicated. %he difference can be clearl& seen in passi'e sentences. !xamples: a. %he students "ub#ect b. %he materials "ub#ect were assigned will be gi'en some pro#ects b& the facult& Actor examples. b& the lecturers Actor this afternoon for the final assignment

(. Is %heme the same as "ub#ect? )larif& &our answer b& writing down at least Answer: *o, it isn+t. a. Actuall& %heme the director has been sick since two weeks ago. "ub#ect I "ub#ec t want to see

b. *ext meeting, %heme

the complete presentation

,. What is a -ange? Write down two examples. Answer: A -ange is the element that specifies the range or scope of the process. It can also be named for the process. !xamples: a. "he does a little acting. .-ange: /aterial0 acts1 b. %he audiences en#o&ed the performance. .-ange: /ental1 2. What is the difference between 3aratactic and 4&potactic 5ocution. Write down at least two examples.

Answer: 3aratactic 5ocution is the linguistic experience pro#ected as wording which is also known as >uoting. $n the other hand, 4&potactic 5ocution is the linguistic experience pro#ected as meaning which is also known as reporting. !xamples: a. I suggested, ?"he has to consider going to the part& with him@ .3aratactic 5ocution1 I suggested that she had to consider going to the part& with him. .4&potactic 5ocution1 b. %he shopkeeper alwa&s replied, ?I+m trul& sorr& for the incon'enience.@ .3aratactic 5ocution1 %he shopkeeper alwa&s replied that she was trul& sorr& for the incon'enience. .4&potactic 5ocution1

II. APPLICATION TEXT 1 1.

When Circumstance: Location: Temporal Conjunctive Adjunct the committe e Actor Subject M S received Process: Material did Finite ! I ! # receive Predicato r E Textual Function the report of the team Goal Complement Experiential Function Interpersonal Function

"

T$EME

they Carrier Subject M !

were Process: "elational: Attributive Finite "$EME

sad Attribute Complement "ESI!#E Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

because Circumstance: "eason Conjunctive Adjunct

the detainees Goal Subject " M ! E S I

were Process: Finite ! # E

inhumanly Circumstance: Manner Circumstantial Adjunt

treated Material Predicato r Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

"$EME

.
The press Actor publicized Process: Material !id Subject M T$EME Finite ! publici'e Predicato r the case Goal Complemen t in media Circumstance: Location:Spati al Circumstantial Adjunct in large scale Circumstance: Contin%enc& Circumstantial Adjunct Experiential Function Interperson al Function Textual Function

"ESI!#E "$EME

(.
The government agency Senser Subject M T$EME ! felt Process: Mental did Finie )eel Predicator that P(enomenon Complement Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

"ESI!#E "$EME

the press Actor Subject M

should supported have Process: Material Finite Predicator ! "$EME

the government mission. Goal Complement "ESI!#E Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

,.
There was Process: Existential Subject M T$EME Finite ! a long dispute Existent Complemen t between government and the press Circumstance: Location: Spatial Circumstantial Adjunct "ESI!#E "$EME Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

2.
As Cicumstantial: Cause "eason Conjunctive Adjunct Subje ct M " there Is Process: Existenti al Finite ! E S I no acceptable solution Existent Complement ! # E Textual Function to both sides Circumstantial:Locatio n Spatial Circumstantial Adjunct Experiential Function Interpersonal Function

T$EME

the case

remains

as a reference of conflict

between the government and the press

in democratic context

Attribut e Subject M

Process: "elational does Finite ! remain Predicato r

Attributive Complement

Circumstance:Locati on: Spatial

Circumstanc e: Contin%enc&

Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

Cicumstantial Adjunct "ESI!#E

"$EME

TEXT 2 1.
The committee's acceptance of the team's report on bad treatment of the detainees Carrier Subject M T$EME !

Resulted

in sadness Circumstanc e: Contin%enc& Circumstanti al Adjunct Experiential Function Interperson al Function Textual Function

Process:"elational !id Finite

result Predicator "ESI!#E "$EME

.
The press Actor Subject M T$EME publicized Process:Material did Finite ! publici'e Predicato r the bad treatment Goal Compleme nt in large scale Circumstance: Contin%enc& Circumstantial Adjunct Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

"ESI!#E "$EME

which Senser Subject M !

umiliated Process:Mental did $umiliate Predicato Finite r "$EME

the government agency P(enomenon Complement "ESI!#E

Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

(.

It Carrier Subject T$EME

was Process:"elational Identi)ication Finite M !

between the government and the press Circumstance: Attribute Location:Spatial Complement Circumstantial Adjunct "ESI!#E "$EME an apparent conflict

Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function

,.
The case Carrier Subject M T$EME ! has Remained as a public dispute Attribute Complement "ESI!#E "$EME since then Circumstance: Location:Tempor al Circumstantial Adjunct Experiential Function Interpersonal Function Textual Function in democratic context Circumstanc e: Contin%enc&

Process:"elational:Attributi ve Finite Predicator

and

has been used Process:Material

as a reference a conflict Circumstanc e: "ole Complement

between the government and the press Circumstance: Location: Spatial

Experiential Function

Conjunctiv e Adjunct

(as been Finite M !

used Predicato r " E Circumstantial Adjunct Interpersonal Function S I ! # E Textual Function

"$EME

LOGICAL FUNCTION TEXT 1 1. When the committee recei'ed the report of the team the& were sad because the detainees were inhumanl& treated. xA (Hypotactic Enhancement) . %he press publiciDed the case in media in large scale. 1 (Simple Clause) (. %he go'ernment agenc& felt that the press should ha'e supported the go'ernment mission. B (Hypotactic Extension) ,. %here was a long dispute between the go'ernment and the press. 1 (Simple Clause)
2. As there is no acceptable solution to both sides the case remains as the reference conflict between the go'ernment and the press in democratic context. xA B

xC

EA

(Hypotactic Enhancement)

TEXT 2 1. %he committee+s acceptance of the team+s report on bad treatment of the detainees resulted in sadness 1 (Simple Clause) . %he press publiciDed the bad treatment in large scale B (Hypotactic Elaboration) (. It was an apparent conflict between the go'ernment and the press. 1 (Simple Clause)
,. %he case has remained as a public dispute since then and has been used as a reference conflict between the go'ernment and the press in democratic context.

which humiliated the go'ernment agenc&. FA

1
(Paratactic Extension)

COMPARING DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES OF TWO TEXTS

EXPERIENTIAL FUNCTION 3rocess %&pe
T!"T # * . 2 3 / 4 6 P" CESS T+PE Material Mental "elational ,e(avioral 5erbal Existential T TAL *#M,E" / . 2 1 1 2 7 //0/1..0.1221 1 22.11-

T!"T $ * . 2 3 / 4 6 P" CESS T+PE Material Mental "elational ,e(avioral 5erbal Existential T TAL *#M,E" 2 . 3 1 1 1 6 3303.608 6606 1 1 1 .11-

)ircumstance %&pe
T!"T #

* . 2 3 / 4 6 8 9 7

CI"C#MSTA*CE T+PE Extent Location Manner Cause Contin%enc& "ole Accompaniment Matter An%le T TAL

*#M,E " 1 4 . 2 2 1 1 1 1 .1

1 41.121211 1 1 1 .11-

T!"T $ * . 2 3 / 4 6 8 9 7 CI"C#MSTA*CE T+PE Extent Location Manner Cause Contin%enc& "ole Accompaniment Matter An%le T TAL *#M,E" 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 6 1 411 1 411 1 1 1 .11-

INTERPERSONAL FUNCTION
* . 2 3

/ood %&pes
T!"T # M !S T+PE !eclarative Interro%ative Imperative T TAL *#M,E" 7 1 1 7 .111 1 .11-

* . 2 3

T!"T $ !S T+PE *#M,E" !eclarative 6 Interro%ative 1 Imperative 1 T TAL 6

.111 1 .11-

TEXTUAL FUNCTION
* . 2

%heme %&pes
T!"T # T$EMES T+PE Mar;ed Simple MA":E! Mar;ed Multiple #nmar;ed Simple #*MA":E! #nmar;ed Multiple T TAL *#M,E" 1 2 2 . 4 1 /1/121.11-

* . 2

T!"T $ T$EMES T+PE Mar;ed Simple MA":E! Mar;ed Multiple #nmar;ed Simple #*MA":E! #nmar;ed Multiple T TAL

*#M,E" 1 1 2 2 /

1 1 4141.11-

LOGICAL FUNCTION
*

%axis %&pes
T!"T # TA<IS T+PE Elaboration Extension Paratactic En(ancement Locution Idea Elaboration Extension $&potactic En(ancement Locution Idea T TAL *#M,E" 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 330366061 1 .11-

T!"T $ TA<IS T+PE Elaboration Extension Paratactic En(ancement Locution Idea Elaboration Extension $&potactic En(ancement Locution Idea T TAL

*#M,E" 1 . 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 2

1 411 1 1 411 1 1 1 .11-

A*A56"I": !xperientiall&, we can see that the texts are different. Gecause of the number of the clauses, the number of processes used in each text also different. In the first text there are H processes used, which are material, mental, relational and existential processes. While in the second one, there are onl& I processes falls to categories of material, mental and relational. In the second text, there is no existential process and there are ( relational process. %he difference is also clearl& seen in the material process, in the first text there are , processes while in the second one onl& procesess. "eeing the number of circumstances, there are 19 circumstances falls to categories of location, manner, cause, and contingenc&. While in the second one, there are I circumstances, namel& location, and contingenc&. Interpersonall&, we can see that the texts are similar. All of the sentences in these two texts are in declarati'e mood. %extuall&, we can see that the texts are different. In the second text, there is no marked theme because the sentences are all in unmarked theme. While in the first there are sentences with marked theme. 5ogicall&, we can that the texts are different. In the first text, there is no paratactic relation while in second text there is one paratactic relation. 4&potactic relation occurred in this two texts are also different. %here are h&potactic extension and enhancement relation in the first text, while in the second one there is onl& h&potactic elaboration relation.