0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
267 Ansichten10 Seiten
The document describes two buildings designed by Frank Lloyd Wright - the S.C. Johnson Wax Building in Racine, Wisconsin constructed from 1936-1939 and its Research Tower addition built eight years later. It focuses on the innovative structural systems used, notably the precast concrete columns in the main building designed without calculations to resemble flowers. The columns were criticized but withstood a public load test of over 12 tons as estimated by Wright. The cantilevered tower floors tapered outward like flower petals to distribute vertical and lateral loads to the central reinforced concrete core.
The document describes two buildings designed by Frank Lloyd Wright - the S.C. Johnson Wax Building in Racine, Wisconsin constructed from 1936-1939 and its Research Tower addition built eight years later. It focuses on the innovative structural systems used, notably the precast concrete columns in the main building designed without calculations to resemble flowers. The columns were criticized but withstood a public load test of over 12 tons as estimated by Wright. The cantilevered tower floors tapered outward like flower petals to distribute vertical and lateral loads to the central reinforced concrete core.
The document describes two buildings designed by Frank Lloyd Wright - the S.C. Johnson Wax Building in Racine, Wisconsin constructed from 1936-1939 and its Research Tower addition built eight years later. It focuses on the innovative structural systems used, notably the precast concrete columns in the main building designed without calculations to resemble flowers. The columns were criticized but withstood a public load test of over 12 tons as estimated by Wright. The cantilevered tower floors tapered outward like flower petals to distribute vertical and lateral loads to the central reinforced concrete core.
Structural Analysis The Great Workroom 8 Research Tower ARC 631 Fall 2002 Nicole Bienkowski, Nicholas Jung, Eddie Naestri, Reyna Nasters Wax Fax Architect: Frank Lloyd Wright Location: Racine, Wisconsin Construction Date: 1936-1939 8 19+7 Building Type: Office 8 Research Construction System: Pre-cast Concrete Brick The Great Workroom Research Tower 120' 2 0 0 ' Columns 20' O.C. +0' +0' The Great Workroom Wright designed this grid of columns to create a garden within the building. He used the metaphor of a flower in their design and description. These revolutionary columns were designed without any structural calculations. The stem and petal" system incorporated a tapering shaft, a hollow core, and expanded steel mesh. The concrete used cured with strengths over 7,000 psi. The column system acts like a continuous rigid frame structure hinged at the column foot. Each column supports +00 s.f. of roof load plus any additional live loads such as snow. Wright estimated that each would need to support 12 tons. 12 ton uniform load 9" diameter base 18'-6" diameter disc 2 5 '
c o l u m n
h e i g h t The innovative column design was not without strong criticism. The Wisconsin State Building Commission did not believe that the column would support 5 tons let alone the 12 tons called for on the plans. A public test was conducted. The Research Tower The research tower was the second phase of the project that started eight years after the administration building was complete. The tower is essentially a fourteen floor cantilevered building. The tower was taller than any building he had built to date"(Carter,33). As with the administration building, Wright considered the buildings to be organic architecture. He also compared the tower's structure to be flower like, consisting of a deep-root" stem and tapering petal" floor slabs. Central core: Fourteen foot wide Circulation, Services, Utilities Reinforced concrete walls 7"-10" thick Cantilevered floors: Forty foot wide Reinforced steel sheets and bars Hollow floor slabs for pipe work and conduit Pyrex glass tubing Plate glass inner wall Stone Brick Cantilevered floor vertical Loading Stepping pattern: distribute loads outside to inside Central core: receives greatest load Cantilevered floors: tapered and mimics stepping pattern load distribution 1 7 ' - 6 " 33 ' "petal" 3 5 ' - 0 " 40' "petal" 1 7 0 ' - 3 " 1+' Lateral Loading Free standing structure Foundation resists wind 8 earthquakes No formwork in stem" so concrete could bond with soil 19' stem" 3 5 ' - 0 " 1 7 0 ' - 3 " 1+' force force quake wind