Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
In previous decades, a regrettable
divorce has arisen between two currents
of theorizing and research about
knowledge and science: the Mannheimian
and Wittgensteinian traditions. The
radical impulse of the new social studies
of science in the early 1970s was initiated
not by followers of Mannheim, but by
Wittgensteinians such as Kuhn, Bloor and
Collins. This paper inquires whether this
Wittgensteinian program is not presently
running into difficulties that might be
resolved to some extent by reverting to a
more traditional and broader agenda of
research. A social theory of knowledge
(or social epistemology) along
Mannheimian lines would not only
reinstate the “magic triangle” of
epistemology, sociology, and ethics, and
hence revive the vexed problem of
“ideology critique,” but would also need
to reincorporate the social analysis of
science into a broader macrosocial theory
about the “knowledge society.”