Hold that hand for a while!

Master of deception!
The most spectacular find of all Sumerian Akkadian parallel worlds is the name for the hand.
It is the most bizarre name in Sumerian because its ideogram is very poorly represented as if
there is no relationship between the marker and the marked object. The cognate for [hand is
the ultimate proof that archaic Sumerian was created by a single author. !ot only he spoke
Akkadian but also all other Semitic tongues that surrounded him. "hat this author did not
predict was the fact that Sumerian mirrors by default Akkadian grammar. #bviously he tried
to hide the origin of the cognate [hand but he never predicted the advent of computers while
he manipulated both Sumerian and Akkadian.
It is surprising to find out that Sumerian ideogram [u functions and sounds the same as
Akkadian [a $determinative%relative pronoun&.
'any researchers complained that Sumerian has no clear cut grammar. That is true( Sumerian
looks like an agglutinative language but bears the hallmarks of Akkadian grammar.
Akkadian)
a $determinative%relative pronoun&
who( which( that* and +the one of( of+ as a relative pron.
,omparison with other Semitic languages )
-ebrew ) .e
kiri u /al [0A1 -#'A23 T# $456) #ld 7abylonian& wr. kiri
8
u /al
9
+to pay homage to+
Akk. lab:nu a appi
$kiri[nose ; u[hand ; /al[be&
kiri u tag [0A1 -#'A23 T# $<6) #ld 7abylonian& wr. kiri
8
u tag +to pay homage to+
Akk. lab:nu a appi
$kiri[nose ; u[hand ; tag[touch&
u gur [0I,= wr. u gur +to pick grapes+ Akk. >at:pu a kar:ni
$u[hand ; gur[turn& ? is an Akkadian abbreviated sentence a kar:ni
u @I ["@I!2 -A!AS wr. u @I +to wring the hands+ Akk. uteBulu
$u[hand ; @I[cry&
As we can see Sumerian phrase)[u @I is a rebus representation of Akkadian uteBulu
where rCl are allophones.
See also Akkadian e Dlu ) G. to bind( tie up Gt. to tie all round D ? 2 * to make
binding $contract& t. to link $hands& N. to be attached * to infect $illness&
0roto%Semitic) Esi$n&tF%
'eaning) flat hand with wrist
-ebrew) 07 EsGtF in ha%ssGtF Bthe distance between the tip of the thumb and that of the inde6
finger when held apart( or between the root of the thumb and the tip of the inde6 finger when
the former is leaning against the latterB [Ha IJJ.
,f. sDtF Bhandle* swinging the forefingerB [Ha IJ9
Syrian Aramaic) sGtF: BpalmusB [7rock 4KI
Arabic) sintF% Bpoignet( os >ui joint lBavant%bras aL la mainB [7= M MM<M
!otes) ,. S3' only.
,f. '-@ .DtF r Bmeasure( span between the end of the thumb and the forefingerB [H' 8IK*
related with %r to be treated as a suffi6ed element. #ne also wonders whether this word can be
compared to -7@ 07 stFr Bto strike sideways( slapB [Ha IJ8 and HNA stFr $aph& Bto strike with
the flat handB [Ha IJ8 to make another S3' root EsOtF$O&r% PQ EcOtF$O&r% Bflat hand( spanB.
The author of Sumerian language has been careful not to include in Akkadian glossary the
Semitic root)
EsitF%) flat hand with wrist ; Akkadian e Dlu) to bind( tie up ? Akk. uteBulu
I understood that Sumerian cognate [u stood for an Akakdian determinative [a when
suddenly I struck gold)
Akkadian
a-qti
[Reeding S ,ooking
bowl for washing hands
This cognate meant $of washing hands&. 7oth these parts have become the respective phonetic
values of the ideogram that stands for Sumerian and Akkadian.
Sumerian
U
u
u [-A!A.
u [-A!AT3 $
/e.
u&.
Akkadian)
Also kat
J
( >ad( >at( >ata( sagi
6
$U&.
It is one of the most interesting ideograms of Sumerian language because as we shall see in
the future the largest phonetic value of an ideogram becomes the basis of word allophones
marked by the same ideogram. It is one of the very few( or letUs say one of a kind ideogram
where the determinative becomes part of the phonetic value to create the largest phonetic
value of the ideogram. "hat I mean is that the author added the determiner of the word to the
phonetic value of the word to create the consonant link from one phonetic value to another as
the largest denominative in the ideogram.
Tet us see the demonstration)
The largest phonetic value of the ideogram is [
/e.
u where [
/e.
is the determiner of the word
[u

The phonetic transformations from one cognate to another is represented as the following)
=AT
J
( VAA( VAT( VATA( SA2I
W
$U& X [
Y3Z
U [ U where [=CV( [ZCS are allophones.
"ithout the help of computers it is impossible to arrive at such a conclusion. -ow Sumerians
achieved such accuracy with mud tablets( where phonetic values were identified as
pictograms rather than separate letters( remains a mystery.
7ut the story does not end there because one of Sumerian pictograms is actually an
abbreviation of Semitic cognate for the left hand. As we know the left hand was used to write
on a mud tablet. Akkadians used the right hand to write and the left hand to hold the mud
brick. "hat an ingenious idea\ #f course( Sumerian gods perceived the left hand as the
legitimate hand of their language( the written idiom.
0roto%Semitic) Esima l% PQ Ecima l%
'eaning) left $side( hand&
Akkadian) umDlu( umGlu Bleft side( left handB #7 on [,AA . 9KJ( [A-w M9JM.
The irregular %D%C%G% $instead of the e6pected E%:%& may be e6plained from the change
Esima l% [ E.imi l% [ umGl% $E%i% [ %u% near %m%&
Ngaritic) .m al Bdie( das TinkeB [Aist 8]J.
To be normalized as .iCuma l%
-ebrew) s m^$ &l Bleft side( leftB [=7 M889.
!ote %:% in s m:$ &lG BleftB $adj.& [ibid. M888( which is usually e6plained as a regular refle6
of E: in an unstressed position $versus %^% in s m^$ &l where E: is stressed&. It seems more
plausible( however( not to connect this discrepancy with accentual phenomena( but rather to
regard the adjective as derived after a different pattern $probably E,a,a,iyy%( _f. y m:nG
BrightB with %a%( which neither can go back directly to its presumed prototype y:mGn Bright
sideB&
Hudaic Aramaic) s m:l: Bleft sideB [Ha M]]9.
#rthographically also with both s and $ & `abcd ef gheidjke [Ha M<IM( [Sok <JM
Syrian Aramaic) s m:l: BsinistraB( adj. BsinisterB [7rock 45M
'odern Aramaic) -@T umala BlinksB [H -ert MII !ASS simlll Bleft hand( left sideB [Tser
]M45 ''!A sm:la BleftB [' '!A <]I
'andaic Aramaic) smal$a& Bleft $hand( arm( side&B [A' 889.
Also asmala( smala $with the E a% prefi6&
Arabic) .im:l% Bmain gaucheB [7= M M9J8( am:l% Bcotem gaucheB [ibid.
'ehri) saym l Bleft( left handB [H' 85]
Hibbali) siny l Bleft%hand( left $direction&B [HH 9<8( s mli( s ml t BleftB [ibid.
-arsusi) semmel Bleft( left%handB [H- M9]
So>otri) simmhil $semmhel( semmel& BgaucheB [TS 48] $also [SST TS M4J8* SST 4 IJ&
!otes) 0ostulating the succession E%a l% in the protoform is the only non%contradictory way to
e6plain ^ in -7@.
#n the possibility of suffi6ed E%l see Introduction* cf. A@7 a mat% Bcotem gaucheB [7= M
MMJI( SA7 s9 m B!orthB [SA M8] and HI7 sinn $a correct transcription is sinn( see [SST 9 94J&
BgaucheB >uoted in [TS K4 under immhel $influenced( according to Teslau( by inn BdroiteB( cf.
notes to EyamGno Eyam:n%( !o. &.
See metathesis with a meaning shift in A@7 a amal% Bvent du !ordB $also am al% do.&
[7= M M9J8 and 3SA) SA7 h%s9 ml Bbe northwardB [SA M8]( 'I! s9 ml%sM Bvers le nordB
[T' 5< $note s9m l%sM >uoted [ibid. 5K as a conte6tual form&.
!ote 73@7 Ea%z lmadF BleftB( Ez% yielding AR@AS Ec. "ith three identical root consonants
out of four( though in a metathetic order( and such specific meaning as BleftB( the S3' and
73@7 roots are very likely related* 73@7 %dF in Auslaut( though( remains une6plained $XEa%
z lma %t XE%cilma %t X metathetic Ecim al%t &.
[-olma 8) A==( -7@( A@7( S1@* [=7 M889) -7@( N2@( A==( A@'( A@7( 3SA*
[7rock 45M) S1@( A@7( -7@( A==* [TS 48]) S#V( 'SA( A@7( -7@( S1@( A==
!ow all Sumerian cognates make perfect sense)
Sumerian u* sum
<
* u%6 +hand+ Akk. >:tu
where Sumerian sum
<
stands for Semitic root) umDlu
As we can see after this demonstration the author of Sumerian idiom has been playing with
Semitic derivatives in general not just with Akkadian alone. The Sumerian world must fit the
Akkadian world like parallel universes.
The truth of the matter is that the Sumerian author is only playing with the reader. Actually
Sumerian verbs reveal the partial rebus manifestation of Sumerian into Akkadian( as both
cognates complement each other. Tet us see the demonstration as sometimes the compekemt
is total and sometimes partial just to confuse the reader.
.u bala [,-A!23 $5<6) 3A IIIb( Tagash II( #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u bal +to change+
Akk. .upplu
$.u[hand ; bala[turn&
.u dag [A7A!A#! wr. .u dag +to cut off( abandon+ Akk. bat:>u
$.u[hand ; dag[demolish&
[M .u dag
.u du [,#'0T3T3 $8]K6) #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u du
J
+to complete( perfect* to be in
working order $of tools&+ Akk. .uklulu
$.u[hand ; du[push&
.u dub [0NTT #NT $K6) #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u dub
9
+to pull out+ Akk. nap:qu
$.u[hand ; dub[tremble&
[M .u dub
9
M distinct form attested* click to view forms table.
!. to pull out
o u du"
#
$
pu-%U-tum
!igga M5M* u du"
#
$
pu-.u-ru-um
!igga M59.
.u e [7T3SS $996) Nr III( #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u e
8
+to bless* to go out* to terrify+
Akk. waqr* pal:hu* kar:bu
$.u[hand ; e[leave&
.u gi [@30A1 wr. .u gi
4
+to repay* to return something to someone( settle an account+
Akk. gimillu turru* .ullumu
$.u[hand ; gi[turn&
.u gur [0I,= wr. .u gur +to pick grapes+ Akk. >at:pu .a kar:ni
$.u[hand ; gur[turn&
.u gur [@#TT N0 wr. .u gur +to wipe off* to roll up+ Akk. >ar:ru* >ebDru
$.u[hand ; gur[turn&
.u /ar [,A@@1 #NT $M]<6) #ld 7abylonian( unknown& wr. .u /ar* .u /a
9
%/a
9
+to carry out
$a task&+ Akk. gam:lu
$.u[hand ; /ar[place&
.u huz [7N@! $46) #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u hu%uz +to burn+ Akk. .shuzu
$.u[hand ; huz[cvve&
huz [,OO3 wr. hu%uz +$compound verb verbal element&+
See .u huz[burn.
[M hu%uz
It is an ideogram created to complement Sumerian with Akkadian idiom.
.u kar [S0A@3 $I6) #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u kar +to spare+ Akk. .szubu
$.u[hand ; kar[flee&
.u la [A3RIT3 wr. .u la
9
+to defile+ Akk. luBr* lupputu
$.u[hand ; la[hang&
.u la [0A@AT1t3 wr. .u la
9
+to paralyze+ Akk. eqDlu* kasr
$.u[hand ; la[hang&
.u ni/in ['A=3 A @#N!A T@I0 $8J6) #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u ni/in
9
* .u ni/in +to make a
round trip+ Akk. sah:ru
$.u[hand ; ni/in[encircle&
.u @I ["@I!2 -A!AS wr. .u @I +to wring the hands+ Akk. .uteBulu
$.u[hand ; @I[cry&
.u si sa [0NT I! #@A3@ $M<6) #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u si sa
9
+to put in order+ Akk. .utD.uru
$.u[hand ; si[horn ; sa[e>ual&
.u sub [2AT-3@ N0 wr. .u su%ub +to gather up( to collect( to scrape together+ Akk. esDpu
$.u[hand ; sub[rub&
.u tubul ['IW $M6) #ld 7abylonian& wr. .u tu%bu%ul* .u tu%bu%ur +to mi6+ Akk. .ut:bulu
$.u[hand ; tubul[cvve&
tubul [,OO3 wr. tu%bu%ul +$compound verb verbal element&+
See .u tubul[mi6.
[M tu%bu%ul
It is an ideogram created to complement Sumerian with Akkadian idiom.
.u us [0NS- #03! wr. .u us
9
+to push open $a door&+ Akk. seBr
$.u[hand ; us[lean&
It is obvious that both Sumerian and Akkadian are created by the same author and Sumerian
verbs complement Akkadian verbs. Anyway Sumerian does not have a verb pattern which
makes it prone to suspicion that might by a trick language.
Sometimes this author loses his grip and shows that the word for hand in Akkadian takes the
same ending as the word hand in Sumerian( grammatically they are identical. @emember that
the word [.u in Sumerian derived from Akkadian [.a meaning [to( from and it always came
after the Akkadian noun >:tu [hand. 7ecause Sumerian words are in fact Akkadian
sentences) Akk. >:tu [hand [.a ; object [.a ; object where the subject precedes the
object and then it is ommited to erase any doubts that Sumerian is Akkadian in disguise.
Therefore the Sumerian e6pression)
u gur [0I,= wr. u gur +to pick grapes+ Akk. >at:pu a kar:ni
$u[hand ; gur[turn& ? is an Akkadian abbreviated sentence a kar:ni
This was the design of the secret author who was in a hurry to prove that he was a special
person so at the beginning he made some mistakes by copying Akkadian grammar.
The initial Sumerian was very much like Akkadian in structure because the author had no
time to hide his tracks. 1et( he never told the truth his fellow brothers. -e said to them that he
was a prophet and he could talk to gods in their language. -e had had a foretelling dream and
he was taught by gods a very special tongue. Sumerian is the invention of a single man. #ther
scribes were deeply confused and they tried to identify the cognate of [hand with other
Semitic words for hand through folk etymology.
Semitic scribes decided to link this cognates with another word)
TA2uZN
ti"ir
#
tibir [-A!A.
where the ideogram &AG stands for A''adian qatu (hand) plus the *u+. ideo,ra+ U
(hand)
In order to create)
tibir [-A!A $9K6) Nr III( #ld 7abylonian& wr. tibir* tibir
9
* tibir
4
* tibir
8
+hand* fist+
Akk. >:tu* rittu* upnu
See ha. tibir rah[slap the thigh.
[M tibir
[9 tibir
9
[8 tibir
4
[4 tibir
8
Therefore the cognate for hand has passed the formal test during which the Akkadian cognate
has been represented with a pictogram that has homonymy with the prime Sumerian
pictogram)
-ence
Sum. &AG-U $ *u+ U ? Akk. >atu vhandU
The best way to avoid being lost in the Sumerian labyrinth is to compare word clusters)
Akk.
u+.lu
gab [T3RT wr. gab
9
%bu* gab
9
+left $hand&+ Akk. .umDlu
u+eritu+
eme/ir [SN'3@IA! wr. eme%gi* eme%/ir
M<
+the Sumerian language+
Akk. .umeritum* .umerr
u+er/
eme/ir [SN'3@IA! wr. eme%gi* eme%/ir
M<
+the Sumerian language+
Akk. .umeritum* .umerr
It is clear that the words u+.lu C u+eritu+ C u+er/ are allophones( which means that
Sumerian was the language written on the left hand which was holding the tablet and the word
hand in Sumerian means left hand in Akkadian. Sumerian language liked chopping down
Akkadian words and create from them new cognates. -ence Sum. u* su+
0
* u%6 are rebus
representation of Akk. u+.lu C u+eritu+ C u+er/.
-owever the Akkadian scribe offers another e6planation for the phonetic value of the word
hand. "e must remember that Sumerian was a puzzle that offered several options to the same
>uestion. A Sumerian diagram works in that way that you can approach a solution from
different angles. It is an artificial language and functioned as such.
The apparent seal of the Sumerian scribe was the phonetic value SA2I from which the
phonetic value SN was obtained. If a scribe offers this e6planation than it must be true
because Sumerian language does not offer a logical etymology of a word. It is an artificial
language and the decision for creation phonetic values for words is completely arbitrary.
Therefore we must take the e6planation of a scribe at face value.
sagi ? SITA
8
.ZN.2A7A
sagi
6
? SITA
8
.2A7A
sagi
6
? ZN
*12A
3
qa
$see full listing&
sal
4
sal ["I!!#".
sila
3
sila [,NT.
sila [R@A2'3!T.
sila [ST@33T.
sila [N!IT.
Rull listing.
Also >r( ga
<
( ka
4
( sala
4
( sil
8
( .al
9
.
sila [ST@33T $9856) 3A IIIb( #ld Akkadian( Nr III( #ld 7abylonian( 'iddle 7abylonian&
wr. sila* sila
3
+street+ Akk. squ
[1] sila
[2] sila
8
5 distinct forms attested* click to view forms table.
1. street (238x/100%)
o T3WCNr IIIC!ippur
si-la
sila = u-lu-u
2
-um 07S ]<( M8K [#72T WI iv MKB. [[sila]] = si-
la = TAR = su
2
-u
2
-qum #7 Aa MI5)M* [[sila]] = = = u-lu-um#7 Aa MI5)9. 3TAC#ld
AkkadianCTagash ku
3
sila-ta e
3
-a 7' ]95J54 9. 3TAC#ld AkkadianC!ippur ku
3
sila-
a gal
2
-la #S0 9( ]K5 M<* e sila-a gal
2
-la #S0 9( ]KI I* ur
5
-e
3
sila-a a-gal
2
#S0 9(
]J] r i M9. 3TAC#ld AkkadianCSippar sila-a gal
2
-la-a!
3
,T <]( ]5] 9. sila-a "#$
%
-
a AN,T M( MJM M* i&
2
-tak
'
ig
2
-ka
(
ak sila-a "#$
%
-a AN,T M( MJ5 8* sila-ta e
3
-
a AN,T M( K89 9. 1(ge
2
) 2(u) )(a) 2(&arig)3(&a
2
) gur sila-a gal
2
-la ASH ]9( MI
<K I* 5(*i) guru sila-a *a&
5
-&a [...]-ta ASH ]8( ]<4 ]8 r ii 8* 1(*i) i-+a
3
-ge-
si sila-a *a&
5
-&a 7erens ]4] M. sila-a!u-gal
2
&i
2
-*u
11
73 ]8CM( ]J] M* ku
3
sila-
a gal
2
-la !AT! ]M9 M* ku
3
sila-a gal
2
-la!AT! ]M9 8* 1/2(*i) !a-a ku
3
sila-
a gal
2
-a !AT! 8<< <* 2(u) la
2
1(*i) gi sila-agu&-&a !AT! 445
9. 5(*i) sila ka sag
10
5(*i) sila
3
i*a 5(*i)gi
2
[su!] AAS ]89
J* 1(ge u) 8(ge
2
) gur e ur
5
-ra sila gal
2
-la AAS ]5M 8* sila-agal
2
-la AAS M89
8. sila-a gal
2
-la 'O! ]8( 8M5 4* sila-a gal
2
-[la] N3T 8( MK84 9* u
3
kii&
3
ra-
a e sila-a gal
2
-la N3T 8( MJ5M 8* kii&
3
ra-a sila-a gal
2
-la 1#S ]4( 95I M. sila-
a "#$
%
-a AN,T M( 8<4 MM* sila-a gal
2
-la #rient MK( M]4 MK< I. 1(*i) sar e
2
*u
3
-
a *a sila #7 ,ontracts. pl. AJ no. 9I M9B. unknownC#ld 7abylonianCTell -ammam et%
Turkman [[sila]] = [si-la] = [TAR] = su-qumStudio -istoriae Ardens( 95I%9IM ii
I* [[sila]] = [...] = [,] = ri-bi-tum Studio -istoriae Ardens( 95I%9IM ii M]. [[sila]]
= TAR = su-[qum] 'ST ]I( M94%M8J i6 K]K* [[sila]] = ri-bi-tum 'ST ]I( M94%M8J i6
K]J. unknownC3A IIIbC2irsu 1(a-.) !a
*
e-ki sila *agal A0 ]48 o i 5*
*
e-
ki sila *agal A0 MIJ 9B* ge-+i sila *agal-e
3
gal
2
-la-&i A0 KM8 o iii I. unknownC#ld
AkkadianCunknown e sila-a gal
2
-la7I! ]5( 99M 4* i
3
sila-a gal
2
-la 7I! ]5( 84]
M. unknownCNr IIICArehem u la
2
-a sila-a "#$
%
-a 0rinceton M( ]MM 9* sila-a /a
3
-*a Ntah
]M 9* sila-a /a
3
-*a SAT 9( ]454 9* sila-a "#$
%
-aSAT 9( ]5KM K* sila-a /a
3
-*a SAT 8(
9]8< 8. unknownCNr IIIC2irsu 1(a-.) lu
2
-*igir-rasila-a *a&
5
-&a ASH MM( M9I <I
<* e-&i 2(ge u) 1(ge
2
) 1(u) 3(*i) )(*i) sila ASH MK( MK< 7' 5J4I4 o vi
9I* e ur
5
-ra sila-a gal
2
-la ASH M5( MKJ I o ii 5* e ur
5
-ra sila-a gal
2
-la ASH M5( MKJ I
o i K* 5(*i) sila
3
ka 5(*i) sila i*a 1(*i) i
3
i*-gur
2
7' 'essenger ]J5 9* sila-
a *a&
5
-&a-ta 0rinceton M( <J] M. la
2
-ia
3
sila-a gal
2
ASH MI( 99< J< 8* e gu&-&a sila-
a ur
'
'O! M<( 9<< o ii 94* sila-a gal
2
-la 'O! 9M( 848 r ii M8. unknownC#ld
7abylonianC!ippur ki [e
3
]-&i sila-*a 0al-la-e
3
SA#, 44( 8M MK.
o kur[enterT3WC'iddle 7abylonianC!ippur sila-ta kur
(
-ra 2ilgamesh II ]9M( ,7S M4MKJ
4. sila-ta ku
'
-ra u
'
1(u) 8(*i)-ka! AN,T M( 49J J* sila-ta ku
'
-ra u
'
2(u)5(*i)-
ka! AN,T 9( MJ] K* sila-ta ku
'
-ra u
'
2(u)-[ka!] 1#S ]4( 9MJ M]* sila-ta ku
'
-
rau
'
2(u) '(*i)-ka! 1#S ]4( 94J 4. unknownCNr IIICArehem sila-ta ku
'
-
ra u
'
2(u) 3(*i)-ka! SAT 8( MIMM K.
See) pe. dug sila gaz.
Akk. squ +street+.
cut [[tar ta%ar TA@ na%[ka%su%um
street
[[sila
si%la TA@ su
2
%u
2
%qum
street
[[sila
u%lu%um
"hat is the relationship between the word horn or fin,er and the word streetw It is not rocket
science to solve this puzzle. A street branches out the same as a horn or a finger. The name
street in Sumerian sila was a pun of the words si%la [finger%hang.
si [-#@! $9K96) 3A IIIa( 3A IIIb( #ld Akkadian( Tagash II( Nr III( 3arly #ld 7abylonian(
#ld 7abylonian( 'iddle 7abylonian( unknown& wr. si +horn* finger* fret+
Akk. qarnu* ubnu
See si e[sprout( si gu rah[blow the horn( si mu[sprout( si sa[straighten( .u si sa[put in
order.
[1]
la [-A!2 $M8II6) 3A IIIa( 3A IIIb( #ld Akkadian( Tagash II( Nr III( 3arly #ld 7abylonian(
#ld 7abylonian& wr. la
2
* la* lal
2
+to supervise( check* to weigh( weigh $out&( pay* to hang(
balance( suspend( be suspended* to show( display* to bind* binding( $yoke%&team* to press(
throttle* to winnow $grain&* to carry+ Akk. allu* hanqu* hiu* kam* kas;
imittu* kullumu* aqlu* uqalulu* zar
See a la[bind( gu la[embrace( /e. la[listen( /e. la[silent( /e.tug la[deaf( -I la[cover( igi
la[watch( igi tum la[spy( ki la[dig( ki la[fall to the ground( sa la[bind( sa la[sweep( .u
la[defile( .u la[paralyze( .u la
9
[to entrust( taka la[open( umbin la[scratch.
[1] la
9
[2] la
[3] lal
9
The diagram la ? hang is of a later date than the diagram finger. ,learly the
pictogram X .
,learly the phonetic value of Sumerian la +to weigh( pay( hang+ X Akkadian aqlu +to
weigh( pay+*
The only way of weighing the goods in ancient times was by hanging and then weighing them
at the same time.
2A
la
la [-A!2.
lala [0T3!T1.
lalamu [7NTT#,=S.
i'a
.ika [S-3@A.
Akkadian)
Also .ik
6
$TA&.
5learl6 the *u+erian co,nates i'a7 la deri8ed fro+ A''adian aqlu 9to wei,h7 pa69.
:"8iousl6 the scri"e chopped down the A''adian word to for+ *u+erian phonetic
8alues.
"e can also note that Sumerian pictogram X Sumerian pictogram just like X .
,learly the Sumerian scribe wanted to make a logical conncection between the name street
and the name finger.
si%la [ST@33T Akk. squ
la [-A!2 Akk. allu* kas; aqlu = .ik
6
$TA&.
U
u
.u [-A!A.
.u [-A!AT3 $
e
u&.
Akkadian)
Also kat
J
( >ad( >at( >ata( sagi
6
$ZN&.
According to Semitic scribes the phonetic value sagi
6
was abbreviated into ZN. The sign [
;

according to my research means applied phonetic value. "hy did the ideogram for hand get
this particular valuew The answer as usual comes from the name of a compound. The initial
name for hand was Akk. qtu.
"here did the value [sagi come fromw
sagi ? SITA
8
.ZN.2A7A
sagi
6
? SITA
8
.2A7A
sagi
6
? ZN
It apparantly comes from si%la [ST@33T Akk. squ
The Akkadian value squ [street was transferred the name of Akk. qtu [hand by means of
association( an arbitrary decision of a Semitic scribe who left clear fingerprints of his
enterprise and his intentions. The relations between street and finger is the manner a street
branches out and the association of the street and hand is by the means the word street was
formed in the first place.
In order to grasp the depth of deception perpetrated by Semitic scribes in the heart of
Akkadian empire we must understand that the fraud was committed in a grand scale. Tet me
demonstrate the phonetic switches from one group of Akkadian words to another in order to
create wide spread semantic destruction. Akkadian scribes worked switching not just words
alone but entire sentences from Akkadian to Sumerian.
.u [-A!A $9J5<6) 3A IIIa( 3A IIIb( 3bla( #ld Akkadian( Tagash II( Nr III( 3arly #ld
7abylonian( #ld 7abylonian( Mst millennium( unknown& wr. u* sum
5
* u-x +hand+
Akk. qtu
See a .u du[e>uip( kiri .u /al[pay homage to( kiri .u tag[pay homage to( sa/ .u du[bind( .u
bad[plunder( .u bad[take( .u bala[change( .u bar[release( .u dab[capture( .u
dag[abandon( .u dag[roam around( .u da/al tag[spread wide( .u de[carry( .u
dim[prudent( .u du[bind( .u du[complete( .u du[hold( .u dub[pull out( .u
dug[touch( .u dug[transform( .u e[bless( .u gi[repay( .u gi[repeat( .u gid[accept( .u
gid[e6amine( .u gid[play( .u gur[pick( .u gur[roll up( .u gur[wipe( .u /al[unmng( .u
/ar[carry out( .u hub[whirl( .u hulu[destroy( .u huz[burn( .u il[raise the hand( .u
kar[denigrate( .u kar[spare( .u la[defile(.u la[paralyze( .u la
9
[to entrust( .u
mu[enlarge( .u mu[pray( .u ni/in[make a round trip( .u pela[defile( .u pe.[e6pand( .u
rah[beat( .u @I[wring hands( .u rugu[oppose( .u saga[rub( .u si sa[put in order( .u
sil[immobilize( .u sub[gather up( .u sub[rub( .u sub ak[rub( .u sud[e6tend the
hand( .u .an.a.a[search(.u .um[entrust( .u .u.[overwhelm( .u tag[decorate( .u
tag[touch( .u tahab dug[soak( .u taka[send( .u te/[accept( .u tubul[mi6( .u
tutu[withstand( .u ur[erase( .u us[push open( .u us[send( .u zid /ar[bestow( .u
zig[raise the hand.
[1] .u
[2] sum
<
[3] .u%6
+ %] $9J5<6CM]]x&.
48 distinct forms attested* click to view forms table.
1. 0a* (2%85x/100%)
u e-e = gi-mi-il-lum u-u
2

u a-tal
2
= qa
2
-ta-am pe-te
ka-1u
10
u a!
3
-&ar = pi-ia wu-u-u-ur
gi
u a-ak
kur-gi
'
u ur
3
-ra
!ue

a-&a u e-ra T2-T2-34
[u] *u-&u-ul
u =
qa
2
-
tum

u =
gi
4
-
mi
-
lum

u =
e
-
mu
-
um

u =
bi
-
il
-
tum

u =
pi
-
lu
-
u
2

lu
2
i-u usaga
11
-a = a mu-pa-x-[...]
lu
2
u sa1 *ug
'
-ga = uz-zu-bu-u
2

lu
2
u &ar tag-ga = na-ka-rum
[lu
2
] u *u
10
-*u
10
-ur-0i = [...]
lu
2
u A ak = mu-[...]
lu
2
u ku*-ku*-ra
2
= ku-u- u
2
- u
2
-um
lu
2
te
2
u 5A-ra = a bu-u-tam ha-al-pu
u-1u
10

ig
2
u tak
'
-a-a!
)

iti ki-su
%
u su-ga-a
1(a-.) e
2
%(*i) gi u-a tak
'
-a-a!
)
gi u igi
2
gu la x
u-a &a-gi
u
*
aa-*a-a-u
u u&ur-ka!
u*u u ukur-ka!
u u&ur-ka!
1(&arig-.) u-a
u-a tak
'
-a-a!
)

2(a-.) ur
5
u-u se
3
-ga
u ge gal
2
-la!e
3(a-.) ur
5
u si
3
-ga
ara*
2
u-a
ge
tukul [sig
3
]-ge
1(a-.) ur
5
u ku si
3
-ga
1(a-.) guru u-a
u gar
3
-[...]
u /u
2
-ta
u-a
[x] x u !e [x]
i-gu-la u-a a&-si
2(a-.) ur
5
u u si
3
-ga
u!
2
x-e
3
&a u ti
u-a &i-si
u*u u
*
aa-*a-a-u
ku
3
-&i u-e-e a&-si
u-e-e a&-si
u-e-e a&-[si]
lugal-iti-*a u-e-e [a&-si]
ku
3
e
2
u-a gi
'
-a-ka!
u&ar-ra
u 0a-&a-lu
5
-ge
2
esi
2
a*a&
ki

a-e
3
sag-[*u]-&i [u ti&ir-ra] &i
2
-ra-a
3(u) kak-si-sa
2
u lugal
ur-e
2
-a-a 66u77u i!-!i-u-us
2

829:A$A; 2(a) e a!ar a&
2
ka 6u7 *u
8
-a
5(*i)a!ar a&
2
5A u *u
8
-[a 2(&arig)-ta]
5(ge
2
) 3(u) i*a i!-*u
8
-a u *i-*i 1(*i) 1/2(*i)-ta
[x]
uru*a
gur
x
(84.5#3) u &a-[...]
x ig
2
u u*u ga +a&ar 1(*i) tug
2
a-ga
2
x 1(*i) *ug ru-[...]
sa0ar u x-a
1(*i) u gu
'
x
[...] 1(&arig) *a&i iti <#8 u
A;-5#< u se
3
-ga
u ur-
*
43-x
u ti-ti-ka!
u 0a-&a-lu
5
-ge
2
esi
2
a*a&
ki

1(u) 1(*i) u lugal-kisal
1(ge u) %(ge
2
) 1(u) la
2
1(*i) kak-si-sa
2
u lugal
2(ge
2
) '(u) %(*i) kak-si-sa
2
ge u-0a-a-i u lugal
ig
2
u tak
'
-a ki !ar-tu-e
3

1(*i) sila
'
a!a u ti
u
3

ku
+a
3
-&ar
ku
A; u e-sir
2
-&i
u &a-a-ti-e
u
3
u e-sir
2
-e
3

u-i sa
2
&i
2
-[i&-*ug
'
-ga]
u lu
2
-
*
i-urta
[[u
2
]] = u-u
2
= 82
2
= qa
2
-tu-u
2

u ur
'
-ur
'
= u-u-um
u e-a-tak
'

u-a tak
'
-a-a!
)

kas ki-su
%
u su-ga
&il
3
A3 *a u &a*
3

1(a-.) u!-!a i-6e
2
7 !e u 3A=-ti
, u A3
ig-x u-a !u-i-ke
2


u-igi
2
kas i*a ki-su
%
u su
3
-ga
u *u
%
i*i!
u i-i
3
-li
2

u 0e
2
-&a-re
)

u i!-!i-u-[us
2
]
u 0e
2
-[&a-re
)
]
u-a
1(a)+a&ar u
ku
3
u la
2
-a-[ka!]
sag
ris
uru*u 3(a-.) gu
2
2(u) !a-a u
[...] u !e-sag
2

1(a-.) u-u
u tak
'
-a
u &a-a-&a
u
'
1(u)-a!
3
&a-ra-+al u &a-a-&a
esi
2
-e u &i
2
-&a
1(u) '(a) 2(&a
2
) u-ka
829:A$A; 1(u) '(a)2(&a
2
) u-ka
829:A$A; )(*i)
a
'
ur
5
use
3
-ga
829:A$A; ((*i)
a
'
ur
5
u se
3
-ga u-gi
'

1(u) 2(*i)
a
'
ur
5
u se
3
-ga
u *iri la
2
-ia
3
*u
11
-ga-gi-a
5A u *u
8
-a lugal-esag
2
-e
1(*i) a&
2
[...]-gi a u
*
e
3
-eri
11
-gal [>AR]-*a-0i
ki

1(*i) u a ig
2
+a&ar
829:A$A; 5(*i) u a&
2

829:A$A;1(*i) u gu
'
a&
2
-&a
u 0a-&ar-re
u i
3
-e-&a
+i!&ir
ki
-ta u gi&il&i
2
-i-ak
u )(*i)
'(&a
2
-.) u-a
['(&a
2
-.) u-a]
'(iku-.) u )(*i)
'(&a
2
-.) u-[a]

u 1(a-.) iti
[x] u-a
1(a-.) u-a
2(u-.) u-ru-u! u
[...] 2(a-.) a&rau
1(a-.) a&ra u 1(*i)-la
2

u )(a-.)-e
u 5(&a
2
) gu-&i-[x]
u 2(*i)
*
&a-&a
)
-&a-a-+i-ge
u 2(*i) u!-!a-a
u2(*i) a-!u-[...]
u 2(*i) i-a
3
-la
2

u 2(*i) *a-gu
!u a!ar gu
'
ga u )(*i)-e
3

u-a
u 2(*i) ge!e
2
-ga
2
-*a
u 2(*i) i-lu
5
-/a
u 2(u) 5(a)2(&arig) 2(&a
2
) '(*i) sila
3
e +i+
2
gur
1(&arig) u-a
u 5(*i) u-i
3
-li
2

u 5(&a
2
) &ur-!a-!a
u 5(&a
2
) a-gu-a
u 5(*i) sila
3
*a-[...]
u 5(*i) sila
3
[...]
u 5(*i) sila
3
a!-ri
2
-li
2

u5(*i) sila
3
u-&ar-tu!
u 5(*i) sila
3
a-a
u 3(*i)sila
3

*
aa-ka! !i
u 3(*i) sila
3
lu
2
-i!gir
'(*i) gi
2
ku
3
u x-a gu
2
8#= u-a
tu-ra u-e
18
-*ar u
1(*i) u-e
18
-*ar u
u-gu& u-e
18
-*ar u
[1(*i)] u-e
18
-*ar u
1(*i) u-e
18
-*ar u
1(*i) u-e
18
-*ar u
[...] u-e
18
-*ar u
1(a-.)u-a
ur-
*
T2 u 2(a-'5)
1(&arig-.) [u-a]
1(&arig-.) u-[a]
1(a-.) a&
2
2(*i) ge u
'(a-.) u 1/3(*i)
a
u-a
[x] u-a
u 2(&a
2
) 2(*i) lu
2
-e
2
-a
2(ge
2
) [...] u
u '(&a
2
) 1(*i) tug
2
gu-*u
u '(&a
2
) 1(*i) tug
2
ur-igar
gar

u '(&a
2
) 1(*i) tug
2
gu-*u
u-a
5(*i) sila
3
ig
2
-su!-a u-a
u
2
u 2(*i) lu
2
-
*
sue
u
2
u 2(*i) ge!e
2
-
*
sue
[...] guru u '(&a
2
)
o n bala[turn u 2(*i) &al
u 3(*i) &al
o n gi/[a6 u 2(a) gi
2

u 1(a) gi
2

o u a-i u a-[x]-*u&
u x
u x-ga
u sa1-[x]
u x-x
u [x]
u x [...]&al
[x-x-x] u-a
[x] kisalu [...]
x u x [x]
[x-x-x] u-a
u >2 [...]
u x [x]-ki
u x [...]
u &a-ti-[x]
[x] gu
2
u-a
'(a-.) ig
2
u x [...]
i!-e tak
'
-a u-ka [...]
1(*i) u*u x
?
u
?
x
?

u-!u [...]
u*u ;2 u x
[...] u
u i!-!i-[...]
[...] u x
[...] ;# u
'(u) 3(&a
2
) e
2
u [...]
[x] x u [...]
[x] u ;A< [x]
1(*i) u x [...] giri
3
[...]
u [...]
siskur
2
u [...]
[x] 5A u x<2
e
2
u [x]
*
ara
2
[x]
u-ir u [...]
u [...]
1(*i)
a
'
ur
5
[...] u >A [...]
[...] u [...]
[...]
ge
kiri
)

*
x-[...] u x [...]
x [...] u [x]
ga
2
-*a u-!e-au-a x
u 0a-&a-i-[...]
x x u [x] x x [x]
u x ig
2
x
tur u x [...]
[...] u [...]
u i-a-a-&ar-x-!a
u x [...]
1(iku-.) $A3
2
3(a-.) 2(&arig-.) lugal u 5A A;
u [...]
ur u [...]
ur u [x]
u x-x-tag
'

[...]u ur-[...]-!a
sag-&i u A; &i
2
-ra
u si-[...]
+i+
2
-&i 1(ge
2
) 2(*i) a-a
3
ge
kiri
)
u x
[...] 1(u) %(*i) 1/2(*i) [...] u [...] <2 [...] ki [...]u
2
[...] gal
2
[...] 1(*i)-e
3
[...]
2(u) '(*i) u*uiga u u
2
-x
a
'
ur
5
u x x
u [... x-
*]
e-lil
2
-la
2
x
a
2
u x-x-x
*
[ara
2
]-ka! u [...]
829:A$A; 1(*i) u [...]
u 23 [...]
ga
2
-*a [...] u 0a-[...]
1(*i)ge $A3
2
ur
3
u [...]
o ak[do u-a ak
u ak
lu
2
u-a ak = mu-a-li-lum
1(a) gu
2

ge
asal
2
u ak
1(a) gu
2

ge
asal
2
u ak
2(a) gu
2

ge
asal
2
u u-ak
a&gal-le u &i-ak
1(*i) u*u u ak lugal
o bad[open u &a*
2(a-.)2(&arig-.) u-ku
)
?
sa
?
u &a*-ra
2

gur u &e-a-a!
)

u-ku
)
sa u &a*-ra
2
-!e
sau &a*-!e
u-ku
)
sa u &a*-ra
2
-!e
o bala[turn sag u &ala ak-&i
u &alaak-*e
3

2(u) u
8
sila
'
ga u &ala ak
u
'
5(*i) !a
2
&a-al-la u
3
u &ala-a
1(u) e !u-a u&ala ak
u &ala-a
u &ala-a
[u] &al
gi u-a &ala-a
sa0ar u &ala-a
[x] u-lu u &ala ak
2(a) e gur +i+
2
a u &ala ak
gi u-a &ala-a
o bar[cvve u &ar-ra
u &ar
u i-e-&ar
sa1 u &ar-ra = re-e wu-u-ur-ti
o bar[outside .u.[cover u &ar u
2
-e
o dag[demolish u *ag
;#-"2 u*ag-ga
o dili[single u *ili
o dirig[e6cess u *irig
o dirig[e6cess du[build u *irig *u
3
-a .
o du[hold u *u
3
-*u
3

u *u
3
-a
o du[suitable =# /iri1 u *u
%

=# /iri1 u u-*u
%

u u-*u
%

[u e]-a-*u
%
1(a-.) !a
2
-gur
8
u *u
%
-a
2(*i)
ge
!ar-gi*
2
-*a u *u
%
-a
ge
gigir-a u *u
%
-a
*
*u!u-+i a&+u-ke
'
u *u
%
-a
ala
?

*?
u
?
-
*?
sue
?
u
?
*u
%
?
-*u
%
?
-*e
3
?

[...] u *u
%
-a sukkal !a0 tu-a
ge
gigir
*
i-gir
2
-su-ke
'
u &a-ra-a&-*u
%

!a
2
i-ke
'
u *u
%
-a
1(*i)
ge
*a-ak-si u *u
%

u *u
%
-a ge-0u-u! 1(*i)-ka!
1(*i) uru*a 0u-&u-u!
ge
ig u *u
%
-a
1(*i)
ge
gigir sag
10
!u-gi*
2
-ga!-!a u *u
%
-a
1(*i)
ge
gigir u *u
%
-a ga&
2
-sa
2
ki lu
2
-&a*a
3
*a

u*u
%
-a a*
)

ge gi-a u *u
%
x [x]
a
2
u *u
%
-a e-a x-x
u &a-ra-a&-*u
%

a
2
u *u
%
-a
u 0e
2
-e&-*u
%

e-&a u*u
%
-a
u *u
%
-a
ge
gu-+a 0al-&i 1(*i)-a-ka!
a
2
u *u
%
-a *u!u !uus lu
2
-
*
i-u&ur
1(a-.) gug
2
u *u
%
-a
1(a-.)
ge
>AR->A-*a u*u
%
-a
1(a-.) e
2
-&a-a
ku
a
3
-*u
3

ku
*u
8
u *u
%
-a
'(a-.) gu
'
-a/i-u
'
-*ul
5
u *u
%
-a
1(*i)
ge
!ar-gi*
2
-*a u *u
%
-a
gu
'
a/i-e u *u
%
-*u
%

ge x a u u *u
%

u *u
%
-a
3(*i)
ge
gu-6+a7 ku
3
-sig
1%
6652
3
7766$#77u *u
%
-a
o e[leave u e
3

u e
3
-e
3
-*a &a-a-*u
3
a-!a-ru-ka!
o gal[big u gal-gal
o gid[drag u gi*
2
-*a
o gid[long u gi*
2
-*a
u gi*
2
-*a a-ra
2
2(*i)-ka! giri
3
ur-e
2
-iu
o gin[establish u gi-a
u-a gi-a
3(u) u*u iga u-a gi-a
sa
2
-*u
11
u-a gi-a
u-a gi-a-a
'(&arig) '(&a
2
) easag
10
u-a gi-a
u-[a] gi-a
u-a gi-a
sa
2
-*u
11
u-a gi-[a ...]
a!-ra ak u-a gi-a lu
2
u
'
*a&
5
-&a ki lugal-ku
3
-+u
u-a &i
2
-gi
[u]-a &i
2
-gi
1(*i) u*u iga u-a gi-a
u-a gi-a
u-a gi-a iti-*a
2(&arig) 1(&a
2
) 3(*i) sila
3
+i
3
-sig
15
ea u-[a gi]-a iti-*a
sa
2
-*u
11
u-a gi-a
8(*i) sila
3
i
3
u-gir
2
sa
2
-*u
11
u-a gi-a
o gub[stand u gu&-&a
u gu&
u-!u-ke
'
gu&-&a
S!AT M4M 9.
o gur[turn u gur-gur
!u lugal-e ui-gur("#)
1(ge
2
) er
3
u gur-ra
1(u) 2(*i)
a
'
+a-gul u gur-ra
1(u-.) la
2
2(*i)gi u gur-ra
8(a-.) gi u gur-ra
o /ar[place u 1ar
[u] 1ar
[u 1ar]-ra
u &a-a&-ta-ga
2

u &a-a&-ta-ga
2
-e-!e
[x-A3-e e
2
]-&i u &a-i
?
-gar
u-a i
3
-a-i-gar-ra
o /ar[place gi[turn [u 1ar] gi
'

o hehezer[s>ueeze u 0e-0e-+e
2
-er
o hulu[bad di[speak u 0ul *i
o hum[paralyze u 0u! * u 0u!-!a-x
o hunu[weak u 0u-0u-u
o huz[cvve u 60u7-u+
o il[raise u-i al-il
2
= qa
2
-ta-u za-an-@-bi-la * [u] il
2
-la
o kag[mouth sa[e>ual u ka-ta sa
2
-a
o kar[insult u kar
2
-kar
2
* lu
2
u kar
2
-ga = mu- a -pi-lum * lu
2
ukar
2
-ga = mu- a -ap-pi-
[lum]
o kud[cut u ku* * u-e-e a&-ku
5

o kud[cut /iri[foot kud[cut u ku* 1iri
3
ku*
o la[hang u-e
3
[la
2
] * lu
2
u la
2
-a = u
4
- u
2
-lum * u*u u la
2
-a @ [...] u la
2
-a *
u la
2
-* u la
2
-a * u la
2
-a * u
3
u la
2
-a e
2
x e
3
-a * !u gu
'
u la
2
-a ur-
*
&a-&a
)
*
u !u-e-ta-la
2
-a * u i!-ta-la
2
* ku
3
u la
2
-a ita-ka! * u la
2
-a ki *u
11
-ga-ta *
u la
2
-a sila-a "#$
%
-a * 1(*i) sila
'
u la
2
-a @
o la[stretch u la
2
-la
2

o luh[clean u lu0-0a * u lu0-lu0 * u lu0 ak [...]
o mah[great gid[drag u !a0 gi*
2
-i
o nim[high [u] i!
o rah[beat u ra-ra * lu
2
u-ara-a0 = a pu-u-[...] * lu
2
u ra-a0-a = ra-ap-du * u&
5
?
-
e u ra-a
*
*u!u-+i a&+u
?

Sumerian u&
5
?
-e u is a pun of Akkadian a pu-u-
Sumerian u&
5
?
-e u ra-a is a pun of Akkadian ra-ap-du
o ri[impose u ri-ri
o sag[beat u sag
3
-sag
3
-ge * u sag
3
-sag
3
-ge
o sag[good u sag
(
-ga * u sag
(
-sag
(
* u &a-ta-sa
)
-ge
o sal[thin u sal
o sir[bind u sir
3
(548
2
)-ri
o sun[haughty u su
%
(5A:)-a
o .ibir[staff u i&ir
o .ub[fall [u]-ta u&-&a
o .um[give u u!
2
-!a * u
?
su!-[!a] * u su!-!a * +i-ga u
3
?
u
?
su!-!a *
u su!-*e
3
ge-a * uri
5
ki
-!a u su!-!a * u su!-!u-*a! * u 0e
2
-su!-e *
u
3
u-ta su!-!a i
3
-i!-gar * u su!-!u-*a!* u-a &a-su! * u su!-e-*a! * +i-
ga kili&
3
-&a &ala-a-ka u su!-*a! * tug
2
si-il-la usu!-!a * tug
2
si-il-
la u su!-!a * egir
5
e
2
u su!-!a-ta* egir
5
e
2
u su!-!a-ta * tug
2
si-il-la u su
!-!a * tug
2
si-il-la u su!-!a * u su!-!u-*a! * u su!-!u-*e
3
* u-e 0a-
&a-a&-[su!]-!u * u 0e
2
-a-a&-su!-!u * 0u-ga
2
-gi
%
u 0e
2
-e-su! * u 0e
2
-
&a-a&-su!-!u * [u] u!
2
* [u &a]-a-u!
2
* ki usu!-!a * u su!-!a si-
i!-*a-i * u su!-!a * lu
2
-
*
sue lu
2
-
6ge
tukul7 e
2
u-&ar u su!-*e
3
ge-a *
gi "#$
%
-a ge-gi-a u su!-!a * gi "#$
%
-a ge-gi-a u su!-!a * ur-lugal-ke
'
u-
!u su!-!u-*a! *
o .um[slaughter u u!-!a * e
2
uu!-!a
o .u.[cover u u
2
-[u
2
] * u a&-u
2
-[u
2
]
o taba[companion u ta&-&a-e
o tag[touch u tag-ga-a& = zu-uh
2
-hi-in * u tag-ga-a& = te-qi
3
-i-u * [u] tag-
ga * 2(*i)u*u 2(*i) !a
2
ki u tag a&+u
*
iaa * ki u tag
*
aa u
3
*
ki u tag-ga
o tam[trust u ta!-[!a]
o te/[approach u ti-a u &a-[a-ti] * u &a-a-ti * u &a-a-ti-e-!e * u ti-a u &a-
a-ti * u &a-ti * [u] &a-ti * a*a&
ki
si/a-a-e
2
u &a-ti * [u] ti-a !u-a * sag-3#-x-
x u &a-ti * u &a-ti * 2(a) 5(&a
2
) i-gu-la u &a-ti * lugal-a
2
u &a-6ti7 * lu
2
-
a-au &a-ti * e-e *u&-sar-e u &a-ti * u &a-ti-a * i-!es-e u &a-ti * a-
tu u &a-ti * a!ar-u&a
3
-&i u &a-ti * ur-/a
'
-!e-ra u &a-ti * a!ar-
*
u&a
3
-&i u &
a-ti * lu
2
-
*
utu gu*u
'
u
3
ur-
*
la!!a u &a-ti-e
2
* u &a-[ti] * u ti-a * u &a-a-
ti * u ti-a
*
sue-a-/i
2
-i-ti * u &a-a-ti * u &a-[ti] * a!-0a-i u &a-ti * a-&u-
u!-*igir u&a-ti * u &a-a-ti-e * u [&a]-ti * [u &a]-ti * [u]&a-a-ti * [u &a]-
a-ti-!e * u&a-ti * e
2
-ki-*u
10
-ga u &a-ti * u &a-ti-e
2
* ere
2
-e u [&a]-ti *
[u]&a-ti * u-&ar-e
3
u ti-a * e
2
-i-ta u &a-ti * u&a-ti * ur-igar
gar
u &a-
ti * kii&
3
-&a-i u 0a-&a-a&-ti-ti * ukke-e
2
*u!u *u-*u-a!
3
u &a-ti * ik-u-
*u! u &a-ti * siki u u-ti-a *
*
i-lil
2
-a!a-!u u &a-ti * a-tu uu
3
u &a-ti * a-
kal-la u &a-ti * [u &a-ti] * [lu
2
]-*igir-ra-ke
'
u &a-ti * u &a-ti * u&a-a-ti * u &
a-a-ti * u[&a]-a-ti * e-gal-e si&
2
-ta-a u &a-a&-te-ga
2
-a!
3

o te/[approach u u ti-[a ...] * [*u&]8#< a
2
iri-e
3
ku
3
u ti-[a (...)] * [u] ti-
a * siki !ug ig
2
-&a lugal [...] u la-&a-a&-ti-a [...] * 3(&arig) u ti-a * [...] u ti-a *
1(a) '(&arig) 6u ti-a7 * 3(&arig) u ti-a * 2(&arig) u ti-a * [u &a]-ti-e * u &a-
ti-e * u ti-a x-x-x-34 * [...]*a& 2< u*u u ti-a * [u &a]-ti-a * [u] ti-*a! * uu-
ti-[a ...] * u
3

*i
e
2
-a-ta-a-a-ar *u!u u ti x-x-x-x
o te/[approach .u[hand te/[approach u ti-a * u ti-a-e-[e] * u ti-a * u ti-a-e-e
o tu[cvve u tu-tu
o tulu[slacken u tu-lu
o tum[suitable u tu!
2

o tur[small u tur-tur * '(*i) u tur ku
3
-&a&&ar ki-la
2
-&i 6x7 gi
2
* kii&
3
ge!e
2
-
tur-tur [*u!u]
ge
gigir u tur * 2(*i) gir
2
u tur !i
2
-us
2
i
2
-&a *
2(*i) gir
2
u tur !i
2
-us
2
[i
2
-&a]
o zabar[bronze du[suitable u +a&ar-e *u
%

o zalag[shine u +alag-+alag
o zig[raise u +ig
3
-ga
o zig[rise dug[speak u +ig
3
-ga *ug
'
-ga * lu
2
u +i *ug
'
-ga = uz-zu-bu-u
2
* lu
2
u +ig
3
-
ga*ug
'
-ga = uz-zu-bu
o zuhul[pierce u +u-0u-ul
See) W piri/ .u du* a .u du tug* a .u n bala* a .u u* a .u an* a .u luh* a .u tag* aba .u u* apin .u*
apin .u du* bardul .u ur* bisa/ .u* bulug .u* bulug .u W* bun .u* bur .u* e bur .u .u.* e .u
.um*gumur .u* /e.hur .u* /isal .u* har .u* har .u kugbabbar* har .u kugsig* illar .u
lugal* kalam .u du*ka. .u .ub* lungak .u du* manu .u ak* masab .u* munus u .u bala* munus
.u ak* na .u n* ninda .u* ninda .u u* ninda .u ila* ninda .u ur* nurma pu .u sub* sa .u* sar .u
la* siki .u* siki .u kad*.ag .u* .e .u* .e .u ak* .u te/ .u te/* .um sikil .u min gidua* tu .u* tu .u
u* tug barsig .u du* tug .u* tukul .u* ud men .u du* udu .u kud* udu .u sa/ duga* ur .u du* uzu
.ag .u ni/in* zilulu .u hal sil.
Akk. qtu +hand+.
[9]]] A. ,avigneau6 and R. Alrawi( ,' MI 4M%48.
*ee <&5*2 .u?hand.
Nntil now we have observed the mutual double switch of an Akkadian word to another
Akkadian cognate in order to create artificial Sumerian derivatives. So why would a scribe
switch the phonetic values of entire Akkadian sentences to Sumerian ones when there is no
logical connection between the two groupsw The plan was simple. Akkadian scribes didnUt
need just Semitic words to create Sumerian respective ones. They needed Akkadian grammar*
not necessarily Semitic grammar per se but the Semitic word order even when they placed
Semitic words in reverse. They needed language cohesion. They had to borrow the word
order( even in reverse as not to lose track of Sumerian language as a whole. That is the reason
why they often had to switch phonetic values to words that had no relationship with the
original ones semantically. That was a great idea. A scribe could create Sumerian words in
bulk. -e could create a grammar%worthy system without losing track of the artificial language
itself. If a scribe based the Sumerian grammar on the reverse order of Akkadian there was
absolute certainty that there would not be any grammar mishaps in the new tongue.
Rinally the cognate lef tin Sumerian)
gab [T3RT $<96) #ld Akkadian( #ld 7abylonian& wr. gab
2
-bu* gab
2
+left $hand&+
Akk. umlu
[1] gab
9
%bu
[2] gab
9
M< distinct forms attested* click to view forms table.
1. leAt (0a*) (52x/100%)
o T3WC#ld 7abylonianC!ippur ra-&i-si
2
-ka
3
-tu! Ba
2
-u-u! a
2
gu&
3
-&u #7 !ippur Tu
9].T3WC#ld 7abylonianCSippar [[ga&
2
]] = = 5A; = u-me-lu-um 'ST M4( M99%M9J ]I
5]<.T3WC#ld 7abylonianCunknown lu
2
a
2
gu&
3
-&u = u-me-lu-u
2
#7 Tu%Azlag A
85J* [lu
2
] a
2

gu&
3
-&u = u-me-lu-u
2
lu9%azlag 7 and , Seg.J( MK* lu
2
a
2
gu&
3
+i*-*a si
3
-
ke = ri-it-pu-hu lu9%azlag 7 and , Seg.J( MJ. 3TACNr IIIC2irsu 1(&a
2
) +i
3
ga&
2
-
ga&
2
*u!u u-&a*a
3
A7T@ M8 K* a
3
ga&
2
tug
2
-e
3
ge-a A7T@ MI
I* 1(ge
2
) 3(u) 2(*i)
ge
[...]ga&
2
gi*
2
1(*i) 1/2(*i) [...]-ta ITT 9( ]]5I9 o v
MJ. unknownCNr IIICNmma e ga&
2
la
2
-aSAT 8( MJJ9 9.
See) .uba a gab.
Akk. umlu +the left+.
#bserve -um ? -u
2
are picto%homograms( they have similar pronunciations notably
the vowel N and formally the pictogram -u
2
$K strokes of stylus& is a reduced -um
$M] strokes of stylus&
Akkadian) u -me -lu -um ? left hand
Akkadian) u -me -lu -u
2
? left hand
Sumerian u = hand
Sumerian u is an abbreviated form of Akkadian u -me -lu -u
2

There is another clue to the Sumerian puzzle( namely the purpose of Sumerian.
a [A@' $KMM<6) 3A IIIa( 3A IIIb( #ld Akkadian( Tagash II( Nr III( 3arly #ld 7abylonian(
#ld 7abylonian& wr. a
2
+arm* labor* wing* horn* side* strength* wage* power+
Akk. ahu* idu
[1]
Sumerian gab [T3RT Akk. umlu
Sumerian a
2
+arm* labor* wing* horn* side* strength* wage* power+ Akk. ahu
It is obvious that and are picto%homograms of opposite directions. They are
actually picto%antonyms( a notion that is foreign to us( people who use letters not pictures to
describe ideas.
"hy does Sumerian gab [T3RT point actually to the right side of the scribe( unless Sumerian
is the language of the gods to whom their left is the scribeUs right\ Sumerian is not the
language of humans. It was never spoken by man. Sumerian was the language of the gods
whose left was the scribeUs right. This is the ultimate proof that Sumerian people have
never e6isted. Their invention is the conclusion of linguists who cannot fathom the idea that
< thousand years ago humans were capable of manipulating language to that e6tent that
they could create a completely new medium between humans and gods.