ROGER K. PARSONS, 2520 K AVENUE, SUITE 700-739 PLANO, TEXAS 75074-5342 TEL +1214.649,8059 FAX +1972.295.2776 oMAL BLK Parsons@TexasfiaeWatch US WEB. hil //TowasRatWatch US December 6, 2010 David M. Hardy, Section Chi Record/Information Dissemination Section Records Management Divis Federal Bureau of Investigation 170 Marcel Drive Winchester, VA 22602-4843 ‘CM-RRR No. 7008 2810 0001 8907 8429 Re: FOIPA Request No. 1157320-000 Subject: FBI Background Investigation on Barbara Michele Golden Lynn, Judge Dear Section Chief Hardy: | write in response to your November 18, 2010 letter advising me that you will not release any FBI records responsive to the referenced FOIA request (No. 1157320-000) until | provide you “...a clear demonstration that the public interest in disclosure outweighs the personal privacy interests..." of Judge Lynn “...and that significant public benefit would result from the disclosure of the requested records.” By this letter | expressly request that you also conduct a search for public records maintained by FBI offices, including the Fort Worth and Dallas offices, that are responsive to my FOIPA request. The attached copy of my recent letter to the Department of Justice (“DoJ") and the FBI encloses (1) a complaint, pursuant to the Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 2004 (18 U.S.C. § 3771); (2) a cover letter for the complaint to United States Attorney James T. Jacks ("USA Jacks”); and (8) a CD (“Enclosure 2") containing documentary evidence supporting the allegation made in the letter to USA Jacks. As summarized below, the letter to USA Jacks and the documentary evidence referenced therein provides a clear demonstration of the significant public benefit that will result from disclosure of the requested records. The evidence shows that prior to being confirmed as a federal judge, Judge Lynn conspired with clients Windle Turley (“Turley”); Baron & Budd, P.C. President Frederic M. Baron (“Baron”) and Secretary Lisa A. Blumenthal ("Blue") Baron; and Baron & Budd, P.C. captive attorneys: Robert M. Greenberg and Robert E. Motsenbocker in multimillion dollar frauds against several asbestos liability insurers, and Turley's professional liability insurer.’ Furthermore, the evidence shows that in exchange for her role in the fraud conspiracy, Judge Lynn obtained the use of her ‘coconspirators’ influence with the Clinton Administration to obtain her March 25, 1999 judicial nomination, and influence with Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLLP. ("CCS&B") attorneys to mislead the FBI investigators who reported to the Untied States Senate before the November 17, 1999 confirmation vote. * As state in the letter to USA Jacks, the evidence shows that American International Group, Inc. ("AIG") was a key oconspirator in the inital fraud conspiracy, and is a key coconspirator in a continuing bribery/extortion conspiracy that was orchestrated to derail my civil fraud cases that threatened to expose the underlying fraud conspiracy. Re: FOIPA Request No.: 1157320-000 Page 1 of 2Judge Lynn and Judge Lynn's coconspirators, including AIG, know that her confirmation was the product of frauds against the United States Senate, impeachable offenses. Consequently, whenever Judge Lynn is assigned toa case brought by one of her coconspirators, there is an implied extortion threat by the coconspirator against Judge Lynn. When Judge Lynn does not recuse herseif from the case, there is an implied acknowledgement by Judge Lynn that she will bias her rulings in the case to favor her coconspirators. In fact, Judge Lynn has failed to recuse herself in at least two cases that were filed by her coconspirators: Gatson et al v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation et al (Case #3:07-cv-00848), a wrongful death case brought by Turley; and USA v. Abbott Laboratories et al (Case #3:06-cv-01769-M), a False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729) case brought by Baron & Budd, P.C. ‘The circumstances surrounding Judge Lynn's nomination and confirmation make it clear that ‘public interest in what the United State Senate was told about Judge Lynn's affiliations prior to voting to confirm her far outweighs Judge Lynn's personal interests in hiding those affiliations. Because the requested records were generated to inform the public’s elected representatives before voting the public's interests to either confirm or not confirm Judge Lynn, public disclosure of the requested records will allow individuals with information overlooked by or concealed from the FBI to petition their representatives and law enforcement authorities to conduct the requisite Congressional and grand jury investigations.® Sincerely, Roger K. Parsons 2 As the public leamed in the recent impeachment tial of Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jt, except in special investigations like Operation Wrinkled Robe, the FBI does not have the resources to repeatedly recheck the veracty of statements made to its agents in preparing background reports to the United States Senate for use in judicial confirmation proceedings. 2 The 18 U.S.C. § 9771 complaint was originally filed with the Northern District of Texas United States Attorney, however Assistant United States Aitomney Chad E. Meacham states that that office will not handle my complaint. ‘The reason for Mr. Meacham decision net to handle my complaint may arise from his association with Judge Lyan ‘while sho oversaw tho high-protlle bribery conspiracy case (3:07-cr-00289-R) in which he made a plea deal with defendants Brian L. Potashnik and Cheryl Potashnik, who were being simultaneously represented by Judge Lynn's former law partners at CCS8B in closely related state cout civil actions (Texas 68° District Court Case No. DC-10-02674 and Texas 95" District Court Case No. DC-10-12283). At the sentencing hearing that is scheduled for December 17, 2010, Judge Lynn will undoubtedly give Brian and Chery! Potashnik light sentences as she did for Brian Potashnix’s father, Jack Potashnik, in another related criminal case (3:07-cr-00291-M-1). Re: FOIPA Request No.: 1157320-000 Page 2 of 2