Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
10.1177/0013916504266807
Ruback, Kohli / TERRITORIALITY
AND BEHAVIOR A
/ TMarch
THE MAGH
2005 MELA
R. BARRY RUBACK is a professor of crime, law, and justice and sociology at Penn-
sylvania State University. His research in environmental psychology focuses on the
correlates of environmental stressors, particularly crowding. He is also interested in
decision making in the legal system.
NEENA KOHLI received her B.A., M.A., and D.Phil. degrees from the University of
Allahabad, India. Currently a senior lecturer at the University of Allahabad, she has
worked on factors involved in psychological recovery following tragic life events. Her
present research interests include illness cognitions and adjustment to chronic illness,
the role of health beliefs in recovery, and stress and pain management.
ABSTRACT: The Magh Mela, an annual Hindu festival held at the confluence of the
Ganges and Yamuna rivers, attracts about 150,000 pilgrims who stay for a month in
campsites maintained by religious organizations. This study examined territoriality at
the campsites in terms of (a) observed characteristics—including personalizations
(e.g., flags, banners) and barriers (e.g., fences, gates)—and (b) behavioral responses
to an experimental intrusion by 1 or 2 intruder-interviewers who were either male or
female. Across dependent measures, larger organizations and more fundamentalist
organizations were more territorial. Results from the experiment indicated that terri-
torial defense, in the form of a faster response to an intrusion, was evidenced more for
female than male intruders and more for 1 than 2 intruders. These findings suggest
that the concept of territorial defense should be broadened beyond physically threat-
ening intrusions to include symbolically threatening intrusions (e.g., an intrusion by a
single woman).
Keywords: territoriality; religion; gender; India
178
Ruback, Kohli / TERRITORIALITY AT THE MAGH MELA 179
1974) and protecting the area from outsiders (Lyman & Scott, 1967; Sommer
& Becker, 1969). There can be other benefits as well. For instance, when ter-
ritories are clearly defined, aggression is less common (Eibl-Eibesfeldt,
1970), group cohesion is greater (Suttles, 1968, p. 38), and valuable
resources are likely to last longer (Acheson, 1975; Taylor, 1988).
Territorial behavior is especially important for primary territories—areas
that are central to one’s life. The more important the area is, the more defen-
sive measures that are likely to be employed. For example, with primary terri-
tories such as the home, occupants are likely to use several defensive mea-
sures (e.g., fences, locked doors) to keep outsiders outside. Thus, people who
own their homes are more likely than renters to personalize their homes with
markers (Greenbaum & Greenbaum, 1981), although it might be that causal-
ity works both ways. That is, individuals who are more territorial use more
markers of territory, and individuals who personalize their territory with
more markers are more attached to that territory (Brown, 1987). Similarly,
homeowners who use aggressive territorial markers (e.g., “No Trespassing”
signs, “Beware of Dog” signs, fences) are likely to have lived longer in their
homes, plan to live there longer in the future, and respond to a doorbell more
quickly (Edney, 1972).
Most studies of territoriality have examined public territories—areas that
are temporarily occupied and to which anyone has free access (Altman,
1975). Studies of territoriality at such public territories as hallways, beaches,
park benches, and library tables suggest that people establish territories
(Edney & Jordan-Edney, 1974; H. W. Smith, 1981) and that potential intrud-
ers recognize these temporary territories (Cheyne & Efran, 1972). However,
occupants are not likely to defend them (e.g., Patterson, Mullens, & Romano,
1971; Sommer & Becker, 1969) unless those locations are valuable for a par-
ticular purpose (Ruback, 1987; Ruback, Pape, & Doriot, 1989; Taylor &
Brooks, 1980). There is also some evidence that people will defend public
territories even if it is contrary to their goal of leaving (Ruback & Juieng,
1997). In contrast to these studies of public territories, the present research
examined secondary territories, those semipublic locations that are less cen-
tral and exclusive than primary territories but that have more ownership and
are under more control than public territories (Altman, 1975).
AUTHORS’NOTE: This research was supported by Penn State University and by the
Centre for Advanced Study in Psychology and the Centre for Behavioural and Cogni-
tive Sciences at the University of Allahabad. We thank Sabika Abbas, Pankaj Bharti,
Azra Ishrat, and Sunil Verma for their help with the collection and coding of the data.
We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
180 ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR / March 2005
ROLE OF RELIGION
camp on the open land of the Sangam. During the monsoon season, the Gan-
ges at this point is about a mile wide. During the month of Magh, however,
the Ganges River is less than a quarter mile wide, which means there are
extensive areas of sand and silt. It is on this land that the kalpavasis camp.
According to the government authorities overseeing the festival, the 2003
Mela spread across an area of about 300 bighas, or roughly 600 acres. About
one sixth of this area was nonresidential and was devoted to administrative
offices, police stations, and medical facilities. The remaining land was resi-
dential (i.e., where the camps were set up). Altogether in 2003 there were
approximately 2,150 campsites of which 1,500 were set up by various orga-
nizations and 650 by religious pandits (learned men who organize their own
camps, often for profit). The Mela Authority, which is part of the Uttar
Pradesh state government, allocates land for the campsites.
Allocation of land. The most desirable sites at the Mela are those located
on the major roads and near the Sangam. In general, those organizations that
had been to the Magh Mela before continue to receive the same campsite that
they had used before. However, because the course of the Ganges River
changes every year, the location of streets and the amount of land available
for campsites necessarily changes as well. The allocation of land is also com-
plicated by the fact that the riverbed is not even, and organizations assigned
land containing pits are likely to be dissatisfied. Moreover, allocation can be a
problem when new organizations apply for space. Sometimes they are given
land that had originally been assigned to an organization that did not show up.
If the new organizations are powerful they are given the best sites, irrespec-
tive of the group to which it had been originally allotted. More often, new
organizations are given new sites where there was no camp the previous year.
generally are brightly colored, may be of various shapes, and often contain
symbols so that pilgrims can easily identify them.
The Mela provides an excellent opportunity to investigate territoriality in
secondary territories, and this study extends research on territoriality in three
ways. First, it examines the cross-cultural generalizability of some of the
underlying assumptions of territoriality. That is, most territorial research
has assumed that the threat from intrusion to the physical space is to occu-
pants or possessions. It might be that the primary threat posed by an
intruder is to beliefs rather than to physical security. This notion is consis-
tent with Altman’s (1975) suggestion that territoriality—especially for
secondary territories—can serve several functions, including group identity.
In such cases, territoriality is a way to defend that identity. Second, it investi-
gates the conflict religious groups may have in terms of welcoming or barring
outsiders. Third, it looks at the role of groups in territorial behavior, specifi-
cally group norms and specialized roles.
HYPOTHESES
METHOD
OVERVIEW
PARTICIPANTS
PROCEDURE
Two teams, consisting of either two males or two females, conducted the
study. Each pair conducted the intrusions as a replicate of four conditions in
the following order: intrusion by both, intrusion by one, intrusion by both,
intrusion by the other. In this way there were the same number of single and
double intrusion conditions, and this order permitted us to control for possi-
ble day and time of day effects. When both individuals intruded, one asked
the questions and the other completed the observation form. The two individ-
uals alternated between these roles in the condition where both intruded.
From the Mela administration authorities we obtained a map of the site
that we used to systematically sample campsites from every street in the
Mela. Researchers started at one end of the street and collected data at every
other camp. For each road in the Mela the two men worked as a team on one
side while the two women worked as a team on the other side.
The study was conducted on 9 different days during a 2-week period in
February 2003. No interviews were conducted on the major ritual bathing
days when there were about a million visitors to the Sangam.
they were conducting a study on the use of space at the Mela and were inter-
ested in asking respondents some questions that would take about 10 min.4 If
they agreed, and all did, then the interviewers began the structured questions.
All of the intruder-interviewers were extensively trained and had the oppor-
tunity to practice delivering these instructions during several pilot sessions.
Consistent with the practice in other studies involving minor intrusions that
commonly occur (e.g., Milgram, Liberty, Toledo, & Wackenhut, 1986), we
did not debrief research participants about the experimental manipulation.
Three interviews were terminated before all of the interview data were col-
lected. The individuals at these three campsites, when told about the inter-
view, said they preferred not to answer any questions because they had
additional equipment from the government (e.g., fluorescent lights) beyond
what they should have had. Even though they had been promised anonymity,
they were afraid that their behavior would become known to the authorities.
For these three campsites, however, we still had measures of intrusion time
and of the observation items.
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
OBSERVATION FORM
3 ft, 6 ft, or 9 ft); the number and type of tents; the number of water taps and
toilets; the size and type of cooking facility; the number of incandescent and
fluorescent bulbs; the number of beds and chairs; the type of flooring in the
camp; and whether the camp had grass and flowers.
When two interviewers intruded, they completed the observation form
together. When only one interviewer intruded, both that person and the other
person (who was on the road outside the camp) completed the observation
form. Thus, for half of the campsites (i.e., when there was only one intruder)
we have measures of the reliability of the observations. Because the person
who was on the road outside could not see everything that was inside the
camp, reliability could be determined for only 15 items.
In general, reliability was very high for the nominally coded items: 97%
for the size of the flags, 98% for the size of the banners, 97% for whether
there were private guards, 99% for the type of gate, 100% for the position of
the gate (open, half open, or closed), 95% for the height of the boundary, 99%
for the type of boundary, 94% for whether there was a covered area for reli-
gious discourse, 91% for whether there was grass in the camp, 96% for
whether there were flowers in the camp, and 91% for the type of flooring in
the tents. For the continuous items that the outside observer could see, the
correlations were also very high (rs greater than .99 for the number of flags,
number of banners, and number of boundaries and r = .91 for the number of
small tents).
RESULTS
would use both banks at the point where the two rivers meet. For two very
long streets we used two midpoints to calculate the distance from the
Sangam. Correlations between this distance on the map and characteristics of
the campsites revealed several significant relationships. In general, these
results suggested that camps that were farther from the Sangam were less
territorial—fewer flags, r(238) = –.13, p < .05, and fewer boundaries around
the camp, r(238) = –.37, p < .001. People at campsites farther from the
Sangam were less likely to say the site was their first choice and more likely
to say they had gone to the Mela authorities to ask for a new location. This
finding is consistent with the fact that campsites farther away are less
desirable.
TABLE 1
Comparison of Small and Large Campsites at the Magh Mela
Size of Organization
Small Large
2
Aspects of the Campsite (n = 103) (n = 138) t or
TABLE 2
Interaction of Number of Intruders, Gender of Intruders, and Size
of Organization on Response Time to Intrusion (Means in Seconds)
c d,e c,d b
One 31.3 43.5 39.3 24.2
c,d a e d,e
Two 36.7 14.6 46.4 43.9
NOTE: Means that share a common superscript are not significantly different according to a post hoc
Newman-Keuls test (p < .05).
(M = 7.9 min), F(1, 222) = 24.46, p < .001. Interviews with males could have
been longer because our intruder-interviewers, despite their training, might
have behaved differently; the males might have been more curious and asked
questions whereas the females were more businesslike. More likely, how-
ever, the camp members probably felt more comfortable talking with the men
than with the women.
There was also a significant Number of Intruders × Gender of Intruders
interaction, F(1, 222) = 4.38, p < .05, such that although people in the camp-
sites always responded sooner to female than male intruders, the difference
was much greater when there were two intruders (Ms = 7.7 s vs. 11.7 s for
female and male intruders, respectively) than when there was one intruder
(Ms = 8.2 s vs. 9.8 s for female and male intruders, respectively). The means
for the female intruder conditions were not significantly different from each
other, but all other differences were significant.
Finally, there was a significant Gender of Intruders × Fundamentalism of
the Organization interaction, F(1, 222) = 5.70, p < .05. The difference in
lengths of interviews of female and male intruders was significantly greater
for low fundamentalist organizations (Ms = 11.2 min vs. 6.9 min for female
and male intruders, respectively) than for high fundamentalist organizations
(Ms = 8.9 min and 10.4 min for female and male intruders, respectively). All
means were significantly different from each other.
Number of people spoken to. We believed that the number of camp resi-
dents who spoke to the interviewers would be a measure of interest in
strangers and therefore would be related to territoriality. The number of people
who spoke to the intruders ranged from 1 to 10 (M = 1.98, Mdn = 2.00). A 2 × 2 ×
2 × 2 (Number of Intruders × Gender of Intruders × Size of Organization ×
Fundamentalism of Organization) revealed two significant effects. Not sur-
prisingly, more people from large organizations spoke to the intruders (M =
2.22) than did people from small organizations, M = 1.66, F(1, 220) = 11.01,
p < .001. There was also a significant Gender of Intruders × Size of Organiza-
tion × Fundamentalism of Organization interaction, F(1, 220) = 4.30, p < .05.
As can be seen in Table 3, for high fundamentalist organizations, for both
male and female intruders, more people spoke to the intruders when the orga-
nizations were large than small, although the difference was much greater for
female than male intruders. For low fundamentalist organizations there was
no difference for female intruders as a function of organization size, but for
male intruders there was the overall main effect of more people for large than
small organizations.
Because the number of pilgrims at a campsite greatly varied, we also ana-
lyzed the data in terms of people spoken to as a proportion of the total number
194 ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR / March 2005
TABLE 3
Interaction of Gender of Intruders, Size of Organization, and Fundamentalism
of Organization on Number of People Who Spoke to the Intruders
b c,d b,c a
Small 1.63 1.90 1.71 1.38
e d,e d,e f
Large 2.18 2.01 2.03 2.67
NOTE: Means that share a common superscript are not significantly different according to a post hoc
Newman-Keuls test (p < .05).
TABLE 4
Logistic Regressions of Dichotomous Measures of Territoriality
significance. Thus, we report here only the main effects for the three
variables.
As can be seen in Table 4, male intruder-interviewers were more welcome
at the campsites than were female intruder-interviewers as male intruder-
interviewers were more likely to have been invited inside the camp and to sit
down. Similarly, two intruders were more likely than one intruder to be wel-
comed as two intruders were more likely to be invited inside the camp,
invited to sit down, and offered refreshment. Larger organizations were more
likely to have offered refreshment. The fundamentalism of the organization
had no effect on any of the dichotomous measures.
PHOTOGRAPHS
DISCUSSION
(1967) referred to as a “violation.” The results probably would have been dif-
ferent had the intrusion been greater. For example, it may be the case that our
manipulation of multiple males was not strong enough. That is, two male
strangers may not have posed enough additional threat beyond a single male
stranger to cause increased concern about the welfare of the campsite.
One of the novel aspects of this research was that it was conducted at a
location where Hindu pilgrims went for religious purposes. Because of the
unique nature of the population and the location, the results may have limited
generalizability. It would be important to determine whether these findings
are replicable in other cultures. For example, would high fundamentalist
organizations holding revival meetings in the United States be territorial in
response to intrusions by strangers?
There is an interesting irony in terms of the nature of social identity and
the practice of religion in Asian and Western cultures. In general, in terms of
social identity, Asian cultures tend to be more collectivistic (i.e., individuals
tend to define themselves primarily in terms of group memberships such as
family and nation) whereas Western cultures tend to be more individualistic
(i.e., individuals tend to place their own goals and happiness above those of
the groups to which they belong; Hofstede, 1980; Markus & Kitayama,
1991).
But with the practice of religion, the pattern is different. As Iannaccone
(1995) has noted, Western religions tend to be collective in that they are con-
gregationally oriented. To prevent the free-rider problem, these religions
tend to be exclusive and require high levels of commitment. In contrast,
Asian religions tend to be more private. People often do not have exclusive
attachments to a single religion, and their religious practices tend to focus on
a single religious practitioner or to involve fee-for-service transactions
(Iannaccone, 1995). In addition, there tend to be more household rituals and
more money offerings to specific gods for particular outcomes.
These patterns of social identity and religious practices in Asian and
Western cultures suggest an interaction regarding territoriality in nonreli-
gious and religious places. Although collective solutions are not always used
in collective societies (P. B. Smith & Bond, 1993), they are probably more
likely because group membership is an important component of identity,
groups are less easy to leave, and group efforts are more likely to be success-
ful (Triandis, Bontempo, Villareal, Asai, & Lucca, 1988). Thus, we might
expect more of a collective response to intrusions in nonreligious settings in
Asian than in Western locations whereas we might expect more of a collec-
198 ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR / March 2005
NOTES
1. The Hindi term is panda. Pandas help worshippers gain quick entry to their temple, and
at the Sangam they help people perform the last rites of the dead. Individuals have their own
panda and visit only him for religious reasons. Whenever an individual visits a panda, the
panda enters the event in ledgers that contain records of the visits of that person’s ancestors to
the panda’s forefathers. Regions, groups, and sects are likely to have their own panda.
2. All but 46 campsites had a physical boundary of some type facing the street, and thus it was
clear when the intruders had entered the campsite. For the 46 campsites that did not have a physi-
cal boundary, the intruders were considered to have entered the campsite when they crossed an
imaginary boundary that was aligned with the boundaries of the neighboring campsites.
3. We counted a closed gate as 0 s because it was the same as being met immediately at the
gate. Excluding the three cases in which the gate was closed from the analyses of response time
produced substantially the same pattern of results as those reported in the Response Time After
Intrusion section.
4. In most cases the responding individual was the person who greeted the intruders. In some
cases, however, the intruders were taken to the head of the campsite. In all cases the responding
individual was a male.
5. Because many respondents were illiterate and not accustomed to scales, we used a two-
step procedure in which respondents were first asked whether they were fundamentalist “a lot” or
just “a little.” If they answered “a lot,” they were then asked whether their fundamentalism was
strong or very strong. If they answered “a little,” they were then asked whether their fundamental-
ism was “little” or “very little.”
6. The interviewers asked respondents to name the primary god to which the sect worshipped
because we suspected that the gender and nature of the god might be related to territorial defense.
To test this hypothesis, we recoded responses into eight categories: Durga (4%), Ganga (7%),
Hanuman (3%), Krishna (4%), Ram (22%), Shiva (24%), Vishnu (7%), and other gods (29%).
However, analyses of variance of the continuous measures and chi-square analyses of the nomi-
nal measures indicated that this variable was not significantly related to any of our measures of
territoriality and thus it is not discussed further.
7. When we conducted the analysis using an arcsine transformation of the proportion there
was the same main effect for organization size and a marginally significant interaction (p = .056).
The fundamentalism effect was not significant.
REFERENCES
Acheson, J. M. (1975). The lobster fiefs: Economic and ecological effects of territoriality in the
Maine lobster industry. Human Ecology, 3, 183-207.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Ruback, Kohli / TERRITORIALITY AT THE MAGH MELA 199
Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: Uni-
versity of California Press.
Suttles, G. D. (1968). The social order of the slum: Ethnicity and territory in the inner city. Chi-
cago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, R. B. (1988). Human territorial functioning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
Taylor, R. B., & Brooks, D. K. (1980). Temporary territories? Responses to intrusions in a public
setting. Population and Environment, 3, 135-145.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and
collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personal-
ity and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
Weber, M. (1963). The sociology of religion (E. Fischoff, Trans.). Boston: Beacon. (Original
work published 1922)