I

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Conducting an examination of this importance and magnitude invoves the support and
cooperation of man! individuas and institutions"

We are gratefu to #rof" $urendra #rasad for sho%ing confidence in us to manage such an
important tas& and for his continued support during and after his tenure as the Chairman' (A)*
+,-+" #rof" ."K" $hevgaon&ar' on ta&ing over as Chairman (A)*+,-+' %as a source of strength as
%e entered into the crucia phase of the examination" We sincere! than& him for his
encouragement and guidance during (EE*+,-+ and preparing the ground for the ne% version of
(EE"

The success of //T*(EE +,-+ %as in no sma measure due to the hard %or& put in 0! ever!
mem0er of the (oint /mpementation Committee 1(/C*+,-+2" The (/C*+,-+ %as different in man!
respects" The team %as %iing to thin& innovative! and ta&e path*0rea&ing decisions %hich
resuted in man! ne% initiatives"

We than& the Directors of other participating institutions for their cooperation and
contri0ution"

$evera facut! mem0ers' technica and administrative staff mem0ers of a the //Ts too& part in
man! activities ranging from confidentia %or& to serving as institute representatives" We than&
a the facut! and staff %ho have contri0uted in an! %a! to the conduct of //T*(EE +,-+"

Our than&s are aso due to an important cog in the %hee of the (EE machiner!' the staff
%or&ing in the (EE offices of a the participating institutes" Their contri0ution in the success of
ever! (EE' incuding (EE*+,-+' is immense" We especia! %oud i&e to highight the contri0ution
of Mr" Dinesh' Mr" Le&hra3 $harma' Mr" Asho& Kumar' and Mr" Kishori La of the (EE office' //T
Dehi to ensure that a the tas&s %ere carried out in time' incuding among other things' a
num0er of seepess nights"



//T Dehi (EE Team +,-+
II

Report
/ntroduction -
(oint Admission )oard 4 #oic! decisions -
(oint /mpementation Committee5 Decisions and .eport 6
Lega Matters 7
//T*(EE +,-+ .esuts 8
$tatistica Ana!sis of (EE +,-+ candidate information --
9uestion #aper Ana!sis -:


Tables

Distribution of appeared and qualified candidates based on zone, category and socio-economic
background
Ta0e A- 4 Candidates appeared in 0oth papers"
Ta0e A+ 4 Candidates ;uaified 4 <one %ise
Ta0e A: * Cit! of origin of appicants
Ta0e A6 4 Cit! of origin of ;uaified candidates
Ta0e A= 4 9uaif!ing !ears
Ta0e A7 4 >one %ise distri0ution of registered' ;uaified' and counseed candidates according
to preparation method"
Ta0e A? 4 Counseed candidates and iving pace"
Ta0e A8 4 )oard of ;uaif!ing examination5 .egistered candidates"
Ta0e A@ 4 )oard of ;uaif!ing examination5 Candidates offered admission"
Ta0e A-, * >one %ise distri0ution of registered' ;uaified' counseed' and admitted candidates
according to gender"
Ta0e A-- * >one %ise distri0ution of registered' ;uaified' and counseed according to parents
education ;uaifications"
Ta0e A-+ * >one %ise distri0ution of registered' ;uaified' and counseed according to anguage
of ;uestion paper"
Ta0e A-: 4 Living pace and <one
Ta0e A-6 4 Occupation of parent5 9uaified 0ased on Gender
Ta0e A-= 4 Num0er of attempts5 .egistered' ;uaified' and counseed
Ta0e A-? 4 #arents income5 registered and ;uaified"

Trend Analysis
Ta0e )- 4 >one %ise trend of registered candidates
Ta0e )+ 4 Trend of registered candidates according to categor!
Ta0e ): 4 Trend of registered candidates according to anguage of ;uestion paper
Ta0e )6 4 Trend of registered candidates on 0asis of attempts
Ta0e )= 4 Trend of registered candidates according to gender"

Lists


1
Introduction:

The Joint Entrance Examination, popularly known as JEE, is jointly conducted by IIT Bombay, IIT Delhi, IIT
Guwahati, IIT Kanpur, IIT Kharapur, IIT !adras and IIT "oorkee# This is a $%&year old examination' more
than $%% thousand applicants compete (or approximately )*%% seats in +* Indian Institutes o( Technoloy
located in di((erent parts o( the country and Indian ,chool o( !ines, Dhanbad#

Joint -dmission Board is the body which is responsible (or (ramin all the polices co.erin/ eliibility (or
writin the examination, minimum marks one has to score in areate or at subject le.el, eliibility
criterion, number o( attempts one can make, mode o( counselin and number o( rounds o( seat allocation#
The members o( the J-B&0%+0 are listed below/

1.1 JOINT ADMISSIONS BOARD (JAB-2012)

No. Name o!ition
+# 1ro(# De.an 2 Khakhar
1ro(# -.inash !ahajan
1ro(# Tom !athew
Director,IIT Bombay
3hairman, JEE
2ice 3hairman, JEE
0# 1ro(# ! 3hakraborty Director, IIT Bhubaneswar
4# ro". Surendra ra!ad
ro". R.#.S$e%&aon'ar
ro". (.B. Redd)
1ro(# "ajesh Khanna
1ro(# 5arayanan Kurur
*$airman+ JAB-2012 6 Director, IIT Delhi upto 7ctober
*$airman+ JAB-2012 6 Director, IIT Delhi (rom 7ctober
Or&ani,in& *$airman J--
7r# 2ice 3hairman, JEE
7r# 2ice 3hairman, JEE
8# 1ro(# ,udhir Jain Director, IIT Gandhinaar
$# 1ro(# Gautam Barua
1ro(# Bishnupada !ondal
1ro(# ,# ,enthil.elan
Director, IIT Guwahati
3hairman, JEE
2ice 3hairman, JEE
*# 1ro(# 9 B Desai Director, IIT :yderabad
;# 1ro(# 1 !athur Director, IIT Indore
<# 1ro(# , G Dhande
1ro(# ,#K# 3houdhury
1ro(# "ajesh ,ri.asta.a
Director, IIT Kanpur
3hairman, JEE
2ice 3hairman, JEE
)# 1ro(# D -charya
1ro(# -# "# !ohanty
1ro(# K# 9# !# "ao
Director, IIT Kharapur
3hairman, JEE
2ice 3hairman, JEE
+%# 1ro(# B# "amamurthi
1ro(# -rindama ,inh
1ro(# "# ,arathi
Director, IIT !adras
3hairman, JEE
2ice 3hairman, JEE
++# 1ro(# T - Gonsal.es Director, IIT !andi
+0# 1ro(# -nil Bhowmick Director, IIT 1atna
+4# 1ro(# 1 K Kalra Director, IIT "ajasthan
+8# 1ro(# , 3 ,axena
1ro(# 1#Banerji
1ro(# 9 1 ,inh
1ro(# !#=# ,harma
Director, IIT "oorkee
Director
3hairman, JEE
2ice 3hairman, JEE
+$# 1ro(# ! K ,urappa Director, IIT "opar
+*# 1ro(# T# Kumar
1ro(# D#3#1anirahi
1ro(# !# Jawed
1ro(# G# 9dayabhanu
Director, I,! Dhanbad
Director, I,! Dhanbad
3hairman, JEE
2ice 3hairman, JEE

2
No. Name o!ition
+;# 1ro(# K 1 ,inh
1ro(# J#5#,inha
1ro(# Dhananjai 1andey
1ro(# 1#K#Jain
1ro(# 1ro(# ,# :# :asan
Director, IT B:9
Director
Director
3hairman, JEE
2ice 3hairman, JEE


1.2 Sc$edu.ed meetin& o" JAB and ma/or 0o.ic) c$an&e! a00ro%ed

The Joint -dmissions Board >J-B&0%+0? met (i.e times includin the (irst meetin, which was the combined
meetin o( J-B&0%++ and J-B&0%+0#

a# @irst J-B meetin/ -uust 0*, 0%++ at IIT Delhi
1ro(# ,#G# Dhande, Director IIT Kanpur and 3hairman J-B 0%++ initially chaired the meetin while
1ro(# ,#K# 3houdhury, 7raniAin 3hairman, JEE&0%++ presented statistical report and analysis based
on (acts and (iures related JEE&0%++ to J-B# -(ter the presentation by 1ro(# 3houdhury was o.er,
1ro(# Dhande handed o.er the chare o( the Joint -dmissions Board to 1ro(# ,urendra 1rasad
Director, IIT Delhi, who became the 3hairman o( J-B 0%+0# 1ro(# ,urendra 1rasad introduced 1ro(# G#
B# "eddy as the 7raniAin 3hairman o( IIT&JEE 0%+% and reBuested hime to present the aenda
items related policy issues (or conductin IIT&JEE 0%+0# 1ro(, G#B#"eddy then presented the aenda
items and also the timeline (or the conductin IIT&JEE 0%+0#

b# ,econd J-B meetin/ 7ctober +<, 0%++ at IIT Delhi
c# Third J-B meetin/ @ebruary 04, 0%+0 at IIT Delhi
d# @ourth J-B meetin/ June 04, 0%+0 at IIT Delhi
e# @i(th J-B meetin/ -uust $, 0%+0 at IIT Delhi


In t$e "ir!t meetin& t$e Board made t$e "o..o1in& 0o.ic) deci!ion!:
+# *$an&e o" Name/ J-B decided to chane the name o( the Joint Entrance Examination >JEE? as Indian
Institutes Technoloy&Joint Entrance Examination and re(er it as IIT&JEE (ollowed by the year in
which it is held#
0# Date o" -2amination/ J-B decided to conduct IIT&JEE 0%+0 on <
th
-pril 0%+0# The examination will
consist o( two paper o( three hours duration each#
4# *on%er!ion o" 3acant D !eat! into non-D !eat! o" re!0ecti%e cate&orie!
It was obser.ed that durin the past (ew years se.eral seats meant (or 1D cateory candidates
remain un(illed >a(ter preparatory course allotment?# It was resol.ed that such un(illed 1D seats a(ter
preparatory

8# enci.4en 5u55.e !$adin& o" ORS
The JI3&0%++ decision to recommend pen (illin o( the 7", was considered and appro.ed# It was also
decided to desin the 7", in such way that candidates can take away#

$# Di!0.a) o" ORS ima&e!
It was decided that the practice started in 0%++ o( candidates bein shown the imae o( their 7",
would be continued# "esol.ed that this (acility would start a (ew days a(ter result declaration and
last till a (ew days be(ore the (irst round o( seat allotment

3

*# JAB meetin&! num5erin& !c$eme
Decided to adopt assin a uniBue the numberin system to re(er e.ery J-B meetin# @or example,
the second meetin o( J-B&0%++ would be J-B#+#0

;# S0ecia. 0ro%i!ion! to 5.ind candidate!/ The pro.ision (or amanuensis was recommended# Chere.er
possible, detailed explanation o( the (iures accompanyin Buestions will be pro.ided# I( it cannot be
supplied, relie( (rom attemptin such Buestions, as identi(ied by the paper setters, will be pro.ided
and the scores will be

In t$e 2
nd
meetin& t$e Board made 0u5.ic t$e "o..o1in& 6ua.i")in& criteria "or IIT-J--.

<# 7ua.i")in& criterion
J-B decided the (ollowin criteria (or declarin a candidate Buali(ied JEE# D3andidates obtainin at
least +%E in each subject and 4$E in areate will be in a common rank list# 7B3>53=? candidates
with at least )E in each subject and 4+#$E in areate will be in the 7B3 rank list, while ,3F,TF1D
candidates with at least $E in each subject and +;#$E in areate will be in the respecti.e rank
lists# The ,3F,TF1D preparatory rank lists will be prepared i( the number o( candidates in the
respecti.e list is less than +#8 times the number o( seats in that cateory# 3andidates must secure at
least 0#$E in each subject and <#0$E in areate to be in the preparatory rank list# The cut&o((s in
each cateory would be determined by the number o( seats in that cateoryG#

In t$e 8
nd
meetin& t$e Board made "o..o1in& 0o.ic) "or IIT-J-- o" 6ua.i")in& criteria 0u5.ic.

)# 9en&t$ o" t$e Merit 9i!t! "or *oun!e..in&
It was decided that candidates correspondin to two times the number o( seats will be called (or
counsellin in GE and 7B3 cateories while it would be 4 times the number o( seats (or ,3, ,T, and
1D cateories# In case the lenth o( the "ank =ist o( any cateory is less than that o( the
correspondin merit list then counsellin will be restricted to the candidates in "ank list only#

+%# A00ro%ed -:IT 0o.ic)
D-llow the person to withdraw hisFher acceptance be(ore the 4rd round allotment >counsellin?# -s
an incenti.e it is proposed to re(und the (ee >"s# 8%%%% or "s 0%%%% a(ter deductin "s# +%%% as
processin (ee? pro.ided the in(ormation reaches JEE o((ice in time so that the resultant seat is
allotted to another aspirant in the third round o( counsellinG#

++# Identit) c$ec'in& a"ter Re&i!tration
J-B appro.ed JI3 proposal to supply all details o( security (eatures to establish the identity o( the
person at the time o( reistration in the Institute and also, thumb prints o( candidates collected on
the day o( the examination (or con(irmin that the person who wrote examination and who (inally
took the admission are the same or not#

+0# *oun!e..in& "ee reduction
-dmittin Institutes will be i.en all details o( security (eatures to establish the identity o( the person
at the time o( reistration in the Institute# -lso, thumb prints o( candidates collected on the day o(
the examination will be made a.ailable to the Institutes

+4# Im0.ementation o" Minorit) 6uota out o" OB* 6uote
Decided to implement the minority reser.ation on rosterin basis (rom the present academic year

In t$e ;
t$
meetin& t$e Board recommended t$e "o..o1in& re!o.ution to t$e IIT *ounci. "or it!
con!ideration.

4

+8# Nature and moda.itie! o" J---Ad%anced -2amination 2018

JEE&-d.anced examination shall be conducted exclusi.ely by IITs#
There shall be a suitable time ap between the JEE&!ain and JEE&-d.anced so that the results o(
JEE&!ain are a.ailable be(ore the JEE&ad.anced#
7nly the top +,$%,%%% candidates >includin all cateories? in JEE&!ain will be Buali(ied to appear
in the JEE&-d.anced Examination#
-dmission to IITs will be based only on cateory wise -ll India "ank >-I"? in JEE&-d.anced subject
to condition that such candidates are in the top 0% percentile o( success(ul candidates o( their
Boards in respecti.e cateories#
There will be separate J-B and JI3 (or JEE&-d.anced with the present composition
The J-B and JI3 will also coordinate with oraniAin body responsible (or conductin JEE&!ain#
J-B resol.ed these recommendations may be placed be(ore the IIT 3ouncil and ,enates o( each
IIT may be taken into con(idence#G

In t$e <
t$
meetin& t$e Board recommended to t$e IIT *ounci. t$at t$e !tructure o" t$e J---Ad%anced
2018 and !)..a5i 5e t$e !ame a! t$at o" IIT-J-- 2012.

1.8 Joint Im0.ementation committee (JI*)
This committee, which consists o( the JEE 3hairman and the 2ice&chairman o( the se.en IITs, had the
constitution i.en below#
1ro(# -# !ahajan 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Bombay
1ro(# Tom !athew 2ice 3hairman IIT Bombay
1ro(# G# B# "eddy 7r# 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Delhi
1ro(# 5# D# Kurur 2ice 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Delhi
"o(, "ajesh Khanna 2ice 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Delhi
1ro(# B# 1# !andal 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Guwahati
1ro(# ,# ,enthil.elan 2ice 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Guwahati
1ro(# ,# K# 3houdhury 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Kanpur
1ro(# "# ,ri.asta.a 2ice 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Kanpur
1ro(# -# "# !ohanty 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Kharapur
1ro(# K# 9# !# "ao 2ice 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT Kharapur
1ro(# -# ,inh 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT !adras
1ro(# "# ,arathi 2ice 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT !adras
1ro(# 9# 1# ,inh 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT "oorkee
1ro(# !# =# ,harma 2ice 3hairman JEE 0%+0 IIT "oorkee

The committee had ++ meetins times to plan and execute the e.ents accordin to the time
schedule detailed below#
SNo. O0eration Dead.ine 4Duration
Action 5) or
3enue
+# Joint Admi!!ion Board-2012 : =ir!t Meetin& 0* -uust 0%++, @riday IITD
0# 1
st
JIC-2012 Meeting at IIT Delhi
0*&0< -uust 0%++,
@riday&,unday
IITD
4#
"elease o( ,hort -d.ertisement >Enlish and :indi? (or JEE&0%+0
in leadin newspaper and on website
4% ,eptember 0%++,
@riday
IITD

;.
2nd JIC meeting at IIT Delhi
(In!truction! to !etter!+ on ORS and 0re0aration! "or *ONOS)
1>-1? Octo5er 2011+
Saturda)-Sunda)
IIT De.$i
$#
"elease o( =on ad.ertisement o( IIT&JEE 0%+0 in Employment
5ews, "ojar ,amachar and 5ational Dailies
00 7ctober 0%++,
,aturday
IITD
*# 9pload (ull -d.ertisement and IB >1D@? (ile on the Cebsite
00 7ctober 0%++,
,aturday
IITD

5
SNo. O0eration Dead.ine 4Duration
Action 5) or
3enue
;# On.ine a00.ication 1e5!ite o0en! "or candidate!
81 Octo5er 2011+
Monda)
IITD
?. ,tart date (or ,ale o( o((line 7!" and IBs at Bank counters
++ 5o.ember 0%++,
@riday
Honal
)# =ast date (or online application reistration at $ 1! +% Dec# 0%++, ,aturday IITD
+%# 9a!t date (or issue o( application (orms (rom Banks
$ December 0%++,
!onday
Honal
++# 37571,
;&0% December
+*&0) December
-==
+0# =ast date (or "eceipt o( (illed >7!"? at respecti.e IITs
$ 1!, +$ December
0%++, Thursday
Honal
18.
3
rd
JIC Meeting at IIT Guwahati
(JIPS, Guide lines finaliati!n, e"#hanging inter !nal
a$$li#ati!ns et#%
20-28 Januar) 2012+
=rida)-Saturda)
IIT(
1;. ;
t$
JI* Meetin& (to 5e !)nc$roni,ed 1it$ 2
nd
JAB-2012)
1@-1? =e5ruar) 2012+

IITD
1<.
&
th
JIC Meeting at IIT '!m(a)
>keys handin o.er)
2; Marc$ 2012+
Saturda)
IITB
+*# -2amination IIT-J-- 2012 0? A0ri. 2012+ Sunda) Honal
+;# 3odin 7perations >+% days operation?
++&0% -pril 0%+0,
Thursday I !onday
Honal
+<# ,tartin date (or machine readin o( 7",
0% &0 !ay 0%+0,
!onday
Honal
+)#
*
th
JIC Meeting at IIT Madras
("ree,e !o.ution)
2A
t$
A0ri. 2012

IITM
0%# -nswer&Keys 1ublished in website %; !ay 0%+0, !onday IITD
21.
+
th
JIC Meeting at IIT Delhi
("or 0roce!!in& and 0re0aration o" J-- B 2012 Re!u.t)
1;-1> Ma)+ 2012
Monda) B Cedne!da)
IITD
00#
Dec.aration o" IIT-J-- 2012 Re!u.t! (inc.udin& re0arator))
t$rou&$ 1e5!ite and I3RS and date! "or coun!e.in&.
1? Ma) 2012+ =rida)+
?:00AM
Honal
04# On.ine c$oice "i..in& "or a.. cate&orie! (1? da)!)
1A Ma)-10 June+ 2012
Saturda) B Sunda)
IITD
08# Ce5 di!0.a) o" ORS o" a.. candidate! (1A da)!)
21 Ma) -? June 2012
Monda)-=rida)
Honal
0$# o!tin& o" ca.. .etter! "or coun!e..in&
0+&00 !ay 0%+0,
!onday&Tuesday
Honal
0*# 7nline reistration 2enue bookin (or -D-1T 0$ !ay 0%+0, @riday Honal
0;# -rchitecture and Desin -ptitude Test %4 June 0%+0, ,unday -ll IITs
0<# !edical Examination (or Juali(ied 1D candidates
%4 &%* June,
!onday & Tuesday
-ll IITs
0)# Declaration o( -ptitude Test "esults %< June 0%+0, @riday IITD
4%# *.o!ure o" J*O 0orta. "or c$oice re&i!tration +% June 0%+0, ,unday Honal
81.
,
th
JIC Meeting at IIT Delhi
-f!r .irst r!und #!urse all!#ati!n%
11-1> June 2012+

IITD
40# Cebsite release o( (irst round course allocation results
A AM+ +8 June 0%+0,
Thursday
IITD
44#
/
th
0ight JIC Meeting at IIT Delhi
("or 8
rd
round a..ocation D e2c$an&in& t$e ori&ina.
a00.ication!)
28 Ju.) 2012+

IITD

6
SNo. O0eration Dead.ine 4Duration
Action 5) or
3enue
48#
Cebsite release o( second round course allocation results A AM+ 0$ June 0%+0,
!onday
IITD
4$#
10
th
0ight JIC Meeting at IIT Delhi
("or 8
rd
round a..ocation D e2c$an&in& t$e ori&ina.
a00.ication!)
10-12 Ju.) 2012+

IITD
4*#
Cebsite release o( third round course allocation results ) -!, * July 0%+0,
@riday
IITD
8@. 11
th
JIC Meeting -1e2iew meeting% 80 Ju.) 2012+Monda) IITR
4<# @inaliAation o( account statement
%* -uust 0%+0,
!onday
IITD
4)# @inaliAation o( "eport
0% -uust 0%+0,
!onday
IITD
8%# re JAB com5ined Meetin& o" JI*- 2012 D JI*-2018 0*&0; -uust 0%+0, IITD
8+# JAB Meetin& "or 2012 0; -uust 0%+0, IITD

The committee took the (ollowin major initiati.es/
a? Implemented carbon copy paper based 7ptical response sheet (or the (irst time in JEE
system#
b? Declared the cateory wise absolute cut&o(( marks >(or each subject and areate? (or
rankin the candidates well in ad.ance# This step in (act allowed the candidates to maximiAe
the areate marks a(ter ensurin the minimum marks in indi.idual subject# It de(initely
reduced the anxiety o( the kids preparin (or IIT&JEE#
c? Cell be(ore announcin the IIT&JEE 0%+0 results, we displayed the imaes o( the answer
sheets o( both papers o( 8;)*$+ candidates alon with the machine read answers and
in.ited the candidates to submit their re.iew reBuest in can they percei.e any error in
readin their responses# This decision o( was well recei.ed by the public# Ce ha.e set a
standard (or such examinations#
d? ,trenthened the security o( post&examination operation by not printin any identi(yin
marks such as scan numbers on 7",#
e? 1ro.ided DExitG option (or candidates who accepted the (irstFsecond allotted seat in
anticipation o( impro.ement# This decision also resulted in reducin the post&reistration
date .acancies# This year the number has come down to 48%, which is less than $%E o( the
.acant seats in precedin years#
(? 3on.erted the un(illed 1D seats back to respecti.e cateories# This step was thouht to be
not permissible in earlier years#
? 3onducted (our rounds o( seat allocation, payment o( reistration (ee as mark o( seat
acceptance without any technical sna#
h? 9sed open Buotations policy (or brinin transparency in material procurement process#

1.; 9e&a. Matter!
- summary o( the cases relatin to JEE 0%+0 is as (ollows/

S.No. Crit No. =i.ed 5) Statu!
+# C# 1# >3? 4*8<F+0
In the :ih 3ourt o(
Jharkhand, "anchi
Kamal Kumar 2s#
97I 6 7rs#
1etition (iled on the round that he was
eliible (or admission in IIT JEE 0%+0 as an 7B3
candidate# :is admission had been re(used as
he had submitted his 7B3 certi(icate a(ter the
due date# 1etition is (inally


7
S.No. Crit No. =i.ed 5) Statu!
0# C# 1# 5o#08<<*F+0
In the :ih 3ourt o(
-1 at
:yderabad
"# 5ikhil ,idharth
2s# 97I 6 7rs#
1etition reardin marks not bein awarded in
J# 5o# * o( 1aper II#
4# C# 1# >3? 5o# F+0
In the :ih 3ourt o(
Jharkhand, "anchi
Tausi( "aAa 2s#
97I 6 7rs#
1etition to Buash the letter dt# *F;F+0 rejectin
the Enlish .ersion o( submitted 7B3
3erti(icate in which the caste is not mentioned
8# C# 1# >3? 00;$F0%+%
In the :ih 3ourt o(
Delhi
Dr# "ajee. Kumar
2s#97I 6 7rs#
"eardin (ormation o( a transparent and
accountable mechanism, to minimiAe
irreularities in JEEs and (ormulation o( a sinle
examination to enineerin institutions#
7noin#
$# C# 1# >3? ;;$0F++ in
the :ih 3ourt o(
Delhi
5itul Datt 2s# 97I
6 7rs#
"eardin 2acant ,eat (or the last (i.e years#
7noin#
*# C# 1# 5o# <)%%F+0
In the :ih 3ourt
!adras
-# 5andhini
2s#97I 6 7rs#
1rayer to issue admit card despite not (illin
the online application (orm# Disposed o(( in
(a.or o( IIT&JEE#
;# 3C1 5o# )++)F+0 in
the :ih 3ourt o(
"ajasthan>Jaipur?
,yed -(shan -li
2s# 3hairman, JEE
IIT Delhi
"eser.ation pro.ided (or and not declarin
result o( the petitioner in 7B3>53=?&!inority
cateory despite submittin the cateory
certi(icate# 1etition withdrawn by the
petitioner#
<# C# 1# 5o# +$$)4F+0
In the :ih 3ourt o(
-ndhara 1radesh
,# CaAeed Baba
2s# 97I 6 7rs#
1etition to (ill up the seats as per the 8#$ E
reser.ation under 7B3>53=? minorities
)# ,=1 >3? *%;F0%++ in
the :ih 3ourt o(
-llahabad
,ujeet 3haudhary
.s# 9 o( I and 7rs#
-ppeal Buestionin the decision to not allow
those who ha.e taken admission or accepted
the admission by payin the reistration (ee at
any o( the IITs to write JEE aain# -ppeal
rejected but considerin the circumstances a
seat miht be o((ered in JEE&0%+0, i( conditions
permit and without any obliation#

+%# C# 1# >3? 5o# 0%+0 in
the :ih 3ourt o(
Delhi
-dil Ir(an 2s# 97I
6 ors#
1etition seekin consideration in the 7B3
>53=?&!inority cateory despite not pro.idin
the declaration in time# 1etition rejected#
++# =1->3i.il? 5o# o(
0%+0
1rateek "ohilla
2s# IIT Delhi 6
7rs#
-ppeal by the petitioner to appear in JEE 0%+0
althouh he rejected the seat a(ter payin the
reistration (ees to accept the seat o((ered to
him in JEE&0%++# -ppeal rejected#
+0# C1>1I=?57#++06+84
o( 0%++ in Gujarat
:ih 3ourt
,hree ,ayaji
2aibha. ,#1# 2s#
97I 6 ors#
1I= (iled reardin induction o( Gujarati
lanuae in JEE Buestion paper#
+4# C1 >3? 4;;;F0%+0 in
the Delhi :ih 3ourt
-mit Kumar 2s#
IIT Delhi
1etition challenin the !edical Board
assessment that he did not meet the minimum
physical disability reBuirements (or
consideration in the 1D cateory#
+8# 3omplaint to the 1D
3ommissioner
5auman -nsari
2s# IIT Delhi
"eardin depri.ation o( 1D entitlement
despite ha.in <0E disability# 1etition ranted#
+$# C1 5o#+$;<8F0%+0
In the :ih 3ourt o(
!adras
2# ,athis Kumar
2s# Dist# 3ollector
6 IIT Delhi
Direction to respondent K+ to issue a caste
certi(icate#

8
S.No. Crit No. =i.ed 5) Statu!
+*# 3C1 5o#++)*8F+0
In the :ih 3ourt o(
1unjab 6 :aryana,
3handiarh
-bhina. 2s# IIT
"oorkee, IIT
Delhi, and ,D!
>3handiarh?
"eardin rejection o( 7B3 certi(icate issued
be(ore + Jan 0%+0#
+;# 3C1 5o#*;+8F0%+0
In the :ih 3ourt o(
"aj at Jodhpur
,hikha 5aal 2s#
97I 6 7rs#
"eardin not considerin the petitioner as
7B3 (or admission#
+<# C1>!D?5o#;%;<F+0
In the :ih 3ourt o(
!adras & !adurai
Bench
2# :arshan 2s#
3hairman JEE IIT
!adras 6 IITD
,eekin a chane (rom General 3ateory to
7B3 a(ter result declaration#
+)# ,B3C1 5o#)448F+0
in the :ih 3ourt o(
"ajasthan
-run ,inh
,hekhawat 2s#
97I 6 7rs#
@iled petition (or inclusion in the counsellin
process#

0%#
C# 1# 4<%0F0%+0 in
the :ih 3ourt o(
!adhya 1radesh I
Gwalior Bench
"ajnandhini
,harma .s# 9 o( I
and 7rs#
"edress (or problems ensuin (rom the wron
Buestions in paper 0#


S-*TION II

1. IIT-J-- 2012 Re!u.t!

The Joint Entrance Examination (or the year 0%+0 >IIT&JEE 0%+0? was conducted on ,unday, -pril <,
0%+0 at 10>@ examination centres in +44 cities all o.er India and also in Dubai city# 7( the $%*8<8
candidates reistered (or IIT JEE, 8;)*$+ appeared in both papers# The results o( IIT&JEE 0%+0 were
announced as per schedule on !ay +<, 0%+0# The results were processed as per the decisions made
in the Joint -dmissions Board >J-B? meetin held on +* 7ctober 0%++ at IIT Delhi# The results were
displayed on the JEE websites >o( the se.en Aones? and on notice boards o( se.en IITs#

The Table below pro.ides a brie( cateory&wise summary o( the number o( candidates who
appeared and Buali(ied in the examination#


- common merit list >3!=? o( 1??>? candidates was prepared keepin 4$E marks o( areate as
cut&o(( and +%E marks in each subject# This list contains 1;<A1 General >GE?, 8;;A 7B3, 8;0 ,3 and
?? ,T# This list also includes 82 candidates who declared themsel.es as (orein nationals#

,eparate merit lists were prepared (or 7B3, ,3, ,T and 1D candidates with relaxations o( +%E, $%E,
$%E and $%E o( marks in subject le.el and areate marks respecti.ely# These lists contained ;?<8
7B3, 8;>< ,3, 1112 ,T and 1>@ 1D candidates#

- total o( 2;2< 1D candidates >sel( declared? appeared in IIT&JEE 0%+0 and 1>@ o( them Buali(ied
based on the relaxed norms# 7ut o( these 101 were GE1D, >0 were 7B31D and > were ,31D
candidates#

In all 2;112 candidates Buali(ied in IIT&JEE 0%+0#

*andidate! (- OB* S* ST Tota.
A00eared 0;;)4+ +4*$;% 8**+% +<$8% 8;)*$+
7ua.i"ied +8*<0 8<$4 48*$ +++0 08++0

9
IIT&JEE0%+0 was conducted (or admissions to +$ IITs, ITB:9 and I,! Dhanbad# The (i(teen IITs are at
Bhubaneswar, Bombay, Delhi, Gandhinaar, Guwahati, :yderabad, Indore, Kanpur, Kharapur,
!adras, !andi, 1atna, "ajasthan, "oorkee and "opar# The total number o( seats a.ailable in these
+; institutions across all cateories was A>;@#

-s per the directi.es o( the 3hie( 3ommissioner (or 1erson with disabilities and decision o( the J-B,
4E o( the seats a.ailable in each .ertical cateory were reser.ed (or 1D candidates# - roster system
to reser.e the 1D seats across .arious institutes and courses was (ollowed in 0%+0 continuin on the
0%+% roster#

The breakup o( seats (or di((erent cateories across all the +; institutes is as (ollows/
(- OB* S* ST Tota.
Tota. Seat! a%ai.a5.e 8;00 0$4* +8%4 ;%< A8>A
=or D candidate! +4< ;; 84 0% 2@?

2. *oun!e..in&

7( the 08++0 Buali(ied candidates,
+;8*$ candidates were shortlisted (or
seat allocation# -monst these +*40$
candidates reistered online (or the
counsellin and paid the (ee# 7nly
+$<)4 candidates (illed the course
choices# Hone&wise data is shown in
the table#

8. Medica. Board -2amination
This year medical boards (or .eri(yin
the 1D status o( the candidates Buali(ied under 1D cateory and 1D preparatory candidates were conducted
on 8
th
, $
th
and *
th
June 0%+0 in Bombay, Delhi, Guwahati, Kanpur, Kharapur and !adras# -ll 1D candidates
had to reister online (or a medical examination at one o( the !edical board .enues# 7( the +*; 1D
candidates, +0) candidates were (ound to eliible (or 1D seats in IITs#

;. *andidate! not "i..ed c$oice!
7ut o( the <%4% GE candidates in the 3!=, $+8 did not (ill the course choices# -monst the 8<$4 7B3
candidates, $;4 did not (ill the choice sheets# In the ,3 cateory, 444 candidates o( the 48** did not exercise
their choice whilst in the ,T case it was $) out o( +++0# -ll except one o( the +0) 1D candidates (illed the
choices#

<. AAT-2012 Te!t
The --T&0%+0 test was administered at all the se.en
IITs on 4
rd
June between )/%% am and +0 5oon# - total
o( ;0* candidates wrote the test# The Aone&wise
numbers o( candidates reistered is i.en in Table L+#
The aptitude test (or -rchitecture was conducted#

The cuto(( mark (or Buali(yin the aptitude test was
(ixed at 4$E >+%$ marks? o( the maximum in
consultation with the e.aluatin (aculty members#

>. *oun!e..in& !tati!tic!
7ut o( the +*40$ candidates who were eliible to (ill
the choice sheets, 840 did not (ill the choices# The (ollowin tables summariAe the allocations Aone wise#
In!titute
(,one)
*andidate!
7ua.i"ied
*a..ed "or
*oun!e..in&
*andidate! 1$o 0aid
coun!e..in& "ee!
IIT Bombay $$*0 808% 8%+4
IIT Delhi 8+%< 0)%* 0;0;
IIT Guwahati +0<% );+ )+)
IIT Kanpur 0)4< 0+%0 +)<%
IIT Kharapur 0*+* +<*4 +;+8
IIT !adras $%%8 4*** 40*$
IIT "oorkee 0*%8 +;+; +*+;
Total 08++0 +;8*$ +*04$
Ta5.e 21: Eone 1i!e num5er o" candidate!
re&i!tered "or Arc$itecture A0titude Te!t -2012
In!titute (,one) *andidate!
attended
*andidate!
7ua.i"ied
IIT Bom5a) << ;0
IIT De.$i 0)+ 04%
IIT (u1a$ati 04 +)
IIT #an0ur +++ ;8
IIT #$ara&0ur <8 **
IIT Madra! <% $)
IIT Roor'ee 8) 4%
Tota. @2> <<0

10




@. =ir!t Round !eat A..ocation
- total number o( )$%% candidates were
allotted seats in the (irst round o( seat
allotment o( which )%;4 candidates paid the
(ees to accept the o((er o( admission# These
)%;4 candidates were also eliible (or the
subseBuent rounds o( seat allocation and an
uprade o( their choice, i( permissible# The 80; who did not pay the reistration (ee were eliminated (rom
(urther rounds o( the counsellin# In the second round, 848 candidates were allotted seats a(resh, while in
the third round this number was *8+# The number o( candidates whose seat underwent a chane between
the (irst and second round was 0%$+ while this number was 0$8) between the second and third rounds#

(- (-D OB* OB*D S* S*D ST SD Tota.
Seat! a%ai.a5.e 8;00 +4< 0$4* ;; +8%4 84 ;%< 0% )*8;
*andidate! 1$o
"i..ed c$oice
!$eet!
;80< 80<% 4+40 +%$4 +$<)4
Seat! a..otted

8;*+ 0*8< +880 ;0$ A<@>

-s is e.ident (rom the table below, the number o( boys allotted seats in the +; institutes outnumbered the
irls sini(icantly#
!ale and (emale number o( candidates who
ot seat o((ers in all +; Institutes#
Ma.e =ema.e Tota.
IIT Bhubaneswar +%< +% ++<
IIT Bombay ;)4 << <<+
IIT !andi +%; +0 ++)
IIT Delhi ;$; )+ <8<
IIT Indore ); 00 ++)
IIT Kharapur ++<) +84 +440
IIT :yderabad +;* 04 +))
IIT "ajasthan +80 +* +$<
IIT Kanpur ;$4 ;0 <0$
IIT !adras ;0) +%8 <44
IIT Gandhinaar +%) ) ++<
IIT 1atna ++% ) ++)
IIT "oorkee +%0$ +08 ++8)
I,! Dhanbad <;< *; )8$
IIT "opar ++0 < +0%
IT&B:9 2aranasi )$) <4 +%80
IIT Guwahati $)$ $* *$+
Tota. ?>8A A8@ A<@>

No. Eone A..otted Not a..otted Tota.
+ Bombay 0$%* +;48 808%
0 Delhi +$); +4%) 0)%*
4 Guwahati $+* 8$$ );+
8 Kanpur ++0+ )<+ 0+%0
$ Kharapur ))$ <*< +<*4
* !adras +);% +*)* 4***
; "oorkee <;+ <8* +;+;
Tota. A<@> @??A 1@;><

11
The (ollowin table shows the candidates (rom .arious Aones who paid the reistration (ee a(ter the (irst,
second, third and (ourth round o( seat allotments/

5o# 1lace 5umber
+ IIT Bombay 0$%*
0 IIT Delhi +$);
4 IIT Guwahati $+*
8 IIT Kanpur ++0+
$ IIT Kharapur ))$
* IIT !adras +);%
; IIT "oorkee <;+
Total )$;*

The institute wise and ender and cateory wise seat allotment data is i.en below/

(enera. OB* S* ST Tota.
,eats a.ailable 8;00>+4<? 0$4*>;;? +8%4>84? ;%<>0%? )*8;
3andidates who
(illed choice sheets
;80< 80<% 4+40 +%$4 +$<)4
,eats allotted

8;*+ 0*8< +880 ;0$ A<@>
In the table abo.e, the number in paranthesis is the number o( seats reser.ed (or persons with disability#

<# Su0ernumerar) !eat!
Ten >+%? supernumerary seats were created due mainly to issues related to the cateory certi(icates# In
addition, the (ollowin ten (orein national candidates were allotted supernumerary seats/
+%8+%<$ >B8+0$?, +%8+4;; >B8++;?, 0%$8$<8 >J8+0$?, $%;;0$$ >98+++?, *%+)$%+ >G$$%8?, *%<)4$0
>!$0+;?, *%)84<) >K80%+?, *%)$0;8 G8+%+?, *%)$4*0 >D8++;?, *+0*++8 >!8+%;?#

A. re0arator) *our!e *oun!e..in& and !eat a..ocation
5o ,3 or ,T preparatory list was made since the number o( Buali(ied candidates exceeded +#8 times the
number o( seats in the respecti.e cateories# - total +$< seats were trans(erred to 1D preparatory course
a(ter makin allotment to reular 1D candidates# The Aone&wise number o( Buali(i(ed preparatory 1D
candidates is i.en in the table below/
Bombay Delhi Guwahati Kanpur Kharapur !adras "oorkee Total
1rep# 1D Buali(ied 4< 00 8* 4% 44 8% 08 044
1rep# 1D attended 00 +8 0< +$ 0+ 00 8 +0*
!edical examinations o( the preparatory 1D candidates were carried out alon with the 1D candidates as
stated earlier# The Aone wise distribution o( candidates and the numbers who attended the medical
examination are also i.en abo.e# -monst these $) GE1D, $% 7B31D and * ,31D candidates were allowed
to (ill the choices online (or the preparatory course# 7( the +$< seats earmarked (or the preparatory courses
in the +; institutions, only <0 candidates were allotted seats# The .acant preparatory seats were trans(erred
to their respecti.e cateories#


STATISTI*A9 ANA9FSIS O= J-- 2012 A9I*ATIONS

Section A: Re&i!tration data and trend!
The Aone wise distribution o( the total number o( appeared and Buali(ied candidates alon with their
cateory are i.en in Ta5.e! A1 and A2# 7ut o( a total o( $%*8<8 >in JEE&0%++ I 8<$+4*? candidates who
reistered in all Aones, 8;)*$+ >in JEE&0%++ 8*<0<%, )*#$E? candidates >)8#;E? appeared (or the
examination# This represents an increase in the number o( candidates relati.e to 0%++, which howe.er is
o((set by an increase in the absentees by almost two percentae points# - total o( 08++0 >$#%0E? candidates

12
Buali(ied (or counsellin# This cannot be compared with the data in 0%++ as the Buali(ication criteria adopted
in the two years were di((erent#

The Aone wise distribution o( Buali(ied candidates is/ Bombay $$*0 >04#%*E? >in JEE&0%++ I408<, 08#*E?,
Delhi 8+%< >+;#%4E? >in JEE&0%++ I0+%*, +$#)E?, Guwahati +0<% >$#4+E? >in JEE&0%++ I$48, 8#%8E?, Kanpur
0)4< >+0#4<E? >in JEE&0%++ I+$04, ++#$8E?, Kharapur 0*+* >+%#<8E? >in JEE&0%++ I+$++, ++#8E?, !adras
$%%8 >0%#;$E? >in JEE&0%++ I4%8), 04#+E? and "oorkee 0*%8 >+%#<%E? >in JEE&0%++ I+00$, )#0<E?# The
percentaes are comparable with the data o( JEE 0%+%#

*ate&or)-1i!e di!tri5ution

The 3ateory wise distribution o( appeared candidates is shown in Ta5.e A1# $;#)$E o( the candidates who
appeared in JEE 0%+0 are GE candidates, 0<#8;E are 7B3 candidates, )#;0E are ,3 candidates and 4#<;E are
,T candidates#

The 3ateory wise distribution o( Buali(ied candidates is shown in Ta5.e A2# *%#8;E o( the Buali(ied
candidates were GE candidates, +)#<;E were 7B3 candidates, +8#48E were ,3 candidates, 8#*+E were ,T
candidates, and %#*)0E were 1D candidates#

Despite the di((erent Buali(ication criteria adopted in 0%++ and 0%+0, the cateory&wise distribution does not
show a marked chane#

*it) o" ori&in o" a00.icant!

It was obser.ed that +$ cities accounted (or $%E o( the reistered candidates >see Ta5.e A8?# 1atna led the
way with more than 4<%%%, (ollowed by Delhi and Jaipur with 4*,%%% and 48,%%% respecti.ely# The (ourth
biest city, :yderabad, had almost +%%%% less than Jaipur#

(ender 1i!e di!tri5ution

Ta5.e A10 shows the Aone wise distribution o( reistered, Buali(ied, counseled, and admitted candidates
accordin to ender# The number o( (emale candidates reistered in JEE&0%+0 is +*<$*<, which is 44#0<E o(
the total reistered candidates# 7ut o( the 08++0 candidates who Buali(ied, 0<<* are (emale candidates
>++#);E?# In JEE 0%++, +%<*$44 (emale candidates appeared >04#0E? and +884 Buali(ied >++#0E?# 1resumably
as a result o( the drastic reduction o( the application (ees (or irls, a ten percentae point increase in the
(emale reistration obser.ed# Disconcertinly, this increase has only a marinal increase in the percentae o(
Buali(ied (emale candidates#

Num5er o" attem0t!

The data shown in Ta5.e A1< re.eals that close to *%E o( the Buali(ied candidates did so in their (irst
attempt# 3andidates attemptin JEE (or the second ha.e a hiher success rate# Ele.en percent >++E? o( such
reistered candidates Buali(ied in the examination while this number reduced to three percent (or those
appearin in the JEE (or the (irst time#

TR-ND ANA9FSIS

Trend analysis has been carried out usin historical data# Table B+ captures the trend in the number o(
reistered candidates (or the last +$ years# The number o( candidates reistered shows a more than $&(old
increase in the last +$ years, reachin an all time hih o( $%*8<8 total reistered candidates in the year 0%+0#
The increase in the number o( total reistered candidates in 0%+0 as compared to the same in 0%++ is
howe.er only about 8#8 E, as compared to about 0 E increase (rom 0%+% to 0%++, which is, in all likelihood
the result o( decreasin the application (ee (or (emales#


13
Interpretin the Aone&wise data o( reistered candidate o( 0%+0 and especially the comparison with 0%++
reBuires caution as there was a reoraniAation o( centers between Bombay, Delhi, and "oorkee so as to
control the increasinly unmanaeable numbers in the Bombay Aone# The openin o( centers in -lwar and
,ikar alon with the trans(er o( 9daipur to Delhi has eased the situation in Jaipur as e.idenced by the
reduction in Bombay by almost +%E# !adras has shown a tremendous jump, close to +$E increase, between
0%++ and 0%+0#

Table B0 captures the trend in terms o( the candidates belonin to .arious cateories# The number o( GE
candidates has increased approximately t1o times in the last ten years, whereas, o.er the same period, the
number o( ,3 and ,T candidates has increased "our and !i2 times, respecti.ely# This may be attributed to the
increase in the number o( seats a.ailable in the .arious reser.ed cateories and due to the importance i.en
to JEE by the eliible students in the .arious cateories# The number o( 7B3, ,3, and ,T cateory candidates
has relati.ely remained unchaned between 0%++ and 0%+0#

Table B4 captures the trend in terms o( the lanuae o( Buestion paper used# -pproximately <$ E o( the
candidates used Enlish Buestion paper and about +$E used the :indi Buestion paper in the JEE& 0%+0 as
was the case in 0%++ and 0%+%# Till about the mid 0%%%s this ratio was close to )% E (or Enlish and +% E (or
:indi and has increased to the present ratio#

Table B8 captures the trend in terms o( number o( attempts# In JEE&0%+0, about <% E o( the candidates ha.e
attempted JEE (or the (irst time and about 0% E ha.e attempted JEE (or the second time# -s can be seen in
Table B8, since 0%%;, except (or minor di((erences this ratio has remained constant and may be attributed to
the introduction o( a ceilin on the number o( attempts allowed in JEE#

Table B$ captures the ender&wise trend in the number o( reistered candidates# Expectedly, the reduction
in the application (ee (or (emales has led to an increase in the (raction o( irls reisterin (or JEE# In the
+))%s the ratio was close to +% to + in (a.or o( boys, which decreased to ; to + in the early 0%%%s, to 8 to + in
the mid and late 0%%%s, to 0 to + in 0%+0# In 0%++ it was obser.ed that this ratio Dis approachin close to +
(emale candidate (or e.ery three male candidatesG#

J---2012 Re!u.t Ana.)!i!
JEE&0%+0 Juestion paper

JEE&0%+0 had two papers' each had three parts & 1hysics, 3hemistry, and !athematics# In both the papers,
parts +, 0, and 4 contained 0% Buestions each in 1hysics, 3hemistry, and !athematics, respecti.ely# The
Buestions were numbered consecuti.ely in both the papers#

In 1aper&+, each part had three sections# ,ection&+ had +% multiple choice Buestions each ha.in one correct
answer with maximum o( 4 marks' ,ection&0 had $ multiple choice Buestions each ha.in one or more
correct answer>s? with maximum o( 8 marks' ,ection&4 had $ inteer answer type Buestions each ha.in
maximum o( 8 marks# There were neati.e markins (or wron answers in ,ection&+, but no neati.e
markins in ,ections&0 and 4#

In 1aper&0, each part had three sections# ,ection&+ had < multiple choice Buestions each ha.in one correct
answer with maximum o( 4 marks' ,ection&0 had * multiple choice Buestions relatin to three Buestions with
0 Buestions on each pararaph and ha.in only one correct answer with maximum o( 4 marks' ,ection&4 had
< multiple choice Buestions each ha.in one correct answer with maximum o( 8 marks# There were neati.e
markins (or wron answers in ,ection&+ and ,ection&0, but not in ,ection 4#

- candidate could ha.e scored anythin between M4% to 0+% in 1aper&+, and between M80 to +)< in 1aper&0#
That is, marks o( a candidate miht ha.e taken any .alue between M;0 to 8%<, with the minimum and
maximum possible marks in each subject bein M08 and +4*, respecti.ely# In two Buestions, one each in
3hemistry and !athematics o( 1aper 0 worth 4 and 8 marks respecti.ely, all candidates were awarded Aero

14
marks# There(ore, the minimum and maximum possible marks in the 3hemistry part would be M04 and +44
while that o( !athematics would be M08 and +40 respecti.ely#

"elaxations o( +%E and o( $%E were i.en on the a.erae marks in each subject (or considerin the 7B3 and
,3F,TF1D cateory candidates (or rankin#

The minimum mark scored was M*8 >minus sixty (our? and the maximum mark was 4<$# The rounded o((
a.erae marks secured in 1hysics, 3hemistry, and !athematics by the candidates were +*, +;, and +4,
respecti.ely# The (ollowin are a (ew obser.ations reardin the per(ormance o( candidates in JEE&0%+0#

+# The hihest areate marks scored by a candidate in JEE&0%+0 were 4<$, that is, )*#%E o( 8%+
marks#
0# 7nly 0; candidates scored abo.e 4$% marks# 0;$ candidates scored abo.e 4%% marks#
4# The mark scored by the last ranked candidate in the 3ommon !erit =ist >3!=? was +8+# This was the
areate cut&o(( (or 3!=#
8# The maximum marks scored out o( +4* in 3hemistry, 1hysics, and !athematics were +44, +40, and
+40 marks#
$# The number o( candidates who scored more than +0% in 3hemistry, 1hysics, and !athematics were
respecti.ely 4+, +;, and 4<, respecti.ely#
*# The minimum marks scored in 3hemistry, 1hysics, and !athematics by candidates in 3!= were +8,
+8, and +8, respecti.ely# In (act, there were many candidates with relati.ely poor per(ormance in a
particular subject despite ha.in hih areate marks#

It is obser.ed that there had been .ery low cut&o(( marks in indi.idual subjects in JEE (or the past (ew years#
,ince time manaement skill has more e((ect in a competiti.e examination like JEE, the low marks scored in a
particular subject alon with hih areate score does not necessarily establish the candidateNs low
pro(iciency in that subject# There(ore, minimum le.el o( pro(iciency in each o( the three subjects, e.en
thouh with low indi.idual cut&o(( scores, as demanded in JEE is reasonable#

- (reBuency distribution o( candidates accordin to their marks in the three subjects and the areate
marks are presented in the (iures on paes 0%&04# It may be noted that each o( the raphs in the (iures is
skewed to the le(t# Thouh the rane o( scores o( a candidate in 1hysics was &08 to +4* and 3hemistry was
M04 to +44, and that in !athematics is (rom M08 to +40, the rounded o(( means >+;, +* and +4? o( these
distributions are much lower than the mid points o( the modes# The distributions o( the subject marks are
almost identical with that o( the areate marks#

,ince the aim o( the JEE is to sinle out about +%%%% best candidates out o( about $ lakh candidates, the
Buestions are (ramed with a hih le.el o( di((iculty# The hihest score in JEE&0%+0 is 4<$ out o( 8%+, i#e,
)*#%E# This was )+#;E in JEE&0%++, <$#$E in JEE&0%+%, <<#4E in JEE&0%%) and <<#$E in JEE&0%%<# =ookin at
the competiti.eness o( the examination, the hihest score is up to the mark# It is also e.ident that the
di((iculty le.el o( the Buestion papers in JEE&0%+0 has decreased substantially# The Buestion paper setters
were i.en uidelines to (rame Buestions in such a way that at least 4%E o( the Buestions can be attempted
by any candidate with ood preparation (or the board examinant#

- detailed analysis o( the number o( candidates attemptin each Buestion in the three parts o( both the
papers, number who ot the Buestion riht who le(t the Buestion blank is pro.ided in the (ollowin tables/

15

A-R 1: GFSI*S
S-*TION I
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) ar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: 10
Num5er o" attem0t! ercenta&e o" attem0t!
7.No. *orrect re!0on!e Cron& re!0on!e B.an' H o" *orrect Re!0on!e H o" 1ron& Re!0on!e B.an' 0ecenta&e
+ <%00; 004%4$ +;*4<) +*#;4 8*#$% 4*#;;
0 ;;)4% +++*4; 0)%%<8 +*#0$ 04#0; *%#8<
4 +8<)$4 +)4$4< +4;+*% 4+#%$ 8%#4$ 0<#*%
8 $0$*; +<4$4+ 084$$4 +%#)* 4<#0* $%#;<
$ ;;;8% +4*40$ 0*$$<* +*#0+ 0<#80 $$#4;
* 00%<8+ +<;<+) ;%))+ 8*#%8 4)#+* +8#<%
; <0;+; 04%0<4 +***$+ +;#0$ 8<#%+ 48#;8
< +%44$< +<8+84 +)0+$% 0+#$$ 4<#4) 8%#%*
) *<$%$ +04$00 0<;*08 +8#0< 0$#;$ $)#);
+% ;;<00 +)44<* 0%<884 +*#00 8%#40 84#8*
S-*TION II
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
++ +%*$80 44*;;+ 4*44< 00#0+ ;%#0+ ;#$<
+0 *0;0$ 4<%8)8 4*840 +4#%< ;)#44 ;#*%
+4 +%)8<$ 48)008 0%)80 00#<4 ;0#<+ 8#4;
+8 8*04* 4)+<04 8+$)0 )#*8 <+#*) <#*;
+$ +<044) 0*8%8% 440;0 4<#%+ $$#%$ *#)8
S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
+* 4$0*% 4*4);) <%8+0 ;#4$ ;$#<< +*#;*
+; 8)+)0 4$$%8) ;$8+% +%#0* ;8#%0 +$#;0
+< *%*$+ 4$))$< $)%80 +0#*8 ;$#%$ +0#4+
+) 00$%0 4;;084 ;))%* 8#*) ;<#*$ +*#**
0% $8)%% 44)8<0 <$0*) ++#8$ ;%#;< +;#;<

A-R 2: GFSI*S
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) mar'
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: ?
*orrect re!0on!e Cron& re!0on!e B.an' H o" *orrect Re!0on!e H o" 1ron& Re!0on!e B.an' 0ecenta&e

Num5er o" attem0t! ercenta&e o" attem0t!
+ +40%8< +$;;8* +<)<$; 0;#$4 40#<) 4)#$<
0 ;8;+* 0*4%)0 +8+<84 +$#$< $8#<$ 0)#$;
4 ;$)0; +)$+;+ 0%<$$4 +$#<4 8%#*) 84#8<
8 +*;$4< +;0)<< +4)+0$ 48#)4 4*#%; 0)#%+
$ $4)$0 +;)%4< 08***+ ++#0$ 4;#44 $+#84
* +%048$ +$4$)0 004;+8 0+#48 40#%0 8*#*8
; $;%$8 +4*)$% 0<$*8; ++#<) 0<#$$ $)#$$
< +8%*)+ +<;$;$ +$+4<$ 0)#44 4)#++ 4+#$*
S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) mar'
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
) +<<4)8 0+);$% ;+$%; 4)#0< 8$#<+ +8#)+
+% 04<08* +$0$4* <<<*) 8)#*; 4+#<% +<#$4
++ )+$$; 0<04;0 +%$;00 +)#%) $<#<; 00#%8
+0 $)**< 0*%$0$ +$)8$< +0#88 $8#40 44#08
+4 8;%<0 04+);; 0%%$)0 )#<0 8<#4* 8+#<0
+8 ++%<8$ +;88*; +)844) 04#++ 4*#4; 8%#$0

S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
+$ *+;8; 4;04%0 8$*%0 +0#<; ;;#*0 )#$+
+* **$+) 4)**<4 +*88) +4#<; <0#;% 4#84
+; 8;)4; 8+<$%8 +40+% )#)) <;#0$ 0#;$
+< 0<%*; 80;%$8 08$4% $#<$ <)#%4 $#++
+) ++$8<+ 44$$*) 0<*%+ 08#%< *)#)* $#)*
0% $4;00 4**8;+ $)8$< ++#0% ;*#8% +0#8%


16

A-R 1: *G-MISTRF
S-*TION I
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) ar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: 10
Num5er o" attem0t! ercenta&e o" attem0t!
7.No. *orrect re!0on!e Cron& re!0on!e B.an' H o" *orrect Re!0on!e H o" 1ron& Re!0on!e B.an' 0ecenta&e
0+ +*+4*; 08<<08 *)8*% 44#*8 $+#<< +8#8<
00 +0%<8< );+88 0*+*$) 0$#+) 0%#0$ $8#$$
04 ++0<4* 0%+<%< +*$%%; 04#$0 80#%; 48#8%
08 +)*88< +<<04; )8)** 8%#)* 4)#08 +)#<%
0$ +%44+0 0%;%;% +*)0*) 0+#$8 84#+; 4$#0)
0* <<<;4 0<;)*< +%0<+% +<#$4 *%#%8 0+#84
0; +$%;)% 0%*<<4 +0+);< 4+#88 84#+4 0$#84
0< ;8)08 04;00+ +*;$%* +$#*0 8)#8* 48#)0
0) 04+;0% +<0);$ *8)$* 8<#4+ 4<#+$ +4#$8
4% +8$$;% 0)$*<; 4<4)8 4%#4$ *+#*$ <#%%
S-*TION II
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
4+ 8*;)* 4;<)0< $4)0; )#;* ;)#%% ++#08
40 8*;;% 4)%)88 8+)4; )#;$ <+#$+ <#;8
44 80$<+ 8+0**% 088+% <#<< <*#%4 $#%)
48 ))0<% 4$;44* 04%4$ 0%#;% ;8#$% 8#<%
4$ )8<** 4$4;<+ 4+%%8 +)#;< ;4#;* *#8*
S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
4* <%*<) 44$$<$ *44;; +*#<0 *)#)* +4#0+
4; ++%<+< 440)*0 4$<;+ 04#+% *)#80 ;#8<
4< $8*+4 4<+%%4 88%4$ ++#4) ;)#84 )#+<
4) ;8$+4 408$;; <%$*+ +$#$4 *;#*; +*#<%
8% +%+44* 4004+% $*%%$ 0+#+4 *;#0% ++#*<

A-R 2: *G-MISTRF
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) mar'
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: ?
*orrect re!0on!e Cron& re!0on!e B.an' H o" *orrect Re!0on!e H o" 1ron& Re!0on!e B.an' 0ecenta&e

Num5er o" attem0t! ercenta&e o" attem0t!
0+ +;%;)4 +8+))8 +**<*8 4$#*+ 0)#*% 48#;)
00 +%$+<+ 0488%< +8%%*0 0+#)4 8<#<; 0)#0%
04 % % % %#%% %#%% %#%%
08 +$8<$8 0;88*< $%40) 40#0< $;#00 +%#8)
0$ $48$4 +4*$+0 0<)*<* ++#+8 0<#8* *%#8%
0* <8%4) 080*)0 +$0)0% +;#$0 $%#*% 4+#<<
0; )%$)$ +)<*+; +)%84) +<#<) 8+#8+ 4)#;%
0< ;;)0* 0*;4*0 +484*4 +*#0$ $$#;8 0<#%+
S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) mar'
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
0) +%;8+8 08%08* +4+))+ 00#4) $%#%) 0;#$0
4% **<%8 +8*+;4 0***;8 +4#)4 4%#8; $$#*%
4+ ;+*%$ +$8)0; 0$4++) +8#)4 40#4% $0#;;
40 +84);8 +*$+<0 +;%8)$ 4%#%0 48#88 4$#$$
44 <$0** 0%8$)+ +<);)8 +;#;< 80#*$ 4)#$;
48 <)+;; +<*;0+ 0%4;$4 +<#$) 4<#)4 80#8<

S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
4$ +%+$<+ 4*8048 +4<4* 0+#+< ;$#)8 0#<<
4* +++8+% 48+))+ 0*0$% 04#04 ;+#4% $#8;
4; 480+0 8+$4*) 4%%;% ;#+4 <*#*% *#0;
4< *+%4) 8+4+)4 $8+) +0#;4 <*#+8 +#+4
4) 4+)+; 8+%+*8 4;$;% *#*$ <$#$+ ;#<4
8% 8<;*) 8+;%<* +4;)* +%#+; <*#)* 0#<<


17

A-R 1: MATG-MATI*S
S-*TION I
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) ar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in in t$i! !ection: 10
Num5er o" attem0t! ercenta&e o" attem0t!
7.No. *orrect re!0on!e Cron& re!0on!e B.an' H o" *orrect Re!0on!e H o" 1ron& Re!0on!e B.an' 0ecenta&e
8+ <8;0% 0%4$)+ +)+48% +;#** 80#8$ 4)#<)
80 <8)8< 0$+%)0 +84*++ +;#;+ $0#4$ 0)#)8
84 ;+444 0*+$<% +8*;4< +8#<; $8#$8 4%#$)
88 +)0)0) +4;48* +8)4;* 8%#00 0<#*4 4+#+8
8$ *;$)4 0+)0*8 +)0;)8 +8#%) 8$#;+ 8%#+)
8* *);+% +;0**% 04;0<+ +8#$4 4*#%% 8)#8;
8; <;8*< 0+%408 +<+<$) +<#08 84#<$ 4;#)+
8< <+;0$ +$0$$; 08$4*) +;#%8 4+#<+ $+#+*
8) $%<$$ +8+*8% 0<;+$* +%#*% 0)#$4 $)#<;
$% *<*0; +04%<% 0<;)88 +8#4+ 0$#** *%#%4
S-*TION II
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
$+ ++$8* 4<)4%4 ;<<%0 0#8+ <+#+* +*#84
$0 +88*; 4)<$$% ***48 4#%0 <4#%) +4#<)
$4 8+0$$ 4**$8< ;+<8< <#*% ;*#80 +8#)<
$8 +844%+ 0)$)+) 8%84+ 0)#<< *+#*) <#84
$$ )$%<8 4+)08) *$4+< +)#<0 **#$* +4#*0
S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
$* 0);0< 4)<*;8 $+08) *#0% <4#+0 +%#*<
$; 8$4$4 4*))%< *84)% )#8* ;;#+0 +4#80
$< 04)8% 4)8;+< *%))4 8#)) <0#0) +0#;0
$) <4)4% 44%;%0 *$%+) +;#$% *<#)$ +4#$*
*% +%8)%4 0)<**+ ;*%<; 0+#<; *0#0; +$#<*

A-R 2: MATG-MATI*S
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) mar'
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: ?
*orrect re!0on!e Cron& re!0on!e B.an' H o" *orrect Re!0on!e H o" 1ron& Re!0on!e B.an' 0ecenta&e

Num5er o" attem0t! ercenta&e o" attem0t!
8+ <$)<% +;+<8% 00+<4+ +;#)4 4$#<4 8*#0$
80 )*$%+ +0**$) 0$*8)+ 0%#+0 0*#8+ $4#8;
84 )*$8+ +;*<)0 0%*0+< 0%#+4 4*#<< 80#))
88 <0+%4 0+0;8% +<8<%< +;#+0 88#4$ 4<#$4
8$ ;<4;; )0%%8 4%)0;% +*#48 +)#+< *8#8<
8* 8)+%< 0004++ 0%<040 +%#08 8*#4$ 84#8+
8; )<<00 0+**<4 +*8+8* 0%#*% 8$#+< 48#00
8< ))*%0 +*00$0 0+;;); 0%#;; 44#<4 8$#8+
S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er (-1) mar'
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
8) $<0;$ 08;+;+ +;80%$ +0#+$ $+#$4 4*#40
$% *+8*0 +;+8$0 08*;4; +0#<+ 4$#;$ $+#88
$+ 8<;8$ 0+0%4% 0+<<;* +%#+* 88#0+ 8$#*4
$0 $*4)< +))0+4 008%8% ++#;* 8+#$4 8*#;+
$4 +480%) +<<<<< +$*$$8 0;#)< 4)#4< 40#*8
$8 <;04* 084%;8 +8)48+ +<#+) $%#*< 4+#+8

S-*TION III
*orrect an!1er *orrect an!1er 8 Mar'! Cron& An!1er No ne&ati%e mar'!
Num5er o" 6ue!tion! in t$i! !ection: >
$$ 8*04< 4<$))8 8;8+) )#*8 <%#8; )#<)
$* <%004 4*<<++ 4%*+; +*#;4 ;*#<) *#4<
$; )%;*8 4$++4) 4;;8< +<#)0 ;4#0+ ;#<;
$< +80)0* 40+%0< +$*); 0)#<% **#)4 4#0;
$) +40)4% 4048$$ 040** 0;#;+ *;#88 8#<$
*% % % % %#%% %#%% %#%%


18

Section B: arameter! in".uencin& t$e candidate!I 0er"ormance in IIT-J--

The per(ormance is aued by considerin the ratio o( the candidates who obtained rank in IIT&JEE and the
correspondin number o( candidates who attempted the IIT&JEE 0%+0# It is obser.ed that the (ollowin
parameter do in(luence the chances o( a person clearin the IIT&JEE or not#
>a? 1reparation methods the candidates adopts
>b? 1lace o( schoolin .iA# 2illae, town or city
>c? Board (rom where the candidate passed the Buali(yin hisFher Examination
>d? Oear o( passin Juali(yin Examination
>e? 3andidates !other Tonue

a# re0aration 5) t$e candidate! "or attem0tin& IIT-J--/
7n a.erae, only one in (i.e reistered students took extra help >most probably some sort of coaching)
but they make up about hal( o( the success(ul candidates# !ore than two (old increase in their success
rate o.er other students >who only did self study? is a clear indication o( the e((ect o( extra help
>probably pro(essional coachin?# @urther analysis also supports this assertion# Chile sel(&study students
can hold their own in Aones like Bombay and !adras and to a slihtly lesser extent in Delhi, they could
not per(orm well in Guwahati, Kanpur, "oorkee and Kharapur Aones# It is worth noticin that students
in Guwahati Aone had per(ormed much better i( they had some extra help# It also hints at a.ailability o(
better conditions o( sel(&study in Bombay, !adras and Delhi Aones# The data based on which the abo.e
conclusion is drawn is i.en Ta5.e A>

5. .ace o" !c$oo.in& and cate&or):
-bout 8$E o( the reistered candidates came (rom Bombay and !adras Hones as opposed to $E o( the
(rom Guwahati# Increased opportunity (or students in the Bombay and !adras Aones as compared to
Guwahati Aone is probably the main reason (or this di((erence# The share o( 7B3 candidates increased in
reistrations (rom towns and .illaes# In (act, more 7B3 candidates than eneral candidates reistered
(rom .illaes# 7( all the candidates who were o((ered admission, *+E, 0;E and +0E candidates were
(rom the cities, towns and .illaes, respecti.ely# - slihtly di((erent distribution is seen in the reistered
candidates as correspondin numbers chane to rouhly $+E, 4%E and +)E# 7.erall city candidates did
better as aainst $+E reistration they could et *+E o( the total admission o((ers# ,3 and ,T
candidates did relati.ely better in the cities as they ot <E and 8E o( admission o((ers compared to
about $E and +#$E o( reistrations# It can be seen as sin o( more e((ecti.e use o( the reser.ation policy
in cities# General candidates, on the other hand per(ormed better in the cities# The supportin data are
i.en Ta5.e A@

c. Board "rom 1$ere t$e candidate 0a!!ed t$e 6ua.i")in& -2amination:
3B,E board students per(ormed better than the state board students as they constituted 4<E o( the
Buali(ied candidates which is hiher than the 4%E reistered in GE cateory# ,tate board students made
up about 8%E o( the Buali(ied candidates aainst $+E o( reistrations# !ore than )%E o( the reistered
candidates came (rom state boards and 3B,E with I3,E contributin another 8E# Interestinly, +E
>about $%%% in number? students studied outside these three#
General candidates seem to pre(er 3B,E as they constitute about two&third o( all reistrations and
three&(ourth o( Buali(ied candidates (rom 3B,E# Their share in reistration and Buali(ication (rom other
boards drop to less than $%E and *%E, respecti.ely# 7B3 on the other hand, seem to pre(er the state
boards as they make up more than one&third o( reistered as well as Buali(ied candidates (rom the state
boards# The respecti.e numbers (or them in 3B,E drop to about one&(i(th# ,3 and ,T do not show any
major chane in shares in both the Boards#

d. T$e Ro.e o" &ender
It is absolutely clear that boys ha.e per(ormed better than irls# Chile only about twice as many boys
reistered than irls, eiht times more boys Buali(ied, nine times more boys were counseled and ot
admission o((er# The same trend is seen across .arious cateories with minor .ariations# "atios (or 7B3
are e.en worse and those o( ,3 and ,T show marinal impro.ement# To add to this, irls ha.e ot lesser
ranks also# This can be seen by worsenin ratios as we mo.e (rom data (or Buali(ied to data (or

19
counseled and (inal admission# The increase o( irls share in reistration as compared to earlier years
may be attributed to "eistration (ee exemption (or irls and eneral increase in irlPs participation#
It is (elt that the (act that 44E o( reistered candidates are irls, which is a remarkable increase,
compared to the pre.ious year numbers# Exemption o( (ee has de(initely has a positi.e impact on the
mindset o( the irl# 5umbers o( irls ettin Buali(ied in IIT&JEE is likely to o up in (uture as more and
irls write the examination#

e. -ducationa. 6ua.i"ication! o" 0arent!
It is clear that the le.el o( parentPs education has a marked e((ect on the candidatePs per(ormance >see
Ta5.e A11?# 3andidates with both parents raduate >BG? ha.e per(ormed much better >almost twenty
percentae points hiher? than those with only one parent raduate >7G? who, in turn >by ten
percentae points?, ha.e per(ormed better than candidates with none o( the parents raduate >5G?#

(# 9an&ua&e o" 6ue!tion 0a0er u!ed "or 1ritin& IIT-J--
Enlish remains the o.erwhelminly (a.ored lanuae o( Buestion paper# !ore than <$E o( reistered
candidates chose Enlish >see Ta5.e A12?# These candidates ha.e per(ormed better than those who
chose :indi with )8#8E o( the Buali(ied optin (or Enlish# 5o candidate (rom !adras who opted (or
:indi Buali(ied# The same was true in Guwahati# Bombay Buali(ied more than two times the next closest
contender, Delhi, amonst those optin (or :indi as the J1 lanuae# 3andidates optin (or :indi ha.e
not per(ormed well in the Kanpur Hone where a share o( 8#$E in reistration declines to %#8$E in
counseled students# They ha.e per(ormed well in Bombay Aone where they are counseled in about the
same ratio as they ha.e reistered#

&. .ace o" re!idence %i,. %i..a&e+ to1n or cit)
The "eistered as well as Buali(ied candidates were concentrated in a (ew bi cities# !ore than hal( the
candidates Buali(ied (rom just ele.en cities# In (act, more than )%E Buali(ied (rom just about ;$ cities#
,imilar number o( students appeared (rom 1atna, Delhi and Jaipur with 1atna slihtly ahead o( the
other two# !ore than 0$%% candidates Buali(ied (rom Jaipur# :yderabad and Delhi take the second and
third spot, respecti.ely# Cith slihtly more than +%%% Buali(ied candidates, 2ijaywada comes a distant
(ourth in this list but has the best success rate as only +%%%% candidates reistered (rom there#
,upportin data is in Ta5.e A18#

$. Occu0ation o" 0arent!
1arentsP 7ccupation has a sliht but de(inite e((ect on candidatePs per(ormance# 3andidates whose
parents are in medical and enineerin pro(essions ha.e per(ormed slihtly better than other
candidates# 3andidates whose parents are in ariculture or in de(ense ser.ices ha.e not been able to
per(orm as well as others# ,upportin data is in Ta5.e A1;#

i. *andidate! Mot$er Ton&ue
:indi has the hihest representation (or reistered, Buali(ied and conselled# The next closest is Teluu
which is smaller by more than a (actor o( 8# The number o( candidates reistered in !arathi is not .ery
hih but the numbers Buali(ied is disproportionately hih#
/. arent! Income
The proportion o( 7B3>53=? candidates whose parental income is below + lakh relati.e to those with
income between + and 8#$ lakhs is disproportionately hih compare to all the other cateories#
,upportin data is in Ta5.e A1@#


-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
16
1
1
1
6
2
1
2
6
3
1
3
6
4
1
4
6
5
1
5
6
6
1
6
6
7
1
7
6
8
1
8
6
9
1
9
6
1
0
1
1
0
6
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
2
1
1
2
6
1
3
1
1
3
6
1
4
1
1
4
6
1
5
1
1
5
6
Marks Obtained Physics Marks
MARKS
N
O
.

O
F

C
A
N
D
I
D
A
T
E
S

-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
16
1
1
1
6
2
1
2
6
3
1
3
6
4
1
4
6
5
1
5
6
6
1
6
6
7
1
7
6
8
1
8
6
9
1
9
6
1
0
1
1
0
6
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
2
1
1
2
6
1
3
1
1
3
6
1
4
1
1
4
6
1
5
1
1
5
6
Marks Obtained Chemistry Marks
MARKS
N
O
.

O
F

C
A
N
D
I
D
A
T
E
S

-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
159
1
3
1
7
2
1
2
5
2
9
3
3
3
7
4
1
4
5
4
9
5
3
5
7
6
1
6
5
6
9
7
3
7
7
8
1
8
5
8
9
9
3
9
7
1
0
1
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
2
1
1
2
5
1
2
9
1
3
3
1
3
7
1
4
1
1
4
5
1
4
9
1
5
3
1
5
7
Marks Obtained Mathematics Marks
N
O
.

O
F

C
A
N
D
I
D
A
T
E
S

-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
3
1
4
4
1
5
5
1
6
6
1
7
7
1
8
8
1
9
9
2
1
0
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
4
3
2
5
4
2
6
5
2
7
6
2
8
7
2
9
8
3
0
9
3
2
0
3
3
1
3
4
2
3
5
3
3
6
4
3
7
5
3
8
6
3
9
7
4
0
8
4
1
9
4
3
0
4
4
1
Marks Obtained Tota Marks
N
O
.

O
F

C
A
N
D
I
D
A
T
E
S
Table A12 : Zone wise distribution of Registered , qualified and Counselled candidates according to language of question paper
Registered Qualified Counselled
Zone QP in
Englis
QP in
!indi
"n Percentage out of
total appeared
#$%&1
QP in
Englis
QP in
!indi
"n Percentage out
of total qualified
2#112
QP in
Englis
QP in
!indi
"n Percentage out
of total qualified
1$#%&
""T 'o(ba) 50125 23239 10.45 4.84 4728 834 19.61 3.46 3479 761 19.92 4.36
""T *eli 59151 11520 12.33 2.40 3745 363 15.53 1.51 2577 329 14.76 1.88
""T +uwaati 56903 2475 11.86 0.52 1280 0 5.31 0.00 971 0 5.56 0.00
""T ,anpur 57181 21811 11.92 4.55 2826 112 11.72 0.46 2007 95 11.49 0.54
""T ,aragpur 58121 3711 12.12 0.77 2609 7 10.82 0.03 1856 7 10.63 0.04
""T -adras 71973 8 15.01 0.00 5004 0 20.75 0.00 3666 0 20.99 0.00
""T Roor.ee 56339 7094 11.75 1.48 2570 34 10.66 0.14 1686 31 9.65 0.18
Total 409793 69858 85.44 14.56 22762 1350 94.40 5.60 16242 1223 93.00 7.00
Table A11 Zone wise distribution of Registered , qualified and Counselled candidates according to Parents educational qualifications
Appeared Qualified Counselled
/u(bers "n Percentage out of
total appeared
#$%&1
/u(bers "n Percentage out of
total qualified 2#112
/u(bers "n Percentage out of
total qualified 1$#%&
'+ 0+ /+ '+ 0+ /+ '+ 0+ /+ '+ 0+ /+ '+ 0+ /+ '+ 0+ /+
""T 'o(ba) 25128 25178 23058 5.24 5.25 4.81 2749 1766 1047 10.95 7.03 4.17 1883 1453 904 10.78 8.32 5.18
""T *eli 27906 22931 19834 5.82 4.78 4.14 2213 1209 686 8.81 4.81 2.73 1374 950 582 7.87 5.44 3.33
""T +uwaati 13961 22453 22964 2.91 4.68 4.79 434 495 351 1.73 1.97 1.40 284 392 295 1.63 2.24 1.69
""T ,anpur 29001 29213 20778 6.05 6.09 4.33 1553 923 462 6.18 3.68 1.84 1000 720 382 5.73 4.12 2.19
""T ,aragpur 22391 21689 17752 4.67 4.52 3.70 1287 819 510 5.13 3.26 2.03 829 607 427 4.75 3.48 2.44
""T -adras 26448 22295 23238 5.51 4.65 4.84 2530 1421 1053 10.07 5.66 4.19 1721 1093 852 9.85 6.26 4.88
""T Roor.ee 24256 19557 19620 5.06 4.08 4.09 1486 651 467 5.92 2.59 1.86 888 466 363 5.08 2.67 2.08
Total 169091 163316 147244 35.25 34.05 30.70 12252 7284 4576 48.79 29.01 18.22 7979 5681 3805 45.69 32.53 21.79



Table A% Zone wise distribution of Registered , qualified and Counselled candidates according to te preparation (etod
Appeared Qualified Counselled
/u(bers "n Percentage out of
total appeared #$%&1
/u(bers "n Percentage out of
total qualified 2#112
/u(bers "n Percentage out of
total qualified 1$#%&
Zone 1elf
1tud)
2113
0ters
20-3
11 0- 11 0- 11 0- 11 0- 11 0-
""T 'o(ba) 56655 16709 11.81 3.48 2913 2649 12.08 10.99 2253 1987 12.90 11.38
""T *eli 54495 16176 11.36 3.37 2031 2077 8.42 8.61 1427 1479 8.17 8.47
""T +uwaati 49056 10322 10.23 2.15 731 549 3.03 2.28 551 420 3.15 2.40
""T ,anpur 64737 14255 13.50 2.97 1534 1404 6.36 5.82 1101 1001 6.30 5.73
""T ,aragpur 51442 10390 10.72 2.17 1624 992 6.74 4.11 1147 716 6.57 4.10
""T -adras 51524 20457 10.74 4.26 2516 2488 10.43 10.32 1852 1814 10.60 10.39
""T Roor.ee 52870 10563 11.02 2.20 1518 1086 6.30 4.50 969 748 5.55 4.28
Total 380779 98872 79.39 20.61 12867 11245 53.36 46.64 9300 8165 53.25 46.75
Table A1 Candidates appeared in bot papers
/u(bers "n percentage
+E 0'C 1C 1T Total +E 0'C 1C 1T
""T 'o(ba) 39931 19944 7613 5876 73364 14.37 14.60 16.33 31.69
""T *eli 45356 16388 6691 2236 70671 16.32 12.00 14.36 12.06
""T +uwaati 27007 25892 4497 1982 59378 9.72 18.96 9.65 10.69
""T ,anpur 44799 24071 9203 919 78992 16.12 17.63 19.74 4.96
""T ,aragpur 37404 14766 5471 4191 61832 13.46 10.81 11.74 22.61
""T -adras 39654 23353 6417 2557 71981 14.27 17.10 13.77 13.79
""T Roor.ee 43780 12156 6718 779 63433 15.75 8.90 14.41 4.20
Total 2$$451 15%&$6 #%%16 17&#6 #$4%&1



Table A2 Candidates Qualified : Zone 8ise
/u(bers "n Percentage
+E 0'C 1C 1T P* Total +E 0'C 1C 1T P*
""T 'o(ba) 3249 1055 770 465 23 5562 22.28 22.01 22.26 41.82 13.77
""T *eli 2683 718 517 161 29 4108 18.40 14.98 14.95 14.48 17.37
""T +uwaati 528 500 198 36 18 1280 3.62 10.43 5.72 3.24 10.78
""T ,anpur 1789 567 522 43 17 2938 12.27 11.83 15.09 3.87 10.18
""T ,aragpur 1541 490 429 132 24 2616 10.57 10.22 12.40 11.87 14.37
""T -adras 2996 1129 614 231 34 5004 20.55 23.56 17.75 20.77 20.36
""T Roor.ee 1795 334 409 44 22 2604 12.31 6.97 11.82 3.96 13.17
Total 1#&71 #$45 5#&4 1112 1%$





Table A1# Parents 0ccupation : Qualified : -ale : 9e(ale
0ccupation -ale 9e(ale
Registered Qualified : : Registered Qualified : :
Agriculture 63688 2131 3.35 0.63 20024 126 0.63 0.63
Business 62274 3971 6.38 1.34 37484 501 1.34 1.34
Medical 4732 567 11.98 5.74 2335 134 5.74 5.74
Engineering 7933 868 10.94 3.88 4739 184 3.88 3.88
Law Practice 3706 223 6.02 1.39 1948 27 1.39 1.39
eac!ing"#esearc! 22416 1524 6.80 1.72 10233 176 1.72 1.72
Pu$lic"%&'t. (er'ice 106821 8100 7.58 2.31 54576 1261 2.31 2.31
Pri'ate (er'ice 34878 2107 6.04 1.55 20131 312 1.55 1.55
)e*ence (er'ices 10716 513 4.79 0.71 5456 39 0.71 0.71
+t!ers 20752 1222 5.89 1.08 11642 126 1.08 1.08
&tal 337916 21226 6.28 1.71 168568 2886 1.71 0.06


Table A16 Qualified Candidates: Categor) ; -ale 9e(ale *istribution
Registered candidates : -ale 9e(ale *istribution
/u(bers "n Percentage out of total registered &6%#7#
Categor) -ale 9e(ale Total 9e(ale -ale Total
+E 188178 106155 294333 20.96 37.15 58.11
0'C 99938 43346 143284 8.56 19.73 28.29
1C 35515 13572 49087 2.68 7.01 9.69
1T 14285 5495 19780 1.08 2.82 3.91
337916 168568 506484

Qualified candidates : -ale 9e(ale *istribution
/u(bers "n Percentage out of total qualified 2#112
Categor) -ale 9e(ale Total 9e(ale -ale Total
+E 12831 1851 14682 7.68 53.21 60.89
0'C 4415 438 4853 1.82 18.31 20.13
1C 3010 455 3465 1.89 12.48 14.37
1T 970 142 1112 0.59 4.02 4.61
21226 2886 24112 11.97 88.03 100

Counselled Candidates : Categor) ; -ale 9e(ale *istribution
/u(bers "n Percentage out of total counselled 1$#%&
Counselled candidates : -ale 9e(ale *istribution
Categor) -ale 9e(ale Total 9e(ale -ale Total
+E 7161 874 8035 5.00 41.00 46.01
0'C 4415 438 4853 2.51 25.28 27.79
1C 3010 455 3465 2.61 17.23 19.84
1T 970 142 1112 0.81 5.55 6.37
15556 1909 17465

/u(bers "n Percentage out of total Ad(itted 4&$%
Ad(itted candidates : -ale 9e(ale *istribution
Categor) -ale 9e(ale Total 9e(ale -ale Total
+E 4315 449 4764 4.69 45.06 49.75
0'C 2416 229 2645 2.39 25.23 27.62
1C 1279 163 1442 1.70 13.36 15.06
1T 629 96 725 1.00 6.57 7.57
8639 937 9576
Table A7 'oard of qualif)ing e<a(ination : Registered candidates
/u(bers "n Percentage out of total Ad(itted &6%#7#
'oard +E 0'C 1C 1T Total +E 0'C 1C 1T Total
C'1E 154380 46220 17839 5689 224128 30.48 9.13 3.52 1.12 44.25
1TATE 121987 92778 29581 13468 257814 24.09 18.32 5.84 2.66 50.90
"C1E 15250 2789 1176 491 19706 3.01 0.55 0.23 0.10 3.89
0T!ER1 2716 1497 491 132 4836 0.54 0.30 0.10 0.03 0.95
Total 294333 143284 49087 19780 506484
58.11 28.29 9.69 3.91 100.00

Table A4 E<a(ination 'oard : Candidates offered ad(ission
'oard /u(bers "n Percentage out of total qualified 2#112
Qualified
+E 0'C 1C 1T Total +E 0'C 1C 1T
,B(E 9214 2367 1752 429 13762 38.21 9.82 7.27 1.78
(AE 4711 2360 1587 663 9321 19.54 9.79 6.58 2.75
-,(E 700 105 114 15 934 2.9 0.44 0.47 0.06
+.E#( 57 21 12 5 95 0.24 0.09 0.05 0.02
&tal 14682 4853 3465 1112 24112 60.89 20.13 14.37 4.61

Registered
+E 0'C 1C 1T Total +E 0'C 1C 1T
,B(E 154380 46220 17839 5689 224128 30.48 9.13 3.52 1.12
(AE 121987 92778 29581 13468 257814 24.09 18.32 5.84 2.66
-,(E 15250 2789 1176 491 19706 3.01 0.55 0.23 0.1
+.E#( 2716 1497 491 132 4836 0.54 0.3 0.1 0.03
&tal 294333 143284 49087 19780 506484 58.11 28.29 9.69 3.91



Table A$ Counselled Candidates= categor) and li>ing place
?illage Town Cit) ?illage Town Cit) Total
+E 39633 80990 173710 7.83 15.99 34.30 58.11
0'C 41655 47913 53716 8.22 9.46 10.61 28.29
1C 11544 13772 23771 2.28 2.72 4.69 9.69
1T 5518 6884 7378 1.09 1.36 1.46 3.91
Total 98350 149559 258575 19.42 29.53 51.05 100.00
/u(bers "n Percentage out of total appeared #$%&1

?illage Town Cit) ?illage Town Cit) Total
+E 499 1819 5717 12.73 27.43 59.84 100.00
0'C 927 1678 2248 2.86 10.42 32.73 46.01
1C 587 949 1929 5.31 9.61 12.87 27.79
1T 210 345 557 3.36 5.43 11.04 19.84
2223 4791 10451 1.20 1.98 3.19 6.37
Ad(itted Candidates= categor) and li>ing place
/u(bers "n Percentage out of total appeared #$%&1
?illage Town Cit) ?illage Town Cit) Total
+E 294 1095 3375 11.94 27.44 60.62 100.00
0'C 479 925 1241 3.07 11.43 35.24 49.75
1C 248 387 807 5.00 9.66 12.96 27.62
1T 122 221 382 2.59 4.04 8.43 15.06
Total 1143 2628 5805 1.27 2.31 3.99 7.57



Table A15 @i>ing Place ; Zone
/u(bers "n percentage out of total registered
&6%#7#
?illag
e
Town Cit) Total ?illage Town Cit) Total
""T 'o(ba) 13264 17779 46279 77322 2.62 3.51 9.14 15.27
""T *eli 9862 14327 50310 74499 1.95 2.83 9.93 14.71
""T
+uwaati
20565 27590 14005 62160 4.06 5.45 2.77 12.27
""T ,anpur 14633 18001 50045 82679 2.89 3.55 9.88 16.32
""T
,aragpur
10438 27183 27741 65362 2.06 5.37 5.48 12.91
""T -adras 17188 29235 31547 77970 3.39 5.77 6.23 15.39
""T Roor.ee 12400 15444 38648 66492 2.45 3.05 7.63 13.13
Total 98350 14955
9
25857
5
50648
4
19.42 29.53 51.05 100.00

/u(bers "n percentage out of total qualified of
2#112
?illag
e
Town Cit) Total ?illage Town Cit) Total
""T 'o(ba) 556 1188 3818 5562 2.31 4.93 15.83 23.07
""T *eli 376 853 2879 4108 1.56 3.54 11.94 17.04
""T
+uwaati
234 584 462 1280 0.97 2.42 1.92 5.31
""T ,anpur 232 535 2171 2938 0.96 2.22 9.00 12.18
""T
,aragpur
216 979 1421 2616 0.90 4.06 5.89 10.85
""T -adras 812 1667 2525 5004 3.37 6.91 10.47 20.75
""T Roor.ee 242 546 1816 2604 1.00 2.26 7.53 10.80
Total 2668 6352 15092 24112 11.07 26.34 62.59 100.00





Table A1& /u(ber of atte(pts
Registered
Qualified in 2612 in 2611 A2616
&tal 416289 89970 225
%E 246198 48048 87
+B, 114756 28448 80
(, 39446 9596 45
( 15889 3878 13

Qualified
Qualified in 2612 in 2611 A2616
&tal 14071 10040 1
%E 9101 5581 0
+B, 2393 2459 1
(, 1983 1482 0
( 594 518 0

Ad(ission 0ffered
in 2612 in 2611 A2616
&tal 5438 4138 0
%E 2970 1794 0
+B, 1297 1348 0
(, 799 643 0
( 372 353 0


Table A1$ Parents "nco(e
Registered
+E 0'C 1C 1T Total
Bel&w 1 La/! 79485 77873 19087 8860 185305
Between 1 la/! and 4.5 la/! 154726 61513 24354 9272 249865
A$&'e 4.5 La/! 60122 3898 5646 1648 71314
&tal 294333 143284 49087 19780 506484

Qualified
+E 0'C 1C 1T Total
Bel&w 1 La/! 1816 1757 839 365 4777
Between 1 la/! and 4.5 la/! 6882 2755 1792 563 11992
A$&'e 4.5 La/! 5984 341 834 184 7343
&tal 14682 4853 3465 1112 24112