Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Atmhents:
Oath of 20 January 2009 offer for mntrmt /Returned & R e d d b d
* Oath of21 darmary 2009 off= for csntract IReturnd & R*
* Notice to the Clerk of Records
Judicial Notice b e 1 of 2)
* Judicial Notice @age 2 of21
! :
Ohms md US chief
mixed S~te3.''
to t h e b -
BHO: "#at 1 will &xGicuPe..
CJ Roberts: "faithfully...the OfF1~3of President of We Uniied Sd.-
BHO : 'fhe W e of President of the United States faitbfullfl
CJRobeW "andl wltotlie besfofmyability...
BHO: 'en= !wi! ta a&hest of my stiility..
CJ Roberts: *...preserve protectand defend fheCai~stitutioA
8HO: " .
". .preseTve protect arro'defend the Cmstifufr"0n of the t ..
CJ Roberts: "So he:^ ybti God"
BHO : *So help me Gad",
'4'
U.S: Cadtutioion ArWe 2 Section 1 Clause 8. .. 'I do solernnlv
- - 8
swear tor aHim
--
7 - -
5-03. Every person who willfully destroys Mattempts to deshoy, or, with intent to steal or d m y ,
takes and carries away any mmd, paper, or promding of a c o w of justice, filed or deposited with any
c l d or oEcer of so& court, or any papa, or document, or record fled or depasikd in any public ofice,
or wid^ any judicial or public officer, &dl, withunt rehmce to the vaIue of the record,paper, d o m e d ,
or procGediag srr taken, pay a h e ofnot more than two thousand dollars, or s* imprisonment, at hard
l a b , aot mwe thaa tree ywm, or both: [S* Q 8 54083411,54 t 4.1J Titie =.- C - . - CH.4.
CRIMES AGAINST msnm h,pablic-ds.)
SC5407. Iftwo or more peasons in my State or Taritory conspire for the purpose ofimpeding
hindering.o b c h g or defeating,ia any m ,thed m come ofjustice in any State or Territory, with
intent d q to my citizenthe equd protection of the laws, or to in* him or his property fur lawhlly
wforcin& or att~tllptingto enforce, the right of any person, or class of person, to the equal protection of
thelaws, ewhofsochpersonshall beprmishedby a f i n e o f n o t l ~ t b a n ~ e h m d r e d n o r m o r e ~ f i v e
thomaad dollam, or by imprkoammt, witb or w i t h u t harrl I&ra wt less than six month nor more tban
six years, or by both sueh h e and imprisonmeai. S w 5 9 1977-1991,20042010,5506-5510.1 Tide LXX
- -
CIUMES. CK.4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Conspiracy to defeat enfammart ofthe laws.)
SEC5408. Evwy officer, having the custody of my m r d , document, paper, or proceding specified in
e m fifty-fim hundrcd and three,who f m d d d y takes away, or withdraws, or destroys any soah
rwmd, docmmt, paper, or p m c d k g filed in his OEM or depsitsd with him or in his cmtody, shall
pay a fine of not more fhan two thougand dollars, or d e r imigrisoammtat bard labor not more than three
yms,or bo€band W moreaver, Wcit his office and be foreva d k w a r d disqualified froan holding
arry ofice u a d a the Govmment of the United States. @esbyiug record by oEca in charge.)
(b) W
h-, M g the wstody ofmy such reed., proceeding, map, book, doarmeat, paper, or
other thing, wiIlllly and d a w f d y conads, removes, mutilates, obliterates, fddies, or destroys
the same, Bhall be fined unda this title or imprimned mot more than tbrae years, Mhth; d s h d
forfeit his office andbe disqualified ftwn ho?di~~gany office mdu the United States. As used in
this subsection, the t m u~ffi~e" does not include the oftice held by my pason as a reaired officer
ofthe Armed F o m of the United States.
[While the misrcpresentetiw of a matend fact, pgst or present may eonslim basis
for an inf- of 1-1 Viad." any act omission or- &ih holves
a breach oflewl duty, mor cmf~dencc justly r e p o d and is injurious m another.
or hy which an undue advantage is taken of another, may become the hundation far
i n f of~fraud, aud wtren them is a duty to t t matetiid
k o o ~ l m e r rofa
fact may b equally rts wrongful as t positive misctpnsenhtbn.Tex.Civ. App. 1943
Ruebeck t*, Hrt~tt.171 SW2d 895, Wwmed I v6 S1Ud 7382 I42 T m 167i I50 A. L.R
""5.1
(Party having supmior knowWge who takes ahan- of mother's ignoramx of the
law to deceiivs him by studied canceatment or mismpremtatiwr can be held reqm-
h k 726
sible fbr that conduct. rex. 1987. FinaSup&. Im v. rfbileneNati~~nul
SW2d S3A
[We(judge5j have na mom right ta decline ttu3 exercise ofjraisdiction which is given,
(thb will include the county court of recodjradgg Victw CariIlo) than lo usurp tha~
which is n d given. The one or the other would be -I to the C.nnstitution."
Chhm v. 6 Kkut 264. (1821); U.S v. WiIJ, 499 US.2M.I
'W)heaa governmwa becomes a patw in my imdhp company, i r diva^^ h l f ,
r(
s(l far tls tmcenc~the mwactim of dmt cornparry. of its sovereign c b t c r , and
t a b that ofa private c m . .-It &ends to a level with t b a with whom it associate
i ~ i fand
, rakes the c w which b b g s to its asxxiahts and to the business
which is to be transacted.* &rnk tfUhiledSIata v. PI MI^ ' Bank rlfUmr~iu
22 US.904(lrP24I.J
1. ["A judgment rendered in violation of due process is void" World Wde VoIKrwagot
W d e r r , 444 US.286,29 I ; National Bmtk v. WiZey, 195 US 257; Penmyer v. Ne_t
95 US 7143
[ ",.. the .mpkmmtsofdue process must b met Wore the court can properly assert in
persomnt j ~ c t i o n "WeZIsFargo v. W e b Fargo,556 F2d 406,416.1
[. w A ~ w h i c h e i t h e r f o r b i & o r r e q ~ ~ d o ' m g o f m ~ i n ~ s o v a g u e t h a t
men ofcommon intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its
application, violates the tmntial of due process of law." C o d I y v. General
Comimction Co.. 269 U.S. 3 8539I]
[. nWheneverit appears that the court lacks subject matterjuzisdiction, the ant is
obliged to dismiss the actiua" Elly v. Coastal Cop., 503 U.S. 131,136-37; U S. v.
Texar, 252 F. Supp 234,2541