Inquiry-to-Curriculum Final Paper: DONT Leave it at the Door
Chris Scales, Marisa Giglio, Erin Bucheit, Rachel Othersen, Sarah Ebright Miami University
2
Abstract This curriculum, Talk Time: Introducing Coping Strategies to Early Learners, addresses stressors of early childhood students (K-3) living in poverty experience at home that affect learning at school. To address this tension, this program, teaches students to consider and address their own stressors and emotions through introspective and interpersonal interactions in a controlled setting.
3
Educational Tension The tensions our group has decided to address all center around the stressors that early childhood students in poverty may have at home that affect learning at school. In our field placements this semester we have all seen many examples of stressors that early childhood students in poverty are facing. From parental drug abuse, to parents and siblings in jail, to hunger, to bed bugs and lice, to homelessness, there are a vast amount of stressors we have seen that students in poverty may face at home. When students come into their classroom, they dont leave their experiences at the door. Most of the time, this is a positive; student experiences are what allow students to become active learners as teachers can build off of these experiences to making learning engaging and meaningful. However, other times this can be a negative. What happens when students walk in the door burdened by negative experiences that are going to affect their health, happiness, and performance at school? Too often, we have seen teachers who, not knowing what to do, just try to ignore the negative experiences and stressors the students in their classroom may be facing. If a student talks about an issue from their home life that is a stressor- a parent in jail, food scarcity, etc., too often the teacher, feeling uncomfortable, and glosses over the statement and tries to redirect the conversation back to academics. But what if we werent afraid to talk about these issues? What if we addressed them head on? What if we had a space purposely created solely to give students a chance to really work through and learn to cope with their stressors, rather than ignoring them? We believe that all students deserve such a space. We believe that it is essential to address stressors at home in order 4
to truly help students be successful in school and, even more importantly, in order for students to truly become healthy and happy individuals. Curriculum Essential Questions/Concepts: Cognitive Development (sensorimotor, language arts, art, communication) Social/Emotional Development (cooperation, communication, interpersonal relationships)
Standards in Practice: CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.2.3 Write narratives in which they recount a well-elaborated event or short sequence of events, include details to describe actions, thoughts, and feelings, use temporal words to signal event order, and provide a sense of closure.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.2.4 Tell a story or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking audibly in coherent sentences.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.2.1 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. Proposed Instructional Plan This curriculum could be implemented with either a whole-school or whole-class introduction to the curriculum. Students will be informed that the school exists to help them academically, socially, and emotionally with any issues that may arise in their lives, whether 5
school related or not. They will be shown support and guidance within the TALK TIME program to discuss anything about their personal lives with adult volunteers during the regular school day. These meetings will occur on school grounds during regular school hours in bi- weekly 45 minute sessions. The exact schedule is at will of the institution in which the curriculum is occurring. Volunteers will attend one 30 minute training session prior to the beginning of the curriculum. They will be instructed on confidentiality, supporting conversational techniques, and youth coping strategies to utilize on and with which to instruct the students. The curriculum will involve personal meeting time, group meeting time, and 3 alternative centers for activity. These centers will be artistic expression, personal writing, or interactive physical coping technique. Prior to each meeting, the curriculum director will prepare a short lesson lasting 5-10 minutes on a specific coping strategy to be given at the beginning of the 45 minute meeting period. Tier 1: Children are given weekly writing prompts that are integrated into the daily plan for writing instruction from their general education instructor. These prompts will be associated with non-academic personal topics that might elicit a response from the student that reveals personal struggle or concern. Such topics can range from broad prompts like How was your weekend? to pointed questioning like Write about the last time you were sad and why you felt that way. The timing for these prompts are subjective and implemented by the general education instructor. Responses will be kept in a personal TALK TIME class journal, which are not to be shared with peers or to be taken home. Teachers should clarify this to students, and keep journals 6
in a safe classroom location to not be disturbed by students unless writing in the journals or unless journals are being taken to Tier 2 of the curriculum.
Tier 2: Volunteers are to come in to the school bi-weekly on a schedule that is conducive to the institution. Volunteers should then separate into different sections of a shared space, such as gymnasium, library, or cafeteria. Prior to beginning the program, volunteers will set up 3 alternative activity centers. The first, artistic expression, will be a small creative station where students can represent their lives through painting, sculpture, or other representative artistic techniques. The second, personal writing time, will be a station where students can write in their TALK TIME journals in greater depth. The third, interactive physical coping technique, will be a guided station where students learn physical practices to guide their emotional management, such as yoga, meditation, or exercised breathing. At the beginning of the meeting, the program director or an active volunteer will present a short 5-10 minute presentation on a coping strategy that deals with a particular common struggle for students. During the meeting, students are free to talk to a volunteer in private to address issues they are struggling with in and out of the classroom. Volunteers are encouraged to buddy up with a particular student for repeated interaction.
Tier 3: Should a volunteer or general education instructor be concerned with the physical or emotional well-being of a student, those concerns will be shared with the institutions psychologist, as well as access to any entries in the TALK TIME journal. At this juncture, an intervention may be planned for a specific student to determine appropriate continuing action. 7
Rationale As we mentioned in the explanation of our tension, we have seen many examples of students in poverty dealing with stressors at home. We feel these students would greatly benefit from time at school learning to cope with these stressors rather than having their teachers ignore these stressors, which is what we have seen many teachers do. There is plenty of research that supports this idea and shows the great importance of teaching coping strategies to young learners. The following articles are evidence-based and lend themselves to support a curriculum that focused on fulfilling Maslows hierarchy of needs and positive coping strategies.
Coping with Poverty-Related Stress: Primary Control Coping: According to Wadsworth, Wolff, Santiago, & Moran (2008), Coping is defined as a conscious, voluntary process that includes attempts to manage emotions and thoughts, regulate behavior and physical arousal, and act on the environment to decrease a source of stress. Students living in impoverished areas are more likely to deal with negative stressors such as: limited financial resources, limited parental support, and /or a limited food supply. Students may also feel guilty for asking their parents for money, food, or other necessities, for a fear of stressing-out the parents or guardian. Because of its pervasiveness and chronicity, living with poverty is grueling and demoralizingit literally wears one down mentally and physically (Rehkopf, 2006). For teachers to not consider the students needs, mentally and physically is both negligent and irresponsible on the teacher. How can students effectively engage and delve forcefully into the content, when their lower-level needs are not adequately taken care of? According to Maslows research, there are a specific needs in a hierarchical pyramid that need to be satisfied before moving up to the next level. Moving from the lower-level needs such as: 8
physiological and safety to the top-level needs of self-actualization, it is evident that students need to have these needs satisfied before they can effectively learn in the classroom. Several useful strategies for coping with poverty-related stress fall under the category of primary control coping, including emotional expression, emotion regulation, and problem solving, Wadsworth, Wolff, Santiago, & Moran (2008). By implementing a curriculum where students can express their thoughts, feelings, and concerns about their home lives through writing, journaling, art therapy, music, and/or physical activities, teachers can try to isolate these issues and try to pinpoint what the student needs to talk about, so he/she is able to effectively engage in the content and learn.
Adverse Life Events, Coping and Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors in Urban African American Youth: African American youth residing in low income urban neighborhoods are disproportionately exposed to adverse life events in multiple domains, increasing their risk for adjustment difficulties related to this life event stress (Attar, Guerra, & Tolan, 1994). Research has shown that the different life events that students face impact the way that they express their emotions whether it be internal or external. The response to these events will also influence the types of coping strategies they use, as well. Coping strategies can further be divided into avoidance and approach coping strategies. In approach coping strategies, students actively confront a problem, instead of distancing themselves from the problem, as in avoidance coping strategies. In a curriculum that fosters expressing thoughts, feelings, and concern, students are more apt to participate and engage in the classroom atmosphere because they feel safe. According to Sanchez, Lambert, & Strickland (2012), Teaching an array of coping strategies that they may employ in various stressful situations may be beneficial. One way to do 9
this is by enhancing male youths problem-solving skills so that they are better able to generate alternative strategies when directly confronted with danger or hostility. Relatively recent research with African American and Latino boys who were exposed to community violence has shown that having multiple ways to cope with a problem, including seeking advice from others, focusing on positive aspects of life, and modifying behavior without confronting others, protected youth against future violent behavior (Brady, 2008). Moreover, recent research indicates that collaborations among community partners, youth, and interventionists can yield adaptations of empirically supported multicomponent programs that are acceptable to participants because they are culturally and contextually appropriate (Sanchez, Lambert, & Strickland (2012). In a curriculum where there are varying centers and stations, where students can choose how to express themselves, specifically to problem-solve, this can indefinitely help the students to practice and utilize effective coping strategies. By having different areas where students can express themselves through artful representations, through creating song lyrics, to performing yoga or meditating, students are have the freedom to articulate and communicate through these positive outlets.
Childhood Poverty, Chronic Stress, Self-Regulation, and Coping: According to Evans and Kim (2013), A pathway linking poverty to human development is the tendency of lower income parents to engage in harsher and less responsive interactions with their children (Bradley & Corwyn, 2002; Conger & Donnellan, 2007; Grant et al., 2003). Less responsive parenting in disadvantaged families includes less attention and social support to childrens emotional needs as well as less instrumental support, such as helping children with school work or providing information or material assistance (e.g., less help finding part-time work and applying to college, less available money). Students who do not have these internal or 10
external resources and supports are more likely to stay in impoverished environments. The cyclical nature of poverty weighs heavily on the children and the caregivers. Childhood poverty is also linked to poor coping strategies in youth. In addition, low- income children who rely primarily on engagement coping strategies, such as problem solving or cognitive reappraisal in response to poverty-related stress, exhibit fewer adverse psychological symptoms (Wolff, 2010). This curriculum allows students to focus on specific problem solving skills and also positive communication skills, in order to effectively meet students needs. Low-income parents who talk less to their children tend to have children with poorer language skills, which limits childrens ability to regulate their emotions because of deficits in emotional expression and communication skills (Hoff, 2002). Not only are children from low- income families at risk for poor coping strategies, they are also more at risk for having issues in their academics, as well. Children who live in poverty struggle more with psychological and physiological stressors. These children would simply benefit from having emotional support and communication, to talk about stressors at home and at school. By intervening quickly and appropriately, children in poverty will more likely to cope with their feelings and emotions in a more suitable way. Response to Intervention
Our curriculum is modeled after the RTI tiered system. We have seen great success with this model in our field placements for academic and behavioral intervention, so we though this model would also be successful for emotional intervention. There is much research showing the effectiveness of this three tier model that starts with universal screening, then moves to small group intervention, and finally to individualized intervention.
11
According to PENT (Positive Environments Network of Trainers), students are identified through universal screening, design, implementation of the students response to evidence based interventions. This three tiered RtI model for behavior and social/emotional support is based on progress monitoring and how this fluid model is effective for students needs.
Concept Map
(insert picture of poster) Assessment When implementing the curriculum program, Talk Time, several types of assessments will be used to make sure the teacher, school, and community is meeting the students social and emotional health. As discussed throughout the paper, there are many different types of coping strategies that will be addressed. In addition, there will be several types of assessments based on the individual coping strategies. The first assessment which will be the responsibility of the classroom teacher will be to collect the writing journals once a week. The teacher will not only be monitoring if the students are answering questions, but will also be able to connect deeper with the students while reading and understanding their journals. There will not be a formal grade for this assessment; however the students are required to answer at least one out five prompts per week to the best of their ability. Regardless of the issue(s) the students decide to discuss, all students will be encouraged to just simply express themselves. The way the journaling will work is that the student will choose the day in they answer the prompt. This then leaves the student feeling empowered by when they write and what they will write about. This assessment is a way for students to be able to feel they are heard. 12
Another type of assessment that will be used is an entrance and exit assessment. Twice a month, volunteers will be coming into the school to talk about different types of coping strategies our students can use when faced with challenges. Before the students go to the coping session, they will receive a slip of paper with the statement: How I have been feeling lately? On this paper will be questions in which there are faces representing different emotions. The students will circle the face they feel matches their emotion to indicate how they have been feeling and dealing with their emotions since the last session. They will fill out these entrance forms before they go to the coping session. The students are required to attend the coping session, however are not required to go see a counselor which will be provided after the breakout session closes. The breakout session that will last for the last forty to forty-five minutes in which all students will go to a shared space. Students can choose to play, do artistic expression, personal writing, interactive physical coping technique, or go talk to a volunteer about things they may be dealing with. After the forty five minutes is complete, and the students are back in the classroom, the teacher will have a whole class discussion about how they felt about the coping session, and the teacher will pass out post its for students to indicate one thing they have learned from the session. The teacher will then collect and compare the entrance and exit assessments. Based on this assessment the teacher will then indicate if the student needs further guidance in their social and emotional behavior. *Kindergarten and first grade students may draw in their journals instead of write to accommodate age appropriateness
13
Resources
Attar, B. K., Guerra, N. G., & Tolan, P. H. (1994). Neighborhood disadvantage, stressful life events, and adjustment in urban elementary-school children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23 (4), 391400. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2304_5. Cooley-Strickland, M., Sanchez, Y., & Lambert, S. Adverse Life Events, Coping and Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors in Urban African American Youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 38-47. Hoff, E., Laursen, B., & Tardif, T. (2002). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (2nd ed.,pp. 231252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. PENT - Positive Environments, Network of Trainers (California .... (n.d.). . Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://www.acronymfinder.com/Positive-Environments%2c-Network-of- Trainers-(California-Department-of-Education)-(PENT).html. Rehkopf, D.D., Haughton, L.T., Chen, J.T., Waterman, P.D., Subramanian, S.V., & Krieger, N.(2006). Monitoring socioeconomic disparities in death: Comparing individual- level education and area-based socioeconomic measures. American Journal of Public Health,96. 2.135-2.138. Wadsworth, M., Wolff, B., Santiago, C. D., & Moran, E. (2008). Adolescent coping with poverty-related stress. The Prevention Researcher, 15, 13-16. Wolff, B. C., Wadsworth, M. E., & Santiago, C. D. (2010). Family poverty, stress, and coping. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 941951). New York, NY: Springer.