FACULTY OF MECHANICAL & MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING

UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA

Introduction (10%)
Group Description
Product / Project Background
Objective & Design Scope
Milestone / Planning Chart
Design and Analysis (75%)
Concept Development [Sketching] (5%)
Addresses the entire system (global picture)
Shows how each component fits together
Labels components to identify key features and provides description
Shows approximate dimensions
Provides realistic visualization
Engineering Analysis
Fundamental Analysis (10%)
Power required are determine with proper justification and calculation
Motor is been selected properly with proof and reasonable power
Gear ratio is determine accordingly
Gear Fundamental Analysis (10%)
Module selection are reasonable
Number of gear teeth are determine properly
Diameter, torque and RPM are calculate properly
Contact ratio analysis are also included
Acting load at each gear are been calculated correctly
Gear Failure Analysis (15%)
Material selection has been discuss properly
Determination of face width and Qv are reasonable
Correct prosedure used to calculate AGMA bending and pitting stress
Describe with details
Used proper justification and assumption
Bending and pitting safety factor are in acceptable range
Shaft Analysis (15%)
Correct resolve forces at the shaft free body diagram
Calculate bending load with proper bending moment diagram
Shaft material selection is also been discussed
Include with proper stress concentration factor analysis
Calculated minimum diameter required at each gear
Fatigue and yield factors of safety are met
Included with tolerances and fitting analysis at each shaft
Bearing Analysis (5%)
Bearing forces have been correct resolved
Correct prosedures used to determine bearing load rating
Suitable bearing size have been selected
Housing Analysis (5%)
All component are fit well and assemble properly
Fitting analysis are also included at bearing support
Sound engineering effort made to reduce overall weight
Innovative design (clear and reasonable)
BDA 30803 - DESIGN PROJECT REPORT - TOP 4 BEST REPORT SEM II 2011/2012 RATING COMPARISON
Exaggerate
Exaggerate
Front
Michanikos
Front
Michanikos
PRO DESIGN
Design Box
Design Box
PRO DESIGN
2.1
2.2
2
No. Evaluate Item
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
Detail Design - Project Drawing (10%)
Show assemble component in 3D drawing with adequate clarity
Use exploded views with BOM to show assemble of parts
Provide adequate dimensioning and tolerances to build part properly
Adheres to ANSI standard
Arrange the drawing in systematic approach
Fill all the information required in the drawing title block
Conclusion and Recommendation (10%)
Conclude on Project Understanding and Achievement
Recommendation
References (5%)
Use proper format
Well presented and organized
Bonus
Report Appearance
Follow the format / Have table of contents
Contents are organize well & report is binding properly
Exaggerate
Exaggerate
Front
Michanikos
Design Box
PRO DESIGN
Exaggerate
Front
Michanikos
Front
Michanikos
Front
Michanikos
Exaggerate
Design Box
Design Box
PRO DESIGN
3
4
PRO DESIGN
5
2.3
Design Box
PRO DESIGN