You are on page 1of 3

Log in

Forgot your password? Forgot your username? Create an account


Set up a probe panel to unmask dealings of Vadra & all such VIPs

Created on Thursday, 01 May 2014 18:07
Image courtesy: BJP

The nation should be grateful to Priyanka Gandhi Vadra for narrating a sob story about the slur campaign against her
husband, Robert Vadra. She has thus inadvertently turned the national focus on the larger issue of suspicious and perhaps
illegal benefits accruing to politically exposed persons (PEPs), their family members & associates.
Mrs. Vadra claims she has eternal faith in the truth. So has the public. Then what is the hitch in the UPA appointing an
independent commission to unravel the truth about the wealth amassed by her husband and other such VIPs?
Congress bte noir Narendra Modi has publicly challenged UPA to undertake all sort of investigations into his activities to
uncover any alleged wrongdoing. Can Priyankaji formally urge the Supreme Court to institute such a probe into all business
transactions of the Gandhi family to prove her faith in the truth?
The case for probe against Mr. Vadra is strong as he is a deemed public ocial by virtue of alloment of a ministerial house, grant of special
protection group security and provision of other privileges available to super VIPs in Government.
The proposed commission should be mandated to not only investigate her husbands real estate deals but also the transactions of all other
PEPs families right from the initiation of economic reforms in mid-1991. This would effectively rule out political vindictiveness.
Such an exhaustive probe would also establish the growing trend of non-cash bribes channeled through a complex web of subsidiaries and
transactions that appear to be normal business and often go undetected. The Commissions ndings would also perhaps establish a co-relation
between manipulated reforms and crony capitalism.
As put by Asian Development Bank in its anti-corruption & Integrity report for 2013, Corruption is not single-celled. It does not move in just one
direction and has many causes and symptoms. It has no single cure and will continue to grow and fester unless addressed from multiple fronts.
And the most crucial front that has been poorly investigated in India is the nexus between PEPs and businessmen. The latter group is ever eager
to manage its turf through favourable regulations & their interpretation and their faulty implementation.
The PEP-business nexus extends from issue of invitation to hand-picked businessmen to attend innocuous, high-prole get-togethers to
announcement of tax concessions. Some businessmen pay bribes/donations to secure invitations for get-togethers where they can do networking
with powers that be. The nexus has always been a dark alley in the fight against corruption.
International Anti-Money Laundering (AML) organization, Financial Action Task Force (FATF) of which India is an active member, denes PEP as an
individual who is or has been entrusted with a prominent public function. Due to their position and inuence, it is recognised that many PEPs are
in positions that potentially can be abused for the purpose of committing money laundering (ML) oences and related predicate oences,
including corruption and bribery.
In its guidance on PEPs issued in June 2013, FATF has also defined domestic PEPs, their family members and close associates.
The guidance says: If a nancial institution or DNFBP (Designated Non-Financial Business or Professions) nds that a PEP has known family
members and close associates, it should search its records to determine whether it may be providing nancial services to such members or
associates, and if so classify them as PEPs and apply the required enhanced due diligence measures.
Has any concerned Indian regulator advised stakeholders of real estate sector to exercise due diligence in the case of Mr. Vadra? Certainly not.
On the contrary, the authorities in Haryana have bent rules to favour Vadra as has been brought out by persecuted honest IAS ocer Ashok
Khemka.
Dubious loans, equity investments, consultancy fees and donations by businessmen to PEPs family members and associates have been an
integral part of new wave of crony capitalism, which is the other side of economic reforms coin.
Sons, daughters, sons-in-laws (foster one too) of PEPs have been entangled in such controversial transactions. PEPs in this case include former
Chief Justices of India (CJIs) and ministers from both Congress and BJP at the Centre and the States. Unfortunately, the Supreme Courts public
interest-centric activism has been wanting in the overall domain of PEPs except for the 2G and coalgate scams.
Though the apex court has overseen several cases including that of two ex-CJIs Justice Y K Sabharwal and Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, no case has
matured into a nal verdict that should have hopefully shed light on what constitutes illegal gratication given to PEPs, their families and
associates.
The other day Priyankaji emotionally complained before the electorate that her husband is a victim of smear campaign. Addressing a public
gathering in her mothers Lok Sabha constituency, Rae Bareli, Mrs Vadra reportedly said: Lot of harsh words are used for my family and my
husband.
Priyankaji is right to the extent that loud mouths like Uma Bharti have no business to say that BJP Government will send Vadra to jail. Umaji, who is
an ex-CM, should know that judicial process cannot be bypassed. Ms Bharti should thus apologize to Priyankaji for calling her husband a thief. If
Mr. Vadra has cheated exchequer of any revenue, then it is for the judiciary to define such crime and award the punishment.
Invoking Nobel Lauerate Garcia Marquezs letter whose authenticity has been doubted by many, Mrs Vadra said: We must instead say what is in
our heart. This feeling comes to me too. See what elections are becoming. What kind of politics is playing out? This country which was the land of
Gautam Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi... its character is being changed.
I have learnt from Indira Gandhiji that if truth is in one's heart it will become your strength... the harder you try to make one fall the stronger we
will stand up. The more they try to humiliate, more strongly will I fight.
Priyankaji, emotional drama can cut ice with the gullible rural folk for a while. It cannot and must not put o the demand for an impartial
investigation for truth, which the UPA has resisted to the hilt.
The public wants to know why Gandhi-Vadra family has locked this truth in their hearts and les? Why have they stone-walled legitimate media
Home About me Media Blog Archive Video Gallery Photo Gallery Search...
< Prev Next >
queries about their businesses including that of prime ministerial prospect Rahul Gandhi.
The public wants point-by-point reply to issues raised by BJP leader Dr. Subramanian Swamy on dierent occasions including the ones on Backops
Services Pvt. Ltd. A similar reply is required on charges leveled by Arvind Kejriwal in October 2012.
Interestingly enough, Mr. Kejirwal, who had demanded an FIR against Mr. Vadra, later maintained silence on this issue. This obviously contributed
to his rise to Chief Ministership in January 2014 with the blessings of Gandhi family! Why he did not order filing an FIR against Mr. Vadra as Delhi CM
on the lines of one he ordered on the issue of gas pricing? Why did Mr. Kejriwal not investigate whether Mr. Vadra exercised any inuence in grant
of approvals by Delhi Government to DLF projects?
To unravel the business relationship between Vadra group and DLF group, one has to access all Central and Congress-ruled State Government
files to know the details of various regulatory approvals given to DLF group of companies. Only a national commission can do that.
The proposed panel also must nd out whether there was any dilution in ocial objections to DLF applications before and after Vadra-DLF entered
into business relationship. It should also nd out whether there was any change in the pace of grant of approvals by Haryana, Delhi and
Rajasthan Government to DLF after emergence of Vadra on the realty scene.
Whether there has been any accounting fraud or any other legal violation in Vadra-DLF transactions can be established only by accessing the
books of accounts of all relevant firms. Only a national commission or a supreme court appointed special investigation team (SIT) can do that.
To know whether Mr. Vadra has been favoured by any Congress-ruled State Government, one has to access all relevant documents which are
buried in the Government les. One has to access all telephone records of Vadra and his appointments over the last 10 years. Only a national
commission can do that.
The truth would thus emerge from such fearless and unbiased probe and not from sob story of a virtuous and dedicated wife.
This investigative approach mooted for nding whether there was illegal gratication given by DLF or any other entity to Vadra should also be
applied similarly in all other PEPs whose wealth accretion at supersonic speed has resulted in public outcry.
Loans from regulatory approvals-seeking companies to PEPs has been the common strand of all scams from 1992 Securities Scam to 2G scam to
Jijaji, to borrow a word from Mr. Modis lexicon.
Remember the Rs 32.74 lakh that Harshad Mehtas Growmore deposited in the account of K.J Investments, a company owned by two sons of
Gandhi family loyalist-cum-veteran CEO, V Krishnamurthy in 1991-92. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) considered it as bribe, whereas Mr.
Krishanmurthy described the amount as a loan. In 2000, a special court absolved Krishnamurthy of all charges including the Rs 32.74-lakh loan.
Way back in 1959, the Supreme Court, on the other hand, had dismissed contention of a bribe-seeking junior railway employee that he accepted
a loan (not a bribe) of Rs 375 for nancing his childrens education from the bribe-giving petty contractor. The railway employee made this claim
after he was caught red-handed accepting the extorted bribe.
Whether a dubious payment is loan or bribe or a business enabler given to PEPs as quid pro quo for favours thus needs legal clarity. This is
urgently required as provision of unsecured, informal loan or the so-called business advance as in the DLF-Vadra case, is becoming a fashionable
trend in PEPs domain.
Himachal Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh, his wife and a company promoted by their children have all taken separate loans aggregating to a few
crore of rupees from the promoter of hydro-electric projects whose default has been repeatedly condoned by the State Government.
Disgraced ex-President of BJP Nitin Gadkari also took loans from two real estate developers.
Why is that real estate companies are fond of entering into business relationship with PEPs and their family members? Recall the transformation
of Pawan Impex, a shell company owned by two sons of Justice Sabharwal into a joint venture with Kabul Chawla, the promoter of well-known BPTP
group. Recall Sabharwal sons another JV with another real estate developer, Purshottam Bagheria.
Any discussion on PEPs would not be complete without citing the case of Karnataka ex-BJP CM B.S. Yeddyurappa (BSY) family-controlled trusts
Prerana Educational and Social Trust (PEST)/ Prerana Education Trust (PET).
The Trust had reportedly disclosed to CBI in May 2012 that it received Rs 44.06 crore from 49 donors between September 2006 and March 2011.
What has not yet been established that some of the donations have been quid pro quo deals for approvals given to certain mining and
metallurgical companies.
The list of cases of financial transactions between PEPs families and companies seeking favours and approvals is long and varied.
UPA allowed this rot to grow for obvious reasons. It is now left to the Supreme Court to seize an opportunity to direct UPA to set up a national
commission on PEPs to identify legal loopholes and lay down water-tight guidelines to minimize the scope for corruption. Or would the apex court
wait for new Government to take a lead in this arena? Or would the new Government also look the other way round like the UPA? Or would the new
Government wait for the constitution of Lok Pal and thus pass the buck to it?
How long the public has to wait for the truth?
Published by taxindiaonline.com on 27th April 2014
http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/inside2.php3?filename=bnews_detail.php3&newsid=20285
ADD COMMENT

Name (required)

E-mail (required, but will not display)

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments
You are here: Home Corruption Set up a probe panel to unmask dealings of Vadra & all such VIPs
Top
Copyright 2014 www.nareshminocha.com. All Rights Reserved. Designed by VectraImage.com.
Send
JComments
Refresh